UK court exposes corruption ring at Kenya poll agency

UK court exposes corruption ring at Kenya poll agency

Dr. Job

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2013
Posts
813
Reaction score
220
UK court exposes corruption ring at Kenya poll agency

polls.jpg

From left: Issack Hassan, James Oswago and Davis Chirchir. PHOTOS | FILE

By DAVID HERBLING, hdavid@ke.nationmedia.com

Posted Monday, November 17 2014 at 21:40


In Summary

  • Prosecutors say London-based printer Smith & Ouzman paid millions to IIEC officials to win printing tenders.
  • Energy secretary Davis Chirchir, who worked as a senior manager at the IIEC, tops the list of senior government officials named in the corruption racket.
  • The list includes suspended IEBC chief executive James Oswago, former Judiciary registrar Gladys Boss Shollei (deputy CEO), lawyer Kennedy Nyaundi (commissioner), Kenneth Karani (senior procurement officer) and the finance director.

Kenya's election officials pocketed millions of shillings in bribes to award lucrative printing contracts to a UK company over a two-year period, prosecution documents filed in a London court show.

In a legal battle that has left in its wake one of the best documented cases of an international corruption network in Kenya's history, the UK prosecutors have filed in court loads of written evidence implicating senior election officials in the corruption ring, including Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) chairman Issack Hassan.

Court documents show that the Kenyan taxpayer paid dearly for the illicit dealings between senior Smith & Ouzman (S&O) officials and the senior managers and commissioners in the defunct Interim Independent Electoral Commission (IIEC), putting to shame Kenyan prosecutors and the anti-corruption agency officials who have yet to nail anyone for the offences.

"The scale of the corruption alleged by the prosecution is worth £349,057.39 (Sh50 million) in Kenya," the prosecutor Mark Bryant-Heron says in court filings.

For many of the printing contracts, costs were inflated by up to 38 per cent mainly to cater for the kickbacks - commonly referred to in the mails as ‘chicken' - to senior election officials, the UK prosecutors say.


The prosecutors say "the corrupt payments were built into S&O's pricing of the printed materials so that the inflation in the price as a result of that corruption was passed onto those funding the institutions that contracted with S&O."


READ:
Smith & Ouzman called its bribes 'chicken', court told

Forensic investigations by the UK's Serious Fraud Office (SFO) show that top IIEC officials, the predecessor of IEBC, variously asked for bribes codenamed ‘chicken' to facilitate S&O's winning of seven tenders to supply election materials such as ballot papers, voter registration forms, voter ID cards and nomination forms.

Energy secretary Davis Chirchir, who worked as a senior manager at the IIEC, tops the list of senior government officials named in the corruption racket.

The list includes suspended IEBC chief executive James Oswago, former Judiciary registrar Gladys Boss Shollei (deputy CEO), lawyer Kennedy Nyaundi (commissioner), Kenneth Karani (senior procurement officer) and the finance director.

The SFO is the UK's independent agency that investigates and prosecutes serious and complex fraud cases, including bribery and corruption.

The UK managers have been charged under the European nation's Prevention of Corruption Act (1906) which prohibits use of inducements to employees of foreign governments to influence decisions and win business deals.

The prosecutor's case is that senior managers at S&O, including Christopher Smith (former chairman), his son Nick Smith (sales and marketing director), Tim Forrester (international sales manager) and Trevy James Oyombra, the Kenyan agent, made hefty payouts to Kenyan officials to influence the award of printing contracts to the UK firm.

READ:
Prosecutor, suspects spar over ‘chicken' dished out to officials

The kickbacks, amounting to Sh49.3 million at the current exchange rate, covered election materials for the 2010 Constitution referendum, four parliamentary by-elections held in Shinyalu, Bomachoge, South Mugirango and Matuga as well as a host of civic polls.

S&O is one of the oldest printing firms in the UK, specialising in security documents such as examination and ballot papers. It lists some of its top customers in Kenya as IEBC, KNEC and other government agencies.


The fresh allegations of impropriety at the Issack Hassan-led IIEC, which morphed into the IEBC in November 2011 following the enactment of a new Constitution, come in the wake of a recent wave of arrests and prosecution of senior IEBC officials over the procurement of materials for last year's election.

