Why is Safaricom and IEBC refusing to release this data?

[Dr. Job]

Court to hear Cord's case on poll data Wednesday

Lawyer Jotham Arwa (right) with Homa Bay MP elect Peter Kaluma at Milimani High Court after hearing a petition that seeks to compel the electoral commission and Safaricom Limited to release information for Cord's presidential election petition. PHOTO / PAUL WAWERU

By PAUL OGEMBA pogemba@ke.nationmedia.com
Posted Tuesday, March 12 2013 at 15:03

The High Court will on Wednesday hear a petition by Coalition for Reform and Democracy (Cord) that seeks to compel the electoral commission and Safaricom Limited to release information for its presidential election petition.

Justice Isaac Lenaola certified the petition as urgent. He directed Cord's lawyer to serve Independent Eelectoral and Boundary Commission (IEBC) and Safaricom Ltd with the petition before an inter-parties hearing on Wednesday 8.45 am.

IEBC chairman Isaack Hassan on Saturday declared Jubilee coalition candidate Uhuru Kenyatta the winner of the presidential election. Cord's Raila Odinga, who was second, rejected the results and said he would challenge them in court.

The Constitution allows anyone dissatisfied with the results of a presidential election to challenge them in court within seven days after the announcement of election result.

The suit was filed by Eliud Owalo, head of Cord Presidential Candidate Raila Odinga secretariat, on behalf of the coalition.

Mr Owalo argued that IEBC and Safaricom Limited have refused to release information he intends to use at the Supreme Court despite officially requesting for the same.

He argueses that after the IEBC electronic tallying system collapsed, he is convinced the outcome of the general election announced thereafter was fraudulently manipulated.

"Owing to the failure, I wrote to IEBC on March 8 requesting information and data which was in their possession to be released to me. I did a similar letter to Safaricom Ltd whose services were relied on by IEBC to relay information from all polling stations but they all refused to respond," said Mr Owalo.

He wants a court order directing IEBC to immediately release all forms 34, 35, and 36 from all polling stations and constituencies all over the country in relation to the presidential elections and all the results that were declared electronically at the Bomas Tallying Centre.

He also seeks the log files for all short messages electronically received from Safaricom; software contracts between IEBC and all firms that provided software services to them; serial numbers of all handheld transmission devises and the constituencies they were meant to be used; the Green book; provisional register of all registered voters and the final register of all registered voters.

He further wants Safaricom Ltd compelled to release the numbers of all handheld transmission devices used to transfer data from polling stations to the tallying center; a print out of all messages sent through the devices; all contracts signed with IEBC in connection with the general election and record of information transmitted to the IEBC Server on March 4 and 5.

Mr Owalo argued that he will be unable to challenge the election outcome at the Supreme Court if he does not have the crucial documents that will make it possible to assess the integrity, fairness and transparency of the presidential elections.

"The urgency in the matter is that we have only seven days to file a case at the Supreme Court and if the documents are not availed, our right to access justice will be greatly infringed on," swore Mr Owallo.

He submitted that he is convinced the final presidential election tally was manipulated and it is only through the scrutiny of the documents that the truth will be known.

On Monday, three Cord senators-elect Mutula Kilonzo, James Orengo and Anyang' Nyong'o accused the IEBC of failing to provide them with crucial documents they need to challenge the results of the presidential election.

Court to hear Cord's case on poll data Wednesday - Politics - nation.co.ke

 

[Dr. Job]

Chief Executive Officer
Safaricom Limited
NAIROBI

Dear Sir

RE: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION IN THE POSSESSION AND CUSTODY OF SAFARICOM LIMITED OUR CLIENT – ELIUD OWALLO

Our client is a citizen of Kenya and is registered as a voter in Nairobi within the Republic of Kenya. He exercised his right under Article 38 of the Constitution to participate in the political life of his community as a voter in the just concluded general election. Looking at the results that are now being projected on the screens at the Bomas Tallying Centre, he is convinced that the outcome of the general election has been fraudulently manipulated with the result that his rights under Article 10, 38 and 81 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 have been infringed or are threatened with infringement.

In order to protect his rights aforesaid, from infringement or further infringement, our client urgently requires the following information which are within the power, possession and/or custody of Safaricom Limited.

• (a) The numbers of all handheld transmission devices that were used to electronically transfer date from polling stations to the tallying centre.
  
• (b) Print out of all messages that were sent through all handhled transmissions devices that were used to electronically transfer data from the polling stations.
  
• (c) All contracts signed between Safaricom Limited and Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commision.in connection with the just concluded general election.
  
• (d) Record of all information transmitted to the Safaricom Server on the 4th and 5th days of March 2013.
  

Kindly note that our client is entitled to the information sought hereinabove pursuant to the provisions of Article 35 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 which guarantees the right of access to information held by any person but which is required for the exercise or protection of the fundamental rights and freedoms of another person. Our client is ready and willing to pay the expenses in connection with the processing and or production of the information sought, upon being notified by yourselves of the cost of thereof.

TAKE NOTICE that unless we receive the documents particulars whereof are detailed hereinabove within TWO (2) DAYS from the date hereof, our firm instructions are to institute appropriate proceedings in court seeking appropriate relief without any further reference to you whatsoever and at your own risk as to costs and other consequences arising therefrom.

Yours faithfully
RACHIER & AMOLLO ADVOCATES

 

[Dr. Job]

"A very reliable source working for an institution that was deeply involved in the election process has confirmed that there was massive doctoring of the election results to favour a first round win for Uhuru Kenyatta.

Tons of video evidence and witness statements due to be submitted to the Supreme Court.

The next president of Kenya is yet to be known.

Lets watch the next fourteen days."


DAILY NATION: THE CUTTING EDGE.

 

[Julius Kaisari]

Dr. Job
Uhuru Kenyatta hakuwa na uwezo wa kushinda in round one. NSIS imechakachua details nyingi. Kwanza hata order hii ya kupewa documents particulars imekuja baada ya IEBC na Safaricom kugoma,pia Kuna taarifa kuwa Provincial Commissioners wameamuriwa kuzikusanya forms zote toka kwa Election agents..wanaogopa nini?
Ni umafia tuu wa Uhuru,no more.

 

[Nyani Ngabu]

Uhuru Kenyatta hakuwa na uwezo wa kushinda in round one.

Kwa nini hakuwa na uwezo wa kushinda kwenye duru ya kwanza?

 

[Dr. Job]

Dr. Job
Uhuru Kenyatta hakuwa na uwezo wa kushinda in round one. NSIS imechakachua details nyingi. Kwanza hata order hii ya kupewa documents particulars imekuja baada ya IEBC na Safaricom kugoma,pia Kuna taarifa kuwa Provincial Commissioners wameamuriwa kuzikusanya forms zote toka kwa Election agents..wanaogopa nini?
Ni umafia tuu wa Uhuru,no more.

Thats what people are being made to believe but its contrary to the truth. When CORD gets this information from Safaricom and support from other sources the truth will be too much to handle for some people.

Here is a statement form CORD:

[h=5]CORD PRESS STATEMENT

We would like to draw the country's attention to the following:

1. IEBC is currently running advertisements on media asking Kenyans to accept the results of the elections held last week. We would like to reiterate that the right to petition an election result is constitutionally guaranteed. IEBC as the institution whose deficiencies are subject of such challenges cannot therefore purport to ask the public to accept the election results as that is tantamount to violation of the democratic rights. We demand that the IEBC stop these advertisements forthwith.

2. As CORD prepares to file the petition against the presidential results, our candidate has made concrete assurances to the public that he will respect and uphold the decision of the Supreme Court on this matter. We hereby ask the Jubilee Alliance to issue a similar assurance to Kenyans.

3. We are concerned at attempts by sections of government to create the impression that the election is over and done with. We would like to inform the government, our supporters and Kenyans in general that the process of filing a petition is part and parcel of the election process and urge the government to respect this process and stop any provocative actions that could undermine the process and prevailing peace in the country.

4. Note that the Coalition government is still in place until the next President is sworn in, which will be clear when the petition to be filed within the constitutional timeline has been determined by the Supreme Court.
For

CORD COMMUNICATION TEAM

Hon James Orengo
Hon Mutula Kilonzo[/h]

 

[Julius Kaisari]

Kwa nini hakuwa na uwezo wa kushinda kwenye duru ya kwanza?

There has been alot of Fabrications in the whole process(tallying), planned by Uhuru's team. Just look, shouldn't there be any wrong-doing, why then the IEBC refusing to disclose to public the requested information, non confidential? All those suggests that there is something Fishy by the Authority (NSIS Lead by Kikuyu), take it or not.
Nyongeza Nyani Ngabu,
Jana kwenye thread fulani ulisema ile clip ya Uchakachuaji hukuiamini? Umefatilia wale maafisa wa IEBC walofikishwa Mahakamani jana? Rigging ilikuwepo kaka.

