First before I comment let me assure you I do not support impunity or systemic extermination of people. But I do not deny the important role the ICC is playing, but they always take too long to do what they have to do. And PS, if you have sources tell me under which legal jurisdiction do they set prosecution and full trial dates since there is a tug-of-war between the Judiciary and the ICC. I am sorry I do not see their prosecution working. Too much schemes involved on both sides. It took almost three years to hear charles's taylor s case without a verdict given and the judges say they need 4 months to finally pass the verdict. Why does it have to take months before declaring anyone guilty?
Also do not forget that the ICC is eargely searching for
political clout and they know which grounds to look it for (Africa), there have been many people who have committed war crimes, e.g Sudan president Bashir and currently we have not heard them utter Syrian presidents name Al assad.
If I am wrong why is this story appearing on the internet
CHARLES TAYLOR IS SET FREE BY ICC
MISTERSEED.COM...............MESSAGE BOARD: CHARLES TAYLOR IS SET FREE BY ICC
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/12/world/europe/12briefs-Netherlands.html?_r=1
Mzalendo452,
Kwanza kabisa I appreciate your stand against impunity and appreciating the role of the ICC.
That said, I'm not discussing the pros or cons of the ICC in this given thread. People can argue all
the way to Kingdom come and never rich a consensus on that matter...depending on whether you
are the aggressor or the aggrieved. So I will not be dragged onto that pit for a fight.
Secondly, why are you trying hard to label yourself as a propagandist?...Hio title ya
'Charles Taylor
is set free by ICC' umetoa wapi?..That would be the trending topic in the world immediately it happens! Kwa
sasa Charles Taylor still remains a 'guest' at the Hague with all his freedoms curtailed. That is what
I was alluding to when I challenged your 'toothless dog' assertion. Mswahili husema 'Asifuye mvua imemnyea.'
The article ends thus:
"....If he is found guilty, he will serve his sentence in a British jail. The three international judges
are expected to take months before delivering their verdict. "
Emphasis on the red part. Where is the freedom you are talking about?...ama ni uvivu wa kusoma? Sometimes
when you engage please up your discourse to show positive purpose. Like I told another member in this same
thread Bantugbro has sent a message..si kila mdahalo humu ndani ufanywe ligi. So for you to ask me why it takes
the judges 4 months to declare a verdict begs me to pass. At your level as blogger you should know the answer.
If not, then google is a very good friend to many.
Finally, I would advise that you look at the inner workings of the ICC and how cases end up there. Si eti ICC
wenyewe wanaenda kutafuta kesi zao. Take Kenya's example and Waki's trigger mechanism after giving Kibaki
the envelope and the chants of the laughable yet comical Kenyan Parliamenterians shouting "Dont be vague, Go
to Hague"...That's how the great Jamhuri got there despite the Ocampo suspects running around in 'prayer rallies'
telling the gullible masses that the Prime Minister is colluding with Ocampo to prosecute them. Wanadhani ICC ni
mahakama ya Kibera ambayo wamezoea ku-manipulate?...Now go and find out how Bashir can end up there!
Kibaki better navigate this ship with the seriousness that it deserves otherwise the fallout will not be pretty!
I rest my case.