Total Kenya parent firm buys Maersk Oil in $7.5 bn deal

Total Kenya parent firm buys Maersk Oil in $7.5 bn deal

Total S.A. to acquire Mærsk Olie og Gas A/S for USD 7.45bn and make Denmark a regional hub

21 August, 2017

A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S [A.P. Moller - Maersk] has today signed an agreement to sell Mærsk Olie og Gas A/S [Maersk Oil] to Total S.A [Total] for USD 7.45bn in a combined share and debt transaction.



Tyra East.

Maersk Oil will become part of a leading global oil and gas operator with a long-term investment interest in the sector. Total will take over Maersk Oil’s entire organisation, portfolio, obligations and rights with minimal pre-conditions. Planned development schedules and investments in strategic and sanctioned projects will be upheld.

With the agreement A.P. Moller - Maersk is taking a material step forward in its strategy to separate out its oil and oil related activities to create an integrated transport & logistics company, and this transaction will contribute significantly to upholding its strong capital structure.

“In determining the best future ownership structure for Maersk Oil, it has been imperative for us that the capabilities and assets created in Maersk Oil continue to be developed, and that long-term investments are upheld, especially in the Danish part of the North Sea,” says Søren Skou, CEO of A.P. Moller - Maersk and continues:

“The valuation of Maersk Oil and Total’s commitment is a testament to the quality and standing of Maersk Oil. In addition, the agreement will strengthen the financial flexibility of A.P. Moller - Maersk and free up resources to focus our future growth on container shipping, ports and logistics.”

Denmark will become the regional hub for all Total’s operations in Denmark, Norway and the Netherlands, based on Maersk Oil’s capabilities and strong position in the North Sea region.

“Maersk Oil’s activities across the North Sea will become part of a leading global operator with a strong performance record and long-term growth interest in the sector. The combination of Total and Maersk Oil’s global footprint and geographical overlap will ensure the continued development of Maersk Oil’s worldwide strategic and selective assets. By selling to Total, we ensure a continued Danish stronghold in the North Sea based on Maersk Oil’s leading position within technology development and its track record as a lean, efficient and trusted partner. Importantly, Maersk Oil will remain close to its technology and innovation partners at the Danish technical institutions and in the oil and gas service industry to the benefit of all parties,” says Claus V. Hemmingsen, Vice CEO of A.P. Moller - Maersk and CEO of the Energy division.

Patrick Pouyanné, Chairman and CEO of Total, commented that:

“I welcome Maersk Oil to the Total family. Building on Maersk Oil’s high safety standards, strong technological leadership, operational excellence and strong Danish heritage, we will intensify and accelerate the push to optimise and extend the Danish oil and gas production. The addition of Maersk Oil’s strong capabilities and high quality assets to our business will create a leading international operator in the North West European offshore region, making Denmark a regional anchor point for Total’s North Sea business. With Maersk Oil’s technical and operating competencies and Total’s experience and strong financial position, we have an exceptional opportunity to boost the combined competitive position in several core upstream regions and deliver growth, value creation and career opportunities.”

A.P. Moller - Maersk has been the main operator in the Danish North Sea for half a century, establishing and maintaining Denmark’s position as self-sufficient within oil and gas. With Maersk Oil at the forefront, the Danish oil and gas industry has contributed DKK 400bn in taxes to Denmark over the past 50 years, and provides employment to 15.000 people in the sector. In addition, Maersk Oil has significant presence in the British and Norwegian sectors, with nine licenses in Norway, including an 8.44% ownership of Johan Sverdrup, one of Norway’s largest discoveries ever. In the United Kingdom, Maersk Oil operates several offshore installations, as well as leading a number of project developments; most notably the Culzean gas development, where Maersk Oil is the operator and holds a 49.9 % ownership.

