Special Thread: Yanayojiri Mgogoro wa Ukraine na Urusi. Nini chanzo na hatma ya mzozo?

Special Thread: Yanayojiri Mgogoro wa Ukraine na Urusi. Nini chanzo na hatma ya mzozo?

Carlson kapigwa shule ya historia mpaka akapotea!! Akabaki kuuliza hiyo ilikuwa mwaka gani!!!
====
Carlson ni mwanahabari mahiri. Anakupa uhuru kujieleza mpaka utosheke...siyo kama akina Amonpour, Suker, na Wenzake...wanakuja kwenye mahojiano na agenda za secret agencies!!!
 
huyu mama anawashwa washwa
===========

Estonia will rewrite the constitution to deny voting rights to citizens of Russia and Belarus

Last summer, the Estonian Ministry of Justice prepared a bill to restrict the right of Estonian residents with Russian or Belarusian citizenship to vote in local elections, claiming that local authorities could not protect these people from the "negative" influence of Russia on their minds. At the same time, the Estonians realised that such a decision contradicted their constitution, so they decided to simply rewrite it.

The cunning Estonian government was looking for a way to limit the number of Russian and Belarusian citizens living on its territory, and found it - the Ministry of Justice reported that it had already prepared a version of the amended constitution and would soon submit it for consideration.

@ukraine_watch
View attachment 2874967
Estonia ni Sawa Na Bunju tu achaneni nayo hao hata Tanzania tunawapiga na Kikosi kimoja tu sio hata brigade....
 
Hakuna kitu kinachoitwa conspiracy theory Proved.Anayeweza ku-conspire against you ni mwenye power more than you.For most of us that is the NWO Cabal! I can't conspire against the NWO Cabal for example.So hii concept ya "Conspiracy Theory" imekuwa coined na wao NWO Cabal,ili kumdhalilisha mtu yeyote anayefichua siri zao.So let's be smart,tusikubali kutumiwa na adui zetu.Mimi namuona mtu yeyote anayetumia phrase hiyo kama minion na moron wa the NWO Cabal,either kwa kujua au kutojua.
 
Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky risks finding himself in the position of a disgraced leader after his “disgusting fight” with the former commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) Valeriy Zaluzhny “exposed the split in Ukraine.”

Bloomberg expressed this opinion on Friday. The agency draws attention to the fact that Zaluzhny was dismissed at the most inopportune moment, when aid from the United States was delayed, and the Ukrainian Armed Forces had a critical shortage of artillery shells.
 
wahuni wameupata wapi huu mzigo?
amazon?
elon musk wa buza atupe majibu

jeshi la RUSSIA wakiwa na starlink
1707579470448.png
 
Ukraine at risk of ‘cascading frontline collapse’ – NYT

Without US support, Kiev will soon struggle to repel Russian airstrikes and ground assaults, the report says
Ukraine at risk of ‘cascading frontline collapse’ – NYT

Ukraine’s worsening lack of ammunition and battle fatigue will most likely force Kiev to abandon its current frontline positions unless it receives new aid from the West, the New York Times reported on Friday.

The paper said that Ukrainian defenses near the key stronghold of Avdeevka in Russia’s Donetsk Region are reeling under relentless attacks, and Kiev’s problems extend beyond one single battle.

Ukrainian troops, the NYT added, are exhausted and suffer from a lack of weapons and ammunition, especially with regard to air defense systems. According to unnamed US officials interviewed by the outlet, Kiev only has enough air defense assets to last until March, unless it receives new shipments.
 
Requests for an interview with Vladimir Putin came from media outlets based in the United States, France, Italy, Austria and Australia. The Kremlin is grateful for such interest,"

Dmitry Peskov.



White House ‘hysterical’ over Putin interview – Moscow


Reaction to the interview among Washington’s elite has revealed the “mendacity of their approach,” Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova has said

The Biden administration and the US corporate media alike have whipped themselves up into an irrational frenzy over the interview that Russian President Vladimir Putin gave to conservative American journalist Tucker Carlson on Tuesday, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova has claimed. Earlier, Kremlin Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov said that professional jealousy had driven the hostile reaction from some of the reporter’s colleagues in the press.

