Unless I'm terribly mistaken, and in dire need of a lobotomy, the Prof. passed away March last year.
As for the paper, it isn't among the Prof's best. The four pages can be accurately summarized in the four sentences: "
Extensive reliance on financial incentives permeates academia. Hardly anything takes place without an immediate or potential financial inducement. Basic responsibilities are cast aside or poorly fulfilled. Well-paid external work and donor funded projects have supplanted effective teaching and supervision of students".
Looking at the Tanzania of today, the Prof. was what one would call "economically self-sufficient", thanks to his many years of service, experience, and western universities connections. That being said, one might be tempted to argue that the above four sentences don't hold much water coming from him since, unlike most academicians, he had the luxury to say NO to "external work and donor funded projects". Then again, the Prof. had been against any form of neo-colonialism since as far back as 1990 (pg 37
http://www.codesria.org/IMG/pdf/2-_Brock-Utne.pdf) and yes, this observation is for naught unless the Prof. didn't have the aforementioned luxury then.
In the minds of today's youths and adults alike, the Prof's idea of self-worthiness and dignity simply doesn't ring a bell. Gone are the days when (most?) people would sum you up from your title (Dr., Eng., Prof., etc), your knowledge, and the likes. It's no longer about your title but what you have to show for your title. How many times do we hear words like "Doctor gani huyo bado anaishi kwenye nyumba ya kupanga, hata gari hana?" !!.
Ujamaa is long gone (not that it would be of much help here) and we are now sandwiched between globalization and materialism. The academicians often find themselves caught between two conflicting notions of upholding high teaching quality (say NO to "sycophancy", as the Prof. lightly put it )and having a better life quality (say YES to "sycophancy"). Selecting the former, which the Prof. urged them to do, means depriving one's self of what have now become the signatures of success (fancier-than-your-neighbour's house, bigger-than-you-need cars, complex-than-you-can-comprehend gadgets, etc ). And for that we would have to go back to the 1960s, not a very good deal now that we are way too happy celebrating 50 years of "independent sycophancy" !!.