6 reasons why the Supreme Court of Kenya rendered a bad ruling.

[Dhuks]

Everybody knows the truth, and that is your tribal chieftain did not win the elections in a fair fight. I have no need to wait for a judgement that was dictated to the judges under intimidation.

Everybody in this case meaning the believers of the dogma of there can be no free and fair elections unless Raila wins. Dont worry,we will elect your man soon when the icc rears its head.

 

[Zipapa zipapa]

Agwambo can't win an election in the current circumstances in Kenya where voters base on ethnic line. In fact I agree with Mutahi Ngunyi who earlier predicted on Agwambo 's downfall based on tyranny of numbers. Wajaluo mlilala wakati wenzenu wa kikuyu na wakalenjin wakijiandikisha kupiga kura kwa wingi. Next time Agwambo but I guess it will take long time before Kikuyus succumb totally and let a luo kid in the state house.

 

[Emkei]

You need to cut your obsession with me coz at this rate you might start experiencing sleepless nights accompanied by nightmares. Im not here to defend Raila as you try to point out spelling mistakes not withstanding. I'm not speaking on behalf of Raila but for the sake of posterity and the millions of Kenyans who feel disenfranchised by the sham elections.

Finally if you took time to read the article in totality you would realize that these are words of one George Ayittey. You are not a serious guy to engage in debating Kenyan affairs if you really wanted to know.

Make weird "ego pampering" allegations then shoot down anybody who doesn't join you in your kumbayah chorus!!:nono:
Kenyans have moved on. No more vitendawili and half carpet, vip toilet shenanigans. You must be an avid student of
Hitler's man J. Goebbels gospel..["If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth. " Joseph Goebbels]

 

[zuri]

Zipapa i dont think it is about Luo's but one Luo called Ondinga he just makes Kikuyus shake in their boots. 50.7 people decided they wanted Uhuru and cant understand why they are still complaining when democracy is about the person who wins whether by 1 vote or 1 million votes.

 

[toxic]

This issue Only God knows better what really happened,I've left all in His hands to judge,but telling from series of events surrounding that election from casting of votes,to the tallying exercise up to the Supreme Court,one could easily arrive to the conclusion that the election was neither fair nor free.Well,it is something to do with God now,let it stand the way it is now.

 

[Ambiente Guru]

Vyombo vya habari Kenya vimeripoti kuwa "MAWAKILI nchini wamekosoa uamuzi wa Mahakama ya Juu wa kukataa hati ya kiapo iliyokuwa na ushahidi uliodaiwa kufichua dosari za uchaguzi katika kesi ya kupinga ushindi wa Rais Mteule Uhuru Kenyatta" (kwa mujibu wa SwahiliHub).

Wakati huo huo Wabunge wamekusudia kuwafuta kazi Majaji waliokazia ushindi wa Uhuru kwa msingi wa wote sita kwa sawia kutokubaliana na mapingamizi/kesi ilizofunguliwa na hivyo kushindwa kuwaelewesha WaKenya ni makosa gani na kwa kiwango gani yanayoweza kufuta ushindi batili wa wa Raisi. Hii ni kwa mujibu wa gazeti la Daily Nation.

 

[timbilimu]

Siasa za hovyo kabisa,unachafua washindani wako na taasisi za umma kwa maslahi yako na uroho wa madaraka.

 

[Dhuks]

Judges are not at the mercy of cord mps since they dont have the numbers in parliament and even if they had removing them isn't that easy.

(1) A judge of a superior court may be removed from office only on the grounds of--