The fact that a number of senior officials alleged to have benefited from the corruption ring, including the chairman, transited from IIEC to IEBC, puts the integrity of IEBC to question. S&O was single-sourced by the IEBC to print ballot papers and supply other electoral materials for the March 2013 General Election.

"Corruption in the public sector hampers the efficiency of public services, undermines confidence in public institutions and increases the cost of public transactions," the SFO says in a statement.


The blow-by-blow account of the multi-million-shilling international corruption ring claims that S&O transferred the payments to Mr Oyombra, its Kenya agent, who would draw the money and distribute to senior election officials.

The funds were mostly transferred from the UK to Mr Oyombra's accounts held at
KCB for further distribution to beneficiaries.

Mr Oyombra previously worked as a procurement officer with the defunct Electoral Commission of Kenya (ECK) and therefore had access to privileged information at IIEC.

Court documents show that Mr Hassan on December 3, 2009 emailed Mr Smith inviting S&O to tender for a contract to produce 18 million voter registration cards in a deal valued at £278,838 (Sh39.4 million) but Mr Oyombra had already emailed his bosses the tender invitation two days earlier on December 1, 2009, indicating that he had the information ahead of publication of the tender.

"This tender for IIEC will be ours thanks to Dena pushing," Mr Smith said in an email after discussing the matter with his local agent, Mr Oyombra.
Dena, whose other name is not given, is described in the suit papers as an ‘individual who assisted S&O to arrange bribes for Kenyan officials.'

One other individual said to have been pivotal in the working of the bribery ring is Hamida who the UK prosecutors describe as ‘an individual connected to Oswago'.


SFO detectives retrieved a trail of damning e-mail exchanges between S&O and Kenyan election officials, shipping invoices and local purchase orders (LPOs) used by the procuring entities to build the case against the UK managers.

The documents show that Kenyan election officials in one instance inflated the price of each of the 14.51 million ballot papers ordered for the referendum in 2010 by a margin of Sh0.75, translating to £105,193.82 (Sh14.8 million) in kickbacks paid back to them through Mr Oyombra.

Mr Oswago, Mr Smith and Mr Oyombra's alleged negotiation of the bribes is captured in a series of emails exchanges and telephone conversations held in May 2010 - barely three months to the plebiscite.

"My guys are after money yes, but this should not make us not win the tender. These people are only in IIEC till the end of the year so they are after making money and they will play game with whoever puts what they want," Mr Oyombra wrote in an email to his bosses in the UK.

The cost of the bribes to Mr Oswago and the IIEC team and a further inducement of Sh0.08 per ballot paper to Mr Oyombra, inflated the original printing price of Sh2.30 for every ballot paper by 36 per cent to Sh3.13.


"The prosecution's case is that the defendants (S&O) used commission payments to these agents to mask corrupt payments to public officials who were in a position to influence the outcome of the tender for the business."

Those named as having benefited from the fresh voter registration deal ahead of the 2010 referendum include Mr Chirchir, who is said to have travelled to London to visit S&O's factory and ‘review progress' on the tender.

"Dena and Chirchir will be in London and would like to meet you on Monday," Mr Oyombra said in an email to Nicholas Smith dated February 4, 2010 adding that Mr Chirchir and fellow electoral officials "were looking for a figure of Sh10 million for emself (sic), commissioners and others."

The email correspondence reveals that S&O was to ‘take care of their travel expenses of the IIEC officials within the UK in case they need to roam around and maybe hotel.'


And in a line that suggests widespread knowledge of the corrupt payments within the IIEC, Mr Oyombra wrote to Nick Smith warning him not to pay any money directly to the visiting officials as they were accompanied by government officials who were not aware of the ring.

"If we had Shollei, CEO [Oswago], Chirchir, Nyaundi and the finance dir, proc man [Karani] they would understand as they are the ones driving this [sic] orders to us," said Mr Oyombra.

The prosecutors claim that the Kenyan officials, including Mr Chirchir and Mr Oswago, received bribes totalling £88,840 (Sh12.5 million) which was coded as ‘chicken' to be shared by the commissioners and senior IIEC officials


"I've spoken to the CEO on delivery of forms and he will get back to me tomorrow. He's so happy I've mentioned that chicken will be with me on Friday or Saturday. I hope you will be able to make the debit transactions to me today to facilitate me to have the payments done to them by Saturday latest," said Mr Oyombra in an email.

