Arab Muslim: World architecture of slavery in Africa

Arab Muslim: World architecture of slavery in Africa

Sky Eclat

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2012
Posts
57,761
Reaction score
216,011
Sheik Saleh Al-Fawzan is a well-known scholar, leading Saudi Government cleric, and prolific author of the country’s religious curriculum. He believes Islam advocates slavery. Al-Fawzan argues against the idea that slavery has ever been abolished, insulting those who espouse this view as “ignorant, not scholars. They are merely writers. Whoever says such things is an infidel.” This is a man of great influence within the Muslim world. Al-Fawzan is a member of the Council of Religious Edicts and Research, the Imam of Prince Mitaeb Mosque in Riyadh and a professor at Imam Mohamed Bin Saud Islamic University, Saudi Arabia’s main center of learning for the strict Wahhabi interpretation of Islam. Al-Fawzan is a leading opponent of curriculum reform; he opposes elections and peaceful demonstrations as Western influences, is against Arab women

What is Slavery? First, let’s establish the definition of slavery. The United Nations defines slavery to be “the status or condition of a person over whom any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership are exercised” and slave as “a person in such condition or status”. But there are many types of slavery. Chattel slaves are property and can be traded as such. They have no rights, are expected to perform labor (and sexual favors) at the command of a slave master. This is the form of slavery practiced in the Americas during the trans-Atlantic slave trade.

There are reports that chattel slavery still exists in Islamic North Africa, in such countries as Mauritania and Sudan (despite both countries being participants in the 1956 UN slavery convention). One example is that of Francis Bok, who was taken into bondage during a raid on his village in southern Sudan in 1986 at the age of seven, and spent ten years as a chattel slave in the north of Sudan before escaping.

The Sudanese government denies the continued existence of slavery in its country. Debt bondage, bonded labor, or peonage, is a type of slavery that involves the use of people as collateral against debt. Labor is provided by the person who owes the debt, or a relative (typically a child). It was unusual for a bonded laborer to escape their debt, since further costs would accrue during the period of bondage (food, clothing, shelter), and it was common for the debt to be inherited across generations. In the Americas, peonage was extended to include criminal peonage, where prisoners sentenced to hard labor were ‘farmed out’ to private or governmental groups. Africa has its own unique version of debt bondage called pawn ship. Some claim that this was

this was a much milder form of debt bondage compared to that experienced elsewhere, since it would occur on a family or community basis where social ties existed between debtor and creditor. Forced labor, otherwise known as “unfree” labor, was based on the threat of violence against the laborer (or their family). Laborers contracted for a specific period would find themselves unable to escape their so-called employers.

This was used to an overwhelming extent in King Leopold’s Congo Free State and on Portuguese plantations of Cape Verde and San Tome. Serfdom is a term usually restricted to medieval Europe in which a tenant farmer was bound to a section of land and was thus under the control of a landlord. The serf achieved subsistence through the cultivation of their lord’s land, and was liable to provide other services, such as working on other sections of land or joining a war-band. A serf was tied to the land, and could not leave without his lord’s permission. A serf also required permission to marry, to sell goods, or to change their occupation.

Any legal redress lay with the lord. Although this is considered a European condition, the circumstances of servitude are not unlike those experienced under several African kingdoms, such as that of the Zulu in the early nineteenth century. When did slavery begin? Slavery began long before there was the written word. One of the earliest accounts is in the Old Testament, Joseph’s brothers sold him into slavery in Egypt because they were jealous of the good relationship he had with their parents.

They wanted him out of the way. In fact, Joseph was not the only slave in Egypt at that time. There were already hundreds, perhaps thousands, of black slaves constructing the pyramids. Many years later, in the time of the Prophet Muhammad, there were already a significant number of black slaves in Saudi Arabia. The most famous was Bilal. From the earliest writings, it is apparent that other Arab countries also imported slaves from Africa. Thus, we can safely say that slavery began long before the birth of Jesus Christ and persisted long after his death. Today, we view slavery from the prism of a global civilization. We look at the atrocities committed throughout history, from

ancient Egyptian slavery to the modern Jewish holocaust, and wonder what religion could legitimate or endorse such actions. We must ask ourselves, how does Islam permit slavery, even while its teachings and its laws were intended to liberate humanity from servitude in whatever form? True Muslims believe God revealed Islam for the happiness of all mankind, all generations, for all time.

