Editorial: Stranded students: Send fees, not cover up errors
HIGHER learning loans authorities have another embarrassing encounter in a short while after the stiff neck face off about the University of Dar es Salaam and its several affiliate colleges.
This time the cry is coming from afar, in the former Soviet republic of the Ukraine, with Tanzanian students said to be camped, or rather in refuge, at the UK High Commission. Not surprisingly the local scene has been ignited by the situation, with the opposition parties? leaders, practicing their newfound unity, addressing the issue together.
What seems to be the case is surprisingly clear enough for anyone to see through except the responsible ministry, either having erred in the first place to send students for studies, or erring now in backtracking on a promise.
Chances that 29 students or so would out of nowhere find themselves in such a distant place as the Ukraine, having identical promises of obtaining loans from the ministry (or rather the loans board) means their cases are the same. There would be variations in the failure to pay if they were private, not all of them.
Additionally, the Ukraine is so far away from this country, and scarcely a zone of likely emigration objective for someone to suspect that personal initiative outside official say on fees occurred. No one can take risks of traveling to such a far away place without actual assurance of fees arriving at a later date, and presume he would burden the government with his fees once his parent fails to pay. If anyone now says this was the case, one has to look twice in his eyes, to see if he perhaps has a reason not to be telling the whole truth.
That is why it is surprising that a few people, perhaps used to the Bongo method of living by cheating, are seeking to leaving about two dozen students high and dry to cover up for their own mistakes. Seeming to be harsh is a schoolmasterly habit that is often handy to cover up ones own failures, in the absence of contingences within the ministry to respond to the problem. It is a way of trapping public authorities to come to the rescue, and then use informal channels within the ministry to clear out the blaming that surfaced.
NCCR Mageuzi chairman James Mbatia even suggested that three of the students had their fees cleared in the past few days, or obtained cheques for the same, after kitu kidogo was paid back home, though naturally he did not have to substantiate. Assuming that he was in a position to verify his statement, or at least cause enough to cite it as an example ? since the government didnt say there are three genuine cases of late sending of payments ? it might make sense. It would amplify the picture of incompetence arising.
In the final analysis the ministry or its higher learning loans instrument needs to know that those whose welfare is more affected by a ruling on an unclear engagement on any issue are supposed to be given the benefit of doubt. The ministry or the board might insist that there was something conditional to sending the loans, or as it was the case with the recent stand off, how assured it was that it would cover all their needs. Since the students are far away from here, a certain amount of indulgence is acceptable in how the ministry moves to interpret their demands, as the ministry facilitated their taking the risk for good cause.
It is unfair to act as if the students were right here, penalizing them the return ticket, etc, as the right and proper thing to do is to facilitate their studies, on the basis of what they comprehended to be the case. As they did not arrange for the journey themselves but were in actual fact sent, it is pointless for the loans board or the ministry to renegotiate with them the terms of their going there. If there were any conditions they were required to fulfill, these would have been done before their visas were processed, without ifs or buts.