The Former Fox News host became the first American media professional to interview the Russian head of state one-on-one since the Ukraine conflict flared up almost two years ago. The two-hour-long interview, which mostly centered on relations between Moscow and Kiev, garnered more than 46 million views on Carlson’s X account (formerly Twitter) and just under a million views on YouTube in the first hours since its release on Friday.

In a previous post on X earlier this week, Carlson accused Western media outlets of lying to “their readers and viewers” by promoting Kiev’s stance while ignoring Russia’s.

“That’s wrong. Americans have the right to know all they can about a war they are implicated in,” he said.


Speaking to Russia’s Izvestia newspaper on Friday, Zakharova said: “This is phenomenal. Their reaction reveals the mendacity of their approaches so much that, frankly speaking, you can’t believe it.”

According to the spokeswoman, “they’ve had a hysterical fit – the White House, the Department of State, all the mainstream media are shouting at the top of their lungs one thing only: don’t watch [President Putin’s interview], and that an American journalist shouldn’t conduct the interview.”

She added that such behavior takes the wind out of Washington’s sails in its attempts to present itself as a beacon of morality, human rights, democracy and freedom of speech.

During a press briefing on Friday, Kremlin spokesperson Peskov noted that the “high interest [in President Putin’s interview] is unquestionable.” He went on to predict that after the dust has settled, “there will be a deep analysis of this interview” in the West.

Speaking during a press briefing on Thursday ahead of the interview’s release, Coordinator for Strategic Communications at the National Security Council John Kirby urged his compatriots not to “take at face value anything [President Putin] has to say.”

Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton described the conservative reporter as a “useful idiot.” Other public figures have gone so far as to even call on the US government to bar Carlson from returning to the country.
 
[QUOTE="Proved, post:
New commander new strategies...
[/QUOTE]

Ukraine’s new commander-in-chief is an unpopular ‘butcher’ – Politico

Troops are wary of General Aleksandr Syrsky, and reportedly fear that he will throw them into “fruitless assaults”

Ukraine’s new armed forces chief, General Aleksandr Syrsky, is deeply unpopular among the rank and file of the Ukrainian military, who view him as a “butcher” willing to sacrifice waves of troops, Politico reported on Thursday.

Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky named Syrsky as the new head of the armed forces on Thursday, after firing General Valery Zaluzhny from the post. The switch had been the subject of media rumors for several weeks, and Zelensky hinted in an interview last week that it would form part of a wider “reset” of the country’s military and civilian leadership.

Syrsky is a controversial choice, best known for “leading forces into a meat grinder in Bakhmut [called Artyomovsk in Russia], sending wave after wave of troops to face opposition fire,” Politico said.

The unsuccessful defense of Artyomovsk/Bakhmut last year cost Ukraine dearly, and earned Syrsky the nickname ‘butcher’, an anonymous source within the Ukrainian military told the news site. A captain told the outlet that Syrsky’s appointment is a “very bad decision,” adding that soldiers refer to him as ‘General200’, a nickname that Politico said refers to 200 of his men dying, but could also refer to ‘Cargo 200’, a Soviet and Russian military code used to describe corpses being removed from the battlefield.
 
Russians express their appreciation for Tucker Carlson's bold move

Russians shower Tucker Carlson with love and support on social media
08.02.2024 18:07
Russians showered American journalist and former Fox News host Tucker Carlson with love and support on social media.

Russians shower Tucker Carlson with love and support on social media.
People left countless posts written in Russian to messages about his interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

"You are a real hero”, "He's handsome”, "Go, Tucker, go!”, "Our elephant”, "You are always welcome, Tucker”, "In Russia they love Carlson, unlike in the West", people wrote.

Many users from other countries also agreed with Russian posters. Many of them thanked the journalist for the interview and said that they could not wait to watch it.

Some suggested that Tucker Carlson's interview with Putin would be interview of the year in 2024. Someone wrote that the interview will be bigger than a new season of The Game of Thrones.

Tucker Carlson's unexpected appearance in the Russian capital generated many memes as well. Their authors joked about things that brought Carlson to Moscow, what career prospects he could find in Russia, and how Washington would react to his visit:

"Happy National Tucker Carlson Day!"
"Tucker just came to have a normal burger at Vkusno i Tochka" (former McDonald's restaurants — ed.).
Others joked that Carlson came to Russia to register with Gosuslugi (government services online platform — ed.), and then use the service to vote for Donald Trump in the US election.
 
