u have to know interbanking services have been there for years only coupled with mobileapps has completely removed a chance of Mpesa in Nigeria.
On those four points which one can Safaricom claims about if was recently acquired by vodacom SA where there is strong competition from MTN, Cell C, and Telkom (Mobile)Skip to content
RSS Follow @economicshelp Basket
Home > Micro-economics > Types of market structure > Advantages of monopoly
Advantages of monopoly
Monopolies are generally considered to have disadvantages (higher price, fewer incentives to be efficient). However, monopolies can benefit from economies of scale (lower average costs) and have a greater ability to fund research and development. In certain circumstances, the advantages of monopolies can outweigh their costs.
Advantages of Monopoly
- Research and development. Monopolies can make supernormal profit, which can be used to fund high-cost capital investment spending. Successful research can be used for improved products and lower costs in the long term. This is important for industries like telecommunications, aeroplane manufacture and pharmaceuticals. Without monopoly power that a patent gives, there may be less development of medical drugs. In developing drugs, there is a high risk of failure; monopoly profits give a firm greater confidence to take risks and fund research which may prove futile.
- Economies of scale Increased output will lead to a decrease in average costs of production. These can be passed on to consumers in the form of lower prices. See: Economies of Scale This is important for industries with high fixed costs, such as tap water and steel production.
If a monopoly produces at output Q2, average costs (P2) are much lower than if a competitive market had several firms producing at Q1 (P1). This is particularly important for natural monopolies – industries where the most efficient number of firms is one.
Examples of industries where monopoly is the best option
- International competitiveness. A domestic firm may have monopoly power in the domestic country but face effective competition in global markets. E.g. British Steel has a domestic monopoly but faces competition globally. With markets increasingly globalised, it may be necessary for a firm to have a domestic monopoly in order to be competitive internationally
- Monopolies can be successful firms. A firm may become a monopoly through being efficient and dynamic. A monopoly is thus a sign of success, not inefficiency. For example – Google has gained monopoly power through being regarded as the best firm for search engines. Apple has a degree of monopoly power through successful innovation and being regarded as the best producer of digital goods.
- Monopoly regulation. One possibility is for a firm to have a monopoly situation, but the government sets up a regulator to prevent the excesses of monopoly power. For example, utilities like water and gas are natural monopolies so it makes sense to have one provider. The regulator can limit price increases and ensure standards of service are met. In theory, this enables the best of both worlds – the monopoly firm can benefit from economies of scale, but the consumer is protected from monopoly prices.
- However, it depends on the quality of regulation. There is a danger of regulatory capture and the regulator allowing the firm to be too profitable.
- See also: Regulation of monopoly
- Subsidise loss-making services. Another potential advantage of a monopoly is that they can use their supernormal profit to subsidise socially useful but loss-making services. For example, a train company can use its monopoly power to set high prices on peak services, but this allows the firm to subsidise unprofitable late-running services on Sat night, which is useful for people going out for the night.
- Avoid the duplication of services. In some areas, the most efficient number of firms is one. For example, if a city deregulates its bus travel, then rival bus companies may compete for profitable peak-hour services. This may lead to increased congestion as several buses turn up at once. It is more efficient to have a monopoly and avoid this inefficient duplication of services.
Electricity distribution. To distribute electricity to every home in a country, it is most efficient to have a monopoly provider. There are significant economies of scale in having a comprehensive network. THere is no point in having two electricity cables running up the same street.
Bus travel in a city. Avoids duplication and enables efficient timetabling.
Pharmaceutical drug provision. The promise of a patent on a drug is sufficient to encourage firms to invest in developing new drugs.
Related
View: all Revision Guides
A-Level revision guide£7.95
AS-Level Revision guide£4.00
Books by Tejvan Pettinger
Cracking Economics
– A visual guide
- from £6.99
What would Keynes Do?
