Mayor Quimby
JF-Expert Member
- Mar 13, 2021
- 4,950
- 10,977
Lazima iwe ngumu kuelewa, kama ujawahi kukutana na miujiza ya mungu; kama sisi wengine.
Aliyekuwa mbobezi wa Atheism, ageuka na kuwa Mkristo
Aliyekuwa mbobezi wa Atheism, ageuka na kuwa Mkristo
Hahaha na hili ni swali?
Atakuwa ni muumini mzuri sana, sema hataki kukiri kwako utaringa. Watu wabishi sio kwamba hawaamini, ila huwa wanapenda controversy tu kujifurahisha.
Mi nandhani kwa nyakati zile walikuwa wanasafiri kwa Punda, hawakufahamu kama Dunia ni kubwa kama tunavyoifahamu leo, walihisi Dunia nia Israel tu.
Technologia zimerahisisha mambo mengi ulimwengu huu wa sasa.
Watu wanafahamu mwaka kesho mvua zitanyeesha wapi kiasi gani na kwanini, lakini nyakati hizo hayo hayakuwezekana.
Hivyo naweza kusema uelewa wa Geography ulionao leo haukuwepo wakati huo biblia ikiandikwa, hivyo sioni sababu ya kubishania hilo.
Ndio Maana huoni nchi zingine, au mabara mengine ziki au yaki-tajwa kwenye Biblia, unaweza kuta hata hayo majina ahayakuwepo nyakati hizo.
Hivyo ndivyo naweza kuelezea hoja yako.
Setfree
JF-Expert Member
- Dec 25, 2024
- 1,679
- 2,123
- Thread starter
- #46
Challenging Atheism: Thought-Provoking Q&A Session 1
A: I once shared your perspective. The problem of evil was my greatest argument against God. However, I eventually realized that my very ability to call something "evil" meant I was borrowing from a moral standard—one that could not have originated from blind, indifferent nature.
If the universe were purely accidental, as atheism suggests, then suffering would simply be a meaningless byproduct of nature’s processes. But the fact that we perceive suffering as something unjust or wrong implies that we expect a reality where goodness, justice, and purpose exist. Where does that expectation come from?
Christianity offers a profound answer. It teaches that evil and suffering are not illusions, nor are they meaningless. They are distortions of a world that was once perfect but has fallen. God allows human free will, and with it comes the potential for both great love and great evil. Yet, Christianity also teaches that God did not remain distant from our suffering. He entered into it—through Jesus Christ, who suffered on the cross. The existence of suffering does not negate God’s goodness; rather, it shows that a solution is required, and Christ is that solution.
The Problem of Evil and Suffering
Q: If God is all-good and all-powerful, why does He allow so much evil and suffering in the world? A loving God wouldn’t stand by while children die of starvation, diseases ravage innocent people, and wars destroy millions of lives. Isn't the existence of suffering proof that God either doesn’t exist or isn’t good?A: I once shared your perspective. The problem of evil was my greatest argument against God. However, I eventually realized that my very ability to call something "evil" meant I was borrowing from a moral standard—one that could not have originated from blind, indifferent nature.
If the universe were purely accidental, as atheism suggests, then suffering would simply be a meaningless byproduct of nature’s processes. But the fact that we perceive suffering as something unjust or wrong implies that we expect a reality where goodness, justice, and purpose exist. Where does that expectation come from?
Christianity offers a profound answer. It teaches that evil and suffering are not illusions, nor are they meaningless. They are distortions of a world that was once perfect but has fallen. God allows human free will, and with it comes the potential for both great love and great evil. Yet, Christianity also teaches that God did not remain distant from our suffering. He entered into it—through Jesus Christ, who suffered on the cross. The existence of suffering does not negate God’s goodness; rather, it shows that a solution is required, and Christ is that solution.
Setfree
JF-Expert Member
- Dec 25, 2024
- 1,679
- 2,123
- Thread starter
- #47
Warumi 11:25-26
"Kwa maana, ndugu zangu, sipendi msijue siri hii, msije mkajiona wenye akili; ya kwamba ugumu kwa sehemu umetokea kwa Israeli, hata utimilifu wa Mataifa utakapoingia. Hivyo Israeli wote wataokolewa; kama ilivyoandikwa, Mkombozi atakuja kutoka Sayuni, atamwondolea Yakobo maasia yake."
Yeremia 31:33-34
"Bali hili ndilo agano nitakalofanya na nyumba ya Israeli baada ya siku zile, asema Bwana; Nitatia sheria yangu ndani yao, na katika mioyo yao nitaiandika; nami nitakuwa Mungu wao, nao watakuwa watu wangu."
Suala la Israeli linahitaji ufafanuzi mkubwa ili ulielewe.
kaburungu
JF-Expert Member
- Mar 9, 2011
- 3,706
- 6,901
Aisee JF ina watu, ubarikiwe sana mkuu bado naendelea kusoma maandishi yako.
kibobori mahoro
JF-Expert Member
- Dec 12, 2022
- 7,452
- 10,785
May be as the king Constantine of Rome at that time. He accepted Christianity for the sake of making business. Also that atheist accepted Christianity for the same reasons. He realised that "Christianity is a business ".
