US restates stance on Uhuru and Ruto

US restates stance on Uhuru and Ruto

Geza Ulole

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Posts
65,136
Reaction score
91,917
US restates stance on Uhuru and Ruto

splash+px.jpg




By NATION TEAM newsdesk@ke.nationmedia.com
Posted Thursday, February 7 2013 at 22:30

In Summary


  • Clarification by top diplomat comes after Hague-bound pair welcomed President Obama's statement


The top US diplomat for African Affairs on Thursday sent a veiled message that the election of the Jubilee flag bearer as president could be received negatively by the United States.

However, US Assistant Secretary of State Johnnie Carson did not specifically say that the US-Kenya relations would suffer if the Jubilee team won the presidential election.

He also refrained from mentioning the two leaders who are facing charges of crimes against humanity at The Hague.

Mr Carson's caution came just two days after a video statement on Kenya by President Barack Obama was welcomed by the Jubilee presidential candidate Uhuru Kenyatta and running mate William Ruto as an indication that the US government had no objections to their taking power.

The clarification comes as Tanzania declared it was ready to host the International Criminal Court trials of the two Jubilee leaders and former Head of Civil Service Francis Muthaura and journalist Joshua arap Sang.

During a tele-conference with reporters, Mr Carson said: "We believe individuals accused of crimes against humanity should go before the courts to prove their innocence or suffer the consequences of the judgements if they are found guilty," he stated.

Even though the US is not a member of The Hague based court, he declared that they support its mission on crimes against humanity.

"The US is not a signatory to the Rome statute, but we recognise what the ICC is doing and we support it," he said.

The statement by Mr Carson, a former US ambassador to Kenya, follows President Obama's declaration that Washington was not supporting any candidate and would respect the verdict of Kenyans in next month's elections.

Mr Kenyatta and Mr Ruto had rushed to laud the US position, which their camp interpreted as backtracking on a presumed threat to impose sanctions if the two were elected.

However, the veteran diplomat warned five times in response to questions referring to Mr Kenyatta that "choices have consequences". He declined to elaborate.

Mr Carson suggested that the choices Kenyans make in the election will have repercussions internationally.

Asked about US attitudes toward Mr Kenyatta specifically, he said his country would not compel Kenyans to elect certain candidates in office.

He added: "Individuals have histories, individuals have images, and individuals have reputations. When they are selected to lead their nations, those images, histories and reputations go along with them."

Mr Carson was also asked whether the US might adopt an arm's-length posture toward a Kenya led by Mr Kenyatta as it has done in the case of Sudan, which is led by an ICC indictee, Omar Bashir.

He acknowledged that the US has a policy of not engaging with President Bashir and other Sudanese who have been charged but not yet tried by the ICC, but argued that sanctions against Sudan are a result of the country's mishandling of the situation in Darfur.

Mr Carson drew a distinction between Sudan and Kenya, saying, "I don't want to make a comparison with Sudan in its totality because Sudan is a special case in many ways."

He noted that the US has "rigid and tough sanctions" in place against Sudan due to its government's actions in the Darfur region.

Sudan is also on the US list of countries that support international terrorism, Ambassador Carson said.

"None of that applies to Kenya," he emphasised.

He sought throughout his 30-minute conference call from Washington to reinforce President Obama's comments in a videotaped message on Wednesday to the effect that the US does not favour any candidate in Kenya's elections.

But he added that Kenya's position in the Horn of Africa makes it vital for the US to emphasize on the need to have peaceful elections.

In addition, the envoy told reporters his country had already pumped into Kenya's electoral system about $35 million (about Sh3 billion) since 2010 to help prepare the electoral systems for the elections and its aftermath.

In that respect, he demanded that all presidential candidates in Kenya should sign a petition in public to renounce violence.

The US is keen to see Kenya's elections done in peace because the country is a key ally in the region. The US has the largest diplomatic establishment on the African continent in Nairobi.

In Tanzania, Attorney-General Frederick Werema said they "would be honoured" to host the trials at the Arusha-based International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, whose mandate will end soon.

"It will be a great honour for Tanzania to handle the cases. In fact if I received the request from The Hague today I will expedite it and convince all my colleagues involved in the government to accept the request," he said in the Tanzanian town of Dodoma.

A member of the Rwanda tribunal in Arusha has said they are ready to handle the cases of the four Kenyans, but the UN and the Tanzanian government must give a go ahead.

Mr Danford Mpumilwa, the public relations officer, said the cases could be prosecuted by the tribunal because it is well equipped.

But Mr Werema said the Tanzanian government was yet to receive any requests either from the suspects or from The Hague to have the cases transferred to Arusha.

"The Hague, and not the suspects, must initiate the process."

Mr Kenyatta and Mr Ruto's defence teams have asked the ICC to transfer the cases to the Arusha-based court to reduce costs and stop disrupting their families.

ICC presiding judge Sang-Hyun Song has instructed all parties to the two cases to make their submissions regarding the applications before he makes a ruling.

