Let me get this straight about the COVID-19 vaccine

Let me get this straight about the COVID-19 vaccine

Chanjo zote zina madhara mkuu.Hizi zinazoitwa chanjo za C-19 sio chanjo,ni Genome Altering Therapies,DNA Altering Therapies/Technologies, Microsoft Windows 666mRNA Operating System,Graphene Oxide Nanoparticle 5G Activatable Systems and more.

Mkuu vaccines especially C-19 jabs,ni simply too dangerous for human use.
Tatizo lako ukiulizwa huendi straight, unazunguka Sana na unajibu maswali ambayo hukuulizwa

Anyway, nimekuwa mdau wako Sana wa kusoma hizi mada zako kuhusu Chanjo ila bado hujawahi kunishawishi

Endelea kufanya unachoona ni sahihi Mkuu, tukipata muda kama hivi tunapita tunasoma then tunaendelea na mambo mengine
 
Tatizo lako ukiulizwa huendi straight, unazunguka Sana na unajibu maswali ambayo hukuulizwa

Anyway, nimekuwa mdau wako Sana wa kusoma hizi mada zako kuhusu Chanjo ila bado hujawahi kunishawishi

Endelea kufanya unachoona ni sahihi Mkuu, tukipata muda kama hivi tunapita tunasoma then tunaendelea na mambo mengine
Mkuu nimesema hakuna chanjo nzuri,that should be enough to tell you that chanjo yeyote,iwe kwangu au kwa mtoto wangu ni out.

Sijui ya homa ya ini,sijui Pepo Punda siwachanji watoto wangu.Chanjo nimezifanyia utafiti extensive najua ni dangerous.
 
Updates:
Huge pushback! 17,000 doctors stand up against C-19 Covid-19 mandates
.
 
Updates:

Please read this ⬇️very important article,it is a real eye opener.The contents of this article should make you realize that literally everything we have been told through the mainstream media is a lie,including everything concerning C-19.It is a pity indeed.
 
Updates:

A team of Bill-Gates linked research scientists have announced they are developing a needle-less vaccine that spreads itself like a virus, meaning people will “catch” the vaccine like they would a cold or flu, without the need for needles and injections.The research is being subsidised by high-profile funding organisations, including the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), which has longstanding financial ties to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

The drive to develope self-spreading vaccines is not without controversy. The DHSC paper notes: ‘Self-spreading vaccines are less lethal but not non-lethal: they can still kill.Some people will die who would otherwise have lived, though fewer people die overall,they argue.
The other issue is there is no consent (for vaccination) from the majority of people.But some ethics experts say there are parallels for ‘treating’ mass populations for public health issues without first getting individual consent.For example, the fluoridation of mains drinking water to prevent tooth decay already happens in some parts of the UK and the Government is considering extending it to all of England."Nobody is asked whether they give consent, even those who disagree with it,"says Professor Dominic Wilkinson, a medical ethics specialist at Oxford University. "Instead, we entrust elected officials to examine the likely health benefits and make decisions based on the evidence."

"I don’t think that there is anything intrinsically different when it comes to the idea of self-spreading vaccines," he says.

However, some scientists have serious misgivings about the risk that weakened viruses could mutate into a more potent form once they are free to spread in the population.

Dr Filippa Lentzos, a senior lecturer in science and international security at King’s College London, warns of a danger that the science behind self-spreading vaccines could be hijacked to make biological weapons.

‘Such a self-spreading weapon may prove uncontrollable and irreversible,’ she says.

And Professor Jim Bull, an infectious diseases expert at Idaho University who monitors developments in transmissible vaccines, told Good Health: ‘The big hurdle right now is knowing whether we can make them.’

The Department of Health and Social Care told Good Health that no trial for a self-spreading vaccine ‘would take place without undergoing stringent regulatory and ethics approval’.

.......................................
Link:Bill Gates-Linked Lab Developing Vaccine That Spreads Like a Virus To Vaccinate Anti-Vaxxers
This is absurd
 
Tatizo lako ukiulizwa huendi straight, unazunguka Sana na unajibu maswali ambayo hukuulizwa

Anyway, nimekuwa mdau wako Sana wa kusoma hizi mada zako kuhusu Chanjo ila bado hujawahi kunishawishi

Endelea kufanya unachoona ni sahihi Mkuu, tukipata muda kama hivi tunapita tunasoma then tunaendelea na mambo mengine
Kuhusu chanjo za uviko zinatengezekwa kwa teknolojia mpya (nanotechonology) ambayo ilikuwa inafanyiwa majaribio ya kutibu saratani. Kuibuka kwa uviko kukabadili mwelekeo wa matumizi ya hiyo teknolojia kutengeneza chanjo ya uviko.

