Leo Tanzania Yaamriwa Kuifuta Adhabu ya Kifo kwa Kunyongwa Mpaka Kufa!. Ni Aibu Tanzania Mpaka Ilazimishwe!. Rais Samia, Futilia Mbali Unyama Huu!

Leo Tanzania Yaamriwa Kuifuta Adhabu ya Kifo kwa Kunyongwa Mpaka Kufa!. Ni Aibu Tanzania Mpaka Ilazimishwe!. Rais Samia, Futilia Mbali Unyama Huu!

Pascal Mayalla

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Posts
53,857
Reaction score
121,995
Wanabodi

Tumepiga kelele sana humu kuhusu adhabu ya kifo kwa kunyongwa mpaka kufa kuwa barbaric!.

Hatimaye leo Tanzania tumeamriwa kuifuta adhabu hiyo ya kifo kwa mtu kunyongwa mpaka kufa!. Ni adhabu ya ukatili mno, iliyoletwa na wakoloni ili kuwa ogofya wananchi!. Ni aibu kwa Tanzania iliyostaarabika, kuendelea kunyonga watu, mpaka inalazimishwa kuifuta!. Tunamuomba Rais Samia, kuifutilia mbali adhabu ya kifo. Huu ni unyama wa hali ya juu!.

Taarifa rasmi

PRESS RELEASE – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Judgement by the African Court on Human and Peoples Rights

Ladislaus Chalula v United Republic of Tanzania

ARUSHA, TANZANIA – On 5 February 2025, the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the African Court) delivered its Judgement on Application No. 003 of 2018 (Ladislaus Chalula v United Republic of Tanzania). The case was filed on 2 March 2018 and an Application for interim measures was filed on 6 May 2019. Provisional measures were ordered on 17 May 2019. On 20 March 2021, the Applicant filed his Affidavit in support of the submissions on reparations.

The Applicant was represented by the Pan African Lawyers Union (PALU), with Advocate Donald Deya, as the Lead Counsel, assisted by Ms. Sarah Peeters.
PALU acknowledges and applauds the invaluable support of the Cornell Center on the Death Penalty Worldwide in this case, which contributed to achieving its successful outcome.

KEY FINDINGS IN THE JUDGEMENT:
The African Court made the following findings and relevant orders to the Respondent:

Finds that the Respondent (United Republic of Tanzania) violated the right to life guaranteed under Article 4 of the Charter in relation to the mandatory imposition of the death penalty and Orders the Respondent State to take all necessary measures, within one (1) year from the notification of this Judgment, to remove the mandatory imposition of the death penalty from its Penal Code.

Finds that the Respondent has violated the right to dignity protected under Article 5 of the Charter due to the method, used for carrying out the death penalty, namely execution by hanging, and Orders the Respondent State to take all necessary measures, within one (1) year from the notification of this Judgment, to remove hanging, as a method of enforcing the death penalty, from its Penal Code.

Orders the Respondent to take all necessary measures, through its internal processes and within one (1) year of the notification of this Judgment, for the rehearing of the case on the sentencing of the Applicant through a procedure that does not allow the mandatory imposition of the death sentence and upholds the full discretion of the judicial officer.

Orders the Respondent to publish this Judgment, within a period of three (3) months from the date of notification, on the websites of the Judiciary, and the Ministry for Constitutional and Legal Affairs, and ensure that the text of the Judgment is accessible for at least one (1) year after the date of publication.

Orders the Respondent to submit to it within six (6) months from the date of notification of this Judgment, a Report on the status of implementation of the decision set forth herein and thereafter, every six (6) months until the Court considers that there has been full implementation thereof.

BACKGROUND OF CASE:
The Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to death by hanging on 17 March 1995 by the High Court of Tanzania sitting in Tabora. On 10 June 1999, the Court of Appeal in Tabora, Tanzania's highest court, upheld the sentence. In his Application, the Applicant alleged that the trial before the High Court was marred by irregularities, and that both the High Court and the Court of Appeal erred in their assessment of prosecution and visual identification evidence. The alleged violations concern the rights protected in Articles 3(2), 4 and 7(1)(c) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the African Charter).

The Application is filed against the United Republic of Tanzania (the Respondent), which became a Party to the African Charter on 21 October 1986 and the Protocol to the African Charter on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the Protocol) on 7 February 2006. The Respondent further deposited, on 29 March 2010, the Declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol through which it accepted the jurisdiction of the Court to receive cases from individuals and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). This declaration was later withdrawn on 21 November 2019, but the African Court has previously held that this withdrawal has no effect on pending cases.

On 17 May 2019, ln view of the circumstances of this case which bear the risk that execution of the death sentence may impair the enjoyment of the rights by the African Charter, the Court unanimously ordered the Respondent to stay execution of the death sentence, subject to the decision on the main Application, and to report to the Court on the measures taken to implement it.

PALUS’ RESPONSE TO JUDGEMENT:
PALU continues to be an advocate for good governance and rule of law but most especially the defense and protection of all human and peoples’ rights for all Africans and every person resident in Africa. PALU is pleased with the final judgement delivered by the African Court and commits to assist the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania to comply with the judgement as its commitment as an African Union Member State.

Secondly, PALU implores the Tanzanian government to ensure effective and complete implementation of the orders of the Court, especially in taking all necessary measures to remove the mandatory imposition of the death penalty from its Penal Code, a request still pending implementation from the previous judgement of the Court in the landmark decision in Ally Rajabu and Others v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No 007 of 2015), delivered on 28 November 2019.

COMMENTS/STATEMENTS/REMARKS:
Adv. Donald Deya, PALU CEO: “This is a monumental Judgement for the Death Penalty Campaign in Africa and continues the evolution of progressive jurisprudence from the African Court on the issue of the death penalty in Africa. We, together with our partners in the Campaign, will continue to pursue this matter through the Request for an Advisory Opinion that we lodged in the Court in November 2024 to establish whether the death penalty is not compatible with the provisions of the African Charter.

We continue advocating that the imposition and implementation of the death penalty amounts to an arbitrary deprivation of life in violation of Article 4 and violates Article 5’s prohibition of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment or treatment.