Setfree
JF-Expert Member
- Dec 25, 2024
- 1,679
- 2,123
- Thread starter
- #53
C.S. Lewis’s conversion was not for personal gain—he resisted Christianity for years, calling himself a “reluctant convert” because he knew it would cost him dearly. Unlike Constantine, Lewis had no political or financial incentive to become a Christian. In fact, his faith put him at odds with the academic elite of his time. He embraced Christianity because he found it to be true, not because it was profitable. If Christianity were merely a business, why would so many—including Lewis—sacrifice comfort, reputation, and even their lives for it?
Setfree
JF-Expert Member
- Dec 25, 2024
- 1,679
- 2,123
- Thread starter
- #54
Challenging Atheism: Thought-Provoking Q&A Session 2:
Faith vs. Reason
Q: Religious faith is just wishful thinking. It’s believing in something without evidence. Science has given us tangible, testable knowledge, while religion relies on blind faith. How can any rational person believe in Christianity when it lacks empirical proof?
A:That is a common misunderstanding of faith. True Christian faith is not belief in the absence of evidence—it is trust based on evidence. In fact, every worldview, including atheism, relies on some degree of faith.
Consider science itself. Science assumes that the universe is rational and governed by laws. But why should a mindless, purposeless universe give rise to rational laws or even consciousness? Why should we trust that our reasoning faculties, which supposedly evolved through blind processes, are even capable of discovering truth?
Christianity makes sense of reality in a way that atheism cannot. It explains why the universe is intelligible—because it was designed by an intelligent Creator. It explains why humans seek meaning—because we were made for a purpose. It explains why morality is objective—because it reflects God’s nature.
Faith, therefore, is not opposed to reason; it is the fulfillment of it. As I once wrote, “I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen—not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.”
Faith vs. Reason
Q: Religious faith is just wishful thinking. It’s believing in something without evidence. Science has given us tangible, testable knowledge, while religion relies on blind faith. How can any rational person believe in Christianity when it lacks empirical proof?
A:That is a common misunderstanding of faith. True Christian faith is not belief in the absence of evidence—it is trust based on evidence. In fact, every worldview, including atheism, relies on some degree of faith.
Consider science itself. Science assumes that the universe is rational and governed by laws. But why should a mindless, purposeless universe give rise to rational laws or even consciousness? Why should we trust that our reasoning faculties, which supposedly evolved through blind processes, are even capable of discovering truth?
Christianity makes sense of reality in a way that atheism cannot. It explains why the universe is intelligible—because it was designed by an intelligent Creator. It explains why humans seek meaning—because we were made for a purpose. It explains why morality is objective—because it reflects God’s nature.
Faith, therefore, is not opposed to reason; it is the fulfillment of it. As I once wrote, “I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen—not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.”
kidole cha simba
JF-Expert Member
- Jun 3, 2022
- 1,994
- 2,510
Weka kwa kiswahili bhana,wengine 2meishia FORM TWO B!!
kibobori mahoro
JF-Expert Member
- Dec 12, 2022
- 7,452
- 10,785
If you say he found Christianity as the truth, then logically other religions are false since God is one. He aimed at gaining popularity. If you investigate in detail, "religion reduces the thinking ability". Chinise are buss in technology but in Africa people are bussy in praying and fastin"
Lighton
JF-Expert Member
- Aug 5, 2019
- 1,424
- 2,333
Imani hakika ya Mambo yatarajiwayo, ni bayana ya Mambo yasiyowezekana.
Setfree
JF-Expert Member
- Dec 25, 2024
- 1,679
- 2,123
- Thread starter
- #59
C.S. Lewis was known for his intellectual honesty, not for seeking popularity. In fact, as I have already stated, his conversion came at a personal cost, as he initially resisted Christianity before being convinced by reason and evidence.
According to the law of non-contradiction, if Christianity is true, then any religious belief that contradicts its core teachings must be false. However, this does not mean that all aspects of other religions are false—many contain moral truths and valuable insights. But when it comes to the nature of God and salvation, truth must be consistent. Just as 2+2=4 excludes all other answers, ultimate truth cannot include contradictions.
As for the claim that "religion reduces thinking ability," history proves otherwise. Many great scientists and intellectuals, such as Isaac Newton and Blaise Pascal, were deeply religious. Faith and reason are not enemies; rather, they complement each other.
Regarding Africa, it seems you assume that prayer and fasting hinder technological progress. However, many African nations are advancing in science, medicine, and innovation while also valuing spirituality. China, despite its focus on technology, has deep-rooted spiritual and philosophical traditions, such as Confucianism and Buddhism. A society can pursue both technological growth and faith without conflict, as we see in the United States, where technological advancement continues alongside strong religious influence.