Wakati chanjo za awali kirusi kilipunguzwa nguvu na kuingizwa mwilini ili mwili utengeneze kinga. Nanotechnology inatumika kuuadaa mwili, kupitia mNRA, kutengeneza kirusi bandia ili mwili huo huo utengeneza kinga. Matokeo yake mwili unapoteza uwezo wake wa kutengeneza kinga asilia.

Pata maelezo zaidi ya nanotechnology
 
Needle-less vaccine is against the essence humanity
So you seriously believe there is humanity left in Bill Gates,Anthony Fauci,Klaus Schwab and other NWO cohorts.Unajidanganya Mwengeso,hao ni psycopaths 100% controlled by Satan.Nia yao ni kuua 7+ billion earth inhabitants wabakishe only 500 million,tena wakiwa kama Zombies tu,afadhali hata wangekuwa serfs or slaves.Tafuta taarifa Mwengeso,inaelekea uko very misinformed.

Fuata link ifuatayo,labda utapata picha of what is in store for you by 2030.

 
So you seriously believe there is humanity left in Bill Gates,Anthony Fauci,Klaus Schwab and other NWO cohorts.Unajidanganya Mwengeso,hao ni psycopaths 100% controlled by Satan.Nia yao ni kuua 7+ billion earth inhabitants wabakishe only 500 million,tena wakiwa kama Zombies tu,afadhali hata wangekuwa serfs or slaves.Tafuta taarifa Mwengeso,inaelekea uko very misinformed.

Fuata link ifuatayo,labda utapata picha of what is in store for you by 2030.

It's not I don't believe in their devilish intentions but thinking aloud why humble scientist are not reacting?
 
It's not I don't believe in their devilish intentions but thinking aloud why humble scientist are not reacting?
Wapo independent minded scientists lakini hawasikilizwi kabisa Mwengeso,fake scientists bought by money,ndio wanaosikilizwa.There are even fake Journals za kuhakikisha kwamba agenda za hawa watu zina-kuwa pushed forward.Hizi zina kuwa supported by the mainstream media,which is fully owned by the NWO and is all fake news.

See also how doctors are pushing forward there side of the story about C-19 but are not being listened to.
 

Updates:

mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Can Cause 1,291 Different Adverse Events


Share

Recently released Pfizer document shows mRNA COVID-19 vaccine can cause 1,291 different adverse events

by Planet Today

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently released a document proving that Pfizer’s Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) mRNA vaccine can cause nearly 1,300 adverse events.
The FDA was recently embroiled in a court case over how quickly it can release documents from its Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research regarding Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. The relevant documents contain valuable information about Pfizer’s trials and the safety and efficacy of the vaccine.
The agency wanted the data to be released very slowly over the next 75 years by releasing only 500 pages worth of documents every month. But U.S. District Judge Mark T. Pittman ordered the FDA to release 55,000 pages worth of documents each month starting March 1.
This would allow the public to have all of the FDA’s information regarding Pfizer’s vaccine within eight months. (Related: Leaked top-secret Pfizer document shows COVID-19 vaccine is FAR MORE DANGEROUS than the world knows.)
Among the documents the FDA was forced to release just days ago is a 38-page report titled “5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) Received Through 28-Feb-2021.”
This document, which was marked by Pfizer as “proprietary and confidential,” and warned of possible legal action if released without the Big Pharma company’s consent, goes into detail regarding how many people have experienced adverse events after taking the company’s experimental mRNA vaccine.
The document has an appendix that is nine pages long and lists 1,291 different adverse events associated with the company’s COVID-19 vaccine.
This extremely lengthy list has a whole host of different medical conditions that the Pfizer vaccine can cause, including acute kidney injury, neonatal death, deep vein thrombosis, epileptic psychosis, facial paralysis, liver injury, stillbirth, temporal lobe epilepsy, type 1 diabetes and vertebral artery thrombosis.