How does this allow slavery? How did this religion, founded on complete equality, returning the entire human race to a single origin, and treating all men on an equal footing by virtue of this common origin, integrate slavery in its system and legislated about it? Could it be that Allah wants men divided forever into two categories: masters and slaves? Is this God’s will on earth? It seems so. Does not Allah address the human race by saying… “Verily, we have honored the sons of Adam, they will be a commodity that is bought and sold like mules”.
 
Why don’t Arab Muslims respect the laws and rules of the Holy Quran? Given that, Islam tells to masters about their slaves that: “you are equal to each other.” It declares: “Anyone who kills his slave, we will kill him. Anyone who shaves his slave, we will shave him. Anyone who emasculated his slave, we will emasculate him.” It also declares the oneness of the origin, the nature and fate of humanity: “You are the children of Adam and Adam was created from clay.” This establishes that a master has no merit over his slave, because no one is master and no one is slave. The only criterion of merit is now piety.

Arabs are not superior to non-Arabs nor are non-Arabs superior to Arabs, nor Black over White, or White over Black. Islam directs masters how to treat their slaves: “Be good to your parents, your relatives, orphans, the poor and the neighbor, the neighbor distance, the colleague the traveler, and slaves, because God does not, in truth, the presumptuous, arrogant.” Islam establishes that the relationship between masters and slaves is not a relationship of arrogance and subservience, nor a relationship of exploitation and humiliation, but a family relationship and fellowship. Masters are now the family’s servant, so that any marriage proposal should be addressed to them: “You can marry a woman among those of your slaves’believers. God knows best your faith because you are from each other. Wed them with the permission of their families

and let them donate a suitable dowry.” The slaves are our brothers: “Your slaves are your brothers. Do not ask what is beyond their capacity. And if you do, then help them.” Abd al-Zadir Kamal wrote in “Islam and the race question1: “In Islam, humanity is one family, created (with) ... diversity of color Skin ... (why) ... worshiping God, all men are equal, an Arab has no precedence over a non-Arab ... All beings are breathed ... equal. .. And marriages are entered regardless of skin color.” He therefore asserts that in Islam there is a racial harmony and all, regardless of their color, have “the same social rights ... legal obligations ... the opportunity to find work and protection ... of person” (p. 64). But is this true? Are 1 Published in 1970 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Place de Fonbnoy, 75 Paris-7e, Printed by Imprimerie Orientaliste, Louvain

these claims valid in the light of history? Arabs raided Saharan Africa for thirteen centuries without interruption. Millions suffered mightily at the hands of Arab Muslims. This painful page in the history of black people is apparently not permanently closed. The African slave trade started in 652 when the Arab general and Emir Abdullah bin Said imposed an agreement on Sudan, forcing them to deliver hundreds of slaves annually. The majority of these were people of Darfur. The slavers brought their product to the Arab-Muslim world via thousands of caravans through the Sahara Desert, crossing with camels and knowledge of the natural resources within this ocean of sand. Even so, the desert engulfed many caravans before they could reach the countries of the Berbers.

There are natural oases and man made wells in sufficient numbers for trade caravans to safely cross but for the slaves, the journey was the most horrific ordeal imaginable. The fearsome sandstorms, the temperature difference between day and night, walking across thousands of kilometers of sand and the frequent attacks by raiders’combined to cause high mortality among the captives.

Many died leaving their bones to bleach in the sun and sand, the survivors sold for a price. The misery, the poverty, the long demographic stagnation and the current blighted developmental of the African continent are not merely the consequences of the transatlantic slave trade, as many want to believe.
 
The drain of the best young men and women has been going on long before the white men appeared on the horizon. Studies on the early slave trade are legion and are dominated be the Arabs. Even though one cannot speak of degrees of horror or a monopoly on cruelty, few would argue that the Arab-Muslim slave trade that persisted for centuries was much more devastating than the transatlantic trade that followed. Likewise, the conversion to Islam of many Africans and all that it engendered, such as jihad, were the source of innumerable wars and conflict.

To this day, the genocide of black peoples by the Arab-Muslim nations goes largely ignored. No one wants to talk about it, even though it is still occurring. The Arabs conquered Egypt in the 7th century A.D. and proceeded to enslave the peoples of Nubia, Somalia, Mozambique, and elsewhere. This is the first Islamic expansion. Fierce attacks by Arab forces dealt harshly with the Nubians who defended themselves courageously. Nevertheless, faced with superior numbers and the repeated assaults by Arab jihadists, the Nubians negotiated a treaty known as Bakht.

This treaty committed the vanquished African monarch to turn over 360 captives every year destined to become slaves in the Arab-Muslim world. Not since the Egyptians conquered the lands around them and enslaved their peoples has slavery been such big business. Thus began large-scale Negro slave trade pulling thousands of blacks into the Arab-Muslim world. I use the term Arab-Muslim because after the Bakht, this trade expanded into trans-Saharan and Eastern Africa, ensnaring cities and regions until it extended far beyond the Arab world.

The traders who took part were also Berbers from the Maghreb, Turks of the Ottoman Empire and Iranians, hence Persians. The Arabs sold many African captives as far away as India. The king of Bengal possessed about 8000 slaves in the 15th century. The majority of men enslaved at the start of this trade came from the population of Darfur. It all began there and has never ceased. In the Arab world, the Wahhabi system found in Saudi Arabia for example, did not favor economic and social development through the hard work of its inhabitants. It became socially acceptable to buy slaves and subject them to endless servile labor. Moreover, for an Arab of those times, a man is never poor.

never poor so long as his neighbor possesses something. Holy Wars were just the thing if you wanted to become rich. Since every believer had the obligation to lead a jihad, it was imperative to subject and enslave the non-converted. They used the Quran as a pretext to stage raids on their infidel neighbors, stripping them of all they possessed including their lives if they resisted conversion. It was with a clear conscience and using methods that were convenient as well as blessed, that these converted Arab tribes ended up not living from their own labor.

This ensured the permanence of the African slave trade. Much of the Arab-Muslim slavery in Africa was due to the debauchery and laziness of these peoples dating from a time when they could not do without servile men to infuse strength and new blood into their societies. For example, in the middle of the 19th century, one third of the population of Oman was of African origin. Africans still play a central role in virtually every Arab society. Before the terrible castrations, there were first sudden raids and massacres. For example, in the Holy War led by that Sudanese Arab chieftain, a mystic, enlightened, who
 
considered himself a Mahdi or descendant of the Prophet, the whole of Sudan from the ocean to Egypt, taking in all the plateaux of Africa - from the Nile to the Zambezi - was subject to manhunts and the sale of captives. This space was twice the size of Europe, and certain explorers estimated its population to be around 100 million in the 19th century. To have an idea of the evil, you must realize that these same observers stated that to hunt down and carry off 500,000 individuals, it was necessary to kill almost two million others (who resisted or tried to flee).

So if births had ceased at the time, then, in less than a half-century, the interior of Africa would be nothing but a desolate wasteland today. I do indeed find the word “genocide” suitable for this unprecedented enterprise. It must be stated that the disdain of the Arabs towards Africans was also a catalyst.

The famous Arab historian of the 14th century, Ibn-Khaldum, wrote: “The only people who accept slavery are the Negroes, because of an inferior degree of humanity, their place being closer to the level of animals.” The question then was: how to see to it that these “animals” did not reproduce in Arab-Muslim lands. For from the outset of the slave trade, the traders wanted to prevent them from becoming rooted. Since there was nothing metaphysical about it, castration appeared to be a practical solution.

And so, in this effort to abase human beings, if the Arabs sent most black women to harems, they mutilated the men, using rudimentary procedures that caused a terrifying mortality. The figures on this slave trade are quite simply harrowing. There are many who would like to see the Arab-Muslim slave trade forever veiled in oblivion, often in the name of a certain religious or even ideological solidarity. It is in fact a virtual pact signed and sealed between the descendants of the victims and those of the executioners, that leads to this denial.

Because in this sort of “Stockholm syndrome African-style,” all of these fine people agree to place everything on the shoulders of the West. The selective silence surrounding the Arab-Muslim crimes against black peoples in effect points the root cause solely at the American transatlantic trade. This is the cement binding together Arabs and Negro-Africans, who have long been “fellow victims” of Western colonialism. That Arab-Muslim writers and other intellectuals attempt to
 
Make even the simplest memory of this infamy disappear, as if it had never existed, is easily understood. On the other hand, what is harder to grasp is the attitude of many researchers, and even of African Americans who are converting more and more to Islam. This attitude is not always healthy and is strongly influenced by a sort of self-censorship. As if evoking the slave trading past of Arab-Muslims is in some way tantamount to minimizing the American transatlantic trade.
 
In Africa, one Muslim Arab Sudanese group attacked the neighboring black people simply to convert them to Islam. Mahdi and his troop, tortured and killed many, their children sold as a slaves. Originally from the Sultanate of Oman, King Tippo Tippo, under the title of Sultan of Zanzibar, moved his army northward. Soon the majority of African slave ports fell under his control.

From this position of power, he sent slaves to the great markets in Udjidji, Tanzania, and Mombasa, Kenya. Meanwhile, Sefu, son of Tippo Tippo was the king of the region of Kasongo in Congo, now Democratic Republic of Congo. On the death of Tippo Tippo, his nephew Rachid succeeded him. Mohara, The king of the region of Nyangwe, sultan Rumaliza king of Udjidji Tanzania hunted populations in the shores of Lake Tanganyika to sell them as slaves. Still in the same period, Ngongo Lutete, head of the Congolese region of Lomami, unable to battle against the army of the Arabs finally agreed to kneel down and arrest his own population to sell them as slaves to Arabs.

In the other side, the Cardinal Lavigerie preached Across Europe against slavery. He bought slaves and resumed their liberty. In 1889, King Leopold II of Belgium organizes a conference in Brussels which brings together 17 nations in order to definitively prohibit the slave trade. Thus, a law was signed repealing any purchase or sale of human beings through the entire African territory.

During the same conference, a law prohibiting the delivery of weapons to the Arabs country by European countries was signed. Faced to the refusal of Arabs to work together to abolish slavery, Leopold II built two camps at Basoko and Lusambo in Congo to protect people and prevent Arabs to travel along the Congo River. Europeans and the Congolese army [composed of many tribes] were therefore faced to an army of Arab [more than 34,000 men] well equipped In southern Congo, the chief Ngongo Lutete for whom slavery was a very good deal launched a first attack to Lusambo, but without success. He tried to go through Sankuru, but the Congolese troops under the control of Commander Dhanis {Belgian} inflicted him a crushing defeat. Lutete and his troops signed an armistice and abandoned the hunt of slaves.
 
Few months later, Sefu king of Kasongo, son of Tippo Tippo gathered his troops and settle successfully Lomani. Dhanis and his army attack them by surprise and defeated them again. History also tells us that one the Village Lomani had been attacked by Arab slave traders killing anyone who resisted. At the end, this village has been completely stripped of its population and houses are burned.

Those who flee away have attended to the deportation of their family For these wicked and cruel slave traders, the black man was only an ordinary commodity. Their techniques of attack consist to attack villages at night by firing all around the village. People had a choice to perish or become slaves. Anyone who tried to resist was shot down. The Commander Dhanis launched an attack against these Arabs; once again it’s a victory. On the road of Nyangwe, they crush the troops of Mohara, his soldiers flee away with Sefu, and the region of Kasongo was liberated from the human merchants. Meanwhile, the commander Chaltin left Kasongo with 240 soldiers and defeated Rachid and his troops.

Villages they occupied were freed. The troops of the North and South met and go to war against King Rumaliza, one of the most powerful Arab sultans. The battle lasted about 2 years, but at the end they were victorious. Sefu was killed, Rachid imprisoned and Rumaliza fled away. In Sudan, the “Mahdist” spread terror by killing those who opposed to the Islamization and was sold as slaves.

Slaves were sent to Zanzibar at first, and then exported to the Middle Eastern country. They attacked the village of Uele in Congo, but were defeated by the Congolese army supported by Belgium. Thus, Africa was stripped of its worthy sons. Some villages were almost emptied of all its population because of slavery, perpetrated by Arabs, later the Europeans with the complicity of African tribal leaders.

How many Africans became slaves? From the 15th to the 19th century, how many Africans were sold? The statistical elements removed from the books of ships and slave ports provide only approximations that give free rein to discussions. Many numbers are advanced. Dubois gave a figure of fifteen million slaves sold. He believes that for
 
a slave arrived in America, four perished on the road. What does seventy million, which must be added those of the Eastern trade, a figure of about ninety to one hundred million Africans? La Ronciere arrives at the figure of twenty million without counting the 16th century and stopping in 1848. But Professor Rincon estimated thirteen million in the deportation of the only Congolese.

Pruneau de Pommegorge believes that the African coast has delivered 45000 slaves per year, and for these 45000, he said, an infinite number of other men were killed. Frossard wrote in the 18th century ‘’if it has evaluated 36000 the average number of Negroes taken annually from Guinea (now we import 100000 Negroes per year) and we multiplied by the years that have elapsed since beginning of the slavery, we shall see with horror that they form a total of over ten million people lost from their homeland. But if we consider that every negro taken from Africa will cost at least five other people died in battles and long walks or through despair, we recognize with righteous indignation that the greed of Europe has delighted Africa at least seventy million of honest citizens.

The Reverend Monens, Jesuit, came to roughly the same estimate. He said ‘’at the very least we can say that, ten million Negroes were reduced to slaves, and without exaggeration it is necessary for each of these negroes, five more killed in Africa, died on the way or at sea.’’And adding the Eastern trade, he cites a figure of one hundred million slaves. The Arab Slave Trade In the 8th century, Arabs had extended their domination in the eastern side of Africa bordering the Indian Ocean they had built cities today buried under the tropical forests. Regrowth by the Portuguese at the end of the 15th century who toured the continent, they soon recovered, and two hundred years later, was again become the masters of the coast.
 
At exactly what time Arabs entered Africa? It is difficult to answer but this sad trade over millennia is estimated to have taken more than ten millions Africans via the Eastern route to India, Saudi Arabia and Turkey and also via the Trans Saharan route to North Africa and the Mediterranean where in slave market such as Morocco, Africans were purchased to work as servant. Slaves were owned in all Islamic societies both sedentary and nomadic, ranging from Arabia in the centre, to North Africa in the West and to what is now Pakistan and Indonesia in the East.

During the 18thcentury, the Arab slave trade took a brutal turn. By 1839 slaving became the prime Arab enterprise. The demand of slave of Saudi, Egypt, and Persia created a wave of destruction on Eastern Africa. 45000 slaves were passing through Zanzibar every year. To satisfy this demand, the Arabs hunted deep into the interiors of Africa. They were following ancient trails from Bagamoyo, Kilwa, and Tanga where terror and destruction followed in their wake.

The Arabs plunders met with savage resistance which meant that the trade had a very high mortality rate. Many documents speak of the road littered with the weak and the dying, they abandoned and they maimed, left with yokes around their necks. Many as in the case of Tsavo became food for lions. Children who became a burden to the coffle gang were brutally murdered in front of their mothers.
 
When Islam arrived, war and servitude were features of African and Arabian life. Judaism existed among certain Arab tribes as well as Christianity, and like them Islam did not blatantly outlaw slavery; Islam did however blatantly outlawed chattel enslavement.

The Quran with every reference to slavery ask the believer to free the slave as atonement for sin, the term “emancipating a slave and feeding an orphan” are repeated constantly throughout the Quran as acts which gain God’s favor. Also there were regulations which enhanced the pre-Islamic laws with respect to the treatment of enslaved people. They were entitled to good care, to the same clothing and food as their masters.

Under Arab slavery men were castrated and the women were used as sexmachines, so that over generations the offspring of the enslaved women merged into general Arab society, albeit into an inferior caste-type class of sub-species. Today we have slave descendants across the Sahara, such as the Haran tines in Mauritania, to the ebony blacks in Arabia. At this period, Black Africans were transported to the Islamic empire across the Sahara to Morocco and Tunisia from West Africa, from Chad to Libya, along the Nile from East Africa, and up the coast of East Africa to the Persian Gulf. This trade had been well entrenched for over 600 years before Europeans arrived, and had driven the rapid expansion of Islam across North Africa.
 
He believes Islam advocates slavery. Al-Fawzan argues against the idea that slavery has ever been abolished, insulting those who espouse this view as “ignorant, not scholars.
Kwenye sentensi ya kwanza sikubaliani na Fauzan na kwa kweli ni kinyume chake. Kwa Uislamu rejea yake kuu ni Quran. Aya nyingi zinaagiza kuacha huru mtumwa kama kikomboleo au faini kwa makosa. Sentensi ya pili nakubaliana naye kwa hoja nilizoziandika kutokubaliana na sentensi ya kwanza, yaani kuacha huru mtumwa kutumika kama faini kwa makosa yanayofanywa.
 
Kwenye sentensi ya kwanza sikubaliani na Fauzan na kwa kweli ni kinyume chake. Kwa Uislamu rejea yake kuu ni Quran. Aya nyingi zinaagiza kuacha huru mtumwa kama kikomboleo au faini kwa makosa. Sentensi ya pili nakubaliana naye kwa hoja nilizoziandika kutokubaliana na sentensi ya kwanza, yaani kuacha huru mtumwa kutumika kama faini kwa makosa yanayofanywa.
Ninachoamini ni kuwa utumwa ulikuwa style ya maisha ya enzi hizo. Hata Abraham na Lotu walisafiri na watumwa wao kwenda nchi ya ahadi.

Jacob alioopatana na Essau walikutana kila mmoja akiwa na watumwa wake..Ila baadae Kuna watu waliona fursa katika biashara ya utumwa na watu hawa waliweka pesa mbele.
 
Unachanganya ufahamu kuhusu utumwa,pengine ungefahamu maana ya utumwa according to Saleh Al-Fawzan and according to Islamic cleric, pengine wewe unazungumzia utumwa wa akina Tipu-Tipu.

Sheik Saleh Al-Fawzan is a well-known scholar, leading Saudi Government cleric, and prolific author of the country’s religious curriculum. He believes Islam advocates slavery. Al-Fawzan argues against the idea that slavery has ever been abolished, insulting those who espouse this view as “ignorant, not scholars. They are merely writers. Whoever says such things is an infidel.” This is a man of great influence within the Muslim world. Al-Fawzan is a member of the Council of Religious Edicts and Research, the Imam of Prince Mitaeb Mosque in Riyadh and a professor at Imam Mohamed Bin Saud Islamic University, Saudi Arabia’s main center of learning for the strict Wahhabi interpretation of Islam. Al-Fawzan is a leading opponent of curriculum reform; he opposes elections and peaceful demonstrations as Western influences, is against Arab women

What is Slavery? First, let’s establish the definition of slavery. The United Nations defines slavery to be “the status or condition of a person over whom any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership are exercised” and slave as “a person in such condition or status”. But there are many types of slavery. Chattel slaves are property and can be traded as such. They have no rights, are expected to perform labor (and sexual favors) at the command of a slave master. This is the form of slavery practiced in the Americas during the trans-Atlantic slave trade.

There are reports that chattel slavery still exists in Islamic North Africa, in such countries as Mauritania and Sudan (despite both countries being participants in the 1956 UN slavery convention). One example is that of Francis Bok, who was taken into bondage during a raid on his village in southern Sudan in 1986 at the age of seven, and spent ten years as a chattel slave in the north of Sudan before escaping.

The Sudanese government denies the continued existence of slavery in its country. Debt bondage, bonded labor, or peonage, is a type of slavery that involves the use of people as collateral against debt. Labor is provided by the person who owes the debt, or a relative (typically a child). It was unusual for a bonded laborer to escape their debt, since further costs would accrue during the period of bondage (food, clothing, shelter), and it was common for the debt to be inherited across generations. In the Americas, peonage was extended to include criminal peonage, where prisoners sentenced to hard labor were ‘farmed out’ to private or governmental groups. Africa has its own unique version of debt bondage called pawn ship. Some claim that this was

this was a much milder form of debt bondage compared to that experienced elsewhere, since it would occur on a family or community basis where social ties existed between debtor and creditor. Forced labor, otherwise known as “unfree” labor, was based on the threat of violence against the laborer (or their family). Laborers contracted for a specific period would find themselves unable to escape their so-called employers.

