Je, inawezekana mtu akalala na mwenye UKIMWI tena peku na asipate UKIMWI?

Je, inawezekana mtu akalala na mwenye UKIMWI tena peku na asipate UKIMWI?

Chakochangu said:
Ushapakua hicho kitabu? Kama bado ,jinsi ya kupakua ,nenda search engine yoyote andika kama ifuatavyo Dr. Leonard G Holowitz,Emerging Viruses Aids & Ebola ,download mwisho gonga enter. Vitatoka vielelezo vya machapisho yake mengi,tafuta ambayo mwanzo imeandikwa (pdf). Nyonya hap


Dr. Rath Health Foundation Dr. Rath Health Foundation
Stop the AIDS Genocide of the Drug Cartel
The truth about ARVs – and what their promoters
don't want you to know
Questions and Answers
About Aids:
Does HIV exist?
Does HIV cause AIDS?
Does everyone who is diagnosed "HIV-positive" develop AIDS?
For more Q&As click here.
More information
Click here to read Dr. Raxit Jariwalla's biography.
Potential beneficiaries for whom these web pages were built: More
For 25 years, the promoters of anti-retroviral (ARV) drugs have been advocating these drugs as the treatment of choice for AIDS with claims of life-saving and life-prolonging properties. The promoters of these claims include certain media, ARV-supporters among the clinical community, activist groups as well as politicians around the world.
However, the scientific validity and truth of these ARV-related health claims has never been proven in well-controlled, long-term scientific studies. Moreover, the promoters of these drugs never had to defend these claims in court and under oath.
That has now changed. In 2007, a case brought against the British newspaper the Guardian presented for the first time the opportunity to challenge these claims in a court.
The exchange of scientific arguments about the value of ARVs in AIDS treatment also provided the Guardian and its scientific advisors – collectively described here after as "the ARV defendants" – with a chance to defend their position in sworn testimony.
Following is a summary of the key arguments from the historic scientific exchange that took place during this court case. As the several hundred pages of court documents on these web pages show, the ARV defendants were unable to defend the falsity of some of the key claims they have been advancing for a quarter of a century.
The truth regarding the clinical and scientific limitations of ARV drugs are presented below.
These web pages are provided as a service to AIDS patients, doctors, scientists, insurance companies and governments around the world who have to take decisions relating to this health challenge.
The promoters of ARV drugs infer that they cure AIDS. The truth is that ARVs are not a cure for AIDS. Click here to read more.
The promoters of ARV drugs say that they are "life-saving" and that they "prolong life". The truth is that even after a quarter of a century there is no controlled long-term clinical proof that they increase survival. Click here to read more.
The promoters of ARV drugs describe them as "safe". The truth is that ARVs have serious side effects, including damage to the immune system. Click here to read more.
The promoters of ARV drugs say that they help to "improve the immune system". The truth is that ARVs can potentially cause drug-induced deficiency. Click here to read more.
The promoters of ARV drugs consistently refer to "HIV/AIDS", thus deliberately creating the perception that there is a deadly threat to any HIV infected person unless they take ARVs. The truth is that it takes 9 to 10 years from HIV infection to the development of AIDS. Click here to read more.
The promoters of ARV drugs say that "without access to antiretroviral therapy, people living with HIV/AIDS cannot attain the fullest possible physical and mental health". The truth is that optimal treatment depends on agents that slow disease. Click here to read more.
The promoters of ARV drugs say that "good nutrition is important, but vitamin C is unlikely to prove to be better than medication." The truth is that HIV infection and AIDS are linked to nutritional deficiencies. Click here to read more.
The promoters of ARV drugs say "there is no evidence that, taken alone, micronutrient supplements prevent HIV disease progression." The truth is that the clinical benefits of micronutrient supplements have been demonstrated in HIV/AIDS. Click here to read more.
The promoters of ARV drugs say that "more research is needed to examine the micronutrient needs of people living with HIV/AIDS and the best role for micronutrient supplements in HIV/AIDS infected populations." The truth is that the pharma industry is biased against micronutrients. Click here to read more.

