Why Magufuli administration misses the point on Government splurge

Why Magufuli administration misses the point on Government splurge

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hahahah.....Our President is not a firefighter and he will never be as you aforesaid.

Back to the topic, before you initiate a certain thing you ought to gear up a comfortable and contributive environment for you and your planned program or project. For instance, when you want to cultivate a virgin land,first you ought to clear the land so as to be easy for you to take other initiatives pertaining your planned project. So,that is what our honor JPM trying to do.
For different reasons not covered in your terse contribution I am parting you on the shoulder.

The problem of Magufuli's doctrine is misdiagnosis of our development paradigms and its consequential dilemmas.

He trust the institutional system and blames the yields of those system to bail himself out. He has no political future unless he acknowledge the problem has never been the players but the playing ground.

Fix the pitch and the players will adjust accordingly!

The cysts he is busier suppurating while pretending to be ghostbuster are not the causes of development ailments but just its effects.

He can change the whole public service manpower but he will never erase greed in our blood.

The place for him to begin is to declare both the Warioba and constituency assembly constitutional efforts were illegal and the ends cannot justify the means, period!


Only then can we count the Magufuli administration among the first in the list of visionary leaders this African continent has ever produced.

By the way economic development never in the hands of the Caesars of the day no matter the deafening decibels to the contrary. Such issues are best determined by the ruled with the rulers of the day providing conduits to the same national aspirations.
 
A lot of the outspoken... you make comment that show how small minded you tend to be. You make comment that reveal ignorance and shallow thinking.! I find the way figures are being presented to be laughably unscientific, and you named them technical data oops!.
Now it is about me and not the burning policy issues at stake?
 
Just because I don't believe your words doesn't mean that I'm either wrong or unintelligent. It simply means that I believe differently and better than you do.

Also, I'm not the one who either can't or won't argue actual points. You are! Your comments consist of regurgitate "vijiweni" blather which you are obviously simply parroting without fact checking and forcing me to accept because I don't buy what you're trying to sell. These are the actions of a null brained and lazy person who failed to challenge with facts.
You conceded the nation is taking the wrong direction but refused to blame ccm but now you have crawled back to personal attacks incongruous with the issues at hand!
 
That's funny. Because based on your own observation I could say the very same thing about those who tends to be like you. The level of sheer dogma and parroting is just mind boggling.
What can I say? Mindboggling is your own manmade... Face the truth and the truth will set you free....embracing lies will only strike you with madness in a form of mindbogglingly distractions
 
This still sounds more like an angry rant rather than a well structural argument. I don't really mind CCM defending their positions because that's an actual function of cohesive apparatus. I do mind you just making unsupported statements.
Double standards in broad daylight robbery of the truth but the truth will break you into shards in due season.
 
I really do not wish to question the performance of this A.G who looks totally incapable to properly advise the government.

There this criminal law to prosecute major graft under new special courts. The law is new aiming to catapult with a political kick those running the show.

There is however a constitutional imperative not to charge the accused on laws which were nonexistent at the time the alleged offences occurred.

The blighting question to the AG or the pretender to that office what kind of advice have you been doling out to your employers?

We understand Escrow gate, ghost salaries gate and other criminal offences are political live wires but why abuse constitutional rights of the accused only to reward your employers with unconstitutional prosecutions which are politically motivated?
In the eyes of law, we call it retrospective legislation. So the law should not be applied retrospectively.
 
In the eyes of law, we call it retrospective legislation. So the law should not be applied retrospectively.
The constitution is very clear on this: Nobody should be criminalized retrospectively for obvious reasons that such laws were not laws at the time the allegations are presumed to have occurred.

One may argue it is rearrangement of courts but the judicial angst is: there were three tier system of courts in pre- special courts laws but now the magistrates tier has been knocked off its perch welcoming expediency at the immaculate altar of injustice!

The right to be properly heard is a constitutional one and quashing such rights for suspects of pre-special courts era is a travesty of justice and nothing less!
 
The Gwajima fiasco reminds all and sundry police in any banana republic like ours is designed to protect the interests of the rulers of the day but not the citizens.

Part of the problem is constitutional one where the president is empowered to appoint whomever he wishes to head the police force and the police force act also empowers the president to appoint senior police cadre.

With this kind of appointing topsy turvy no wonder the police will always cave in to ccm and brutally curb most of dissenters while cavorting with ccm.

Police jamii is only a lip service but with no intent to actualize it where police leadership ought to be answerable to the Augusta House and not to the State House power mongers.
 
The chairman of NEC made interesting hints on legislative reforms he like to make but did not bother to ask us what we really want to see changed there to ensure future elections are above reproach.

For beginners, the retired justice Damian Lubuva is an interested party not only because he is running the electoral show but also because of his demeanour which requires no binoculars to know he is a ccm sidekick.

Lubuva wallowed often on the integrity of our last elections obdurately averring without proof the elections were either free and fair or neither the president nor the NEC has power but ZEC on Zanzibar elections.

Such pronouncements are recklessly dangerous because with UKAWA's tome littered with allegations of electoral frauds and theft gathering dust on his desk one wonders on what grounds he evaluated the sanctity of our elections without dabbling on UKAWA's serious allegations of rigging!

On Zanzibar's election one also is adamant why should Lubuva commenting anything about the president lack of jurisdiction if NEC was an independent institution? Is NEC also running the AG where legal affairs of the government are handled?

Moreover, Lubuva returned money to president in State House showboating his ccm connections while that money came from Treasury. Why return it to state house while it was Treasury who doled it out to NEC?

Far more damaging to Lubuva & Co. is returning the money while there is no infrastructure to register new voters on daily basis but to ambush them few weeks before election putting them unto untold torment and humiliating queque.

No infrastructure is in place to severe colonial links with the corrupt laden local government in running and managing our elections.

I keep wondering is Lubuva really in the know of his job description let alone the loftier ambivalence of one being a judge is it a necessary evil to possess the prerequisite job specifications to boss around the NEC?
 
On TRA we are getting mixed messages on bleeding us to death knell.

One TRA principal in Arusha calls for 15 year records to squeeze unpaid back taxes.

Another TRA spokesman in Dar this morning refutes and contradicts a fifteen year period but anchors for a five year back tax rummage!

The truth is the law permits TRA to hound us with back taxes up to three years. This is keeping apace with a three year mandatory recording keeping.

Records which are more than three years are of no legal consequence! The reason for this is sheer equity the onus is on the TRA and the tax payer to close shop within three years lest anyone be hampered by overburdening cost of record keeping beyond the statutory term of limitation of three years. Record keeping no cheaper and the legislature had no intention of sinking our inchoate businesses with such rendezvous now TRA is brandishing against us despite our long history in tax compliance.

Not knowing the law is no excuse or a scapegoat to harry the hitherto tax compliance ....this tax collection overzealousness is akin of shooting oneself on the knee....
 
What can I say? Mindboggling is your own manmade... Face the truth and the truth will set you free....embracing lies will only strike you with madness in a form of mindbogglingly distractions
Interesting, what kind of truth are you spewing out? I would imagine that any set of ideology doesn't form the mind, as much as the mind forms the ideology.

So what's your political ideology towards the current government?

None the less, ignorance can be cured by learning and retaining what has been learned.

You have to remove detergents inside your brain, then applying said knowledge to better ones.

Stupidity differs in that, no matter what's learned it's seldom applied or worse, I don't want to categorize you in a such group but knowledge itself is cherry picked to conform to ones who pretends to be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom