Uganda: WB Boss Slams Uganda's Projects Tanzania White Elephant

Uganda: WB Boss Slams Uganda's Projects Tanzania White Elephant

Niksta254

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2017
Posts
397
Reaction score
214
The World Bank has poured cold water on Uganda’s infrastructure development saying it is wasted investment that is not helping the economy grow.

It warned of harder economic times unless something is done to make the country’s mega projects generate revenue from the public investments that Kampala has borrowed billions of dollars to finance.

“Why do projects suddenly appear yet they have inadequate justification? Contracting procedures based on poor feasibility studies coupled with inadequate supervision lead to large cost overruns and poor quality work. That’s not good value for taxpayer’s money and certainly not the kind of debt anyone would like their children to repay,” World Bank Uganda Country Manager Christina Malmberg Calvo said at the fourth national partnership forum last week.

The forum is a platform where all development partners and government come together to discuss and review progress in national development programmes that have been financed using loans from different creditors outside the country.

'No value for money'

Ms Calvo said the World Bank is fully aware of Uganda’s decelerated economic growth over the last couple of years and shares concerns of Ugandans because most of the infrastructure programmes government has implemented are not delivering value for money.

“Uganda is not reaping the returns on its public investment programme — you get less than one shilling for every shilling you invest. You should be getting four, five or six times your investment. What’s wrong? The public investment process is not working as it should be,” Ms Calvo said.

She also expressed concern that Uganda is headed towards a population explosion of 80 million people by 2040 yet the economy was decelerating.

The country's Prime Minister Ruhakana Rugunda, who chaired the meeting, said the forum helps both government and donors to review progress against targets and set new ones for the coming year.

The forum comprises ministries, departments and agencies’ heads and development partners.

In the 2016/17 national budget speech, Finance Minister Matia Kasaija announced that Uganda was prioritising funding to strategic infrastructure projects in the transport, energy and ICT sectors.

He reasoned that their development contributed immensely to increased productivity by facilitating connectivity and easing movement of goods.

Some of the projects include:

$220 million for the China Uganda Agricultural Industrial Park

$3,827.54 billion for nationwide transport infrastructure

$325 million for Entebbe International Airport upgrade

$3.55 billion for a pipeline and access roads to facilitate oil production

my take

Cant wait to read what the Pathetic Tanzanians will say about their Pipe Line.
 
Why the World Bank backed out of project
By PAUL WAFULA | Sunday, Feb 2nd 2014 at 00:00


Share this story:


prezzo-2214-main.jpg

President Uhuru Kenyatta addresses the nation. [PHOTO: FILE/STANDARD]

By PAUL WAFULA

There is no economic or financial case for a new standard gauge railway in East Africa, a World Bank report says.

It is this report that informed the bank’s decision to back out from funding the project.

Instead, the bank, which considered four alternatives, preferred that Kenya should refurbish or upgrade the current line to a higher standard, using the same gauge.





“There is no economic or financial case for standard gauge in East African Community area at this time. A refurbished metre gauge would appear to be the most appropriate option in economic and financial terms,” the report prepared by the lender’s Africa transport unit reads in part.

The report, titled The Economics of Rail Gauge in the East Africa Community, is dated August 2013.

“Investment in standard gauge appears only to be justified if the new infrastructure could attract additional freight in the order of 20 to 55 million tonnes per year,” the report says.

But based on the traffic forecasts undertaken for the EAC railway master plan, it continues to say, and more recent work undertaken on the central line in Tanzania, these volumes would appear to be unattainable over the medium to longer term.

The Standard on Sunday has also learnt that the World Bank has already hired two consultants to study the current deal between Kenya and China in more detail to inform how it engages the country on future financing projects.

The report considered rehabilitating the existing network to the original standard gauge as the first development alternative. It also analysed refurbishing the current network to a higher standard, with the same gauge as the second option.

