Pinda, Muungano, na Hatima ya Zanzibar

Pinda, Muungano, na Hatima ya Zanzibar

Dar Es Salaam said:
[FONT=Times,Times New Roman]"Without any question, the manner and the implications of the union between Tanganyika and Zanzibar is the most misunderstood aspect of Tanzania's political development. It may not matter very much when foreigners get confused, but unfortunately there are many times when Tanzanians themselves appear to misunderstand it."[/FONT] [FONT=Times,Times New Roman] [/FONT] [FONT=Times,Times New Roman]Former Tanzanian President Julius Nyerere.[/FONT] [FONT=Times,Times New Roman]Dar es Salaam Government Printer, July 1970. p. 3.[/FONT] [FONT=Times,Times New Roman] [/FONT] [FONT=Times,Times New Roman] [/FONT]
[FONT=Times,Times New Roman][SIZE=+1]INTRODUCTION[/SIZE][/FONT] When the former Tanzanian President Julius Kambarage Nyerere made the above address to his National Assembly that "the union between Zanzibar and Tanganyika is the most misunderstood aspects of Tanzanian's political development" proved that he is the only Tanzanian who knows "the manner and the implications of the union" after British colonialism in East Africa.
During the British colonialism, Zanzibar was the only intellectual center for Islamization of East African countries under the Zanzibar Sultanate. The Gofu and the Barza Mosques allowed students from the East African countries for the Islamic education. The Zanzibar Muslim Academy also offered the greatest hope for the vibrancy of Islam in East Africa. Nyerere, a devout Catholic saw that the Islamic Zanzibar state, a threat to Christianity. He masterminded a clandestine movement for the so called Zanzibar Revolution under the leadership of John Okello, a radical Christian from Uganda. It was not only a prelude to the creation of Tanzania, but a continuation of crusade against Islam and extension of Christian colonialism.



Source: http://victorian.fortunecity.com/portfolio/543/nyerere_and_islam.htm
Click to expand...

Maneno yako yana harufu ya ukadhi na OIC, maana ndio inaonekana ni maendeleo kuwa na vitu hivyo viwili! Kazi kucheza bao na kuota misaada toka uarabuni bila kufanya kazi!
 
Dar Es Salaam said:
[FONT=Times,Times New Roman]"Without any question, the manner and the implications of the union between Tanganyika and Zanzibar is the most misunderstood aspect of Tanzania's political development. It may not matter very much when foreigners get confused, but unfortunately there are many times when Tanzanians themselves appear to misunderstand it."[/FONT] [FONT=Times,Times New Roman] [/FONT] [FONT=Times,Times New Roman]Former Tanzanian President Julius Nyerere.[/FONT] [FONT=Times,Times New Roman]Dar es Salaam Government Printer, July 1970. p. 3.[/FONT] [FONT=Times,Times New Roman] [/FONT] [FONT=Times,Times New Roman] [/FONT]
[FONT=Times,Times New Roman][SIZE=+1]INTRODUCTION[/SIZE][/FONT] When the former Tanzanian President Julius Kambarage Nyerere made the above address to his National Assembly that "the union between Zanzibar and Tanganyika is the most misunderstood aspects of Tanzanian's political development" proved that he is the only Tanzanian who knows "the manner and the implications of the union" after British colonialism in East Africa.
During the British colonialism, Zanzibar was the only intellectual center for Islamization of East African countries under the Zanzibar Sultanate. The Gofu and the Barza Mosques allowed students from the East African countries for the Islamic education. The Zanzibar Muslim Academy also offered the greatest hope for the vibrancy of Islam in East Africa. Nyerere, a devout Catholic saw that the Islamic Zanzibar state, a threat to Christianity. He masterminded a clandestine movement for the so called Zanzibar Revolution under the leadership of John Okello, a radical Christian from Uganda. It was not only a prelude to the creation of Tanzania, but a continuation of crusade against Islam and extension of Christian colonialism.



Source: http://victorian.fortunecity.com/portfolio/543/nyerere_and_islam.htm
Click to expand...

Nimeenda kwenye source na nimekuta mwandishi ni Khatib M. Rajab al-Zinjibari. On that not unaweza kutupa back ground ya huyo mwandishi? Maana kama mwandishi wa source ni biased then article haina credibility. Ila tukijua background yake kidogo itasaidia.
 
MwanaFalsafa1 said:
Nimeenda kwenye source na nimekuta mwandishi ni Khatib M. Rajab al-Zinjibari. On that not unaweza kutupa back ground ya huyo mwandishi? Maana kama mwandishi wa source ni biased then article haina credibility. Ila tukijua background yake kidogo itasaidia.
Click to expand...

