Why Magufuli administration misses the point on Government splurge

with rental fee keeping rising the tenants perspire to pay them and this 10% rental tax is just another push unto below poverty belt

getting rid of this 10% to all paying Tshs 5mill or less annually as rental fees will do well to shield the poor from dropping further under poverty belt

the freeze of arts teachers' employment in the government is yet to be justified with empirical data

arts subjects are as important as science ones and ostracizing them is myopic

claiming arts teaching positions are full without stating what are the vacancy requirements is foolhardy

I find it difficult to believe there are no retiring arts teachers whose vacancies cry out for filling

I understand there is an overemphasis on science subjects but that should not be achieved by abasing arts subjects the two need each other

you will be surprised to learn our so called science students cannot write quality essays which are necessary to secure scholarships in USA, and as a result our foothold on USA scholarships is minute as a result of this, leaving our science students constrained their access to higher education to non-achieving local universities

specialization paradigms of 1970s are gargantuan failures but our education policymakers seem to still being ensnared and enslaved by them!

unless the injustices inflicted on us in the last election by NEC are fully investigated expect more abuses of human rights to metastasize.

unless the injustices inflicted on us in the last election by NEC are fully investigated expect more abuses of human rights to metastasize.

if squatters are in Ikulu then their legitimacy is nonexistent and they are resorting to sheer force to instill fear of those questioning their legitimacy

so claiming the election is over let us move on is the height of irresponsibility.

I am in now in a position to declare all criminal charges against [HASHTAG]#freemaxencemelo[/HASHTAG] are malicious and unlawful!

the first two charges when read with their particulars are identical meaning the dpp's intent is to sway public opinion that there are serious charges against the accused while there are none!

Far more alarmingly, under section 22 (2) of the cybercrime act no. 14 of 2015 dealt with obstruction of issued orders but the police has no authority to issue those orders but the electronic media authority which has never placed that order against the defendant

so both charge sheets no. 456 and 457 are founded on falsified particulars of charges and a total misconception of the said law. the complainant cannot be the police but the regulator

moreover, charge sheet no. 456 and 457 are raising false allegations about criminal investigations while there is none but frantic efforts of the police to poke their noses where they do not belong

the particulars of offences in charge sheet no. 456 and 457 are too general and unsubstantiated that those charge sheets cannot stand. How can the accused defend himself on arcane allegations flowing from cryptic criminal investigations without names of accused being established and the particulars of their potential infringements categorically stated.

the laws used to justify charge sheet no. 458 are curious too!