Proposal and proposing

Proposal and proposing

T

The BornAgain

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2024
Posts
428
Reaction score
582
Based on concept:
A proposal regardless its agenda/theme, is a formal written document used to make right decisions (to think and decide).

Katika struggling zetu za maisha sometimes we need to make correct decisions before we go into action on anything: whether to invest money, or time or any other useful resource.

Kwamba A formal writeup is prepared by the owner of the idea or a specialist on the particular idea; say an economic idea, health idea, ICT and many more.

I. The Born Again, deals with any economic or community economic development writeups for one to decide on viable ideas.
Proposals husika naweza fanya based on findings from table work/literature review/secondary study or field study/primary study or both.
Kwahivyo unapowaza IDEA yoyote ya kimaendeleo which needs action, then think of getting a writeup for it. Regardless how small the idea is but things always start small then become big and bigger to biggest. Even if the idea is complex in nature, then writing will separate the complexity hence become easily consumed and decided.
Foreinstance rightnow I'm formalising someone's idea ..Land use proposal (there is an idle land somewhere, not his, but he wants to use it profitably..)
HAYO TU KWASASA: Interested? consult me 0652656565
 
Can you detail the methodologies anddd analytical frameworks you use in your proposals to evaluate and validate the feasibility of different dvp ideas or projects rafiki?
 
Zulu man said:
Sawa sawa,nitakukumbusha atakapotupatia.
Click to expand...
Though not exhaustive ila yaweza toa mwanga, mambo ni mengi.

I normally use the following Analytical methods in determining the feasibilities of projects:
1) Risk analysis
Here means to understand and to deal with possible risks which may negatively affect viability of the projects. The analysis includes the process of identifying the risks of undertaking the project, determining the probability of the risk identified (that's how effective they are) and lastly measuring the Impacts in the project if it at all will happen.
HENCE the lower the Risks rates the higher the viability of the project and vice versa.

2) Cost Benefit Analysis...
This is a data driven analysis for someone to make correct decisions on any development project. It guides the owner on the cost and the benefits of the projects when weighed simultaneously.
A formal CBA will identify and quantify all project costs and benefits, then calculates the expected Net Present Value (NPV), Return On Investment (ROI) and Payback Period.
NB: Project owners are motivated by the benefits and blocked by the costs before benefits. So the analysis when undergone efficiently the positive difference btn the two should favour benefits over costs for one to decide the viability of the project.

3) SWOT analysis: the Four quadrants that's STRENGTH, WEAKNESS, OPPORTUNITIES and THREATS if well studied helps the project owners to decide wisely on their projects.
The quadrants can be studied on the Owners themselves and the idea of the project as independent variables.
Here the quadrants STRENGTH and OPPORTUNITIES portrays the positive side of the project while the rest: WEAKNESS and THREATS portrays negative side of the project.
The good thing is, when identifying and studying the four quadrants one has to make sure S&O show the high possibility of undertaking the project while W&T though can be unavoidable but always one has to identify methods to make them less effective towards the project.
In here the if S&O are more practical to bring desired project goals than the W&T to affecting the project..the project is termed viable.

Kwa leo kiufupi fupi sana, hizo ni analytical methods nazotumia zaidi kwa kazi nilizofanya hadi zikapelekea kushauri mradi husika aufanyie kazi au aache au arekebishe nini. Sometimes kwa kadri ya mradi husika na mazingira njia itayotumika mhimu iwe relevant to study and expected deliverables.
 
The BornAgain said:
Though not exhaustive ila yaweza toa mwanga, mambo ni mengi.

I normally use the following Analytical methods in determining the feasibilities of projects:
1) Risk analysis
Here means to understand and to deal with possible risks which may negatively affect viability of the projects. The analysis includes the process of identifying the risks of undertaking the project, determining the probability of the risk identified (that's how effective they are) and lastly measuring the Impacts in the project if it at all will happen.
HENCE the lower the Risks rates the higher the viability of the project and vice versa.

2) Cost Benefit Analysis...
This is a data driven analysis for someone to make correct decisions on any development project. It guides the owner on the cost and the benefits of the projects when weighed simultaneously.
A formal CBA will identify and quantify all project costs and benefits, then calculates the expected Net Present Value (NPV), Return On Investment (ROI) and Payback Period.
NB: Project owners are motivated by the benefits and blocked by the costs before benefits. So the analysis when undergone efficiently the positive difference btn the two should favour benefits over costs for one to decide the viability of the project.