Na wale ana wa quote wote wako biased? Ukweli unauma!
 
MwanaFalsafa1 said:
Nimeenda kwenye source na nimekuta mwandishi ni Khatib M. Rajab al-Zinjibari. On that not unaweza kutupa back ground ya huyo mwandishi? Maana kama mwandishi wa source ni biased then article haina credibility. Ila tukijua background yake kidogo itasaidia.
Click to expand...

angalia matumizi ya maneno; niliisoma hiyo zamani sana na hakuna chembe ya objectivity zaidi ya hisia ya kuonewa na kuvunjwwa kwa ufalme mtukufu wa Sultani. Yaani, ni sumu kali ya machungu na kimsingi anawabebesha lawama kina Nyerere na Kanisa na kwa mbali kujaribu kutetea utawala wa Kisultani.
 
MwanaFalsafa1 said:
Mkuu not true. Si ndiyo tunaona yanayo tokea kwenye nchi kama Georgia? Hakuna nchi yoyote iliyo kuwa kwenye Soviet Union na ika badilika baada ya kujitenga. Tena zingine baada ya kujitenga na Urusi nazo zina kua na majimbo yanayo taka kujitenga. Kama una bisha toa mifano hai twende on a country to country basis halafu utaona.
Click to expand...

I told you they are in transitional economic. When in the fall of 1991, the old Soviet Union broke apart, leaving the former member republics to find their own way to economic reform. Most have chosen to move in the general direction of private business economies. This is a step most are ill prepared to take, however. Many important prerequisites for the transition from communism to capitalism are lacking in that region. Especially important are the attitudes and commitments of the leadership and the public for such a change. Most of the countries of Eastern Europe, on the other hand, have a considerable segment of the population that can vividly remember what their countries were like before the communist takeover after World War II. In addition, the process of economic reform in the Soviet area has been frequently interrupted by outbreaks of ethnic or nationalistic violence. Consequently, after a year of hesitating progress, the success of many programs seems in doubt.

Nevertheless, impressive progress in the role played by private business in the former Soviet Union was registered during the first twelve months since the breakup. Business enterprises enjoy substantial independence of operation, businessmen are free to start and develop private firms, and the prices businessmen charge for most commodities have been decontrolled. In addition, a unified exchange rate has been established in Russia for the ruble, making international business more possible. Western style advertising is finding the Russian public receptive rather than hostile. The lines at McDonalds are longer than those at Lenin's tomb, and western firms are encountering more and more success in negotiating contracts to supply technology and services. Witness the recent deal calling for Hughes Aircraft to equip remote Tatarstan with cellular and satellite telecommunications.

Enormous problems remain, however. In 1992, Russia's foreign trade fell a precipitous 27 percent from a year earlier, while industrial production dropped off 14 percent. At the same time, decontrol left consumer prices almost 10 fold higher than they were a year previously. Investment in early 1992 was only 56 percent of what it was in 1991. An unprecedented peacetime decline in public health has taken place. In addition, the birth rate has dropped precipitously and now is below the death rate.

As a result of these many factors, political opposition from groups like the "Civic Union," an alliance of old state-owned industry managers and leaders of former communist trade unions and the Party of Economic Freedom, which represents Russia's new businessmen, was being felt. The first group believed that only the existing managers can run the large industries, while the libertarians felt that Yeltsin's plans leave government with too much control. Although temporarily in opposition to the government, it was encouraging that private business interests had gained sufficient strength to be a meaningful political force.

Conditions were sufficiently favorable so that the Yeltsin government had not given up its plans for drastic reform of the economy. Although threatened by unwise central bank policy, the budget deficit was down from 20 percent of GDP in 1991 to 5 percent in mid-1992. The inflation rate had fallen to 10 percent per month from much higher previous numbers. Against this background, a voucher plan for privatizing state-owned ventures was started on October 1, 1992. A change of emphasis by the Yeltsin regime had taken place, however. The new approach stressed attempts to build consensus step by step rather than by executive degree. In addition, the very stringent credit policy had been moderated to ease social tensions.
 
Tatizo WaTanganyika tumewabeba lakini vichwa na miguu inaning'inia.
 
Shamu,

Ok hakuna haja ya kuandikia mate. Let's wait for the transition of those countries to end ili tuone maendeleo yao.
 
MwanaFalsafa1 said:
Then punish us please. Acheni kutubeba.
Click to expand...

