😃😃😃😃,basi tuishie hapa Kwa Leo!Aisee,aibu nimeona Mimi!!!!Usiku mwema muraa!Hakuna cha mfano hapo. Vita ni vita muraaaaa.
Russia inapigana na Ukraine kama ambavyo USA alishapigana na Iraq, Vietnam,nk.
Kwako pia muraaaaa.[emoji2][emoji2][emoji2][emoji2],basi tuishia hapa Kwa Leo!Aisee,aibu nimeona Mimi!!!!Usiku mwema muraa!
Hawakawii kusema ni teknolojia ya kizamani....[emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji1787]View attachment 2416843
Russia handed a British anti-tank missile it had captured in Ukraine to Iran as part of an exchange deal for drones, it has been claimed.
The next-generation light anti-tank weapon (NLAW) is said to have been was flown to Tehran on a Russian military cargo plane with £120 million ($139m) in cash. The shipment also included a Javelin anti-tank missile and a Stinger anti-aircraft defence system the US had donated to Kyiv.
In return, Russia received dozens of deadly drones which it uses to target energy infrastructure and civilians in Ukraine.
READ MORE
Ukraine has shot down 300 Iranian drones, air force says
The flight landed at an airport in the Iranian capital in the early hours of August 20, according to a security source who spoke to Sky News. The insider claimed the weapons had been destined for Ukrainian troops but “fell into Russian hands”.
Satellite images appear to correlate the anonymous source’s timing, showing two Russian aircraft at Mehrabad airport at 1.17am after flying in under the cover of darkness. The planes remained on the tarmac for around three hours before departure.
The money was said to have been delivered in euros.
The trade between Moscow and Tehran has led to fears Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) could gain valuable insights into the western state-of-the-art weaponry and potentially create imitations of its own.
“They will probably be reverse-engineered and used in future wars,” the source was quoted by the TV channel as saying.
[https://thenational-the-national-prod]
A Ukrainian border guard carries an NLAW donated by the UK. AFP
Britain has donated more than 5,000 NLAWs to Ukraine and the weapons have played a major role in Ukraine’s resistance to invading forces.
Employing a soft-launch-guided system with predictable line-of-sight guidance, the system can take out tanks with a single shot.
Weighing 12 kilograms and measuring less than a metre in length, the shoulder-launched compact weapons has a range of up to 800m.
Training in how to use the missiles takes less than a day and they can be transported easily, a critical factor for Ukrainian troops on the ground.
As part of the deal with Iran, Russia received 160 unmanned aerial vehicles including 100 Shahed-136 kamikaze drones.
Ukraine has in recent weeks reported a spike in drones attacks. In October, the kamikaze drones were used in cities including the capital Kyiv as well as Lviv and Dnipro, attacking energy infrastructure and civilian areas.
The drones are piloted from the ground and explode on impact, providing a cheap alternative to cruise missiles.
A new deal worth £175 million has been agreed between Russia and Iran for another batch of drones, Sky News reported.
“That means there will be another big supply of UAVs from Iran soon,” the source said.
Russia denies its forces have used Iranian drones to attack Ukraine.
Iran has denied claims it agreed to supply Moscow with ballistic missiles.
Iran developed its drone technology after capturing a US drone in 2011, the source said.
“It seems that Iran also wants to benefit from the war [in Ukraine] by receiving from the Russians western capabilities that will be useful for them in the future — as happened in the past,” the insider said.
On Tuesday night, Vadym Prystaiko, the Ukrainian ambassador to the UK, expressed concern about the report, and said Iran sending drones to Russia posed a real threat to his country.
A senior government source did not deny the Sky News report when approached by The Telegraph.
The UK Ministry of Defence said it was urgently trying to verify the claims made by Sky News on Tuesday.
“We have not had a chance to go through it [the report] yet and clarify anything that has been alleged. We are trying to assess this and verify the report,” said a British military source.
In light of the report, western powers are likely to pressure Iran to avoid any future deals with Russia.
The two countries are increasingly seen as outcasts among the international community and have in recent months enjoyed closer ties.
On Tuesday night, it was reported Nikolai Patrushev, Russia’s national security adviser, had arrived in Tehran for meetings with the head of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council.