3) SWOT analysis: the Four quadrants that's STRENGTH, WEAKNESS, OPPORTUNITIES and THREATS if well studied helps the project owners to decide wisely on their projects.
The quadrants can be studied on the Owners themselves and the idea of the project as independent variables.
Here the quadrants STRENGTH and OPPORTUNITIES portrays the positive side of the project while the rest: WEAKNESS and THREATS portrays negative side of the project.
The good thing is, when identifying and studying the four quadrants one has to make sure S&O show the high possibility of undertaking the project while W&T though can be unavoidable but always one has to identify methods to make them less effective towards the project.
In here the if S&O are more practical to bring desired project goals than the W&T to affecting the project..the project is termed viable.

Kwa leo kiufupi fupi sana, hizo ni analytical methods nazotumia zaidi kwa kazi nilizofanya hadi zikapelekea kushauri mradi husika aufanyie kazi au aache au arekebishe nini. Sometimes kwa kadri ya mradi husika na mazingira njia itayotumika mhimu iwe relevant to study and expected deliverables.
Click to expand...
Mr Manyanza
 
The BornAgain said:
Though not exhaustive ila yaweza toa mwanga, mambo ni mengi.

I normally use the following Analytical methods in determining the feasibilities of projects:
1) Risk analysis
Here means to understand and to deal with possible risks which may negatively affect viability of the projects. The analysis includes the process of identifying the risks of undertaking the project, determining the probability of the risk identified (that's how effective they are) and lastly measuring the Impacts in the project if it at all will happen.
HENCE the lower the Risks rates the higher the viability of the project and vice versa.

2) Cost Benefit Analysis...
This is a data driven analysis for someone to make correct decisions on any development project. It guides the owner on the cost and the benefits of the projects when weighed simultaneously.
A formal CBA will identify and quantify all project costs and benefits, then calculates the expected Net Present Value (NPV), Return On Investment (ROI) and Payback Period.
NB: Project owners are motivated by the benefits and blocked by the costs before benefits. So the analysis when undergone efficiently the positive difference btn the two should favour benefits over costs for one to decide the viability of the project.

3) SWOT analysis: the Four quadrants that's STRENGTH, WEAKNESS, OPPORTUNITIES and THREATS if well studied helps the project owners to decide wisely on their projects.
The quadrants can be studied on the Owners themselves and the idea of the project as independent variables.
Here the quadrants STRENGTH and OPPORTUNITIES portrays the positive side of the project while the rest: WEAKNESS and THREATS portrays negative side of the project.
The good thing is, when identifying and studying the four quadrants one has to make sure S&O show the high possibility of undertaking the project while W&T though can be unavoidable but always one has to identify methods to make them less effective towards the project.
In here the if S&O are more practical to bring desired project goals than the W&T to affecting the project..the project is termed viable.

Kwa leo kiufupi fupi sana, hizo ni analytical methods nazotumia zaidi kwa kazi nilizofanya hadi zikapelekea kushauri mradi husika aufanyie kazi au aache au arekebishe nini. Sometimes kwa kadri ya mradi husika na mazingira njia itayotumika mhimu iwe relevant to study and expected deliverables.
Click to expand...
I like using SWOC, Strength weakness opportunities and challenges , hahaha 🤣
 
The BornAgain said:
Though not exhaustive ila yaweza toa mwanga, mambo ni mengi.

I normally use the following Analytical methods in determining the feasibilities of projects:
1) Risk analysis
Here means to understand and to deal with possible risks which may negatively affect viability of the projects. The analysis includes the process of identifying the risks of undertaking the project, determining the probability of the risk identified (that's how effective they are) and lastly measuring the Impacts in the project if it at all will happen.
HENCE the lower the Risks rates the higher the viability of the project and vice versa.

2) Cost Benefit Analysis...
This is a data driven analysis for someone to make correct decisions on any development project. It guides the owner on the cost and the benefits of the projects when weighed simultaneously.
A formal CBA will identify and quantify all project costs and benefits, then calculates the expected Net Present Value (NPV), Return On Investment (ROI) and Payback Period.
NB: Project owners are motivated by the benefits and blocked by the costs before benefits. So the analysis when undergone efficiently the positive difference btn the two should favour benefits over costs for one to decide the viability of the project.