“Our future position as the regional hub for Total’s operations in Denmark, Norway and the Netherlands, recognises Maersk Oil’s status in the North Sea region. In Denmark, the focus will continue to be on investing in safe, efficient growth from existing fields. The capabilities, experiences and partnerships, which made Maersk Oil a globally recognised technology leader and trusted operator, will contribute to Total’s position in the entire North Sea and worldwide. In addition, the agreement presents new opportunities for our employees, as Maersk Oil joins a global industry leader,” says Gretchen Watkins, CEO of Maersk Oil.

The separation of the energy businesses was decided as part of last year’s strategic decision to focus A.P. Moller - Maersk’s future activities on transport and logistics, as well as a result of recent years’ oil and gas industry and market developments. Maersk Oil is the first of the four energy companies of A.P. Moller - Maersk for which a future structural solution has now been identified. The solutions for Maersk Drilling, Maersk Supply Service and Maersk Tankers remain to be defined before the end of 2018.

In a comment to the transaction, Chairman of A.P. Møller Holding A/S, Ane Mærsk Mc-Kinney Uggla states:

“In my heart and mind, this is a very difficult, but right decision. Maersk Oil has for almost half a century been at the forefront of the Danish oil development, been vital to A.P. Moller - Maersk and to this very day plays a decisive role in the Danish and international oil and gas industry. This gives us pride. As owners, we seek the best foundation for the future growth of the Maersk Oil activities and the focused development of the Danish North Sea. A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S has found a dedicated industry owner with a sincere interest in further developing and investing in the assets and capabilities created in Maersk Oil, while preserving the heritage of Denmark's leading oil company. On behalf of A.P. Moller Holding, I wish to thank all our employees in Maersk Oil for their vast achievements and relentless dedication to A.P. Moller - Maersk.”

The agreement is subject to regulatory approval from relevant authorities, including the Danish Minister of Energy, Utilities and Climate and relevant competition authorities. Closing is expected to take place during first quarter, 2018.

A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S has today released the following information in a Stock Exchange Announcement:

Today, A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S (APMM) has entered into an agreement to sell Mærsk Olie og Gas A/S (“Maersk Oil”) to Total S.A. for USD 7.45bn in a combined share and debt transaction.

APMM will receive an enterprise value per 30 June 2017 of USD 7.45bn paid by 97.5m shares in Total S.A. with a value of USD 4.95bn equal to approx. 3.76% of Total S.A. (post issuing shares to APMM). In addition to the shares Total S.A. is assuming a short-term debt of USD 2.5bn via debt push down from APMM into Maersk Oil. Total S.A. will pay an interest of 3% p.a. of the enterprise value from 30 June 2017 and until closing of the transaction. Total S.A. will take over all decommissioning obligations currently amounting to USD 2.9bn.

The short-term debt will be repaid to APMM at or shortly after closing of the transaction and the proceeds will be used by APMM to reduce debt. Subject to meeting its investment grade objective, APMM plan to return a material portion of the value of the received Total S.A. shares to the APMM shareholders during the course of 2018/19 in the form of extraordinary dividend, share buyback and/or distribution of Total S.A. shares.

Total S.A. will maintain Maersk Oil’s strong position in the North Sea with strong Copenhagen and Esbjerg bases and with Denmark being the operating hub for Total S.A.’s combined operations in Denmark, Norway and the Netherlands.

The transaction is subject to regulatory approval from relevant authorities including the Danish Minister of Energy, Utilities and Climate and competition authorities as well as required consultation and notification processes with Total S.A.’s employee representatives. Closing is expected to take place during Q1 2018. Calculated as of 30 June 2017, the transaction gain after tax for APMM amounts to USD 2.8bn. The accounting gain will be recorded partly from earnings until closing and the residual at closing.

As a consequence of the transaction Maersk Oil will be classified as held-for-sale and discontinued operations in the Interim Report Q3 2017 for APMM. APMM’s financial guidance for 2017 remains un-changed except for the effect of the reclassification of Maersk Oil.

Contacts

Louise Münter
Head of Corporate Communication, A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S, Energy division louise.munter@maersk.com
+45 4048 6634

Or

Helene Aagaard
Senior Communication Advisor, A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S, Energy division, helene.aagaard@maersk.com
+45 2346 7633


Please join the teleconference on Monday, 21 August 2017 at 10:00am CET, following the announcement.