Click here to sign up for our Newsletter!

Page Tools:
Print This Page!
Inform A Friend!
Bookmark This Page!
Contact

What's New:
New study proves heart failure drug digoxin INCREASES risk of death: The time to consider natural alternatives is NOW!
The Benefits of Micronutrients in Heart Failure
Accuracy of articles on Wikipedia: Serious questions continue to be raised
Study finds women who consume fish-liver oil in adolescence or midlife have reduced risk of coronary heart disease when older
PRESS RELEASE: End of heart disease now possible – New study proves atherosclerosis is early form of scurvy
New study shows supplements of B vitamins and omega-3 can stop development of Alzheimer's disease

© 2015 by Dr. Rath Health Foundation
About Us!
Contact Us!
Print This Page!
Inform A Friend!
Bookmark This Page!
RSS Feed
The Health Organization Founded by Dr. Rath is Unique in the World: All the Profits it Makes Go to a Non-profit Foundation. Read More.o
Click to expand...

Mkuu ile aya kwa juu ifanyie kazi. Hii nyingine imekujs kimakosa. Lakini yote ni yaleyale,ipitie pia.
 
Chakochangu said:
Ushapakua hicho kitabu? Kama bado ,jinsi ya kupakua ,nenda search engine yoyote andika kama ifuatavyo Dr. Leonard G Holowitz,Emerging Viruses Aids & Ebola ,download mwisho gonga enter. Vitatoka vielelezo vya machapisho yake mengi,tafuta ambayo mwanzo imeandikwa (pdf). Nyonya hapDr. Rath Health Foundation Dr. Rath Health Foundation
Stop the AIDS Genocide of the Drug Cartel
The truth about ARVs – and what their promoters
don’t want you to know
Questions and Answers
About Aids:
Does HIV exist?
Does HIV cause AIDS?
Does everyone who is diagnosed “HIV-positive” develop AIDS?
For more Q&As click here.
More information
Click here to read Dr. Raxit Jariwalla's biography.
Potential beneficiaries for whom these web pages were built: More
For 25 years, the promoters of anti-retroviral (ARV) drugs have been advocating these drugs as the treatment of choice for AIDS with claims of life-saving and life-prolonging properties. The promoters of these claims include certain media, ARV-supporters among the clinical community, activist groups as well as politicians around the world.
However, the scientific validity and truth of these ARV-related health claims has never been proven in well-controlled, long-term scientific studies. Moreover, the promoters of these drugs never had to defend these claims in court and under oath.
That has now changed. In 2007, a case brought against the British newspaper the Guardian presented for the first time the opportunity to challenge these claims in a court.
The exchange of scientific arguments about the value of ARVs in AIDS treatment also provided the Guardian and its scientific advisors – collectively described here after as “the ARV defendants” – with a chance to defend their position in sworn testimony.
Following is a summary of the key arguments from the historic scientific exchange that took place during this court case. As the several hundred pages of court documents on these web pages show, the ARV defendants were unable to defend the falsity of some of the key claims they have been advancing for a quarter of a century.
The truth regarding the clinical and scientific limitations of ARV drugs are presented below.
These web pages are provided as a service to AIDS patients, doctors, scientists, insurance companies and governments around the world who have to take decisions relating to this health challenge.
The promoters of ARV drugs infer that they cure AIDS. The truth is that ARVs are not a cure for AIDS. Click here to read more.
The promoters of ARV drugs say that they are “life-saving” and that they “prolong life”. The truth is that even after a quarter of a century there is no controlled long-term clinical proof that they increase survival. Click here to read more.
The promoters of ARV drugs describe them as “safe”. The truth is that ARVs have serious side effects, including damage to the immune system. Click here to read more.
The promoters of ARV drugs say that they help to “improve the immune system”. The truth is that ARVs can potentially cause drug-induced deficiency. Click here to read more.
The promoters of ARV drugs consistently refer to “HIV/AIDS”, thus deliberately creating the perception that there is a deadly threat to any HIV infected person unless they take ARVs. The truth is that it takes 9 to 10 years from HIV infection to the development of AIDS. Click here to read more.
The promoters of ARV drugs say that “without access to antiretroviral therapy, people living with HIV/AIDS cannot attain the fullest possible physical and mental health”. The truth is that optimal treatment depends on agents that slow disease. Click here to read more.
The promoters of ARV drugs say that “good nutrition is important, but vitamin C is unlikely to prove to be better than medication.” The truth is that HIV infection and AIDS are linked to nutritional deficiencies. Click here to read more.
The promoters of ARV drugs say “there is no evidence that, taken alone, micronutrient supplements prevent HIV disease progression.” The truth is that the clinical benefits of micronutrient supplements have been demonstrated in HIV/AIDS. Click here to read more.
The promoters of ARV drugs say that “more research is needed to examine the micronutrient needs of people living with HIV/AIDS and the best role for micronutrient supplements in HIV/AIDS infected populations.” The truth is that the pharma industry is biased against micronutrients. Click here to read more.


👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇

t 'll take tym 4me kuanza kukisoma icho kitab"" ntaxoma nikiwa na mda wakutosha

Wat I need ni we kunipa jibu in general kutokana na kile ulichoamini kupitia io ki2 ulioisoma..

Is HIV/AIDs real or not real?

☝👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆
Click to expand...
 
retroviridae said:
Deception dix issue is real "" very real""" na ipo within our communities ...
Izo articles ulizosoma zickudanganye ukaja ingia chaka,,

maybe those drug dealer wanaweka ili kumanipulate our mind ili 2jichanganye wao waendelee kuuza ARV zao...

xo take care broh...
Click to expand...

Angalau unajua kwamba kuna biashara ya ARVs inafanyika.

1.Kama ulichosema hapo kwenye nyekundu ni kweli.Je,kwa nini madaktari/maprofesa wanaopinga HIV/AIDS wanazuiwa kwenda kwenye international HIV/AIDS conferences kutoa lectures na articles zao haziruhusiwi kuwa published kwenye medical journals kama The Lancet nk?Wewe huoni kwamba haya maeneo niliyotaja ni rahisi sana kuwafikia watu wengi wanaomini HIV/AIDS ili kuwarubuni/manipulate?Kwa nini wanazuiwa kuingia maeneo hayo?

Pia kwa nini hao wagunduzi wa HIV wanakataa kufanya open debate na madaktari wanaopinga?Huoni kwamba hizi ndio nafasi nzuri kwao ku manipulate watu?

2.Kuna watu nimewaachisha ARVs na bado wanadunda muda mrefu sasa,pia wapo watu wengi ambao hawatumii ARVs na wamepimwa HIV+ muda mrefu sasa.Kama unasema kesi za HIV type 2 ndio chache zaidi,kwa nini huku kwetu ziwe nyingi sana kiasi hicho?Hata wewe ukiamua tu kufanya utafiti ili kujiongeza uwe doctor mzuri na mwelewa zaidi ya wenzako basi jaribu kufanya huo utafiti na utagundua tu kwamba kesi hizo ziko nyingi sana hapa kwetu.

Hebu msikilize huyu mgunduzi wa HIV hapa chini halafu toa mchango wako kuhusu anachosema:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSSpoFq7uhM
 
Nakapanya said:
nimekuwa confused kidogo,sasa wale wanaokufa kwa UKIMWi nini huwa kinawaua kama unasema hakuna UKIMWi?


Nini hupelekea wao kudhoofu mwili?
Click to expand...

1.Unaweza kuni quote ni wapi nimesema hakuna ukimwi?

2.Kwani wewe hujui kwamba kuna magonjwa mengi tu yanaweza kudhoofisha mwili?Kwa mfano,hujui kwamba TB inadhoofisha mwili?
 