(a) inability to perform the functions of office arising from mental or physical incapacity;
(b) a breach of a code of conduct prescribed for judges of the superior courts by an Act of Parliament;
(c) bankruptcy;
(d) incompetence; or
(e) gross misconduct or misbehaviour.
(2) The removal of a judge may be initiated only by the Judicial Service Commission acting on its own motion, or on the petition of any person to the Judicial Service Commission.
(3) A petition by a person to the Judicial Service Commission under clause (2) shall be in writing, setting out the alleged facts constituting the grounds for the judges removal.
(4) The Judicial Service Commission shall consider the petition and, if it is satisfied that the petition discloses a ground for removal under clause (1), send the petition to the President.
(5) The President shall, within fourteen days after receiving the petition, suspend the judge from office and, acting in accordance with the recommendation of the Judicial Service Commission--
(a) in the case of the Chief Justice, appoint a tribunal consisting of--
(i) the Speaker of the National Assembly, as chairperson;
(ii) three superior court judges from common-law jurisdictions;
(iii) one advocate of fifteen years standing; and
(iv) two other persons with experience in public affairs; or
(b) in the case of a judge other than the Chief Justice, appoint a tribunal consisting of--
(i) a chairperson and three other members from among persons who hold or have held office as a judge of a superior court, or who are qualified to be appointed as such but who, in either case, have not been members of the Judicial Service Commission at any time within the immediately preceding three years;
(ii) one advocate of fifteen years standing; and
(iii) two other persons with experience in public affairs.
(6) Despite Article 160 (4), the remuneration and benefits payable to a judge who is suspended from office under clause (5) shall be adjusted to one half until such time as the judge is removed from, or reinstated in, office.
(7) A tribunal appointed under clause (5) shall--
(a) be responsible for the regulation of its proceedings, subject to any legislation contemplated in clause (10);
and
(b) inquire into the matter expeditiously and report on the facts and make binding recommendations to the President.
(8) A judge who is aggrieved by a decision of the tribunal under this Article may appeal against the decision to the Supreme Court, within ten days after the tribunal makes its recommendations.
(9) The President shall act in accordance with the recommendations made by the tribunal on the later of --
(a) the expiry of the time allowed for an appeal under clause (8), if no such appeal is taken; or
(b) the completion of all rights of appeal in any proceedings allowed for under clause (8), if such an appeal is taken and the final order in the matter affirms the tribunal's recommendations.

(10) Parliament shall enact legislation providing for the procedure of a tribunal appointed under this Article.

 

[Ab-Titchaz]

Judges are not at the mercy of cord mps since they dont have the numbers in parliament and even if they had removing them isn't that easy.

Dhuks,

this report is from LSK and not CORD MPs as you are trying alledge. Lets be constructive in this criticism even as people try to move on....whatever that means. Here is the full article from the DN which the thread starter did not include in his initial post:


Lawyers criticise court decision

Kenya's Chief Justice Willy Mutunga (3rdL) heading a six-judge bench of the country's Supreme court, presides on March 25, 2013 over the hearing of a petition challenging the outcome of the General Election of March 4. Photo/FILE NATION MEDIA GROUP

By PETER LEFTIE pmutibo@ke.nationmedia.com
Posted Tuesday, April 2 2013 at 23:30

In Summary

• Advocates say affidavit with evidence of alleged malpractices should not have been thrown out

Lawyers have criticised a Supreme Court decision to reject an affidavit with evidence of alleged electoral malpractices in the petition challenging President-elect Uhuru Kenyatta's victory.

Law Society of Kenya (LSK) chairman Eric Mutua said on Tuesday the decision by the highest court in the land to reject the affidavit on the grounds that it was time-barred will undermine reforms in the Judiciary.

Mr Mutua said the Supreme Court should have considered the affidavit on its own merits instead of rejecting it on technicalities.

"The Chief Justice and President of the Supreme Court, Justice Willy Mutunga has time and again reminded lawyers that the era of reliance on procedural technicalities is gone," Mr Mutua said.

During the pre-trial conference, which preceded the hearing of the landmark petition filed by Cord presidential candidate Raila Odinga, the six-judge bench rejected an affidavit filed by the PM, saying it was time-barred.

The judges further said that the affidavit which contained evidence of alleged electoral fraud in 122 constituencies had been filed without the court's leave.

Mr Mutua argued that the rules of procedure in the reformed Judiciary placed emphasis on merits of applications, not procedural technicalities.

Mr Odinga's petition was dismissed by the Supreme Court in a judgment delivered on Saturday.

In the summary of the judgment, the judges declared that the March 4 election was conducted in a free and fair manner and that Mr Kenyatta and his running mate, Mr William Ruto, had been validly elected president and deputy president, respectively.

But in his statement, Mr Mutua warned that the court's decision to reject the affidavit by Mr Odinga could set a dangerous precedent where courts would latch onto technicalities to reject evidence."I see some lawyers taking advantage of this decision to return us to the era of litigating by advancing arguments of a technical nature," he warned.

He challenged the Supreme Court to explain its decision to forestall a situation where the courts could resort to rejecting cases on technicalities.

"In the meantime, and in order to promote the good practise of law, I urge our members to exercise ‘bar restraint' in citing this decision from the Supreme Court," he said.