Reports by Kevin J Kelley, Aggrey Mutambo and The Citizen writers

US restates stance on Uhuru and Ruto - CAMPAIGN NEWS - elections.nation.co.ke





US warns over choice of President


Updated 4 hrs 54 mins ago

By Moses Njagih


KENYA: The US government has issued stern and direct warning to Kenyans that the choice of person elected president at the March 4 General Election will come with consequences.

In what appeared a laced message to Kenyans about the eight presidential candidates offering themselves to succeed President Kibaki, the US Assistant secretary of State for Africa Affairs Johnnie Carson warned Kenyans to make sure they break with the past.

Carson who is a former US ambassador to Kenya said in a telephone conference with journalists on the upcoming elections that good choices must be made.

Said he: "Kenyans must know that individuals have reputation and images built through their history and must be careful against making choices that might impact negatively on the economy of the nation and the region."

His message comes just hours after US President Barack Obama said the US has no preferred candidate in Kenya's presidential race.

Carson however declined to comment if the Obama Administration would impose sanctions on Kenyans if they elected International Criminal Court indictees Uhuru Kenyatta and his running mate William Ruto arguing it would preemptive and hypothetical.


Standard Digital News - Kenya : US warns over choice of president
 
France to have only 'essential contact' with Jubilee leaders

poncs.jpg


By KNA
Posted Friday, February 8 2013 at 17:30


France has said it supports the International Criminal Court (ICC) process in Kenya and will only have 'essential contact' with Uhuru Kenyatta if he is elected president.

France ambassador to Kenya Etienne de Poncins, however, maintained that Kenyans have a right to elect leaders of their own choice in the March 4 General Election.

"Our position is that we only have essential contact with somebody who is indicted by the ICC; it is a well-known position, same as that of the British," the envoy said in Kisumu during the launch of the 2013 edition of the annual French Film Festival at the newly-opened Alliance Francais offices in Milimani estate.

Mr Poncins said Paris will act according to the dictates of the Rome Statute because it is a signatory.

"We are supportive of the ICC and are members of the Rome Statute. Our policy is to limit contact only to the essentials. There is no surprise in that; it is a long-standing position," Mr Poncins said.

Already, the US and Britain have made their positions known on the issue, which has captured Kenyans imagination following a televised video message by US President Barack Obama on the Kenyan elections.

The latest move comes hours after the
government said it will seek clarification from the US on its position post-March 4.

Mr Kenyatta, who is seeking the presidency on a Jubilee Alliance ticket and his running mate William Ruto are facing charges of crimes against humanity at the ICC.

The charges stem from the 2007/2008 post election violence in which 1,133 people were killed and 650,000 displaced from their homes.

Mr Kenyatta, Mr Ruto, former head of civil service Francis Muthaura and former radio presenter Joshua arap Sang are accused of bearing the greatest responsibility for the violence that followed a disputed presidential election.

The ICC trials are set to begin in April 10.


France to have only 'essential contact' with Jubilee leaders - CAMPAIGN NEWS - elections.nation.co.ke


 
France warns on electing leaders with pending cases

Updated 1 hrs 12 mins ago

Rushdie Oudia

KENYA: The French Government has added its voice on European Union countries warning of stern consequences in electing leaders with pending cases at the International Criminal Court.

French ambassador to Kenya, Etienne De Poncins said his government stands by the decision made by European Union countries but his country will be rooting for free, fair and peaceful General Elections.

De Poncins said the French government has no preferred presidential candidate but consequences will be there on the relations with Kenya on the final choice of leaders if they are questionable.

"France will stick to the EU stand to respect the ICC, and the member countries in relation to ICC suspects," said De Poncins.
Jubille alliance presidential candidate Uhuru Kenyatta and his deputy William Ruto are facing crime against humanity charges at the court based at The Hague.

The French Ambassador said that they are impartial and will not decide for Kenyans who to vote for come March 4.
He said that his government will not interfere in any away as Kenyans elect their leaders but was closely monitoring the situation on the ground.

The ambassador urged Kenyans to cooperate with the ICC as it was the best solution to get justice for whatever happened during the 2007-2008 post election violence.

De Poncins spoke during opening of the new Milimani Branch of Alliance Francaise de Kisumu which is a boost to those interested in studying French and also inculcating the French culture in Kisumu.

The French government's stand comes as the third foreign voice after United Kingdom and The United States of America said it won't be business as usual if Kenyans have a president who is facing crime against humanity charges.

Johny Carson who is a former US ambassador to Kenya said on the upcoming elections that good choices must be made.
He said that Kenyans must know that individuals have reputation and images built through their history and must be careful against making choices that might impact negatively on the economy of the nation and the region.

