If God knows the future (omniscient), can you change your destiny?

If God knows the future (omniscient), can you change your destiny?

Kiranga said:
Sniper wana uweo wa kujua 100% kwamba watapiga target kabla ya kupiga target?

Huyo aliyetabiri world cup alikuwa na ubakika 100% k2amba jua litachomoza siku ya fainali za World Cup?

Do you even understand what 100% is?

Unafahamu tofauti ya prediction na knowledge of the future?

Kama hujui binadamu mwenye uwezo wa kijua nitqchukua njia ya kukia au ya kushoto, kwa nini unasema "wako binadamu wenye uwezo huo, itakuwa mungu"?

Ina maana hapo ulikuwa unabwabwaja tu bila kujua unachoandika?

Kabla ya kusema mungu anajua nitachukua njia ya kulia au kushoto, unaweza kunithibitishia kwamba yupo at all?
Click to expand...

Sasa wewe labda ndo huelewi maana 100%...Mimialiyesema binadamu wana freewill unataka tena niseme kwamba ;kuna mtu anaweza kuhakikisha kwamba mtu fulani ambaye hajui ataenda wapi kwenye njia panda kuwa eventual ataenda wapi as if yako controlled or automated bila factors zozote.?

Kila kitu kina factors hata wanaojua kitachotokea baadae wanafanya ukokotozi akinifu uwezo ambao binadamu wengi tunaotumia 10% hatuna.

Still binadamu anaweza kuwa controlled vile vile ...may be si topic nyepesi.
 
Kiranga said:
Kabla ya kusema mungu anajua nitachukua njia ya kulia au kushoto, unaweza kunithibitishia kwamba yupo at all?
Click to expand...




Kwa wanao discuss uwepo wa Mungu Muumba wa vyote..ningeweza changia namna hii kama huyo ndugu yoka source therealtruth.org

The First Law of Thermodynamics

What is the truth of modern science regarding the origin of all matter in the universe? Do scientists tell us that it has always existed? Or have they determined that there was a moment in time in which all matter came into existence? The answer to the second question is, yes! But what is the proof that this is true?

The First Law of Thermodynamics is stated as follows: Matter and energy can be neither created nor destroyed. There are no natural processes that can alter either matter or energy in this way. This means that there is no new matter or energy coming into existence and there is no new matter or energy passing out of existence. All who state that the universe came into existence from nothing violate the first law of thermodynamics, which was established by the very scientific community who now seem willing to ignore it. In summary, this law plainly demonstrates that the universe, and all matter and energy within it, must have had a divine origin—a specific moment in which it was created by someone who was all-powerful.

With the coming of the Atomic Age, beginning with the discovery of radium in 1898 by Madame Curie, came the knowledge that all radioactive elements continually give off radiation. Consider! Uranium has an atomic weight of 238.0. As it decomposes, it releases a helium atom three times. Each helium atom has a weight of 4. With the new weight of 226.0, uranium becomes radium. Radium continues to give off additional atoms until eventually the end product becomes the heavy inert element called lead. This takes a tremendous amount of time. While the process of uranium turning into radium is very long, the radium turns into lead in 1,590 years.

What are we saying? There was a point in time when the uranium could not have existed, because it always breaks down in a highly systematic, controlled way. It is not stable like lead or other elements. It breaks down. This means there was a specific moment in time when all radioactive elements came into existence. Remember, all of them—uranium, radium, thorium, radon, polonium, francium, protactinium and others—have not existed forever. This represents absolute proof that matter came into existence or, in other words, matter has not always existed!

This flies directly in the face of evolutionary thought—that everything gradually evolved into something else. Here is the problem. You cannot have something slowly come into existence from nothing! Matter could not have come into existence by itself. No rational person could believe that the entire universe—including all of the radioactive elements that prove there was a specific time of beginning—gradually came into existence BY ITSELF!

Through your own efforts, try to build something—anything—from nothing. Even with your creative power engaged in the effort, you would never be able to do it. You will not be able—in a hundred lifetimes of trying—to produce a single thing from nothing! Then, can any doubter believe that everything in the entirety of the universe, in all of its exquisite detail, came into existence completely by itself? Be honest. Accept facts. This is proof that the existing natural realm demands the existence of a Great Creator!

The Second Law of Thermodynamics

The Second Law of Thermodynamics is best summarized by saying that everything moves toward disorder—or a condition known as entropy. This bears some explanation and we will consider several examples.

Remember that evolutionists teach that everything is constantly evolving into a higher and more complex order. In other words, they believe things continue to get better and better instead of worse and worse.

If water being heated on a stove is at 150 degrees Fahrenheit, and the burner is turned off, the temperature will drop instead of rise. It will move toward colder rather than hotter. If a ball is placed on a hill, it will always roll downhill and not uphill. Energy used to perform any particular task changes from usable energy to unusable in the performing of that task. It will always go from a higher energy level to a lower energy level—where less and less energy is available for use.

