Hello brother, i'm not only a scientist but i have also watched about 1000hours of documentaries on origin of human and the origin of the universe and how it operates on discovery and online so i kinda find your comment offensive ila i'm gonna overlook them and go straight to the matter.
"hakuna ktk theory yoyote kuwa binadaamu alikuwepo hapa dunian kwa million years back" hii sio kweli"
Kwanza ungekua umepitia hiyo link niliyotoa mkuu usingekataa, pitia hiyo link kwanza brother, kuna fossils zake human predecessors dating as far as 4 to 6 million years back. eg
AL 444-2
Exhibit item
Site:
Hadar, Ethiopia
Date of discovery:
1992
Discovered by:
Yoel Rak
Age:
About 3 million years old
Species:
Australopithecus afarensis
Evidence of size differences
This large male skull was found at the same locality as the famous Lucy skeleton. It is much bigger than the skull of Lucy and other females of this species, indicating there were differences in body size between the sexes.
"being closer by dna with animals, it doesnt mean we are related to each other!! ( when it comes toz dna , human and pigs are very close by almost 90%) is that makes you and pigs like cousins??"
kuhusu PIGS kwanza elewa We didn't evolve from Apes bali tunashare Common ancestor, kwahiyo jinsi human anavyozidi ku evolve anazidi kutofautiana na his cousins "apes", sasa tukija kwenye swala la kitimoto kufanana sawa tunafanana (addition ndo maana viungo vya nguruwe vinatumika hata kwa transplant, i know that) ila when talking of being alike ni lazima useme what part of the genome are alike. Infact viungo vya nguruwe anawezatumia binadamu sababu 1st they are large and almost similar in size,2nd they have almost same biochemical processes thanks to the similarity in one of the gene. Ila We are long way from being identical, na hii statement scientists wanaclaim ni very mis leading maana Cats are around 90% similar (I believe) to humans and cows are about 80% I think the fruit fly shares about 60% of its DNA with the average human, but it all comes down to what part of the genome your talking about. Humans relate closely to apes baada ya kuangalia specific genome affected on evolution. FOR MORE DETAILS AND TECHNICAL EXPLANATIONS SOMA HII LINK EXPLAINING IN DEPTH HAYA MAELEZO NILIYOTOA.
Do pigs share 98 per cent of human genes? Ask an Expert (ABC Science)
Ndugu yangu, I didn't mean to offend anybody but! A lot of people are getting mislead by following science blindly without a solid evidence!!
If scientists told you anything without proof! Its your duty to go deep down to find out the fact about that theory!
And if you cant find the evidence, that theory remained as a theory! Until proven othewise!
How often do we see that the scientists are PROVEN WRONG??
I will give you few examples here!
One of the best aspects of science has always been its readiness to admit when it got something wrong.
Theories are constantly being refigured, and new research frequently renders old ideas outdated or incomplete. But this hasnt stopped some discoveries from being hailed as important, game-changing accomplishments a bit prematurely.
Even in a field as rigorous and detail-oriented as science, theories get busted, mistakes are made, and hoaxes are perpetrated.
The following are the most groundbreaking of these scientific discoveries that turned out to be resting on some questionable data.
It is worth noting that most of these concepts are not necessarily wrong in the traditional sense; rather, they have been replaced by other theories that are more complete and reliable.
1.The Discovery of Vulcan -
Vulcan was a planet that nineteenth century scientists believed to exist somewhere between Mercury and the Sun.
The mathematician Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier first proposed its existence after he and many other scientists were unable to explain certain peculiarities about Mercurys orbit.
Scientists like Le Verrier argued that this had to be caused by some object, like a small planet or moon, acting as a gravitational force.
La Verrier called his hypothetical planet Vulcan, after the Roman god of fire. Soon, amateur astronomers around Europe, eager to be a part of a scientific discovery, contacted Le Verrier and claimed to have witnessed the mysterious planet making its transit around the Sun.
For years afterward, Vulcan sightings continued to pour in from around the globe, and when La Verrier died in 1877, he was still regarded as having discovered a new planet in the solar system.
How it was Proven Wrong:
Without La Verrier acting as a cheerleader for Vulcans existence, it suddenly began to be doubted by many notable astronomers.
The search was effectively abandoned in 1915, after Einsteins theory of general relativity helped to explain once and for all why Mercury orbited the Sun in such a strange fashion.