The prosecutors further allege that Mr Oswago and other IIEC officials deliberately tilted tender decisions in favour of S&O and kicked out other competitors on frivolous grounds.


"Trevy stated that Oswago told him he did not want to work with one of S&O's competitors, Lithotech. By contrast, Oswago had assured Trevy (Oyombra) that he would continue to work with S&O, who had paid him bribes in the past and would continue to pay him bribes in the future," Nicholas Smith says in an email to his father Christopher.

"He (Mr Oswago) believes in S&O and that's what is important and we've given him money for the voters' card and after payment for balance and pouches we are set to give him £21,000 Sh2,100,000. So he knows we can deliver both materially and money and I think this goodwill is important," Mr Oyombra said in an email he wrote on May, 1, 2010.


The prosecution also alleges that prices of election materials for the Matuga and South Mugirango by-elections and for various civic polls jumped 34 per cent to £69,626.04 from an initial price of £52,079.80 after factoring in the kickbacks to Kenyan election official.

The prosecutor told the London court that the kickbacks from the by-elections deal totalled £12,686.61 (Sh1.8 million).


"Following a further meeting between Oswago and Trevy (Oyombra) the value of these contracts rose again. This was done, the prosecution suggests, to enable the payment of bribes to officials whilst maintaining some profit for S&O."


UK court exposes corruption ring at Kenya poll agency - Politics and policy - businessdailyafrica.com
 
IEBC must go for their gross imcompetence and corrupt ways. NKT!!!
 
A British company met the travel and hotel accommodation costs for top electoral commission officials, who travelled to the United Kingdom as it sought to influence them into awarding it tenders for printing election material used in the 2010 referendum, prosecution documents filed in a London court have revealed.

UK prosecutors have said that the firm, Smith & Ouzman, paid for the four-day tour by the Interim Independent Electoral Commission (IIEC) chairman Issack Hassan, Chief Executive Officer James Oswago, head of legal services Praxedes Tororey, commissioner Ken Nyaundi and one other person only identified as Sang to the UK including booking their hotel accommodation barely a month before the referendum.

Hotel costs amounting to Sh421,400 were later deducted from “the bribes eventually paid out to the officials”, the prosecutor said in their filing.

“The election bosses were in the UK to assess the firm’s capacity to print election materials,” according to the documents.

Smith & Ouzman is accused of paying a series of bribes, disguised as commissions, to the election officials.

The payments were made through the company’s agent in Nairobi, identified in the court documents as Trevy James Oyombra.

In email communications between Mr Oyombra and Smith &Ouzman bosses in London, the commission is variously referred to as “chicken” or “comm” or “comm+O” to indicate the official to whom the “commission was paid”.

Allegations relate to 2009 and 2010 and show how the “commissions”, on average 30 per cent of the contract sum, inflated the cost of elections.

The company and its top managers have also been accused of bribing officials of public institutions in three other African countries besides Kenya.

According to the documents, the senior managers also influenced public officials in Ghana, Mauritania and Somalia, paying them millions of shillings to win tenders for printing materials.

Through their action, the documents say, the managers and the company skewed the award of competitive tenders in their favour.

A BIG JOKE

The documents show tendering at the IIEC was a big joke, the process was so cooked up that Smith & Ouzman were given the competing bids and told in advance what excuses would be used to disqualify them.

The court filings say that the company paid out up to Sh50 million to top election officials to win tenders for the supply of election material in four by-elections — Shinyalu, South Mugirango, Bomachoge and Matuga — and the 2010 referendum.

Other major players in the shocking corruption ring include Mr Davis Chirchir who at the time was a senior manager at the IIEC, the commission’s former deputy CEO, Mrs Gladys Boss Shollei and a senior procurement officer at the elections body, Mr Kenneth Karani.

Forensic investigations by UK’s Serious Fraud Office (SFO) reveal that in total, S&O received 10 payments worth Sh192 million from IIEC between September 2009 and December 2010.

“From that sum S&O retained £980,834. £380,859 was paid to Trevy’s bank account,” the filings show.

Of that sum, the prosecution said that it was agreed between the defendants and Mr Oyombra that £337,993 was to be paid out as bribes to the IIEC officials to secure future contracts.