When applied to the universe, the second law of thermodynamics indicates that the universe is winding down—moving toward disorder or entropy—not winding up or moving toward more perfect order and structure. In short, the entire universe is winding down!

Even evolutionists admit that the theory of evolution and the second law of thermodynamics are completely incompatible with each other. Consider: “Regarding the second law of thermodynamics (universally accepted scientific law which states that all things left to themselves will tend to run down) or the law of entropy, it is observed, ‘It would hardly be possible to conceive of two more completely opposite principles than this principle of entropy increase and the principle of evolution. Each is precisely the converse of the other. As (Aldous) Huxley defined it, evolution involves a continual increase of order, of organization, of size, of complexity. It seems axiomatic that both cannot possibly be true. But there is no question whatever that the second law of thermodynamics is true’” (Morris, Henry M., The Twilight of Evolution, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1967, p. 35).

Like a top or a yo-yo, the universe must have been “wound up.” Since the universe is constantly winding down, the second law of thermodynamics looms before us in the form of a great question: Who wound it up? The only plausible answer is God!

The Great Proof of Creation

We have established that creation demands a Creator. The next few paragraphs introduce some amazing scientific proofs of creation.

The theory of evolution is shot full of inconsistencies. Evolutionists have seized on many theories, within the overall theory of evolution, in an attempt to explain the origins of plants, animals, the heavens and the earth.

Over and over, these “theorists” try to explain how life evolved from inanimate material into more complex life forms until it reached the pinnacle—human beings.

Yet, as one geologist wrote, “It must be significant that nearly all the evolutionary stories I learned as student…have been debunked” (Dr. Derek V. Ager, Dept. of Geology, Imperial College, London, The Nature of the Fossil Record, Proceedings of the Geological Assoc., Vol. 87, 1976, pp. 1132-1133).

Perhaps the biggest reason that so many theories within the overall theory of evolution collapse is because they contain terrible logic requiring great leaps in faith to believe. Here is one example of a “debunked” theory: “Many evolutionists have tried to argue that humans are 99% similar chemically to apes and blood precipitation tests do indicate that the chimpanzee is people’s closest relative. Yet regarding this we must observe the following: ‘Milk chemistry indicates that the donkey is man’s closest relative.’ ‘Cholesterol level tests indicate that the garter snake is man’s closest relative.’ ‘Tear enzyme chemistry indicates that the chicken is man’s closest relative.’ ‘On the basis of another type of blood chemistry test, the butter bean is man’s closest relative’” (Morris, Henry M., The Twilight of Evolution, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1967).
 
Demarco said:
Sasa wewe labda ndo huelewi maana 100%...Mimialiyesema binadamu wana freewill unataka tena niseme kwamba ;kuna mtu anaweza kuhakikisha kwamba mtu fulani ambaye hajui ataenda wapi kwenye njia panda kuwa eventual ataenda wapi as if yako controlled or automated bila factors zozote.?

Kila kitu kina factors hata wanaojua kitachotokea baadae wanafanya ukokotozi akinifu uwezo ambao binadamu wengi tunaotumia 10% hatuna.

Still binadamu anaweza kuwa controlled vile vile ...may be si topic nyepesi.
Click to expand...

100% knowledge inategemea factors tena?

Hiyo 100% gani iko dependent?

Unaelewa 100% ni nini kweli?

Kama inategemea other factors hapo kuna 100% au probability?

Unafahamu tofauti ya 100% na probability?
 
Demarco said:
Kwa wanao discuss uwepo wa Mungu Muumba wa vyote..ningeweza changia namna hii kama huyo ndugu yoka source therealtruth.org

The First Law of Thermodynamics

What is the truth of modern science regarding the origin of all matter in the universe? Do scientists tell us that it has always existed? Or have they determined that there was a moment in time in which all matter came into existence? The answer to the second question is, yes! But what is the proof that this is true?

The First Law of Thermodynamics is stated as follows: Matter and energy can be neither created nor destroyed. There are no natural processes that can alter either matter or energy in this way. This means that there is no new matter or energy coming into existence and there is no new matter or energy passing out of existence. All who state that the universe came into existence from nothing violate the first law of thermodynamics, which was established by the very scientific community who now seem willing to ignore it. In summary, this law plainly demonstrates that the universe, and all matter and energy within it, must have had a divine origin—a specific moment in which it was created by someone who was all-powerful.

