Mungu wako yuko limited?Mungu wetu ana upendo lakini uko limited. Fikiria mtu kama Stephen Hawking ambaye mpaka umauti unamfika hajatubia.
Hivyo jeuri yako hiyo nikuwa anakusubirisha! Anakupa nafasi ya kurejea.
Hiyo agenda ya terrorism ya kisiasa unaijua wewe. haina uhusiano na dini. Kama una dalili kwenye maandiko yalete.
Uislam unajivunia kuwa ndiyo "The fastest growing religion so far" And soon will overcome Christianity! Ukitaka data zipo za kutosha.
USICHEZE NA MUNGU NDIO MAANA KAPIGWA GONJWA LA AJABU HUYU JAMA UKIMUANGALIA SANA ALIKUWA ANAONEKANA KAMA MAITI
View attachment 942661
Mungu wetu ana upendo lakini uko limited. Fikiria mtu kama Stephen Hawking ambaye mpaka umauti unamfika hajatubia.
Hivyo jeuri yako hiyo nikuwa anakusubirisha! Anakupa nafasi ya kurejea.
Hiyo agenda ya terrorism ya kisiasa unaijua wewe. haina uhusiano na dini. Kama una dalili kwenye maandiko yalete.
Uislam unajivunia kuwa ndiyo "The fastest growing religion so far" And soon will overcome Christianity! Ukitaka data zipo za kutosha.
Complex numbers ni physical?According to Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English: Oxford University Press, p. 869, "Physical adj. 2. of or concerning things that can be experienced through the five senses, eg touch, or sight, rather than perceived through the mind or spirit: the physical world/universe."
Hapo juu, concern yangu ilikuwa kuonyesha kuwa science is limited to the observable universe and relies on empirical evidence - that's 'information received by means of the senses, particularly by observation and documentation of patterns and behaviour through experimentation'. According to the he online Dictionary.com, 'physical' (adjective):
2. of or relating to that which is material: the physical universe, the physical sciences.
3. noting or pertaining to the properties of matter and energy other than those peculiar to living matter.
Hivyo basi, science is limited to the physical world/the material/what can be observed or experimented as opposed to the spiritual/immaterial.
Kusema 'science deals with the physical world' ningeweza kusema pia kwamba science is limited to the physical/material world - what can be observed and experimented as opposed to the spiritual/immaterial world. Lakini discussion iliyoanza siyo hii ni wewe 1) ku'define' evil 2) kuonyesha how volcanic eruption, earthquake, tsunami is evil 3) how evil is incompatible with God's existence. Bado hujaonyesha kitu hapa.
His human being natumaini now atakwenda kuhakikisha.Stephen Hawking's Final Book Says There's 'No Possibility' of God in Our Universe
By Brandon Specktor, Senior Writer | October 17, 2018 04:23pm ET
Stephen Hawking's Final Book Says There's 'No Possibility' of God in Our Universe
In a new book that was published posthumously, Stephen Hawking, who died in March, wrote that it is impossible for God to exist in our universe.
From his desk at Cambridge University and beyond, Stephen Hawking sent his mind spiraling into the deepest depths of black holes, radiating across the endless cosmos and swirling back billions of years to witness time's first breath. He viewed creation as a scientist, and when he was called to discuss creation's biggest puzzles — Where do we come from? What is our purpose? Are we alone? — he answered as a scientist, often to the chagrin of religious critics.
In Stephen Hawking's final book "Brief Answers to Big Questions," published Tuesday (Oct. 16) by Bantam Books, the professor begins a series of 10 intergalactic essays by addressing life's oldest and most religiously fraught question of all: Is there a God? [Big Bang to Civilization: 10 Amazing Origin Events]
Hawking's answer — compiled from decades of prior interviews, essays and speeches with the help of his family, colleagues and the Steven Hawking Estate — should come as no surprise to readers who have followed his work, er, religiously.
Credit: Frederick M. Brown/Getty Images
"I think the universe was spontaneously created out of nothing, according to the laws of science," Hawking, who died in March, wrote. "If you accept, as I do, that the laws of nature are fixed, then it doesn't take long to ask: What role is there for God?"
In life, Hawking was a vocal champion of the Big Bang theory — the idea that the universe began by exploding suddenly out of an ultradense singularity smaller than an atom. From this speck emerged all the matter, energy and empty space that the universe would ever contain, and all that raw material evolved into the cosmos we perceive today by following a strict set of scientific laws. To Hawking and many like-minded scientists, the combined laws of gravity, relativity, quantum physics and a few other rules could explain everything that ever happened or ever will happen in our known universe.
"If you like, you can say the laws are the work of God, but that is more a definition of God than a proof of his existence," Hawking wrote.
With the universe running on a scientifically guided autopilot, the only role for an all-powerful deity might be setting the initial conditions of the universe so that those laws could take shape — a divine creator who caused the Big Bang to bang, then stepped back to behold His work.
"Did God create the quantum laws that allowed the Big Bang to occur?" Hawking wrote. "I have no desire to offend anyone of faith, but I think science has a more compelling explanation than a divine creator."
