COVID-19 Test Kits zilizogunduliwa kuwa na hitilafu kwingineko duniani siyo hizi za Magufuli

[Chige]

Suala hili niliwahi kuliandikia post mahali, lakini nimeonelea kulianzishia uzi ili kulifafanua kwa undani zaidi.

Katika kuhalalisha hoja ya JPM kulisha maparachichi na maboga test kits za COVID-19, Wafuasi wa JPM wamekuwa mara kwa mara wakitumia hoja kwamba hizi mashine sehemu nyingi duniani pia zilionekana kuwa na hitilafu!

Na kwavile hata kwa wenzetu zilionekana hizo hitilafu ndipo wana-conclude JPM yupo sahihi.

Kwa wanaoona taabu kusoma ngoja niwape muhtasairi kwa kusema kwamba, mashine zilizoonekana kuwa na hitilafu sehemu mbalimbali duniani sio hizi alizozikosoa JPM. Zilizoonekana kuwa na hitilafu ni Rapid Diagnostic Testing Kits kwa ajili ya antibody testing wakati alizozilisha maboga JPM ni Laboratory Testing Kits.

Kama huoni taabu kusoma, endelea na maelezo hapa chini.

Ni kweli nchi nyingi including the Ulaya zilirudisha au zililalamika kuhusu mapungufu ya hizo kits, na nchi hizo ni pamoja na UK, Uholanzi, Uturuki, India na zingine.

Tuanze na UK

Sawa na nchi zingine zilivyokuwa zimefanya mizaha, kama ambavyo JPM anaendeleza hiyo mizaha hadi kesho, kuja kushituka UK wakagundua coronavirus ameshasambaa nchini UK.

Out of desperation, UK wakaona kutgemea laboratory test peke yake itachelewesha sana kupata idadi ya maambukizi, na hapo ndipo wakaamua kuagiza Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits. Lengo la UK, ilikuwa ni kusambaza hizi kits kwa wingi ili wananchi waweze kujifanyia testing wao wenyewe kama ambavyo wanawake wanavyojifanyia pregnancy test wao wenyewe.

New York Times, April 16 waliripoti:-

LONDON — The two Chinese companies were offering a risky proposition: two million home test kits said to detect antibodies for the coronavirus for at least $20 million, take it or leave it.

Kabla hatujaendelea, unaona hapo wamesema kwamba ni home test kits...

Kisha The New York Times wanaendelea:-

Found to be insufficiently accurate by a laboratory at Oxford University, half a million of the tests are now gathering dust in storage. Another 1.5 million bought at a similar price from other sources have also gone unused.

Lakini kwavile wenzetu huwa hawang'ati maneno, The New York Times hawakuishia hapo na badala yake wakaongoza kilichosemwa na watalaamu kwamba:-

Doctors say the government’s descriptions of the antibody tests could also be misleading.

By comparing the antibody tests to pregnancy tests, officials seemed to be suggesting the antibody tests would determine whether a patient was currently infected. But a discernible level of antibodies may not appear in the blood until as long as 20 days after infection — meaning a person with the virus would test negative until then.

Hadi hapo utaona wazi kwamba hakuna haja ya mtu kuwa mtalaamu wa maabara kufahamu kwamba kits zilizoonekana kuwa na faults UK ni tofauti na hizi zilizolishwa oil na Magu.

Fuatilia source yoyote ya kueleweka kuhusu hizo UK kits, utakachoona na hicho hicho kilichoandikwa na The New York Times... Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits.

Na hapa tusisahau hizi Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits zinazalishwa in mass tofauti na zile lab kits ndo maana UK peke yake walinunua zaidi ya kits 2M.

Na hilo lilitokea wakati huko nyuma hapakuwa na hizi Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits for COVID-19 kwahiyo nyingi zilikuwa hata hazijawa approved huku mataifa tajiri wakitaka kuwa na stock ya kutosha kabla demand duniani haijawa kubwa zaidi; na Wachina wakatumia fursa kwa wanasiasa waliokuwa desperate.

Tuje kwa Spain!
EFE News Agency ambayo ni international news agency kutoka Spain wanaandika:-

The Ministry of Health has justified that the batch of rapid tests to detect coronaviruses that do not meet quality standards were purchased from a "trusted" national supplier, and offered "all guarantees" by having the CE mark, so it has rejected that there has been "negligence"

Hapo kwenye RED kwa mara nyingine utaona wanazungumzia rapid test kits.

