Why did Zuckerberg choose now to Confess?

[Mathanzua]

Why did Mark Zuckerberg choose now to confess?

Monday, September 02, 2024

Consider Mark Zuckerberg’s revelation and its implications for our understanding of the last four years, and what it means for the future.

On many subjects important to public life today, vast numbers of people know the truth, and yet the official channels of information sharing are reluctant to admit it. The Fed admits no fault in inflation and neither do most members of Congress. The food companies don’t admit the harm of the mainstream American diet. The pharmaceutical companies are loath to admit any injury. Media companies deny any bias. So on it goes.

And yet everyone else does know, already and more and more so.
This is why the admission of Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg was so startling. It’s not what he admitted. We already knew what he revealed. What’s new is that he admitted it. We are simply used to living in a world swimming in lies. It rattles us when a major figure tells us what is true or even partially or slightly true. We almost cannot believe it, and we wonder what the motivation might be.

In his letter to Congressional investigators, he flat-out said what everyone else has been saying for years now.

In 2021, senior officials from the Biden Administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain COVID-19 content, including humor and satire, and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we didn’t agree….I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it. I also think we made some choices that, with the benefit of hindsight and new information, we wouldn’t make today. Like I said to our teams at the time, I feel strongly that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any Administration in either direction – and we’re ready to push back if something like this happens again.

A few clarifications. The censorship began much earlier than that, from March 2020 at the very least if not earlier. We all experienced it, almost immediately following lockdowns.

After a few weeks, using that platform to get the word out proved impossible. Facebook once made a mistake and let my piece on Woodstock and the 1969 flu go through but they would never make that mistake again. For the most part, every single opponent of the terrible policies was deplatformed at all levels.

The implications are far more significant than the bloodless letter of Zuckerberg suggests. People consistently underestimate the power that Facebook has over the public mind. This was especially true in the 2020 and 2022 election cycles.

The difference in having an article unthrottled much less amplified by Facebook in these years was in the millionfold. When my article went through, I experienced a level of traffic that I had never seen in my career. It was mind-boggling. When the article was shut down some two weeks later – after focused troll accounts alerted Facebook that the algorithms had made a mistake – traffic fell to the usual trickle.

Again, in my entire career of closely following internet traffic patterns, I had never seen anything like this.
Facebook as an information source offers power like we’ve never seen before, especially because so many people, especially among the voting public, believe that the information they are seeing is from their friends and family and sources they trust. The experience of Facebook and other platforms framed the reality that people believed existed outside of themselves.

Every dissident, and every normal person who had some sense that something odd was going on, was made to feel like some sort of crazy cretin who held nutty and probably dangerous views that were completely out of touch with the mainstream.

What does it mean that Zuckerberg now openly admits that he excluded from view anything that contradicted government wishes? It means that any opinions on lockdowns, masks, or vaccine mandates – and all that is associated with that including church and school closures plus vaccine harms – were not part of the public debate.

We had lived through and were living through the most significant far-reaching attacks on our rights and liberties in our lifetimes, or, arguably, on the history record in terms of scale and reach, and it was not part of any serious public debate. Zuckerberg played an enormous role in this.

People like me had come to believe that average people were simply cowards or stupid not to object. Now we know that this might not have been true at all! The people who objected were simply silenced!
During two election cycles, the Covid response was not really in play as a public controversy. This helps account for why. It also means that any candidate who attempted to make this an issue was automatically downgraded in terms of reach.

How many candidates are we talking about here? Considering all the US elections at the federal, state, and local levels, we are talking about several thousand at least. In every case, the candidate who was speaking out about the most egregious attacks on liberty came to be effectively silenced.

A good example is the Minnesota governor’s race in 2022 that was won by Tim Walz, now running as VP with Kamala Harris. The election pitted Walz against a knowledgeable and highly credentialed medical expert, Dr. Scott Jensen, who made the Covid response a campaign issue. Here is how the vote totals lined up.

​

Of course, Dr. Jensen could get no traction at all on Facebook, which was enormously influential in this election and which just admitted that it was following government guidelines in censoring posts. In fact, Facebook banned him from advertising completely. It reduced his reach by 90% and likely lost him the election.
You can listen to Jensen’s account here:


Consider how many other elections were affected. It’s astonishing to think of the implications of this. It means that quite possibly an entire generation of elected leaders in this country was not legitimately elected, if by legitimate we mean a well-informed public that is given a choice concerning the issues that affect their lives.

Zuckerberg’s censorship – and this pertains to Google, Instagram, Microsoft’s LinkedIn, and Twitter 1.0 – denied the public a choice on the central matter of lockdowns, masking, and shot mandates, the very issues that have fundamentally roiled the whole of civilization and set the path of history on a dark course.

And it is not just the US. These are all global companies, meaning that elections in every other country, all over the globe, were similarly affected. It was a global shutdown of all opposition to radical, egregious, unworkable, and deeply damaging policies.