We therefore hope and expect that the African Court will determine that AU Member States are obligated to abolish all laws and/or regulations permitting the imposition and implementation of the death penalty, in furtherance of their bold decision today.”

We also congratulate our esteemed colleagues and partners, the Centre for Human Rights, the Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa, the Legal and Human Rights Centre, and the Independent Expert on the Enjoyment of Human Rights by Persons with Albinism (Amicus), for their impactful collaboration as it significantly contributed to the advancement of the protection and enjoyment of human rights by People With Disabilities, as exemplified by today’s landmark judgment from the African Court.

NOTES TO EDITORS:
The Pan African Lawyers Union (PALU) is the premier continental membership forum of and for individual African lawyers and lawyers’ associations in Africa. It was founded in 2002 by African Bar leaders and eminent lawyers, to reflect the aspirations and concerns of the African people and to promote and defend their shared interests. Its membership comprises of the continent’s over five regional lawyers’ associations, over 54 national lawyers’ associations and over 1,000 individual lawyers spread across Africa and in the Diaspora.

ISSUED BY:
PAN AFRICAN LAWYERS UNION (PALU)
ARUSHA, TANZANIA
secretariat@lawyersofafrica.org
+255 685 078 794
www.lawyersofafrica.org
Facebook icon
X icon
Instagram icon
LinkedIn icon
YouTube icon
Copyright ©️ 2025 Pan African Lawyers Union, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website
Our mailing address is:
Pan African Lawyers Union
No. 3 Jandu Road, Corridor Area, P.O. Box 6065 Arusha, Tanzania
Arusha
Tanzania
Paskali.
 
Siungi Mkono na nitakuja na andiko la kuelezea sababu za kutounga mkono. Kuna Majitu Makatili Sana hapa Duniani ambayo ukisikia unyama yaliyotenda mpaka shetani mwenyewe anayaogopa. Sasa Majitu ya namna hiyo yakijua hakuna adhabu ya kifo yatafanya unyama mkubwa sana mpaka ardhi ibakie inabubujikwa machozi ya huzuni na kutoa laana

Ngoja siku nikipata muda na kutulia nitawaleteeni andiko
 
Unaita unyama kwa sababu hajauawa kikatili ndugu yako wa damu ukauona uchungu wake.

Kingine hiyo sheria haijawahi kutekelezwa Tanzania kwa miaka hii muhimu iachwe tu pending ijulikane ipo ili kidogo iwatishe watakaofikiria kuuwa nafsi za wenzao.
 
Wanabodi

Tumepiga kelele sana humu kuhusu adhabu ya kifo kwa kunyongwa mpaka kufa kuwa barbaric!.

Hatimaye leo Tanzania tumeamriwa kuifuta adhabu hiyo ya kifo kwa mtu kunyongwa mpaka kufa!. Ni adhabu ya ukatili mno, iliyoletwa na wakoloni ili kuwa ogofya wananchi!. Ni aibu kwa Tanzania iliyostaarabika, kuendelea kunyonga watu, mpaka inalazimishwa kuifuta!. Tunamuomba Rais Samia, kuifutilia mbali adhabu ya kifo. Huu ni unyama wa hali ya juu!.
Taarifa rasmi

PRESS RELEASE – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Judgement by the African Court on Human and Peoples Rights

Ladislaus Chalula v United Republic of Tanzania

ARUSHA, TANZANIA – On 5 February 2025, the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the African Court) delivered its Judgement on Application No. 003 of 2018 (Ladislaus Chalula v United Republic of Tanzania). The case was filed on 2 March 2018 and an Application for interim measures was filed on 6 May 2019. Provisional measures were ordered on 17 May 2019. On 20 March 2021, the Applicant filed his Affidavit in support of the submissions on reparations.

The Applicant was represented by the Pan African Lawyers Union (PALU), with Advocate Donald Deya, as the Lead Counsel, assisted by Ms. Sarah Peeters.
PALU acknowledges and applauds the invaluable support of the Cornell Center on the Death Penalty Worldwide in this case, which contributed to achieving its successful outcome.

KEY FINDINGS IN THE JUDGEMENT:
The African Court made the following findings and relevant orders to the Respondent:

Finds that the Respondent (United Republic of Tanzania) violated the right to life guaranteed under Article 4 of the Charter in relation to the mandatory imposition of the death penalty and Orders the Respondent State to take all necessary measures, within one (1) year from the notification of this Judgment, to remove the mandatory imposition of the death penalty from its Penal Code.

Finds that the Respondent has violated the right to dignity protected under Article 5 of the Charter due to the method, used for carrying out the death penalty, namely execution by hanging, and Orders the Respondent State to take all necessary measures, within one (1) year from the notification of this Judgment, to remove hanging, as a method of enforcing the death penalty, from its Penal Code.

Orders the Respondent to take all necessary measures, through its internal processes and within one (1) year of the notification of this Judgment, for the rehearing of the case on the sentencing of the Applicant through a procedure that does not allow the mandatory imposition of the death sentence and upholds the full discretion of the judicial officer.

Orders the Respondent to publish this Judgment, within a period of three (3) months from the date of notification, on the websites of the Judiciary, and the Ministry for Constitutional and Legal Affairs, and ensure that the text of the Judgment is accessible for at least one (1) year after the date of publication.

Orders the Respondent to submit to it within six (6) months from the date of notification of this Judgment, a Report on the status of implementation of the decision set forth herein and thereafter, every six (6) months until the Court considers that there has been full implementation thereof.

BACKGROUND OF CASE:
The Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to death by hanging on 17 March 1995 by the High Court of Tanzania sitting in Tabora. On 10 June 1999, the Court of Appeal in Tabora, Tanzania's highest court, upheld the sentence. In his Application, the Applicant alleged that the trial before the High Court was marred by irregularities, and that both the High Court and the Court of Appeal erred in their assessment of prosecution and visual identification evidence. The alleged violations concern the rights protected in Articles 3(2), 4 and 7(1)(c) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the African Charter).