 

[Nyani Ngabu]

There has been alot of Fabrications in the whole process(tallying), planned by Uhuru's team.

Planned by Uhuru's team? Where is the evidence?

Just look, shouldn't there be any wrong-doing, why then the IEBC refusing to disclose to public the requested information, non confidential?

What does the IEBC got to do with team Uhuru? Did team Uhuru create the IEBC?

All those suggests that there is something Fishy by the Authority (NSIS Lead by Kikuyu), take it or not.

This is purely conjectural.

 

[Edzeame]

There has been alot of Fabrications in the whole process(tallying), planned by Uhuru's team. Just look, shouldn't there be any wrong-doing, why then the IEBC refusing to disclose to public the requested information, non confidential? All those suggests that there is something Fishy by the Authority (NSIS Lead by Kikuyu), take it or not.
Nyongeza Nyani Ngabu,
Jana kwenye thread fulani ulisema ile clip ya Uchakachuaji hukuiamini? Umefatilia wale maafisa wa IEBC walofikishwa Mahakamani jana? Rigging ilikuwepo kaka.

unajisumbua bure odinga was floored in a live poll conducted; hawakuelewa ile tyranny of numbers ilvomfavor kenyatta

 

[Dr. Job]

REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CONSTITUTION & JUDICIAL REVIEW DIVISION
PETITION NO. OF 2013

IN THE MATTER OF: ARTICLE 22 (1) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA
AND

IN THE MATTER OF: ALLEGED CONTRAVENTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS UNDER ARTICLES 2 (1), 3 (1) 10 (1) (2), 19 (2), 20 (2), 27 (1), 35 (1), 38(1) (2) & (3), 47 (1) (2), 48, 50 (1)(2), 81 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA 2010
AND

IN THE MATTER OF BREACH OF THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION
BETWEEN
ELIUD OWALO...................…………………………………..……………………PETITIONER
VERSUS

INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL BOUNDARIES
COMMISSION (IEBC)…………………………......... …............….……..1ST RESPONDENT
SAFARICOM LIMITED..............................................................2ND RESPONDENT

PETITION
TO: REGISTRAR
THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
NAIROBI

The Humble Petition of ELIUD OWALLO of P. O. Box care of Rachier and Amollo Advocates 55645-00100 Nairobi in the Republic of Kenya is as follows :-

THE PARTIES

1. The Petitioner is a male adult of sound mind residing and working in Nairobi and a duly registered voter in the general elections held on 4th March 2013. His address of service for purposes of this suit shall be C/o Rachier & Amollo Advocates, Ralphe Bunche Road, Mayfair Centre, 5th Floor, P.O. Box 55645-00200 Nairobi.

2. The 1st Respondent is the Independent Electoral Commission of Kenya duly established under the Constitution of Kenya (Service of summons shall be effected through the Petitioners Advocate's office)

3. The 2nd Respondent is a limited Liability Company duly established under the companies Act Laws of Kenya (Service of summons shall be effected through the Claimant's Advocate's office)

LEGAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE PETITION

4. Article 2(1) of the Constitution of Kenya pronounces the supremacy of the Constitution and provides that the Constitution binds all persons and state organs at both levels of government.

5. Article 3(1) of the constitution states that every person has an obligation to respect, uphold and defend the Constitution.

6. Article 10 of the constitution of the Republic of Kenya sets out the national values and principles of government. Among the national values and principles of governance are rule of law, equity, inclusiveness, equality, human rights, non- discrimination, good governance, transparency and accountability.

7. Article 19 of the Constitution of Kenya asserts that the Bill of rights is an integral part of Kenya's democratic state and is the framework for social, economic and cultural policies and that the purpose of recognizing and protecting human rights and fundamental freedoms.

8. Article 20 states that every person shall enjoy rights and fundamental freedoms in the Bill of rights to the greatest extent consistent with the nature of the right or fundamental freedom.

9. Article 22 of the constitution vests locus standi for the enforcement of the Bill of rights in; among others the petitioner.

10. Article 23 vests authority in this Honourable Court to uphold and enforce the Bill of Rights and highlight some of the remedies that this Honourable Court can grant to uphold and enforce bill of rights.

11. Article 27 of the Constitution provides for equality and freedom from discrimination and in particular provides that every person is equal before the law and has the right to equal protection and equal benefit of the law.

12. Article 28 of the Constitution provides that every person has inherent dignity and the right to have that dignity respected and protected.