When you think about it this way, this is not just some minor error in judgment. This was an earth-shattering decision that goes way beyond managerial cowardice. It goes beyond even election manipulation. It is an outright coup that overthrew an entire generation of leaders who stood up for freedom and replaced them with a generation of leaders who acquiesced to power exactly at the time it mattered the most.

Why did Zuckerberg choose now to make this announcement and publicly reveal the inside play? He was obviously unnerved by the assassination attempt on Trump’s life, as he said.

Then also you have the French arrest of Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov, an event which surely rattles any major CEO of a communication platform. You have the arrest and incarceration of other dissidents like Steve Bannon and many others.

You also have the litigation over free speech back in play now that RFK, Jr has been cleared as having standing, kicking the case of Missouri v. Biden back to the Supreme Court, which wrongly decided last time to deny standing to other plaintiffs.

Zuckerberg of all people knows the stakes. He understands the implications and the scale of the problem, as well as the depths of the corruption and deception at play in the US, EU, UK, and all over the world. He may figure that everything is going to come out at some point, so he might as well get ahead of the curve.

Of all the companies in the world that would have a real handle on the state of public opinion right now, it would be Facebook. They see the scale of the support for Trump. And Trump has said on multiple occasions, including in a new book coming out in early September, that he believes Zuckerberg should be prosecuted for his role in manipulating election outcomes. What if, for example, his own internal data is showing 10 to 1 support for Trump over Kamala, completely contradicting the polls which are not credible anyway? That alone could account for his change of heart.

It becomes especially pressing since the person who did the censoring at the Biden White House, Rob Flaherty, now serves as Digital Communications Strategist for the Harris/Walz campaign. There can be no question that the DNC intends to deploy all the same tools, many times over and far more powerful, should they take back the White House.

​

“Under Rob’s leadership,” said Biden upon Flaherty’s resignation, “we’ve built the largest Office of Digital Strategy in history and, with it, a digital strategy and culture that brought people together instead of dividing them.”

At this point, it’s safe to assume that even the most well-informed outsider knows about 0.5% of the whole of the manipulation, deception, and backroom machinations that have taken place over the past five or so years. Investigators on the case have said that there are hundreds of thousands of pages of evidence that are not classified but have yet to be revealed to the public. Maybe all of this will pour forth starting in the new year.

Therefore, the Zuckerberg admission has much larger implications than anyone has yet admitted.
It provides a first official and confirmed peek into the greatest scandal of our times, the global silencing of critics at all levels of society, resulting in manipulating election outcomes, a distorted public culture, the marginalization of dissent, the overriding of all free speech protections, and gaslighting as a way of life of government in our times.

 

[Juuchini]

Kwanini usiweke kwa kiswahili
Hadhira yako no waswahili humu

 

[Ushimen]

Sijasoma kabisa, ila naunga mkono hoja..😊

 

[Cannabis]

While I appreciate the depth and nuance of the conversation taking place here, I must admit that I find myself in a position where I have little to add of substantive value. The perspectives already presented are comprehensive and well-articulated, leaving me with no unique insights or further analysis to offer. Rather than risk diluting the discourse with redundant or superficial remarks, I will refrain from commenting further. I will, however, continue to observe the discussion with interest, as there is much to learn from the thoughtful contributions of others.

 

[Anthony horowitz]

hamna uliye mlipia ada humu, andiko gumu Kama mwarobaini

 

[Mathanzua]

Kwanini usiweke kwa kiswahili
Hadhira yako no waswahili humu

Si mnasema Kingereza sio lazima na mnataka mashuleni kila somo liwe kwa Kiswahili?That is a very bad decision you people have taken.The best way should have been to strengthen all systems related to English teaching so that pupils can know English right from Primary School.

 

[Ngurukia]

Inatia uvivu kusoma. Ndefu sana.

Kila nikisoma nasikia njaa.

Muanzisha uzi, soma mwenyewe ucomment mwenyewe.

 

[Ngurukia]

Si mnasema Kingereza sio lazima na mnataka mashuleni kila somo liwe kwa Kiswahili?That is a very bad option you people have decided to adopt.The best way should have been to strengthen all systems related to English teaching so that pupils can know English right from Primary School.

Sasa hapo umejiambia mwenyewe maana bado haibadilishi kuwa hatuelewei😃😃

 

[Ngurukia]

While I appreciate the depth and nuance of the conversation taking place here, I must admit that I find myself in a position where I have little to add of substantive value. The perspectives already presented are comprehensive and well-articulated, leaving me with no unique insights or further analysis to offer. Rather than risk diluting the discourse with redundant or superficial remarks, I will refrain from commenting further. I will, however, continue to observe the discussion with interest, as there is much to learn from the thoughtful contributions of others.

Sijaelewa chochote ila umeongea point tupu Mzee Baba. Nakubaliana na wewe mia kwa mia.