The Application is filed against the United Republic of Tanzania (the Respondent), which became a Party to the African Charter on 21 October 1986 and the Protocol to the African Charter on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the Protocol) on 7 February 2006. The Respondent further deposited, on 29 March 2010, the Declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol through which it accepted the jurisdiction of the Court to receive cases from individuals and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). This declaration was later withdrawn on 21 November 2019, but the African Court has previously held that this withdrawal has no effect on pending cases.

On 17 May 2019, ln view of the circumstances of this case which bear the risk that execution of the death sentence may impair the enjoyment of the rights by the African Charter, the Court unanimously ordered the Respondent to stay execution of the death sentence, subject to the decision on the main Application, and to report to the Court on the measures taken to implement it.

PALUS’ RESPONSE TO JUDGEMENT:
PALU continues to be an advocate for good governance and rule of law but most especially the defense and protection of all human and peoples’ rights for all Africans and every person resident in Africa. PALU is pleased with the final judgement delivered by the African Court and commits to assist the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania to comply with the judgement as its commitment as an African Union Member State.

Secondly, PALU implores the Tanzanian government to ensure effective and complete implementation of the orders of the Court, especially in taking all necessary measures to remove the mandatory imposition of the death penalty from its Penal Code, a request still pending implementation from the previous judgement of the Court in the landmark decision in Ally Rajabu and Others v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No 007 of 2015), delivered on 28 November 2019.

COMMENTS/STATEMENTS/REMARKS:
Adv. Donald Deya, PALU CEO: “This is a monumental Judgement for the Death Penalty Campaign in Africa and continues the evolution of progressive jurisprudence from the African Court on the issue of the death penalty in Africa. We, together with our partners in the Campaign, will continue to pursue this matter through the Request for an Advisory Opinion that we lodged in the Court in November 2024 to establish whether the death penalty is not compatible with the provisions of the African Charter.

We continue advocating that the imposition and implementation of the death penalty amounts to an arbitrary deprivation of life in violation of Article 4 and violates Article 5’s prohibition of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment or treatment.

We therefore hope and expect that the African Court will determine that AU Member States are obligated to abolish all laws and/or regulations permitting the imposition and implementation of the death penalty, in furtherance of their bold decision today.”

We also congratulate our esteemed colleagues and partners, the Centre for Human Rights, the Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa, the Legal and Human Rights Centre, and the Independent Expert on the Enjoyment of Human Rights by Persons with Albinism (Amicus), for their impactful collaboration as it significantly contributed to the advancement of the protection and enjoyment of human rights by People With Disabilities, as exemplified by today’s landmark judgment from the African Court.

NOTES TO EDITORS:
The Pan African Lawyers Union (PALU) is the premier continental membership forum of and for individual African lawyers and lawyers’ associations in Africa. It was founded in 2002 by African Bar leaders and eminent lawyers, to reflect the aspirations and concerns of the African people and to promote and defend their shared interests. Its membership comprises of the continent’s over five regional lawyers’ associations, over 54 national lawyers’ associations and over 1,000 individual lawyers spread across Africa and in the Diaspora.

ISSUED BY:
PAN AFRICAN LAWYERS UNION (PALU)
ARUSHA, TANZANIA
secretariat@lawyersofafrica.org
+255 685 078 794
www.lawyersofafrica.org
Facebook icon
X icon
Instagram icon
LinkedIn icon
YouTube icon
Copyright ©️ 2025 Pan African Lawyers Union, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website
Our mailing address is:
Pan African Lawyers Union
No. 3 Jandu Road, Corridor Area, P.O. Box 6065 Arusha, Tanzania
Arusha
Tanzania
Paskali.
Hatujafika huko,kuna majitu makatili sana yanastahili hata kupigwa risasi hadharani hachilia mbali kunyongwa...Viongozi wa dini waongeze kasi kushape watu ktk maadili mema,kwa sasa hacha adhabu iwepo tu!ndo maana hata Museveni aliapa kutokuifuta
 
Judgement from useless and toothless court..

Hiyo mahakama uchwara ilishaamua kesi nyingi sana dhidi ya Tanzania na hatukutekeleza na hakuna kitu wanaweza fanya...

Again, Issue ya misaada na string twisting za wenye nguvu zinaelekea Mwisho kwa michezo anayofanya Trump.... nchi nyingine zinaanza kuona liwalo na liwe.... sisi sio exceptional...

Shukrani kwa taarifa mkuu.
 
Unaita unyama kwa sababu hajauawa kikatili ndugu yako wa damu ukauona uchungu wake.

Kingine hiyo sheria haijawahi kutekelezwa Tanzania kwa miaka hii muhimu iachwe tu pending ijulikane ipo ili kidogo iwatishe watakaofikiria kuuwa nafsi za wenzao.
Naona hajawahi kupatwa na majanga au kushuhudia ukatili uliofanywa na watu wenye roho mbaya kumpita shetani. Wewe muache ashangilie tu
 
Judgement from useless and toothless court..

Hiyo mahakama uchwara ilishaamua kesi nyingi sana dhidi ya Tanzania na hatukutekeleza na hakuna kitu wanaweza fanya...

Again, Issue ya misaada na string twisting za wenye nguvu zinaelekea Mwisho kwa michezo anayofanya Trump.... nchi nyingine zinaanza kuona liwalo na liwe.... sisi sio exceptional...

Shukrani kwa taarifa mkuu.
Nakumbuka tulijitoa ktk mahakama hii kipindi Cha JPM, tulirudi lini?
 
kuna watu ni katili mno humu ulimwenguni, tena kwanini wasingeweka hiyo adhabu iwe public..?
tungekuwa tuna uwanja maalumu wa kwenda kushuhudia matukio kama hayo yakiwa yanatekelezwa..!
 
Unaita unyama kwa sababu hajauawa kikatili ndugu yako wa damu ukauona uchungu wake.

