Cost comparison SGR Kenya vs SGR Tanzania

Cost comparison SGR Kenya vs SGR Tanzania

The results were released in 2020, that's what I meant. The figures nazo ni za 2019. I know kingereza ndio shida kwako.
if profit rose to Kshs 8.8 bln from Kshs 3.7bln in 2019 that means the figure Kshs 8.8 bln is for 2020 and we r in January! stop being a fool like ur media!

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
The results were released in 2020, that's what I meant. The figures nazo ni za 2019. I know kingereza ndio shida kwako.

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
see capital FM heading how did they get the value of 2020 in January? a forecast? 😀

Not surprised cause in Kenya projected r being launched before they exist!

 
Wapi wamesema hapo ni value ya 2020? We Mzee you need to attend English classes.

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
They said profit rose from kshs 3.3bln in 2019! In finance profit is counted on yearly basis! We r in 2020 unless there's another year btn 2019 n 2020 u sound stupid by keeping arguing!
 
They said profit rose from kshs 3.3bln in 2019! In finance profit is counted on yearly basis! We r in 2020 unless there's another year btn 2019 n 2020 u sound stupid by keeping arguing!
Between me and you who is stupid? Let me break it down for you kama kingereza ndio shida kwako. In 2018 SGR made ksh3b and in 2019 it made ksh8.8b. Soma hiyo tweet vizuri uelewe.



Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
and yet not electrified n SGR track not joint welded!

While Mombasa-Naivasha diesel SGR track length 609+120= 726 km is $3.8+1.5= $5.4 bln, our Dar-Makutupora SGR track length of over 700km (305km SGR I+409km SGR II) of electrified joint welded SGR is $3.1 (1.2 SGR I + 1.9 SGR II) bln as TL is not part of the TRC cost but part of Tanesco's costs! As for structures the Ruvu bridge across swampy Ruvu basin is 3 km n Dar viaduct is 2 km! As for tunnels there r also tunnels (whose lengths are T1 424 m, T2 1.031 m, T3 318 m and T4 847 m) for Morogoro -Makutupora with a total length of 2.6 km!
Nashangaa isn't Tanesco a government parastatal(?). Doesn't that mean it's the GOT that incurs it's costs? Mbona hujielewi?
Kenya has done a very big mistake to rush into SGR without much exploration about it.

You can not upgrade into electrified SGR while you struggle to get money to pay debt of the already running SGR.

It is going to take so long until you move out of that mess meanwhile the rest of landlocked countries are rushing to Tanzania to be part of the modern electrified SGR.

Truth be told, you always want to be ahead of others in EAC. when we started BRT system , you rushed into marking the roads with paint so that u can deploy this system and being in the frontline of modernity in EAC but you failed.

Now this SGR you rushed into, it is going to embarrass you when the first electrified SGR in EAC start working.




Sent from my iPhone using JamiiForums
Developed countries pia wamepaka rangi mfumo wao wa BRT.. What's your point? 😹
EJkn1u-WkAAJN5G.jpeg
 
Nashangaa isn't Tanesco a government parastatal(?). Doesn't that mean it's the GOT that incurs it's costs? Mbona hujielewi?

Developed countries pia wamepaka rangi mfumo wao wa BRT.. What's your point? 😹
yap but cost of power transmission that any other power transmission company supposed to meet! It is not the cost of buidling SGR!
 
yap but cost of power transmission that any other power transmission company supposed to meet! It is not the cost of buidling SGR!
You just don't get it? The line is dedicated to serve your SGR meaning technically the cost of building it is indeed part of your SGR. Isn't your SGR supposed to be electrified? When you add up all these associated costs then and ONLY then can you compare the true cost of your line vis a vis the Kenyan SGR
 
You just don't get it? The line is dedicated to serve your SGR meaning technically the cost of building it is indeed part of your SGR. Isn't your SGR supposed to be electrified? When you add up all these associated costs then and ONLY then can you compare the true cost of your line vis a vis the Kenyan SGR
Tanesco is legally obligated to do power transmission! There is around 5 transmission lines U/C around the country! Even if u factor in still ur 728 km SGR is way expensive than our 708 km electrical SGR!

Even that still ur diesel mtambo wa chang'aa is way expensive than electrical SGR in Tanzania
But why should transmission line cost be factored in the electrical SGR cost? Isn't transmission line the duty of an electrical company? Assuming we r factoring in the $150 mln for TL still the cost will be lower in comparison to ur diesel SGR! 1.2 bln + 1.9 bln=3.1+0.15= $3.25 bln! Then add says $400 mln for locomotives! then u get $3.65 bln for Dar-Makutupora (336+205) 541 km which less than the cost of $3.8 bln for Mombasa-Nrb diesel SGR of length 472 km!
Teargass Kafrican
 
Laggard, hanging basket technology has been in Tanzania since 1970s (during black n white photos era) across Mpanga river! Check TAZARA a replica of ur bridges n viaducts across Thika River!
17-mai-1974-tansania-uhuru-eisenbahn-fracht-strts-umzug-tansanische-premierminister-rashidi-kawowa-inspiziert-th-e10xga.jpg


Rovos_Rail_on_TAZARA_track_across_Mpanga_River.jpg


tazara-tanzania-zambia-railways-train-600w-1110130436.jpg

169611664.jpg


Some bridges with hanging basket technology across TAZARA
tazara-tanzania-zambia-railways-train-600w-1110130427.jpg

TAZARA.jpg



75324266_565683497526464_744052226611088366_n.jpg



On January 10, China State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi said this!
Buda hanging basket technology implies the method which the bridges are constructed.
 
