Jaji Ndunguru: Summons zitolewe kwa DCI, CDF na IGP waje kutoa ushahidi upande wa utetezi

[Waufukweni]

Mahakama Kuu kupitia kwa Jaji Dunstan Ndunguru imekataa ombi la mshtakiwa Tundu Lissu la kuwaita baadhi ya mashahidi wa utetezi katika Kesi ya Uhaini Na. 19605/2025, ikieleza kuwa ushahidi wao hauna umuhimu kwani wajibu wa kuthibitisha kosa ni wa Jamhuri.

Hata hivyo, Jaji Ndunguru ameagiza kutolewa kwa wito rasmi (summons) kwa Mkuu wa Majeshi (CDF), Mkuu wa Polisi (IGP) na DCI ili wafike Mahakamani kutoa ushahidi upande wa utetezi. Kesi imeahirishwa hadi Septemba 11, 2026

Fuatilia mwenendo wa Kesi ya Uhaini ya Lissu>> Heche: Nilikamatwa na Kusomewa Shtaka la Ugaidi la Kuchoma Vituo vya Mwendokasi Kimara hadi Magomeni

Uamuzi wa Mahakama Kuu

Jaji Ndunguru anaendelea kusoma uamuzi, anasema Mahakama imejiuliza endapo pingamizi ni la msingi.

Kifungu cha 281 cha CPA kinaeleza kuwa msajili atatoa summons kwa mashahidi waliotajwa wakati wa committal na tumeangalia ni kweli kwenye proceedings hakuna orodha ya mashahidi. Kutoorodheshwa mashahidi hakuwezi kutibiwa wakati wa usikilizwaji wa hoja za awali.

Tunakubaliana na upande wa mashtaka kwamba kutowataja mashahidi wakati wa committal hakutibiwi na kuwataja wakati wa usikilizwaji wa hoja za awali.

Kwa mujibu wa kifungu cha 314 cha CPA kinaipa Mahakama hiari ya kuruhusu mashahidi kuitwa kwa kuangalia umuhimu wa mashahidi hao.

Wakati mshtakiwa anasema anawataka hao mashahidi alisema anawataka waje waeleze kama walitishika au vinginevyo.

Katika kesi za jinai upande wa mashtaka ndio una wajibu wa kuthibitisha jinai na sio upande wa utetezi kuthibitisha utakatifu wake (innocence yake) hivyo Jamhuri ndio walikuwa na wajibu wa kuwaleta wao hao mashahidi kuja kuthibitisha na sio upande wa Jamhuri.

Mahakama inaona kwamba hakuna haja ya kuwaita mashahidi hao na ushahidi wao sio relevant katika kesi hii kwa upande wa utetezi.

Kuhusu Mkurugenzi wa Usalama wa Taifa aliyetoa ushahidi katika kesi ya Khatibu Ghandi aliitwa na Jamhuri na sio upande wa utetezi na ni msimamo wa kisheria kwamba kila kesi huamuliwa kutokana na mazingira yake.

Katika kesi ya Khatibu Ghandi Sheria hii ya sasa ya Usalama wa Taifa haikuwepo.

Mashahidi ambao hatujawagusa ni DCI, CDF na IGP wao tumeona ushahidi wao ni relevant, hivyo summons zitolewe ili waje kutoa ushahidi upande wa utetezi.

 

[Isenye]

Kingai anaweza kujikojolea tena

 

[fadhili muhala]

Je ikitokea hawatakuja je??

 

[antimatter]

DCI, CDF na IGP wao tumeona ushahidi wao ni relevant, hivyo summons zitolewe ili waje kutoa ushahidi upande wa utetezi.

Sawa, walete..
Mahojiano yanaweza kuwa marefu sana, kama ni watumiaji wa madawa wakumbuke kuyabeba kabisaa

 

[Mushkov]

Watakula vyuma mpaka watatamani ardhi ipasuke.

 

[Detective J]

Thise guys hawatokaa wakanyage🤣

 

[Kambaku]

Sasa kama hawa ni relevant kwann wale wengine wameachwa wasije.

 

[BIOTOXINS]

Hawa jamaa cna uhakika kama wataenda,na wasipoenda Sheria inasemaje ?