Vaccines must be recalled and Pfizer held accountable​

Mary Holland, president and general counsel for the health freedom and anti-vaccine mandate organization Children’s Health Defense, called the Pfizer document with the nearly 1,300 adverse events list a “bombshell.”
“These findings should put an immediate end to the Pfizer COVID vaccines,” she said. “The potential for serious harm is very clear, and those injured by the vaccines are prohibited from suing Pfizer for damages.
She added that this long list of adverse events makes it clear why both the FDA and Pfizer “wanted to keep this data under wraps for 75 years.”
Holland added that the rollout of Pfizer vaccines must be immediately halted before the mass vaccination of children under five years of age starts. The government has already purchased 50 million dollars of this experimental and deadly vaccine for children and infants in this age group, to be delivered by April 30.
She pointed out the risk of serious injury or death from COVID-19 to healthy children within this age group is practically zero and that evidence shows the vaccine is not effective when used in very young children.
“It would be criminal to expose infants and young children to this extremely risky product,” added Holland. “[Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System] data shows the catastrophic health impacts the vaccine is having on millions of people, yet Pfizer and other vaccine makers are raking in billions of dollars with no fear of being held accountable for injuries and deaths from their vaccines.”
Watch this clip from “The Highwire” as host Del Bigtree and co-host investigative journalist Jefferey Jaxen talk about
 
Updates:
A highly qualified Physician provides sworn testimony and presents scientific proof that COVID-19 and Covid Vaccines were created as Bioweapons
 

Terrifying Morbidity Increases Since COVID VAX Introduced; All Vax'd to be DEAD by 2025?​

WORLD NEWSDESK 05 APRIL 2022 HITS: 22075
Terrifying Morbidity Increases Since COVID VAX Introduced; All Vax'd to be DEAD by 2025?

"I happen to be in the morbidity business; I'm the CEO of a large insurance group... Based on what it is we are seeing, the rates right now are excess mortality of 84% and excess of every kind of disease at 1100%. We are expecting a 5000% or so increase in excess mortality for this year (2022). An enormous number. I don't think that it's by coincidence, by the way, that Moderna has now just received licensure of their emergency use authorization HIV vaccine. So they gave everybody AIDS, and here's your salvation, another vaccine." -- Attorney Todd Callender
The video below is Attorney Todd Callender, whose comments are shown above.


When he says "So they gave everybody AIDS . . . " he's talking about the mRNA injections given out under the guise of COVID-19!
Quick investigation of the Preliminary USA mortality data for 2021 from the CDC reveals:

Total deaths - 3,447,405
Expected deaths - 2,948,273
Excess deaths - 499,132

0% increase = 1X, 100% increase = 2X, 200% increase = 3X, etc. 5000% increase = 51X.

499,132 X 51 = 25,455,732 excess deaths. That is what Attorney Todd Callendar indicates the USA could see ! ! !

Add to that the 2.95 million expected deaths, and the result is:

28,405,732 total deaths for 2022.


At this rate all the injected will be gone by 2025, just as was forecasted by the population reduction charts posted on the Deagel web site for many years.

Deagel.com last original 2025 population forecast (before scrubbing it all) for Germany was 28 million. For the USA, the chart that was "scrubbed" is shown below:
ZWxfa25vdy5naWY.gif


About one third of Germanys population remain unvaxxed. Today's population is 83 million, so Deagel's report may be quite accurate.

So the DoD guy who ran the Deagel website † 2021 knew about this "plandemic" since 2015? CIA connections huh?

Deagle has always had the forecast at the year 2025. The numbers may have fluctuated but the date never did.
 