Nilibanwa kidogo samahani, ila ningependa kupata ufafanuzi zaidi,kusema kuwa mpaka ungewaona ndipo maelezo ya kuwa ni nini kiliwasibu kimeniacha njia panda,hawa watu walikuwa kwenye circle moja na wote kikawatokea kimoja.(bado inanitia mashaka kuwa ilikuwa ni kitu kimoja kiliwasababishia hilo).Imekuwa ngumu mimi kuamini kuwa kulikuwa na mambo mengine yaliyosababisha hayo.

Na katika maelezo yako unakubali kwamba AIDS ilikuwepo muda mrefu tu kabla haijageuzwa kibiashara,je watu walitambuaje kuwa mtu anao?(dalili), na walithibitishaje ndio wenyewe?(vipimo), na matibabu yalikuwaje?(dawa), na kama ulikuwa unatambulikana uliitwaje kwa huku kwetu(Africa).Nimeuliza hivi ili tujue kama ulikuwa common hivyo kuwezesha watu kurudi nyuma kabla ya ARV's na kupata maarifa ya kweli.
 
Deception said:
Si kweli.Ukiwa na nia ya kujua ukweli utajua tu.Kuna mifano mingi ipo ya watu wenye HIV na hawatumii ARVs na bado CD4 zao ziko juu,tena ni wengi hata humu wapo watu wanatoa ushuhuda.

Kulingana na maelezo haya ni kuwa unasema HIV hawashushi CD4's kwenye mwili wa mtu,je hao HIV huwa wanauathiri mwili kwa namna gani? je ni friendly kwenye mwili wa mtu na hawashambulii chochote.
Click to expand...
 
Nashukuru kwa majibu mazuri,kama hutojali unaweza kuelezea kivipi kinga ya mwili inaweza kumaliza HIV kwenye mwili(mechanism).Kwa sababu kwa maelezo ya madaktari jinsi wanavyokielezea kirusi na hizo cells za mwili ni next to impossible kwa cells hizo kuvimaliza virusi.
Kuhusu ya kwamba nitamsikiliza mgunduzi au daktari wa bongo,naamini nitamsikiliza mwenye scientific facts zaidi kwa sabaabu ugunduzi huendelezwa kwa utafiti na mgunduzi hana hatimiliki ya knowledge,wengine huwa wanaendeleza alipoishia.
 
warumi said:
Natamanije niwaone hao wanaoku PM, khaa umbea huu utaniua, unakuta mijitu mingine inaponda humu baadae wanakuja PM kuomba msaada jinsi ya kuacha kutumia ARV, yani nacheka apa mpaka basi, pole sana kwa kazi nzito ya uko PM

Kama vipi waambie kwanza wapitie kwangu, niandike majina nijue takwimu ya watumiaji wa ARV halafu tuanze kuwahesabia siku mapemaa, hahaha hahaha lol, jamani natania tu ahahaha
Click to expand...

Ha haa punguza umbeya Warumi lol

Back to topic kumbe tunamalizwa kimyakimya bila kujua aise
 
makefra said:
Nashukuru kwa majibu mazuri,kama hutojali unaweza kuelezea kivipi kinga ya mwili inaweza kumaliza HIV kwenye mwili(mechanism).Kwa sababu kwa maelezo ya madaktari jinsi wanavyokielezea kirusi na hizo cells za mwili ni next to impossible kwa cells hizo kuvimaliza virusi.
Kuhusu ya kwamba nitamsikiliza mgunduzi au daktari wa bongo,naamini nitamsikiliza mwenye scientific facts zaidi kwa sabaabu ugunduzi huendelezwa kwa utafiti na mgunduzi hana hatimiliki ya knowledge,wengine huwa wanaendeleza alipoishia.
Click to expand...

Hao wagunduzi ndio wana hizo zinazoaminika kuwa ni scientific facts na ndio wanaosimamia jopo la watafiti kuendeleza utafiti zaidi kuhusu HIV/AIDS.
Hivyo basi,hata kama daktari wa bongo ana scientific facts,lazima atakuwa amepata kutoka kwao,madaktari wa bongo hawana uwezo wa kufanya tafiti zaidi ya hao wagunduzi kwa kuwa hawana fund na maabara za kufanya hivyo.
 