With the coming of the Atomic Age, beginning with the discovery of radium in 1898 by Madame Curie, came the knowledge that all radioactive elements continually give off radiation. Consider! Uranium has an atomic weight of 238.0. As it decomposes, it releases a helium atom three times. Each helium atom has a weight of 4. With the new weight of 226.0, uranium becomes radium. Radium continues to give off additional atoms until eventually the end product becomes the heavy inert element called lead. This takes a tremendous amount of time. While the process of uranium turning into radium is very long, the radium turns into lead in 1,590 years.

What are we saying? There was a point in time when the uranium could not have existed, because it always breaks down in a highly systematic, controlled way. It is not stable like lead or other elements. It breaks down. This means there was a specific moment in time when all radioactive elements came into existence. Remember, all of them—uranium, radium, thorium, radon, polonium, francium, protactinium and others—have not existed forever. This represents absolute proof that matter came into existence or, in other words, matter has not always existed!

This flies directly in the face of evolutionary thought—that everything gradually evolved into something else. Here is the problem. You cannot have something slowly come into existence from nothing! Matter could not have come into existence by itself. No rational person could believe that the entire universe—including all of the radioactive elements that prove there was a specific time of beginning—gradually came into existence BY ITSELF!

Through your own efforts, try to build something—anything—from nothing. Even with your creative power engaged in the effort, you would never be able to do it. You will not be able—in a hundred lifetimes of trying—to produce a single thing from nothing! Then, can any doubter believe that everything in the entirety of the universe, in all of its exquisite detail, came into existence completely by itself? Be honest. Accept facts. This is proof that the existing natural realm demands the existence of a Great Creator!

The Second Law of Thermodynamics

The Second Law of Thermodynamics is best summarized by saying that everything moves toward disorder—or a condition known as entropy. This bears some explanation and we will consider several examples.

Remember that evolutionists teach that everything is constantly evolving into a higher and more complex order. In other words, they believe things continue to get better and better instead of worse and worse.

If water being heated on a stove is at 150 degrees Fahrenheit, and the burner is turned off, the temperature will drop instead of rise. It will move toward colder rather than hotter. If a ball is placed on a hill, it will always roll downhill and not uphill. Energy used to perform any particular task changes from usable energy to unusable in the performing of that task. It will always go from a higher energy level to a lower energy level—where less and less energy is available for use.

When applied to the universe, the second law of thermodynamics indicates that the universe is winding down—moving toward disorder or entropy—not winding up or moving toward more perfect order and structure. In short, the entire universe is winding down!

Even evolutionists admit that the theory of evolution and the second law of thermodynamics are completely incompatible with each other. Consider: “Regarding the second law of thermodynamics (universally accepted scientific law which states that all things left to themselves will tend to run down) or the law of entropy, it is observed, ‘It would hardly be possible to conceive of two more completely opposite principles than this principle of entropy increase and the principle of evolution. Each is precisely the converse of the other. As (Aldous) Huxley defined it, evolution involves a continual increase of order, of organization, of size, of complexity. It seems axiomatic that both cannot possibly be true. But there is no question whatever that the second law of thermodynamics is true’” (Morris, Henry M., The Twilight of Evolution, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1967, p. 35).

Like a top or a yo-yo, the universe must have been “wound up.” Since the universe is constantly winding down, the second law of thermodynamics looms before us in the form of a great question: Who wound it up? The only plausible answer is God!

The Great Proof of Creation

We have established that creation demands a Creator. The next few paragraphs introduce some amazing scientific proofs of creation.

The theory of evolution is shot full of inconsistencies. Evolutionists have seized on many theories, within the overall theory of evolution, in an attempt to explain the origins of plants, animals, the heavens and the earth.

Over and over, these “theorists” try to explain how life evolved from inanimate material into more complex life forms until it reached the pinnacle—human beings.

Yet, as one geologist wrote, “It must be significant that nearly all the evolutionary stories I learned as student…have been debunked” (Dr. Derek V. Ager, Dept. of Geology, Imperial College, London, The Nature of the Fossil Record, Proceedings of the Geological Assoc., Vol. 87, 1976, pp. 1132-1133).

Perhaps the biggest reason that so many theories within the overall theory of evolution collapse is because they contain terrible logic requiring great leaps in faith to believe. Here is one example of a “debunked” theory: “Many evolutionists have tried to argue that humans are 99% similar chemically to apes and blood precipitation tests do indicate that the chimpanzee is people’s closest relative. Yet regarding this we must observe the following: ‘Milk chemistry indicates that the donkey is man’s closest relative.’ ‘Cholesterol level tests indicate that the garter snake is man’s closest relative.’ ‘Tear enzyme chemistry indicates that the chicken is man’s closest relative.’ ‘On the basis of another type of blood chemistry test, the butter bean is man’s closest relative’” (Morris, Henry M., The Twilight of Evolution, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1967).
Click to expand...

If you use laws of physics you subject yourself to the limitation of the laws of physics.