13. Article 47 of the Constitution states that every person has the right to administrative action that is expeditious, efficient, lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair.

14. Article 48 of the Constitution states that the state shall ensure access to justice for all persons and, if any fee is required, it shall be reasonable and shall not impede access to justice.

15. Article 258 of the Constitution provides that every person has the right to institute court proceedings, claiming that the constitution has been contravened.

THE FACTS

16. The Petitioner being a registered voter in Nairobi within the Republic of Kenya duly exercised his right as a voter on the 4th of March 2013 and participated in the General Elections in Kenya as enshrined in Article 38 of the Constitution of Kenya.

17. On diverse dates after the said elections, the results of the Elections started streaming in and were projected on screens at the Bomas Tallying Centre.

18. The Petitioner having scrutinized the numbers that were streaming in before the Electronic tallying system collapsed and the results that were announced thereon after is of the strong view that the outcome of the general election has been fraudulently manipulated with the results that his rights under Article 10, 38 and 81 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 have been infringed and or threatened with infringement.

19. Owing to the above, the Petitioner drew a letter to the 1st Respondent on the 8th of March 2013 requesting that several information which were in the power, possession and/or custody of the 1st Respondent be released to him.

20. The documents requested for included the following:

i. All form 34, 35, and 36 from all polling stations and constituencies all over the country in relation to the presidential elections;

ii. All the results that were declared electronically at the Bomas Tallying Centre;

iii. The log files for all short messages that were declared electronically received from Safaricom;

iv. All software contracts between the 1st Respondent and all firms that provided software services to them in connection with the just concluded general elections.

v. Serial numbers of all handheld transmission devises that were actually configured and made ready for use as aforesaid and the constituencies in which they were meant to be used.

vi. Serial numbers of all handheld transmission devises that were configured and the constituencies in which they were meant to be used

vii. The Green book

viii. Provisional register of all registered voters

ix. Final register of all registered voters
​

21. A similar letter was relayed to the 2nd Respondent who's services were relied on by the 1st Respondent to relay information from all polling stations where the following documents were requested for:

i. The numbers of all handheld transmission devices that were used to electronically transfer date from polling stations to the tallying centre.

ii. Print out of all messages that were sent through all handheld transmission devices that were used to electronically transfer data from the polling stations.

iii. All contracts signed between the 1st and 2nd Respondent in connection with the just concluded general election.

iv. Record of all information transmitted to the 2nd Respondent Server on the 4th and 5th days of March 2013.
​

22. The Petitioner relied on his right to information under Article 35 to request for the said documents but the 1st and 2nd Respondent's have ignored his requests despite the Petitioner undertaking to bear all costs and expenses in connection with the processing and production of the information sought, upon being notified of the cost.

23. The notice period issued by the Petitioner was two (2) days which have already expired without any communication from the 1st and 2nd Respondent.

24. The Petitioner wishes to file a Petition at the supreme court to challenge the presidential election process and wishes to rely on the said information being with held by the Respondents.

25. The said petition should be filed within Seven days of the announcement of the results a time which expires on the 16th March 2013.

26. If the said documents are not released to the Petitioner his rights will remain infringed.

VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

27. Violation of Article 10 of the Constitution
The 1st and 2nd Respondent's actions of declining to issue the information sought by the applicant contravened the Principles of good governance, integrity, transparency and accountability.

28. Violation of Article 27 of the Constitution
the 1st and 2nd Respondent attempt to bar the Respondent from accessing information needed to protect his fundamental rights and freedoms is a violation of the Petitioner's right to Equality before the law.

29. Violation of Article 28 of the Constitution.
The 1st and 2nd Respondent's actions of neglecting the Petitioner's plea to avail information are a violation of the Petitioner's right to the Petitioner's human dignity as the same is an abuse of the Petitioner's right to information.

30. Violation of Article 35 of the Constitution
The 1st and 2nd Respondent's action of deliberately refusing/ignoring/neglecting to give requisite documents to the applicant is a violation of the Applicant's right to information as the information is required for enforcement of the Fundamental rights and freedoms of the Petitioner.

31. Violation of Article 47 of the Constitution
The 1st and 2nd Respondent's actions of failing to release the Requisite documents is a violation of the Applicants right to fair Administrative action as the respondents should be barred by the law. .

32. Violation of Article 48 of the Constitution.
The Respondents have barred the Petitioner from accessing information needed in enforcing the Petitioners rights hence they have denied the Petitioners right to Access justice.

PRAYERS

The petitioner therefore humbly asks for the following orders:

a. An order directing the 1st Respondent to release forthwith all the information in their possession that can be used to support the 1st Respondent's claim, as listed herein below:

i. All form 34, 35, and 36 from all polling stations and constituencies all over the country in relation to the presidential elections;

ii. All the results that were declared electronically at the Bomas Tallying Centre;

iii. The log files for all short messages that were declared electronically received from Safaricom;

iv. All software contracts between the 1st Respondent and all firms that provided software services to them in connection with the just concluded general elections.

v. Serial numbers of all handheld transmission devises that were actually configured and made ready for use as aforesaid and the constituencies in which they were meant to be used.

vi. Serial numbers of all handheld transmission devises that were configured and the constituencies in which they were meant to be used

vii. The Green book

viii. Provisional register of all registered voters

ix. Final register of all registered voters
​

b. An order directing the 2nd Respondent to release forthwith all the information in their possession as listed herein below:

i. The numbers of all handheld transmission devices that were used to electronically transfer date from polling stations to the tallying centre.

ii. Print out of all messages that were sent through all handheld transmission devices that were used to electronically transfer data from the polling stations.

iii. All contracts signed between the 1st and 2nd Respondent in connection with the just concluded general election.

iv. Record of all information transmitted to the 2nd Respondent Server on the 4th and 5th days of March 2013.
​

c. Interest on (c), (d), (e) to the proposed claimant.

d. Any other relief that this court may deem fit and just do grant to the proposed plaintiff.

WHICH PETITION is grounded on the Affidavit of ELIUD OWALLO annexed hereto and on such other or further grounds as may be adduced at the Hearing hereof.
Dated this ..........................................day of…….…..….………..…….. 2013

RACHIER & AMOLLO
ADVOCATES FOR THE PETITIONER
DRAWN & FILED BY:
RACHIER & AMOLLO
ADVOCATES
MAYFAIR CENTRE, 5TH FLOOR
RALPHE- BUNCHE ROAD
P O BOX 55645-00200
NAIROBI

TO BE SERVED UPON:

"If the Respondents do not enter an appearance within the time above mentioned such order may be made and proceedings taken as the court may think just and expedient."

 

[Julius Kaisari]

unajisumbua bure odinga was floored in a live poll conducted; hawakuelewa ile tyranny of numbers ilvomfavor kenyatta

Inawezekana tyranny of numbers iliegemea kwa Uhuru,but kuna dukuduku la ushenzi uliofanywa na Jubilee,kwa kushirikiana na NSIS. Subiri mambo yaanikwe mahakamani ndo utajua kuwa MShenzi ni Mshenzi tuu.

 

[Tiba]

Yaani hii ni kichekesho tosha. Kwamba mshtaki anataka mshitakiwa ampe vielelezo ili aweze kuvitumia vielelezo hivyo kumfungulia kesi mahakamani. Sasa kama hawana hivyo vielelezo mkononi, wapi wanasimamia kusema kwamba waliibiwa kura au uchaguzi haukuwa huru?

Tiba

 

[bluetooth]

Ab-Titchaz Dhuks, ukwelikitugani, Tiba, Nyani Ngabu, Kenyan & others

i want to offer you free ticket in this spectacular game, this time crime charges against some individuals within respective institutions instead of election petition

and guess what IEBC is in big shit

 

[Julius Kaisari]

Planned by Uhuru's team? Where is the evidence?



What does the IEBC got to do with team Uhuru? Did team Uhuru create the IEBC?


This is purely conjectural.

Thats why all surmise are going to be proven at the Supreme court. Btw, umejiuliza kwanini ofisi ya umma inakalia nyaraka ambazo hata si siri? kuna nini chini ya Carpet?

 

[Edzeame]

Inawezekana tyranny of numbers iliegemea kwa Uhuru,but kuna dukuduku la ushenzi uliofanywa na Jubilee,kwa kushirikiana na NSIS. Subiri mambo yaanikwe mahakamani ndo utajua kuwa MShenzi ni Mshenzi tuu.

hiyo yote ilikuwa plan yake kuburuza mashirika za kiusalama kwenye mchakato, lakini ukweli ni CORD walikuwa na ma agent wa chama ambao kabla kusalimisha form 34 waliangalia na kupiga saini katika kila kituo cha kupigia kura. nakumbuka wakati wa marehemu kivuitu, yuko moja alijitokeza kimasomaso kuelezea walivokuwa wakichakachua kura. hivi sasa mtu huyo yuko ulaya.

kuna sababu nyingi watu hujihusisha kwenye dukuduku na tetezi za matokeo ya uchaguzi, lakini hivi sasa raila anaungwa mkono na NGOs kumanisha hata makamishona na maagent wa cord walikubali kazi nzuri ilifanywa na IEBC

 

[Tiba]

Thats why all surmise are going to be proven at the Supreme court. Btw, umejiuliza kwanini ofisi ya umma inakalia nyaraka ambazo hata si siri? kuna nini chini ya Carpet?