EFE wanaendelea:-

This purchase, worth 509 million euros, includes 585 million masks, 11 million gloves, 5.5 million rapid tests and 1,114 assisted breathing equipment, to strengthen the capacity of ICUs across the country, he said.

Hpao tena wanazungumzia suala la rapid test kits, na kwa idadi kubwa namna hiyo unaweza kupata picha zIngetumika tumika vp kwa sababu pamoja na utajiri wao, I doubt kama watakuwa na labs nyingi namna hiyo; na badala yake, kuna uwezekano na wenyewe walitaka kuzifanya ziwe available everywhere kama ilivyo vipimo vya ujauzito.

Sina haja ya kuizungumzia desperation ya Spain manake kwa muda mrefu sana nimewazungumzia huku nikitoa mfano wa Dr. Fernando Simon, Dokta Mkuu wa Matibabu ya Dharula ambae wakati Italy inawaka moto, yeye kwa kujiamini kabisa akasema sio rahisi Spain kukumbwa na hilo na janga.

Again, pitia source yoyote ya kueleweka utaona nako wanazungumzia test kits ambazo Spain walikuwa wanalia lia kupigwa, ni Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits, aka Rapid Test Kits aka Antibody Test kits.

What about India?

Kibwagizo cha BBC kinasema"-

India has cancelled orders for about half a million coronavirus rapid testing kits from China after they were found to be "faulty".

Again, ni rapid testing kits.

Kisha BBC wanatutoa matongotongo kwamba:-

The rapid testing kits cannot test for coronavirus itself and several scientists have raised concerns over their use for diagnosis.

BBC yenye Waandishi wa Habari wana authority gani ya kusema hizo kits haziwezi ku-test coronavirus zenyewe kama zenyewe?

Shirika la Afya Duniani (WHO) wakitoa Scientific Briefing mwezi mmoja uliopita walianza na kibwagizo kwamba:-

In response to the growing COVID-19 pandemic and shortages of laboratory-based molecular testing capacity and reagents, multiple diagnostic test manufacturers have developed and begun selling rapid and easy-to-use devices to facilitate testing outside of laboratory settings.

Ukifanya majumuisho hapo kwenye RED na Bold Black utaona kumbe kuna laboratory based mlecular testing na rapid and easy to use devices aka rapid testing kits!

Sasa tafakari na jiulize zile kits zilizolishwa mafenesi na tukaambiwa hazitoi majibu sahihi ni laboratory-based-mlecular testing kits au rapid and easy to use devices?

Kwa kutambua pressure iliyopo, WHO wakawapongeza hao manufacturers wa hizo rapid testing kits lakini wakaendelea:-

However, before these tests can be recommended, they must be validated in the appropriate populations and settings. Inadequate tests may miss patients with active infection or falsely categorize patients as having the disease when they do not, further hampering disease control efforts. At present, based on current evidence, WHO recommends the use of these new point-of-care immunodiagnostic tests only in research settings. They should not be used in any other setting, including for clinical decision-making, until evidence supporting use for specific indications is available

Hiyo bold imewekwa na WHO wenyewe wakisema wazi kwamba hizo kits zisitumike kama ndio final say!

Here come another question! Kits zinazotumika Tanzania na hatimae kupewa sample za mbuzi na hivyo Wafuasi wa Magu kudai findings za Magu zipo right kwa sababu hata kwa wenzetu tatizo lilionekana. Je, ni kits ambazo hazijawa validated for clinical trials?

WHO wakatoa maelezo jinsi ya hizi rapid testing kits zinazovyofanya kazi na kutoa scientific estimation kwamba:-

Based on experience with antigen-based RDTs for other respiratory diseases such as influenza, in which affected patients have comparable concentrations of influenza virus in respiratory samples as seen in COVID-19, the sensitivity of these tests might be expected to vary from 34% to 80%.

Kumbe Sensitivity rate yake ni 34% to 80%.

Ukifanya homework mwenyewe utaona Spain walilalamika kwamba sensitivity ya hizo kits ni only 30% wakati wao walitarajia ingekuwa at least 80%!