Standard Digital News - Kenya : France warns on electing leaders with pending cases
 
SWITZERLAND JOINS US, UK and France in warning of consequences if persons indicted by ICC are elected; full cooperation with the court paramount.

http://www.facebook.com/NTVKenya

More embassies join push against Hague suspects

experts+pics.jpg




By ISAAC ONGIRI iongiri@ke.nationmedia.com
Posted Saturday, February 9 2013 at 00:30

In Summary

  • More EU countries threaten sanctions over Ruto, Uhuru win
  • France, Switzerland, UK and the US to deal sparingly with Uhuru and Ruto if they win

Foreign relations experts on Friday warned Kenya faces far-reaching economic sanctions if the Jubilee Coalition wins the coming polls.

The warning comes in the wake of a growing list of Western countries uncomfortable with the candidature of Jubilee Coalition leaders who are facing charges at the ICC grew.

France on Friday joined the US and Britain in the debate on the likely outcome of the elections when its envoy said Paris backed the European Union stand on the consequences of the Jubilee Coalition forming the next government.

Head of Civil Service Francis Kimemia, however, said Kenya would seek clarification from the US on the "contradictions" regarding future engagements.

On Friday, head of University of Nairobi's Institute of Diplomacy and International Studies Maria Nzomo described recent diplomatic statements on the coming elections as thinly-veiled threats to pass a message to Kenyans against electing leaders the US foreign policy may not favour.

She said the clarification by Assistant Secretary of State Johnie Carson on an earlier "friendly" statement by President Obama might have been sanctioned by the State Department due to a misinterpretation of the message on the Kenyan elections.

"Obama was talking as the President and his speeches are regulated by certain restrictions. Mr Carson doesn't have these restrictions. It is diplomatically clear that the US realised there was a need to clarify the President's message," said Prof Nzomo.

President Obama had on Wednesday made a general statement that his government would not endorse any candidate in the presidential race and called for peaceful elections.

Prof Nzomo said minimum sanctions ranging from travel bans to serious economic restrictions by the US government might be slapped on Kenya because of its strict foreign policy that does not tolerate engagement with individuals facing crimes such as those faced by the Jubilee leaders Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto.

"They may do to us what they are doing to the Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir and Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe. This may also influence action by their allies such as Britain, France and Germany among others," she said.

Prof Nzomo, a career diplomat, warned that President Obama's government may also resort to cooling off its diplomatic relations with Kenya by applying "snubbing tactics" as a stepping stone to much more severe sanctions if elections failed to capture the anticipated international expectations.

She, however, noted that many voters might not pay attention to the diplomacy debate.

Prof Philip Nyinguro, an international relations lecturer at the University of Nairobi, described as misleading the perception that Mr Carson's statement might have contradicted President Obama's position.

"The US government works in synergy and to imagine that a statement of the world's most powerful President can be clarified or contradicted is a mistake," Prof Nyinguro said.

He, however, said the rush to make statements on the Kenyan electoral situation by world powers might have precipitated by genuine fears that an Uhuru-Ruto win in the coming elections was becoming a reality.

"These statements may be coming now because of some information probably available within the State Department warning of a possible Uhuru Kenyatta win and they may be aimed at stopping such a possibility," he said.

Political scientist Joshua Kivuva said Kenyans should expect more diplomatic warnings.

"A county headed by suspects is very different from a country headed by Nelson Mandela," he said.

Speaking in Kisumu, French ambassador to Kenya Etienne de Poncins said: "Our position is that we only have essential contact with somebody who is indicted by the ICC; it is a well-known position, same as that of the British."

While stating that Kenyans had the right to choose their leaders, Mr Poncins maintained that France would adhere to the Rome Statute.

"Our policy is to limit contact only to the essentials," he said.

http://elections.nation.co.ke/news/...poll/-/1631868/1688868/-/70jqp9z/-/index.html
 
Why many Kenyans in the Diaspora are convinced that CORD under PM Odinga is Kenya's best bet in the coming Elections

By In2EastAfrica Reporter


Summary by Leonard Mwamba, Berlin: 8th Feb., 2013.

Having interacted with several Kenyans in the Diaspora and listened to various concerns and viewpoints, I hereby share with Kenyan voters the considered opinion of many Kenyans currently away from their homeland.

Kenyans in the Diaspora maintain a keen interest in the country's development and contribute to the same through remittances as well as expertise. They desire that all Kenyans may enjoy human dignity befitting the 21st Century (among other things, proper security, no hunger, modern health care, fair income earning opportunities, justice) and respect among nations. Leading political groupings have recently unveiled their manifestoes and Kenyans owe it to themselves to interrogate the groupings (CORD, Jubilee, Amani, Eagle, NARC etc.) and elect the most credible and effective group.

However, in an economy where institutional reforms are yet to yield results, manifestos are only as good as the commitment of the people behind them. This is an important factor in deciding which group should lead us. Another important factor to keep in mind is that we are not an island unto ourselves but a nation among many in an increasingly globalised world.