'WAITING TO BE SERVED'

The filings say: “On 18th August, 28th September, and 8th December 2010, S&O received payments for this contract (the exhibit number is given). The receipt of the first payment prompted an email enquiry on 24/8/10 from Trevy to Nicholas Smith (the exhibit number is given): “'let me know once you send the commission for the referendum. These guys are already on the table waiting to be served'.”

In interviews with the prosecution, Mr Nicholas Smith said he did not know what Trevy was referring to when he said “these guys are already on the table waiting to be served”.

He denied that it was a reference to onward payment to officials.

The documents also detail how tender documents for the various by-elections were speeded up by IIEC officials and sent to the British firm to facilitate the quick release of kickbacks.

“On the 16th June 2009, Nicholas Smith wrote to the IIEC chairman, Ahmed Issack Hassan. The letter referred to a meeting between S&O and Hassan at IIEC’s offices in Nairobi and quotes for printing voter registration forms, voter ID cards and ballot papers for the urgent Shinyalu and Bomachoge by-election.

“The price quoted was £32,526. The 200,000 voter ID cards and 20,000 voter registration forms were quickly produced by S&O and delivered on 27/6/09,” the documents show.

“There remained the ballot papers to produce and ship. The S&O invoice makes clear that they were delivered on 18/8/09.”

Between the first and second shipments email discussions had taken place between Mr Nicholas Smith and Mr Oyombra about payment of commission to Trevy “and the necessity to pay the senior procurement officer at the IIEC, Kenneth Karani and other officials.”

source:Poll officials on the spot in UK graft case - Politics - nation.co.ke
 
Hamna jipya hapa, haya hutendeka tu kila sehemu na nchi. Corporates around the world huwa na budget ya kuhonga.

By the way even Bongo has been caught in the same pool. I personally represented a company to bid for the BVR tender in Tz and we all know how it all ended.


By Katare Mbashiru,The Citizen Reporter

Posted Tuesday, July 8 2014 at 07:50

August 26, 2013: Tender is awarded at the cost of $78million
October 22, 2013: Two firms contest the award at PPAA
November 29, 2013: PPAA nullifies the $78million tender
January 16, 2014: Six international bidders re-invited for bidding
February 5, 2014: South African firm wins the tender at $117 million
In March, 2013, the South African firm has tendered at $84 million.
March 24, 2014: One firm that lost lodges an appeal at PPAA

May 5, 2014: PPAA dismisses the appeal, orders each party to bear their cost

The Public Procurement Appeals Authority nullified an initial tender in November 2013 on the grounds that the process was marred by serious irregularities, but in a dramatic turn of events, NEC raised the cost from $78.9m to $117.18bn

Dar es Salaam. The National Electoral Commission (NEC) raised the cost of procuring Biometric Voter Registration (BVR) kits, initially set at $78 million (Sh131 billion), to a whopping $117 million (Sh196.5 billion), The Citizen can reveal today.

Earlier, the tender was awarded to a consortium comprising M/s SCI Tanzania, Invu IT Solutions and Jazz Matrix Corporation on August 26, 2013, according to documents seen by this newspaper.

However, the Public Procurement Appeals Authority (PPAA) nullified the tender in November 2013 after it was established that the process was marred by serious irregularities. But in a dramatic turn of events following the PPAA decision, NEC raised the cost from $78.9 million to $117.18 million on February 5, this year, a difference of $39 million (Sh65 billion), according to various tender details obtained by The Citizen.

The company that won the tender in February had earlier submitted a bid to supply the BVR kits for $84 million (Sh141 billion). NEC has not explained the increase despite several requests by The Citizen.

Earlier tender nullified

Following the nullification of the earlier tender by PPAA, NEC decided to go for single source procurement whereby the commission picked a company it had earlier disqualified, LithoTech Exports of South Africa.

It was at this juncture that the tender cost was raised by a whopping $33 million. According to records, the firm had offered to supply BVR kits for $84 million.

LithoTech Exports was given the job for $33 million (Sh52.8 billion) above what it had indicated in the tender that was nullified by PPAA.

New award challenged

Investigations by The Citizen have established that LithoTech Exports was among the six companies that originally bid for the tender but was disqualified in the preliminary stage.

Efforts to obtain an explanation from NEC officials have proved futile. The commission's chairman, Mr Justice (rtd) Damian Lubuva, told The Citizen on Sunday that NEC would address the tender queries at a press conference on Thursday.