'Valentina' said:
Ha haa punguza umbeya Warumi lol

Back to topic kumbe tunamalizwa kimyakimya bila kujua aise
Click to expand...

Ahaha lol

Hata mimi wala sikutilia maanani hii ishu ya deception, ila niliamua kuruhusu milango yangu ya fahamu kupokea na kuyatafakari kwa jicho la tatu,jicho pevu, ndipo nikaanza kugundua kitu,nikauliza maswali yangu yote yaliyokuwa yakinitatiza kuhusu ARV na UKIMWI, hakika nimejua mengi zaidi niliyokuwa siyajui, ukitaka kuelewa zaidi siku zote ni kusikiliza na kuuliza maswali pale unapotatizwa
 
Ina maana hata nchi zingine zilizoendelea, wapinzani wakubwa na washindani kama China,Russia na Iran ambao ninaamini wana biotechnology inayowawezesha kufanya tafiti hizi nao pia wamepumbazwa kama sisi,sababu suala la AIDS na ARV'S huko makwao ni kama huku Africa lilivyo.
Kuhusu utafiti ninaamini madaktari wetu uwezo wanao tatizo ni funds na miundombinu.
 
Kwenye moja ya maandiko yaliyoletwa kwenye post #660,Dr. Raxit Jariwalla, professor of virology,one of the world's leading researchers in the field of AIDS and nutrition. In the questions and answer session,

Aliulizwa what does the diagnosis “HIV-positive” mean?

Akajibu kuwa “HIV-positive” means that a person has antibodies to this virus – not necessarily the presence of an intact virus. The presence of antibodies to HIV only implies that the person at some earlier point was exposed to the virus.

Sasa hapa umenikumbusha tukio la muda kidogo,kuna mtu wangu wa karibu alipimwa akakutwa na maambukizi,alihuzunika,akasikitika na kupanick sana.Baada ya muda akaja mtu akamwambia kwa sababu alitumia madawa ya typhoid kwa muda mrefu ndio maana CD4 zake zikawa chini hivyo akaonekana ameathirika.Na ni kweli alikuwa anaugua typhoid mno alikuwa akiyameza madawa hayo kwa miaka kadhaa,alikuwa anapima typhoid na kubadilisha dozi tu miaka nenda miaka rudi,bandika bandua dozi za typhoid bila kupumzika.

Akashauriwa asitumie dozi nyingine yoyote ya typhoid,anywe maji mengi ya kutosha,afanye mazoezi mepesi na kula vizuri ili kupandisha hizo CD4.Baada ya kufata ushauri huo hata haukupita muda mrefu sana akapimwa typhoid akaambiwa imeisha na vipimo vya UKIMWI akaambiwa yuko NEGATIVE.Na ni mzima mpaka leo kapima mara kadhaa na kaambiwa yuko salama na ni mtu mzima tu kwa sasa yuko kwenye 50's.(

Sasa najiuliza hivyo vipimo vya hapa bongo vilikuwa vinapima "antibodies wa HIV" au vilikuwa vinapima CD4's? Maana mpaka leo bado niko kwenye mshangao,swali hili nimelielekeza kwa madaktari wetu waliomo humu,anayewajua awape habari walijibu.
 
makefra said:
Nilibanwa kidogo samahani, ila ningependa kupata ufafanuzi zaidi,kusema kuwa mpaka ungewaona ndipo maelezo ya kuwa ni nini kiliwasibu kimeniacha njia panda,hawa watu walikuwa kwenye circle moja na wote kikawatokea kimoja.(bado inanitia mashaka kuwa ilikuwa ni kitu kimoja kiliwasababishia hilo).Imekuwa ngumu mimi kuamini kuwa kulikuwa na mambo mengine yaliyosababisha hayo.