Buda hanging basket technology implies the method which the bridges are constructed.

Even that still ur diesel mtambo wa chang'aa is way expensive than electrical SGR in Tanzania
But why should transmission line cost be factored in the electrical SGR cost? Isn't transmission line the duty of an electrical company? Assuming we r factoring in the $150 mln for TL still the cost will be lower in comparison to ur diesel SGR! 1.2 bln + 1.9 bln=3.1+0.15= $3.25 bln! Then add says $400 mln for locomotives! then u get $3.65 bln for Dar-Makutupora (336+205) 541 km which less than the cost of $3.8 bln for Mombasa-Nrb diesel SGR of length 472 km!
Teargass Kafrican
 
Buda hanging basket technology implies the method which the bridges are constructed.
so u r urguing with China's foreign minister? BTW the structure is the same right? 😀 😀 😀 😀
 
so u r urguing with China's foreign minister? BTW the structure is the same right? 😀 😀 😀 😀
The structures being the same is a non issue here. We are talking about HOW these structures were built.
 
Sawasawa Lyrical Waxer
yap $5.4 bln ($3.8bln phase I+ $1.5 phase 2A) for 728 km track length of diesel SGR vs 722 km ( $1.2 bln phase I 300km Dar-Morogoro + phase II $1.9 bln 422km Morogoro-Dodoma-Makutupora) Dar-Makutupora of electrical SGR for $3.1 bln!
 
The structures being the same is a non issue here. We are talking about HOW these structures were built.
u know than Chinese Foreign Minister the only thing different Chinese FM said is for the first time in History China could deploy 100% chinese made machines at Kenya SGR meaning during TAZARA machines from other nations were used!

The TAZARA Railway
Serve the revolutionary people of the world, 1971
Serve the revolutionary people of the world, 1971


The TAZARA railway (Tanzan Tielu 坦赞铁路) was designed and constructed between 1968 and 1976. The 1,860 km long project was built with financial and technical assistance from China, amounting to well over US$400 mn, in the form of a long-term interest-free loan. Known as the "Freedom Railway" or the Great Uhuru Railway, TAZARA was conceived to provide the critical outlet to the sea that landlocked Zambia needed in order to break free from its dependency on Rhodesian, Angolan and South African rails and ports. TAZARA was therefore a transnational as well as a Pan-African project, intended to serve as a symbol of revolutionary Third World solidarity and resistance to the forces of colonialism, neocolonialism and imperialism. The Chinese participation in this and other projects, which also included sending technical experts and doctors to Africa and granting Africans with scholarships for study in China, had less to do at the time with economic considerations than with political ones: it formed an obvious part of Beijing’s ideological strategy to counter the influence of the Soviet Union in (East) Africa. Moreover, the support of African countries was sought and needed to bolster Beijing’s attempts to reclaim its seat in the United Nations.

A link between Zambia and Tanzania had originally been envisaged by Cecil Rhodes but this imperial dream was never realized. Between 1963 and 1966 a number of feasibility studies for the construction of the line were conducted and requests for finance were submitted to Britain, the United States, Canada, West Germany, France, the Soviet Union, the World Bank, and the African Development Bank. But no firm offers were received from any of these and the Tanzanian and Zambian Governments therefore turned to China. After numerous discussions a Chinese team arrived in August 1965 to briefly study conditions of the Tanzanian section of the proposed project. In September 1967 a tripartite agreement was signed in Peking under which China undertook to make a full survey of the line and formally committed itself to build and finance the railway. Further negotiations between the three countries in April 1968 (Dar es Salaam) and November 1969 (Lusaka) led to the signing of the final agreement in July 1970 (Peking).

The cost of the railway was estimated at US$400 million and if the actual costs were higher than the extra sum would be given by China as a grant. The GBP400 million was provided in the form of an interest-free loan, since the Chinese never charged interest on any of the aid they provided. The loan would be repayable over thirty years, after a grace period of a decade, which meant that repayments would be due between the years 1983 and 2012. During the 1980s, a number of multi-national agreements, this time including Western donors as well, saw to it that the operational costs of the railway, acquisition of rolling stock and other expenses were met.

Construction of the railway began in April 1970 and work proceeded ahead of schedule with the track crossing into Zambia in August 1973. In terms of engineering, the construction was no small feat, particularly on the Tanzanian section where the track rises from sea level to almost 6,000 feet. All in all, 22 tunnels and 300 bridges needed to be built in Tanzania alone. Up to 15,000 Chinese and 45,000 African workers were engaged on the project during the peak period. The railway was completed in 1975 and operations began in July 1976.

The friendship road - the TANZAN Railway, 1976
The friendship road - the TANZAN Railway, 1976


Following the formal transfer of the railway in 1976, some 1,000 Chinese experts originating from 36 different railway "work units" (danwei) throughout China, stayed on in either Tanzania or Zambia as Chinese Railway Experts to continue the task of technology transfer in the operations period. These Experts Teams operated under the immediate leadership of the Chinese Embassy and its Economic and Commercial Representative in Tanzania. In China they were directly affiliated with the Department of Foreign Aid of the Ministry of Railways; after 2003, they were administered by the China Civil Engineering Construction Company (CCECC) under the authority of the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation (MOFTEC) and the Ministry of Commerce.

At present, TAZARA is still in operation, having survived falling revenues, maintenance backlogs, worker discontent over reduction and pension plans, etc. Its operating costs have been secured with a new infusion of Chinese financial aid (US$ 40 million in December 2010), leading to the projection that the operation will turn a profit in 2011, for the first time since the railway was taken into operation.

Although TAZARA is still seen as China’s most ambitious project in Africa, its functions have evolved from an ideo-political one into an economic one, emphasizing resource acquisition. In the process, the Chinese involvement has shifted from active participation in surveying and construction, to undertaking joint-management with the African partners, to providing management advice and technical guidance. As such, it very much reflects the past three decades’ developments and changes in China itself. On both ends of the railway, China has developed, or is in the process of developing, Special Economic Zones that will facilitate its further economic growth. Now that China is increasingly interested in economic cooperation with African nations, TAZARA serves as a powerful symbol of Beijing’s early and continuing commitment to and support for African nations.


Sources:
Martin Bailey (1975). "Tanzania and China", African Affairs 74/249

Martin Bailey (1975). "Chinese Aid in Action: Building the Tanzania-Zambia Railway". World Development 3:7-8

Martin Bailey, Freedom Railway: China and the Tanzania-Zambia Link (London: Collings, 1976)

Linda Jakobson (2009). "China’s diplomacy toward Africa: drivers and constraints". IRAP 9:3

Simon Katzenellenbogen (1974). "Zambia and Rhodesia: Prisoners of the Past: A Note on the History of Railway Politics in Central Africa". African Affairs 73:290

Liu Haifang & Jamie Monson (2011). "Railway Time: Technology Transfer and the Role of Chinese Experts in the History of TAZARA", Ton Dietz, Kjell Havnevik, Mayke Kaag, Terje Oestigaard (Eds), African Engagements - Africa Negotiating an Emerging Multipolar World (Leiden: Brill)

Jamie Monson, Africa's Freedom Railway: How a Chinese Development Project Changed Lives and Livelihoods in Tanzania (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009)

Sanusha Naidu & Daisy Mbazima (2008). "China–African relations: A new impulse in a changing continental landscape", Futures 40

Garth Shelton & Farhana Paruk (2008). The Forum on China–Africa cooperation - A strategic opportunity. ISS Monograph Series 156

Jeremy Youde (2012). "China's Health Diplomacy in Africa". China: An International Journal 8:1

 
So there is no existing TL from Kinyerezi to Morogoro? Electrification means dedicated TL for SGR! Where u not arguing about already existing TL in Tanzania? Can u substantiate that any TL at all was covered with that $4.4 bln SGR?

BTW what was that $240 mln signed for? Ni mnaibiwa kipumbavu hivyo?

However, Kenya Railways Corporation (KRC) managing director Mr Atanas Maina said in a television interview last month that the country lacks the reliability of supply needed to sustain the operation of an electrified railway. “It was something that we would love to have, however, the country does not have a dependable source of electricity,” he says.

Ketraco says power for the SGR will be provided by geothermal plants, reducing CO2 emissions from train operations to zero.

Electrification is due to be completed within 28 months.

Ah, nimeosha mkono, nimeshindwa kukuelimisha,kila nao jaribu ndo unazidi kuchanganyikiwa zaidi!!!!
 
Ah, nimeosha mkono, nimeshindwa kukuelimisha,kila nao jaribu ndo unazidi kuchanganyikiwa zaidi!!!!
I factored in that $150 mln for TL!
Even that still ur diesel mtambo wa chang'aa is way expensive than electrical SGR in Tanzania
But why should transmission line cost be factored in the electrical SGR cost? Isn't transmission line the duty of an electrical company? Assuming we r factoring in the $150 mln for TL still the cost will be lower in comparison to ur diesel SGR! 1.2 bln + 1.9 bln=3.1+0.15= $3.25 bln! Then add says $400 mln for locomotives! then u get $3.65 bln for Dar-Makutupora (336+205) 541 km which less than the cost of $3.8 bln for Mombasa-Nrb diesel SGR of length 472 km! And if u add up the cost of ur SGR phase 2A 120 km the cost jump to $5.3bln for 592km of diesel SGR!
Teargass Kafrican
 
Back
Top Bottom