3) SWOT analysis: the Four quadrants that's STRENGTH, WEAKNESS, OPPORTUNITIES and THREATS if well studied helps the project owners to decide wisely on their projects.
The quadrants can be studied on the Owners themselves and the idea of the project as independent variables.
Here the quadrants STRENGTH and OPPORTUNITIES portrays the positive side of the project while the rest: WEAKNESS and THREATS portrays negative side of the project.
The good thing is, when identifying and studying the four quadrants one has to make sure S&O show the high possibility of undertaking the project while W&T though can be unavoidable but always one has to identify methods to make them less effective towards the project.
In here the if S&O are more practical to bring desired project goals than the W&T to affecting the project..the project is termed viable.

Kwa leo kiufupi fupi sana, hizo ni analytical methods nazotumia zaidi kwa kazi nilizofanya hadi zikapelekea kushauri mradi husika aufanyie kazi au aache au arekebishe nini. Sometimes kwa kadri ya mradi husika na mazingira njia itayotumika mhimu iwe relevant to study and expected deliverables.
Click to expand...
Thanks,contact noted rafiki
 
Benny Haraba said:
I like using SWOC, Strength weakness opportunities and challenges , hahaha 🤣
Click to expand...
Uko sahihi...challenges takes place of Threats...kadri utandawazi unavyotawala ndivyo baadhi ya scenario zinabebwa na misamiati mbadala..current world inajifafanua zaidi kwenye Changamoto kuliko vihatarishi..lkn mindset inaleta ukaribu wa hizo concept...mfano sera mbovu inaweza kuwa hatari kwa mradi fulani..yani kuwepo kwa hiyo sera mbovu pia ni changamoto kwa maendeleo ya mradi huo. Kwenye hatari kunaweza muogopesha mwenye mradi wakati ikiwa kama changamoto basi changamoto haikimbiwi bali inakabiliwa positively ili itumike kama fursa/opportunity in a diversive way.
 
The BornAgain said:
Uko sahihi...challenges takes place of Threats...kadri utandawazi unavyotawala ndivyo baadhi ya scenario zinabebwa na misamiati mbadala..current world inajifafanua zaidi kwenye Changamoto kuliko vihatarishi..lkn mindset inaleta ukaribu wa hizo concept...mfano sera mbovu inaweza kuwa hatari kwa mradi fulani..yani kuwepo kwa hiyo sera mbovu pia ni changamoto kwa maendeleo ya mradi huo. Kwenye hatari kunaweza muogopesha mwenye mradi wakati ikiwa kama changamoto basi changamoto haikimbiwi bali inakabiliwa positively ili itumike kama fursa/opportunity in a diversive way.
Click to expand...
Nikweli hata mimi ni mdau naandika kitabu cha ujasiriamali fikirishi, chakimombo na kiswahili humo ndani kuna business plan, nitaweka business plan templates kama 2 hivi za biashara tofauti
 
Benny Haraba said:
Nikweli hata mimi ni mdau naandika kitabu cha ujasiriamali fikirishi, chakimombo na kiswahili humo ndani kuna business plan
Click to expand...
Safi kabisa...imekaa vema hio. Natamani kuandika kitabu cha Resource Mobilisation kwa taasisi ambazo ni not for profit. Nawaza market yake
 
The BornAgain said:
Safi kabisa...imekaa vema hio. Natamani kuandika kitabu cha Resource Mobilisation kwa taasisi ambazo ni not for profit. Nawaza market yake
Click to expand...
Jaribu kufanya utafiti wa soko lako anza kwa kuangalia, (kuwatambua), wapinzani wako ni wakina nani, primary and secondary competitors, nguvu zao zikoje mapungufu yao ukilinganisha na wewe, wateja wao ni wakina nani na wanaishi wapi, wateja wako taraji, (your prospective customers), kwa kufanya hivyo utapata picha kamili
 
Benny Haraba said:
Jaribu kufanya utafiti wa soko lako anza kwa kuangalia, (kuwatambua), wapinzani wako ni wakina nani, primary and secondary competitors, nguvu zao zikoje mapungufu yao ukilinganisha na wewe, wateja wao ni wakina nani na wanaishi wapi, wateja wako taraji, (your prospective customers), kwa kufanya hivyo utapata picha kamili
Click to expand...
Yeah hizo ndo basics. Poah
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Our Community

Regional Communities

Back
Top Bottom
Menu
Forums
New posts
Log in
Register