Stephen Hawking's Final Book Says There's 'No Possibility' of God in Our Universe

Stephen Hawking's Final Book Says There's 'No Possibility' of God in Our Universe

Stephen Hawking's Final Book Says There's 'No Possibility' of God in Our Universe
By Brandon Specktor, Senior Writer | October 17, 2018 04:23pm ET

Stephen Hawking's Final Book Says There's 'No Possibility' of God in Our Universe

In a new book that was published posthumously, Stephen Hawking, who died in March, wrote that it is impossible for God to exist in our universe.


From his desk at Cambridge University and beyond, Stephen Hawking sent his mind spiraling into the deepest depths of black holes, radiating across the endless cosmos and swirling back billions of years to witness time's first breath. He viewed creation as a scientist, and when he was called to discuss creation's biggest puzzles — Where do we come from? What is our purpose? Are we alone? — he answered as a scientist, often to the chagrin of religious critics.

In Stephen Hawking's final book "Brief Answers to Big Questions," published Tuesday (Oct. 16) by Bantam Books, the professor begins a series of 10 intergalactic essays by addressing life's oldest and most religiously fraught question of all: Is there a God? [Big Bang to Civilization: 10 Amazing Origin Events]

Hawking's answer — compiled from decades of prior interviews, essays and speeches with the help of his family, colleagues and the Steven Hawking Estate — should come as no surprise to readers who have followed his work, er, religiously.

  • aHR0cDovL3d3dy5saXZlc2NpZW5jZS5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL2kvMDAwLzEwMi8yMTYvb3JpZ2luYWwvc3RlcGhlbi1oYXdraW5nLU9ORS1USU1FLVVTRS5qcGc=
Credit: Frederick M. Brown/Getty Images


"I think the universe was spontaneously created out of nothing, according to the laws of science," Hawking, who died in March, wrote. "If you accept, as I do, that the laws of nature are fixed, then it doesn't take long to ask: What role is there for God?"
In life, Hawking was a vocal champion of the Big Bang theory — the idea that the universe began by exploding suddenly out of an ultradense singularity smaller than an atom. From this speck emerged all the matter, energy and empty space that the universe would ever contain, and all that raw material evolved into the cosmos we perceive today by following a strict set of scientific laws. To Hawking and many like-minded scientists, the combined laws of gravity, relativity, quantum physics and a few other rules could explain everything that ever happened or ever will happen in our known universe.
"If you like, you can say the laws are the work of God, but that is more a definition of God than a proof of his existence," Hawking wrote.

With the universe running on a scientifically guided autopilot, the only role for an all-powerful deity might be setting the initial conditions of the universe so that those laws could take shape — a divine creator who caused the Big Bang to bang, then stepped back to behold His work.

"Did God create the quantum laws that allowed the Big Bang to occur?" Hawking wrote. "I have no desire to offend anyone of faith, but I think science has a more compelling explanation than a divine creator."
Hawking's explanation begins with quantum mechanics, which explains how subatomic particles behave. In quantum studies, it's common to see subatomic particles like protons and electrons seemingly appear out of nowhere, stick around for a while and then disappear again to a completely different location. Because the universe was once the size of a subatomic particle itself, it's plausible that it behaved similarly during the Big Bang, Hawking wrote.
"The universe itself, in all its mind-boggling vastness and complexity, could simply have popped into existence without violating the known laws of nature," he wrote.

That still doesn't explain away the possibility that God created that proton-size singularity, then flipped the quantum- mechanical switch that allowed it to pop. But Hawking says science has an explanation here, too. To illustrate, he points to the physics of black holes — collapsed stars that are so dense, nothing, including light, can escape their pull.
Black holes, like the universe before the Big Bang, condense into a singularity. In this ultra-packed point of mass, gravity is so strong that it distorts time as well as light and space. Simply put, in the depths of a black hole, time does not exist.

Because the universe also began as a singularity, time itself could not have existed before the Big Bang. Hawking's answer, then, to what happened before the Big Bang is, "there was no time before the Big Bang."

"We have finally found something that doesn’t have a cause, because there was no time for a cause to exist in," Hawking wrote. "For me this means that there is no possibility of a creator, because there is no time for a creator to have existed in."