Earlier this week a Farsi-language TV channel based in London claimed members of the IRGC were planning to assassinate some of its British-Iranian journalists.
Protesters against the Iranian regime this week urged King Charles to shut down Iran’s embassy in London while the monarch was in Bradford during a tour of Yorkshire.
What are Iran's kamikaze drones being used in Ukraine? — video
What are Iran's kamikaze drones being used in Ukraine?
Iran and Russia 'doubling down' on partnership
Nicholas Carl, Middle East portfolio manager at the American Enterprise Institure’s Critical Threats Project, called the reports “surprising” but nevertheless “very plausible”.
Mr Carl, who specialises in Iranian security, said the balance of power in the partnership between Moscow and Tehran has changed in recent months as Iran assumes a more important role.
“What's particularly noteworthy about how the Russo-Iranian relationship has changed over the past couple of months, is that the Iranians are increasingly keen on a strategic rebalancing of this partnership,” he said.
“It has historically been the case that Iran has very obviously been the junior partner, whereas Moscow has been more dominant. Now things are changing.”
He cited the recent announcement by Iran’s supreme national security council secretary that Nikolai Patrushev, his counterpart in the Kremlin, had arrived in Tehran.
“Iranian state media emphasised that this guy had gone there,” Mr Carl said. “The Iranians are eager to boast that now the Russians come to them.
“So as we see these two parties, Moscow and Tehran, double down on their strategic partnership, expanding their economic and military cooperation, the Iranians are thinking through in what ways they can make it a more equal alignment.”
He said Tehran is “deeply invested” in working with revisionist powers like Moscow and Beijing to push back against the US.
As Russia’s munitions continue to deplete and their need for drones and missiles increases, Iran is likely to seize the opportunity to fill the gap, he said.
“That raises the question, what are the Russians going to be providing for the Iranians? As the Iranian support for the Russian war effort expands, or potentially expands I should say, it's an open question.”
He said the capabilities of specific western-made weapons which the Russians have is a topic unlikely to be raised in discussions with Iran. Instead, he said authorities in the Islamic republic are asking themselves what the Russians can do for them on a broader scale.
“That's not typically what I see the Iranians discussing in the open source when they are talking about what it is that they're doing and what it is that they're looking to get from the Russians,” he said.
“They instead have placed a lot of emphasis on the degree to which the Russians can provide them with fourth generation fighter jets, or earlier this year we saw the Russians launch a military satellite to space on behalf of Iran. That was also a huge interest of theirs for a while.”
Updated: November 09, 2022, 8:19 PM
View attachment 2416846
Ndo walichomaanisha hata hivyoHawakawii kusema ni teknolojia ya kizamani....
Ni kama mwaka 2007 ,mandonga alipoona USA kapiga watelebani kwa bomu kubwa kabisa lijulikanalo kwa jina la Mother of all bombs (MOAB).Naye akasema ametengeneza father of all bombs .CIA wakasema ni fake , Putin akalionesha kwenye gwaride ila hakuwah kutest.Sasa leo kama angekua nalo si angepiga huko ukraine maana hakuna kombora ambalo mandonga hajatumia Ukraine .Ndio maana wanamhofia atageukia nuke ,hii midicteta huwa ina mikwara sana.Nakumbuka nikiwa shule ya msingi tuliaminishwa sadamu anaweza kuangamiza dunia nzima kwa silaha zake za kibaiology.kumbe mikwara tuu.sasa hivi story imehamia kwa mandonga kuwa nyuklia alizonazo anaweza kuangamiza dunia nzima.Ngoja tuone hii pichaIran Kwa uongo Hana tofauti na CCM,alishaonyeshaga kwamba ana stealth fighter jet ikaja kugundulika ni fake. Sasa hivi kaja na upepo wa Hypersonic sina Shaka nayo itakua ni ya mchongo tu. Haya manchi ya kidikteta hua na tabia ya kujisifu na silaha fulani ili kuwatia hofu adui zao,mfano mzuri Russia Yale masilaha ya kwenye magwaride hatuoni yakileta tofauti yoyote Kwa battlefield.
Iran’s Stealth Fighter Is Still Fake and Not Convincing Anyone
Iran's military unveiled a new version of its homebuilt Qaher F313 fighter jet last weekend, but a drive down the runway revealed it's far from ready for flight.