Lawyers criticise court decision - Politics - nation.co.ke

 

[Koborer]

Vyombo vya habari Kenya vimeripoti kuwa "MAWAKILI nchini wamekosoa uamuzi wa Mahakama ya Juu wa kukataa hati ya kiapo iliyokuwa na ushahidi uliodaiwa kufichua dosari za uchaguzi katika kesi ya kupinga ushindi wa Rais Mteule Uhuru Kenyatta" (kwa mujibu wa SwahiliHub).

Wakati huo huo Wabunge wamekusudia kuwafuta kazi Majaji waliokazia ushindi wa Uhuru kwa msingi wa wote sita kwa sawia kutokubaliana na pingamizi la CORD na hivyo kushindwa kuwaelewesha WaKenya k ni makosa gani na kwa kiwango gani yanayoweza kufuta ushindi batili wa wa Raisi. Hii ni kwa mujibu wa gazeti la Daily Nation.

Too late, this won't change anything now. The courts ruling was final as per the law.

 

[Awo]

Too late, this won't change anything now. The courts ruling was final as per the law.

Who said it was going to change anything?

 

[Dhuks]

Ab-Titchaz we are reading from a different script

Nyakach MP Aduma Owuor has said he will introduce a bill to send all Supreme Court Judges home immediately Parliament reconvenes.


He said the Judges failed to honour the trust that Kenyans bestowed on them in their last week's judgment on the presidential petition.

"My first bill in parliament will seek to send the judges home because they disappointed Kenyans. I know as Cord we are fewer than our opponents in the house but we will fight hard to ensure the bill goes through," he said.

Mr Owuor argued that the discrepancies discovered in the 22 polling stations whose votes were re-tallied should have raised concern to the Judges that there could have been similar discrepancies in other stations countrywide.

more here

 

[Koborer]

Too late, this won't change anything now. The courts ruling was final as per the law.

@ Awo,

Nobody, but what is the point of LSK?

 

[mwitaz]

I have selected this,,,because i find it,,the most funniest of all,,of the above.

So a run off was the best solution,,,according to you.

But what i understand was that,,,the supreme court's main agenda was
to find out whether,,,if,, Uhuru Kenyatta was elected fairly