This argument will do little to persuade theistic believers, but that was never Hawking's intent. As a scientist with a near-religious devotion to understanding the cosmos, Hawking sought to "know the mind of God" by learning everything he could about the self-sufficient universe around us. While his view of the universe might render a divine creator and the laws of nature incompatible, it still leaves ample space for faith, hope, wonder and, especially, gratitude.

"We have this one life to appreciate the grand design of the universe," Hawking concludes the first chapter of his final book, "and for that I am extremely grateful."
Originally published on Live Science.

cc James Comey
Natumaini alikufa kifo chema.
Mungu awepo asiwepo bado watu wanahitaji kusali na kuabudu ili wawe na afya ya akili na mwili.

Tafiti zinaonyesha watu wanaoamini uwepo wa mungu wa afya njema zaidi kuliko wapagani
 
Kwanza kabla ya kuendelea nithibitishie kuwa anashindwa kuzuia mabaya?maana umetumia kauli kuwa Anashindwa kuzuia.

Mungu mnamsema mjuzi wa yote, mwenye uwezo wote na upendo wote.

Ameumba ulimwengu ambao unaruhusu mabaya.

Kwa nini?

Kama hajashindwa kuumba ulimwengu ambao hauruhusu mabaya (na hivyo kuzuia mabaya kuwepo), kwa nini kaumba ulimwengu unaoruhusu mabaya kuwepo?

Kataka tu?

Kama hajashindwa kuzuia mabaya, kataka tu mabaya yawepo, mtasemaje ana upendo wote? Mungu mwenye uwezo wa kuumba ulimwengu ambao mabaya hayawezekani kuwepo, halafu asiumbe ulimwengu huo, akaumba huu wenye kuweza kuwa na mabaya, utasemaje ana upendo wote?

Kwa nini hakuumba ulimwengu ambao mabaya hayawezi kuwepo?
 
Natumaini alikufa kifo chema.
Mungu awepo asiwepo bado watu wanahitaji kusali na kuabudu ili wawe na afya ya akili na mwili.

Tafiti zinaonyesha watu wanaoamini uwepo wa mungu wa afya njema zaidi kuliko wapagani
Unaelewa kwamba hata Wapagani wanaamini Mungu, na kutoamini Mungu ni tofauti na upagani?
 
Unaelewa kwamba hata Wapagani wanaamini Mungu, na kutoamini Mungu ni tofauti na upagani?
Dah mkuu mimi nina hofu ya Mungu.Na nikienda kwa ibada napata amani na matumaini yanayotokana na hofu zangu za maisha.Katika maisha haya ni bora uwe mkristu, muislamu na hata budha kuliko kuwa mpagani.

Iwapo wewe unapata amani kwa kumsoma marehemu Hawkings ambaye alikuwa ni mpagani basi ni vizuri pia.
 
Dah mkuu mimi nina hofu ya Mungu.Na nikienda kwa ibada napata amani na matumaini yanayotokana na hofu zangu za maisha.Katika maisha haya ni bora uwe mkristu, muislamu na hata budha kuliko kuwa mpagani.

Iwapo wewe unapata amani kwa kumsoma marehemu Hawkings ambaye alikuwa ni mpagani basi ni vizuri pia.
Hujajibu nililokuuliza na ulilojibu sijakuuliza.
 
Sina nia ya malumbano mkuu.Naheshimu maamuzi yako ya kuwa mpagani.
Wewe ngumbaru hata maana ya neno mpagani hujui, halafu ukipewa darasa la bure hufundishiki.

Mpagani bibi yako.
 
Mungu mnamsema mjuzi wa yote, mwenye uwezo wote na upendo wote.

Ameumba ulimwengu ambao unaruhusu mabaya.

Kwa nini?

Kama hajashindwa kuumba ulimwengu ambao hauruhusu mabaya (na hivyo kuzuia mabaya kuwepo), kwa nini kaumba ulimwengu unaoruhusu mabaya kuwepo?

Kataka tu?

Kama hajashindwa kuzuia mabaya, kataka tu mabaya yawepo, mtasemaje ana upendo wote? Mungu mwenye uwezo wa kuumba ulimwengu ambao mabaya hayawezekani kuwepo, halafu asiumbe ulimwengu huo, akaumba huu wenye kuweza kuwa na mabaya, utasemaje ana upendo wote?