New right of way





The third alternative was for the region to upgrade the network to a higher standard, with a different gauge such as the standard gauge on the same alignment. Kenya chose the fourth option, constructing a new right of way from scratch.

A powerpoint presentation seen by The Standard on Sunday shows that Kenya had approached the international lender to negotiate a funding deal.

When he appeared before the Public Investment Committee, Treasury Cabinet Secretary Henry Rotich said Kenya did not get any other interested financiers, and this forced the Government to play by the rules of the Chinese Government.

According to the 2012 presentation by Transport PS Nduva Muli to the World Bank delegation, Kenya Railways wanted to build the Standard Gauge Railway using the American Standard, known as AREMA. But this changed after the funding came from China.

But sources familiar with the plan say the project, if viable, would attract less costly funding such as Build-Operate-Transfer, where the investor builds and operates the line at a profit to recoup their money, before handing it back to the Kenyan Government after an agreed timeframe.

According to its analysis, the first option – rehabilitating the existing railway network – would allow a phased approach to its development, consistent with current and projected demand and the financing envelope available. The report notes that this would represent the most cost effective option for the development of the railway infrastructure.

But it ruled this out because it would pose major capacity constraints given that the maximum amount of traffic that this could accommodate was 5.5 million tonnes per year, far below the 14.4 million tonnes of freight forecasted per year in the region by 2030.





The second alternative, which was preferred by the World Bank, would see the refurbishing or upgrading the railway network to the same gauge. This would imply a far more substantial intervention. But the report says that though this option would be more expensive upfront, it is still cost effective since it allows for re-use of materials and existing right of way and would have the capacity to deliver three times more than the required traffic volumes.

The third option considered was the upgrading the existing metre gauge to a standard gauge but sticking on the same alignment.

The report notes that this alternative would involve construction of a new railway along the same alignment. It would be more expensive but it is less costly than the construction of a standard gauge railway on a completely new alignment since it would save costs on land acquisition, among others.

Constructing a standard gauge railway on a new right of way is the fourth option explored in the report.

This option requires additional investment in land acquisition and structures, and new right of way construction. This is the alternative the Kenyan Government has chosen.

But what is more is that Kenya did not just pick on the most expensive option, but it will end up building the line at a much more costlier price than what World Bank had expected.

Why the World Bank backed out of project


 
Source? Kampala-Malaba SGR is missing while Mombasa-Malaba was also slaymen by the same WB! The thing is WB is sidelined from these projects, a reason for all this noise. No wonder..

UR crude oil pipe line is a hoax... Just to benefit Total..
 
UR crude oil pipe line is a hoax... Just to benefit Total..


pipeline race
The country's oil-export pipeline will make progress. Tanzania's LNG plans probably won’t
Construction of a $3.55bn pipeline to take up to 200,000 barrels a day of oil 1,445km from the Albertine Basin of landlocked Uganda to the Tanzanian coast will be in full tilt in 2018. Oil should flow by 2020—at last giving an outlet to 1.7bn of recoverable reserves, the first of which were found more than a decade ago. Total, Cnooc and Tullow Oil are the main players in Uganda. Others may drill soon following a drawn-out licensing round for acreage relinquished by those three. Australia's Armour Energy was the first to sign a new exploration deal in 2017. Neighbouring Kenya lost out to Tanzania in a battle to play host to and share the Ugandan oil pipeline and must now go its own way.

Uganda leading pipeline race
white-fade.png
 
A long white elephant infested with elephantiasis !
Lol !!
 
The World Bank has poured cold water on Uganda’s infrastructure development saying it is wasted investment that is not helping the economy grow.

It warned of harder economic times unless something is done to make the country’s mega projects generate revenue from the public investments that Kampala has borrowed billions of dollars to finance.

