Kuongezeka kwa ukubwa wa jeshi hakutaongeza mafanikio katika vita ya Ukraine

[Gama]

Waziri wa ulinzi wa UK amesema kuwa mmpango wa Rusia wa kuongeza idadi ya wanajeshi ikijumuisha kuwabembelea wafungwa kuingia vitani hakutarajiwi kuongeza mafanikio katika mzozoz wake na Ukraine. Hii ni kutokana na kuwa Rusia imekuwa ikipoteza wanajeshi kwa wingi.

Kwasasa Rusia anataka kuongeza idadi ya jeshi kufiki miliomi 1.15 ikiwa ni ongezeko la takribani wanajeshi 137,000 Kwasasa, vijana weenye umri kati ya miaka 18 hadi 27 wanalazimika kuorodheshwa katika jeshi

FUATILIAA HAPA

Ukraine war: Russian recruitment drive unlikely to have impact - UK​

• • Published
    18 hours ago

Share
Related Topics

• Russia-Ukraine war

IMAGE SOURCE,EPA
Russia's plan to expand its armed forces is unlikely to have an impact on the Ukraine war, the UK's Ministry of Defence has said.

Vladimir Putin recently signed a decree to increase the Russian armed forces' military personnel to more than 1.15m - a potential increase of 137,000.

But the MoD said the boost was unlikely to increase Russia's combat power - partly because of ongoing losses.
President Putin's decree came amid a military recruitment drive.
There have been reports that recruiters have even been visiting prisons, promising inmates freedom and money.
Currently, Russia has a limit of just over a million military personnel, plus almost 900,000 civilian staff.

In one of its regular updates on the war, the UK ministry said it was not clear if the planned increase would be achieved by recruiting more volunteers - or by increasing conscription.
But any increase was unlikely to have an impact in Ukraine given that:

• Russia has lost tens of thousands of troops,
• Very few new contract (i.e. non-conscript) servicemen are being recruited
• Conscripts are not technically obliged to serve outside Russian territory, the MoD said.

Western officials say some 70-80,000 troops have been killed or wounded since Russia invaded Ukraine six months ago.
Russia planned a short, decisive campaign when it invaded Ukraine in February, but Ukrainian resistance has stalled its progress, and in recent weeks front lines have hardly moved.
Currently, Russian men aged 18 to 27 are subject to conscription, although many are able to avoid or reduce their service - usually one year - through medical exemptions or by enrolling in higher education.

Meanwhile, Ukraine has accused Russian troops of shelling the grounds of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant again over the past 24 hours. But Moscow in turn says Ukrainian forces have been shelling the plant.

The head of the plant's Ukrainian operator, Petro Kotin of Enerhoatom, has warned that radiation could be released locally if missiles hit the spent fuel stored beside the reactors.
"As a result of periodic shelling, the infrastructure of the station has been damaged, there are risks of hydrogen leakage and sputtering of radioactive substances, and the fire hazard is high," Enerhoatom said on Telegram.
Local officials have also reported that Russian artillery is firing at Ukrainian towns across the Dnipro river from the plant.

Also on Sunday, the Ukrainian army shelled a factory in the Russian-occupied town of Nova Kakhovka in Kherson region. Serhiy Khlan, a senior Ukrainian official in the region, said Russian troops were using it as a military base.
The BBC is unable to independently verify the claims on either side.

 

[Aleyn]

Pengine tungetarajia ukraine ndo aongeze idad ya askar ila sasa imekuwa ni tofauti. Bado naamini vyombo vya usalama vya magharibi vinavyosema russia amepoteza zaidi ya askar 80,000.

Kama ni special operation, kwanini igharimu maisha ya askari wengi kiasi hiki? Au ndo ile kusema nchi za kijamaa hazijali uhai na maisha ya watu?

Tumeshaingia mwez wa 7 toka vita vianze, hakuna uelekeo wowote ule wa russia kushinda, hata 30% ya malengo haijafikiwa.