It seems you didn't follow Pre Trial and Trials which was open and transparent because everybody followed through Television all over the World.
Just read hear:-
1. ALLEGATION: The
Voters Register grew by
85,000. from
14,337,399.00 to
14,352,533
FACT: The voter registration as at 18th
December 2012 was
14,337,399.00 and from
the data published by
IEBC on summary of
Registered voters are 14,349,896 a growth of a
paltry 12,497 votes.
2. ALLEGATION: That IEBC
removed 20,000 voters
from the register due to
double entry resulting to voters register reducing to
14,269,752.
FACT: Simple addition and
subtraction mathematics
of 14,337,399 - 20,000 =
14,317,399 and not 14,269,752. in addition
CORD should be cognizant
of the fact that the voters
register was opened for
inspection to the public
for one month to correct any anomalies.... and it
was discovered most pple
in west pokot, turkana,
wajir etc had not been
captured in the BVR
register but were in the manual black book. This
exercise was carried for
one month and the
anomalies leading to the
addition and subtraction
in all areas the net effect yielding a net addition of
12,497 voters. looking at
the affected areas county
wise the leading areas
where votes were added
were are TURKANA (12,540),WEST POKOT
(+13,092),TRANS NZOIA
(+13,288) and many
others in no pattern
whatsover. its worth
noting Turkana and Tranzoia were ODM
strongholds. Also in most
counties voters reduced
the most affected being
Nairobi (-50,102), Kajiado
(-10,707),HOMABAY (-5,872), MURANGA
(-4,211) and many others
with no pattern at all. the
only pattern you can tell
is that areas which are
generally under developed had generally
addition of voters and
areas which are fairly
urban and developed had
there voters generally
reduced. The logic of CORD indicating that their
voters were reduced and
those of Uhuru is actually
looking at the data i have
uploaded is to say the least
the reasoning of the absurd bordering on hate
speech. CORD new that
legally IEBC had one
month to open the Voters
Register to the public for
scrutiny for purposes of correction of omissions
and removal of
duplicates. unless CORD
is of the view that it was
an illegality to clean the
register i have no idea why they should be
raising issues with the
Voters Register.
In my own assessment
CORD having noticed that
even in a repeat poll they are going to loose, they
want the Supreme court
to condemn the register
so that registration can
begin afresh hoping to
encourage there supporters to register in
large numbers.
County 18TH REG.4TH
REG CAST DIFF B-C DIFF
B-DDIFF B-DTURNOUT
MOMBASA 412602 408,747 272,318 -3,855
140,284 136,429 66.62%
KWALE 173447 174,443
125,601 996 47,846
48,842 72.00% KILIFI
340948 336,132 218,174 -4,816 122,774
117,958 64.91%
TANA RIVER 73037 79,454
64,589 6,417 8,448 14,865
81.29% LAMU 51830
52,346 44,171 516 7,659 8,175
84.38%
TAITA TAVETA 112219
113,862 92,356 1,643
19,863 21,506 81.11%
GARISSA 116166 115,202 91,900 -964 24,266 23,302
79.77%
WAJIR 110286 118,091
100,239 7,805 10,047
17,852 84.88% MANDERA
121005 120,768 101,617 -237
19,388 19,151 84.14%
MARSABIT 104408
104,615 89,882 207
14,526 14,733 85.92%
ISIOLO 52617 54,462 47,646 1,845 4,971 6,816
87.48%
MERU 483517 487,265
429,819 3,748 53,698
57,446 88.21% THARAKA
155823 155,487 138,984 -336 16,839
16,503 89.39%
EMBU 226989 227,286
199,645 297 27,344
27,641 87.84% KITUI
323624 324,673 276,104 1,049 47,520
48,569 85.04%
MACHAKOS 445819
445,096 372,078 -723
73,741 73,018 83.59%
MAKUEN 300086 298,221 252,223 -1,865 47,863
45,998 84.58%
NYANDARUA 252889
255,984 239,747 3,095
13,142 16,237 93.66%
NYERI 357105 356,380 331,024 -725 26,081
25,356 92.89%
KIRINYAGA 262715
265,290 241,548 2,575
21,167 23,742 91.05%
MURANGA 457052 452,841 423,635 -4,211
33,417 29,206 93.55%
KIAMBU 860716 861,828
781,735 1,112 78,981
80,093 90.71% TURKANA
120345 132,885 101,284 12,540 19,061
31,601 76.22%
SAMBURU 56662 61,114
53,949 4,452 2,713 7,165
88.28% TRANS NZOIA
231352 244,640 199,947 13,288
31,405 44,693 81.73%
WEST POKOT 107894
120,986 108,783 13,092
-889 12,203 89.91% UASIN
GISHU 318717 330,618 284,728 11,901
33,989 45,890 86.12%
ELGEYO - MAR 134290
134,568 123,474 278
10,816 11,094 91.76%
NANDI 254788 263,254 236,242 8,466 18,546
27,012 89.74%
BARINGO 171013 173,653
157,494 2,640 13,519
16,159 90.69% LAIKIPIA
170267 173,905 156,868 3,638 13,399
17,037 90.20%
NAKURU 695879 695,319
616,318 -560 79,561
79,001 88.64% KERICHO
290102 290,458 262,902 356 27,200
27,556 90.51%
BOMET 254405 252,358
227,115 -2,047 27,290
25,243 90.00% NAROK
253086 262,739 235,906 9,653 17,180
26,833 89.79%
KAJIADO 315053 304,346
265,185 -10,707 49,868
39,161 87.13% KAKAMEGA
568813 567,460 474,779 -1,353
94,034 92,681 83.67%
VIHIGA 202456 202,822
167,573 366 34,883
35,249 82.62% BUNGOMA
411981 410,462 351,005 -1,519
60,976 59,457 85.51%
BUSIA 251737 251,305
220,928 -432 30,809
30,377 87.91% SIAYA
312518 311,919 288,447 -599 24,071
23,472 92.47%
KISUMU 388729 385,820
348,969 -2,909 39,760
36,851 90.45% HOMABAY
331698 325,826 306,720 -5,872
24,978 19,106 94.14%
MIGORI 287702 283,862
261,215 -3,840 26,487
22,647 92.02% KISII
414493 412,945 348,662 -1,548 65,831
64,283 84.43%
NYAMIRA 219616 219,358
183,509 -258 36,107
35,849 83.66% NAIROBI
1778903 1,728,801 1,410,663
-50,102 368,240 318,138
81.60%
Totals 14,337,399
14,349,896 12,327,700
12,497 2,009,699 2,022,196 85.91%
3. Allegation: That the
following constituencies
Tiaty,laisamis,igembe
central,
Buri,Chuka,Lari,Kapenguria,Saboti,Turbo,Marakwet West,Bomet East, Mt.
Elgon, Langata and Aldai
had the total votes cast
exceeding the registered
voters. Fact: I have painfully
analysed all this connstituencis using the
provisional register of
18th December 2012 and
the register used on 4th
march 2013 and found
out in all cases there is no constituency from the
above that had total votes
cast exceeding the
registered. This begs the
question why should a
lawyer make an allegation that knows very well that
it is false and the media
dont even countercheck
on the veracity of
information given. this
allegation falls flat and should be dismissed with
costs
B C D
Constituency REG.18th
REG.4TH CAST B-D C-D
allegation D>B Allegation D>C
TIATY 19,960 20,469
17,950 2,010 2,519 -509
FALSE FALSE LAISAM. 20,998
21,315
17,503 3,495 3,812 -317 FALSE FALSE
IGEMBE c. 53,128 56,111
49,358 3,770 6,753 -2,983
FALSE FALSE BUURI 54,243
54,501
47,766 6,477 6,735 -258 FALSE FALSE
CHUKA 56,821 57,231
50,506 6,315 6,725 -410
FALSE FALSE Lari 58,984
59,001 56,666
2,318 2,335 -17 FALSE FALSE
Kapenguria 37,099 41,328
36,266 833 5,062 -4,229
FALSE FALSE Saboti 53,811
55,791
45,978 7,833 9,813 -1,980 FALSE FALSE
Turbo 87,108 87,332
73,434 13,674 13,898 -224
FALSE FALSE Marakwet. W
39,311
36,055 32,729 6,582 3,326 3,256 FALSE FALSE
Bomet E. 41,487 41,009
37,364 4,123 3,645 478
FALSE FALSE Mt. Elgon
50,972 49,387
44,419 6,553 4,968 1,585 FALSE FALSE
Langata 98,733 96,670
80,680 18,053 15,990
2,063 FALSE FALSE Aldai
48,907 49,901
45,779 3,128 4,122 -994 FALSE FALSE
4. Allegation: Form 36
were used used although
they were not signed. Fact:
Form 36 in
aggregation of form 34. if form 34 are signed then
the only mandatory fact is
to confirm that the
figures in form 34 have
been transferred correctly
to form 36. 5. Allegation: That IEBC
allowed Kencall to host
both TNA and IEBC Data
hence TNA had access to
IEBC Server and messed
up the data Fact: This is where analog
now comes into pay. its
like saying since uhuru
has a yahoo account then if
raila has also a yahoo
account then uhuru can get access to raila data.
Kencall is a company
offering hosting and
connectivity services to
anyone even cord is they
want to host there server or web services there.
even if you give any iota
of truth to CORD
allegation, voting went
manual and the issue of
server does not arise. Summary:
The other allegations
involve physical
documents which I am not
privy to but from the
lies so far adduced b4 the supreme court. this suit
should be dismissed with
costs.
And this Britain and US
Puppets (Kiai, Haron
Ndubi, Makau Mutua, Githongo) they need to
spend their time in ICC
Cells for manufacturing
and Coaching witnesses
some of them perennial
conmen like Kabuti (Witness No. 4) who one
day pretended in a
Crusade that he was lame
only to walk again, how
much the pastor paid him
God know·