Kingine hiyo sheria haijawahi kutekelezwa Tanzania kwa miaka hii muhimu iachwe tu pending ijulikane ipo ili kidogo iwatishe watakaofikiria kuuwa nafsi za wenzao.
Hii adhabu inatekelezwa vizuri tu
Kuna watu wameajiriwa na wananyonga kama kawaida
Waulize waliokata Magereza makubwa
Sio kila kitu utaambiwa wazi
 
Wanabodi

Tumepiga kelele sana humu kuhusu adhabu ya kifo kwa kunyongwa mpaka kufa kuwa barbaric!.

Hatimaye leo Tanzania tumeamriwa kuifuta adhabu hiyo ya kifo kwa mtu kunyongwa mpaka kufa!. Ni adhabu ya ukatili mno, iliyoletwa na wakoloni ili kuwa ogofya wananchi!. Ni aibu kwa Tanzania iliyostaarabika, kuendelea kunyonga watu, mpaka inalazimishwa kuifuta!. Tunamuomba Rais Samia, kuifutilia mbali adhabu ya kifo. Huu ni unyama wa hali ya juu!.
Taarifa rasmi

PRESS RELEASE – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Judgement by the African Court on Human and Peoples Rights

Ladislaus Chalula v United Republic of Tanzania

ARUSHA, TANZANIA – On 5 February 2025, the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the African Court) delivered its Judgement on Application No. 003 of 2018 (Ladislaus Chalula v United Republic of Tanzania). The case was filed on 2 March 2018 and an Application for interim measures was filed on 6 May 2019. Provisional measures were ordered on 17 May 2019. On 20 March 2021, the Applicant filed his Affidavit in support of the submissions on reparations.

The Applicant was represented by the Pan African Lawyers Union (PALU), with Advocate Donald Deya, as the Lead Counsel, assisted by Ms. Sarah Peeters.
PALU acknowledges and applauds the invaluable support of the Cornell Center on the Death Penalty Worldwide in this case, which contributed to achieving its successful outcome.

KEY FINDINGS IN THE JUDGEMENT:
The African Court made the following findings and relevant orders to the Respondent:

Finds that the Respondent (United Republic of Tanzania) violated the right to life guaranteed under Article 4 of the Charter in relation to the mandatory imposition of the death penalty and Orders the Respondent State to take all necessary measures, within one (1) year from the notification of this Judgment, to remove the mandatory imposition of the death penalty from its Penal Code.

Finds that the Respondent has violated the right to dignity protected under Article 5 of the Charter due to the method, used for carrying out the death penalty, namely execution by hanging, and Orders the Respondent State to take all necessary measures, within one (1) year from the notification of this Judgment, to remove hanging, as a method of enforcing the death penalty, from its Penal Code.

Orders the Respondent to take all necessary measures, through its internal processes and within one (1) year of the notification of this Judgment, for the rehearing of the case on the sentencing of the Applicant through a procedure that does not allow the mandatory imposition of the death sentence and upholds the full discretion of the judicial officer.

Orders the Respondent to publish this Judgment, within a period of three (3) months from the date of notification, on the websites of the Judiciary, and the Ministry for Constitutional and Legal Affairs, and ensure that the text of the Judgment is accessible for at least one (1) year after the date of publication.

Orders the Respondent to submit to it within six (6) months from the date of notification of this Judgment, a Report on the status of implementation of the decision set forth herein and thereafter, every six (6) months until the Court considers that there has been full implementation thereof.

BACKGROUND OF CASE:
The Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to death by hanging on 17 March 1995 by the High Court of Tanzania sitting in Tabora. On 10 June 1999, the Court of Appeal in Tabora, Tanzania's highest court, upheld the sentence. In his Application, the Applicant alleged that the trial before the High Court was marred by irregularities, and that both the High Court and the Court of Appeal erred in their assessment of prosecution and visual identification evidence. The alleged violations concern the rights protected in Articles 3(2), 4 and 7(1)(c) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the African Charter).

The Application is filed against the United Republic of Tanzania (the Respondent), which became a Party to the African Charter on 21 October 1986 and the Protocol to the African Charter on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the Protocol) on 7 February 2006. The Respondent further deposited, on 29 March 2010, the Declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol through which it accepted the jurisdiction of the Court to receive cases from individuals and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). This declaration was later withdrawn on 21 November 2019, but the African Court has previously held that this withdrawal has no effect on pending cases.

On 17 May 2019, ln view of the circumstances of this case which bear the risk that execution of the death sentence may impair the enjoyment of the rights by the African Charter, the Court unanimously ordered the Respondent to stay execution of the death sentence, subject to the decision on the main Application, and to report to the Court on the measures taken to implement it.

PALUS’ RESPONSE TO JUDGEMENT:
PALU continues to be an advocate for good governance and rule of law but most especially the defense and protection of all human and peoples’ rights for all Africans and every person resident in Africa. PALU is pleased with the final judgement delivered by the African Court and commits to assist the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania to comply with the judgement as its commitment as an African Union Member State.

Secondly, PALU implores the Tanzanian government to ensure effective and complete implementation of the orders of the Court, especially in taking all necessary measures to remove the mandatory imposition of the death penalty from its Penal Code, a request still pending implementation from the previous judgement of the Court in the landmark decision in Ally Rajabu and Others v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No 007 of 2015), delivered on 28 November 2019.

COMMENTS/STATEMENTS/REMARKS:
Adv. Donald Deya, PALU CEO: “This is a monumental Judgement for the Death Penalty Campaign in Africa and continues the evolution of progressive jurisprudence from the African Court on the issue of the death penalty in Africa. We, together with our partners in the Campaign, will continue to pursue this matter through the Request for an Advisory Opinion that we lodged in the Court in November 2024 to establish whether the death penalty is not compatible with the provisions of the African Charter.

We continue advocating that the imposition and implementation of the death penalty amounts to an arbitrary deprivation of life in violation of Article 4 and violates Article 5’s prohibition of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment or treatment.

We therefore hope and expect that the African Court will determine that AU Member States are obligated to abolish all laws and/or regulations permitting the imposition and implementation of the death penalty, in furtherance of their bold decision today.”