Mimi nilitarajia CORD watatumia copies za form 34, 35, 36 ambazo zilibaki na mawakala wao vituoni badala ya kuitaka IEBC itoe za kwake. Wao watoe walizo nazo, halafu IEBC itakuja na za kwake kama zilivyowakilishwa na returning officers. Sasa hii ya kutaka tume itoe docs ambazo CORD ndio watazitumia kama ushahidi ainiingii akilini hata kidogo.

Ngoja tusubiri tuone, tusiandikie mate wakati wino upo.

Tiba

 

[Julius Kaisari]

Yaani hii ni kichekesho tosha. Kwamba mshtaki anataka mshitakiwa ampe vielelezo ili aweze kuvitumia vielelezo hivyo kumfungulia kesi mahakamani. Sasa kama hawana hivyo vielelezo mkononi, wapi wanasimamia kusema kwamba waliibiwa kura au uchaguzi haukuwa huru?

Tiba

You are missing a point here Tiba
Unajua anayeshitakiwa kwenye hiyo Pertition ni nani hadi sasa? CORD wamesailisha taarifa ya kusudio pale Supreme court, hawajasema kama wanamshitaki nani na nani...Okay,tujiaminishe kuwa anashitakiwa IEBC (Ofisi ya umma,siyo Jubilee au Cord PEKEE,)ambayo inapaswa kuwa wazi, je Iweje afiche taarifa za Mwenendo wa Uchaguzi? Hatuna uhakika kwa sasa (proof based),lakini tusikatae pia ati hakukuwa na Uhuni.

 

[Tiba]

You are missing a point here Tiba
Unajua anayeshitakiwa kwenye hiyo Pertition ni nani hadi sasa? CORD wamesailisha taarifa ya kusudio pale Supreme court, hawajasema kama wanamshitaki nani na nani...Okay,tujiaminishe kuwa anashitakiwa IEBC (Ofisi ya umma,siyo Jubilee au Cord PEKEE,)ambayo inapaswa kuwa wazi, je Iweje afiche taarifa za Mwenendo wa Uchaguzi? Hatuna uhakika kwa sasa (proof based),lakini tusikatae pia ati hakukuwa na Uhuni.

Mkuu, sijasema na wala sitasema kwamba hakukuwa na uhuni ingawaje hilo sikulishuhudia. It goes without saying kwamba atakayeshtakiwa sio Uhuru wala sio muungano wa Jubilee. Itakayoshtakiwa ni IEBC. Sasa hawa wenzetu wanataka IEBC ndio iwape docs watakazo tumia kufungua kesi! Hapa ndio nasema kuna tatizo, kwa nini wasitumie docs kutoka kwa wakala wao?

Tiba

 

[Communist]

Mmmm, I think this is for Lawyer and engineers (Digital)

 

[Julius Kaisari]

Mkuu, sijasema na wala sitasema kwamba hakukuwa na uhuni ingawaje hilo sikulishuhudia. It goes without saying kwamba atakayeshtakiwa sio Uhuru wala sio muungano wa Jubilee. Itakayoshtakiwa ni IEBC. Sasa hawa wenzetu wanataka IEBC ndio iwape docs watakazo tumia kufungua kesi! Hapa ndio nasema kuna tatizo, kwa nini wasitumie docs kutoka kwa wakala wao?

Tiba

Siyo tu kwamba IEBC inaficha hizo taarifa(kwa makusudi wanayojua) kwa kuwa zitatumiwa kuishtaki, bali hata Raia wa kawaida alipaswa apewe au ziwekwe wazi. Umeelewa ndugu Tiba? Ile si ofisi ya Mtu, ni Public office,na ni Constitutional right ya kupata taarifa (ikiwamo hizo zilizofichwa na IEBC). Hivyo unaweza kuona kuwa kuna mambo yanafichwa, na hivyo kuipa nguvu hoja ya Rigging!!