Group CEO Søren Skou, Group Vice CEO Claus Hemmingsen and Group CFO Jakob Stausholm will present the transaction announced followed by a question and answer session. The teleconference will be broadcasted live and will also be available on the IR website on demand afterwards.

The direct link ishttps://getvisualtv.dk/stream/maersk-conference-call-210817/


Total S.A. to acquire Mærsk Olie og Gas A/S for USD 7.45bn and make Denmark a regional hub

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
The thing is this is a new sector to Kenya n u don't know how it plays the company with money has muscles always. U will get schooled, Believe me ur little oil will be transported via Tanga as Museveni hinted!

Six months from now every move will be completed. FYI, Tullow Uganda has been reduced to minority shareholder the same will happen in Kenya. The map shows even the proximity is shorter to Hoima n more economical feasible when combined with South Sudan's [emoji23]

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
umepewa jibu mwafaka na rahisi mno mpaka ukawekewa picha na potential routes...kazi kwako sasa...use ur common sense
 
For that case Pipeline from Lokichar to Lamu is a forgotten story. No bank will raise funds without assurance from multinational companies of which Total is the sole kingmaker n is consolidating each asset to make sure Hoima-Tanga pipeline is most profitable.

Sent from my SM-J320F using JamiiForums mobile app
Do you know how companies operate? If two or more shareholders can't agree on any decision, the majority shareholder has the final say. The majority shareholder also has the most voting rights in case a vote between shareholders takes place. In this case Tullow oil is the majority shareholder and they can overide any stupid position that Total may decide to take. Even in companies majority have their way kwa hivyo wacha kucelebrate.Total is just a minority shareholder they have no influence in Turkana.
 
Ndugu namweleza Geza msumbufu kuwa katika kila kampuni, mtu anayemiliki hisa zaidi ya nusu ndiye afanyaye maamuzi yote kuhusu kampuni hiyo. Hapa Kenya Tullow oil ndio mumiliki wa hisa nusu ya kampuni hiyo na Total inamiliki hisa asilimia ishirini na tano. Kwa hivyo Total haiwezi kuamua jambo lolote katika kampuni hiyo kwani Tullow oil wanaweza badilisha uamuzi huo. Lakini Tullow oil wanapoamua jambo fulani Total hawana uwezo wa kuibadilisha. Mumiliki wa hisa zaidi ya asilimia hamsini na moja (51%) ndio anaitwa "majority shareholder"
 
Do you know how companies operate? If two or more shareholders can't agree on any decision, the majority shareholder has the final say. The majority shareholder also has the most voting rights in case a vote between shareholders takes place. In this case Tullow oil is the majority shareholder and they can overide any stupid position that Total may decide to take. Even in companies majority have their way kwa hivyo wacha kucelebrate.Total is just a minority shareholder they have no influence in Turkana.
Total is to acquire Tullow Oil Kenya. Mark my words!

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
The thing is this is a new sector to Kenya n u don't know how it plays the company with money has muscles always. U will get schooled, Believe me ur little oil will be transported via Tanga as Museveni hinted!

Six months from now every move will be completed. FYI, Tullow Uganda has been reduced to minority shareholder the same will happen in Kenya. The map shows even the proximity is shorter to Hoima n more economical feasible when combined with South Sudan's [emoji23]

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app


The thing is u don't know how oil business work! The more consolidation the cheaper the running costs n the more the profit. Looking at topology it is easier n shorter to connect Lokichar n South Sudan to Hoima than Lokichar to Lamu n that's what Total is doing buying all potential rivals n connect all the oil fields via one pipeline. You will soon learn that, no company will guarantee Kenya going solo on pipeline.

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
Total wouldn't be acquiring Maersk oil fields in Kenya if the oil there was "Little", whether they build a pipeline through Kenya or Uganda...it would cost atleast $1.7 Billion as both routes are atleast 450km.