 

[Ab-Titchaz]

@ Awo,

Nobody, but what is the point of LSK?

They are simply doing a mop up exercise because they no better that this thing is over with.

 

[Ab-Titchaz]

Ab-Titchaz we are reading from a different script

more here

Evidently we are.

That is a whole different script from what is being talked about in this thread. This thread is about LSK commenting
on the SCoK decision different from the one where the CORD affiliated MP is talking about tryna get the SCoK fired...which is something that is dead in the water...before even arrival.

That piece you are posting up there is embedded in this thread https://www.jamiiforums.com/kenyan-...eme-court-of-kenya-rendered-a-bad-ruling.html

Kwa ufupi what Im hoping you would do is hit out at the LSK in this thread and if you wanna pound on the
CORD MPs then go the thread above.

Hio tu.

 

[Dhuks]

Ah now i get your concern but you also seem to have overlooked the op second paragraph. Apologies.

 

[Jammu Africa]

Wakati huo huo Wabunge wamekusudia kuwafuta kazi Majaji waliokazia ushindi wa Uhuru kwa msingi wa wote sita kwa sawia kutokubaliana na mapingamizi/kesi ilizofunguliwa na hivyo kushindwa kuwaelewesha WaKenya ni makosa gani na kwa kiwango gani yanayoweza kufuta ushindi batili wa wa Raisi. Hii ni kwa mujibu wa gazeti la Daily Nation.