We also congratulate our esteemed colleagues and partners, the Centre for Human Rights, the Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa, the Legal and Human Rights Centre, and the Independent Expert on the Enjoyment of Human Rights by Persons with Albinism (Amicus), for their impactful collaboration as it significantly contributed to the advancement of the protection and enjoyment of human rights by People With Disabilities, as exemplified by today’s landmark judgment from the African Court.

NOTES TO EDITORS:
The Pan African Lawyers Union (PALU) is the premier continental membership forum of and for individual African lawyers and lawyers’ associations in Africa. It was founded in 2002 by African Bar leaders and eminent lawyers, to reflect the aspirations and concerns of the African people and to promote and defend their shared interests. Its membership comprises of the continent’s over five regional lawyers’ associations, over 54 national lawyers’ associations and over 1,000 individual lawyers spread across Africa and in the Diaspora.

ISSUED BY:
PAN AFRICAN LAWYERS UNION (PALU)
ARUSHA, TANZANIA
secretariat@lawyersofafrica.org
+255 685 078 794
www.lawyersofafrica.org
Facebook icon
X icon
Instagram icon
LinkedIn icon
YouTube icon
Copyright ©️ 2025 Pan African Lawyers Union, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website
Our mailing address is:
Pan African Lawyers Union
No. 3 Jandu Road, Corridor Area, P.O. Box 6065 Arusha, Tanzania
Arusha
Tanzania
Paskali.
Pascal mtu wa hovyo sana. Subir mzazi wako auwawe kikatili alafu mtuhumiwa afungwe tu, alafu atoke umuone mtaani anadunda
 
Wanabodi

Tumepiga kelele sana humu kuhusu adhabu ya kifo kwa kunyongwa mpaka kufa kuwa barbaric!.

Hatimaye leo Tanzania tumeamriwa kuifuta adhabu hiyo ya kifo kwa mtu kunyongwa mpaka kufa!. Ni adhabu ya ukatili mno, iliyoletwa na wakoloni ili kuwa ogofya wananchi!. Ni aibu kwa Tanzania iliyostaarabika, kuendelea kunyonga watu, mpaka inalazimishwa kuifuta!. Tunamuomba Rais Samia, kuifutilia mbali adhabu ya kifo. Huu ni unyama wa hali ya juu!.
Taarifa rasmi

PRESS RELEASE – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Judgement by the African Court on Human and Peoples Rights

Ladislaus Chalula v United Republic of Tanzania

ARUSHA, TANZANIA – On 5 February 2025, the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the African Court) delivered its Judgement on Application No. 003 of 2018 (Ladislaus Chalula v United Republic of Tanzania). The case was filed on 2 March 2018 and an Application for interim measures was filed on 6 May 2019. Provisional measures were ordered on 17 May 2019. On 20 March 2021, the Applicant filed his Affidavit in support of the submissions on reparations.

The Applicant was represented by the Pan African Lawyers Union (PALU), with Advocate Donald Deya, as the Lead Counsel, assisted by Ms. Sarah Peeters.
PALU acknowledges and applauds the invaluable support of the Cornell Center on the Death Penalty Worldwide in this case, which contributed to achieving its successful outcome.

KEY FINDINGS IN THE JUDGEMENT:
The African Court made the following findings and relevant orders to the Respondent:

Finds that the Respondent (United Republic of Tanzania) violated the right to life guaranteed under Article 4 of the Charter in relation to the mandatory imposition of the death penalty and Orders the Respondent State to take all necessary measures, within one (1) year from the notification of this Judgment, to remove the mandatory imposition of the death penalty from its Penal Code.

Finds that the Respondent has violated the right to dignity protected under Article 5 of the Charter due to the method, used for carrying out the death penalty, namely execution by hanging, and Orders the Respondent State to take all necessary measures, within one (1) year from the notification of this Judgment, to remove hanging, as a method of enforcing the death penalty, from its Penal Code.

Orders the Respondent to take all necessary measures, through its internal processes and within one (1) year of the notification of this Judgment, for the rehearing of the case on the sentencing of the Applicant through a procedure that does not allow the mandatory imposition of the death sentence and upholds the full discretion of the judicial officer.

Orders the Respondent to publish this Judgment, within a period of three (3) months from the date of notification, on the websites of the Judiciary, and the Ministry for Constitutional and Legal Affairs, and ensure that the text of the Judgment is accessible for at least one (1) year after the date of publication.

Orders the Respondent to submit to it within six (6) months from the date of notification of this Judgment, a Report on the status of implementation of the decision set forth herein and thereafter, every six (6) months until the Court considers that there has been full implementation thereof.

BACKGROUND OF CASE:
The Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to death by hanging on 17 March 1995 by the High Court of Tanzania sitting in Tabora. On 10 June 1999, the Court of Appeal in Tabora, Tanzania's highest court, upheld the sentence. In his Application, the Applicant alleged that the trial before the High Court was marred by irregularities, and that both the High Court and the Court of Appeal erred in their assessment of prosecution and visual identification evidence. The alleged violations concern the rights protected in Articles 3(2), 4 and 7(1)(c) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the African Charter).

The Application is filed against the United Republic of Tanzania (the Respondent), which became a Party to the African Charter on 21 October 1986 and the Protocol to the African Charter on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the Protocol) on 7 February 2006. The Respondent further deposited, on 29 March 2010, the Declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol through which it accepted the jurisdiction of the Court to receive cases from individuals and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). This declaration was later withdrawn on 21 November 2019, but the African Court has previously held that this withdrawal has no effect on pending cases.

On 17 May 2019, ln view of the circumstances of this case which bear the risk that execution of the death sentence may impair the enjoyment of the rights by the African Charter, the Court unanimously ordered the Respondent to stay execution of the death sentence, subject to the decision on the main Application, and to report to the Court on the measures taken to implement it.

PALUS’ RESPONSE TO JUDGEMENT:
PALU continues to be an advocate for good governance and rule of law but most especially the defense and protection of all human and peoples’ rights for all Africans and every person resident in Africa. PALU is pleased with the final judgement delivered by the African Court and commits to assist the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania to comply with the judgement as its commitment as an African Union Member State.