A mysterious airplane that the Iranian government claims is its first stealth fighter prototype has reappeared after a more than three-year absence.
The Qaher F313 that first appeared on Iranian state media in February 2013 was clearly not a flyable warplane. It was, instead, a mock-up—one that either represented a functional future jet… or was purely for show. A propaganda prop.
The version of the Qaher F313 that reappeared on April 15, 2017 is also fake, albeit less obviously. Unlike the 2013 model, the 2017 model can move under its own power.
But it's still just a mock-up. We can reasonably assert this because the engineers who built the 2017 fake, following standard procedure, dutifully stenciled the plane's standard tire pressure on the fuselage. And that pressure is way too low for a real jet.
In other words, Iran is apparently no closer to developing a working stealth fighter than it was three years ago.
Iran’s Stealth Fighter Is Still Fake and Not Convincing Anyone
What Became of Iran's Qaher F-313 Fake Stealth Fighter?
Iran's 'stealth' fighter is a total joke
Una akili isiyofanya kaz ya ziada kufikiri,hizo satelite anazorusha mbona india nso wanarusha ,ghana walirusha, Nigeria,south africa,south korea ,noth korea,Ww jamaa siku hizi umekuwa chenga kabisa sijui umekuwaje?
Samahani kwa kutumia maneno makali ila nimelazimika maana unaongea pumba tu.
Hivi hichi anacho kipitia Urusi nchini Ukraine si hata huyo huyo Marekani unaye muona kama mungu alisha kipitia nchini Vietnam na afghanistan?
Si hata Usoviet alisha kipitia nchini Afghanistan?
Sasa hapo cha kushagaza ni kipi?
Hivi hizo silaha unazo zidharau si ndo zilimkimbiza Marekani nchini Vietnam na Afghanistan?
Si ndo zimefanya mpaka sasa Asad yuko madarakani baada ya kuwashinda waasi walio kuwa wakitumia silaha za kimagharibi unazo zisifia hapa?
Hizo silaha za kimagharibi si ndo zimeshindwa vita nchini Yemen dhidi ya silaha za kiiran ambayo bado ni nchi changa kiteknolojia?
Si ndo zimesababisha zaidi ya mataifa 30 tena yanayo jiita yana nguvu yajiunge ili kukabiliana na silaha hizo?
Hivi mfano Marekani aingie vitani na Iran alafu Iran awe anapewa silaha za mabilioni ya $ kama anazo zipokea Ukraine sasa hivi unategemea Marekani hata apigane miaka 100 anaweza kuishinda hiyo vita?
Kingine Urusi sio kwamba haiwezi kutengeneza hivyo vitu bali sema haijaamua kuwekeza huko kutokana inapata mabilioni ya dora kila mwaka kutokana rasilimali alizonazo kwa hiyo haoni umuhimu wa kufanya hivyo.
Na ndio maana ukijaribu kuangalia nchi zisizo kuwa na rasilimali ndio zimewekeza pakubwa sana kwenye viwanda kwa ajili ya kuendesha mataifa yao.
Hivi Urusi yenye uwezo wa kutengeneza satalait zinazo izunguka dunia ije ishindwe kutengeneza noha, blender,pas,sijui meza na takataka zingine hivi mwenye mawazo kama haya utamuita mtu mwenye akili?
Yaani mkuu wa Nato ahiofie Urusi alafu ww mhitimu wa chuo unaye subiri huruma ya samia ili upate ajira ya ualimu useme Urusi hamna kitu ,kweli wabongo tuna matatizo.
Sasa afganistan unalinganisha na ukraine mkuu , vita viwili tofati kabisa ,nasema hivi kwa sababu vita ya Russia na Ukraine ni kubwa kuliko ya US kule afganistan,nikimaanisha Russia ametumia nguvu nyingi ukraine mpaka anafikia hatua ya mobilazation na kutishia kutumia nuke .Hilo US hakufanya afganistanNdipo akili zenu ziliposhia!Hao Afghan walikuwa na silaha gani za maana?Walipewa msaada na mataifa mangapi ya silaha,intelegensia na mafunzo?
Pamoja na kukosa yote hayo,US kaondoka Kwa aibu!
