Why the M-Pesa miracle has failed to work in Nigeria

Geza Ulole

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Posts
65,136
Reaction score
91,917
Why the M-Pesa miracle has failed to work in Nigeria
By
Nairametrics
-
September 26, 2017




Funds transfer in Nigeria has come a very long way. Today, if you want to transfer money to your kid in a University located in another state, all you need to do is open your banking application and punch in the amount, select bank and beneficiary and in seconds the money will get to your child.

The beauty about this is that, you and your child don’t need to have an account in the same bank to ensure that the transfer goes through. You also need not be in the same location or even call anyone to confirm the transaction. Everything is handled in a matter of seconds by the respective banks without having to go through another third party.


Now imagine a world where this wasn’t possible? If you had to transfer funds from your account to your child’s, you would perhaps operate the same bank account instead of separate ones. If you wanted to withdraw money from an ATM, it would have to be the one owned by your bank.Withdrawing from a third-party bank would likely be impossible. This scenario is reality in some African countries today.

M-Pesa is the most popular, no doubt

For a lot of Nigerians looking to start a Fintech company, one of the products often cited as a model for financial inclusion is M-Pesa, the Kenyan mobile money transfer product that has taken the world by storm. M-Pesa allows users to deposit, withdraw, transfer money and pay for goods and services easily with a mobile device.Using a combination of GSM technology and a mobile software application, M-Pesa facilitates sending remittances across the country from one user to another, bypassing the banks. It also relies on an agent network structure that enables users cash money easily without having to visit any bank.
M-Pesa is so successful, it has been viewed as a model for financial inclusion across the world. Such is the popularity of M-Pesa, that several other Startups across Africa have tried to replicate the same model in their home countries. Nigeria is of course not excluded going by the plethora of M-Pesa like products across the country. Unfortunately, none of them have been able to replicate the wonders of M-Pesa despite millions of dollars of venture capital backed investments. The reason why this incredible product can’t be replicated in Nigeria with such success is perhaps due to what you and I as Nigerians enjoy today, the Nigerian Interbank Settlement System (NIBSS).

The NIBSS was introduced in 1992 by the Bankers Committee following the need to introduce a Shared-Service infrastructure for facilitating payments finalities, streamlining Inter-bank payments and settlement mechanisms, and to drive and promote Electronic Payments across the Nigerian Financial Industry. The NIBSS which is owned by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and all licensed Deposit Money Banks in the country, drives collaboration with all Nigerian Banks, Card schemes, Processors, Payment Terminal Service Providers (PTSPs), Mobile Money Operators (MMO), Telecommunication providers and other Payment Service providers to improve adoption of Electronic Payment in Nigeria.

This infrastructure is the reason why you and I can transfer money from one bank to another and receive payment confirmation within seconds. All you need to own is a bank account and a mobile phone. You also do not need have an internet connection on your mobile phone to effect transactions as banks have now introduced USSD applications that facilitate transfers between their customers and recipients, again without having to share the same bank account.

In Nigeria, payment for goods and services is also made possible via an infrastructure gateway provided by Interswitch, a digital payment company that commenced operations in Nigeria in 2002. Interswitch facilitates the electronic circulation of money as well as the exchange of value between people and business, allowing them pay for goods and services over the internet.


Why is this important?

Appreciating the impact of Interswitch and NIBSS in facilitating transfer of funds and payment for transactions in Nigeria can help one understand why the wonders of M-Pesa is yet to be replicated in Nigeria and indeed other countries that share similar payment infrastructure as Nigeria. In fact, Kenya, where M-Pesa originated, until recently, did not have an interbank mobile money transfer platform. Thus, before the advent of M-Pesa, Kenyans could not transfer funds electronically from one bank to the other.
Could this be why M-Pesa has such a strong economic moat in Kenya that is hard to replicate across Africa? We are inclined to believe so, particularly in Nigeria. For any Fintech company to try to replicate the success of M-Pesa in Nigeria, they would have needed to be aided by the absence of an interbank transfer infrastructure and an Interswitch to be dominant and grow exponentially.

Some proponents of agent banking will point to the millions of unbanked Nigerians as a reason to be optimistic that M-Pesa can be replicated in Nigeria. Available data suggest that about 30 million Nigerians are captured and have bank accounts, leaving about 50 million more as unbanked. Therefore, for most of these Fintech Startups, the model has been to focus on the unbanked, hoping that the adoption of an agent networking structure would help attract millions of Nigerians who have apathy to banking services.

Unfortunately, targeting this market segment is expensive and requires a lot of patient capital. Nigerian banks are also not sitting idle, as they have the funds, network and economies of scale to target the unbanked through several equally innovative products that can keep them well within the banking system. The result is a winner-take-all and as things stand, deposit money banks appear well positioned to win this battle.