Kisha WHO wakasisitiza:-

WHO does not recommend the use of antibody-detecting rapid diagnostic tests for patient care but encourages the continuation of work to establish their usefulness in disease surveillance and epidemiologic research.

Again, mnataka kutuambia WHO wameiacha Tanzania iwe inatumia kwenye maabara zake Rapid Diagnostic Testing Kits pamoja na kwamba walishatoa tahadhali huko nyuma kwamba hizi sio za kuzitumainia?!

Katika ulimwengu wa kibepari hata WHO wanaweza kununuliwa na China ili kutoa hayo maelezo hapo juu ili kuwanusuru China na aibu.

What about other sources?

Mwaka 2013, almost 7 years before COVID-19 tovuti ya Science Direct inaelezea Rapid Diagnostic Testing kwamba:-

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) can speed the etiologic diagnosis of infections in several scenarios (e.g., sepsis, respiratory tract infections, and meningitis). Interpretation of currently available RDTs is not always straightforward, and therefore, they cannot yet replace conventional tests. Institutional priorities, integration with laboratory workflow, and cost are issues that have to be considered when selecting RDTs to implement locally.

Again, ina maana testing kits zilizo kwenye mahabara zetu na kukosolewa na JPM ni kama zile ambazo long time zimeshaelezewa zisitumike kufanya final conclusion au ni laboratory testing kits?

Kuna uhusiano gani kati ya kits zilizorudishwa nchi zingine kiasi cha kutumika kama justification ya kwamba JPM yupo sahihi kwa sababu hata kwa wenzetu hizo kits zimeonekana zina hitilafu?!

JPM ni Mwana Kemia. Je, ametuambia findings zake zimeonesha sensitivity ya zile kits ni asilimia ngapi?

Hitimisho ni kwamba, mnaweza kuendelea kuwalisha ujinga watu kwamba hata Ulaya hizi kits zilionekana zina hitilafu lakini ukweli ni kwamba kits ambazo zilionekana zina hitilafu sio hjzi ambazo ni clinically validated, and approved.

Of course errors lazima ziwepo manake hakuna mashine iliyo 100% efficient. Hata hizi laboratory kits zinakuwa na acceptable margin of errors; kwa mfano, ziwe na Sensitivity ya 95%.

NOTE: Sina muda wa kufanya proofreading, so pardon any errors!

 

[Fredwash]

Chige,


This is the difference between JF and other social media platforms. We think, we analyze, we research, we make arguments, we share our findings and more importantly we stand to be corrected.

In the end we all have learned something

 

[Pain killer]

Pole sana
Hujitambui kijana,

Legeza ubongo

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[Chige]

Pole sana
Hujitambui kijana,

Legeza ubongo

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

Sina namna ya kukusaidia...

 

[Tz mbongo]

Kuna tofauti ya kukosoa na kutaka kuonesha kuwa mtu fulani hafai.

Kumchukia mtu ambaye huwezi kumfanya lolote ni sawa na kujiadhibu mwenyewe.

Siku zote ukishamuwekea mtu X basi huwezi kumzungumzia katika hali ya usawa.

 

[misasa]

Bado uanze zoezi la kupaa na UNGO tu usiku,mengine umejitahidi.

 

[MR. IBU]

Basi kuna watu wamenuna kwakuwa wameambiwa ukweli halisi.

 

[Idd Ninga]

Kuna wakati watu tunaanza kuamini kuwa ni kweli madaktari wengine wapo kama walisomea umeme badala ya utabibu.
Tafiti hutafitiwa,tafiti haiandikiwa tahakiki,tafiti siyo riawaya au diwani.

 

[Etwege]

Suala hili niliwahi kuliandikia post mahali, lakini nimeonelea kulianzishia uzi ili kulifafanua kwa undani zaidi.

Katika kuhalalisha hoja ya JPM kulisha maparachichi na maboga test kits za COVID-19, Wafuasi wa JPM wamekuwa mara kwa mara wakitumia hoja kwamba hizi mashine sehemu nyingi duniani pia zilionekana kuwa na hitilafu!

Na kwavile hata kwa wenzetu zilionekana hizo hitilafu ndipo wana-conclude JPM yupo sahihi.

