The Most Interesting and Weird Theories

The Most Interesting and Weird Theories

Alvin_255

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Posts
246
Reaction score
503
1.Great glaciation.
Great glaciation is the theory of the final state that our universe is heading toward. The universe has a limited supply of energy. According to this theory, when that energy finally runs out, the universe will devolve into a frozen state. Heat energy produced by the motion of the particles, heat loss, a natural law of the universe, means that eventually this particle motion will slow down and, presumably, one day everything will stop.

2. Solipsism.
Solipsism is a philosophical theory, which asserts that nothing exists but the individual’s consciousness. At first it seems silly – and who generally got it into his head completely deny the existence of the world around us? Except when you put your mind to it, it really is impossible to verify anything but your own consciousness. Don’t you believe me? Think a moment and think of all the possible dreams that you have experienced in your life. Is it not possible that everything around you is nothing but an incredibly intricate dream? But we have people and things around us that we cannot doubt, because we can hear, see, smell, taste and feel them, right? Yes, and no. People who take LSD, for example, say that they can touch the most convincing hallucinations, but we do not claim that their visions are “reality”. Your dreams simulate sensations as well, after all, what you perceive is what different sections of your brain tell you to. As a result, which parts of existence can we not doubt? None. Not the chicken we ate for dinner or the keyboard beneath our fingers. Each of us can only be sure in his own thoughts.

3. Idealist Philosophy
George Berkeley, the father of Idealism, argued that everything exists as an idea in someone’s mind. Berkley discovered that some of his comrades considered his theory stupid. The story goes that one of his detractors kicked a stone with his eyes closed and said, “There I’ve disproved it!” The idea being that if the stone really only exists in his imagination, he could not have kicked it with his eyes closed. Refutation of Berkeley is hard to understand, especially in these days. He argued that there is an omnipotent and omnipresent God, who sees all and all at once. Realistic, or not?

4. Plato and Logos.
Everybody has heard of Plato. He is the world’s most famous philosopher. Like all philosophers he had a few things to say about reality. He argued that beyond our perceived reality there lies a world of “perfect” forms. Everything that we see is just a shade, an imitation of how things truly are. He argued that by studying philosophy we have a chance of catching a glimpse of how things truly are, of discovering the perfect forms of everything we perceive. In addition to this stunning statement, Plato, being a monist, said that everything is made of a single substance. Which means (according to him) that diamonds, gold and dog feces all consist of the same basic material, but in a different form, which, with science’s discovery of atoms and molecules, has been proven true to an extent.

5. Presentism.
Time is something that we perceive as a matter of course, if we view it at the moment, we usually divide it into past, present and future. Presentism argues that the past and the future are imagined concepts, while only the present is real. In other words, today’s breakfast and every word of this article will cease to exist after you have read it, until you open it again. The future is just as imaginary, because time cannot exist before and after it happened, as claimed by St. Augustine.

6. Eternalism.
Enternalism is the exact opposite of presentism. This is a philosophical theory that says that time is multi-layered. It can be compared to a pound cake (however, unlike the time, a biscuit is not up for philosophical debate). All time exists simultaneously, but the measurement is determined by the observer. What he sees depends on which point he is looking at. Thus dinosaurs, World War II and Justin Bieber all exist simultaneously but can only be observed from a specific location. If one takes this view of reality then the future is hopeless and the deterministic free will is illusory.

7. The Brain in a Jar .
The “brain in a jar” thought experiment is a question discussed by thinkers and scientists, who, like most people, believe that human’s understanding of reality depends solely on his subjective feelings. So, what is the debate? Imagine that you are just a brain in a jar that is run by aliens or mad scientists. How would you know? And can you truly deny the possibility that this is your reality? This is a modern interpretation of the Cartesian evil demon problem. This thought experiment leads to the same conclusion: we cannot confirm the actual existence of anything except our consciousness. If this seems to sound reminiscent of the movie “The Matrix“, it is only because this idea was part of the very basis of the story. Unfortunately, in reality we have no red pills…

8.The multiverse theory.
Theory Anyone who has not spent the last ten years on a desert island, has at least once heard of “the multiverse”, or parallel universes. As many of us have seen, parallel words, in theory, are worlds very similar to ours, with little (or in some cases, large) changes or differences. The multiverse theory speculates that there could exist an infinite number of these alternate realities. What’s the point? In a parallel reality you have already killed the dinosaurs, and you are lying under the ground at a depth of eight feet (because that’s what happened there.) In the other you might be a powerful dictator. In another you might never have even been born since your parents never met. Now that’s a memorable image.