Hawking's explanation begins with quantum mechanics, which explains how subatomic particles behave. In quantum studies, it's common to see subatomic particles like protons and electrons seemingly appear out of nowhere, stick around for a while and then disappear again to a completely different location. Because the universe was once the size of a subatomic particle itself, it's plausible that it behaved similarly during the Big Bang, Hawking wrote.
"The universe itself, in all its mind-boggling vastness and complexity, could simply have popped into existence without violating the known laws of nature," he wrote.
That still doesn't explain away the possibility that God created that proton-size singularity, then flipped the quantum- mechanical switch that allowed it to pop. But Hawking says science has an explanation here, too. To illustrate, he points to the physics of black holes — collapsed stars that are so dense, nothing, including light, can escape their pull.
Black holes, like the universe before the Big Bang, condense into a singularity. In this ultra-packed point of mass, gravity is so strong that it distorts time as well as light and space. Simply put, in the depths of a black hole, time does not exist.
Because the universe also began as a singularity, time itself could not have existed before the Big Bang. Hawking's answer, then, to what happened before the Big Bang is, "there was no time before the Big Bang."
"We have finally found something that doesn’t have a cause, because there was no time for a cause to exist in," Hawking wrote. "For me this means that there is no possibility of a creator, because there is no time for a creator to have existed in."
This argument will do little to persuade theistic believers, but that was never Hawking's intent. As a scientist with a near-religious devotion to understanding the cosmos, Hawking sought to "know the mind of God" by learning everything he could about the self-sufficient universe around us. While his view of the universe might render a divine creator and the laws of nature incompatible, it still leaves ample space for faith, hope, wonder and, especially, gratitude.
"We have this one life to appreciate the grand design of the universe," Hawking concludes the first chapter of his final book, "and for that I am extremely grateful."
Originally published on Live Science.
cc James Comey
belief is stronger than anything human can come across with, i sometimes think this puzzle can never be solved.
Science is a very powerful tool which gives answers to many puzzles, i respect science but i can't see it giving answers to this puzzle yet..
existence of a thing can be judged according to its characters but not necessary the characters can give true description of such a thing.. which in actual sense the proof one gives according to characters can not be final as truthy of such existence of a thing (for such characters are yet hypothesis and not theory).
belief is just a belief if its not your's then it does not matter!
Wewe hata kuelezea upendo ni nini imekushinda,we ni mtu wa kubabatiza mambo tu ambayo ukibanwa uyafafanue ndipo unapoonekana unajenga hoja kwa mambo ambayo hata wewe huyaelewi.Mungu wenu hana upendo wote, ndiyo maana mnalipua watu kwa terrorism.
Huyo si Mungu, ni ajenda ya kisiasa kutawala dunia, na imewashinda kuitimiza.
Du nadhani uwelewa ni shida.Mungu wako yuko limited?
Did you just write that?
Du nadhani uwelewa ni shida.
Kusema upendo wa Mungu uko limited haimaanishi Mungu yuko Limited. Mungu mwenyezi ana upendo kwa wanadamu. Ndiyo maana anawaruzuku waja bila kujali wanaomkubali au kumkataa. wanaomkataa bado anawapa muhula na alama za kuonyesha kuwa yupo na ili wamuelekee. Upendo huo Una Kikomo. Kama wakizidisha kumuasi basi huwa anawafyekelea mbali na kuleta kizazi kingine. Historia imeonyesha hivyo. Na au anawaaadhibu ili warejee. Lakini wakifa katika hali ya kukengeuka huwasubirisha ili baada ya ufufuo awaingize katika adhabu ya milele. Kwa vile kifo ni haki, ufufuo pia ni haki. Na Maisha baada ya kufufuliwa pia ni haki. Uchaguzi unao wewe.
Kauli nisiyoikubali ni kuwa: Mungu hana upendo wote. Huwezi kufa kafiri halafu akuingize peponi. Hilo amekataa.
The idea of an omnipotent, omniscient and all benevolent God is so easily contradicted by the problem of evil.it no suprise many of us inteligent people we have long concluded there is no God. woe to him who devote his lifetime to worship him
omnipotent ---let him make the biggest stone that he can not lift it, ooh then he not omnipotentThe idea of an omnipotent, omniscient and all benevolent God is so easily contradicted by the problem of evil.
It is funny to see the ignorance and cognitive dissonance spewed in defending a nonexistent God.
Matusi hayana nafasi kwenye hoja.Acha kuvutia bange kwenye makaratasi
Yani Mungu anayeshindana na viumbe wake mwenyewe na kuwafanyia hiyana kwa sababu hawamkubali atakuwa Mungu mjinga sana.
Ndiyo maana nasema hayupo, katungwa na watu tu.
Unajua kwamba ukifuatisha mantiki ya kwamba kila kilicho complex kina muumba wake, mantiki hiyo itakupeleka kwenye hitimisho la kwamba Mungu mjuzi wa yote, mwenye uwezo wote , upendo wote na muumba vyote hayupo?Yaani Gari linamuua aliyelitengeneza, akaliendesha yeye mwenyewe na Wala gari halina reasoning power lazima huyu mwanadamu atakuwa mjinga kupindukia. Inabidi tuseme mwanadamu hayupo! Ha ha haaaa