Last Thursday, NEC Director of Elections Julius Malaba refused to comment and accusedThe Citizen of undermining the commission.

"Your paper has been reporting issues about NEC and Nida. I don't want to be involved in a war of words between the two government entities, although a lot of the information about the BVR project is misleading,'' Mr Malaba said in his office. He was referring to a previous report by this paper showing how NEC had differed with the National Identification Agency (Nida) over the multimillion-dollar tender to register voters.

The Citizen revealed how the two agencies had clashed, with Nida officials reportedly being unhappy that its own ID project had been overlooked.

In its submission to PPAA in defence of the single-source procurement, NEC argued it had considered time and the urgency for voter registration ahead of the 2015 General Election.

The appeal challenging the emergency procurement and the award to the South African company was lodged in March this year, again by Safran Morpho. The matter was thrown out in May on a technicality.

Official documents from PPAA seen by The Citizen show that in August 2013, NEC awarded M/s SCI Tanzania, Invu IT Solutions and Jazz Matrix Corporation the tender to supply the kits for $78.9 million.

However, the award was contested at the PPAA by two unsuccessful bidders – Safran Morpho of France ($61 million) and Iris Corporation from Malaysia ($94.9 million).

After oral and written submissions from the parties, PPAA ruled in favour of the aggrieved companies that the procurement law had been violated and directed NEC to float the tender afresh.

In its ruling dated November 29, 2013, PPAA among other queries, it wondered how the joint venture with a turnover of less than $20 million was considered for the job. It also voiced doubt about the company's competence and apparent insider dealing.

"There was no pre-qualification done to determine the experience, financial, technical, production and managerial capability of the tenderer with the lowest evaluated price. However, curiously and strangely, this fundamental requirement was not conducted. What was done was a demonstration by the successful tender of the product before the respondent's staff (NEC) followed by a physical visit to the Malawi Electoral Commission," reads the ruling in part.

It was reported that there was a covert struggle between Nida and NEC for control of tens of billions of shillings for the registration of Tanzanian citizens and eligible voters countrywide.

Mr Lubuva then accused Nida of sour grapes. He told The Citizen that Nida officials were unhappy after the rejection of Iris Corporation, currently helping to roll out the countrywide ID registration. The firm is expected to issue 25 million IDs to qualifying Tanzanians through the smartcard technology.

Nida has argued that the move would have saved the country huge sums of money. Mr Maimu also argued there had been an agreement within government that Nida play the role of registering Tanzanians in readiness for next year's General Election.

Nida Director General Dickson Maimu then accused Justice Lubuva of dishonesty in his accusation. He, in turn, accused NEC of skirting around questions why it resorted to single sourcing even after a ruling by the PPAA for competitive tendering.

According to Mr Maimu, Nida's only interest was in following up what they believed to be an open and logical case to have Iris Corporation considered if the NEC tender was to be decided through single sourcing.

The Malaysian firm, he added, had already been tested and had the technical, financial and managerial qualifications.

https://www.jamiiforums.com/jukwaa-la-siasa/686385-how-voter-kit-tender-was-inflated-by-sh65bn.html
 
Hamna jipya hapa, haya hutendeka tu kila sehemu na nchi. Corporates around the world huwa na budget ya kuhonga.

By the way even Bongo has been caught in the same pool. I personally represented a company to bid for the BVR tender in Tz and we all know how it all ended.

duh, lawmaina kumbe wewe ni mdosi kihivyo?
 
Hahaha!! kwani ku-bid for tender na udosi wapi na wapi.

kumbe u-representative wenyewe ulimaanisha kubeba bahasha za bosi, hahahaha. Mi nilijua ulikua part of ka-team fulani hivi ....my mistake...
 
kumbe u-representative wenyewe ulimaanisha kubeba bahasha za bosi, hahahaha. Mi nilijua ulikua part of ka-team fulani hivi ....my mistake...

