Special Thread: Yanayojiri Mgogoro wa Ukraine na Urusi. Nini chanzo na hatma ya mzozo?

Ndipo akili zenu ziliposhia!Hao Afghan walikuwa na silaha gani za maana?Walipewa msaada na mataifa mangapi ya silaha,intelegensia na mafunzo?
Pamoja na kukosa yote hayo,US kaondoka Kwa aibu!

hujajibu swali bro.
nahapa narudia swali langu.


USA ilipoteza askar wangap. kwenye hio vita
hio afganistan waliikalia miaka mingap? au
vipi ulitaka wangeikalia kwa miaka mingap maxmum?. au ulitaka wasiondoke waifanye nchi yao mazima?

ukisha jibu ndo ulete hizo blabla.
 
UK missiles captured by Russia for Iran 'do not contain cutting-edge technology'
"Fundamentally, that is the risk we took when we decided it was important to help Ukraine," Defence Secretary Ben Wallace tells Sky News - adding it is not a major concern as the weapons do not contain cutting edge technology.
By Deborah Haynes, Security and Defence Editor @haynesdeborah

Friday 11 November 2022 08:47, UK

It is a known risk that Russia could send captured British anti-tank missiles meant for Ukraine to Iran, the defence secretary has said.

Given that they do not contain cutting-edge technology, however, it would not be a major concern if they fell into Iranian hands, Ben Wallace told Sky News.

At the same time, Britain and other NATO allies were enjoying an "amazing opportunity" to learn about President Vladimir Putin's military capabilities from Russian weapons captured by the Ukrainians, he said.

Given that they do not contain cutting-edge technology, however, it would not be a major concern if they fell into Iranian hands, Ben Wallace told Sky News.

At the same time, Britain and other NATO allies were enjoying an "amazing opportunity" to learn about President Vladimir Putin's military capabilities from Russian weapons captured by the Ukrainians, he said.

Putin 'basically stuck' and running out of options - Ukraine updates

Mr Wallace said the UK was looking into a Sky News report this week that Moscow had flown British and US anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles to Tehran along with 140m euros (£122m) in August, which they exchanged for dozens of deadly drones set to be used against Ukraine.

The NLAW, Javelin and Stinger munitions had been intended for the Ukrainian military but had fallen into Russian hands, according to a security source.

"Of course, we don't want to see these things happening," Mr Wallace said. "But fundamentally, that is the risk we took when we decided it was important to help Ukraine."

It also worked both ways, with the UK and other NATO allies able to learn from Russian weapons captured by the Ukrainians.

"Russia has lost significant numbers of its A-grade capabilities - they've been captured in the hundreds and thousands," Mr Wallace said.

That is an amazing opportunity for NATO countries to understand the technologies that go on in Russian equipment and that will give us a very strategic advantage in the future."

As for the NLAW anti-tank missiles that the UK has given to Ukraine, they are hugely effective pieces of kit, but they are not fitted with next generation technology, which the UK is currently working on, the defence secretary said.

"That will mean there'll be differences in it between what the Iranians - if they do have NLAWs - develop and what we have and that goes the same for the US Javelins… So, I'm not particularly worried. But of course, it was a risk we took as a calculation."

He added: "Iran has a track record of reverse engineering. It's always been very cunning at taking technologies from abroad and trying to turn it into its own capabilities.

"And indeed, the Ukrainian captured Iranian drones that we've seen on the TV that shows a significant number of western components within."
 
[emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787]
[https://whdh]

Russian Emergency Situations Ministry workers disassemble a destroyed building in Mariupol, in territory under the government of the Donetsk People's Republic, eastern Ukraine, Friday, May 27, 2022. (AP Photo/Alexei Alexandrov)

KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — Russia said it began withdrawing troops from a strategic Ukrainian city Thursday, creating a potential turning point in the grinding war, while a Ukrainian official warned that Russian land mines could render Kherson a “city of death.”

Ukrainian officials acknowledged Moscow’s forces had no choice but to flee Kherson, yet they remained cautious, fearing an ambush. With Ukrainian officials tight-lipped with their assessments, reporters not present and spotty communications, it was difficult to know what was happening in the port city, where the residents who remained after tens of thousands fled were afraid to leave their homes.

A forced pullout from Kherson — the only provincial capital Moscow captured after invading Ukraine in February — would mark one of Russia’s worst war setbacks. Recapturing the city, whose pre-war population was 280,000, could provide Ukraine a launching pad for supplies and troops to try to win back other lost territory in the south, including Crimea, which Moscow seized in 2014.

Ukrainian forces seem to be scoring more battlefield successes elsewhere in the Kherson region and closing in on the city. President Volodymyr Zelenskky said Thursday night the pace has increased so much that residents “are now checking almost every hour where our units have reached and where else our national flag was raised.”

The armed forces commander-in-chief, Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, said Kyiv’s forces have advanced 36.5 kilometers (22.7 miles) and retaken 41 villages and towns since Oct. 1 in the province, which the Kremlin has illegally annexed. That included 12 settlements on Wednesday alone.