 

[Mathanzua]

hamna uliye mlipia ada humu, andiko gumu Kama mwarobaini

Pole

 

[Mathanzua]

Inatia uvivu kusoma. Ndefu sana.

Kila nikisoma nasikia njaa.

Muanzisha uzi, soma mwenyewe ucomment mwenyewe.

Ndio maana mlichanja Corona kwa kuwa ukweli ulikuwa kwa Kingereza na msingeweza kuelewa.Sasa sisi wenzenu tunaojua Kingereza tulipokuwa tukiwaeleza hamkutaka kutuelewa mkaamini udaku wa MSM uliokuwa kwa Kiswahili mkachanja,hadi huruma kwa kweli. Poleni sana.

 

[gallow bird]

Ndio maana mlichanja Corona kwa kuwa ukweli ulikuwa kwa Kingereza na msingeweza kuelewa.Sasa sisi wenzenu tunaojua Kingereza tulipokuwa tukiwaeleza hamkutaka kutuelewa mkaamini udaku wa MSM uliokuwa kwa Kiswahili mkachanja,hadi huruma kwa kweli. Poleni sana.

Umeshupaa na chanjo za covid-19 tu,mwenza wako na wanafamilia wanna shida sana,itakua una gubu sana

 

[Ngurukia]

Ndio maana mlichanja Corona kwa kuwa ukweli ulikuwa kwa Kingereza na msingeweza kuelewa.Sasa sisi wenzenu tunaojua Kingereza tulipokuwa tukiwaeleza hamkutaka kutuelewa mkaamini udaku wa MSM uliokuwa kwa Kiswahili mkachanja,hadi huruma kwa kweli. Poleni sana.

Jamaa unatuvimbia na kizungu chako. Sawa bwana.

Ila mimi najua Kinyakyusa kwahiyo nimekuzidi.

 

[ABBM]

Tafsiri isiyo rasmi

Kwa nini Mark Zuckerberg alichagua sasa kukiri?

Septemba 2, 2024

Fikiria ufunuo wa Mark Zuckerberg na athari zake kwa uelewa wetu wa miaka minne, na maana yake kwa siku zijazo.

Katika masuala mengi muhimu kwa maisha ya umma leo, idadi kubwa ya watu wanajua ukweli, na bado njia rasmi ya kushiriki habari zinasita kuukubali. Fed haikubali kosa katika mfumuko wa bei na wanachama wengi wa Congress. Makampuni ya chakula hayakubali madhara ya chakula cha kawaida cha Marekani. Makampuni ya dawa yanachukia kukubali jeraha lolote. Makampuni ya vyombo vya habari yanakataa upendeleo. Kwa hivyo inaendelea.

Na bado kila mtu mwingine anajua, tayari na zaidi na zaidi.
Ndio maana kupokelewa kwa Mark Zuckerberg wa Facebook kuangaza sana. Sio kile alichokiri. Tayari tulijua alichofichua. Jambo jipya ni kwamba alikubali. Tumezoea kuishi katika ulimwengu unaoogelea katika uongo. Inatushangaza wakati mtu mkuu anapotuambia ukweli au hata sehemu au ukweli kidogo. Karibu hatuwezi kuamini, na tunashangaa ni nini motisha inaweza kuwa.

Katika barua yake kwa wachunguzi wa Congress, alisema kile ambacho kila mtu amekuwa akisema kwa miaka sasa.

2021, maafisa wakuu kutoka kwa Utawala wa Biden, pamoja na Ikulu ya White House, walisisitiza timu zetu mara kwa mara kwa mara kwa mara mifumo kadhaa data data fulani ya COVID-19, pamoja na ucheshi na kejeli, na walionyesha kufadhaika sana na timu zetu hatukubaliani… .Ninaamini shinikizo la serikali lilikuwa na makosa , na ninajuta kwamba hatukuzungumza zaidi kuhusu hilo. Pia nadhani tulifanya chaguo ambazo, kwa manufaa ya kutazama nyuma na taarifa mpya, hatungefanya leo. Kama nilivyoziambia timu zetu wakati huo, ninahisi kwa nguvu kwamba hatupaswi kuhatarisha viwango vyetu vya maudhui kutokana na shinikizo kutoka kwa Utawala wowote kwa pande zote mbili - na tuko tayari kurudisha nyuma jambo kama hili likitokea tena.

Ufanuzi machache. Udhibiti ulianza mapema zaidi kuliko hapo, kutoka Machi 2020 angalau ikiwa sio mapema. Sote tulikumbana nayo, karibu mara moja baada ya kufuli.

Baada ya wiki chache kutumia jukwaa hilo kutoa neno kuonekana, haiwezekani. Facebook mara moja ilifanya makosa na kipande changu kwenye Woodstock na mafua ya 1969 kupitia lakini hawangefanya kosa hilo tena. Kwa sehemu kubwa, kila mpinzani mmoja wa sera mbaya alivurugwa katika viwango vyote.