You have been hating on Kenya all this time, but your biggest problem it seems is that you have never understood how Kenya works.. You call us 'Nyang'aus' and we let you, you call us "bepari" we never deny it... One thing you need to understand is that in Kenya...... "Money talks". All this you here about Kenya building its pipeline its all about one thing only.. Money.... pure and simple, there is nothing about pride or being rude or being stubborn or being patriotic.. money money money.. So don't even bother trying to think what will Kenya do...even if today Some multinational comes to Kenya and says they want to transport Kenya's oil to the moon and back before exporting it... They just have to show us one thing in a piece of paper>>>> That that plan will get us more money than what we had in mind! Period!!!

So if Total manages to buy Tullow and Africa oil in Kenya (Remember, any acquisition has to be approved by the host government first for it to be a done deal --this includes the acquisition of Maersk oil fields by Total!), And if Total tells GOK that they want to build the pipeline through Uganda to Tanga, They just need one thing for Kenya to agree>>> that in the end Kenya will benefit more in the long run....

For that to happen it means Uganda will have to guarantee not to charge Kenya any tariff (Unlike what Kenya was going to do to Uganda's oil)....... And Tanzania will also do the same--- That is the only way that will make Transporting Kenyas oil through Tanga cheaper.....
I understand Tanzania already waived almost all the fees to Uganda's oil and that is the reason that 90% of Uganda's decision was based on when they accepted the Tanga route, Kenya was going to charge Uganda/Total everything including Land tariff, Environmental impact, relocation of people., security manpower..... plus the usual pipeline tarrif and when the oil reaches Lamu, we would charge them storage fee as the oil awaits Tanker ships




Tanzania Pipeline Deal Reflects Uganda’s Practical and Strategic Concerns
Uganda’s foreign affairs minister also highlighted the issue of relative costs of the rival routes. The projected cost of the Tanzania route is approximately $4 billion, up to $1 billion less than going via Kenya. Kenya’s proposed tariff was almost $17 per barrel, compared to Tanzania’s $12 per barrel. Uganda’s energy minister has also reported that Tanzania has waived land fees, transit charges and taxes associated with the pipeline − if true, this is unlikely to be viable in the long-term.


Of coarse this scenario can only play out If and only If Total is a majority shareholder in Kenyan oilfields.... Something which is unlikely
 
Total wouldn't be acquiring Maersk oil fields in Kenya if the oil there was "Little", whether they build a pipeline through Kenya or Uganda...it would cost atleast $1.7 Billion as both routes are atleast 450km.


You have been hating on Kenya all this time, but your biggest problem it seems is that you have never understood how Kenya works.. You call us 'Nyang'aus' and we let you, you call us "bepari" we never deny it... One thing you need to understand is that in Kenya...... "Money talks". All this you here about Kenya building its pipeline its all about one thing only.. Money.... pure and simple, there is nothing about pride or being rude or being stubborn or being patriotic.. money money money.. So don't even bother trying to think what will Kenya do...even if today Some multinational comes to Kenya and says they want to transport Kenya's oil to the moon and back before exporting it... They just have to show us one thing in a piece of paper>>>> That that plan will get us more money than what we had in mind! Period!!!

So if Total manages to buy Tullow and Africa oil in Kenya (Remember, any acquisition has to be approved by the host government first for it to be a done deal --this includes the acquisition of Maersk oil fields by Total!), And if Total tells GOK that they want to build the pipeline through Uganda to Tanga, They just need one thing for Kenya to agree>>> that in the end Kenya will benefit more in the long run....