With the benefit of a keen look at the available manifestoes and a comparison with how successful nations do their politics, many in the Diaspora recommend the Cord grouping under the leadership of Rt. Hon. Raila A. Odinga as the optimal choice in the 2013 national elections. As already mentioned, a manifesto is only as credible as the commitment of the leader(s) behind it in cases where institutions are not yet strong enough. Here are some facts about Raila due to which the aspirant deserves credit:

a) Raila combined efforts with like-minded leaders and engaged in an un-relenting fight for constitutional and institutional reforms with the key milestone being the adoption of the new constitution in 2010. In face of the numerous inequities and inequalities in Kenya, keen observers would agree that Raila has been consistent in supporting the principle of power and resources devolution.

b) At a personal level, he advocated for the payment of taxes by MPs and he personally paid his own share in 2011, a move that generated talks of censure motions against him by some MPs who were keen to avoid paying taxes.

c) He has a demonstrated a steady interest in, and commitment to constitutionalism, rule of law and good governance. He showed the way as a co-principal tasked with coordination by:
i) Mainstreaming the signing and reviewing of performance contracts for top civil servants,
ii) Sacking ministers named in scandals such as Prof. Sam Ongeri (stolen Free Primary Education funds which the Kenya government was recently reported to have paid back to the UK) as well as his own party minister (at the time) Mr. William S. Ruto (maize scandal) so as to clear way for efficient investigations. Most of us know that Raila's co-principal, President Mwai Kibaki declined to sanction the sackings thereby weakening Raila's efforts, and
iii) Internationally, Raila was the first African leader to question President Robert Mugabe's contested re-election in Zimbabwe and as an AU Mediator in Ivory Coast, Raila defended due process.


d) He has demonstrated commitment to environmental protection. Even if some of his opponents might have felt that they had given him a poisoned chalice when the Mau Restoration project was placed under his watch, Raila showed his readiness to make hard decisions by soldiering on with the restoration work despite misinformation and derailment by some politicians from the area. Besides dishonest local politicians, the treasury earned a great proportion of blame for the slowness of the whole process and the delayed compensation for genuine victims since inadequate funds were allocated/released. In the ethicized political environment that characterizes Kenyan politics, this situation might have affected his popularity but leaders must make tough decisions. NB: In 2008, a survey by a US pollster, Gallup, showed that an overwhelming 85 per cent of those polled approved of Raila's leadership compared to 63 per cent - or six in every 10 Kenyans - for President Kibaki, according to the poll on The Grand Coalition Government.

e) His famous ‘Kibaki Tosha' proclamation in the run-up to the 2002 elections demonstrated that he supports others in cases where the common good demands so. In the aftermath of the famous proclamation, voters in the Mt. Kenya region referred to him as ‘Mutongoria Njamba'. Unfortunately, Kibaki broke a pre election gentleman's agreement to grant him the position of Prime Minister and other promises. For the sake of fairness, Raila should not only be seen to be good when he is giving support but also when he is asking for support. In 2007, Rift Valley voters who referred to Raila as ‘arap Mibey' demonstrated that a good leader can be voted in even if he or she is not from one's own community.

f) Whereas most Kenyan MPs have not been principled/courageous enough to resign and seek reelection when they differ with their sponsoring parties, Raila Odinga demonstrated courage and principle when he resigned from FORD-K and successfully defended his Lang'ata seat in a by-election.

g) With others, he engaged in a spirited and successful fight for the second liberation leading to the repeal of the law banning alternative political parties on December 10, 1991.



Sometimes it helps to know what other leaders think of an aspirant. In Raila's case we know that the following personalities support his presidential bid and/or hold him in high regard (just to mention a few):
1. Mr. S. K. Macharia (businessman and boss of the Royal Media Services).

2. Dr. Joe Barage Wanjui (UoN Chancellor, businessman and President Mwai Kibaki's friend).

3.
Mr. Joe Khamisi (a fairly genuine politician from the Coast with good records in CDF administration). Mr. Khamisi described Raila as "an intelligent, charismatic and a great leader who means well for the country".

4.
Mr. Peter Kuguru (businessman) who says the following, "…… in light of how Mr. Odinga has carried himself since a Grand Coalition government was stitched together in early 2008, I and the gikuyu4raila.com group believe he stands heads and shoulders above the rest in the race for State House.".

5.
Mr. Gitobu Imanyara (second liberation politician who struggled alongside Raila) says, "My support for Raila is founded on the firm belief that he is the only candidate with reform credentials and across the country support base that is capable of attaining constitutional threshold to bring on board a president that will give Kenya a stable Government capable of completing a faithful implementation of the new constitution.".

6.
Mr. Kiraitu Murungi (second liberation leader): paraphrasing former Vice President Kijana Wamalwa, Kiraitu said of the PM: "Those who like Raila are fanatical about him. Those who dislike him do so with a lot of passion. But one fact we cannot deny is the Prime Minister is a heroic, charismatic and inspirational leader, committed to a radical economic transformation of this country."