Madhara ni muhimu zaidi kuliko barua ya Zuckerberg isiyo na damu inavyopendekezwa. Watu mara kwa mara hudharau nguvu ambayo Facebook inayo juu ya akili ya umma. Hii ilikuwa kweli hasa katika mizunguko ya uchaguzi wa 2020 na 2022.

Tofauti ya kuwa na makala ambayo haijashughulikiwa kidogo sana na Facebook katika miaka hii ilikua mara milioni. Wakati makala yangu ilipitia, nilipata kiwango cha trafiki ambacho sijawahi kuona katika kazi yangu. Ilikuwa ya kushangaza. Wakati makala yalipofungwa wiki mbili baadaye - baada ya akaunti za troll zilizolenga kuarifu Facebook kwamba algoriti zimefanya makosa - trafiki ilianguka kwa njia ya kawaida.

Tena, katika kazi yangu yote ya kufuata kwa karibu mifumo ya trafiki ya mtandao, sijawahi kuona kitu kama hiki.
Facebook kama chanzo cha habari kinatoa nguvu kama hatukuwahi kuona hapo awali, haswa kwa sababu watu wengi sana, haswa kati ya watu wanaopiga kura, wanaamini kuwa habari wanayoona ni kutoka kwa marafiki na familia zao na vyanzo wanaamini. Uzoefu wa Facebook na majukwaa mengine uliweka ukweli ambao watu waliamini kuwa ulikuwepo nje yao wenyewe.

Kila mpinzani, na kila mtu wa kawaida ambaye alikuwa na hisia kwamba kitu kisichobaki kikiendelea, alifanywa kuhisi kama aina fulani ya cretin wazimu ambaye alikuwa na maoni ya kupendeza na pengine hatari ambayo hayakuguswa kabisa na tawala.

Je, ina maana gani kwamba Zuckerberg sasa anakiri wazi kwamba alijitenga na maoni yoyote ambayo yanapingana na matakwa ya serikali? Inamaanisha kuwa maoni juu ya kufuli, barakoa, mamlaka ya chanjo - na yote ambayo yanahusishwa na hayo ikiwa ni pamoja na kufungwa kwa kanisa pamoja na madhara ya chanjo - hayakuwa sehemu ya mjadala wa umma.

Tulikuwa tumeishi na tulikuwa tukiishi kupitia mauzo makubwa zaidi ya haki na uhuru wetu katika maisha yetu, au, kwa ubishi, kwenye rekodi ya historia katika suala la ukubwa na mkakati, na haikuwa sehemu ya mjadala wowote mzito wa umma. Zuckerberg alicheza jukumu kubwa katika hili.

Watu kama mimi walikuwa wameamini kwamba watu wa kawaida walikuwa waoga au wajinga kutopinga. Sasa tunajua kwamba hii inaweza kuwa si kweli hata kidogo! Watu waliopinga walinyamazishwa tu!
Wakati wa mizunguko miwili ya uchaguzi, majibu ya Covid hayakuwa ya kucheza kama mabishano ya umma. Hii husaidia kuhesabu kwa nini. Inamaanisha pia kwamba maombi yoyote aliyejaribu kufanya hili suala alishushwa katika suala la kumaliza.

Je, hapa tunazungumzia wangapi? Kwa chaguzi zote za Marekani katika ngazi ya ngazi, jimbo na mitaa, tunazungumza kuhusu maelfu angalau. Kwa kila hali, ambaye alikuwa anazungumza juu ya mashambulio mabaya zaidi dhidi ya uhuru alikuja kunyamazishwa vilivyo.

Mfano mzuri ni mbio za ugavana wa Minnesota mwaka wa 2022 ambazo zilishindwa na Tim Walz, ambaye sasa anagombea nafasi ya VP pamoja na Kamala Harris. Uchaguzi huo ulimshindanisha Walz na mtaalam wa matibabu mwenye ujuzi na sifa ya juu, Dk. Scott Jensen, ambaye ndiye majibu ya Covid kuwa suala la kampeni. Hivi ndivyo jumla ya kura zilivyopangwa.

.
Bila shaka, Dk. Jensen hakuweza kupata mvuto kwenye Facebook, ambayo ilikuwa na ushawishi mkubwa katika uchaguzi huu ambao ilikiri kwamba ilikuwa ikifuata miongozo ya serikali katika kukagua machapisho. Kwa hakika, Facebook ilimpiga marufuku kutangaza kabisa. Ilipunguza wake kwa 90% na labda ikampoteza uchaguzi.
Unaweza kusikiliza akaunti ya Jensen hapa:


Zingatia chaguzi zingine nyingi ziliathiriwa. Inashangaza athari za hii. Ina maana kwamba inawezekana kabisa kizazi cha viongozi waliochaguliwa katika nchi hii hakikuchaguliwa kihalali, ikiwa kwa uhalili tunamaanisha umma wenye ufahamu wa kutosha ambao unapewa chaguo kuhusu masuala yanayohusu maisha yao.