 

[Bukyanagandi]

Waingereza ndio walivyo mazaba zabina tu, bado wana kasumba ya ukoloni wana kufikiri they still matter a lot kwenye masuala ya Dunia - ulaghai mtupu, kila siku wanatuletea up dates kuhusu mwenendo mzima wa vita nchini Ukraine kujifanya wanajua vizuri kinacho endelea kwenye frontline as if wao ndio war planners - na mara nyingi utabiri wao unakuwa ZERO kabisa.

Kujitia ujuwaji mwingiii na kuchochea vita nchini Ukraine ili viendelee indefinitely waweze kuuza Silaha zao na za Kimerikani - kama wanajiona ni majasiri na watu wenye mbinu nyingi za kivita, mbona mwaka juzi walitimua mbio kuondoka Afghanistani/Kabul unceremonously - na hili ndilo litakuja kujirudia tena huko Ukraine wanajeshi wa Uingereza wanao vaa nguo za kijeshi za Ukraine na kujifanya Waukraine watavurumishwa na jeshi la Putin mpaka wajute kujiingiza kwenye migogoro/vita ambavyo haviwahusu.

 

[Yamungu Athumani]

Anaongea Tu Siapeleke Pua

 

[kp kipanya44]

Dikiteta Putin anapelekewa moto tu...,Bora tu angekubali aibu na kuondoa vikosi vyake nchini Ukraine
Hakuna binadamu aliyekamilika,ata Putin ni binadamu tu, na mtu mzima akivuliwa nguo uchutama,
Asiogope kuonekana kakosea,ni Bora kukubali aibu kuliko kuendelea kuwaangamiza watoto wa " mother Russia"

 

[MT255]

Waingereza ndio walivyo mazaba zabina tu, bado wana kasumba ya ukoloni wana kufikiri they still matter a lot kwenye masuala ya Dunia - ulaghai mtupu, kila siku wanatuletea up dates kuhusu mwenendo mzima wa vita nchini Ukraine kujifanya wanajua vizuri kinacho endelea kwenye frontline as if wao ndio war planners - na mara nyingi utabiri wao unakuwa ZERO kabisa.

Kujitia ujuwaji mwingiii na kuchochea vita nchini Ukraine ili viendelee indefinitely waweze kuuza Silaha zao na za Kimerikani - kama wanajiona ni majasiri na watu wenye mbinu nyingi za kivita, mbona mwaka juzi walitimua mbio kuondoka Afghanistani/Kabul unceremonously - na hili ndilo litakuja kujirudia tena huko Ukraine wanajeshi wa Uingereza wanao vaa nguo za kijeshi za Ukraine na kujifanya Waukraine watavurumishwa na jeshi la Putin mpaka wajute kujiingiza kwenye migogoro/vita ambavyo haviwahusu.

Umepanic[emoji1787]

 

[Jitu 1]

Pengine tungetarajia ukraine ndo aongeze idad ya askar ila sasa imekuwa ni tofauti. Bado naamini vyombo vya usalama vya magharibi vinavyosema russia amepoteza zaidi ya askar 80,000.

Kama ni special operation, kwanini igharimu maisha ya askari wengi kiasi hiki? Au ndo ile kusema nchi za kijamaa hazijali uhai na maisha ya watu?

Tumeshaingia mwez wa 7 toka vita vianze, hakuna uelekeo wowote ule wa russia kushinda, hata 30% ya malengo haijafikiwa.

Tunashindwa kutumia hata akili za kwendea chooni..Ukraine hawezi kufikiria kuongeza idadi ya askari wake coz hana maeneo mapya anayoteka. Ila Russia ni lazima awe na idadi kubwa ya askari kwa ajili ya kudumisha usilinzi wa maeneo mapya anayoyakamata huku wale wazoefu wakiwa front kupambana. Huwezi teka eneo la adui na uendelee kulidhibiti huku ukiwa na idadi ndogo ya wanajeshi.

