Jammu Africa
JF-Expert Member
- Jan 3, 2010
- 530
- 59
Just from perusing my copy of the costitution 2010 and therein exists nothing like the "National Security Advisory Commitee". ukwelikitugani, rao will defy this outfit on a legal standing if he chooses to go thru. Otherwise ata kama ni tribal composition he cant dare defy.
Kabaridi, you have officially been summoned, hehe...hii kitu iko kwa katiba gani na ya nani..my copy identifies a NSC chaired by the presidency, hii ingine ya Kimemia iliundwa aje and why is it usurping powers of the presidency led by NSC.
Pure discussion, nothing personal or tribal.
Kabaridi, yet again we find ourselves in a situation where constitutional offices are created without a constitutional backing....makes sense? It does.Ndugu livefire
I do no know how the NSAC was formed but I can liken it to the Transitional authority TA that recently sent commissioner to the county. These are constitutionally formed. Do we have any comittee that formed the TA, if it does not exist then we are raising the alarm for nothing
Kabaridi, yet again we find ourselves in a situation where constitutional offices are created without a constitutional backing....makes sense? It does.
The transitional authotity was created through an Act of Parliament, to be specific, "The Transition to Devolved Govt Act 2012" and commenced administration on march 9, 2012. Everything including structure of TA and formation are there in.
Now back to our quiz, who created this animal NSAC without any legal constitutional backing or parliamentary oversee....even CIC has a constitutional backing including the formation and functions.
expunge Raila from this records, am not going political.lol. Dig in from that major from "TEA" then share what you gather, hehe
mkuu soma hapa allAfrica.com: Kenya: Secrets of Muthaura Security Talks (Page 1 of 2) it looks like the NSAC animal has been existing from 2008
NSAC is a creation of those who do the ground work for ICC. That means maina kiai et al understands NSAC and its intentions and those they wish to implicate in the imaginary NSAC. they are crucial foot-soldiers to the ICC process in kenya
Swali lingekuwa hivi," Kwakuwa nchi ina makabila 42, wakamba,luo,turkana,kikuyu, luhya n.k, je kwani chombo kikubwa hicho cha maamuzi ya kiusala kinakaliwa na jamii moja"?? Unaonaje hapo?:A S angel:
swali zuri sana, unajua chombo kama kile kinapokuwa na mchanganyiko wa makabila inaondoa wasi wasi ktk jamii,kwa mfano hivi sasa tension iliyopo kenya,chombo hichi kikifanya maamuzi yoyote yawe mazuri au mabaya utasikia "wakikuyu na wakelenjin wanatupelekesh"kisa na sabubu ni kwamba hakijabalance kimakabila ya kenya.twende mbele turudi nyuma bila upendeleo wakenya wananyonywa na kukaliwa na kabila la wakikuyu.mimi sifichi na sitaki kuwa mnafiki,Hawa jamaa kikuyus ni wabinafs sana,awependi maendeleo ya wenzao.
WE have become law geeks. NSAC is a committee not an office. It comprises of top security and legal officers who meet to discuss security issues. Generally the implementing agency is always the Head of Public service.I have searched wide n deep, this office remains anonymous, like it was meant to be a covert office but somehow by mistake or design its innerds leaked out....
I find no single act of parliament referencing to it, the above article doesnt answer the origin of the office.
Logical Conlusion: its a GoK office, not KIAI's child, and with no records justifying the how being and need of its existence....I HENCE LABLED IT AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL OFFICE. This "animal" was meant to be an adhoc committee to deal with the 07 drama but it has lasted and lasted ever since with no single legislation guiding it.
Recommendations:The NSC should scrap this waiganjo committee usurping its duties.
WE have become law geeks. NSAC is a committee not an office. It comprises of top security and legal officers who meet to discuss security issues. Generally the implementing agency is always the Head of Public service.
However, given Raila's penchant for lawlessness in the name of democracy,he was cautioned in the name of the three security organs including the military.
That was the only way to tame him because the military is not know to entertain non sense. What they say is an order to be obeyed to the letter and he knows that.
Don't be silly. The committee has always been there. Only Raila has tried to make it a monster it isn't.so Nsac was formed to tame Raila,not to serve the interest of kenyans.!?
Don't be silly. The committee has always been there. Only Raila has tried to make it a monster it isn't.
The question being asked mkuu mwenzangu, is What/Who created this organ?...is there a constitutional decree for it?
Thats the question.....Or is it an ad hoc committee that was put in place 'to tame Raila' as Crucial Man, put it.
No need to call people out of their names by labelling them silly. We can do better than that.
Don't be silly. The committee has always been there. Only Raila has tried to make it a monster it isn't.
I have been busy couldnt respond to you, nsac wasnt there pre 2007, my issue with this security apparatus or whatever committee it is, is, its taking advantage of our old mans condition, Kibaki chairs NSC, NSAC is an advisory committee that advises NSC, under what provision?
Whats the composition of NSC? Same people on NSAC to the dot....
So why pretend u are advising function "A" while u are that very same function A only with a different chairmanship qualitatively making it function B?
Duplication of tasks by a non constitutional committee, else u give me a backing by the constitution that validates the necessity and existence of NSAC it still stands unconstitutional. Read the constitition on formation of public committees, security etc etc.....this commitee is in the air, not quoted anywhere.
And Raila infact has no issues with NSAC, expunge him also from this records coz i dont know him anyway. Educate me with a constitutional clause. This is a forum for educating each other afterall
ukwelikitugani, when you are dealing with people who are operating way high above their heads and themselves to disregard constitutional processes, or what VETO are we talking about. I would not believe NSAC even if it exists may plan something atrocious like hosting mungiki to statehouse for execution of some community..Huoni tatizo ? Nafasi zenyewe Zipo kiupendeleo,
Nisaidie uweke hapa Provincial Commissioners ili ujue nini naongea. Zaidi, hivi unelewa Nguvu za hivyo vyombo vya usalama? they got some sort of farfetched VETO..
Mkuu on sensing imminent defeat, Raila is stoking controversy, I like the spirited way he is acheiving this agenda but mkuu I turn biblical for you, didnt moses have to climb a mountain to see canaan yet he couldnt not reach there on commandments from God?. Mengine ni mungu mkuu and nothing can be done in this case! we have talked so much we have fought with words but somethings are pre-destined
But even if this animal NSAC exists, and uncosntitutional I recommend it. The ICC has tried fighting the chair of head of public service to no avail. It has only strengthened the resolve to maintain the post. if the chair is constitutional then I do not see why there should be need to create uneccesary alarm over it.
Sometimes it is neccessary to tame rayila to keep the nation together intact. And if the military, and security organs resolve to enforce peace at all means, your man rayila will shut up.....it might be intolerable!
....As at now he is being watched very keenly,! what he is doing, fanning animosity countrywide over polls and unsubstantiated claims of poll rigging using state machinery and resources.
The NSAC is a committee of heads of security organs, these include the military, the Police, The national intelligence, the ministry in charge of security, The AG and the head of public service. It has existed since independence. it does not require constitutional sanction because it is derived from functions of constitutionally sanctioned offices. I am sure every government in the world has such an office.The question being asked mkuu mwenzangu, is What/Who created this organ?...is there a constitutional decree for it?
Thats the question.....Or is it an ad hoc committee that was put in place 'to tame Raila' as Crucial Man, put it.
No need to call people out of their names by labelling them silly. We can do better than that.