Udhibiti wa Zuckerberg - na hii inahusu Google, Instagram, LinkedIn ya Microsoft, na Twitter 1.0 - ilinyima umma chaguo juu ya suala kuu la kufuli, kuficha uso, na mamlaka ya kupiga risasi, maswala ambayo kimsingi yamesumbua ustaarabu wote na kuweka ustaarabu. njia ya historia kwenye mwendo wa giza.

Na sio Marekani pekee. Haya yote ni mataifa ya kimataifa, ikimaanisha kuwa uchaguzi katika kila nchi nyingine, ulimwenguni kote, uliathiriwa vivyo hivyo. Ilikuwa ni kizuizi cha kimataifa cha upinzani wote kwa sera kali, mbaya, zisizoweza kutekelezeka, zinazoharibu sana sera.

Unapofikiria juu yake kwa njia hii, hii sio tu makosa madogo katika kichwa. Huu ulikuwa mwanzo wa kutisha ambao unapita zaidi ya woga wa mapato. Inapita hata ghiliba za uchaguzi. Ni mapinduzi ya moja kwa moja yaliyokiangusha kizazi cha viongozi waliosimama kidete kupigania uhuru na nafasi yake kuchukuliwa na kizazi cha viongozi waliokubali kutawala kwa wakati ule uliokuwa muhimu zaidi.

Kwa nini Zuckerberg alichagua sasa kutoa tangazo hili na kufichua hadharani mchezo wa ndani? Ni wazi kwamba alisikitishwa na jaribio la mauaji dhidi ya maisha ya Trump, kama alivyosema.

Kisha pia una kukamatwa kwa Ufaransa kwa mwanzilishi na Mkurugenzi wa Telegram Pavel Durov, tukio ambalo hakika linasumbua Mkurugenzi yeyote mkuu wa jukwaa la mawasiliano. Una kukamatwa na kufungwa kwa wengine kama Steve Bannon na wengine wengine.

Pia una kesi ya kudai uhuru wa kujieleza inayoendelea sasa kwa vile RFK, Jr ameidhinishwa kuwa amesimama, akiirudisha kesi ya Missouri v. Biden kwenye Mahakama ya Juu, ambayo iliamua kimakosa mara ya mwisho kukana kusimama mbele ya washtaki wengine.

Zuckerberg wa watu wote anajua vigingi. Anaelewa athari na ukubwa wa tatizo, pamoja na kina cha ufisadi unaofanyika Marekani, EU, Uingereza, na duniani kote. Anaweza kufikiri kwamba kila kitu kitatoka wakati fulani, hivyo anaweza pia kupata mbele ya curve.

Kati ya kampuni zote ulimwenguni ambazo zingekuwa na ushughulikiaji wa kweli juu ya hali ya maoni ya umma hivi sasa, itakuwa Facebook. Wanaona ukubwa wa uungwaji mkono kwa Trump. Na Trump amesema mara nyingi, ikiwa ni pamoja na katika kitabu kipya kilichotoka mapema Septemba, kwamba anaamini Zuckerberg anapaswa kufunguliwa mashitaka kwa jukumu lake la kuchezea matokeo ya uchaguzi. Je, ikiwa, kwa mfano, data yake ya ndani 10 hadi 1 kumuunga mkono Trump juu ya Kamala, ikipingana kabisa na kura ambazo haziaminiki? Hilo pekee lingeweza kutoa hesabu kwa ajili ya mabadiliko yake ya moyo.

Inakuwa ya kusumbua sana kwani mtu ambaye ndiye udhibiti katika Biden White House, Rob Flaherty, sasa anatumika kama Mtaalamu wa Mikakati wa Mawasiliano ya Kidijitali kwa kampeni ya Harris/Walz. Hatuwezi kuwa na swali kwamba DNC inakusudia kupeleka zana zote sawa, mara nyingi zaidi na zenye nguvu zaidi, ikiwa watairudisha Ikulu.

.
"Chini ya uongozi wa Rob," Biden alisema ya kujiuzulu kwa Flaherty, "tumejenga Ofisi kubwa zaidi ya Mkakati wa Dijiti katika historia na, pamoja nayo, mkakati wa kidijitali na utamaduni ambao ulileta watu pamoja badala ya kuwagawanya."

Katika hatua hii, ni salama kudhani kwamba hata mgeni aliye na ufahamu wa kutosha anajua kuhusu 0.5% ya ghiliba nzima, taarifa na njama ambazo zimefanyika katika kipindi cha miaka mia zaidi au zaidi. Wachunguzi wa kesi hiyo wamesema kuwa kuna mamia ya maelfu ya kurasa za ushahidi ambazo hazijainishwa lakini bado hazijafichuliwa kwa umma. yote haya yatamiminika kuanzia mwanzo mpya.