 

[Bagamoyo]

Watasema wakati wa examination in chief na cross examination nani huwatuma

Jaji Dunstan Nduguru - CDF Mkunda, IGP Wambura , DCI Kingai kuitwa kutoa ushahidi kesi ya Lissu, Samia, Dk Mpango na Majaliwa hawamo..​

Si mchezo kukumbana na Tundu Lissu, kujaribu kuotea hali itakuwaje tusome pale watumishi wa dola wanapokumbana defence lawyers mahiri kizimbani

N.B
WASOMAJI WA KESI INAYOENDELEA * ANGALIZO

Ili kuweza kufuatilia mwenendo wa kesi bila kutekwa na ushabiki, wala sarakasi zinazotokea mahakamani. Sikiliza cross examination ya kesi mojawapo nchini Kenya iliyopo ktk lugha ya Kiswahili
Ili kuweza kufuatilia mwenendo wa kesi bila kutekwa na ushabiki, wala sarakasi zinazotokea mahakamani. Sikiliza cross examination ya kesi mojawapo nchini Kenya iliyopo ktk lugha ya Kiswahili

TOKA MAKTABA
MARCH 2026
Nairobi, Kenya


Afisa Police Akubali Mapengo Muhimu Wakati wa cross-examonation (Uchunguzi Mtambuka) Katika Kesi ya Kushambuliwa ya Boniface Mwangi


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OI3zlLdGBqI
Wakili James Wanjeri alimhoji koplo wa polisi katika kesi inayoendelea inayomhusu mwanaharakati Boniface Mwangi, akifichua kutofautiana kukubwa katika maelezo ya upande wa mashtaka. Afisa huyo, Bw. Yano, aliiambia mahakama kwamba alijibu simu ya dharura saa 3:30 usiku na akafika muda mfupi baadaye, lakini alikiri kwamba hakujitambulisha katika eneo la tukio au kuthibitisha kama tukio hilo la kelele lilikuwa na leseni.

Koplo alikubali zaidi kwamba si kelele zote zinawakilisha kosa la jinai, na alithibitisha kwamba hakuna hatua zilizochukuliwa kupima viwango vya kelele au kuthibitisha uhalali wa mkutano huo. Kuhusu madai mazito zaidi, afisa huyo alikiri kwamba matamshi ya kukera ya mshtakiwa yalikuwa ya jumla na hayakuelekezwa kwa afisa yeyote maalum.

Ushahidi wake kuhusu shambulio hilo linalodaiwa pia uliibua maswali, kwani alidai glasi ilirushwa kwa afisa—lakini glasi hiyo haikutolewa mahakamani.

Alikiri zaidi kwamba licha ya uwepo wa wahudhuriaji 60–70, hakuna mashahidi huru walioitwa, hakuna taarifa zilizorekodiwa kutoka kwa umma, na hakuna kumbukumbu za simu au ingizo la OB lililotolewa kuhusu malalamiko ya awali—mapengo ambayo upande wa utetezi unasema yanadhoofisha kesi ya upande wa mashtaka kwa kiasi kikubwa.

Officer Concedes Key Gaps During Cross-Examination in Boniface Mwangi Assault Trial

Lawyer James Wanjeri mounted a sharp cross-examination of a police corporal in the ongoing case involving activist Boniface Mwangi, exposing major inconsistencies in the prosecution’s account. The officer, Mr. Yano, told the court he responded to a distress call at 9:30 p.m. and arrived shortly after, but admitted he never introduced himself at the scene or verified whether the alleged noisy event was licensed. He further conceded that not all noise amounts to a criminal offence, and confirmed no steps were taken to measure the noise levels or establish the legality of the gathering

On the more serious allegations, the officer acknowledged that the accused’s alleged offensive remarks were general and not directed at any specific officer. His testimony on the alleged assault also raised questions, as he claimed a glass was thrown at an officer—yet the glass was never produced in court. He further admitted that despite the presence of 60–70 attendees, no independent witnesses were called, no statements were recorded from members of the public, and no call logs or OB entry were made regarding the initial complaint—gaps the defence argues significantly weaken the prosecution’s case.