This was used to an overwhelming extent in King Leopold’s Congo Free State and on Portuguese plantations of Cape Verde and San Tome. Serfdom is a term usually restricted to medieval Europe in which a tenant farmer was bound to a section of land and was thus under the control of a landlord. The serf achieved subsistence through the cultivation of their lord’s land, and was liable to provide other services, such as working on other sections of land or joining a war-band. A serf was tied to the land, and could not leave without his lord’s permission. A serf also required permission to marry, to sell goods, or to change their occupation.

Any legal redress lay with the lord. Although this is considered a European condition, the circumstances of servitude are not unlike those experienced under several African kingdoms, such as that of the Zulu in the early nineteenth century. When did slavery begin? Slavery began long before there was the written word. One of the earliest accounts is in the Old Testament, Joseph’s brothers sold him into slavery in Egypt because they were jealous of the good relationship he had with their parents.

They wanted him out of the way. In fact, Joseph was not the only slave in Egypt at that time. There were already hundreds, perhaps thousands, of black slaves constructing the pyramids. Many years later, in the time of the Prophet Muhammad, there were already a significant number of black slaves in Saudi Arabia. The most famous was Bilal. From the earliest writings, it is apparent that other Arab countries also imported slaves from Africa. Thus, we can safely say that slavery began long before the birth of Jesus Christ and persisted long after his death. Today, we view slavery from the prism of a global civilization. We look at the atrocities committed throughout history, from

ancient Egyptian slavery to the modern Jewish holocaust, and wonder what religion could legitimate or endorse such actions. We must ask ourselves, how does Islam permit slavery, even while its teachings and its laws were intended to liberate humanity from servitude in whatever form? True Muslims believe God revealed Islam for the happiness of all mankind, all generations, for all time.

How does this allow slavery? How did this religion, founded on complete equality, returning the entire human race to a single origin, and treating all men on an equal footing by virtue of this common origin, integrate slavery in its system and legislated about it? Could it be that Allah wants men divided forever into two categories: masters and slaves? Is this God’s will on earth? It seems so. Does not Allah address the human race by saying… “Verily, we have honored the sons of Adam, they will be a commodity that is bought and sold like mules”.

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Bullshit
Why don’t Arab Muslims respect the laws and rules of the Holy Quran? Given that, Islam tells to masters about their slaves that: “you are equal to each other.” It declares: “Anyone who kills his slave, we will kill him. Anyone who shaves his slave, we will shave him. Anyone who emasculated his slave, we will emasculate him.” It also declares the oneness of the origin, the nature and fate of humanity: “You are the children of Adam and Adam was created from clay.” This establishes that a master has no merit over his slave, because no one is master and no one is slave. The only criterion of merit is now piety.

Arabs are not superior to non-Arabs nor are non-Arabs superior to Arabs, nor Black over White, or White over Black. Islam directs masters how to treat their slaves: “Be good to your parents, your relatives, orphans, the poor and the neighbor, the neighbor distance, the colleague the traveler, and slaves, because God does not, in truth, the presumptuous, arrogant.” Islam establishes that the relationship between masters and slaves is not a relationship of arrogance and subservience, nor a relationship of exploitation and humiliation, but a family relationship and fellowship. Masters are now the family’s servant, so that any marriage proposal should be addressed to them: “You can marry a woman among those of your slaves’believers. God knows best your faith because you are from each other. Wed them with the permission of their families

and let them donate a suitable dowry.” The slaves are our brothers: “Your slaves are your brothers. Do not ask what is beyond their capacity. And if you do, then help them.” Abd al-Zadir Kamal wrote in “Islam and the race question1: “In Islam, humanity is one family, created (with) ... diversity of color Skin ... (why) ... worshiping God, all men are equal, an Arab has no precedence over a non-Arab ... All beings are breathed ... equal. .. And marriages are entered regardless of skin color.” He therefore asserts that in Islam there is a racial harmony and all, regardless of their color, have “the same social rights ... legal obligations ... the opportunity to find work and protection ... of person” (p. 64). But is this true? Are 1 Published in 1970 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Place de Fonbnoy, 75 Paris-7e, Printed by Imprimerie Orientaliste, Louvain

