Ndege ya Tanzania iliyokuwa imeshikiliwa Uholanzi yaachiliwa kwa kuilipa Eco Energy US$ 165M (403bn Tsh)

Mimi sina dini na nilishaacha na mambo hayo ya dini za kuletewa na watu wa mashariki ya mbali kwaiyo pole Hilo Cha pili unapata maslai gani ya mojamoja kwa kiongozi kuwa wa dini yako maana Mimi sioni

Ndio maana bandari inauzwa watu mnashabikia kama marofa kisa kiongozi anayefanya ivo ni WA dini yako Sasa sijui hizo fedha atagawa misikitini?
 
Washington

Kesi

EcoDevelopment in Europe AB and EcoEnergy Africa AB v. United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No. ARB/17/33)​


  • Subject of Dispute:
    Agribusiness project
  • Economic Sector:
    Agriculture, Fishing & Forestry
  • Instrument(s) Invoked: (i)
    BIT Sweden - Tanzania 1999
  • Applicable Rules:
    ICSID Convention - Arbitration Rules

  • (a) Original Proceeding​

    • ​

    • Claimant(s)/Nationality(ies): (i)
      EcoDevelopment in Europe AB (Swedish), EcoEnergy Africa AB (Swedish)
    • Respondent(s):
      United Republic of Tanzania (Tanzanian)
    • Date Registered:
      September 11, 2017
    • Date of Constitution of Tribunal:
      February 23, 2018

    • Composition of Tribunal​

    • President:
      Christopher GREENWOOD (British) - Appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council
    • Arbitrators:
      Stanimir A. ALEXANDROV (Bulgarian) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
      Olufunke ADEKOYA (British, Nigerian) - Appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council

    • Party Representatives​

    • Claimant(s):
      Mannheimer Swartling Advokatbyrå AB, Stocklom, Sweden
      Prof. Dr. Kaj Hober, London, U.K.
    • Respondent(s):
      Office of the Attorney General, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
    • Language(s) of Proceeding:
      English
    • Status of Proceeding:
      Concluded
    • Outcome of Proceeding:
      April 13, 2022 - The Tribunal renders its award.

  • (b) Annulment Proceeding​

    • ​

    • Applicant(s)/Requesting Party(ies): (i)
      Respondent(s)
    • Date Registered:
      June 21, 2022
    • Date of Constitution of ad hoc Committee:
      July 18, 2022

    • Composition of ad hoc Committee (Appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council)​

    • President:
      Michael D. NOLAN (U.S.)
    • Members:
      Carole MALINVAUD (French)
      Githu MUIGAI (Kenyan)

    • Party Representatives​

    • Claimant(s):
      Mannheimer Swartling Advokatbyrå AB, Stocklom, Sweden
    • Respondent(s):
      Office of the Attorney General, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
    • Language(s) of Proceeding:
      English
    • Status of Proceeding:
      Concluded
    • Outcome of Proceeding:
      May 16, 2023 - The ad hoc Committee issues a procedural order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rules 53 and 43(1).

Source : Overview of an Arbitration - ICSID Convention Arbitration (2022 Rules) | ICSID
 
Mmawia said:
Bahati nzuri tumefanya mazungumzo na jambo limekwenda vizuri ndege yetu imerudi jana jioni
Click to expand...

Mazungumzo hayo ina maana fedha $165 million imelipwa baada ya kuelewana 'makubaliano' nje ya ICSID na siyo kushinda kesi ?
Outcome of Proceeding:
May 16, 2023 - The ad hoc Committee issues a procedural order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rules 53 and 43(1).
Click to expand...

Rule 43

(1) If, before the award is rendered, the parties agree on a settlement of the dispute or otherwise to discontinue the proceeding, the Tribunal, or the Secretary-General if the Tribunal has not yet been constituted, shall, at their written request, in an order take note of the discontinuance of the proceeding.

Rule 65
Settlement and Discontinuance
by Agreement of the Parties
(1) If the parties notify the Tribunal that they have agreed to
discontinue the proceeding, the Tribunal shall issue an order
taking note of the discontinuance.
(2) If the parties agree on a settlement of the dispute before the
Award is rendered, the Tribunal:
(a) shall issue an order taking note of the discontinuance of the
proceeding, if the parties so request; or
(b) may record the settlement in the form of an Award, if the
parties file the complete and signed text of their settlement
and request that the Tribunal embody such settlement in
an Award.
(3) An Award rendered pursuant to paragraph (2)(b) does not need
to include the reasons on which it is based.
(4) The Secretary-General shall issue the order referred to in
paragraphs (1) and (2)(a) if the Tribunal has not yet been
constituted or if there is a vacancy on the Tribunal.

Source : Overview of an Arbitration - ICSID Convention Arbitration (2022 Rules) | ICSID

TOKA MAKTABA :

Air Tanzania Plane Seized in the Netherlands Over Land Issues​

BYBABATUNDE OGUNTIMEHIN
DECEMBER 2, 2022



Air Tanzania Company Limited plane has been seized in the Netherlands after a Swedish firm won a $165 million award against Tanzania due to revoked land title in the Bagamoyo sugar project.
It is still not clear exactly which aircraft on ATCL’s fleet has been seized.
However, on Wednesday, the government dispelled fears of the possible attachment of an ATCL plane by a Dutch court, with the Attorney General saying everything was under control.
Attorney General of Tanzania, Dr Eliezer Feleshi confirmed that a Swedish firm that won a $165 million award against Tanzania had persuaded the court to uphold the attachment of the aircraft despite the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) having issued a stay of execution, pending annulment proceedings.