Kwani mubeba bahasha sio part of the team? learn to work as a team hata mfagiaji ofisi wote wanahusika kiaina. Ila hili la kung'eng'ania tender kubwa kama hizi wabeba bahasha hawaruhusiwi kufikia mahali nilikofikia. Pale panataka uzoefu wa kufanya
- Product demo
- Kujua nani ndio nani kwenye msururu wote wa "wakubwa" maana kila mtu anababaisha kuwa yeye ndiye
- Kuhusika katika uandishi wa financial na technical proposals
- Kutafuta intelligence washindani wako wamecheza game ipi ili na wewe uwashtukie

Yaani hayo tu baadhi, sijataja mengi sana. Inashangaza huyajui haya ama unajifanya kushangaa, ndio Afrika yetu hii.
 
Kwani mubeba bahasha sio part of the team? learn to work as a team hata mfagiaji ofisi wote wanahusika kiaina. Ila hili la kung'eng'ania tender kubwa kama hizi wabeba bahasha hawaruhusiwi kufikia mahali nilikofikia. Pale panataka uzoefu wa kufanya
- Product demo
- Kujua nani ndio nani kwenye msururu wote wa "wakubwa" maana kila mtu anababaisha kuwa yeye ndiye
- Kuhusika katika uandishi wa financial na technical proposals
- Kutafuta intelligence washindani wako wamecheza game ipi ili na wewe uwashtukie

Yaani hayo tu baadhi, sijataja mengi sana. Inashangaza huyajui haya ama unajifanya kushangaa, ndio Afrika yetu hii.

hahahaha. umenifurahisha ulivyojitambulisha kwa mkwara mzito: "I personally represented a company to bid for the BVR tender in Tz ..." mi nikajua we mdosi bwana... hizo swaga zako inaelekea totoz wajinga wajinga unakula sana wewe
 
hahahaha. umenifurahisha ulivyojitambulisha kwa mkwara mzito: "I personally represented a company to bid for the BVR tender in Tz ..." mi nikajua we mdosi bwana... hizo swaga zako inaelekea totoz wajinga wajinga unakula sana wewe

Hahaha!! kumbe unababaishwa virahisi hivyo, yaani a representative of a bidding company inakua tisho kwako. Hamna cha ajabu hapo, haya ni mambo huwa yanafanywa na wana-EAC, most of the time we represent foreign companies to bid for tenders in joint ventures.
 
Total silence on KNEC? But anyway what political undertones will be got by exposing KNEC?

This is matters political I believe....and why the silence on this corruption...it's a vice that we all have to fight.
 
New revelations as IEBC chicken scam agent's bank accounts are frozen

IC.jpg


Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) offices at Integrity Centre in Nairobi. The corruption watchdog sought and got court orders to interrogate Trevy Oyombra's accounts. PHOTO | FILE


By BRIAN WASUNA, bwasuna@ke.nationmedia.com

Posted Monday, December 8 2014 at 00:00


In Summary

  • Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) investigators say that some Sh20.5 million was transferred to Mr Oyombra's account on May 23 last year.
  • Ignatius Wekesa, a forensic investigator at the EACC, says there is reason to believe that part of the deposit was intended to be paid to election officials in return for a tender he secured for Smith & Ouzman in the run-up to the March 2013 General Election.

Trevy James Oyombra, the man at the centre of a corruption scam involving British security printing firm Smith & Ouzman, may have bribed Kenyan election officials as late as last year, the Business Daily can now reveal.

Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) investigators seeking court orders to interrogate Mr Oyombra's accounts in a local bank say in their application that some Sh20.5 million was transferred to Mr Oyombra's account on May 23 last year.

Ignatius Wekesa, a forensic investigator at the EACC, says there is reason to believe that part of the deposit was intended to be paid to election officials in return for a tender he secured for Smith & Ouzman in the run-up to the March 2013 General Election.

The corruption watchdog told the court in its November 3, 2014 application that initial investigations had indicated Mr Oyombra's accounts at Oriental Commercial Bank (OCB) were used as a conveyor belt for the transfer of bribes, codenamed ‘chicken', from Smith & Ouzman to election officials.


"It has emerged that Mr Oyombra, jointly with others, benefitted from money remitted from the foreign company into these particular accounts," says Mr Wekesa, adding that some of the money may have been paid to election officials as recently as last year.


"In view of the above facts, it is imperative that certain documents; being bank statements, account opening documents, banker books, mandate cards, swift transfer and any other documents that would enhance this investigation; be availed to us for investigation," he said.


The court subsequently ordered that the bank provides the EACC with documents connected to Mr Oyombra's account number 0070000862 in OCB's Westlands branch.