9. Fictional realism.
This is the most fascinating branch of multiverse theory. Superman is real. Yes, some of you would probably choose a different story, for argument’s sake, Harry Potter might be real too. This branch of the theory argues that given an infinite number of universes, everything must exist somewhere. So, all of our favorite fiction and fantasy may be descriptive of an alternate universe, one where all the right pieces came in to place to make it happen.

10. Phenomenalism.
Everyone is interested in what happens to things when we aren’t looking at them. Scientists have carefully studied this problem and some of them came to a simple conclusion - they disappear. Well, not quite like this. Phenomenalist philosophers believe that objects only exist as a phenomenon of consciousness. So, your laptop is only here while you are aware of, and believe in its existence, but when you turn away from it, it ceases to exist until you or someone else interacts with it. There is no existence without perception. This is the root of phenomenalism.
 
8.The multiverse theory.
Theory Anyone who has not spent the last ten years on a desert island, has at least once heard of “the multiverse”, or parallel universes. As many of us have seen, parallel words, in theory, are worlds very similar to ours, with little (or in some cases, large) changes or differences. The multiverse theory speculates that there could exist an infinite number of these alternate realities. What’s the point? In a parallel reality you have already killed the dinosaurs, and you are lying under the ground at a depth of eight feet (because that’s what happened there.) In the other you might be a powerful dictator. In another you might never have even been born since your parents never met. Now that’s a memorable image.
I realy like this theory for me this may be the most compelling theory
 
You forget about this one its interesting too

The holographic principle
is a theory that the universe is a three-dimensional image projected from a two-dimensional surface. It's a property of string theories and quantum gravity.
 
You forget about this one its interesting too

The holographic principle
is a theory that the universe is a three-dimensional image projected from a two-dimensional surface. It's a property of string theories and quantum gravity.
An important argument for the holographic principle is the entropy of black holes. The event horizon, as the interface of the black hole formed by the Schwarzschild radius, is a direct measure of the entropy or information content of the enclosed volume of space and thus of the masses contained within. A black hole always represents the maximum possible concentration of matter in a region of space and thus also the upper limit of possible entropy (Bekenstein limit) or information in the volume of space it occupies.

The holographic principle postulates that any information that exceeds the event horizon of a black hole is fully encoded on the interface spanned by the Schwarzschild radius, similar to a two-dimensional hologram that contains three-dimensional image information.

Since the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole is only directly proportional to its mass, the encodable volume grows with the square of the surface area. In order to encode four times the volume, only a doubling of the interface is necessary, or in other words, the information density of a region of space decreases with its volume (as analogously, with the size of a black hole its average mass density decreases).

A particularly well elaborated special case is the correspondence between anti-de-sitter space (AdS) and conformal field theory (CFT) discovered in 1997. Anti-de-Sitter space represents a possible solution of Einstein's field equations with negative cosmological constant. Conformal field theories show a particularly high degree of symmetry. Correspondence is understood as a dual description of physical phenomena by two different theories.

Originally, the duality was formulated by Juan Maldacena for a Type IIB string theory on a product of a five-dimensional anti-de-sitter space and a 5-sphere on one side, and a special conformal field theory, the N=4 supersymmetric Yang Mills theory (SYM), on the four-dimensional edge of the AdS space on the other side.

There are now generalizations of this situation and it is assumed that the assumption is confirmed in greater generality, although no complete mathematical proof of the correspondence exists. However, there are a large number of clues that arise in limit cases of correspondence where both sides (both string theory and conformal field theory) can be calculated.
 