Interview with Putin: Russian leader distorts Western picture of the world again

World media: Carlson’s interview with Putin 'shoots silver bullet overseas'
The long-awaited full interview with Tucker Carlson is getting millions of views and is expected to get a billion.


During the interview, Russian President Vladimir Putin gave a historical insight about the reasons for the emergence of Ukraine and its place in the world. He also explained the reasons for the special military operation, the reasons that led to the collapse of the USSR. He also talked about relations with Joe Biden, Volodymyr Zelensky, etc.

Many viewers were impressed with Putin's 30-minute history discourse. Comments like "Imagine Biden giving an uninterrupted history of America for 30 minutes" are getting tens of thousands of likes.

"Putin spent over 28 minutes going through 1,000 years of Eastern European history without a single note in his hand, Biden has no idea what he had for lunch. It's terrifying."

Interestingly, world media paid first priority attention to yesterday's news about Zelensky's decision to dismiss Zaluzhny and replace him with Alexander Syrsky. Of course, they did not say that Ukrainian soldiers call Syrsky "General the Butcher” and "Commander 200" (designation of the killed), nor do they that Syrsky is a native of the Russian Federation, with a Soviet-Russian military education, whose mother and relatives (in Russia) like posts in Putin's support.

American journalists, in particular, said that the importance of the interview was overestimated. They also stressed that millions of people would thus know Russia's position, whereas the Russian president demonstrated "tactical confidence in his abilities” while his opponents were experiencing a "dangerous moment.”

The New York Times said that the Russian president called on the United States to negotiate on Ukraine.

"In a two-hour interview, President Vladimir Putin of Russia was more direct than usual about how he sees his Ukraine invasion ending: not with a military victory, but a deal with the West," The NYT said.

The interview also demonstrated the following:

Ukraine is experiencing difficulties on the battlefield,
further military assistance to Kyiv has stalled,
the number of Russia-friendly politicians in the world is increasing on both sides of the Atlantic.
"Tucker Carlson's interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin went exactly how everyone expected, as not so much of an interview, but a demonstration by Putin of the ease with which he could utterly overpower one of the United States' most prominent media figures,” Rolling Stone wrote.

The Guardian sang its own story. British journalists assumed that the interview marked a new level of infamy for Carlson, who often criticised US support for Ukraine and called Ukrainian President Zelensky a "Ukrainian pimp” and a "rat-like oligarch.”

American journalist and musician Joey Mannarino admitted that the fact that Carlson made the interview happen and gave the world an opportunity to hear Putin's point of view was very positive.

The BBC strongly disagreed with what ordinary Americans thought of the interview. From the point of view of the BBC, Putin talked a lot about the beginning of the "invasion,” while claiming that Russia did not attack Ukraine. According to Putin, Moscow was simply reacting to national security threats.

British journalists also wondered why Carlson did not ask Putin about most important (for whom?) — fictitious war crimes in Bucha, the evacuation of Ukrainian children to Russia (where they could feel safe and rest in Artek resort), the arrest warrant from ICC, the jailed extremist blogger and so on and so forth.

CBS News said that the interview was a silver bullet that was shot overseas into the heart of the old world order.

Business Insider noted that while Tucker Carlson was promoting his interview with Putin, the US support for Ukraine reached a new low.

Mirror US quoted Keir Giles, author and researcher studying Russia, who could not find a better thing to say other than:

"Tucker Carlson's interview with Putin is good news for everybody involved. The only problem is, everybody involved is an enemy of the United States, of the West, of democracy and of genuine journalism."

The Wall Street Journal is upset that Carlson's interview provided Putin with an opportunity to speak to Americans directly in prime time the day when negotiations on additional aid to Ukraine began in the US Senate.

The Daily Mail pointed out a very important aspect in the interview. Putin made a sensational statement for the West that a peace agreement on Ukraine was once almost reached, but the United States and its allies wanted to continue the conflict for as long as possible.

Al Jazeera noted that Putin did not conceal the fact that his government was in contact with the United States, whereas a peaceful resolution to the war would only be possible if Washington agreed to stop arms supplies to Ukraine.

Many American media did not appreciate the historical insight that Putin gave in the interview. They called it deceptive (like CNN did) because it differs from the Western picture of the world, in which, for example, it was the USA that defeated Hitler and the USSR "only helped the Americans defeat Nazism"…
 
Back
Top Bottom