Huyu ni bw Aduma Owuor wa Nyakach,,,Nyanza,,aliye sema haya.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,MP vows to move bill to sack Supreme Court judges - Politics - nation.co.ke

Huyu ni mbunge kutoka chama cha CORD na ukweli ni kwamba,,,hii ni ndoto tuu
kutokana,,,,,,,, na hasira.:nono:

"I know as Cord we are fewer than our opponents in the house but we will fight hard
to ensure the bill goes through," he said.

Yaani,,,Bwana Owuor akesema,,kwamba ni wachache lakini watajaribu,,,,,,,viiiiiiipi
honorable??????????????

Rais Moi alisema mara mia,,,,,kwamba 'hii kitu inaitwa democrasia,,,,haita wezekana
Afrika'

Sasa,,,tunashuhudia Kenya,,,,,baba Moi,,,,,,,kushindana katika Afrika sijambo la mchezo
kama vile huchukuliwa huko ulaya na Marekani.

Hapa ni vita,,,machungu,,,,,utashinda aje,,,Mwafrika?????????????

Walio kua wanaimba democrasia,,,,ndio hao sasa,,,,he he he eti
democrasia on trial,,,,huuu ni mchezo mbaya.

Mkamvua nguo mwenyekiti wa IEBC,,,,,,,

Sasa mmewangeukia majaji watano kwamba ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,hawafai.

Mtakapo shindwa na kuwatingisha hawa majaji,,mtasema
nini,,,,kuchukua kisu na kuikata inchi kwa nusu ama kuipindua
serikali????????

Kenya ni kubwa na itakuwepo miaka maelfu,,ijao.

Lakini,,,tunaendelea tuu,,hatua kwa hatua,,,,mpaka tufike,,
Caanan.
___________________________________________________________

'An American based NGO, the Carter Centre which participated in Kenya's General Election
as an observer has concluded that the outcome reflected the will of the people
despite challenges the electoral commission faced'.

http://www.nation.co.ke/News/politics/-/1064/1739164/-/b0s25k/-/index.html

Hata wamarekani sasa wameanza kutoa yale makaratasi ambayo walikua
wameficha,,,,,,,,,,

 

[Jammu Africa]

The problem we have,,here in Kenya,,,,is that we fought for a new constitution,,,,
voted for it,,,in large numbers,,,,,but many of us seems,, do not respect
or understand it.

Since the coming of this Constitution,,,,some two years ago,,,we have a chief
justice(a former detainee under Moi) who was picked,,not from the old judiciary
as had happened before,,by the president,,,but,,this time, from outside the judiciary
,,,,selected from a large group of persons,,by a special commission, composed of different
parties of interests.

So is the Inspector General of police and also the chairman of IEBC.

These guys enjoys immense powers and cannot be dismissed as
easily as before,,,as some people are cheating themselves.

They went through a thorough public scrutiny and many Kenyans
approved of them.

We gave them powers and protection from any interference.

Now,,,we are hearing voices,,,,,,,,the same old ways,,,,,,,,,
pole sana,,,,,sa,,,ni Katiba inawika.

We better get used to what we brought,,,for ourselves,,,
and very fast.

Ama,,hata katiba ni,,,mbayaaaaaa????????????

 

[Jammu Africa]

Vyombo vya habari Kenya vimeripoti kuwa "MAWAKILI nchini wamekosoa uamuzi wa Mahakama ya Juu wa kukataa hati ya kiapo iliyokuwa na ushahidi uliodaiwa kufichua dosari za uchaguzi katika kesi ya kupinga ushindi wa Rais Mteule Uhuru Kenyatta" (kwa mujibu wa SwahiliHub).

The same LSK,,,, ambao walikua wameiomba supreme court eti wahusike kortini katika
hiyo kesi,,,kama marafiki wa korti na kuisaidia na ufafanusi wa sheria.

Ombi lao likatupwa mbali pale,,,,lawyers on defense side produced evidence
to show how LSK had been critical of IEBC and so not fit to participate.

So,,,LSK do not love the supreme court,,,,as simple as that.

Who is the chairman of LSK????? Eric Mutua,,,,,kutoka wapi????????

Tahadhari,,,sana,,,,,siasa za Kenya,,,,,hauwezi kutafautisha,,,,,
Shetani na Malaika.:wink::wink:

For,,,,you will need,,more than a biometric ,,,,,kujua baina ya nini na nani.