The latest revelations about Mr Oyombra emerged from Nairobi's Milimani Commercial Courts where the businessman has sued OCB, seeking to discharge his bank accounts from the freeze.


Mr Oyombra wants the freeze – imposed after the EACC sought and got court orders to interrogate his accounts – lifted on grounds that the directive only required the bank to co-operate with the investigators and not to freeze the accounts.

Oriental froze Mr Oyombra's three bank accounts after it was served with an order from Nairobi's Kibera Law Courts directing it to co-operate with the investigators.


READ: How UK sleuths unearthed Kenya ‘Chickengate' scandal

PIC Centre, a firm owned by Mr Oyombra, is enjoined in the suit as the owner of two of the three frozen accounts.


Mr Oyombra says in court papers that he got to know of the bank's decision to freeze his accounts on November 16, 2014 when he tried to withdraw money for an ongoing project in Kisumu.


"I was informed by the manager that OCB had frozen the accounts pursuant to a court order served upon them by EACC officers. I obtained a copy of the order only to realise that the warrant only authorised investigation. Nowhere did the court order any freezing of my accounts," he says. Oriental is yet to respond to the petition Mr Oyombra filed last Friday.


Lady Justice Farah Amin directed Mr Oyombra to serve the bank with the suit papers so as to allow them time to respond.

The anti-corruption watchdog moved after the local media published stories on the trial in the UK of two senior Smith & Ouzman executives over charges of corruption committed in four African countries.

READ:
Smith & Ouzman called its bribes ‘chicken', court told

Detailed revelations of how the international bribery syndicate worked put the EACC and the Director of Public Prosecutions Keriako Tobiko under pressure to act on Kenyan conspirators.

Mr Oyombra has faulted Oriental for allegedly acting in excess of the court order by freezing PIC Centre's accounts. The businessman argues that even if such an order were issued to freeze accounts, it could only apply to his personal accounts and not the company's.


"Even if the order was for freezing my account, the same could not be extended to PIC Centre merely because I happen to be a director therein," Mr Oyombra argues.


PIC Centre, a news agency, has two accounts with the bank, one dollar and one shilling denominated account.


Mr Oyombra claims that the firm is currently unable to pay its employees' salaries and insurance premiums, a situation that has left the business in a vulnerable state.


Some of the workers have allegedly threatened to take legal action against the company over the unpaid salaries if it goes against their contracts.

The bank has allegedly imposed penalties to the frozen accounts for a number of cheques that have bounced following the freeze.

Mr Oyombra has attached the EACC application for the warrant and the orders issued by the Kibera court as proof that the bank has acted maliciously in freezing his accounts.

Mr Oyombra reckons that a meeting with some of the bank's employees revealed that the freeze was a result of the negative publicity the lender feared it would face as a result of the investigations.

Mr Oyombra further claims that he was denied a meeting with the bank's manager after he obtained a copy of the court orders, forcing him to immediately instruct his lawyer to seek legal redress.


Samuel Omondi, the lawyer representing Mr Oyombra in the case, says he secured a meeting with four Oriental employees, who informed him that the bank's management made the decision to freeze the accounts over fears that the institution's name would be tarnished by the investigations.

"The staff confirmed that the accounts were frozen courtesy of instructions from Oriental's board of directors purportedly on account of the fact that I had been adversely mentioned in the media as having been involved in bribery of IIEC [Interim Independent Electoral Commission] officials and that the same reflects negatively on the bank."


Mr Oyombra says he uses one of the account to cater for his family and to run his businesses and that all his affairs have been crippled by the lack of access to his account. He is yet to insure his two daughters, and that the pending premiums amount to Sh638,000.

Mr Oyombra further claims that he owes a contractor running his Kisumu construction project a quarterly fee of Sh10.5 million and that failure to pay may stall the project at a critical stage and occasion him heavy losses.


Mr Oyombra, a former Electoral Commission of Kenya (ECK) official, is accused in the ongoing corruption case in a UK court of acting as the conduit through which Smith & Ouzman funnelled bribes to senior election and Kenya National Examination Council officials.

The bribes were allegedly paid to win multi-million-shilling security printing contracts – some of which were single sourced.

New revelations as IEBC chicken scam agent’s bank accounts are frozen - Politics and policy - businessdailyafrica.com
 
Back
Top Bottom