This in our opinion requires that the agent banking model in Nigeria be completely rethought, with a view to ditching the concept that worked so well in Kenya and Tanzania. Focus, should instead move towards the internet banking space where Startups can still garner significant market share. According to data from the CBN, internet web transactions was about 1.7 million valued at N12 billion in June 2017 compared to POS that’s about 11.2 million valued at N107 billion.

They might as well invest in a business model that can provide an economist of scale that offers agent banking or mobile banking as a part of a network of services that scale on the back of the synergy each product creates. Stand alone services, particularly in Nigeria, have a more precarious path to success. For many start-ups in this space, they will simply die off or remain a drain pipe for venture capital funds.

The bottom line here is that, Startups looking to replicate businesses that have worked so well in other countries, must learn to identify the exogenous factors that may have been the secret to the miracle. Most times, the secret is not what you don’t know but what you have ignored.


Want to know why M-Pesa has not worked in Nigeria? Because its tech has been leapfrogged
 
There would be no Mpesa without the late John Michuki.
When he was acting finance minister in 2008, he saved Mpesa from the banks. The banks had ganged up to have it terminated.
At that time it was transacting about 0.5% of what it transacts today.

Unfortunately, the same government support has not happened in all countries. Case in point Nigeria.
Nigeria has the potential of being the biggest mobile money market, but it is already too fragmented as it stands.
A strong single player is required at the beginning in my opinion.

Michael Joseph looks back at M-Pesa growth seven years later
 
do u understand English? read again whats is written above! since 1992, the Nigerian Interbank Settlement System (NIBSS) exist and with mobile applications u can send money from ur mobilephone to any bank within Nigeria and pay ur bills. then whats the use of Mpesa?
 
Buda news ya 2017 tena..kweli umeishiwa
 
For so many years Banks in kenya acted like shylocks and failed to embrace technology, so mobile money broke that monopoly. But in other countries where banks are not "protected" and favoured by governments, they had long embraced techonogy and payment systems. Thats why MPESA could not work in UK despite being invented there
 
even in most Westernbanks! i wish GoT to break the monopoly of banks!
 

Mpesa/mobile money existed before mobile applications become widespread. In 2007, very few people had banks, and I don't even think Android/ios was invented.
Most phones could only send texts and calls. Therefore that NIBSS has little to do with why Mobile money was not adopted in Nigeria.
In any case, just like Kenya, very few Nigerians had bank accounts to make use of NIBSS.
That NIBSS is the equivalent of Kenya's Pesalink.

Mobile money was invented for the primary purpose of banking the unbanked. Sending money from one person to the other without a bank in the middle.
From that article, NIBSS is not set up like that.
 
peleka ujinga ndo maaana nakuambia soma uelewe kiingereza NIBSS ipo Nigeria toka 1992. Fool don't waste my time
 
Monopoly is not always a bad thing. I don't understand why people think monopoly has no advantages.
mention them!

Fiber optic connection safaricom has 4190 km n been in Kenya since 1997 VS Halotel's over 18000 km in less than 2 years n 90% of the country. mind u Kenya is half the size of Tanzania.

Safaricom eyes northern Kenya in Ethiopia fibre optics deal
FRIDAY, AUGUST 4, 2017 6:00

TECHNICIANS WORK ON FIBRE OPTIC CABLES IN NAKURU. FILE PHOTO | NMG







Safaricom has acquired a 260-kilometre stretch of fibre cable between Marsabit and the border town of Moyale from a regional tech firm as the telco eyes Internet customers in Kenya’s northern frontier.

Mauritius-based Bandwidth and Cloud Services sold the fibre cable to Safaricom for an undisclosed amount and the deal received regulatory approval from the anti-trust last Friday.

The acquisition is also seen as a strategy to provide an additional redundancy route through Ethiopia in the event of outages on the Mombasa undersea cables, Safaricom said.

“We continuously look for means to expand our coverage and find additional fibre routes that will enable our customers have convenient access to more connectivity options,” Safaricom CEO Bob Collymore told the Business Daily.

Also Read


“It gives us enhanced access to additional international routes through Ethiopia for redundancy purposes beyond the international cables landing in Mombasa.”

The acquisition now raises Safaricom’s fibre network to 4,190km — connecting more than 53,000 homes and 1,445 commercial buildings with Internet.

Safaricom’s move to turn to acquisitions marks a change of strategy. The telco in 2013 hired Ericsson and Chinese firm Huawei to build its metro fibre optic cable expected to cover 2,400 kilometres.

Bandwidth and Cloud Services East Africa Ltd –which owns fibre cables across Eastern Africa – said it disposed of the Marsabit-Moyale fibre line because the firm is withdrawing from the Ethiopian market.

“The asset was no longer in line with our strategy as we are withdrawing from the Ethiopian market,” said Yonas Maru, founder and managing director at the firm.