Secondly, PALU implores the Tanzanian government to ensure effective and complete implementation of the orders of the Court, especially in taking all necessary measures to remove the mandatory imposition of the death penalty from its Penal Code, a request still pending implementation from the previous judgement of the Court in the landmark decision in Ally Rajabu and Others v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No 007 of 2015), delivered on 28 November 2019.

COMMENTS/STATEMENTS/REMARKS:
Adv. Donald Deya, PALU CEO: “This is a monumental Judgement for the Death Penalty Campaign in Africa and continues the evolution of progressive jurisprudence from the African Court on the issue of the death penalty in Africa. We, together with our partners in the Campaign, will continue to pursue this matter through the Request for an Advisory Opinion that we lodged in the Court in November 2024 to establish whether the death penalty is not compatible with the provisions of the African Charter.

We continue advocating that the imposition and implementation of the death penalty amounts to an arbitrary deprivation of life in violation of Article 4 and violates Article 5’s prohibition of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment or treatment.

We therefore hope and expect that the African Court will determine that AU Member States are obligated to abolish all laws and/or regulations permitting the imposition and implementation of the death penalty, in furtherance of their bold decision today.”

We also congratulate our esteemed colleagues and partners, the Centre for Human Rights, the Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa, the Legal and Human Rights Centre, and the Independent Expert on the Enjoyment of Human Rights by Persons with Albinism (Amicus), for their impactful collaboration as it significantly contributed to the advancement of the protection and enjoyment of human rights by People With Disabilities, as exemplified by today’s landmark judgment from the African Court.

NOTES TO EDITORS:
The Pan African Lawyers Union (PALU) is the premier continental membership forum of and for individual African lawyers and lawyers’ associations in Africa. It was founded in 2002 by African Bar leaders and eminent lawyers, to reflect the aspirations and concerns of the African people and to promote and defend their shared interests. Its membership comprises of the continent’s over five regional lawyers’ associations, over 54 national lawyers’ associations and over 1,000 individual lawyers spread across Africa and in the Diaspora.

ISSUED BY:
PAN AFRICAN LAWYERS UNION (PALU)
ARUSHA, TANZANIA
secretariat@lawyersofafrica.org
+255 685 078 794
www.lawyersofafrica.org
Facebook icon
X icon
Instagram icon
LinkedIn icon
YouTube icon
Copyright ©️ 2025 Pan African Lawyers Union, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website
Our mailing address is:
Pan African Lawyers Union
No. 3 Jandu Road, Corridor Area, P.O. Box 6065 Arusha, Tanzania
Arusha
Tanzania
Paskali.
Hivi kuna kukatili mkumwa zaidi wa ule wa kuiba mali za umma, na kisha kuwafanya watu kukosa huduma za msingi na hatimae kupoteza maisha
 
Usipo jipanga utapangwa Kuna Vitu Kama Nchi mkiwa Maskini lazima Mpangwe wanacho Amua wakubwa ndio Mfate ukibisha wana kata Mirija ya Misaada mnabaki Kulia lia Inabidi Nchi za Kiafrica Zibadilike kweli.
 
Wanabodi

Tumepiga kelele sana humu kuhusu adhabu ya kifo kwa kunyongwa mpaka kufa kuwa barbaric!.

Hatimaye leo Tanzania tumeamriwa kuifuta adhabu hiyo ya kifo kwa mtu kunyongwa mpaka kufa!. Ni adhabu ya ukatili mno, iliyoletwa na wakoloni ili kuwa ogofya wananchi!. Ni aibu kwa Tanzania iliyostaarabika, kuendelea kunyonga watu, mpaka inalazimishwa kuifuta!. Tunamuomba Rais Samia, kuifutilia mbali adhabu ya kifo. Huu ni unyama wa hali ya juu!.
Taarifa rasmi

PRESS RELEASE – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Judgement by the African Court on Human and Peoples Rights

Ladislaus Chalula v United Republic of Tanzania

ARUSHA, TANZANIA – On 5 February 2025, the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the African Court) delivered its Judgement on Application No. 003 of 2018 (Ladislaus Chalula v United Republic of Tanzania). The case was filed on 2 March 2018 and an Application for interim measures was filed on 6 May 2019. Provisional measures were ordered on 17 May 2019. On 20 March 2021, the Applicant filed his Affidavit in support of the submissions on reparations.

The Applicant was represented by the Pan African Lawyers Union (PALU), with Advocate Donald Deya, as the Lead Counsel, assisted by Ms. Sarah Peeters.
PALU acknowledges and applauds the invaluable support of the Cornell Center on the Death Penalty Worldwide in this case, which contributed to achieving its successful outcome.

KEY FINDINGS IN THE JUDGEMENT:
The African Court made the following findings and relevant orders to the Respondent:

Finds that the Respondent (United Republic of Tanzania) violated the right to life guaranteed under Article 4 of the Charter in relation to the mandatory imposition of the death penalty and Orders the Respondent State to take all necessary measures, within one (1) year from the notification of this Judgment, to remove the mandatory imposition of the death penalty from its Penal Code.

Finds that the Respondent has violated the right to dignity protected under Article 5 of the Charter due to the method, used for carrying out the death penalty, namely execution by hanging, and Orders the Respondent State to take all necessary measures, within one (1) year from the notification of this Judgment, to remove hanging, as a method of enforcing the death penalty, from its Penal Code.

Orders the Respondent to take all necessary measures, through its internal processes and within one (1) year of the notification of this Judgment, for the rehearing of the case on the sentencing of the Applicant through a procedure that does not allow the mandatory imposition of the death sentence and upholds the full discretion of the judicial officer.

Orders the Respondent to publish this Judgment, within a period of three (3) months from the date of notification, on the websites of the Judiciary, and the Ministry for Constitutional and Legal Affairs, and ensure that the text of the Judgment is accessible for at least one (1) year after the date of publication.

Orders the Respondent to submit to it within six (6) months from the date of notification of this Judgment, a Report on the status of implementation of the decision set forth herein and thereafter, every six (6) months until the Court considers that there has been full implementation thereof.