[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23] mbona leo hujaambatanisha na picha?iran imefanikiwa kupata technology ya makombora ya hypasonic kabla ya marekani marekani kila ikijaribu yanaishia kufeli [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23] leta link ya source ya hii habari tafadhari,huwezi kutudanganya tena kama ulivyozoeaLeo tena wanajeshi wa Ukraine walikuwa wanavuka MTO dnopro kuja upande wa pili wa jiji LA Kherson mashua zao zote zilizamisha urusi ilitumia akili kubwa kusepa upande mmoja wa jiji LA Kherson
Au niamini mimi broSource: Haki ya Mungu sidanganyi
Punyeto inaharibu mishipa ya fahamu mkuu 😅😅Ww jamaa siku hizi umekuwa chenga kabisa sijui umekuwaje?
Samahani kwa kutumia maneno makali ila nimelazimika maana unaongea pumba tu.
Hivi hichi anacho kipitia Urusi nchini Ukraine si hata huyo huyo Marekani unaye muona kama mungu alisha kipitia nchini Vietnam na afghanistan?
Si hata Usoviet alisha kipitia nchini Afghanistan?
Sasa hapo cha kushagaza ni kipi?
Hivi hizo silaha unazo zidharau si ndo zilimkimbiza Marekani nchini Vietnam na Afghanistan?
Si ndo zimefanya mpaka sasa Asad yuko madarakani baada ya kuwashinda waasi walio kuwa wakitumia silaha za kimagharibi unazo zisifia hapa?
Hizo silaha za kimagharibi si ndo zimeshindwa vita nchini Yemen dhidi ya silaha za kiiran ambayo bado ni nchi changa kiteknolojia?
Si ndo zimesababisha zaidi ya mataifa 30 tena yanayo jiita yana nguvu yajiunge ili kukabiliana na silaha hizo?
Hivi mfano Marekani aingie vitani na Iran alafu Iran awe anapewa silaha za mabilioni ya $ kama anazo zipokea Ukraine sasa hivi unategemea Marekani hata apigane miaka 100 anaweza kuishinda hiyo vita?
Kingine Urusi sio kwamba haiwezi kutengeneza hivyo vitu bali sema haijaamua kuwekeza huko kutokana inapata mabilioni ya dora kila mwaka kutokana rasilimali alizonazo kwa hiyo haoni umuhimu wa kufanya hivyo.
Na ndio maana ukijaribu kuangalia nchi zisizo kuwa na rasilimali ndio zimewekeza pakubwa sana kwenye viwanda kwa ajili ya kuendesha mataifa yao.
Hivi Urusi yenye uwezo wa kutengeneza satalait zinazo izunguka dunia ije ishindwe kutengeneza noha, blender,pas,sijui meza na takataka zingine hivi mwenye mawazo kama haya utamuita mtu mwenye akili?
Yaani mkuu wa Nato ahiofie Urusi alafu ww mhitimu wa chuo unaye subiri huruma ya samia ili upate ajira ya ualimu useme Urusi hamna kitu ,kweli wabongo tuna matatizo.
Sasa marekani kaleta Himars ya mwaka 90 inamuhenyesha Mrusi hizo Hypersonic mrusi zimemsaidia nini hapo Ukraine toka Himars imeingia mrusi haja advance hata mita moja[emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787]iran imefanikiwa kupata technology ya makombora ya hypasonic kabla ya marekani marekani kila ikijaribu yanaishia kufeli [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
King Comedian Zale jana alikuwa hapo Kherson Russia hajarusha hata jiwe mnaishia kusema trap[emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji635][emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787]View attachment 2416878
[https://whdh]
Russian Emergency Situations Ministry workers disassemble a destroyed building in Mariupol, in territory under the government of the Donetsk People's Republic, eastern Ukraine, Friday, May 27, 2022. (AP Photo/Alexei Alexandrov)
KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — Russia said it began withdrawing troops from a strategic Ukrainian city Thursday, creating a potential turning point in the grinding war, while a Ukrainian official warned that Russian land mines could render Kherson a “city of death.”
Ukrainian officials acknowledged Moscow’s forces had no choice but to flee Kherson, yet they remained cautious, fearing an ambush. With Ukrainian officials tight-lipped with their assessments, reporters not present and spotty communications, it was difficult to know what was happening in the port city, where the residents who remained after tens of thousands fled were afraid to leave their homes.