Na katika maelezo yako unakubali kwamba AIDS ilikuwepo muda mrefu tu kabla haijageuzwa kibiashara,je watu walitambuaje kuwa mtu anao?(dalili), na walithibitishaje ndio wenyewe?(vipimo), na matibabu yalikuwaje?(dawa), na kama ulikuwa unatambulikana uliitwaje kwa huku kwetu(Africa).Nimeuliza hivi ili tujue kama ulikuwa common hivyo kuwezesha watu kurudi nyuma kabla ya ARV's na kupata maarifa ya kweli.
Click to expand...

Wale walee...
 
Swali lingine aliulizwa,Does HIV cause AIDS?


Akajibu,HIV has been linked to AIDS but, but there is no scientific evidence that it is the sole cause of AIDS. It is an undisputed scientific fact that it takes on an average 9 to 10 years (!) from HIV infection to the manifestation of the symptoms of AIDS in those who develop it.

Ukisoma jibu lake katika sentensi ya kwanza,anasema kuwa HIV ipo linked(!) to AIDS akaendelea kusema kuwa hakuna scientific evidence kuprove kuwa it is the "sole"(it can lead to AIDS lakini kuna other causes pia).Lakini kulingana na maelezo yako ulikataa kabisa kuwa HIV hayuko linked kabisa to AIDS.

Anaendelea kusema kuwa inachukua miaka 9 mpaka 10 kutoka infection ya HIV(Hapa anakubali kuwa HIV inaweza kuwa infected,ningependa unieleze inakuwa infected kwa njia gani) mpaka mtu anapokuja kuonyesha dalili za AIDS.

 
makefra said:
Kwenye moja ya maandiko yaliyoletwa kwenye post #660,Dr. Raxit Jariwalla, professor of virology,one of the world's leading researchers in the field of AIDS and nutrition. In the questions and answer session,

Aliulizwa what does the diagnosis “HIV-positive” mean?

Akajibu kuwa “HIV-positive” means that a person has antibodies to this virus – not necessarily the presence of an intact virus. The presence of antibodies to HIV only implies that the person at some earlier point was exposed to the virus.

Sasa hapa umenikumbusha tukio la muda kidogo,kuna mtu wangu wa karibu alipimwa akakutwa na maambukizi,alihuzunika,akasikitika na kupanick sana.Baada ya muda akaja mtu akamwambia kwa sababu alitumia madawa ya typhoid kwa muda mrefu ndio maana CD4 zake zikawa chini hivyo akaonekana ameathirika.Na ni kweli alikuwa anaugua typhoid mno alikuwa akiyameza madawa hayo kwa miaka kadhaa,alikuwa anapima typhoid na kubadilisha dozi tu miaka nenda miaka rudi,bandika bandua dozi za typhoid bila kupumzika.

Akashauriwa asitumie dozi nyingine yoyote ya typhoid,anywe maji mengi ya kutosha,afanye mazoezi mepesi na kula vizuri ili kupandisha hizo CD4.Baada ya kufata ushauri huo hata haukupita muda mrefu sana akapimwa typhoid akaambiwa imeisha na vipimo vya UKIMWI akaambiwa yuko NEGATIVE.Na ni mzima mpaka leo kapima mara kadhaa na kaambiwa yuko salama na ni mtu mzima tu kwa sasa yuko kwenye 50's.(

Sasa najiuliza hivyo vipimo vya hapa bongo vilikuwa vinapima "antibodies wa HIV" au vilikuwa vinapima CD4's? Maana mpaka leo bado niko kwenye mshangao,swali hili nimelielekeza kwa madaktari wetu waliomo humu,anayewajua awape habari walijibu.
Click to expand...

Kama yale maswali yako ya mwanzoni kabisa ulipoingia kwenye uzi huu yangekuwa na details kama hizo hapo juu,wala isingekuwa vigumu kukujibu kwa hoja zenye mashiko.
Kumbe mifano unayo,unachotakiwa sasa ni kusoma sana yote niliyoandika halafu hiyo mifano yako pamoja na ya watu wengine utaitumia kama vielelezo/vithibitisho.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Our Community

Regional Communities

Back
Top Bottom
Menu
Forums
New posts
Log in
Register