Kwa wanaoona taabu kusoma ngoja niwape muhtasairi kwa kusema kwamba, mashine zilizoonekana kuwa na hitilafu sehemu mbalimbali duniani sio hizi alizozikosoa JPM. Zilizoonekana kuwa na hitilafu ni Rapid Diagnostic Testing Kits kwa ajili ya antibody testing wakati alizozilisha maboga JPM ni Laboratory Testing Kits.

Kama huoni taabu kusoma, endelea na maelezo hapa chini.

Ni kweli nchi nyingi including the Ulaya zilirudisha au zililalamika kuhusu mapungufu ya hizo kits, na nchi hizo ni pamoja na UK, Uholanzi, Uturuki, India na zingine.

Tuanze na UK

Sawa na nchi zingine zilivyokuwa zimefanya mizaha, kama ambavyo JPM anaendeleza hiyo mizaha hadi kesho, kuja kushituka UK wakagundua coronavirus ameshasambaa nchini UK.

Out of desperation, UK wakaona kutgemea laboratory test peke yake itachelewesha sana kupata idadi ya maambukizi, na hapo ndipo wakaamua kuagiza Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits. Lengo la UK, ilikuwa ni kusambaza hizi kits kwa wingi ili wananchi waweze kujifanyia testing wao wenyewe kama ambavyo wanawake wanavyojifanyia pregnancy test wao wenyewe.

New York Times, April 16 waliripoti:-
Kabla hatujaendelea, unaona hapo wamesema kwamba ni home test kits...

Kisha The New York Times wanaendelea:-Lakini kwavile wenzetu huwa hawang'ati maneno, The New York Times hawakuishia hapo na badala yake wakaongoza kilichosemwa na watalaamu kwamba:-Hadi hapo utaona wazi kwamba hakuna haja ya mtu kuwa mtalaamu wa maabara kufahamu kwamba kits zilizoonekana kuwa na faults UK ni tofauti na hizi zilizolishwa oil na Magu.

Fuatilia source yoyote ya kueleweka kuhusu hizo UK kits, utakachoona na hicho hicho kilichoandikwa na The New York Times... Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits.

Na hapa tusisahau hizi Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits zinazalishwa in mass tofauti na zile lab kits ndo maana UK peke yake walinunua zaidi ya kits 2M.

Na hilo lilitokea wakati huko nyuma hapakuwa na hizi Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits for COVID-19 kwahiyo nyingi zilikuwa hata hazijawa approved huku mataifa tajiri wakitaka kuwa na stock ya kutosha kabla demand duniani haijawa kubwa zaidi; na Wachina wakatumia fursa kwa wanasiasa waliokuwa desperate.

Tuje kwa Spain!
EFE News Agency ambayo ni international news agency kutoka Spain wanaandika:-
Hapo kwenye RED kwa mara nyingine utaona wanazungumzia rapid test kits.

EFE wanaendelea:-Hpao tena wanazungumzia suala la rapid test kits, na kwa idadi kubwa namna hiyo unaweza kupata picha zIngetumika tumika vp kwa sababu pamoja na utajiri wao, I doubt kama watakuwa na labs nyingi namna hiyo; na badala yake, kuna uwezekano na wenyewe walitaka kuzifanya ziwe available everywhere kama ilivyo vipimo vya ujauzito.

Sina haja ya kuizungumzia desperation ya Spain manake kwa muda mrefu sana nimewazungumzia huku nikitoa mfano wa Dr. Fernando Simon, Dokta Mkuu wa Matibabu ya Dharula ambae wakati Italy inawaka moto, yeye kwa kujiamini kabisa akasema sio rahisi Spain kukumbwa na hilo na janga.

Again, pitia source yoyote ya kueleweka utaona nako wanazungumzia test kits ambazo Spain walikuwa wanalia lia kupigwa, ni Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits, aka Rapid Test Kits aka Antibody Test kits.

What about India?

Kibwagizo cha BBC kinasema"-Again, ni rapid testing kits.

Kisha BBC wanatutoa matongotongo kwamba:-BBC yenye Waandishi wa Habari wana authority gani ya kusema hizo kits haziwezi ku-test coronavirus zenyewe kama zenyewe?