 

[Sikirimimimasikini]

Urusi yaua zaidi ya wanajeshi 1,200 wa Ukraine ktk operesheni ya Zelensky iliyofeli ya kurejesha miji

Majeshi ya Urusi yamewanywa wanajeshi wa Ukraine zaidi ya 1200 ktk masaa 24 yaliyopita katika majaribio ya Ukraine kutaka kurejesha miji iliyokombolewa na Urusi toka kwenye utawala wa waNazi mamboleo wa Ukraine. Kutokana na operation hiyo ya Ukraine iliyofeli, Zelensky kapoteza wanajeshi hao...

www.jamiiforums.com

 

[passioner255]

Dikiteta Putin anapelekewa moto tu...,Bora tu angekubali aibu na kuondoa vikosi vyake nchini Ukraine
Hakuna binadamu aliyekamilika,ata Putin ni binadamu tu, na mtu mzima akivuliwa nguo uchutama,
Asiogope kuonekana kakosea,ni Bora kukubali aibu kuliko kuendelea kuwaangamiza watoto wa " mother Russia"

Anapelekewa wapi huko maana Kherson waukraine wanauawa ovyoovyo.

 

[passioner255]

Waziri wa ulinzi wa UK amesema kuwa mmpango wa Rusia wa kuongeza idadi ya wanajeshi ikijumuisha kuwabembelea wafungwa kuingia vitani hakutarajiwi kuongeza mafanikio katika mzozoz wake na Ukraine. Hii ni kutokana na kuwa Rusia imekuwa ikipoteza wanajeshi kwa wingi.

Kwasasa Rusia anataka kuongeza idadi ya jeshi kufiki miliomi 1.15 ikiwa ni ongezeko la takribani wanajeshi 137,000 Kwasasa, vijana weenye umri kati ya miaka 18 hadi 27 wanalazimika kuorodheshwa katika jeshi

FUATILIAA HAPA

Ukraine war: Russian recruitment drive unlikely to have impact - UK​

• • Published
    18 hours ago

Share
Related Topics

• Russia-Ukraine war

IMAGE SOURCE,EPA
Russia's plan to expand its armed forces is unlikely to have an impact on the Ukraine war, the UK's Ministry of Defence has said.

Vladimir Putin recently signed a decree to increase the Russian armed forces' military personnel to more than 1.15m - a potential increase of 137,000.

But the MoD said the boost was unlikely to increase Russia's combat power - partly because of ongoing losses.
President Putin's decree came amid a military recruitment drive.
There have been reports that recruiters have even been visiting prisons, promising inmates freedom and money.
Currently, Russia has a limit of just over a million military personnel, plus almost 900,000 civilian staff.

In one of its regular updates on the war, the UK ministry said it was not clear if the planned increase would be achieved by recruiting more volunteers - or by increasing conscription.
But any increase was unlikely to have an impact in Ukraine given that:

• Russia has lost tens of thousands of troops,
• Very few new contract (i.e. non-conscript) servicemen are being recruited
• Conscripts are not technically obliged to serve outside Russian territory, the MoD said.

Western officials say some 70-80,000 troops have been killed or wounded since Russia invaded Ukraine six months ago.
Russia planned a short, decisive campaign when it invaded Ukraine in February, but Ukrainian resistance has stalled its progress, and in recent weeks front lines have hardly moved.
Currently, Russian men aged 18 to 27 are subject to conscription, although many are able to avoid or reduce their service - usually one year - through medical exemptions or by enrolling in higher education.

Meanwhile, Ukraine has accused Russian troops of shelling the grounds of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant again over the past 24 hours. But Moscow in turn says Ukrainian forces have been shelling the plant.

The head of the plant's Ukrainian operator, Petro Kotin of Enerhoatom, has warned that radiation could be released locally if missiles hit the spent fuel stored beside the reactors.
"As a result of periodic shelling, the infrastructure of the station has been damaged, there are risks of hydrogen leakage and sputtering of radioactive substances, and the fire hazard is high," Enerhoatom said on Telegram.
Local officials have also reported that Russian artillery is firing at Ukrainian towns across the Dnipro river from the plant.