For that to happen it means Uganda will have to guarantee not to charge Kenya any tariff (Unlike what Kenya was going to do to Uganda's oil)....... And Tanzania will also do the same--- That is the only way that will make Transporting Kenyas oil through Tanga cheaper.....
I understand Tanzania already waived almost all the fees to Uganda's oil and that is the reason that 90% of Uganda's decision was based on when they accepted the Tanga route, Kenya was going to charge Uganda/Total everything including Land tariff, Environmental impact, relocation of people., security manpower..... plus the usual pipeline tarrif and when the oil reaches Lamu, we would charge them storage fee as the oil awaits Tanker ships




Tanzania Pipeline Deal Reflects Uganda’s Practical and Strategic Concerns
Uganda’s foreign affairs minister also highlighted the issue of relative costs of the rival routes. The projected cost of the Tanzania route is approximately $4 billion, up to $1 billion less than going via Kenya. Kenya’s proposed tariff was almost $17 per barrel, compared to Tanzania’s $12 per barrel. Uganda’s energy minister has also reported that Tanzania has waived land fees, transit charges and taxes associated with the pipeline − if true, this is unlikely to be viable in the long-term.


Of coarse this scenario can only play out If and only If Total is a majority shareholder in Kenyan oilfields.... Something which is unlikely
All that said u just confirmed my theory economy of scales will be a way forward a reason Total after having DRC n South Sudan in the bag they r digging in for the Lokichar to have one pipeline that supply the whole region. Who do u think will guarantee ur pipeline to nowhere? [emoji23]

BTW I did not invent the name nyang'au n for that case there is no reason to name me over that tag, has been there n will remain there. A lot of people in here call u nyang'au n for that case u don't need to single me out may be my calling pains u most. Sorry for that...

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
All that said u just confirmed my theory economy of scales will be a way forward a reason Total after having DRC n South Sudan in the bag they r digging in for the Lokichar to have one pipeline that supply the whole region. Who do u think will guarantee ur pipeline to nowhere? [emoji23]

BTW I did not invent the name nyang'au n for that case there is no reason to name me over that tag, has been there n will remain there. A lot of people in here call u nyang'au n for that case u don't need to single me out may be my calling pains u most. Sorry for that...

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
I did not single you out, When I wrote that particular sentence, the 'You' was meant to mean Tanzanians, as in all of You...
And there is no shame in seeing you ppl using that word, whether you mean to insult or out of frustration from kenya's dominance, I usually smile when I see someone use those words, it usually means dawa imeingia kabisa, unaskia machungu..

And to answer your question, Yes, Economies of scale will always be a big factor, but you are missing a very crucial insight, 'Muamba ngozi huvuta kwake'.

There is economy of scale For Tullow, EoS for Total, EoS for GOK and Kenya..


If Total were to build a pipeline from Kenya to Uganda to connect to Tanga...The economy of scale would be to Total! Because essentially It would bring em more profits to transport oil from all the countries having used less money if you look at the total length of the connected pipelines...


But to Tullow oil + Africa oil who together account for 75% share of Kenyas oil, Total having the rest of minority 25%, will now own the pipeline that is supposed to Transport all the oil which means Tullow and Africa oil will have to pay money to Use Totals pipeline all the way to Tanga (Tz might not charge tariffs to the other countries but don't think Total wont charge tariffs to the other oil companies for using its pipeline) , Remember in this context Tullow and Total are rivals.. Tullow bieng the majority shareholder of the kenyan oil will not see sense in paying a minority holder of kenyan oil to transport her oil.. Tullow would want a pipeline they have a significant say in since they control a majority of the oil in kenya.


On the other hand, The Kenyan government wont see EoS knowing very well that if the pipeline goes to Lamu, there is more money to be made considering Kenya also has plans to build a Refinery in Isiolo that would (in the future) refine the Turkana oil and build another pipeline for refined petrolium to Ethiopia and Nairobi , So no matter what happens , Kenya wants to build a crude pipeline from Lamu to isiolo to supply that refinery for Kenya and Ethiopia .... So it makes sense to connect with Lokichar oilfields in Turkana... So For GoK, a pipeline to Tanga is counter productive for Keny's plans ... Unless ofcouse Total can promise Kenya lots of free stuff and lots of profits in the process if they accept Totals pipeline deal... I mean who doesn't like free stuff right? As someone I know likes to say, 'Sikutaki lakini uki niachia bure sikatai'
 
I did not single you out, When I wrote that particular sentence, the 'You' was meant to mean Tanzanians, as in all of You...
And there is no shame in seeing you ppl using that word, whether you mean to insult or out of frustration from kenya's dominance, I usually smile when I see someone use those words, it usually means dawa imeingia kabisa, unaskia machungu..