Kwa hiyo, uandikishaji wa Zuckerberg una maana kubwa zaidi kuliko mtu yeyote ambaye bado amekubali.
Inatoa uchunguzi rasmi wa kwanza na uliothibitishwa katika kashfa kubwa zaidi ya nyakati zetu , kunyamazishwa kwa wakosoaji ulimwenguni katika viwango vyote vya jamii, na imani kuchakachua matokeo ya uchaguzi, utamaduni potovu wa umma, kutengwa kwa upinzani, kubatilisha ulinzi wote wa uhuru wa kujieleza. , na mwanga wa gesi kama njia ya maisha ya serikali katika nyakati zetu.

 

[Hammaz]

Jamaa unatuvimbia na kizungu chako. Sawa bwana.

Ila mimi najua Kinyakyusa kwahiyo nimekuzidi.

Mughonile.. Bhandugu. 😃😃

 

[Mathanzua]

Tafsiri isiyo rasmi

Kwa nini Mark Zuckerberg alichagua sasa kukiri?

Septemba 2, 2024

Fikiria ufunuo wa Mark Zuckerberg na athari zake kwa uelewa wetu wa miaka minne, na maana yake kwa siku zijazo.

Katika masuala mengi muhimu kwa maisha ya umma leo, idadi kubwa ya watu wanajua ukweli, na bado njia rasmi ya kushiriki habari zinasita kuukubali. Fed haikubali kosa katika mfumuko wa bei na wanachama wengi wa Congress. Makampuni ya chakula hayakubali madhara ya chakula cha kawaida cha Marekani. Makampuni ya dawa yanachukia kukubali jeraha lolote. Makampuni ya vyombo vya habari yanakataa upendeleo. Kwa hivyo inaendelea.

Na bado kila mtu mwingine anajua, tayari na zaidi na zaidi.
Ndio maana kupokelewa kwa Mark Zuckerberg wa Facebook kuangaza sana. Sio kile alichokiri. Tayari tulijua alichofichua. Jambo jipya ni kwamba alikubali. Tumezoea kuishi katika ulimwengu unaoogelea katika uongo. Inatushangaza wakati mtu mkuu anapotuambia ukweli au hata sehemu au ukweli kidogo. Karibu hatuwezi kuamini, na tunashangaa ni nini motisha inaweza kuwa.

Katika barua yake kwa wachunguzi wa Congress, alisema kile ambacho kila mtu amekuwa akisema kwa miaka sasa.

Ufanuzi machache. Udhibiti ulianza mapema zaidi kuliko hapo, kutoka Machi 2020 angalau ikiwa sio mapema. Sote tulikumbana nayo, karibu mara moja baada ya kufuli.

Baada ya wiki chache kutumia jukwaa hilo kutoa neno kuonekana, haiwezekani. Facebook mara moja ilifanya makosa na kipande changu kwenye Woodstock na mafua ya 1969 kupitia lakini hawangefanya kosa hilo tena. Kwa sehemu kubwa, kila mpinzani mmoja wa sera mbaya alivurugwa katika viwango vyote.

Madhara ni muhimu zaidi kuliko barua ya Zuckerberg isiyo na damu inavyopendekezwa. Watu mara kwa mara hudharau nguvu ambayo Facebook inayo juu ya akili ya umma. Hii ilikuwa kweli hasa katika mizunguko ya uchaguzi wa 2020 na 2022.

Tofauti ya kuwa na makala ambayo haijashughulikiwa kidogo sana na Facebook katika miaka hii ilikua mara milioni. Wakati makala yangu ilipitia, nilipata kiwango cha trafiki ambacho sijawahi kuona katika kazi yangu. Ilikuwa ya kushangaza. Wakati makala yalipofungwa wiki mbili baadaye - baada ya akaunti za troll zilizolenga kuarifu Facebook kwamba algoriti zimefanya makosa - trafiki ilianguka kwa njia ya kawaida.

Tena, katika kazi yangu yote ya kufuata kwa karibu mifumo ya trafiki ya mtandao, sijawahi kuona kitu kama hiki.
Facebook kama chanzo cha habari kinatoa nguvu kama hatukuwahi kuona hapo awali, haswa kwa sababu watu wengi sana, haswa kati ya watu wanaopiga kura, wanaamini kuwa habari wanayoona ni kutoka kwa marafiki na familia zao na vyanzo wanaamini. Uzoefu wa Facebook na majukwaa mengine uliweka ukweli ambao watu waliamini kuwa ulikuwepo nje yao wenyewe.

Kila mpinzani, na kila mtu wa kawaida ambaye alikuwa na hisia kwamba kitu kisichobaki kikiendelea, alifanywa kuhisi kama aina fulani ya cretin wazimu ambaye alikuwa na maoni ya kupendeza na pengine hatari ambayo hayakuguswa kabisa na tawala.