A forced pullout from Kherson — the only provincial capital Moscow captured after invading Ukraine in February — would mark one of Russia’s worst war setbacks. Recapturing the city, whose pre-war population was 280,000, could provide Ukraine a launching pad for supplies and troops to try to win back other lost territory in the south, including Crimea, which Moscow seized in 2014.
Ukrainian forces seem to be scoring more battlefield successes elsewhere in the Kherson region and closing in on the city. President Volodymyr Zelenskky said Thursday night the pace has increased so much that residents “are now checking almost every hour where our units have reached and where else our national flag was raised.”
The armed forces commander-in-chief, Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, said Kyiv’s forces have advanced 36.5 kilometers (22.7 miles) and retaken 41 villages and towns since Oct. 1 in the province, which the Kremlin has illegally annexed. That included 12 settlements on Wednesday alone.
Ukrainian presidential adviser Mykhailo Podolyak said Russian troops laid mines throughout Kherson as they withdrew to turn it into a “city of death” and predicted they would shell it after relocating across the Dnieper River.
From these new positions, the Kremlin could try to escalate the 8 1/2-month war, which U.S. assessments showed may already have killed or wounded tens of thousands of civilians and hundreds of thousands of soldiers.
Arkadiy Dovzhenko, who fled Kherson in June, said his grandparents still living there told him Thursday that “the Russians were bringing a lot of equipment into the town and also mining every inch of it.”
Zelenskyy said Thursday night his forces were racing to remove land mines from 170,000 square meters (65,637 square miles) nationwide, and planned also to do so in Kherson. A spokeswoman for Ukraine’s southern military, Natalia Humeniuk, said on Ukrainian television that resistance forces working behind enemy lines “carefully collect information” about critical infrastructure threatened by mines.
Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu ordered a troop withdrawal from Kherson and nearby areas on Wednesday after his top general in Ukraine reported that a loss of supply routes during Ukraine’s southern counteroffensive made a defense “futile.”
Shoigu’s ministry reported Thursday a “maneuver of units of the Russian group” to the Dnieper River’s eastern bank, also known as its left bank.
On Thursday, Ukrainian officials appeared to soften the skepticism they had expressed over whether the Russians were really on the run or trying to trap Ukraine’s soldiers. “The enemy had no other choice but to resort to fleeing,” armed forces chief Zaluzhny said, because Kyiv’s army destroyed supply systems and disrupted Russia’s local military command.
Still, he said the Ukrainian military could not confirm a Russian withdrawal.
Alexander Khara, of the Kyiv-based think tank Center for Defense Strategies, echoed those concerns, saying he remained fearful that Russian forces could destroy a dam upriver from Kherson and flood the city’s approaches. The former Ukrainian diplomat also warned of booby traps and other possible dangers.
“I would be surprised if the Russians had not set up something, some surprises for Ukraine,” Khara said.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, who just over a month ago celebrated the annexation of Kherson and three other Ukrainian regions and vowed to defend them by any means, has not commented on the withdrawal.
A resident said Kherson was deserted Thursday and that explosions could be heard from around Antonivskiy Bridge — a key Dnieper River crossing that Ukrainian forces have repeatedly bombarded.
“Life in the city seems to have stopped. Everyone has disappeared somewhere and no one knows what will happen next,” said Konstantin, a resident whose last name was withheld for security reasons.
He said Russian flags have disappeared from the city’s administrative buildings, and no signs remain of the Russian military personnel who earlier moved into the apartments of evacuated residents. Russian state news agency Tass reported that emergency services such as police officers and medical workers would leave along with the last Russian troops.
Halyna Lugova, head of the Ukrainian administration of Kherson city, told Ukrainian television Thursday that the Russian military was moving vehicles towards the Antonivskiy Bridge. Lugova, who is now based in Ukrainian-controlled territory, described conditions in the city as brutal.
Kherson remains without power, heating and internet service, gas stations in the city are closed, and there is no fuel, she said. The city also has run out of medications for cancer and diabetes patients. Ukrainian news reports said the Russians blew up the local television center, some of the cellphone towers and energy infrastructure.