“Why do projects suddenly appear yet they have inadequate justification? Contracting procedures based on poor feasibility studies coupled with inadequate supervision lead to large cost overruns and poor quality work. That’s not good value for taxpayer’s money and certainly not the kind of debt anyone would like their children to repay,” World Bank Uganda Country Manager Christina Malmberg Calvo said at the fourth national partnership forum last week.

The forum is a platform where all development partners and government come together to discuss and review progress in national development programmes that have been financed using loans from different creditors outside the country.

'No value for money'

Ms Calvo said the World Bank is fully aware of Uganda’s decelerated economic growth over the last couple of years and shares concerns of Ugandans because most of the infrastructure programmes government has implemented are not delivering value for money.

“Uganda is not reaping the returns on its public investment programme — you get less than one shilling for every shilling you invest. You should be getting four, five or six times your investment. What’s wrong? The public investment process is not working as it should be,” Ms Calvo said.

She also expressed concern that Uganda is headed towards a population explosion of 80 million people by 2040 yet the economy was decelerating.

The country's Prime Minister Ruhakana Rugunda, who chaired the meeting, said the forum helps both government and donors to review progress against targets and set new ones for the coming year.

The forum comprises ministries, departments and agencies’ heads and development partners.

In the 2016/17 national budget speech, Finance Minister Matia Kasaija announced that Uganda was prioritising funding to strategic infrastructure projects in the transport, energy and ICT sectors.

He reasoned that their development contributed immensely to increased productivity by facilitating connectivity and easing movement of goods.

Some of the projects include:

$220 million for the China Uganda Agricultural Industrial Park

$3,827.54 billion for nationwide transport infrastructure

$325 million for Entebbe International Airport upgrade

$3.55 billion for a pipeline and access roads to facilitate oil production

my take

Cant wait to read what the Pathetic Tanzanians will say about their Pipe Line.
hivi unajisikiaje kuwaita wenzako "pathetic"? how do you feel it as fellow human being
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Oii
Dah! Hii hatari sana, ila tuwaombee maana hili bomba walikua wamelisubiri kwa hamnu liwatoe kwenye lindi la umaskini, unajua kwa kweli haileti raha kuzungukwa na maskini, hii inatukwamisha hata sisi.

Hebu ona hii ramani hapa chini Kenya ilivyozungukwa na nchi maskini pande zote, hii sio sawa tunakwama kwa kweli, they say your neighborhood can define your destiny. Tatizo mivivu sana hawa.....

PR12040f1_en.jpg
 
Dah! Hii hatari sana, ila tuwaombee maana hili bomba walikua wamelisubiri kwa hamnu liwatoe kwenye lindi la umaskini, unajua kwa kweli haileti raha kuzungukwa na maskini, hii inatukwamisha hata sisi.

Hebu ona hii ramani hapa chini Kenya ilivyozungukwa na nchi maskini pande zote, hii sio sawa tunakwama kwa kweli, they say your neighborhood can define your destiny. Tatizo mivivu sana hawa.....

PR12040f1_en.jpg
Umesahau kwamba watoto wenu wanasurvive kwa kunywa maziwa ya mbwa

Usahau kunafamilia zinaua watoto wao ili kuwa nusuru na mateso ya njaa


Umeshau namba ya vijana waliomaliza vyuo vikuu kenya wamekosa ajira na kuamua kuwa wakora cbd

Umesahau wimbi la vijana wakiume wakenya wanavyokimbilia kuolewa marekani kwa ajiri ya kukosa ajiri
 
Umesahau kwamba watoto wenu wanasurvive kwa kunywa maziwa ya mbwa

Usahau kunafamilia zinaua watoto wao ili kuwa nusuru na mateso ya njaa


Umeshau namba ya vijana waliomaliza vyuo vikuu kenya wamekosa ajira na kuamua kuwa wakora cbd

Umesahau wimbi la vijana wakiume wakenya wanavyokimbilia kuolewa marekani kwa ajiri ya kukosa ajiri

na bado muko nyuma yetu..
 
Back
Top Bottom