But amateur stargazers continued the search, and as recently as 1970 there have been people who have claimed to see a strange object orbiting the sun beyond Mercury.
Amusingly, the entire would-be discoverys greatest legacy today is that it inspired the name of the home planet of the character Spock from Star Trek.
2.Spontaneous Generation -
Although it might seem a bit ludicrous today, for thousands of years it was believed that life regularly arose from the elements without first being formed through a seed, egg, or other traditional means of reproduction.
The main purveyor of the theory was Aristotle, who based his studies on the ideas of thinkers like Anaximander, Hippolytus, and Anaxagoras, all of whom stressed the ways in which life could spontaneously come into being from inanimate matter like slime, mud, and earth when exposed to sunlight.
Aristotle based his own ideas on the observation of the ways maggots would seemingly generate out of dead animal carcass, or barnacles would form on the hull of a boat.
This theory that life could literally spring from nothing managed to persist for hundreds of years after Aristotle, and was even being proposed by some scientists as recently as the 1700s. How it was Proven Wrong:
It was only with the adoption of the scientific method that many of the classical theories like spontaneous generation began to be tested.
Once they were, they quickly crumbled. For example, famed scientist Louis Pasteur showed that maggots would not appear on meat kept in a sealed container, and the invention of the microscope helped to show that these same insects were formed not by spontaneous generation but by airborne spread.
3.-Geocentric universe:
The concept that the Earth was at the center of the universe dates back to at least 600 B.C. with Greek philosophers who proposed cosmologies of the Sun, Moon and other heavenly bodies orbiting the Earth. The most famous contortion of the system was-Ptolemys epicycles-to explain the retrograde motion of Mars.
This is a prime example of fitting scientific evidence into preconceived notions.
The theory was disproven with the publication of Nicholas Copernicus-De revolutionibus orbium coelestium-in 1543.
4.-Miasmatic theory of disease:
This theory holds that diseases such as cholera, chlamydia or the Black Death were caused by a miasma (ancient Greek: pollution), a noxious form of bad air.
This concept was not disposed of until the late 1800s, with the rise of the-germ theory of disease.
Miasma was considered to be a poisonous vapor or mist filled with particles from decomposed matter that caused illnesses. It was identifiable by its foul smell.
5.-Luminiferous aether:
Assumed to exist for much of the 19th century, the theory held that a medium of aether pervaded the universe through which light could propagate. The celebrated-Michelson-Morley experiment-in 1887 was the first to provide hard evidence that aether did not exist, and the theory lost all popularity among scientists by the1920s. A photo of the aether appears below.
6.-Stress theory of ulcers:
As peptic ulcers became more common in the 20th century, doctors increasingly linked them to the stress of modern life.-Medical advice-during the latter half of the 20th century was, essentially, for patients to take antacids and modify their lifestyle. In the 1980s Australian clinical researcher Barry Marshal discovered that the bacterium-H. pylori-caused peptic ulcer disease,-leading him to win a Nobel Prize-in 2005.
7.-Immovable continents:
Prior to the middle of the 20th century scientists believed the Earths continents were stable and did not move. This began to change in 1912 with Alfred Wegeners formulation of the continental drift theory, and later and more properly the elucidation of-plate tectonics-during the 1950s and 1960s.
8.Phlogiston:
Arising in the mid-17th century, physicians conjured up the existence of a fire-like element called phlogiston, which was contained within combustible bodies and released during combustion. Charcoal, for example, left little residue upon burning because it is nearly pure phlogiston.
Experiments in the mid-1700s led chemists to conclude the theory was false, giving birth to the field of modern chemistry.
So you see brother! To take sciences as the only guidance could lead us in a place where we could regret!
I try always to be on safe side!
And that is TO BELIEVE IN ONE GOD! AND TO OBEY HIM ONLY!
And that is ALLAH!
Cause by doing that! I believe there is nothing to loose rather than a lot to gain!
Adios my friend! !
And again I am sorry if I offended you in anyway!
But a believer like myself, saying that"apes and myself ARE COUSINS" That could offend me too!
I believe Apes are Apes and Human are Humans, and thats it! No ifs and buts!
And NO ONE EVER PROOF OTHERWISE.
thanks for reading a looong thread!