Also on Sunday, the Ukrainian army shelled a factory in the Russian-occupied town of Nova Kakhovka in Kherson region. Serhiy Khlan, a senior Ukrainian official in the region, said Russian troops were using it as a military base.
The BBC is unable to independently verify the claims on either side.

Kumbe source yako ni waingereza

 

[4by94]

Waingereza ndio walivyo mazaba zabina tu, bado wana kasumba ya ukoloni wana kufikiri they still matter a lot kwenye masuala ya Dunia - ulaghai mtupu, kila siku wanatuletea up dates kuhusu mwenendo mzima wa vita nchini Ukraine kujifanya wanajua vizuri kinacho endelea kwenye frontline as if wao ndio war planners - na mara nyingi utabiri wao unakuwa ZERO kabisa.

Kujitia ujuwaji mwingiii na kuchochea vita nchini Ukraine ili viendelee indefinitely waweze kuuza Silaha zao na za Kimerikani - kama wanajiona ni majasiri na watu wenye mbinu nyingi za kivita, mbona mwaka juzi walitimua mbio kuondoka Afghanistani/Kabul unceremonously - na hili ndilo litakuja kujirudia tena huko Ukraine wanajeshi wa Uingereza wanao vaa nguo za kijeshi za Ukraine na kujifanya Waukraine watavurumishwa na jeshi la Putin mpaka wajute kujiingiza kwenye migogoro/vita ambavyo haviwahusu.

ukitoka hapa kaangalie bbc vzr kbs upate cha kuchangia kijiwen kesho

 

[4by94]

Tunashindwa kutumia hata akili za kwendea chooni..Ukraine hawezi kufikiria kuongeza idadi ya askari wake coz hana maeneo mapya anayoteka. Ila Russia ni lazima awe na idadi kubwa ya askari kwa ajili ya kudumisha usilinzi wa maeneo mapya anayoyakamata huku wale wazoefu wakiwa front kupambana. Huwezi teka eneo la adui na uendelee kulidhibiti huku ukiwa na idadi ndogo ya wanajeshi.

poor reasoning , Aliyevamiwa ndo angejiboresha kurudisha alichopoteza

 

[Gama]

Dikiteta Putin anapelekewa moto tu...,Bora tu angekubali aibu na kuondoa vikosi vyake nchini Ukraine
Hakuna binadamu aliyekamilika,ata Putin ni binadamu tu, na mtu mzima akivuliwa nguo uchutama,
Asiogope kuonekana kakosea,ni Bora kukubali aibu kuliko kuendelea kuwaangamiza watoto wa " mother Russia"

Kuna kadude kanaitwa single Army Tactical Missile System missile, haka kanaweza kurusha manati hadi mile 186 sawa na Km 300, haka, wamarekani wamegoma kukatoa kwa aukraine maana Ukraine akipewa ataharibu hadi Moscow. Haya ni munition maalum ambazo hurhwa na HIMARS. Hii inaashiria kuwa Putin hatashinda na akijichanganya USA wataoa hako kadude na huo ndo utakuwa mwsiho wa Urusi kwenye ardhi ya Ukrain. Uwepo wa HIMARS za ki Amerika unamaanisha kuwa Ukraine ina silaha bora kuliko silaha za PUTIN


TAZAMA HALI YA SASA

Ukraine: What are Himars missiles and are they changing the war?​

IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
Image caption,
A Himars launcher under tree cover in eastern Ukraine
The Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky says that Himars missiles are changing the course of the war against Russia.
The US-made system has been used to hit dozens of Russian targets such as command posts and ammunition depots.
It has also been used to target bridges, including those on the approach to Russian-occupied Kherson, which Ukraine is trying to reclaim.

What is Himars?​

Himars - the M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System - is a missile launcher mounted on a five-tonne truck which can fire six guided missiles in quick succession.

The missiles supplied to Ukraine have a range of up to 50 miles (80 km), which is over twice the range of the howitzer guns which the US has previously given to Ukraine.
Himars can also fire a single Army Tactical Missile System missile, which has a range of 186 miles (300 km). However, the US isn't supplying Ukraine with these.