KUJIONGEZA UWEZO WA KUFUATILIA MTIFUANO WA KISHERIA MAHAKAMANI BILA USHABIKI



Tujufunze jinsi ya kufuatilia mwenendo wa kesi kwa kuangalia kwa umakini ushahidi unaotolewa na pia cross examination kama zimejikita katika kuipa uzito chargesheet, au zimeshindwa kujikita ktk mambo ya msingi katika hati ya mashtaka yaani chargesheet. Hapa chini ni elimu na nyenzo za kukuwezesha kufuatilia mwenendo wa mashauri mahakamani ukiwa na fikra huru:


08 October 2025
Nairobi, Kenya
Lawyer John Maina Grills Cop Who Accused Boniface Mwangi of Assaulting Him

View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-_PjSaxUWuk
Lawyer John Maina on Wednesday intensely cross-examined a police officer who accused activist Boniface Mwangi of assaulting him during an April 2025 altercation at Mwangi’s Sema Ukweli offices in Kilimani. The officer claimed Mwangi attacked him while resisting arrest, but the defense disputed this, alleging the officer was intoxicated and attempted to draw his firearm. Maina questioned inconsistencies in the officer’s account and suggested the police were covering up an assault against Mwangi. The case, which has drawn public attention, continues before the Kibera Law Courts.
Source : Court Helicopter

N.B

A chargesheet is the final investigative report filed by law enforcement to show a magistrate that enough concrete evidence exists to start a criminal trial.

Role of Concrete Evidence :

Foundation: The report relies on gathered proof like witness statements, forensic tests, and digital media.

Not Proof of Guilt: The document reflects the officer's opinion based on findings, not a final conviction.

Court Review: A judge evaluates the listed facts to formally frame charges and begin proceedings



View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NccKrdx5VR8

During an intense cross-examination, defence lawyer Shadrack Wambui cast serious doubt on the credibility and competence of cyber-forensic analyst Juma Mwajirani, whose report forms part of the evidence against political commentator Nuru Okanga.Wambui began by asking Mwajirani to state the specific charges Okanga faced. The analyst initially relied on a DCI request letter that cited publication of false information and cyber harassment, but later retracted his answer, admitting he did not actually know the charges.

Lawyer Shadrack Wambui Dismantles Cyber forensic Analyst in Nuru Okanga’s Case


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fGvmL6yviqA

key facts, including whether he knew that Rigathi Gachagua is a former District Officer and former Deputy President details he conceded he did not know. When questioned about his understanding of “inflammatory” content, Mwajirani added that he does not know how to use a gun and that “not everyone shot with a gun dies,” a statement that raised concerns over the basis of his analysis.

On the technical front, the analyst confirmed that TikTok and YouTube accounts can be created without Gmail, acknowledged that the videos in question were posted by Diff Media and Riba News, yet admitted he did not access or identify the owners of those accounts. Of the 22 comments under the videos, he included only three in his report prompting Wambui to question whether the investigation was selectively conducted.

Wambui also highlighted a glaring discrepancy: the DCI request letter used by Mwajirani was dated 2023, even though the case pertains to 2024. The defence argued that such inconsistencies reflect a poorly handled and unreliable investigation.

26 November 2025
Lawyer Abner Mango Discredits Cyber Analyst Over Flawed Report in Nuru Okanga’s Case

View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=F4HV4Bo0L6w
Defence lawyer Abner Mango, together with other lawyers representing Nuru Okanga, challenged the credibility of analyst Juma Mwajirani’s report, arguing it was incomplete and selectively focused on Riba News while ignoring Diff Media, despite both being linked to the disputed video.

Mango questioned why Mwajirani did not investigate who owns the accounts or whether Okanga had any connection to them.

The defence also raised concerns about the handling of Okanga’s seized phone. Mwajirani admitted he never examined the device, checked for malware, or verified whether other users could access it gaps the defence argued undermine the integrity and reliability of his analysis.


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CJNiDPTw66E

cyber forensic expert’s report in the case against political commentator Nuru Okanga was severely weakened today after a blistering cross-examination by defence lawyer Hon. Babu Owino.Cyber and digital forensic analyst Juma Mwajirani came under intense scrutiny as Babu methodically poked holes in both his qualifications and his conclusions. The defence questioned the credibility of Mwajirani’s certification, pointing out that the institution he cited does not issue forensic analyst credentials.Babu further discredited the report by highlighting glaring inconsistencies—among them, the use of a 2023 reference letter to support an investigation conducted in 2024

02 July 2026

Deal Ruthlessly With DCI.Orengo Tough Question to Ruto DCI Officer In Court While Representing Bob

View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZH5rUg3NSGs

Source : Court Helicopter

 

[Tlaatlaah]

Mahakama Kuu kupitia kwa Jaji Dunstan Ndunguru imekataa ombi la mshtakiwa Tundu Lissu la kuwaita baadhi ya mashahidi wa utetezi katika Kesi ya Uhaini Na. 19605/2025, ikieleza kuwa ushahidi wao hauna umuhimu kwani wajibu wa kuthibitisha kosa ni wa Jamhuri.