Ukrainian presidential adviser Mykhailo Podolyak said Russian troops laid mines throughout Kherson as they withdrew to turn it into a “city of death” and predicted they would shell it after relocating across the Dnieper River.

From these new positions, the Kremlin could try to escalate the 8 1/2-month war, which U.S. assessments showed may already have killed or wounded tens of thousands of civilians and hundreds of thousands of soldiers.

Arkadiy Dovzhenko, who fled Kherson in June, said his grandparents still living there told him Thursday that “the Russians were bringing a lot of equipment into the town and also mining every inch of it.”

Zelenskyy said Thursday night his forces were racing to remove land mines from 170,000 square meters (65,637 square miles) nationwide, and planned also to do so in Kherson. A spokeswoman for Ukraine’s southern military, Natalia Humeniuk, said on Ukrainian television that resistance forces working behind enemy lines “carefully collect information” about critical infrastructure threatened by mines.

Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu ordered a troop withdrawal from Kherson and nearby areas on Wednesday after his top general in Ukraine reported that a loss of supply routes during Ukraine’s southern counteroffensive made a defense “futile.”

Shoigu’s ministry reported Thursday a “maneuver of units of the Russian group” to the Dnieper River’s eastern bank, also known as its left bank.

On Thursday, Ukrainian officials appeared to soften the skepticism they had expressed over whether the Russians were really on the run or trying to trap Ukraine’s soldiers. “The enemy had no other choice but to resort to fleeing,” armed forces chief Zaluzhny said, because Kyiv’s army destroyed supply systems and disrupted Russia’s local military command.

Still, he said the Ukrainian military could not confirm a Russian withdrawal.

Alexander Khara, of the Kyiv-based think tank Center for Defense Strategies, echoed those concerns, saying he remained fearful that Russian forces could destroy a dam upriver from Kherson and flood the city’s approaches. The former Ukrainian diplomat also warned of booby traps and other possible dangers.

“I would be surprised if the Russians had not set up something, some surprises for Ukraine,” Khara said.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, who just over a month ago celebrated the annexation of Kherson and three other Ukrainian regions and vowed to defend them by any means, has not commented on the withdrawal.

A resident said Kherson was deserted Thursday and that explosions could be heard from around Antonivskiy Bridge — a key Dnieper River crossing that Ukrainian forces have repeatedly bombarded.

“Life in the city seems to have stopped. Everyone has disappeared somewhere and no one knows what will happen next,” said Konstantin, a resident whose last name was withheld for security reasons.

He said Russian flags have disappeared from the city’s administrative buildings, and no signs remain of the Russian military personnel who earlier moved into the apartments of evacuated residents. Russian state news agency Tass reported that emergency services such as police officers and medical workers would leave along with the last Russian troops.

Halyna Lugova, head of the Ukrainian administration of Kherson city, told Ukrainian television Thursday that the Russian military was moving vehicles towards the Antonivskiy Bridge. Lugova, who is now based in Ukrainian-controlled territory, described conditions in the city as brutal.

Kherson remains without power, heating and internet service, gas stations in the city are closed, and there is no fuel, she said. The city also has run out of medications for cancer and diabetes patients. Ukrainian news reports said the Russians blew up the local television center, some of the cellphone towers and energy infrastructure.

Ukrainian officials have been cautious at other times in declaring victories against a Russian force that at least initially outgunned and outnumbered Ukraine’s armed forces.

Orysia Lutsevych, head of the Ukraine Forum at international affairs think-tank Chatham House, said the reticence explains “why, until Ukrainians are in the city, they don’t want to declare that they have it (in) control.”

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was similarly cautious. He spoke to Zelenskyy on Thursday, and his office said they agreed “it was right to continue to exercise caution until the Ukrainian flag was raised over the city.”

Army Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Wednesday he believed a retreat was underway, but that Russia had amassed as many as 30,000 troops in Kherson and that a full withdrawal could take several weeks.

One analyst noted that the Ukrainian army has destroyed bridges and roads as part of its counteroffensive, making a quick transfer of Russian troops across the Dnieper River impossible.

“The main question is whether the Ukrainians will give the Russians the opportunity to calmly withdraw, or fire at them during the crossing to the left bank,” Ukrainian military analyst Oleh Zhdanov said. “The personnel can be taken out on boats, but the equipment needs to be taken out only on barges and pontoons, and this is very easily shelled by the Ukrainian army.”

Putin’s allies rushed to defend the retreat as tough, but necessary. However, Pro-Kremlin political analyst Sergei Markov broke ranks and described the move as “Russia’s biggest geopolitical loss since the collapse of the Soviet Union” and warned that “political consequences of this huge loss will be really big.”

___

Karmanau reported from Tallinn, Estonia. Raf Casert contributed from Brussels. Jill Lawless contributed from London. Andrew Katell contributed from New York.

