Cost comparison SGR Kenya vs SGR Tanzania

Cost comparison SGR Kenya vs SGR Tanzania

coodip1 said:
Wewe ni boya huenda ikawa hujui kusoma [emoji116]View attachment 1808117
Click to expand...
Tumeipata tayari! 😷
Screenshot_20210604_173454.jpg
 
Tony254 said:
Tanzania hata Tanesco haiko kwenye twitter. Nimejaribu kuitafuta kwenye twitter na sijaiona. What a pathetic country.
Click to expand...
Wewe huwa unakuwaga na reasons za kipumbavu sn yn kama hujaenda shule aisee reasoning zako saa ingine ni za kipuuzi mno [emoji116][emoji116][emoji116]
Screenshot_20210604-175823.jpg
 

DATA HUB​

Why review of energy sector woes should go beyond existing PPAs​

MONDAY APRIL 26 2021
kplc

A Kenya Power technician inspects a line. FILE PHOTO | NMG

Eddy Njoroge Pic

By Edward Njoroge
More by this Author

​

SUMMARY​

  • Studies have been conducted in various countries around the world, notable of which was in Sri Lanka and Pakistan in the 1990s on the economic loss of unsupplied electricity.
  • It was found that every kilowatt (kW) that was not supplied had an economic cost of at least $1/Kwh — Sh108 — and resulted in major dips in the gross domestic product of a country.


The most expensive energy is no energy at all.

Studies have been conducted in various countries around the world, notable of which was in Sri Lanka and Pakistan in the 1990s on the economic loss of unsupplied electricity. It was found that every kilowatt (kW) that was not supplied had an economic cost of at least $1/Kwh — Sh108 — and resulted in major dips in the gross domestic product of a country. Allow me to park this thought for now and revisit it towards the end of this article.

Last week, President Uhuru Kenyatta gazetted the appointment of a long-overdue task force on the review of Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). Since then, a lot has been written about this task force and the sector, most of which I agree with, but some of which I disagree with. My friend Jaindi Kisero with whom we agree most of the times penned one article on March 31 in which he raised several points that I wish to address.

First, he touched on the composition of the committee. I fully agree that the John Ngumi-chaired task force as constituted today is competent enough to rationally re-look at the Independent Power Producers (IPPs) regime from a much broader perspective, critiquing what went wrong, exploring what can be negotiated (and the repercussions of the same) and recommending what needs to be done as we move forward.

The previous committee appointed by Energy Cabinet secretary Charles Keter was not sufficiently independent as it comprised mainly senior officers of Kenya Power, who partly got us where we are in the first place and whose primary interest would have been that of the company.

Going through the terms of reference, however, I felt that there should have been an overarching task — to review the financial stability of Kenya Power and propose ways of ensuring long-term sustainability. Kenya Power is the central pillar of the energy sector and piecemeal solutions may not help it as envisaged.

Power generators, especially IPPs, maybe one of the problems, but perhaps the least of them. We need to look at the whole sector but focus more on the centre. Re-negotiations with the IPPs must come as part of finding a holistic and sustainable solution for Kenya Power.

Let me remind our readers that PPAs are bilateral agreements between Kenya Power and electricity generators. The Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (Epra)’s job is to balance the interests of all stakeholders and to ensure the overall sustainability of the sector. It is not to negotiate prices.

Kenya Power negotiates them jointly with the power generators and submits the PPA to the regulator to approve. So Kenya Power could have said no to any power generator. They had the power to do so but did not seem to have the will and the capacity to do so.

Let me now come to the point where I vehemently disagree with Mr Kisero when he says “We must accept that the experimentation with private producers, which we have been trying for several decades, is one of the main reasons why we don’t have cheap power”.

IPPS were not an experiment but a condition of accessing funds under the Energy Sector Recovery Programme of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

IPPs had started developing power in various parts of the globe in the late 1970s and early 1980s to complement the seemingly inefficient and limited public utilities. They were seen as faster in implementation, more efficient in their operations and able to attract private capital into a sector that had been hitherto funded only by the multilateral funding agents.