Hata hivyo, Jaji Ndunguru ameagiza kutolewa kwa wito rasmi (summons) kwa Mkuu wa Majeshi (CDF), Mkuu wa Polisi (IGP) na DCI ili wafike Mahakamani kutoa ushahidi upande wa utetezi. Kesi imeahirishwa hadi Septemba 11, 2026


Uamuzi wa Mahakama Kuu


Jaji Ndunguru anaendelea kusoma uamuzi,
anasema Mahakama imejiuliza endapo pingamizi ni la msingi.

Kifungu cha 281 cha CPA kinaeleza kuwa msajili atatoa summons kwa mashahidi waliotajwa wakati wa committal na tumeangalia ni kweli kwenye proceedings hakuna orodha ya mashahidi. Kutoorodheshwa mashahidi hakuwezi kutibiwa wakati wa usikilizwaji wa hoja za awali.

Tunakubaliana na upande wa mashtaka kwamba kutowataja mashahidi wakati wa committal hakutibiwi na kuwataja wakati wa usikilizwaji wa hoja za awali.

Kwa mujibu wa kifungu cha 314 cha CPA kinaipa Mahakama hiari ya kuruhusu mashahidi kuitwa kwa kuangalia umuhimu wa mashahidi hao.

Wakati mshtakiwa anasema anawataka hao mashahidi alisema anawataka waje waeleze kama walitishika au vinginevyo.

Katika kesi za jinai upande wa mashtaka ndio una wajibu wa kuthibitisha jinai na sio upande wa utetezi kuthibitisha utakatifu wake (innocence yake) hivyo Jamhuri ndio walikuwa na wajibu wa kuwaleta wao hao mashahidi kuja kuthibitisha na sio upande wa Jamhuri.

Mahakama inaona kwamba hakuna haja ya kuwaita mashahidi hao na ushahidi wao sio relevant katika kesi hii kwa upande wa utetezi.

Kuhusu Mkurugenzi wa Usalama wa Taifa aliyetoa ushahidi katika kesi ya Khatibu Ghandi aliitwa na Jamhuri na sio upande wa utetezi na ni msimamo wa kisheria kwamba kila kesi huamuliwa kutokana na mazingira yake.

Katika kesi ya Khatibu Ghandi Sheria hii ya sasa ya Usalama wa Taifa haikuwepo.

Mashahidi ambao hatujawagusa ni DCI, CDF na IGP wao tumeona ushahidi wao ni relevant, hivyo summons zitolewe ili waje kutoa ushahidi upande wa utetezi.

ok.🐒

 

[hp4510]

Mahakama Kuu kupitia kwa Jaji Dunstan Ndunguru imekataa ombi la mshtakiwa Tundu Lissu la kuwaita baadhi ya mashahidi wa utetezi katika Kesi ya Uhaini Na. 19605/2025, ikieleza kuwa ushahidi wao hauna umuhimu kwani wajibu wa kuthibitisha kosa ni wa Jamhuri.

Hata hivyo, Jaji Ndunguru ameagiza kutolewa kwa wito rasmi (summons) kwa Mkuu wa Majeshi (CDF), Mkuu wa Polisi (IGP) na DCI ili wafike Mahakamani kutoa ushahidi upande wa utetezi. Kesi imeahirishwa hadi Septemba 11, 2026


Uamuzi wa Mahakama Kuu


Jaji Ndunguru anaendelea kusoma uamuzi,
anasema Mahakama imejiuliza endapo pingamizi ni la msingi.

Kifungu cha 281 cha CPA kinaeleza kuwa msajili atatoa summons kwa mashahidi waliotajwa wakati wa committal na tumeangalia ni kweli kwenye proceedings hakuna orodha ya mashahidi. Kutoorodheshwa mashahidi hakuwezi kutibiwa wakati wa usikilizwaji wa hoja za awali.

Tunakubaliana na upande wa mashtaka kwamba kutowataja mashahidi wakati wa committal hakutibiwi na kuwataja wakati wa usikilizwaji wa hoja za awali.

Kwa mujibu wa kifungu cha 314 cha CPA kinaipa Mahakama hiari ya kuruhusu mashahidi kuitwa kwa kuangalia umuhimu wa mashahidi hao.