Ukrainian officials have been cautious at other times in declaring victories against a Russian force that at least initially outgunned and outnumbered Ukraine’s armed forces.
Orysia Lutsevych, head of the Ukraine Forum at international affairs think-tank Chatham House, said the reticence explains “why, until Ukrainians are in the city, they don’t want to declare that they have it (in) control.”
British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was similarly cautious. He spoke to Zelenskyy on Thursday, and his office said they agreed “it was right to continue to exercise caution until the Ukrainian flag was raised over the city.”
Army Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Wednesday he believed a retreat was underway, but that Russia had amassed as many as 30,000 troops in Kherson and that a full withdrawal could take several weeks.
One analyst noted that the Ukrainian army has destroyed bridges and roads as part of its counteroffensive, making a quick transfer of Russian troops across the Dnieper River impossible.
“The main question is whether the Ukrainians will give the Russians the opportunity to calmly withdraw, or fire at them during the crossing to the left bank,” Ukrainian military analyst Oleh Zhdanov said. “The personnel can be taken out on boats, but the equipment needs to be taken out only on barges and pontoons, and this is very easily shelled by the Ukrainian army.”
Putin’s allies rushed to defend the retreat as tough, but necessary. However, Pro-Kremlin political analyst Sergei Markov broke ranks and described the move as “Russia’s biggest geopolitical loss since the collapse of the Soviet Union” and warned that “political consequences of this huge loss will be really big.”
___
Karmanau reported from Tallinn, Estonia. Raf Casert contributed from Brussels. Jill Lawless contributed from London. Andrew Katell contributed from New York.
(Copyright (c) 2022 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.)
Sijui kama kuna anayeamini porojo zako sasa hivi hamna habari yoyote ni kutunga tu kuonesha mnapambana lakini hakuna kitu wanajeshi wenu wengi wamevua gwanda na kujichangaya na raia baada ya kusikia azov wameingia Kherson kusafisha mji[emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787]Leo tena wanajeshi wa Ukraine walikuwa wanavuka MTO dnopro kuja upande wa pili wa jiji LA Kherson mashua zao zote zilizamisha urusi ilitumia akili kubwa kusepa upande mmoja wa jiji LA Kherson
Hiyo Himars imemmaliza nani?Kwahiyo Ukraine kashinda vita?Nasema kama huyo Afgan au Iraq wangepata msaada wa silaha Bora,mafunzo na Intelegensia kutoka 30+ nations kama anavyopata Ukraine basi hali ingekuwa tofauti!Sasa afganistan unalinganisha na ukraine mkuu , vita viwili tofati kabisa ,nasema hivi kwa sababu vita ya Russia na Ukraine ni kubwa kuliko ya US kule afganistan,nikimaanisha Russia ametumia nguvu nyingi ukraine mpaka anafikia hatua ya mobilazation na kutishia kutumia nuke .Hilo US hakufanya afganistan
Pili kumbuka US aliikalia afganistan zaid ya miaka 10.Putin miji aliyoichukua sidhani hata mwaka atamaliza itarudishwa.
Alafu ukae ukijua chata ya US ni tai ,tai uliyemwona kanyonyoka manyoya enzi ya vietnam siyo wa leo.
Silaha moja tuu Himas imetosha kuwavuruga .
Na hiyo ni ndogo sana .
Siku hizi Hadi jukwaa hili limeingia mipasho!Ni kama mwaka 2007 ,mandonga alipoona USA kapiga watelebani kwa bomu kubwa kabisa lijulikanalo kwa jina la Mother of all bombs (MOAB).Naye akasema ametengeneza father of all bombs .CIA wakasema ni fake , Putin akalionesha kwenye gwaride ila hakuwah kutest.Sasa leo kama angekua nalo si angepiga huko ukraine maana hakuna kombora ambalo mandonga hajatumia Ukraine .Ndio maana wanamhofia atageukia nuke ,hii midicteta huwa ina mikwara sana.Nakumbuka nikiwa shule ya msingi tuliaminishwa sadamu anaweza kuangamiza dunia nzima kwa silaha zake za kibaiology.kumbe mikwara tuu.sasa hivi story imehamia kwa mandonga kuwa nyuklia alizonazo anaweza kuangamiza dunia nzima.Ngoja tuone hii picha