LordMasele III
JF-Expert Member
- May 22, 2021
- 288
- 251
😀😀 kuheshimu mkataba hata kama ni wa unyang’anyi!?.
Tumerogwa na nani!?
😀😀 kuheshimu mkataba hata kama ni wa unyang’anyi!?.Aliyesababisha kuvunjika kwa mkataba mali zake zipigwe mnada kufidia hasara hiyo kwa taifa ili liwe funzo watu kuheshimu mikataba.
Sent from my Infinix X656 using JamiiForums mobile app
Hii ni MIGA?
Kwanini JPM alivunja mkataba? Anayejua tafadhali tupe story kamili ili tuelewe iwapo JPM alifanya makosa.Tatizo hao wawekezaji mnawakaribisha kwa terms za hovyo, mlizoweka tamaa zenu binafsi mbele badala ya maslahi ya Tanganyika, ndio maana akija anayejielewa anaiona nia yenu ovu mwishowe anavunja mkataba.
Kulipa pesa za fidia kukiwa na maana ya kuilinda thamani ya Tanganyika, na utu wa mtanganyika kwangu naona afadhali sana, ashukuriwe yule aliyevunja mikataba ya hovyo dhidi ya mtanganyika.
Kama magufuli asingekufa hao echo energy wala wasingedai kuvunjwa mkataba kwani sheria iko upande wetu. Ukiwa na wapigaji kuongoza wenyewe watawafuata hao kina echo energy kuwashawishi wadai na wao kuhakikisha serikali inashindwa mradi wanatoa percent. Ndio maana wamesubiri hadi magufuli amekufa ndio ukaona madai. Na kila madai yatakayoletwa samia atawaambia tulipe maana wanachotaka pia ni kuonnyesha eti magufuli alivunja mikataba kibabe.
Kama hujui uhuni unaofanywa nyuma ya pazia namafisadi nirahisi sana kumlaumu Magu kwa kuvunja huo mkataba.Mzee wetu JPM nakubali san kutengeneza mfumo wa kiutendaji na kutaka mikataba yenye maslahi! But kweny fungu hili la kuvunja mikataba kibabe ali fail!! Cz madhara ya kuvunja mikataba kibabe ni hii payback!!!! Na haya LISSU alisimama kupinga uvunjwaji wa mikataba kienyeji lkn walinda legacy wakaishia kumuita LISSU mtetea mabeberu!!!!
Ku break contact utaingia gharama za miaka yote ambayo mtu atawekeza!! Tatizo ni CCM kuingia mikataba mibovu!!Kama hujui uhuni unaofanywa nyuma ya pazia namafisadi nirahisi sana kumlaumu Magu kwa kuvunja huo mkataba.
Eti profesa uchwara. Huna hata aibu? Kwa nini wanadai sasa kama sio wanajua wana washirika kwenye hii serikali ya wapigaji. Unafikiri magufuli hakua na msingi wa kisheria kuwavurumisha hao wajanja zulumati waliyokua wanaweka mitego ya ulanguzi kwa kujidai uwekezaji?kesi zote ni mkataba mpya wa mwendazake na wenzake kina kabudi na yule profesa uchwara mwengine, zinatutokea puani sasa.
Autowe wapi msingi wa kisheria?Eti profesa uchwara. Huna hata aibu? Kwa nini wanadai sasa kama sio wanajua wana washirika kwenye hii serikali ya wapigaji. Unafikiri magufuli hakua na msingi wa kisheria kuwavurumisha hao wajanja zulumati waliyokua wanaweka mitego ya ulanguzi kwa kujidai uwekezaji?
Eti profesa uchwara. Huna hata aibu? Kwa nini wanadai sasa kama sio wanajua wana washirika kwenye hii serikali ya wapigaji. Unafikiri magufuli hakua na msingi wa kisheria kuwavurumisha hao wajanja zulumati waliyokua wanaweka mitego ya ulanguzi kwa kujidai uwekezaji?
Wenyewe wanasema hii ilikuwa land grab. Soma:By MMM
Watu wamepiga kelele kutaka kujua ndege imeachiwa kwa masharti yapi. Leo MMM ametutonya kama ilivyo hapo juu Walitaka walipwe US&500M (1.2 Trillion) wamelipwa 403 Bn Tsh.