And to answer your question, Yes, Economies of scale will always be a big factor, but you are missing a very crucial insight, 'Muamba ngozi huvuta kwake'.

There is economy of scale For Tullow, EoS for Total, EoS for GOK and Kenya..


If Total were to build a pipeline from Kenya to Uganda to connect to Tanga...The economy of scale would be to Total! Because essentially It would bring em more profits to transport oil from all the countries having used less money if you look at the total length of the connected pipelines...


But to Tullow oil + Africa oil who together account for 75% share of Kenyas oil, Total having the rest of minority 25%, will now own the pipeline that is supposed to Transport all the oil which means Tullow and Africa oil will have to pay money to Use Totals pipeline all the way to Tanga (Tz might not charge tariffs to the other countries but don't think Total wont charge tariffs to the other oil companies for using its pipeline) , Remember in this context Tullow and Total are rivals.. Tullow bieng the majority shareholder of the kenyan oil will not see sense in paying a minority holder of kenyan oil to transport her oil.. Tullow would want a pipeline they have a significant say in since they control a majority of the oil in kenya.


On the other hand, The Kenyan government wont see EoS knowing very well that if the pipeline goes to Lamu, there is more money to be made considering Kenya also has plans to build a Refinery in Isiolo that would (in the future) refine the Turkana oil and build another pipeline for refined petrolium to Ethiopia and Nairobi , So no matter what happens , Kenya wants to build a crude pipeline from Lamu to isiolo to supply that refinery for Kenya and Ethiopia .... So it makes sense to connect with Lokichar oilfields in Turkana... So For GoK, a pipeline to Tanga is counter productive for Keny's plans ... Unless ofcouse Total can promise Kenya lots of free stuff and lots of profits in the process if they accept Totals pipeline deal... I mean who doesn't like free stuff right? As someone I know likes to say, 'Sikutaki lakini uki niachia bure sikatai'
Ati nini Kenya can influence direction of oil flow? U wait n see that little oil won't be extracted. And no bank will finance a pipeline to nowhere without guarantee from oil companies. Keep watching Tullow Kenya is next in Total's acquisition list.

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Ati nini Kenya can influence direction of oil flow? U wait n see that little oil won't be extracted. And no bank will finance a pipeline to nowhere without guarantee from oil companies. Keep watching Tullow Kenya is next in Total's acquisition list.

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
Da! Isn't government the one that awards and cancels mining licences?

For every deal that an oil company makes with another one, it is subject to approval by the govnment.. Obviously before the government approves, they will have to sit down with Total and ask Total what their general plan is..

Total on the other hand will want to be on the good side of the government so that they don't get bogged down with govt beaurocracy.

Its all about give and take, between Total and GoK who more leverage at this time... There is still exploration going on in Nyanza around Kisumu and also in Lamu offshore ...
*If Total tells GoK that no one will build a separate pipeline and try to use that as leverage.

* GoK could also tell Total , ' well maybe we will just wait it out until we discover more oil and build our own pipeline and we wont hand over any licences for extraction of oil in the meantime"
 
Da! Isn't government the one that awards and cancels mining licences?

For every deal that an oil company makes with another one, it is subject to approval by the govnment.. Obviously before the government approves, they will have to sit down with Total and ask Total what their general plan is..

Total on the other hand will want to be on the good side of the government so that they don't get bogged down with govt beaurocracy.

Its all about give and take, between Total and GoK who more leverage at this time... There is still exploration going on in Nyanza around Kisumu and also in Lamu offshore ...
*If tullow tells GoK that no one will build a separate pipeline and try to use that as leverage.

* GoK could also tell Total , ' well maybe we will just wait it out until we discover more oil and build our own pipeline and we wont hand over any licences for extraction of oil in the meantime"
Ohk we will see if 600 mln barrels of oil can tilt the equilibrium.

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Back
Top Bottom