Wakati mshtakiwa anasema anawataka hao mashahidi alisema anawataka waje waeleze kama walitishika au vinginevyo.

Katika kesi za jinai upande wa mashtaka ndio una wajibu wa kuthibitisha jinai na sio upande wa utetezi kuthibitisha utakatifu wake (innocence yake) hivyo Jamhuri ndio walikuwa na wajibu wa kuwaleta wao hao mashahidi kuja kuthibitisha na sio upande wa Jamhuri.

Mahakama inaona kwamba hakuna haja ya kuwaita mashahidi hao na ushahidi wao sio relevant katika kesi hii kwa upande wa utetezi.

Kuhusu Mkurugenzi wa Usalama wa Taifa aliyetoa ushahidi katika kesi ya Khatibu Ghandi aliitwa na Jamhuri na sio upande wa utetezi na ni msimamo wa kisheria kwamba kila kesi huamuliwa kutokana na mazingira yake.

Katika kesi ya Khatibu Ghandi Sheria hii ya sasa ya Usalama wa Taifa haikuwepo.

Mashahidi ambao hatujawagusa ni DCI, CDF na IGP wao tumeona ushahidi wao ni relevant, hivyo summons zitolewe ili waje kutoa ushahidi upande wa utetezi.

To me hii ni habari mbaya kwa lissu

Hao jamaa kama wote wataenda mahakamani then lissu haponi

Mpaka mahakama imeamua hivyo means wamekubali kwenda na wataenda

That's is sad news

 

[hp4510]

Thise guys hawatokaa wakanyage🤣

Wataenda trust me

 

[Mad Max]

Hawa jamaa cna uhakika kama wataenda,na wasipoenda Sheria inasemaje ?

Hawawezi kwenda.

 

[MtamaMchungu]

Je ikitokea hawatakuja je??

Hawawezi kuacha kuja...kinachoweza kutokea ni serikali kukata rufaa, ila kuacha kwenda hawawezi.

 

[peno hasegawa]

Jaji Ndunguru ameagiza kutolewa kwa wito rasmi (summons) kwa Mkuu wa Majeshi (CDF), Mkuu wa Polisi (IGP) na DCI ili wafike Mahakamani kutoa ushahidi upande wa utetezi. Kesi imeahirishwa hadi Septemba 11, 2026

Sasa ndio kesi ya Lissu itakuwa tamu, Sasa wananchi wakae mkao wa kula plau, kuona ulinzi na usalama wa nchi inaendeshwa na viongozi ambao upstairs kukoje!

 

[Sozo_]

To me hii ni habari mbaya kwa lissu

Hao jamaa kama wote wataenda mahakamani then lissu haponi

Mpaka mahakama imeamua hivyo means wamekubali kwenda na wataenda

That's is sad news

Kwa akili yako unafikiri Lissu mjinga kutaka hao waje watoe ushahidi?

 

[HOST NOT FOUND]

To me hii ni habari mbaya kwa lissu

Hao jamaa kama wote wataenda mahakamani then lissu haponi

Mpaka mahakama imeamua hivyo means wamekubali kwenda na wataenda

That's is sad news

How is it sad news?

 

[peno hasegawa]

CDF na IGP Lissu ana hamu nao,kwa kweli, Sasa Serikali inaanza msiba mwingine wa viongozi kuaibika mchana kweupe!

 

[Satoh Hirosh]

To me hii ni habari mbaya kwa lissu

Hao jamaa kama wote wataenda mahakamani then lissu haponi

Mpaka mahakama imeamua hivyo means wamekubali kwenda na wataenda

That's is sad news

Hamna habar mbaya kwa Lissu hapa, mkuu.

Hao jamaa hawawezi kulala kwa amani kuanzia sasa baada ya kusikia hii taarifa.

Lissu anafurahisha akiwa anamuhoji adui yako tu...ikifika zamu yako kuingia kwenye 18 zake unakuwa kama unaingia kwenye chumba cha kukata govi alafu bila ganzi... Huwezi kupata utulivu wa mwili Wala akili.

Hawa wanaweza kuacha ndala na kuingia mitini we subiri uone.

 

[Bagamoyo]

WAKUU WA VYOMBO NA IDARA ZAKE

CDF Jacob John Mkunda

IGP Camillius Wambura

DCI Ramadhani Kingai