Magufuli kwa ubabe alivunja mkataba na EcoEnergy ulioingiwa na Kikwete.
cae no. ICSID No. ARB/17/33
Serikali ya Samia imelipa.
Zingelijenga shule ngapi?
Dawa kiasi gani?
Mikopo ya wanafunzi kiasi gani?
EcoEnergy lodges $500m claim after govt revoked its land title
Wednesday, September 20, 2017 — updated on April 17, 2021
View attachment 2684031
A poster showing where a multi-biliion Bafgamoyo Sugar Project was to be implemented by the EcoEnergy Group.PHOTO|FILE
Summary
The case has commenced at the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the World Bank organ, which is based in Washington D.C.
Dar es Salaam. EcoEnergy Group has filed a $500 million arbitration claim against the Tanzanian government over its decision to unilaterally revoke land title for a multi-billion Bagamoyo sugar project.
The case has commenced at the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the World Bank organ, which is based in Washington D.C.
The Commissioner for Lands informed the Bagamoyo EcoEnergy Limited in November, 2017 that the government had resolved to revoke the title deed for the 20, 400 hactares and instead replaced it with the name of the President of the United Republic of Tanzania.
The unexpected move dealt a major blow to the Swedish company that had for over 10 years worked to develop the project and invested $52 million in a ready-to-go project for local production of sugar, renewable electricity and fuel.
Attorney General and government’s chief legal adviser, George Masaju could not be reached by phone yesterday to react on the move. The project was tied under the bilateral investment protection between Tanzania and Sweden, which calls for disputes to be settled by international arbitration.
The revocation was followed by a series of unsuccessful attempts by the company to have dialogue with the government to save the project and pay compensation.
“Despite several invitations from EcoEnergy, GoT (Government of Tanzania) has ignored all offers to meet for a dialogue to save the project. Hence, EcoEnergy has no other option but to seek legal redress though an international arbitral tribunal,” states the document filed at ICSID. The company wrote to President John Magufuli on December 5, 2016 to request his intervention after failed efforts to have the Prime Minister, Kassim Majaliwa and minister for Industry, Trade and Investment Charles Mwijage to give a go-ahead and full support to enable the sugar project to start.
The consortium of EcoEnergy Africa AB of Sweden and Uttam Group of India was to inject $100 million towards the Bagamoyo project as own equity.
The remaining fund of $250 million would have been a combination of DFI and commercial bank lending where a commitment was given by African Development Bank (AfDB) to act as a lead financing arranger. They already had a board decision of the AfDB to allocate $100 million towards the project.
AfDB withdrew their financing commitment later due to inaction by the government to respond to their requests of endorsing the Bagamoyo project in combination with information that the government had revoked the land title with the intention of giving it to a domestic investor.
“We are concerned that you have not been fully informed about the actual situation and about our ability and interest to have the Bagamoyo Sugar Project up and running by 2019…Taking governments inaction and recent actions and their consequences into consideration we and our partners have now undesirably been forced to reassess the entire situation,” read part of the letter to President Magufuli.
The company has outlined several reasons why it opted for the international arbitration to resolve the dispute. “EcoEnergy has the right to be compensated for the financial harm suffered as the result of GoT’s acts and omissions violating the bilateral investment treaty.
“If the government is allowed to continue unchecked, its damaging actions towards private investors will lead to the loss of credibility for Tanzania as a destination for much needed direct investments into agriculture, as well as into other parts of the economy,” the company complains in the arbitration dossier.
The integrated sugar project that was to be carried out by the firm would have been one of the largest private agriculture investments in East Africa with an overall investment of about $500 million, including the outgrower programme.
The Bagamoyo project was estimated to create 20, 000 jobs in the processing facility, the estate, logistics, the outgrower programme and through indirect employment.
In 2013, the government of Tanzania issued a certificate of occupancy for 99 years for 20, 400 hactares free of encumbrance for the western portion of the abandoned Razaba ranch four years after an environment and social assessment certificate had been approved.