Je, ina maana gani kwamba Zuckerberg sasa anakiri wazi kwamba alijitenga na maoni yoyote ambayo yanapingana na matakwa ya serikali? Inamaanisha kuwa maoni juu ya kufuli, barakoa, mamlaka ya chanjo - na yote ambayo yanahusishwa na hayo ikiwa ni pamoja na kufungwa kwa kanisa pamoja na madhara ya chanjo - hayakuwa sehemu ya mjadala wa umma.

Tulikuwa tumeishi na tulikuwa tukiishi kupitia mauzo makubwa zaidi ya haki na uhuru wetu katika maisha yetu, au, kwa ubishi, kwenye rekodi ya historia katika suala la ukubwa na mkakati, na haikuwa sehemu ya mjadala wowote mzito wa umma. Zuckerberg alicheza jukumu kubwa katika hili.

Watu kama mimi walikuwa wameamini kwamba watu wa kawaida walikuwa waoga au wajinga kutopinga. Sasa tunajua kwamba hii inaweza kuwa si kweli hata kidogo! Watu waliopinga walinyamazishwa tu!
Wakati wa mizunguko miwili ya uchaguzi, majibu ya Covid hayakuwa ya kucheza kama mabishano ya umma. Hii husaidia kuhesabu kwa nini. Inamaanisha pia kwamba maombi yoyote aliyejaribu kufanya hili suala alishushwa katika suala la kumaliza.

Je, hapa tunazungumzia wangapi? Kwa chaguzi zote za Marekani katika ngazi ya ngazi, jimbo na mitaa, tunazungumza kuhusu maelfu angalau. Kwa kila hali, ambaye alikuwa anazungumza juu ya mashambulio mabaya zaidi dhidi ya uhuru alikuja kunyamazishwa vilivyo.

Mfano mzuri ni mbio za ugavana wa Minnesota mwaka wa 2022 ambazo zilishindwa na Tim Walz, ambaye sasa anagombea nafasi ya VP pamoja na Kamala Harris. Uchaguzi huo ulimshindanisha Walz na mtaalam wa matibabu mwenye ujuzi na sifa ya juu, Dk. Scott Jensen, ambaye ndiye majibu ya Covid kuwa suala la kampeni. Hivi ndivyo jumla ya kura zilivyopangwa.

.
Bila shaka, Dk. Jensen hakuweza kupata mvuto kwenye Facebook, ambayo ilikuwa na ushawishi mkubwa katika uchaguzi huu ambao ilikiri kwamba ilikuwa ikifuata miongozo ya serikali katika kukagua machapisho. Kwa hakika, Facebook ilimpiga marufuku kutangaza kabisa. Ilipunguza wake kwa 90% na labda ikampoteza uchaguzi.
Unaweza kusikiliza akaunti ya Jensen hapa:


Zingatia chaguzi zingine nyingi ziliathiriwa. Inashangaza athari za hii. Ina maana kwamba inawezekana kabisa kizazi cha viongozi waliochaguliwa katika nchi hii hakikuchaguliwa kihalali, ikiwa kwa uhalili tunamaanisha umma wenye ufahamu wa kutosha ambao unapewa chaguo kuhusu masuala yanayohusu maisha yao.

Udhibiti wa Zuckerberg - na hii inahusu Google, Instagram, LinkedIn ya Microsoft, na Twitter 1.0 - ilinyima umma chaguo juu ya suala kuu la kufuli, kuficha uso, na mamlaka ya kupiga risasi, maswala ambayo kimsingi yamesumbua ustaarabu wote na kuweka ustaarabu. njia ya historia kwenye mwendo wa giza.

Na sio Marekani pekee. Haya yote ni mataifa ya kimataifa, ikimaanisha kuwa uchaguzi katika kila nchi nyingine, ulimwenguni kote, uliathiriwa vivyo hivyo. Ilikuwa ni kizuizi cha kimataifa cha upinzani wote kwa sera kali, mbaya, zisizoweza kutekelezeka, zinazoharibu sana sera.

Unapofikiria juu yake kwa njia hii, hii sio tu makosa madogo katika kichwa. Huu ulikuwa mwanzo wa kutisha ambao unapita zaidi ya woga wa mapato. Inapita hata ghiliba za uchaguzi. Ni mapinduzi ya moja kwa moja yaliyokiangusha kizazi cha viongozi waliosimama kidete kupigania uhuru na nafasi yake kuchukuliwa na kizazi cha viongozi waliokubali kutawala kwa wakati ule uliokuwa muhimu zaidi.

Kwa nini Zuckerberg alichagua sasa kutoa tangazo hili na kufichua hadharani mchezo wa ndani? Ni wazi kwamba alisikitishwa na jaribio la mauaji dhidi ya maisha ya Trump, kama alivyosema.

Kisha pia una kukamatwa kwa Ufaransa kwa mwanzilishi na Mkurugenzi wa Telegram Pavel Durov, tukio ambalo hakika linasumbua Mkurugenzi yeyote mkuu wa jukwaa la mawasiliano. Una kukamatwa na kufungwa kwa wengine kama Steve Bannon na wengine wengine.