Shirika la Afya Duniani (WHO) wakitoa Scientific Briefing mwezi mmoja uliopita walianza na kibwagizo kwamba:-Ukifanya majumuisho hapo kwenye RED na Bold Black utaona kumbe kuna laboratory based mlecular testing na rapid and easy to use devices aka rapid testing kits!

Sasa tafakari na jiulize zile kits zilizolishwa mafenesi na tukaambiwa hazitoi majibu sahihi ni laboratory-based-mlecular testing kits au rapid and easy to use devices?

Kwa kutambua pressure iliyopo, WHO wakawapongeza hao manufacturers wa hizo rapid testing kits lakini wakaendelea:-Hiyo bold imewekwa na WHO wenyewe wakisema wazi kwamba hizo kits zisitumike kama ndio final say!

Here come another question! Kits zinazotumika Tanzania na hatimae kupewa sample za mbuzi na hivyo Wafuasi wa Magu kudai findings za Magu zipo right kwa sababu hata kwa wenzetu tatizo lilionekana. Je, ni kits ambazo hazijawa validated for clinical trials?

WHO wakatoa maelezo jinsi ya hizi rapid testing kits zinazovyofanya kazi na kutoa scientific estimation kwamba:-Kumbe Sensitivity rate yake ni 34% to 80%.

Ukifanya homework mwenyewe utaona Spain walilalamika kwamba sensitivity ya hizo kits ni only 30% wakati wao walitarajia ingekuwa at least 80%!

Kisha WHO wakasisitiza:-Again, mnataka kutuambia WHO wameiacha Tanzania iwe inatumia kwenye maabara zake Rapid Diagnostic Testing Kits pamoja na kwamba walishatoa tahadhali huko nyuma kwamba hizi sio za kuzitumainia?!

Katika ulimwengu wa kibepari hata WHO wanaweza kununuliwa na China ili kutoa hayo maelezo hapo juu ili kuwanusuru China na aibu.

What about other sources?

Mwaka 2013, almost 7 years before COVID-19 tovuti ya Science Direct inaelezea Rapid Diagnostic Testing kwamba:-Again, ina maana testing kits zilizo kwenye mahabara zetu na kukosolewa na JPM ni kama zile ambazo long time zimeshaelezewa zisitumike kufanya final conclusion au ni laboratory testing kits?

Kuna uhusiano gani kati ya kits zilizorudishwa nchi zingine kiasi cha kutumika kama justification ya kwamba JPM yupo sahihi kwa sababu hata kwa wenzetu hizo kits zimeonekana zina hitilafu?!

JPM ni Mwana Kemia. Je, ametuambia findings zake zimeonesha sensitivity ya zile kits ni asilimia ngapi?

Hitimisho ni kwamba, mnaweza kuendelea kuwalisha ujinga watu kwamba hata Ulaya hizi kits zilionekana zina hitilafu lakini ukweli ni kwamba kits ambazo zilionekana zina hitilafu sio hjzi ambazo ni clinically validated, and approved.

Of course errors lazima ziwepo manake hakuna mashine iliyo 100% efficient. Hata hizi laboratory kits zinakuwa na acceptable margin of errors; kwa mfano, ziwe na Sensitivity ya 95%.

NOTE: Sina muda wa kufanya proofreading, so pardon any errors!

Akili fupi inapojaribu kujadili mambo ya akili kubwa matokeo yake ni kutapika tu kama wa mleta mada

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[kurlzawa]

Uvccm hawawezi kukuelewa mkuu

 

[digba sowey]

Wewe naye mkuu naona bado hukuelewa hoja ya JPM, yeye hakusema kuwa findings zake ndio suruhu Bali alitoa kama wakeup call ili kuwataka wanasayansi wafanye utafiti ili wajue tatitzo liko wapi ikiwa vipimo vya kila sampuli inayopimwa inasoma positive,kwahiyo JPM ametoa changamoto ili wanasayansi wazame maabara watuambie kwanini aliyoyasema yeye yako vile

JPM ni hakili kubwa haiwezi kuwa challenged na hakili ndogo na hoja dhaifu kama hizi,rudi tena ukajipange mkuu

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[denooJ]

Mleta mada umekuja vizuri, umechambua vizuri sana, like umefanya reseach fulani hivi ya muda mfupi through mitandao.