(Copyright (c) 2022 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.)
 

kwa hio kwa mujibu wa akili za pro russia ni sawa kusema russia anashambuliwa na mataifa 30+ kujijumlisha na yeye mwenyewe russia.

yaan putin anaungana na ukraine kujishambulia mwenyewe.

maana pro russia wanasema kumchangia silaha ukraine ni sawa na kupambana na hayo mataifa wachangiaji.
 
Medvedev 💥

UN General Assembly adopted a non-binding resolution on compensation by Russia for damages to Ukraine. Conclusions:

1. The Anglo-Saxons are clearly trying to scrape together a legal basis for the theft of illegally seized Russian assets.

2. Let them accept the same recommendation about the full compensation of the USA for damages to Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Yugoslavia and other numerous victims of the Americans and NATO.

3. Otherwise, it looks like the beginning of the UN's death throes as the main international reconciliation institution. The end will be painful for the entire international community. We will live without such an organization of the "united nations" ...

Talk to people with common sense 😎...
 
Kumbee. Hakuna Kama Ka 52 duniani baba. Hizo weakness Ni za kawaida TU kwa silaha yoyote. Kudondokewa kws ks 52 si sababu ya kuidunisha Kama wafanyavyo MSM.
Hata Apache gunship Kama itakutana na airdefences system kila mahala haitasavaivu downing.
Ukraine Ina manpad maelfu si ajabu ka 52 kuangushwa

Sent from my TECNO RA7 using JamiiForums mobile app
 
iran imefanikiwa kupata technology ya makombora ya hypasonic kabla ya marekani marekani kila ikijaribu yanaishia kufeli [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
Iran Kwa uongo Hana tofauti na CCM,alishaonyeshaga kwamba ana stealth fighter jet ikaja kugundulika ni fake. Sasa hivi kaja na upepo wa Hypersonic sina Shaka nayo itakua ni ya mchongo tu. Haya manchi ya kidikteta hua na tabia ya kujisifu na silaha fulani ili kuwatia hofu adui zao,mfano mzuri Russia Yale masilaha ya kwenye magwaride hatuoni yakileta tofauti yoyote Kwa battlefield.

Iran’s Stealth Fighter Is Still Fake and Not Convincing Anyone
Iran's military unveiled a new version of its homebuilt Qaher F313 fighter jet last weekend, but a drive down the runway revealed it's far from ready for flight.

A mysterious airplane that the Iranian government claims is its first stealth fighter prototype has reappeared after a more than three-year absence.

The Qaher F313 that first appeared on Iranian state media in February 2013 was clearly not a flyable warplane. It was, instead, a mock-up—one that either represented a functional future jet… or was purely for show. A propaganda prop.

The version of the Qaher F313 that reappeared on April 15, 2017 is also fake, albeit less obviously. Unlike the 2013 model, the 2017 model can move under its own power.

But it's still just a mock-up. We can reasonably assert this because the engineers who built the 2017 fake, following standard procedure, dutifully stenciled the plane's standard tire pressure on the fuselage. And that pressure is way too low for a real jet.

In other words, Iran is apparently no closer to developing a working stealth fighter than it was three years ago.

Iran’s Stealth Fighter Is Still Fake and Not Convincing Anyone

What Became of Iran's Qaher F-313 Fake Stealth Fighter?

Iran's 'stealth' fighter is a total joke
 
Hahahaha ndio Mkuu maana Russia ni mmoja wa wachangiaji wakubwa wa silaha kwa Ukraine
 
Kipindi Iran inatungua drone kubwa ya marekani ikaiita propaganda hivi hivi baadae ikajulikana kuwa NI kweli mkakimbia jukwaa
 
Duuuh,Endelea kufungia akili Yako ndani ya box!Kwa hilo mko vizuri!
Yaani unataka comparison wakati Huo huo hutaki comparison!
 
Huyo Russia unaem underestimate ndio yule mbabe wa ulimwengu ambaye kila taifa lenye dalili za kuwa na umagharibi humuogopa.
Ni Russia TU inayosababisha Ulaya nzima ijiunge na NATO ili angalau kujihakikishia usalama.
Kwenye ishu ya silaha Hakuna kifaru ambacho hakidunguliki kwa ATGM.
Hakuna ndege Vita isiyodungulika kwa MANPADS.
Hakuna artillery yoyote ya kirusi Wala ya Kimarekani isiyoua.
Nb kwenye ishu Kama za magari West wako mbele Sana na si sababu ya kuidunisha Russia kwenye hiyo sekta.
Russia inazalisha kila aina ya magari Malory , mabasi nk
Russia Ni mzalishaji mkuu was mbolea duniani.
Russia Ni mzalishaji wa kutegemewa ngano worldwide.


Sent from my TECNO RA7 using JamiiForums mobile app
 
Nipe mfano wa vita aliyopigana US inayokaribia kufanana na hii ya Russia na Ukraine!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…