Then minister for Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries Mwigulu Nchemba sent a letter to Bagamoyo EcoEnergy on behalf of the government stating: “On behalf of the government of Tanzania and myself, we do appreciate your efforts in supporting the mentioned project. I think it is now time to make our outmost to bring the project to its successful implementation.” EcoEnergy now says: “The government’s act and omission, which have prevented the BEE project from being implemented, violate Tanzanian’s obligations under the bilateral investment treaty. The government has failed to ensure fair and equitable treatment, it has taken unreasonable and discriminatory measures against EcoEnergy,” read part of the document filed at ICSID.
Ripoti wanazosema zilkuwa za 'bargaining' kwa mujibu wa Prof Kabudi
Hivi wewe ni Faizafoxy wa zamani!!!!Dawa ya deni kulipa.
Huwezi kukaribisha wawekezaji wakija kuwekeza halafu uwaambie "sitaki", lazima ile kwako kwa makubaliano ya Umoja wa Mataifa.
Moja ilishikwa Canada - tukalipa.
Nyingne ikashikwa Afrika Kusini - tukalipa.
Hiyo umeshikwa Uholanzi- tumelipa.
Tuliishika meli ya samaki, tukagawana samaki - tumelipa samaki, na meli na muda wote iliyokuwa imekaa kesi inaendelea.
Tuliowapora mali zao tukawalipisha "plea bargain" tumewalipa na bado tunaendelea kuwalipa.
WOTE HUO UJINGA WA MTU MMOJA, NA BADO MADUDU YATAENDELEA KUFUMUKA.
Mkataba alioingia Kikwete akaja kuuvunja Magufuli, then huyo Kikwete "think tank" wa Samia tunaona mwanafunzi wake akitutoa sadaka kwa waarabu milele..
Naamini kabisa huo mkataba ulikuwa wa kinyonyaji kwa watanganyika kwa sababu Magufuli hakuwa na tabia za Kikwete na Samia, hao wawili ni waswahili selfish sana.
RRRRHivi wewe ni Faizafoxy wa zamani!!!!
'Scam artist' . Ushahidi alipeleka Prof mmoja akawa laughing stock...wana vichekesho sana hawa watu.
..hizo ripoti na ushahidi wao mbona havikusaidia ktk "bargaining" mahakamani tulikoburuzwa?
whatever, hiyo kampuni imepata fedha za bureeeeee, bureeeeee bila kuzifanyia kazi..... why not negotiate new terms instead of ejecting them from the land unceremoniously?Wenyewe wanasema hii ilikuwa land grab. Soma:
WHAT IS THE CASE ABOUT?The agribusiness company, Agro EcoEnergy wasgiven a 99 year lease to 20 thousand hectares ofland near Bagamoyo on the east coast of Tanzania,which it planned to turn into a sugar plantation.The planned investment was a flagship project ofthe New Alliance in Tanzania.The land was not empty. It was already in use bysmall-scale farmers and cattle herders. The firstphase of the project would have meant 300 peoplelost their homes, while another 1000 lost land.The company offered compensation but it didnot consult with the local people and get theiragreement and consent to the sugar plantation inthe first place. People were not given the right tosay no to the project. This breaks the internationallyrecognised principle of securing ‘free, prior andinformed consent’, making the project a land grab
Tuna wanasheria wanafanya Serikali ishindwe Makusudi. Pumzika Kwa Amani Baba Magufuli.Dawa ya deni kulipa.
Huwezi kukaribisha wawekezaji wakija kuwekeza halafu uwaambie "sitaki", lazima ile kwako kwa makubaliano ya Umoja wa Mataifa.
Moja ilishikwa Canada - tukalipa.
Nyingne ikashikwa Afrika Kusini - tukalipa.
Hiyo umeshikwa Uholanzi- tumelipa.
Tuliishika meli ya samaki, tukagawana samaki - tumelipa samaki, na meli na muda wote iliyokuwa imekaa kesi inaendelea.
Tuliowapora mali zao tukawalipisha "plea bargain" tumewalipa na bado tunaendelea kuwalipa.
WOTE HUO UJINGA WA MTU MMOJA, NA BADO MADUDU YATAENDELEA KUFUMUKA.