Pia una kesi ya kudai uhuru wa kujieleza inayoendelea sasa kwa vile RFK, Jr ameidhinishwa kuwa amesimama, akiirudisha kesi ya Missouri v. Biden kwenye Mahakama ya Juu, ambayo iliamua kimakosa mara ya mwisho kukana kusimama mbele ya washtaki wengine.

Zuckerberg wa watu wote anajua vigingi. Anaelewa athari na ukubwa wa tatizo, pamoja na kina cha ufisadi unaofanyika Marekani, EU, Uingereza, na duniani kote. Anaweza kufikiri kwamba kila kitu kitatoka wakati fulani, hivyo anaweza pia kupata mbele ya curve.

Kati ya kampuni zote ulimwenguni ambazo zingekuwa na ushughulikiaji wa kweli juu ya hali ya maoni ya umma hivi sasa, itakuwa Facebook. Wanaona ukubwa wa uungwaji mkono kwa Trump. Na Trump amesema mara nyingi, ikiwa ni pamoja na katika kitabu kipya kilichotoka mapema Septemba, kwamba anaamini Zuckerberg anapaswa kufunguliwa mashitaka kwa jukumu lake la kuchezea matokeo ya uchaguzi. Je, ikiwa, kwa mfano, data yake ya ndani 10 hadi 1 kumuunga mkono Trump juu ya Kamala, ikipingana kabisa na kura ambazo haziaminiki? Hilo pekee lingeweza kutoa hesabu kwa ajili ya mabadiliko yake ya moyo.

Inakuwa ya kusumbua sana kwani mtu ambaye ndiye udhibiti katika Biden White House, Rob Flaherty, sasa anatumika kama Mtaalamu wa Mikakati wa Mawasiliano ya Kidijitali kwa kampeni ya Harris/Walz. Hatuwezi kuwa na swali kwamba DNC inakusudia kupeleka zana zote sawa, mara nyingi zaidi na zenye nguvu zaidi, ikiwa watairudisha Ikulu.

.
"Chini ya uongozi wa Rob," Biden alisema ya kujiuzulu kwa Flaherty, "tumejenga Ofisi kubwa zaidi ya Mkakati wa Dijiti katika historia na, pamoja nayo, mkakati wa kidijitali na utamaduni ambao ulileta watu pamoja badala ya kuwagawanya."

Katika hatua hii, ni salama kudhani kwamba hata mgeni aliye na ufahamu wa kutosha anajua kuhusu 0.5% ya ghiliba nzima, taarifa na njama ambazo zimefanyika katika kipindi cha miaka mia zaidi au zaidi. Wachunguzi wa kesi hiyo wamesema kuwa kuna mamia ya maelfu ya kurasa za ushahidi ambazo hazijainishwa lakini bado hazijafichuliwa kwa umma. yote haya yatamiminika kuanzia mwanzo mpya.

Kwa hiyo, uandikishaji wa Zuckerberg una maana kubwa zaidi kuliko mtu yeyote ambaye bado amekubali.
Inatoa uchunguzi rasmi wa kwanza na uliothibitishwa katika kashfa kubwa zaidi ya nyakati zetu , kunyamazishwa kwa wakosoaji ulimwenguni katika viwango vyote vya jamii, na imani kuchakachua matokeo ya uchaguzi, utamaduni potovu wa umma, kutengwa kwa upinzani, kubatilisha ulinzi wote wa uhuru wa kujieleza. , na mwanga wa gesi kama njia ya maisha ya serikali katika nyakati zetu.

Asante kwa tafsiri,ila inatakiwa ukisha machine translate,unyooshe sasa wewe mwenyewe,na muda huo hakuna,otherwise kunakuwa na upotoshaji sana.Ndio maana na-prefer anayejua Kingereza asome,asiyejua basi,bad luck.

 

[Mathanzua]

Sasa hapo umejiambia mwenyewe maana bado haibadilishi kuwa hatuelewei😃😃

Tunapowashauri muwe mnatuelewa,oh conspiracy theory,mtamalizwa.

 

[Ngurukia]

Tunapowashauri muwe mnatuelewa,oh conspiracy theory,mtamalizwa.

Au sio??😂 Kwahiyo unajikuta Zuckerberg na wewe, eti 'muwe mnatuelewa😂😂😂😂😂we na nani?

 

[Mathanzua]

Au sio??😂 Kwahiyo unajikuta Zuckerberg na wewe, eti 'muwe mnatuelewa😂😂😂😂😂we na nani?

Wana Science indepent wote,sio mimi tu ,walishauri watu wasichanje,unfortunately watu wakaamini udaku.I must admit inasikitisha.

 

[Lycaon pictus]

Tunapowashauri muwe mnatuelewa,oh conspiracy theory,mtamalizwa.

Conspiracy theorist mtakuja kusababisha mauaji makubwa sana ya watu.