Do hou even reakize what these limitations are?

Can hou prove that god exists?
 
Mkuu wa chuo said:
Unajua huwa nashangaa mbona jamaa anafanya hivyo, wakati jamaa namjua huwa sio wa kukubali kirahisi pote huwa ni mtu wa kujenga hoja hata ukienda kule siasani yupo fit, ila nimegundua Ishmael ni wa noma sana jamaa ana vitu adimu sana...
Click to expand...

Mkuu umenikumbusha habari ya Sangarara na vitu vyake adim!!!
Ha ha ha!!

Kiukweli namshukuru sana Mungu kwa ajili ya Ishmael, jamaa ana zaid ya vitu ADIM! Namsoma kwa karibu mno, na sometimes nasoma majibu yake hadi mara2 nipate kuelewa nini anasema!

Much respect brother Ishmael!!
Mungu akubariki sana.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kiranga said:
Sniper wana uweo wa kujua 100% kwamba watapiga target kabla ya kupiga target?

Huyo aliyetabiri world cup alikuwa na ubakika 100% k2amba jua litachomoza siku ya fainali za World Cup?

Do you even understand what 100% is?

Unafahamu tofauti ya prediction na knowledge of the future?

Kama hujui binadamu mwenye uwezo wa kijua nitqchukua njia ya kukia au ya kushoto, kwa nini unasema "wako binadamu wenye uwezo huo, itakuwa mungu"?

Ina maana hapo ulikuwa unabwabwaja tu bila kujua unachoandika?

Kabla ya kusema mungu anajua nitachukua njia ya kulia au kushoto, unaweza kunithibitishia kwamba yupo at all?
Click to expand...
Kiranga umekasirika?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
kaburungu said:
Mkuu umenikumbusha habari ya Sangarara na vitu vyake adim!!!
Ha ha ha!!

Kiukweli namshukuru sana Mungu kwa ajili ya Ishmael, jamaa ana zaid ya vitu ADIM! Namsoma kwa karibu mno, na sometimes nasoma majibu yake hadi mara2 nipate kuelewa nini anasema!

Much respect brother Ishmael!!
Mungu akubariki sana.
Click to expand...

Mkuu let us give all the glory to Jesus Christ.

Tupo Pamoja sanaaa
 
kaburungu said:
Mkuu umenikumbusha habari ya Sangarara na vitu vyake adim!!!
Ha ha ha!!

Kiukweli namshukuru sana Mungu kwa ajili ya Ishmael, jamaa ana zaid ya vitu ADIM! Namsoma kwa karibu mno, na sometimes nasoma majibu yake hadi mara2 nipate kuelewa nini anasema!

Much respect brother Ishmael!!
Mungu akubariki sana.
Click to expand...

Hakuna aliyethibitisha kuwapo kwa mungu bado.

Kama kuna uthibitisho huo hapa naomba uuweke.

Ndiyo maana habari nzima ya uwepo.wa mungu ni ua imani, si ya ujuzi.

Imani.hata Santa Claus watoto wanaamini.kwamba anakaa North Pole. That doesn't impress me.

Niambie unajua kwamba mungu yupo na unaweza kuthibitisha hilo.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kiranga said:
If you use laws of physics you subject yourself to the limitation of the laws of physics.

Do hou even reakize what these limitations are?

Can hou prove that god exists?
Click to expand...

MY GOD created the laws of Physics for you. The laws can not be greater than the one who created them. Kijana unajitia aibu hapa. Ndio maana laws haziwezi kumwelewa aliye ziweka, zitabakia kuwa inferior, ad infinitum,

Zaidi ya hapo, bado ulikimbia swali langu kuhusu "negative god" prove to me that he exist.

SWALI RAHISI:
Why do you want to know the existence of God?

Muulizeni hili swali.
 
kaburungu said:
Kiranga umekasirika?
Click to expand...

Hakuna mwenye ubongo wenye uwezo wa kufikia kiwango kinachotakiwa kunikasirisha hapa.

Kunikasirisha inabidi ufikie uwezo fulani wa akili, ambao sijauona bado hapa.

Do not mistake a passionate reply for anger.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kiranga said:
Hakuna aliyethibitisha kuwapo kwa mungu bado.

Kama kuna uthibitisho huo hapa naomba uuweke.

Ndiyo maana habari nzima ya uwepo.wa mungu ni ua imani, si ya ujuzi.

Imani.hata Santa Claus watoto wanaamini.kwamba anakaa North Pole. That doesn't impress me.

Niambie unajua kwamba mungu yupo na unaweza kuthibitisha hilo.
Click to expand...

SWALI RAHISI TU KWAKO:

Why do you want to know the existence of God?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Our Community

Regional Communities

Back
Top Bottom
Menu
Forums
New posts
Log in
Register