“It’s true that they went to court in the Netherlands after we had successfully appealed to the ICSID for a stay of execution. Everything is under control,” he said.

Dr Feleshi added that the government had already appealed against the Dutch court’s decision, but declined to offer further details.

“I can’t disclose further details…let’s be patient as the matter is in court.”

Tanzania has argued that the attachment is unlawful because it was obtained a day after the State had petitioned the ICSID to annul EcoDevelopment’s award.

The judge reasoned that the ICSID’s provisional stay of execution of the award only took effect on the date the institution registered the state’s annulment request.

The Swedish company is using the legal firm Houthoff in the Dutch courts, and Mannheimer Swartling in the ICSID proceedings.

Tanzania on the other hand has turned to Buren Legal for the attachment proceedings but has not appointed an external counsel in the arbitration or annulment proceedings.

EcoDevelopment, which is owned by 18 Swedish nationals, brought its ICSID claim in 2017 under the Sweden-Tanzania bilateral investment treaty.

That came after the government decided to unilaterally revoke the land title for a multi-billion sugar project in Bagamoyo.

The case commenced at the ICSID, a World Bank organ based in Washington.
 
Kwa hivyo we unadhani Magufuli alikuwa mwehu tu kulichukua hilo shamba bila ya sababu ya msingi.

Hakukuwa na mwekezaji serious hapo, jamaa alikuwa magumashi hana hela zaidi ya tapeli tu aliekuwa akihemea international funds za miradi kupitia ardhi ya Tanzania.




MoU ya hilo shamba imesainiwa toka 2006 na ukisoma hiyo report ya AfDB ilitakiwa by 2013 wawe washakamalisha zoezi la kuwaamisha watu waliokuwa na makazi humo.

Mpaka 2015 watu bado walikuwepo, makubaliano ilikuwa ni kuipa kila familia $12500 sawa na millioni tsh 25,000,000 za muda huo na kuwajengea nyumba za makazi. Mpaka 2015 hakuna kilichofanyika.

Walitoa ahadi ya kuvuna 125,000 tones ya miwa kila mwaka na kutumia kwenye kuzalisha sukari kuanzia 2013 hakuna walichofanya.

Walitoa ahadi ya kuzalisha 8000-15000m3 ya ethanol kupitia kilimo cha miwa hadi 2013 na kutumia kuzalishia umeme wa 100,000 Mwh na kuuzia TANESCO huo uwekezaji hakuna.

Tanzania sugar project leaves bitter taste for farmers caught up in land disputes | Ariel Zirulnick

A stalled scheme to make Tanzania east Africa’s premier sugar producer has polarised opinion about using large-scale agriculture to achieve food security
amp.theguardian.com

Wadau ☝️wa kimataifa waliowa ahidi (UN agriculture development) kuwapa $66m mpaka mwaka 2015 walikuwa awajatoa hizo hela, AfDB ilihahidi $30 awa kutoa kwa sababu wote wawili hawakuona jitihada zozote za maendeleo za kuridhisha kwenye uwekezaji na kuwapa hizo hela za mradi.

Eneo lenyewe serikali ya JK January 2015 ilitaka wachukue hectare 3000 zilizoingia ndani ya hifadhi ya taifa, kwa hivyo ata alikupimwa.

Sheria walizoingia nazo mkataba ni za Tanzania na raisi ni custodian wa ardhi.

Ni hivi hakukuwa na mwekezaji hapo ni mtu tu kwa kushirikiana na mafisadi alipewa lease ya miaka 99 ya ardhi baada ya hapo anatafuta deal za hela kupitia international funds. we ukienda kwenye hilo eneo ungeweza weka ushahidi wa $50m anazodai kawekeza tayari, una ushahidi wa shughuli za kilimo ambazo anadai ni loss of income, una ushahidi wa kuzalisha umeme hapo, una ushahidi wa fidia alizolipa au makazi aliyojenga.

Ni utapeli mtupu mwanzo mwisho, but then we have our ways in losing even simple cases kama hizi na kuwatajirisha hawa matapeli wakizungu.

Kinachokera ni pale wanapopata watetezi wa ndani.
 
Nchi haina dira wala mipango. Kila mchumia tumbo anakuja na lake ilimradi tu. Na sisi tupo tu tunabwabwaja.
 
Atakayekuja atavunja mkataba wa waarabu nae atalaumiwa sana. Wabongo ni shida
 
Selfish kuliko Nyerere aliyevamia Zanzibar na kuifanya ngawira ya Tanganyika?
 
wewe malya lala umhumie mmeo
 
Tukisema lile lilikuwa shetani hatari kabisa wafuasi wake wananuna
 
Lile shetani lenu la Chato lilikuwa hatari sana, nyonya damu za watu
 
Siku tunavunja mkataba na dip welidi baada ya kugundua waliwaonga watawala wetu tutawalipa nusu bajeti ya mwaka
 

Hii ni mizigo ya uongozi. Tunaingia uwekezaji na wawekezaji wa aina gani? Kwa mikataba gani?
Ujuaji unaoendelea unaonyesha kesi kama hizi zitakuwepo nyingi sana
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…