Big up.

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[denooJ]

Wewe naye mkuu naona bado hukuelewa hoja ya JPM, yeye hakusema kuwa findings zake ndio suruhu Bali alitoa kama wakeup call ili kuwataka wanasayansi wafanye utafiti ili wajue tatitzo liko wapi ikiwa vipimo vya kila sampuli inayopimwa inasoma positive,kwahiyo JPM ametoa changamoto ili wanasayansi wazame maabara watuambie kwanini aliyoyasema yeye yako vile

JPM ni hakili kubwa haiwezi kuwa challenged na hakili ndogo na hoja dhaifu kama hizi,rudi tena ukajipange mkuu

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

Vipimo vya JPM havikuwa positive peke yake, nadhani hujaelewa vizuri kwenye aina za vipimo.

Kuna vya aina mbili;

1. Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits (zilizoonekana kuwa na mapungufu). na

2. Laboratory Test Kits. (ambazo JPM alizitumia kufanya uchunguzi wa papai).

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[guwe_la_manga]

yawezekana ukawa sahihi...ila JPM alishajipatia political mileage kwa ile speech,amezima ajenda zote za corona na yeye ndyo ameshikilia usukani wa siasa kwa sasa...na kibaya upinzani hauna platform kama ya JPM ili kuelezea facts hizi...all major mainstream medias zipo kiganjani mwa JPM humu JF wataishia kukusoma wachache,ukitaka wengi wakusome na wakuone nenda ITV au TBC and the likes...je ujasiri huo unao?
Ahahaha...kubali tu JPM for the time amewaweza...

 

[Dp800]

Vipimo vya JPM havikuwa positive peke yake, nadhani hujaelewa vizuri kwenye aina za vipimo.

Kuna vya aina mbili;

1. Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits (zilizoonekana kuwa na mapungufu). na

2. Laboratory Test Kits. (ambazo JPM alizitumia kufanya uchunguzi wa papai).

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

Mkuu nina swali dogo kuna watu special wameumbwa kugundua hitilafu kwenye mitambo?
Kama sivyo kwanini mwandishi akose hitilafu aliogundua JPM au kwa vile yeye sio mzungu ndio maana haaminiwi?

 

[Abdulhalim]

Good read.
Ungeacha tu facts ziongee badala ya kueka vionjo vya vijembe kwa wale wa upande wa ...

 

[Chige]

Akili fupi inapojaribu kujadili mambo ya akili kubwa matokeo yake ni kutapika tu kama wa mleta mada

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

What would I expect kutoka kwa mmoja wa wapumbavu wanaojaribu kutaka kuchangia mada iliyo juu ya uwezo wao!!

 

[Bombabomba]

Nawe pia chenga tu, hakili ndio nini! Hongera mtoa mada kwa kazi kubwa uliyofanya ya kusoma, kuelewa, kuunganisha, kuandika na kutuletea. Kumbe bado tuna watz wengi wenye uwezo mzuri wa kuchanganua mambo. MWENYEZI Mungu akubariki sana na Kukupa nguvu ya kutulisha utaalam.

Wewe naye mkuu naona bado hukuelewa hoja ya JPM, yeye hakusema kuwa findings zake ndio suruhu Bali alitoa kama wakeup call ili kuwataka wanasayansi wafanye utafiti ili wajue tatitzo liko wapi ikiwa vipimo vya kila sampuli inayopimwa inasoma positive,kwahiyo JPM ametoa changamoto ili wanasayansi wazame maabara watuambie kwanini aliyoyasema yeye yako vile

JPM ni hakili kubwa haiwezi kuwa challenged na hakili ndogo na hoja dhaifu kama hizi,rudi tena ukajipange mkuu

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[Chige]

Good read.
Ungeacha tu facts ziongee badala ya kueka vionjo vya vijembe kwa wale wa upande wa ...

Sio vijembe... mada inajibu hoja za Wafuasi wa JPM wanaosema "hizi" kits sehemu mbalimbali duniani zimeonekana kuwa na faults, kwahiyo hapakuwa na budi kuelezea hoja zao na uhalisia!

 

[YEHODAYA]

Mleta mada subiiri tume ya mabingwa iliyoundwa ilete majibu mbona unatapatapa?