I have been busy couldnt respond to you, nsac wasnt there pre 2007, my issue with this security apparatus or whatever committee it is, is, its taking advantage of our old mans condition, Kibaki chairs NSC, NSAC is an advisory committee that advises NSC, under what provision?
Whats the composition of NSC? Same people on NSAC to the dot....
So why pretend u are advising function "A" while u are that very same function A only with a different chairmanship qualitatively making it function B?
The NSC is the Political wing of the NSAC. So the NSAC advises the NSC which takes the matters to the Cabinet and Cabinet authoritzes action if need be.
Duplication of tasks by a non constitutional committee, else u give me a backing by the constitution that validates the necessity and existence of NSAC it still stands unconstitutional. Read the constitition on formation of public committees, security etc etc.....this commitee is in the air, not quoted anywhere.
And Raila infact has no issues with NSAC, expunge him also from this records coz i dont know him anyway. Educate me with a constitutional clause. This is a forum for educating each other afterall
The NSAC is comprised of Professionals in the security organs. The NSC is the political side of it. NSAC advises NSC on security matters, the NSC reports to the cabinet on security matters. RThey exist as a result of the functions of a constitutionally sanctioned offices. They don't need to be sanction. The constitution just like the Courts are being abused by lawless people who want to achieve through the court, diplomats what they could not achieve in the ballot box.