BACKGROUND OF CASE:
The Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to death by hanging on 17 March 1995 by the High Court of Tanzania sitting in Tabora. On 10 June 1999, the Court of Appeal in Tabora, Tanzania's highest court, upheld the sentence. In his Application, the Applicant alleged that the trial before the High Court was marred by irregularities, and that both the High Court and the Court of Appeal erred in their assessment of prosecution and visual identification evidence. The alleged violations concern the rights protected in Articles 3(2), 4 and 7(1)(c) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the African Charter).

The Application is filed against the United Republic of Tanzania (the Respondent), which became a Party to the African Charter on 21 October 1986 and the Protocol to the African Charter on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the Protocol) on 7 February 2006. The Respondent further deposited, on 29 March 2010, the Declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol through which it accepted the jurisdiction of the Court to receive cases from individuals and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). This declaration was later withdrawn on 21 November 2019, but the African Court has previously held that this withdrawal has no effect on pending cases.

On 17 May 2019, ln view of the circumstances of this case which bear the risk that execution of the death sentence may impair the enjoyment of the rights by the African Charter, the Court unanimously ordered the Respondent to stay execution of the death sentence, subject to the decision on the main Application, and to report to the Court on the measures taken to implement it.

PALUS’ RESPONSE TO JUDGEMENT:
PALU continues to be an advocate for good governance and rule of law but most especially the defense and protection of all human and peoples’ rights for all Africans and every person resident in Africa. PALU is pleased with the final judgement delivered by the African Court and commits to assist the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania to comply with the judgement as its commitment as an African Union Member State.

Secondly, PALU implores the Tanzanian government to ensure effective and complete implementation of the orders of the Court, especially in taking all necessary measures to remove the mandatory imposition of the death penalty from its Penal Code, a request still pending implementation from the previous judgement of the Court in the landmark decision in Ally Rajabu and Others v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No 007 of 2015), delivered on 28 November 2019.

COMMENTS/STATEMENTS/REMARKS:
Adv. Donald Deya, PALU CEO: “This is a monumental Judgement for the Death Penalty Campaign in Africa and continues the evolution of progressive jurisprudence from the African Court on the issue of the death penalty in Africa. We, together with our partners in the Campaign, will continue to pursue this matter through the Request for an Advisory Opinion that we lodged in the Court in November 2024 to establish whether the death penalty is not compatible with the provisions of the African Charter.

We continue advocating that the imposition and implementation of the death penalty amounts to an arbitrary deprivation of life in violation of Article 4 and violates Article 5’s prohibition of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment or treatment.

We therefore hope and expect that the African Court will determine that AU Member States are obligated to abolish all laws and/or regulations permitting the imposition and implementation of the death penalty, in furtherance of their bold decision today.”

We also congratulate our esteemed colleagues and partners, the Centre for Human Rights, the Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa, the Legal and Human Rights Centre, and the Independent Expert on the Enjoyment of Human Rights by Persons with Albinism (Amicus), for their impactful collaboration as it significantly contributed to the advancement of the protection and enjoyment of human rights by People With Disabilities, as exemplified by today’s landmark judgment from the African Court.

NOTES TO EDITORS:
The Pan African Lawyers Union (PALU) is the premier continental membership forum of and for individual African lawyers and lawyers’ associations in Africa. It was founded in 2002 by African Bar leaders and eminent lawyers, to reflect the aspirations and concerns of the African people and to promote and defend their shared interests. Its membership comprises of the continent’s over five regional lawyers’ associations, over 54 national lawyers’ associations and over 1,000 individual lawyers spread across Africa and in the Diaspora.

ISSUED BY:
PAN AFRICAN LAWYERS UNION (PALU)
ARUSHA, TANZANIA
secretariat@lawyersofafrica.org
+255 685 078 794
www.lawyersofafrica.org
Facebook icon
X icon
Instagram icon
LinkedIn icon
YouTube icon
Copyright ©️ 2025 Pan African Lawyers Union, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website
Our mailing address is:
Pan African Lawyers Union
No. 3 Jandu Road, Corridor Area, P.O. Box 6065 Arusha, Tanzania
Arusha
Tanzania
Paskali.
Siku akiuliwa shangazi yako uje hapa pia kusisitiza adhabu ya kifo ifutwe, hivi nyie mmerogwa au? Umesikia leo watoto wametekwa ?ebu just imagine wakiuliwa wale(Mungu apishilie mbali) kwamba watekaji na wauaji waonewe huruma wasinyongwe ama? Au wale wauaji wa albno?
 
Wanabodi

Tumepiga kelele sana humu kuhusu adhabu ya kifo kwa kunyongwa mpaka kufa kuwa barbaric!.

Hatimaye leo Tanzania tumeamriwa kuifuta adhabu hiyo ya kifo kwa mtu kunyongwa mpaka kufa!. Ni adhabu ya ukatili mno, iliyoletwa na wakoloni ili kuwa ogofya wananchi!. Ni aibu kwa Tanzania iliyostaarabika, kuendelea kunyonga watu, mpaka inalazimishwa kuifuta!. Tunamuomba Rais Samia, kuifutilia mbali adhabu ya kifo. Huu ni unyama wa hali ya juu!.
Taarifa rasmi

PRESS RELEASE – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Judgement by the African Court on Human and Peoples Rights

Ladislaus Chalula v United Republic of Tanzania

ARUSHA, TANZANIA – On 5 February 2025, the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the African Court) delivered its Judgement on Application No. 003 of 2018 (Ladislaus Chalula v United Republic of Tanzania). The case was filed on 2 March 2018 and an Application for interim measures was filed on 6 May 2019. Provisional measures were ordered on 17 May 2019. On 20 March 2021, the Applicant filed his Affidavit in support of the submissions on reparations.

The Applicant was represented by the Pan African Lawyers Union (PALU), with Advocate Donald Deya, as the Lead Counsel, assisted by Ms. Sarah Peeters.
PALU acknowledges and applauds the invaluable support of the Cornell Center on the Death Penalty Worldwide in this case, which contributed to achieving its successful outcome.