Kuyachukua mafuta ya Zanzibar ni ufisadi ,sasa jamaa wameshageuza adhabu baada ya kuona mnapiga makelele sana na hamuelewi,ndio wamepasua jipu kabisa ,kuwa waheshimiwa Muungano sasa Zanzibar hawauvinji tena ila mafuta ndio hayakabidhiwi ndani ya Muungano.

Kikwete kasema hayapo ,haina haja ya kugombana ,Pinda kasema watu wagawane mbao tuone ?

Ila jawabu kutoka Ikulu Zanzibar ndio hio Muungano hauvunjwi uwepo kama ulivyo lakini hili kopo la girisi msahau kama limo ndani ya Muungano.Kama ilivyokuwa dhahabu na Almasi hazimo hivyo na haya nayo hayamo ,sasa makelele ya nini na kutishana ?
 
Zanzibar haina faida hata moja inayopata katika Muungano huu ,hawa vitimbakwiri walowezi mafisadi wameshamaliza hazina yao sasa wanairandia ya Zanzibar ila jamaa wameshasituka ,wanasema wacha muungano udumu utakavodumu lakini hazina ya Zanzibar itabaki kwa WaZanzibari tu ,na wameshaunda idara ya kuratibu na kusimamia mali na hazina ya Zanzibar bado kuitangaza rasmi ,

WaTanganyija wataona mambo yana badilika tu ,si unafahamu ule msemo wa akufukuzae hakwambii toka ? Ndio maana yake kwa sasa ,haambiwi mtu avunje Muungano wala kujadili mambo ya Muungano hata yakijadiliwa bado mbadiliko utaendela kidogokidago na hata kwa kasi ,kazi kwa waTanganyika kama watanyoa au watasuka.
 
Faida mojawapo ya muungano ni kuwa mtu upo huru kwenda zanzibar kutalii. Muungano ukivunjika sidhani kama sisi tuliotoka bara tutakuwa na uhuru wa kwenda kutalii zenji siku za weekend.
 
Pretty said:
Faida mojawapo ya muungano ni kuwa mtu upo huru kwenda zanzibar kutalii. Muungano ukivunjika sidhani kama sisi tuliotoka bara tutakuwa na uhuru wa kwenda kutalii zenji siku za weekend.
Click to expand...

Hivi Wabara wangapi huendaga Zanzibar kutalii? Kuna takwimu...?
 
Pretty said:
Faida mojawapo ya muungano ni kuwa mtu upo huru kwenda zanzibar kutalii. Muungano ukivunjika sidhani kama sisi tuliotoka bara tutakuwa na uhuru wa kwenda kutalii zenji siku za weekend.
Click to expand...

Utaruhusiwa kwenda, lakini itabidi utumie Passport. Ni kweli muungano haujaleta maendeleo yoyote. Bora uvunjwe tu.
 
mimi nakuulizeni nyinyi watanganyika hamkuwahi kusoma kwenye magazeti ya kuwa tz wametoa mamillion ya pesa usa kwajili ya kutengezewa marigigi ya kuchimbia mafuta mnajifanya au jk anawafanya watu wote ni wajinga wakati pesa wameshalipa sasa hayo marigi ya kuchimbia mafuta 300 ya nini na wakati hakuna mafuta kweli hakuna mafuta tanganyika lakini zenji ndio yapo tena mbona mengi tu inamaana wazenji hawajui hilo na ndio maana wameshikilia msimamo wao huo mlikuwa mnafanya siri watu wasijue lakini leo wenyewe ccm wenzenu ndio walosema haya mafuta yalikuwa yachimbwe zaman a mwaka yalipo gunduliwa ni 1920 na ulitokea mgongano tu wa sultani na uengereza na waka 1950 ilifanywa tena uchunguzi pia ikaonekana hivyo kwahiyo kama hakuna ya nini kuweka kwenye katiba ya muungano madhali mnasema hakuna basi kubalini tu na sio kutishana kwani hapo zamani vyakula zanzibar walikuwa wananunua wapi bara au mtaumia nyinyi wabara na sio sisi maana mtapigana kwa ukabila wezi wa mchana wakubwa
 
Nyani Ngabu said:
Hivi Wabara wangapi huendaga Zanzibar kutalii? Kuna takwimu...?
Click to expand...
Hakuna hata takwimu, maana tunaenda kama nyumbani tu, ndio maana mie naona faida mojawapo ya muungano.
Muungano ukivunjwa itabidi tuwe na passport, ila sasa ni raha tu muda wowote unaamua tu kupanda boti na kwenda zako zenji.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Our Community

Regional Communities

Back
Top Bottom
Menu
Forums
New posts
Log in
Register