Safaricom eyes northern Kenya in Ethiopia fibre optics deal

vs

Viettel wins clutch of International Business Awards
Update: October, 30/2017 - 21:00
image: http://vietnamnews.vn//images/icon/icon_print.gif


image: http://vietnamnews.vn//images/icon/icon_letter.gif


image: http://image.vietnamnews.vn//upload...elnhangiaithuongStevieAward201763743503PM.jpg


Viettel executives receive Stevie Awards at a ceremony in Barcelona, Spain, last week. -- VNS Photo
Viet Nam News
HCM CITY – Viettel has won one gold and four silver awards at the 2017 International Business Awards - Stevie Awards in various categories and for its operations in various countries.

The Gold Award went to Viettel’s Youtube fee package (in Cambodia, Peru and Tanzania) in the best Entertainment - Communication Product of the Year category.

Within six months of the package’s launch it had garnered over one million customers in the three countries by helping achieve a breakthrough in the consumption of entertainment on smartphones and saving 40 – 80 per cent cost when using data.

The four silver awards were for Fastest-Growing Company of the Year in Europe, Middle East and Africa for Halotel (Tanzania); Most Effective Marketing Campaign of the Year for Bitel (Peru); Best Customer Care Service of the Year for My Viettel application (Việt Nam); and Best Telecommunication Product of the Year for telecommunication secure solution (Việt Nam)

This is the first time that Halotel, Viettel’s Tanzanian operation, has won an international award.

Within three months of launching its mobile service in October 2015 Halotel had signed up one million subscribers, and after nine months doubled the figure, both records that no other international telecom service provider has ever achieved.

Halotel remains one of the fastest growing telecom companies in Tanzania. As of October 2017 it has over 3.5 million customers to rank fourth out of eight telecom companies in the country after surpassing some that have been in the business for over 10 years.

According to the Tanzanian Communication Regulatory Authority, the speed of growth of Halotel’s subscriber numbers in July and August surprised authorities after it signed up a full 50 per cent of the 427,500 new mobile customers.

When the country switched to a system of migrating between networks while retaining the mobile number in March 2017, Halotel attracted the highest proportion of customers wanting to switch, with around 1,000 from other networks joining it every month.

The company has the country’s largest telecom network with 2,500 base-transceiver stations and 18,000 km of optic-fibre cable and covering 90 per cent of the country. It was also the first to set up and provide mobile broadband connections to some 3,000 villages which had never enjoyed internet or mobile services until then.

Tanzania is now Viettel’s biggest overseas market with a population of 55 million and is also where it has made the biggest investment – worth US$800 million. Its investment in Tanzania was considered the best project in 2014 in Eastern, Western and Central Africa at the 2015 Global Investors Conference.

The International Business Awards – Stevie Awards is a leading global award given annually for achievements and contributions by enterprises and individuals that benefit the community, including in information technology and telecommunication.

To win, candidates must persuade 200 examiners, all famous CEOs or entrepreneurs. The name “Stevie” comes from Stephen, which is Greek for “Crowned”. – VNS


Read more at Viettel wins clutch of International Business Awards


nomasana, sam999, NairobiWalker, hbuyosh, msemakweli, simplemind, Kimweri, Bulldog, MK254, Kafrican, Ngongo, Ab_Titchaz, mtanganyika mpya, JokaKuu, Ngongo, Askari Kanzu, Dhuks, Yule-Msee, waltham, mombasite gabriel, Juakali1980, Boda254, mwaswast, MwendaOmo, Iconoclastes, oneflash, Kambalanick, 1 Africa, saadeque, burukenge, nyangau mkenya, Teen-Upperhill Nairobi, kadoda11
 
mention them!
Skip to content

RSS Follow @economicshelp Basket
Home > Micro-economics > Types of market structure > Advantages of monopoly
Advantages of monopoly


Monopolies are generally considered to have disadvantages (higher price, fewer incentives to be efficient). However, monopolies can benefit from economies of scale (lower average costs) and have a greater ability to fund research and development. In certain circumstances, the advantages of monopolies can outweigh their costs.



Advantages of Monopoly
  • Research and development. Monopolies can make supernormal profit, which can be used to fund high-cost capital investment spending. Successful research can be used for improved products and lower costs in the long term. This is important for industries like telecommunications, aeroplane manufacture and pharmaceuticals. Without monopoly power that a patent gives, there may be less development of medical drugs. In developing drugs, there is a high risk of failure; monopoly profits give a firm greater confidence to take risks and fund research which may prove futile.
  • Economies of scale Increased output will lead to a decrease in average costs of production. These can be passed on to consumers in the form of lower prices. See: Economies of Scale This is important for industries with high fixed costs, such as tap water and steel production.