Kwa nini hakuumba ulimwengu ambao mabaya hayawezi kuwepo?
Mbona haueleweki? Unazungumzia Ulimwengu kuruhusu mabaya au Mungu kuruhusu mabaya yatokee? Hoja yako hasa ipi kuhusu mabaya tatizo ni ulimwengu au Mungu?
 
Mbona haueleweki? Unazungumzia Ulimwengu kuruhusu mabaya au Mungu kuruhusu mabaya yatokee? Hoja yako hasa ipi kuhusu mabaya tatizo ni ulimwengu au Mungu?
Ulimwengu umekuwepo bila Mungu kuuruhusu uwepo?
 
Ulimwengu umekuwepo bila Mungu kuuruhusu uwepo?
Haujajibu nilichouliza,hoja yako ni ulimwengu kuruhusu mabaya au Mungu kuruhusu mabaya kutokea ulimwenguni.

Halafu ukiniuliza kwamba ulimwengu unaweza kuwepo bila Mungu kuruhusu? Maana yake Mungu sio muumbaji au muundaji wa huo ulimwengu.
 
Tatizo watu mnabishana Mungu yupo mara hayupo lakini nadhani ilitakiwa kujua kwanza Mungu ni nini? Au Mungu ni nani? I'm sure kwenye maana ya Mungu ndo kuna contractions otherwise tungejua Mungu ni nini then Je, Mungu ndo chanzo cha yote au pengine tunaamini/tumetengeneza Mungu wetu mwingine ambaye siye cha vyote.
 
Haujajibu nilichouliza,hoja yako ni ulimwengu kuruhusu mabaya au Mungu kuruhusu mabaya kutokea ulimwenguni.

Halafu ukiniuliza kwamba ulimwengu unaweza kuwepo bila Mungu kuruhusu? Maana yake Mungu sio muumbaji au muundaji wa huo ulimwengu.
Mungu kauumba/ kauruhusu ulimwengu kuwapo? Au ulimwengu umetokea bila kuumbwa wala kuruhusiwa kuwepo na Mungu?
 
Tatizo watu mnabishana Mungu yupo mara hayupo lakini nadhani ilitakiwa kujua kwanza Mungu ni nini? Au Mungu ni nani? I'm sure kwenye maana ya Mungu ndo kuna contractions otherwise tungejua Mungu ni nini then Je, Mungu ndo chanzo cha yote au pengine tunaamini/tumetengeneza Mungu wetu mwingine ambaye siye cha vyote.
Karibu kila nikijibu habari za Mungu naeleza kwamba ninaongelea Mungu "Mjuzi wa yote, mwenye uwezo wote na upendo wote".

Imekuwa kama mantra sasa.

Hujaona?

Ukiongelea Mungu tu bila definition, hata Beyonce kuna watu wanamuita Mungu.

Na Beyonce yupo, kwa hivyo katika ubishi wa Mungu Beyonce yupo au hayupo, kwa definition ya Mungu ambayoinamfanya Beyonce kuwa Mungu, siwezi kubisha.

Halafu tatizo si definition tu, kama hapa nime define mara kibao, lakini ama hujasoma, ama umesoma hujaelewa.

Kuna watu washakula kiapo, wao Mungu awepo,asiwepo, wanabisha kwa kusema yupo tu.

Sasa hao utasemaje tatizo ni definition?
 
Unajua kusoma habari kwa ufahamu na kuchambu sentensi kimantiki?
Neno asilani umelitoa wapi? Maana hakuna nilipotumia hilo neno wala hakuna nilichosema chenye kumaanisha hilo neno.

Hakuna niliposema kuwa wewe umesema kuwa hutozungumzia imani.
 
Karibu kila nikijibu habari za Mungu naeleza kwamba ninaongelea Mungu "Mjuzi wa yote, mwenye uwezo wote na upendo wote".

Imekuwa kama mantra sasa.

Hujaona?
Umeulizwa Mungu ni nini unaeleza sifa za huyo Mungu badala ya kuelezea Mungu ni nini?

Ukiulizwa paka ni nini utaanza kutaja rangi ya paka na manyoa yake.
 
Neno asilani umelitoa wapi? Maana hakuna nilipotumia hilo neno wala hakuna nilichosema chenye kumaanisha hilo neno.

Hakuna niliposema kuwa wewe umesema kuwa hutozungumzia imani.
Kama sijasema sitaki kujadili imani asilani, utaanzaje kushangaa nikijadili imani popote?
 
Back
Top Bottom