7.
Mr. Abdikadir Sugow (politician from North Eastern): He says, "Raila never hesitates to make hard decisions, even if it means breaking friendships, alliances and even reconciling with opponents", "……always ready to sacrifice for the sake of others".

8.
Dr. Kilemi Mwiria (Ministry of Higher Education) observed, "Raila's opponents (in Mau restoration) have only made him stronger. Many Kenyans now know that you can count on him to take a decision that could derail his political ambitions for the sake of country. This side of his character is not new."

9.
Bishop David Gitari (outspoken religious leader): while supporting Prime Minister Raila Odinga's quest for the presidency, Gitari said he had the qualities of a good leader.

10.
Rev. Timothy Njoya (outspoken religious leader): Rev. Njoya said that, unlike others, Raila had established himself as a leader with a strong mind and with his own political boot straps (2002).

11.
Ms. Mumbi Ngaru (former Thika Deputy Mayor and PM's advisor) observed, "After my interaction with Raila Odinga, I realised that he was probably the only politician who understood the needs of Kenyans and has a dream for the country."
12. Sheikh Mohammed Warfa (Muslim preacher) said, "Raila has been at the forefront in fighting for equity and justice for the marginalised. That is why we have decided to give Raila 100 per cent support".

Others are
Mr. Mithika Linturi (Igembe South), former MP Mr. Maoka Maore and even those who have since joined competing camps like Ms. Charity Ngilu, Mr. Musalia Mudavadi and Mr. William Ruto are have commented on Raila's good leadership qualities.

Elsewhere, Mr. Macharia Gaitho (Daily Nation) observed, "With interventions on the Mau Forest crisis, the Grand Regency Hotel sale; and now the Port of Mombasa, Prime Minister Raila Odinga is displaying a rare kind of leadership. He seems to be driven by a missionary zeal to see Kenya succeed as a showcase of development." However, as we know, it takes team effort to succeed.

Others like Mr. Tom Mshindi (
Daily Nation) wondered, "PM is a great manager, but where is the team?…. Here is a leader who has the country's priorities right, and the courage to attempt to resolve thorny ones with the risk of upsetting entrenched interests."

It is unlikely to be the case that all of these people mentioned above (and many others not mentioned here) are wrong when it comes to their observations about PM Raila A. Odinga.

Knowing that weak institutions played an important role in the 2007/2008 post election violence, Raila's unwavering commitment to rule of law, strong institutions and sustainable development is the most at attractive to many in the Diaspora.

Coalitions are often hard to manage given competing interests and various levels of commitment but Raila's objective voice has regularly been heard and in cases like the ministry of roads, the public has seen and appreciated some results. Even though his party's manifesto still needs some priming, Raila's personal commitment to the issues therein puts him above the rest.

Through Raila's leadership, the Diaspora community sees a Kenya in which all are equal before the law and one in which personal and national security issues are taken with the seriousness they deserve. He is best placed to improve on Kibaki's performance. Kenyans must get it right ones and for all by voting in favour of efficient institutions, rule of law and sustainable development.

The final decision will be made by the cumulative votes of all Kenyans that will cast their ballots.

Following close observation and careful analysis, many in the Diaspora recommend Raila A. Odinga and his CORD team. This however neither means that this Diaspora group hates other candidates nor does it suggest a lack of better minds in Kenya. It is simply a recommendation of the optimal choice. As Dr. Kilemi Mwiria said, "We should ask some simple questions: Who among the presidential aspirants has a demonstrated history of fearlessly standing up for what is right irrespective of the possible negative consequences for self and family? Who has been the more national in outlook?" At this point in time, Raila A. Odinga and CORD is the optimal choice.

The quotes in this write-up are largely from the following articles (authors/publishers retain full rights):

1.
Abdikadir Sugow, "Raila: An enigma's political journey" in: The Standard, 23.12.2012 Edition.Standard Digital News - Kenya : Raila: An enigma?s political journeyE2%80%99s-political-journey

2.
Billy Muiruri and Jacob Ngetich, "Githae's dilemma over family loyalty" in: The Daily Nation,23.03.2011 Edition. http://www.nation.co.ke/News/politics/Githae+dilemma+over+family+loyalty+/-
/1064/1372466/-/13j8e4qz/-/index.html

3.
Njeri Rugene, "Raila likely to face censure motion over MPs tax row" in: The Daily Nation 06.07.2011 Edition. http://www.nation.co.ke/News/Raila+likely+to+face+censure+motion+over+MPs+tax+row/-
/1056/1195618/-/item/0/-/qwlex7z/-/index.html

4.
Peter Kuguru, "Bucking the trend: Why I support Raila" in: The Daily Nation, 14.03.2012 Edition. http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/Opinion/Bucking+the+trend+Why+I+support+Raila++/-/440808/1366354/-
/u9opuh/-/index.html

5.
Alex Ndegwa: "Raila leads President by 22pc in approval ratings" in: The Standard, 09.09.2008 Edition.

6.
Macharia Gaitho: "Raila, the performer, has impressed friend and foe" in: The Daily Nation,
11.08.2008 Edition.
Raila, the performer, has impressed friend and foe - Opinion - nation.co.ke


7.
Tom Mshindi: "PM is a great manager, but where is the team?" in: The Daily Nation 14.08.2008.
PM is a great manager, but where is the team? - Opinion - nation.co.ke

8.
Kilemi Mwiria: "Mau crisis may have cemented Raila's place ahead of the pack". In: The Standard28.11.2009.

Standard Digital News - Kenya : Home, Breaking News, Business, Jobs, Football, Travel, Tourism, Elections, National, Kenya, Nairobi, County, East Africa, Kibaki, Raila, Elections 2013, Choice 2013
ed%20Raila%E2%80%99s%20place%20ahead%20of%20the%20pack&id=%201144029151&cid=15&a
rticleID=1144029151

9. Mumbi Ngaru:
"Mumbi Ngaru: I know all about the kitchen politics of Kenya" in: The Standard 10.09.2011. Standard Digital News - Kenya : Magazines : Mumbi Ngaru: I know all about the kitchen politics of Kenya

10. Standard on Sunday, 24.08.2008
"Radical Raila Remodeled".
African Press International (API)

11.
Samuel Lumba, "Ministry attracts rare praise from matatu operators" in: The Daily Nation,
08.09.2009 Edition.
Ministry attracts rare praise from matatu operators - News - nation.co.ke

12.
Gakuu Mathenge, "Kiraitu showers Prime Minister with unusual praise" in: The Standard, 08.10.2011
Edition.
Standard Digital News - Kenya : Home, Breaking News, Business, Jobs, Football, Travel, Tourism, Elections, National, Kenya, Nairobi, County, East Africa, Kibaki, Raila, Elections 2013, Choice 2013
20Prime%20Minister%20with%20unusual%20praise

13.
Gitobu Imanyara, „Gitobu: I will support Raila to the end" in: The Standard, 29.09.2012 Edition.
Standard Digital News - Kenya : Gitobu: I will support Raila to the end

14.
George Olwenya and Kepha Otieno: "Forget presidency, Gitari tells Uhuru" in: The Standard,30.01.2012. Standard Digital News - Kenya : Home, Breaking News, Business, Jobs, Football, Travel, Tourism, Elections, National, Kenya, Nairobi, County, East Africa, Kibaki, Raila, Elections 2013, Choice 2013
Gitari%20tells%20Uhuru

15.
Anyang Nyon'go, "How CORD government plans to create employment opportunities" in: The Standard, 03.02.2013 Edition. Standard Digital News - Kenya : Columns : How CORD government plans to create employment opportunities
employment-opportunities

16.
Julius Sigei, "Why Central elite is turning to Raila" in: The Daily Nation, 11.11.2011 Edition, Why Central elite is turning to Raila - Politics - nation.co.ke/index.html

17. Oscar Obonyo's interview with Joe Khamisi in: The Standard 24.04.2011.
Standard Digital News - Kenya : County_Western : I lost Bahari seat because I associated myself with Kalonzo
18. The Daily Nation, 24.12.2012 Edition:
"Muslim clerics back Raila presidency bid". http://www.nation.co.ke/News/politics/Muslim-clerics-back-Raila-presidency-bid/-/1064/1650742/-
/v9cs1o/-/index.html

Why many Kenyans in the Diaspora are convinced that CORD under PM Odinga is Kenya

 
Da Uhuruto juzi walifurahia matamshi ya Obama,kumbe wanaogopa eh,sasa mambo yamegeuka huenda hawakumuelewa Obama,kila kona wanaminywa kama''kotapin''ya baiskeli kwa wasiojua kotapin ,kotapi'ni pin yenye urefu wa robo nchi ambayo inabana pedals za kuendeshea baiskeli ili muendeshaji aendeshe baiskeli kwa mzunguko ulio sawa.Chagueni Uhuruto ili nanyi mubanwe kama kotapin,si muda mrefu ili kununua Tusker moja inabidi fedha ubebe kwenye mfuko wa plastiki,mnaelekea kwa Uncle Bob wa Zimbabwe,au itabidi muanze kula panya kama alivyosema waziri mmoja
 
Anybody asking himself why now? You people should develop the art of reading between the lines, the ground is shifting.
 
Read between the lines of US President’s message to Kenya

By Nathan Wangusi

Kenyans are pleasantly surprised that their most celebrated kinsman the US President Barack Obama finally broke the silence on his take on the coming elections.

In a carefully worded two and half minute YouTube address, the President said the US does not endorse any candidate and respects the will of the people of Kenya in choosing their leaders during elections.

In his characteristic diplomatic yet subtle forceful style he reiterated the US Government’s commitment to fostering a strong alliance with Kenya and called on Kenyans to be peaceful and observe the rule of law during the March 4 General Election. Superficially, the message seemed obvious and direct.