The 50-mile range is roughly similar to that of Russian Smerch missiles, but Himars fires GPS-guided missiles which can be more accurately targeted.

How has Ukraine used Himars?​

Himars began being used in Ukraine at the end of June or the start of July, according to Phillips O'Brien, professor of strategic studies at St Andrews University.
He says the system was first deployed against fixed targets and command centres, rather than forces on the move:
"It was used up and down the front in eastern Ukraine, striking at ammunition depots some 30 miles behind the Russian lines."
However, he says, Ukraine may now be starting to use Himars against concentrations of Russian troops in barracks and command posts.
Ukraine claims a missile attack in Lysychansk, Luhansk killed up to 100 troops, and that a strike on the headquarters of the Wagner mercenary group in Popasna in Luhansk may have killed 100 of its members.

Both strikes are likely to have involved Himars, according to Prof O'Brien.

• Can we say how many people have died in Ukraine?
• What weapons are being supplied to Ukraine?

IMAGE SOURCE,EYEPRESS NEWS/REX/SHUTTERSTOCK
Image caption,
Ukrainian forces say they used Himars missiles to destroy a Russian ammunition depot at Nova Kakhovka in southern Ukraine in July.
The US is said to have supplied Ukraine with 16 Himars systems as part of its $9bn (£7,47bn) security assistance package.
The UK has also provided a missile-launch system called the M270, which is similar to Himars and fires the same missiles. Three of these have been delivered and three more are on their way.
In mid-July, Ukrainian forces started using Himars to cut off Russia's access to the city of Kherson in southern Ukraine, which it currently occupies.

• Drone pilots mark targets for new Ukraine offensive

Himars missiles damaged bridges across the Dnipro river which link the the city to Russian-annexed Crimea.
"The Russians have been pouring troops into Kherson to try and defend it," says Prof O'Brien.

"The Himars attacks have created a problem in resupplying them."

Image caption,
Himars missiles have closed the bridges from the Crimea which Russia relies on to resupply Kherson

Can Himars win the war for Ukraine?​

President Zelensky insists the system is vital to his country's efforts, writing on Facebook that "Himars and other precision weapons are turning the course of war in our favor".
By mid-August, Ukraine's forces had destroyed more than 100 high-value Russian targets with Himars, according to the US army.
"Himars helps cut supply lines, and that makes it a very important weapon," says Prof O'Brien.
"It has given the Ukrainian forces a new strategy - of degrading the Russian supplies until they cannot hold, of depleting Russian firepower, and of wearing its army down by attrition.
However, Dr Marina Miron, warfare expert at Kings College London, believes its impact may have been exaggerated.
"Himars is very accurate when it is used against fixed targets, when you have the exact co-ordinates," she says.
"But it is not so effective against moving targets such as troops, so it cannot push back an advance.
"I would say that Himars caught the Russians by surprise, but it doesn't change the balance of power."

Himars missiles can hit targets deep behind enemy lines
Ukrainian defence secretary Oleksii Reznikov says Ukraine needs 50 more Himars systems to stop Russian forces advancing, and 100 more to launch a successful counter-offensive.
However, according to Prof O'Brien, the supply of the missiles used by the system is more important.
"Having 16 or so Himars launchers will be fine," he says, "as long as there is a tonne of ammunition to go with them. But the missile manufacturers are under a lot of pressure to keep up supplies."

How is Russia fighting back?​

"Russia is now focusing on destroying Himars launchers and missiles while they are being delivered," says Dr Miron.
Its forces have repeatedly claimed to have destroyed a number of launchers and as many as 100 missiles, but have provided no proof.
"The Russians don't seem to be very good at combatting Himars by destroying them," says Prof O'Brien.
"Because they cannot fly aircraft safely over battle areas, they haven't been able to spot them from the air.
"And it is hard to hit back at a Himars once it has fired on you, because it can move almost immediately."

• Russia accuses US of direct role in Ukraine war
• Ukraine round-up: Russia's tech weakness and latest fighting

​