these claims valid in the light of history? Arabs raided Saharan Africa for thirteen centuries without interruption. Millions suffered mightily at the hands of Arab Muslims. This painful page in the history of black people is apparently not permanently closed. The African slave trade started in 652 when the Arab general and Emir Abdullah bin Said imposed an agreement on Sudan, forcing them to deliver hundreds of slaves annually. The majority of these were people of Darfur. The slavers brought their product to the Arab-Muslim world via thousands of caravans through the Sahara Desert, crossing with camels and knowledge of the natural resources within this ocean of sand. Even so, the desert engulfed many caravans before they could reach the countries of the Berbers.

There are natural oases and man made wells in sufficient numbers for trade caravans to safely cross but for the slaves, the journey was the most horrific ordeal imaginable. The fearsome sandstorms, the temperature difference between day and night, walking across thousands of kilometers of sand and the frequent attacks by raiders’combined to cause high mortality among the captives.

Many died leaving their bones to bleach in the sun and sand, the survivors sold for a price. The misery, the poverty, the long demographic stagnation and the current blighted developmental of the African continent are not merely the consequences of the transatlantic slave trade, as many want to believe.

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Idiot
The drain of the best young men and women has been going on long before the white men appeared on the horizon. Studies on the early slave trade are legion and are dominated be the Arabs. Even though one cannot speak of degrees of horror or a monopoly on cruelty, few would argue that the Arab-Muslim slave trade that persisted for centuries was much more devastating than the transatlantic trade that followed. Likewise, the conversion to Islam of many Africans and all that it engendered, such as jihad, were the source of innumerable wars and conflict.

To this day, the genocide of black peoples by the Arab-Muslim nations goes largely ignored. No one wants to talk about it, even though it is still occurring. The Arabs conquered Egypt in the 7th century A.D. and proceeded to enslave the peoples of Nubia, Somalia, Mozambique, and elsewhere. This is the first Islamic expansion. Fierce attacks by Arab forces dealt harshly with the Nubians who defended themselves courageously. Nevertheless, faced with superior numbers and the repeated assaults by Arab jihadists, the Nubians negotiated a treaty known as Bakht.

This treaty committed the vanquished African monarch to turn over 360 captives every year destined to become slaves in the Arab-Muslim world. Not since the Egyptians conquered the lands around them and enslaved their peoples has slavery been such big business. Thus began large-scale Negro slave trade pulling thousands of blacks into the Arab-Muslim world. I use the term Arab-Muslim because after the Bakht, this trade expanded into trans-Saharan and Eastern Africa, ensnaring cities and regions until it extended far beyond the Arab world.

The traders who took part were also Berbers from the Maghreb, Turks of the Ottoman Empire and Iranians, hence Persians. The Arabs sold many African captives as far away as India. The king of Bengal possessed about 8000 slaves in the 15th century. The majority of men enslaved at the start of this trade came from the population of Darfur. It all began there and has never ceased. In the Arab world, the Wahhabi system found in Saudi Arabia for example, did not favor economic and social development through the hard work of its inhabitants. It became socially acceptable to buy slaves and subject them to endless servile labor. Moreover, for an Arab of those times, a man is never poor.

never poor so long as his neighbor possesses something. Holy Wars were just the thing if you wanted to become rich. Since every believer had the obligation to lead a jihad, it was imperative to subject and enslave the non-converted. They used the Quran as a pretext to stage raids on their infidel neighbors, stripping them of all they possessed including their lives if they resisted conversion. It was with a clear conscience and using methods that were convenient as well as blessed, that these converted Arab tribes ended up not living from their own labor.

This ensured the permanence of the African slave trade. Much of the Arab-Muslim slavery in Africa was due to the debauchery and laziness of these peoples dating from a time when they could not do without servile men to infuse strength and new blood into their societies. For example, in the middle of the 19th century, one third of the population of Oman was of African origin. Africans still play a central role in virtually every Arab society. Before the terrible castrations, there were first sudden raids and massacres. For example, in the Holy War led by that Sudanese Arab chieftain, a mystic, enlightened, who

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Back
Top Bottom