If a monopoly produces at output Q2, average costs (P2) are much lower than if a competitive market had several firms producing at Q1 (P1). This is particularly important for natural monopolies – industries where the most efficient number of firms is one.

  • International competitiveness. A domestic firm may have monopoly power in the domestic country but face effective competition in global markets. E.g. British Steel has a domestic monopoly but faces competition globally. With markets increasingly globalised, it may be necessary for a firm to have a domestic monopoly in order to be competitive internationally
  • Monopolies can be successful firms. A firm may become a monopoly through being efficient and dynamic. A monopoly is thus a sign of success, not inefficiency. For example – Google has gained monopoly power through being regarded as the best firm for search engines. Apple has a degree of monopoly power through successful innovation and being regarded as the best producer of digital goods.
  • Monopoly regulation. One possibility is for a firm to have a monopoly situation, but the government sets up a regulator to prevent the excesses of monopoly power. For example, utilities like water and gas are natural monopolies so it makes sense to have one provider. The regulator can limit price increases and ensure standards of service are met. In theory, this enables the best of both worlds – the monopoly firm can benefit from economies of scale, but the consumer is protected from monopoly prices.
    • However, it depends on the quality of regulation. There is a danger of regulatory capture and the regulator allowing the firm to be too profitable.
    • See also: Regulation of monopoly
  • Subsidise loss-making services. Another potential advantage of a monopoly is that they can use their supernormal profit to subsidise socially useful but loss-making services. For example, a train company can use its monopoly power to set high prices on peak services, but this allows the firm to subsidise unprofitable late-running services on Sat night, which is useful for people going out for the night.
  • Avoid the duplication of services. In some areas, the most efficient number of firms is one. For example, if a city deregulates its bus travel, then rival bus companies may compete for profitable peak-hour services. This may lead to increased congestion as several buses turn up at once. It is more efficient to have a monopoly and avoid this inefficient duplication of services.
Examples of industries where monopoly is the best option
Electricity distribution. To distribute electricity to every home in a country, it is most efficient to have a monopoly provider. There are significant economies of scale in having a comprehensive network. THere is no point in having two electricity cables running up the same street.

Bus travel in a city. Avoids duplication and enables efficient timetabling.

Pharmaceutical drug provision. The promise of a patent on a drug is sufficient to encourage firms to invest in developing new drugs.

Related


View: all Revision Guides


A-Level revision guide
£7.95


AS-Level Revision guide
£4.00


Books by Tejvan Pettinger

Cracking Economics

– A visual guide
- from £6.99


What would Keynes Do?
- from £6.99

The wealth effect
Causes of Wall Street Crash 1929
Microeconomics
Ask a question
Find out more
© copyright EconomicsHelp.org 2016. All rights reserved | Contact | Privacy Policy and Cookies | Site by HappyKite
 
true...the banking industry in other countries like South Africa and Nigeria embraced technology a long time ago, making it easier for users to send money from one person to another (P2P)...for instance, banks in SA have been using electronic fund transfer (EFT) which works almost as well as MPESA...the same goes for the UK and other european nations...this has made MPESA unnecessary in those countries...MPESA thrived in Kenya because our banks' failure to embrace technology and diversify services to users...there was a niche that had to be filled..
 
peleka ujinga ndo maaana nakuambia soma uelewe kiingereza NIBSS ipo Nigeria toka 1992. Fool don't waste my time
that guy has given you a very good explanation,,,just read it again and you will understand...yes NIBBS was existent since 1992 but I want to ask you if apps, smartphones or even GSM technology had reached Nigeria then...I highly doubt it that Nigerian banks have had the technology to send and receive money via mobile phone since 1992...this is recent technology that has only been deployed like a decade ago,...not in the 1990s
 
am also not getting it here. 1992, in Africa, really??? how many people had ever set their eyes on a mobile phone?
 
am also not getting it here. 1992, in Africa, really??? how many people had ever set their eyes on a mobile phone?
u have to know interbanking services have been there for years only coupled with mobileapps has completely removed a chance of Mpesa in Nigeria.
 
Mpesa generally is much more superior product compared with NIBBS, especially in terms of convenience and costs. One can transact without any reference to a bank and is not tied with myriad of regulations. Mpesa agents can be found anywhere even in some shanty trading centers whereby banks wont dare go, therefore its a product worth adopting across the world.
 
true
 
u have to know interbanking services have been there for years only coupled with mobileapps has completely removed a chance of Mpesa in Nigeria.
so there were mobile apps but no mobile phones??😀😀😀 what are you saying?😀😀😀😀in 1992, people still used those phone booths to call their friends and family so I wonder how Nigerians sent money from one phone to another...this is recent technology bana wacha kudanganya watu...banks were and still are not as flexible as MPESA because in order to withdraw you would have to go to a bank...however MPESA is spread across the country, everywhere even in kiosks, making it more accessible than banks
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…