I realy like this theory for me this may be the most compelling theory
LEVEL 1: IF YOU GO FAR ENOUGH, YOU’LL GET BACK HOME

LEVEL 2: IF YOU GO FAR ENOUGH, YOU’LL FALL INTO WONDERLAND

LEVEL 3: IF YOU STAY WHERE YOU ARE, YOU’LL RUN INTO YOURSELF

LEVEL 4: SOMEWHERE OVER THE RAINBOW, THERE’S A MAGICAL LAND
 
Have you ever heard of the inflation theory its about what was before the bing bang, i read about it but i haven't fully understand it
 
Have you ever heard of the inflation theory its about what was before the bing bang, i read about it but i haven't fully understand it
It is a theory of a scalar energy field occupying a ‘false vacuum’ state, which then decays to a lower energy state. This would likely be the current value of dark energy.

When it decays, after some 10^-32 seconds from the beginning, it dumps its energy into particles and radiation.

While it persists as a false vacuum and with negative pressure, it causes the universe to expand tremendously according to the de Sitter solution in general relativity for a homogeneous universe. There are at least 50 e-foldings, that is the linear scale grows by a factor e^50 or more.

At the end, what was extremely microscopic, for our local universe, has become of size of order 10 centimeters. It continues to expand to this day due to the radiation pressure and kinetic energy deposited.

We do not know what form the potential for the scalar energy ‘inflaton’ field took, various possibilities are proposed and the Planck satellite results are supportive of simple inflation models. The simple R^2 model and some others with around 50 or 60 e-foldings fit the tensor-to-scalar and primordial tilt constraints.
 
It is a theory of a scalar energy field occupying a ‘false vacuum’ state, which then decays to a lower energy state. This would likely be the current value of dark energy.

When it decays, after some 10^-32 seconds from the beginning, it dumps its energy into particles and radiation.

While it persists as a false vacuum and with negative pressure, it causes the universe to expand tremendously according to the de Sitter solution in general relativity for a homogeneous universe. There are at least 50 e-foldings, that is the linear scale grows by a factor e^50 or more.

At the end, what was extremely microscopic, for our local universe, has become of size of order 10 centimeters. It continues to expand to this day due to the radiation pressure and kinetic energy deposited.

We do not know what form the potential for the scalar energy ‘inflaton’ field took, various possibilities are proposed and the Planck satellite results are supportive of simple inflation models. The simple R^2 model and some others with around 50 or 60 e-foldings fit the tensor-to-scalar and primordial tilt constraints.
According to these then is it possible for another bing bang to happen
 
Then the it form the bing bang
The Big Bang model of cosmology posits that the universe began as a space containing an infinite density of radiation: space then expanded (to its current state), and the radiation grew less dense, producing matter etc. as it did so. This means that the Big Bang is still actually going on, and inflation is not a theory separate from the Big Bang model: it is incorporated within it. An extremely energetic and extremely short-lived period of inflation occurred shortly after the Big Bang, and a slower phase of inflation then continued (to the present day). 8.8 billion years ago, the expansionary effect of inflation overtook the slowing-down effect of gravity, so expansion is now speeding up.
 
Then what is your take on another biological complex being out there , do you think its possible for another complex life form out there in our galaxy or is it just us,
 
According to these then is it possible for another bing bang to happen
The basic idea of inflation is that at an extremely early period in the life of the universe, like a tiny fraction of the first second, the universe expanded in size by some ridiculous factor. This would have stretched everything out so rapidly that any little variations or quantum fluctuations got smeared out over huge distances. Flip that on its head, and the entire visible universe was once all contained within a very small volume, so that the stuff on one side of the visible universe and stuff on the opposite side of the visible universe were once very close together* for a brief moment and could be in thermal equilibrium with each other. This would prevent them from becoming very different from each other.

It is proposed that this crazy fast expansion was driven by some energy field, called appropriately enough the inflationary field. We don’t know this yet, but it has been proposed that dark energy is a remnant of that field. If so then it never really went away, it just changed form. Kinda like water evaporating into a gas - some of its properties change and it becomes invisible, but it still exists.

If the inflationary field still exists, then could it undergo another phase change again in the future? Quantum tunneling and other weird quantum fluctuations are known to occur in many systems, so could something like that cause the inflationary field, at some future point in space and time, to revert back to its old form, essentially driving a new Big Bang?

Some physicist, again I don’t remember which one, has mused that this could also lead to an infinite multiverse with evolutionary properties like I described in my first answer (below). IOW, this could fix the fine tuning problem. But, it seems to me that there’s an important difference to ponder. In the black hole hypothesis, each new daughter universe is “walled off” from its mother universe by the event horizon. But in an “inflationary” multiverse, it isn’t clear to me that this would be the case. Instead of the daughter universe being contained within its own space-time, it occurs within the mother universe’s space-time. If that’s the case, then the answer to your question appears to be YES.

On the third hand, even if such a thing happens, it may be so improbable that it won’t happen for trillions of years. At that point, our universe will be well into its “heat death” phase and you and I will be loooooooong into our, well, death phase. So it’s nothing to worry about.

On the fourth hand, this is again all quite speculative, and could very easily be quite wrong. Another reason not to worry.
 
On the third hand, even if such a thing happens, it may be so improbable that it won’t happen for trillions of years. At that point, our universe will be well into its “heat death” phase and you and I will be loooooooong into our, well, death phase. So it’s nothing to worry about.
So in other hand one can say that may be our bing bang was not the first one may be there was other infinite number of bing bang before us with different laws of physics
 
Then what is your take on another biological complex being out there , do you think its possible for another complex life form out there in our galaxy or is it just us,
There isn’t a single shred of evidence that there are multiple universes, nor is there any way to test the conjecture. In other words, it is entirely speculative and imaginary. The laws of physics, as we understand them currently, do not specifically prohibit the existence of other universes, but neither do they predict them.

As a consequence, one can speculate that they all did or did not start with an initial singularity. One can imagine that they all have the same time, different times, or even that some of them don’t have any “time” dimension at all. One can even conjecture that some of them are inhabited by magical rainbow glitter farting unicorns who propel new universes into existence every time they eat Brussels sprouts and get too gassy. Since by definition other universes would not have to obey the same laws of physics that this universe is bound by, one gets to make up any kind of rules for them one likes so long as they are internally consistent.

This is not science. It is fantasy/science fiction at its finest. It can be fun to toy with the notion, particularly after a few drinks or a fat spliff, but it would make about as much sense to take such speculation seriously as it would to believe in the actual existence of invisible magical entities totally exempt from the laws of nature. Since you have defined them as invisible and magical, there is no way to disprove their existence, but there is also no way to demonstrate that they do, in fact, exist either.

There are plenty of people who do believe fervently in the existence or invisible magical entities totally exempt from the laws of physics, but in the absence of evidence, one cannot fault those who think such beliefs delusional. According to current research, roughly 28% of children ages 5 to 12 have imaginary friends. Probably more than half of children aged 3 to 5 do. That does not constitute evidence that those legions of imaginary friends are real
 
images (4).jpeg

So do you really think in that massive galaxy in an infinite universe life just happen to be in that solar system in a small planet
 
View attachment 3265576
So do you really think in that massive galaxy in an infinite universe life just happen to be in that solar system in a small planet
We are the center of our little corner of our part of the universe.

Like a baby in their playpen is the center of their universe. They have an idea that there is other rooms to the house, but they don't know much about them. They are clueless about cities on the other side of the planet.

We understand that this solar system has other planets. We now know we are not on the center body or the biggest planet. We know our sun is fairly average sized and is rotating around the center of a galaxy. We're in a spur off one arm of a fairly large galaxy in a cluster of galaxies.

This galaxy is one of billions of galaxies arranged in enormous filaments going out as far as we can see. We are pretty sure that the universe is bigger than as far as we can see, but we have no idea how much bigger.

There are probably aliens out there somewhere. Space is just too big and harsh for interstellar travel. The distances are too vast for interstellar communication. They will never know us, or we them.

Earth is not really important, except to us.
 
There are probably aliens out there somewhere. Space is just too big and harsh for interstellar travel. The distances are too vast for interstellar communication. They will never know us, or we them.
What if they do know about us, what if because they more advance in technology than us then there satellites may be small like smart phone and we cant see them or may be their satellite or telescope are far but they can see at a far distance
 
Then what is your take on another biological complex being out there , do you think its possible for another complex life form out there in our galaxy or is it just us,
To me, i do believe that there must be life outside our world.
 
Back
Top Bottom