Like everyone else I was initially elated, but unlike most and having worked in his presidential campaign I read between the lines of every word this master politician and skilful diplomat says.

The genius of President Obama is his ability to communicate his vision, thoughts and intentions without sounding threatening. On this occasion I questioned whether his motive was to exhort Kenyans, whether he was using the bully pulpit to put questionable presidential candidates on notice or whether he was using his foreign policy philosophy of “soft power” to stave off a potentially volatile poll reminiscent of the bungled 2007 elections. Perhaps, he was going on record to counter the common misconception that he has a bias for Prime Minister Raila Odinga’s CORD alliance.

What folks seemed to have missed is that the message was loaded with conditional political promises and overtures that isolated a particular candidature without giving any endorsements and conversely without making any veiled threats. The saying goes that an accused is innocent until proven otherwise hence one cannot make judgments. The saying also goes that the guilty are afraid hence one can only make the observation that those the message may have been directed to quickly responded. In a hastily convened press conference shortly after the message was released, the Jubilee Alliance leaders thanked Obama for reiterating his neutrality.

Now the million dollar question is whether Jubilee presidential candidate Deputy Prime Minister Uhuru Kenyatta and his running mate William Ruto were responding out of trepidation of being put on notice as unfit leaders given their ICC woes or out of overconfidence of a decisive election victory because of what political pundit Mutahi Ngunyi called the “Tyranny of Numbers”?

Was President Obama speaking as a big brother intent on saving Kenyans from themselves and protecting them from The Hague-bound duo who have successfully tied their personal criminal fate to the destiny of Kenya or in concession to an obvious triumph by the Jubilee Alliance in which case the world would be forced to deal with the intrigue of an Uhuru/Ruto presidency? Your guess is as good as mine but the US President does not take two and half minutes out of the worlds pressing problems exactly a month to the election unless it is a priority. Kenya’s fate lies in the answer to this question and while it is still a mystery, the answer will be determined at the ballot box on March 4.

The message that was resoundingly clear was that we must conduct coming elections peacefully and with civility. There is a broad recognition that this being the first election under a new constitutional dispensation is crucial. Evidently, March 4 will be possibly one of the most important days for Kenya. It will either go down in history as a day when we rose to the occasion and embarked on a new era of prosperity, the rule of law and ethnic tolerance or a day when we squandered our future. On Election Day as President Obama succinctly put it, vote not just as a member of a tribe, but also as a citizen of great and proud nation.

The writer is a Phd candidate at the University of Florida in Gainesville

Standard Digital News - Kenya : Opinion : Read between the lines of US President?s message to Kenya
 
Acha tushuhudie jinsi uchumi wao utakavyoporomoka kwa kuendekeza ukabila wao!
 
"We believe
individuals accused of crimes against humanity should go before the courts to prove their innocenceor suffer the consequences of the judgements if they are found guilty,"

The sentence is they believe...not it should be....that those that are accused of crimes against humanity should visit the hague. The last red line is a clear reflection of impunity by declaring publicly the consequences of judgements before any ruling is made by the court.

On the flip side Carson and Obama knows that they will lose big-time an "anchor-in-the-nighbourhood" if they continue remaining policy prescriptors while china's influence and business horizons are expanding within kenyas borders. It was just the other day Google's CEO said that kenya is the next destination for ICT, he wouldn't have uttered these words knowing that kenya was to become a potental "pariah state" in the making. And Google is not a chinese company. Those and other Organizations like IBM etc who have already setup a big centre somewhere..... shows investor confidences. Step one has failed and Carson's resolve that is more of an expression of smug than diplomacy has not utterly neutralized investor confidence.

Those that keep mentioning companies shiftng base from kenya to TZ or uganda due to ICC consequences, are not based on facts but are debates centred on flux ignorance. Wasn't it the other day that British airways closed shop in TZ Dar-es-salaam due to non-competitiveness of the economic environment? ..................... UGanda's case economically is even practically mysterious! in East Africa there is nowhere competitive and guarantees returns on investments than kenya. Carson being aware of this, had to say we believe.
 
Da Uhuruto juzi walifurahia matamshi ya Obama,kumbe wanaogopa eh,sasa mambo yamegeuka huenda hawakumuelewa Obama,kila kona wanaminywa kama''kotapin''ya baiskeli kwa wasiojua kotapin ,kotapi'ni pin yenye urefu wa robo nchi ambayo inabana pedals za kuendeshea baiskeli ili muendeshaji aendeshe baiskeli kwa mzunguko ulio sawa.Chagueni Uhuruto ili nanyi mubanwe kama kotapin,si muda mrefu ili kununua Tusker moja inabidi fedha ubebe kwenye mfuko wa plastiki,mnaelekea kwa Uncle Bob wa Zimbabwe,au itabidi muanze kula panya kama alivyosema waziri mmoja
mfianchi,