KEY FINDINGS IN THE JUDGEMENT:
The African Court made the following findings and relevant orders to the Respondent:

Finds that the Respondent (United Republic of Tanzania) violated the right to life guaranteed under Article 4 of the Charter in relation to the mandatory imposition of the death penalty and Orders the Respondent State to take all necessary measures, within one (1) year from the notification of this Judgment, to remove the mandatory imposition of the death penalty from its Penal Code.

Finds that the Respondent has violated the right to dignity protected under Article 5 of the Charter due to the method, used for carrying out the death penalty, namely execution by hanging, and Orders the Respondent State to take all necessary measures, within one (1) year from the notification of this Judgment, to remove hanging, as a method of enforcing the death penalty, from its Penal Code.

Orders the Respondent to take all necessary measures, through its internal processes and within one (1) year of the notification of this Judgment, for the rehearing of the case on the sentencing of the Applicant through a procedure that does not allow the mandatory imposition of the death sentence and upholds the full discretion of the judicial officer.

Orders the Respondent to publish this Judgment, within a period of three (3) months from the date of notification, on the websites of the Judiciary, and the Ministry for Constitutional and Legal Affairs, and ensure that the text of the Judgment is accessible for at least one (1) year after the date of publication.

Orders the Respondent to submit to it within six (6) months from the date of notification of this Judgment, a Report on the status of implementation of the decision set forth herein and thereafter, every six (6) months until the Court considers that there has been full implementation thereof.

BACKGROUND OF CASE:
The Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to death by hanging on 17 March 1995 by the High Court of Tanzania sitting in Tabora. On 10 June 1999, the Court of Appeal in Tabora, Tanzania's highest court, upheld the sentence. In his Application, the Applicant alleged that the trial before the High Court was marred by irregularities, and that both the High Court and the Court of Appeal erred in their assessment of prosecution and visual identification evidence. The alleged violations concern the rights protected in Articles 3(2), 4 and 7(1)(c) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the African Charter).

The Application is filed against the United Republic of Tanzania (the Respondent), which became a Party to the African Charter on 21 October 1986 and the Protocol to the African Charter on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the Protocol) on 7 February 2006. The Respondent further deposited, on 29 March 2010, the Declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol through which it accepted the jurisdiction of the Court to receive cases from individuals and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). This declaration was later withdrawn on 21 November 2019, but the African Court has previously held that this withdrawal has no effect on pending cases.

On 17 May 2019, ln view of the circumstances of this case which bear the risk that execution of the death sentence may impair the enjoyment of the rights by the African Charter, the Court unanimously ordered the Respondent to stay execution of the death sentence, subject to the decision on the main Application, and to report to the Court on the measures taken to implement it.

PALUS’ RESPONSE TO JUDGEMENT:
PALU continues to be an advocate for good governance and rule of law but most especially the defense and protection of all human and peoples’ rights for all Africans and every person resident in Africa. PALU is pleased with the final judgement delivered by the African Court and commits to assist the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania to comply with the judgement as its commitment as an African Union Member State.

Secondly, PALU implores the Tanzanian government to ensure effective and complete implementation of the orders of the Court, especially in taking all necessary measures to remove the mandatory imposition of the death penalty from its Penal Code, a request still pending implementation from the previous judgement of the Court in the landmark decision in Ally Rajabu and Others v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No 007 of 2015), delivered on 28 November 2019.

COMMENTS/STATEMENTS/REMARKS:
Adv. Donald Deya, PALU CEO: “This is a monumental Judgement for the Death Penalty Campaign in Africa and continues the evolution of progressive jurisprudence from the African Court on the issue of the death penalty in Africa. We, together with our partners in the Campaign, will continue to pursue this matter through the Request for an Advisory Opinion that we lodged in the Court in November 2024 to establish whether the death penalty is not compatible with the provisions of the African Charter.

We continue advocating that the imposition and implementation of the death penalty amounts to an arbitrary deprivation of life in violation of Article 4 and violates Article 5’s prohibition of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment or treatment.

We therefore hope and expect that the African Court will determine that AU Member States are obligated to abolish all laws and/or regulations permitting the imposition and implementation of the death penalty, in furtherance of their bold decision today.”

We also congratulate our esteemed colleagues and partners, the Centre for Human Rights, the Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa, the Legal and Human Rights Centre, and the Independent Expert on the Enjoyment of Human Rights by Persons with Albinism (Amicus), for their impactful collaboration as it significantly contributed to the advancement of the protection and enjoyment of human rights by People With Disabilities, as exemplified by today’s landmark judgment from the African Court.

NOTES TO EDITORS:
The Pan African Lawyers Union (PALU) is the premier continental membership forum of and for individual African lawyers and lawyers’ associations in Africa. It was founded in 2002 by African Bar leaders and eminent lawyers, to reflect the aspirations and concerns of the African people and to promote and defend their shared interests. Its membership comprises of the continent’s over five regional lawyers’ associations, over 54 national lawyers’ associations and over 1,000 individual lawyers spread across Africa and in the Diaspora.

ISSUED BY:
PAN AFRICAN LAWYERS UNION (PALU)
ARUSHA, TANZANIA
secretariat@lawyersofafrica.org
+255 685 078 794
www.lawyersofafrica.org
Facebook icon
X icon
Instagram icon
LinkedIn icon
YouTube icon
Copyright ©️ 2025 Pan African Lawyers Union, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website
Our mailing address is:
Pan African Lawyers Union
No. 3 Jandu Road, Corridor Area, P.O. Box 6065 Arusha, Tanzania
Arusha
Tanzania
Paskali.
Akiuliwa ndugu yako uje na andiko refu kuliko ili mkuu,umesikia?!
 
Hii adhabu inatekelezwa vizuri tu
Kuna watu wameajiriwa na wananyonga kama kawaida
Waulize waliokata Magereza makubwa
Sio kila kitu utaambiwa wazi
Upo sahihi,watu wanapigwa kitanzi kama kawaida huko...tena wengi tu, tena hata mnyongaji aendi kusimama court kwa muda kama utaratibu unavotaka baada ya kunyonga mhalifu kama zamani.
 
Back
Top Bottom