In the 1996 Kenya’s development policy paper titled “Economic Recovery Strategy for Wealth Creation and Economic Development”, Kenya stated her intention to restructure the power sector and to promote private sector investment.

The Electric Power Act 1997 was also enacted, creating for the first time an independent regulator for the sector. IPPs are not what makes our energy sector expensive, rather a multitude of causes. If there were no IPPs today, the only public utility generator — Kenya Electricity Generating Company (KenGen) — could not meet the country’s demand and we could end up rationing power at a much higher cost than we are paying.

Let me now deal with the argument of “apparent” excess power.

We have no real excess power with an installed capacity of about 3,030 megawatts for a population of 50 million. Population-comparable countries in Africa have the following installed capacities — Algeria (43 million, 21,000 megawatts), South Africa (57 million, 44,000 megawatts) Morocco (35 million, 11,000 megawatts). And similar comparisons in Europe — Spain (47 million 110,000 megawatts), France (67 million 135,000 megawatts), Italy (60 million,122,000 megawatts). Even smaller population countries like Norway (five million, 36,000 megawatts) Sweden (10 million, 41,000 megawatts).

Those who argue that we have excess power in Kenya need to consider the following electricity industry realities.

There is a difference between Capacity Installed and Effective Capacity, between Power and Electric Energy (E=Power* time) and between firm and non-firm power. Above all, a power system requires a reasonable amount of reserve margin to cater for inevitable system realities like unplanned outages, intermittent variable energy sources, among others.

Apart from these plants, Kipeto Wind (100 megawatts) and four solar plants — Malindi, Eldosol, Radiant, and Alten Solar in Keses — are in various stages of construction and commissioning with a total of 200 megawatts.
There are a few others like Rumuruti Solar, Kopere and Kipeto ll that have got PPAs and are awaiting the Government Letter of Support.

Our power generation mix is therefore still very fragile. With an installed capacity of 1,800 megawatts, KenGen cannot be able to meet the country’s peak demand. We have about 800 megawatts from hydro sources that are dependent on hydrology. If there is a drought like we had in 1999-2000, we would not have enough energy generated. Also, wind and solar are intermittent, meaning that even if we consider a 300 megawatts wind plant, the Plant Load Factor (PLF) could be as low as 30 per cent (100 megawatts being available). Fortunately for us, Lake Turkana Wind Plant has got one of the best wind regimes, recording up to 60 per cent availability.

What our system is suffering from is a lack of demand and not an oversupply. This is what we need to address. When the Government of Kenya launched the 5,000 megawatts in 40 months programme in 2013, some of us were excited but inwardly concerned about the consequences of this very ambitious programme in the event that the demand did not grow as anticipated.

Unfortunately, the government’s projections were anchored on expected demand growth from the Rural Electrification Programme, and especially their last-mile projects. I recall my intervention at the Kenyatta International Convention Centre where I said, “ the total cost of putting up +5.000 megawatts would be about $13.75 billion and Kenya Power would have to pay Sh14 billion per month to amortise this investment over 20 years. Can Kenya Power be able to pay this amount?

Not too sure what happened to the programme, but the fact that Kenya Power is not able to pay for the current 3,000 megawatts installed shows that it would not have been able to pay for this ambitious programme unless the fundamentals had shifted significantly.

Most of the recent renewable IPPs have been contracted under the Feed-in-Tariff (FiT).

The FiT policy was first published in 2008. The policy simply tells the investor the available tariff that the government is prepared to pay for certain modes and sizes of generation. The initial FiT had rates of US 20 cents for solar and wind and there were no takers as the feasible threshold for these modes of power generation was US 23 cents/kWh.

The cost of solar panels and balance of plant continued to come down driven mainly by improved solar technology and huge demand, and our FiT was revised in 2010 to US cents 12 and US cents 11 respectively. Currently, they are at 7.5 US cents and 7 US cents although not yet formalised.

The notion of Take or Pay causes a lot of consternation to the consumers and the public in general. How do you pay for energy that you have not consumed? This is a question we hear over and over again.

This is not unique to Kenya and indeed all PPAs were initially on a Take or Pay basis. The principle is quite simple — a methodology of mitigating the power demand risk on the party best suited to mitigate it. The utility projects the energy demand curve and invites the private sector to build power plants. In all cases, the developer has to borrow monies that amount to millions of dollars. If the utility does not pay the developer, he will not be able to service his debt.

The capacity charge, which is paid whether energy is delivered or not, is for servicing the debt incurred in putting up the power plant.

As the task force sits down to deliberate on this important issue, I would urge them not to resolve the problem of Kenya Power with a short-term solution that will create a much longer-term problem not just for the energy sector but also for the whole investment climate in Kenya.

Let us address all the other issues that are ailing the sector. Let us talk of the 26 per cent commercial and technical losses at Kenya Power, and explore the energy storage options. Let us be innovative in our solution to the problem. Could, for instance, KenGen borrow cheaply and take over some of the plants? Going forward, should we adopt a model like the highly acclaimed REIPP project of South Africa that has added more than 6,000 megawatts of renewable energy over the last 10 years? How do we increase our demand compared to that of our peers?

These and many others are the questions that the task force must address if we are to get out of the muddle that we find ourselves in.

We need to look at the problems of Kenya Power and the energy sector with a much wider lens. Let us not gain today but in five years find ourselves with insufficient power and no one willing to invest in Kenya’s power sub-sector because the policies are unpredictable and shifty.

Let us remember my opening line-The most expensive energy is no energy at all Let us seek a win-win outcome.

Mr Njoroge was the CEO of KenGen for more than 10 years and currently is the President of ISO- International Organisation of Standardisation. He sits on the Board of Globeleq, a pan-African power company, and on the Investment Committee of Africa Renewable Energy Fund. His contact: eddy@njoroge.com

www.businessdailyafrica.com

Why review of energy sector woes should go beyond existing PPAs

Regulator should balance stakeholder interests and ensure overall sustainability in power output.
www.businessdailyafrica.com www.businessdailyafrica.com
 

Opinion: Nigeria- A Loud No to Narrow Gauge Rail System​


Rail-Bus 3 days ago


By Lawal Toro
2017_12large_Nigerian_Railway_Corporation-1.jpg




On Tuesday, 16th March 2021, President Muhammadu Buhari virtually flagged off the Port-Harcourt- Maiduguri reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Nigeria Railway narrow gauge project as part of the nationwide rehabilitation of transport infrastructure at the cost of $3.02 billion dollars. The project, which is to be completed in 33 months, also involves the reconstruction of the Bonny Deep Sea Port, the Railway Industrial Park and the construction of a spar to Damaturu and Gashua in Yobe State.

President Buhari assured the nation that the connection of the railway to a new seaport in Bonny Island and railway industrial park in Port-Harcourt is designed to increase the viability and transhipment of cargo and freight locally across the West-African sub-region and in the Continental Free Trade Area.

The president added that there will be further utilisation of local content and technology transfer, increase in Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) and will serve as a fulcrum of Integrated Development Master Plan (IDMP) of the railways.

While the president is optimistic about achieving the above objectives, the rehabilitation of the narrow gauge railway ran counter to the 25-year development plan produced in 2000 by the Federal Ministry of Transport to guide the future development of the Nigerian railways. The plan had recommended a complete shift from narrow gauge to standard gauge rail-line in tune with International Best Practices.

The master plan had recommended that any building of a narrow gauge was over. The plan made it clear that no country builds narrow rail gauge lines nowadays, not even China or India. The plan said no one manufactures new locomotive engines for narrow gauge unless on special order, which makes it more expensive and the spare parts for the engines more scarce and more expensive. As far as the plan is concerned, narrow-gauge rail lines are considered archaic and outdated all over the world.

Experts, therefore, fault the Ministry of Transportation for unilaterally imposing the narrow gauge without due consideration for the need for a modern railway system. They liken the policy of the introduction to the analogue telephone system into the digital mobile tracks system. In fact, the standard gauge is not only faster and cheaper but more reliable with a minimum accident.

Furthermore, spare parts for the narrow gauge system in the stores nationwide had long ago been sold as scrap, thereby jeopardising the possibility of the rehabilitation of the existing locomotives and rolling stocks.

The Nigeria railway, as a whole, has seen its assets being pillaged like in no other time. From 1997 to date, the railway lost almost all the 50 Chinese locomotive engines and the five German locomotives that were bought during the Abacha era. Foundries, mechanical workshops and railway stocks worth billions of naira have disappeared into thin air without anyone being held to account for these unprecedented thefts. It is common knowledge that the situation in the railway has become so pathetic that even the railway tracks are being stolen.

A recent investigation by the Daily Trust Newspapers paints a picture of not only dilapidation but total lack of leadership in managing the railway assets across the country. The contracts that were awarded between 2010 – 2015 that are worth over N60 billion, some of which were paid for upfront to rehabilitate and reconstruct the same Port Harcourt-Maiduguri rail line, remain undone and no one and no companies are being asked to refund the money paid for the work not done.

The rail line between Port Harcourt and Kuru in Plateau State, which was built between 1920–1930, and Kuru – Maiduguri 1958 – 1963 had all outlived their usefulness.

Experts believe the decision to expend $3.02 billion to rehabilitate and reconstruct the Port Harcourt – Maiduguri narrow gauge rail line will be economically unviable.

Decisions that are taken that affect the Nigerian Railways without due consultations with the management of the corporation and its Board of Directors can only deliver failure.

To compound the accountability problem of the railways’ progress, the powers of the management/board had been usurped by the ministry without due consideration to the ethics of rail transportation that had been in the custody of the NRC trained staff and stock and experienced retirees of the cooperation.

The federal government’s financial commitment on a loan to this important project does not raise the hope of standardising NRC at par with the expectation of a modern railway system nor will it enable it to cater to the ever-increasing need for a viable alternative to a road transport system that is ever increasingly becoming too expensive and chaotic.

The silence of the National Assembly on this troubling reconstruction is not only disturbing but shows a lack of understanding and concern by those who have the oversight function to make Nigeria great once again.

The railway is too important to be left in the hands of usurpers in the ministry who have no understanding or capacity to midwife it to the modern era.

It is time to stop this contract and review it in its entirety so that no money is wasted for a project that is doomed to failure.

*Adamu Lawal Toro. Toro is of No. 5 Lord Lugard Street, Asokoro, Abuja, Nigeria.

Source : Daily Trust

railbus.com.ng

Opinion: Nigeria- A Loud No to Narrow Gauge Rail System - Railway Business Magazine

By Lawal Toro On Tuesday, 16th March 2021, President Muhammadu Buhari virtually flagged off the Port-Harcourt- Maiduguri reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Nigeria Railway narrow gauge project as part of the nationwide rehabilitation of transport infrastructure at the cost of $3.02 billion...
railbus.com.ng railbus.com.ng
 
The best 007 said:
Hawapendi kusikia [emoji3516][emoji3516][emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787]
Click to expand...
Hatupendi kuskia kivipi na alieandika hio tweet ni mkenya na amequote media ya kutoka Kenya(EA - East African)
 
Kafrican said:
Hatupendi kuskia kivipi na alieandika hio tweet ni mkenya na amequote media ya kutoka Kenya(EA - East African)
Click to expand...
Wakenya mbn washakubali kwamba Tanzania ni baba lao hapa EA sema nyinyi Wakenya wa Jf ndo mnajifanya hamtaki kukubali ila mkiwa Twitter malalamiko kibao.
 
TRC CEO




MY TAKE
LOT 4 and LOT 3 tendering is ongoing
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Our Community

Regional Communities

Back
Top Bottom
Menu
Forums
New posts
Log in
Register