- from £6.99
The wealth effect
Causes of Wall Street Crash 1929
Microeconomics
Ask a question
Find out more
© copyright EconomicsHelp.org 2016. All rights reserved | Contact | Privacy Policy and Cookies | Site by HappyKite
bring evidence! BTW 30% of over 150 mln people in Nigeria is bigger than 95% of 45 million Kenyans!Interbanking services in a country where only a handful had bank accounts is of no use.
Mpesa was invented for the unbanked, before it involved into the payment juggernaut it is today.
In 2007, probably 70% of Nigerians had no bank accounts, hence NIBSS was of no importance to them.
And even today, a huge % of Nigerians cannot quickly access a bank account or ATM.
Monopoly has never work in the best interest of the customer.Monopoly is not always a bad thing. I don't understand why people think monopoly has no advantages.
the kind of stupidity u expose urself! God knows! fool read again what i wrote n get the meaning if at all u not having Autism! stop trolling...so there were mobile apps but no mobile phones??😀😀😀 what are you saying?😀😀😀😀in 1992, people still used those phone booths to call their friends and family so I wonder how Nigerians sent money from one phone to another...this is recent technology bana wacha kudanganya watu...banks were and still are not as flexible as MPESA because in order to withdraw you would have to go to a bank...however MPESA is spread across the country, everywhere even in kiosks, making it more accessible than banks
😀😀😀no chills man...just debating here😀😀😀relaxthe kind of stupidity u expose urself! God knows! fool read again what i wrote n get the meaning if at all u not having Autism! stop trolling...
what debate fool? do i have to teach u the meaning of what i wrote?😀😀😀no chills man...just debating here😀😀😀relax
bring evidence! BTW 30% of over 150 mln people in Nigeria is bigger than 95% of 45 million Kenyans!
Who said so. You?Monopoly has never work in the best interest of the customer.
What is wrong with you? Tingisha kichwa uhisi kama ubongo bado uko. Eti "Mpesa needs to go all the way to the man in the village." Unajua Mpesa is the only financial product yenye imefika vijijini na vitongojini kote. Hata Turkana Mpesa iko. Pengine Tanzania ndio Mpesa haijafika vijijini.Mpesa as it is stuck in the past, it needs to venture into cashless model all the way to the little man in the village.
Calm down. Hujui wewe ndio mzee wa nyumba. Ukiharibu sura nyumba haitakalika.what debate fool? do i have to teach u the meaning of what i wrote?
Yeah but it needs to adapted full 100% cashless. What is the point of agent in 2018? Creating jobs, cashless can double number of jobs in the economy with minimal risk of loss and corruption.What is wrong with you? Tingisha kichwa uhisi kama ubongo bado uko. Eti "Mpesa needs to go all the way to the man in the village." Unajua Mpesa is the only financial product yenye imefika vijijini na vitongojini kote. Hata Turkana Mpesa iko. Pengine Tanzania ndio Mpesa haijafika vijijini.
Monopoly gives you power over something or group of people very easy to abuse it.Who said so. You?
Nigeria simply has not had the political will to invest in mobile money.. nothing else... A country like SA does not need mobile money, but Nigeria !@#$#!!!u have to know interbanking services have been there for years only coupled with mobileapps has completely removed a chance of Mpesa in Nigeria.
in what way is a bank more cashless than mobile money?Yeah but it needs to adapted full 100% cashless. What is the point of agent in 2018? Creating jobs, cashless can double number of jobs in the economy with minimal risk of loss and corruption.
Yeah, but Mpesa is not the only solution. There more solutions out there including NFC and QR code which is "very very" popular in China today. And why were still talking about ATM 2018 the world has move on.Nigeria simply has not had the political will to invest in mobile money.. nothing else... A country like SA does not need mobile money, but Nigeria !@#$#!!!
1. Nigeria has an adult with no bank accounts numbering 60 million.... thats more than the entire population of kenya if you count even those born today....
2. Kenya adopted inter bank transfere yet mpesa still prefered.
3. kenya has more ATMs per squaremile or per 100k people than nigeria..
4. Kenya has a bigger % of her population using banks than Nigeria.. but still Mpesa rules..