Hakuna mzungu mgeni au wawekezaji awe yeyote in their right minds atahama kenya na kufunga virago kwa madai ya ICC,. Hakuna mwekezaji atakaye salimisha faida zake kwa madai ya ICC and is quite impractible for crippling sanctions ambayo ndo phrase inakuwa peddled. Kwa hivyo jamii ya kimataifa wanapotazama mambo haya yote ni lazima wawe cautious wanapotoa matamshi yao. Hapa ni mithili ya karata baina ya wachezaji wawili... anayeshindwa anasalia humu au anabeba machungu kuenda ngambo
 
Ab-Titchaz,

Mkuu heshima mbele

can you come with a policy where people do an actual analysis of threads they post rather than copy-pasting a load of articles one after the other. We want to know what people think them. We actually want to know if people know and understand what they are actually posting. When a thread says Kenyan politics, it does not mean that every article from every tom dick and harry will find its way on the political forum since most of them are posted by distraught fellas and there will be bias in what and how they express.
 
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is westerners believe in democracy or threats?
 
Ab-Titchaz,

Mkuu heshima mbele

can you come with a policy where people do an actual analysis of threads they post rather than copy-pasting a load of articles one after the other. We want to know what people think them. We actually want to know if people know and understand what they are actually posting. When a thread says Kenyan politics, it does not mean that every article from every tom dick and harry will find its way on the political forum since most of them are posted by distraught fellas and there will be bias in what and how they express.

I hear thee my comrade Kabaridi,...heshima narudisha kwako mkuu mwenzangu.

...Now that is a slippery slope you are asking me to navigate because to an extent in borders on gagging/censoring.

...most of the time in such matters if you don't like what an individual is posting wewe lenga tu otherwise
mtavutana mashati mpaka asubuhi ukimwambia mtu they can post A but cant post B.

Shukran.
 
Anybody asking himself why now? .

I'm wondering what you mean by the above question yet this something that has been spoken of ever since
day one (when the envelope was made public). The ramifications of ICC inductees being elected into office
has been a question Kenyans have asked and that is why their is a case in court about this matter which
will be adjudicated this coming week. These so called friends of Kenya are simply making it known what their
is and has always been.

I don't see how 'ground shifting' comes into play here.
 
The sentence is they believe...not it should be....that those that are accused of crimes against humanity should visit the hague. The last red line is a clear reflection of impunity by declaring publicly the consequences of judgements before any ruling is made by the court.

We are splitting hairs on semantics bro! ...and then maybe its my English but I don't believe stating your stand or
opinion on an issue amounts to impunity. For the bible tells me 'the wages of sin is death'...Is that impunity by the
good book?...Food for thought.



On the flip side Carson and Obama knows that they will lose big-time an "anchor-in-the-nighbourhood" if they continue remaining policy prescriptors while china's influence and business horizons are expanding within kenyas borders. It was just the other day Google's CEO said that kenya is the next destination for ICT, he wouldn't have uttered these words knowing that kenya was to become a potental "pariah state" in the making. And Google is not a chinese company. Those and other Organizations like IBM etc who have already setup a big centre somewhere..... shows investor confidences. Step one has failed and Carson's resolve that is more of an expression of smug than diplomacy has not utterly neutralized investor confidence.

One thing I know is that the companies are private entities and they can say what they want about setting up shop
in a free market. I have no qualms with that. However, we should be prudent to know that people work for these
companies and they are citizens of one nation or the other. When it comes to their security being guaranteed in
these investment countries they always listen to their governments. I believe you are conversant with 'travel
advisories'. The ability of them to shift camps is like the blink of an eye. They can say all things rosy and business
friendly lakini ukweli ni kwamba when sanctions start biting, they will have to ship out. Reason being it will simply
become too expensive to do business or in a worse situation, the mother country forbids the company from doing
business with lets say Kenya as example. Ukikataa, the company faces serious litigation issues back at home
including their license to do business being revoked.

On that Chinese thing you trying to talk about, I have one question for you; Show me an example of an African
country that has a successful economic history after 'Facing the East'? The other day Uhuru Kenyatta went
ballistic after Netherlands banned the sell of miraa over there. That was a billion shilling market that was just
taken away from the Meru farmers just like that. We might holler as much as we want about the West being this or the
West being that or we don't need them...yada....yada...yada.... but truth be told these economies are so
entwined that you cant just break apart on a whim without facing some diabolic consequences.

Those that keep mentioning companies shiftng base from kenya to TZ or uganda due to ICC consequences, are not based on facts but are debates centred on flux ignorance. Wasn't it the other day that British airways closed shop in TZ Dar-es-salaam due to non-competitiveness of the economic environment? ..................... UGanda's case economically is even practically mysterious! in East Africa there is nowhere competitive and guarantees returns on investments than kenya. Carson being aware of this, had to say we believe.

I like your bravado on this one too but I will tell you what, wish this thing away carelessly at your own peril!
The ICC thing is here to stay and the ramifications therein are real. Tafakari.
 
Back
Top Bottom