PFIZER DOCUMENT CONFIRMS: Stay Away from the Vaccinated.​

Share

The disturbing document reveals the following:
  1. If an unvaccinated man touches a vaccinated woman or inhales the air she exhales and then has sex with his wife, his wife may have an adverse event and must then avoid having children.
  2. If a woman who has never been vaccinated comes into contact with a woman who has been vaccinated, she may:
A: Have a miscarriage,
B: Abort spontaneously,
C. Poison a baby through her breast milk,
D: Have babies with cognitive problems (memory and concentration problems).
Anonymouswire.com reports: This is universal, and very bad. Here is a small part of the text:
8.3.5.3. Occupational exposure
“Occupational exposure occurs when a person has unplanned direct contact with a subject for a vaccine, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These individuals may include caregivers, relatives, and other people close to the subject.
When such exposures occur, the investigator must report this to Pfizer saftey within 24 hours of being notified, whether or not an associated secondary adverse event occurs. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event reporting form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT RELATE TO ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY”.
To make it clear: participants in vaccine studies become superspreaders of something, they don’t say what it is, but it causes secondary adverse events in people who have never had the ‘vaccine’ when exposed to people who have had the ‘vaccine’. have had.
THIS IS SO BAD that here, in this little bit of quoted text, it is warned that unvaccinated men exposed to a woman who has had the vaccine will pass what is in the vaccine to another woman.
Even the relatively small portion of the document presented below states that the vaccine causes spontaneous abortions and reproductive problems when unvaccinated individuals are exposed to vaccinated individuals and that breast milk from a vaccinated mother can be harmful to the infant. And if anyone doesn’t believe that, click the link above and wade through that huge and intentionally confusing document. It’s true folks, the vaccine is indeed the killer syringe.
Don’t let the vaccinated come near you, it’s official now.
Here’s a small portion of this huge document, straight from Pfizer:
Terms
Study Intervention – A Vaccine Subject.
AE – Adverse event in someone who has received the vaccine.
SAE: An adverse event in someone who has been exposed to someone who has received the vaccine.
EDP: Exposure during pregnancy.
8.3.5. Exposure to the study intervention under investigation during pregnancy or lactation and occupational exposures must be reported to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of becoming aware of the investigator.
8.3.5.1. Exposure during pregnancy – EDP is present if:
  • A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving a study intervention or after she has stopped taking it.
  • A male participant undergoing or having discontinued a study intervention is exposed to a female partner before or around the time of conception.
  • A woman is found to be pregnant while exposed or has been exposed to a research intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of exposure to the study environment during pregnancy:
  • A female relative or caregiver reports that she is pregnant after exposure to the study intervention through inhalation or skin contact.
* A male relative or caregiver exposed to the study intervention through inhalation or skin contact then exposes their female partner prior to or around the time of conception.

If this vaccination is not passed on to other people, why should contact between vaccinated and unvaccinated be a noteworthy event? If this vaccination is not transmitted, WHY should a man who has been around a vaccinated woman, even if he has not touched her or had sex, be concerned about getting another woman pregnant?
That’s not all, the following is detailed and much worse.
The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator becoming aware of it, regardless of whether an SAE has occurred. The first information submitted must include the expected date of delivery (see below for information regarding the termination of pregnancy).
  • If EDP occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the investigator must report information to Pfizer Safety using the Vaccine SAE Report Form and the EDP Supplemental Form. Since the exposure information does not relate to the participant in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form will be kept on file at the investigator’s site. Follow-up is performed to obtain general information about the pregnancy and its outcome for all EDP reports with an unknown outcome. The investigator follows the pregnancy until completion (or until the pregnancy is terminated) and notifies Pfizer Safety of the outcome as a follow-up to the original EDP supplement form. In the case of live birth, the structural integrity of the neonate can be assessed at the time of birth. In the case of abortion, the reason(s) for the abortion should be specified and, if clinically possible, the structural integrity of the aborted fetus should be assessed by visual examination (unless the findings of the examination precede demonstrate a congenital anomaly to the procedure and the findings are reported). Abnormal pregnancy outcomes are considered SAEs. If the outcome of the pregnancy meets the criteria for an SAE (ie, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal death, neonatal death, or congenital malformation), the investigator should follow the procedures for reporting SAEs.
  • Spontaneous abortion, including miscarriage and missed abortion;
  • Neonatal deaths occurring within 1 month of birth, regardless of causality, should be reported as SAEs. In addition, infant mortality at 1 month should be reported as SAE when the investigator believes that infant death is or may be related to exposure to the study intervention. The client may request additional information about the PBT. Further follow-up of birth outcomes will be addressed on a case-by-case basis (eg follow-up of preterm infants to identify developmental delays). In the case of father exposure, the researcher will provide the participant with the Pregnant Partner Information Disclosure Form to give to his partner.
8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding – Exposure during breastfeeding occurs if:
  • A female participant was found to be breastfeeding during or after discontinuation of the study intervention.
  • A woman has been found to be breastfeeding while exposed or exposed to a research intervention (ie exposure to the environment). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female relative or caregiver reporting that she is breastfeeding after being exposed to the study intervention through inhalation or skin contact. The investigator must report exposure during lactation to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of becoming aware of it, whether or not an SAE has occurred. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. If exposure during breastfeeding occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the exposure information does not relate to the participant enrolled in the study and thus the information is not recorded on a CRF. However, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form will be kept in the investigator’s file. No report of exposure during breastfeeding is created when a Pfizer drug specifically approved for use in breastfeeding women (eg, vitamins) is administered in accordance with its approved use. However, if the infant develops an SAE associated with such a drug, the SAE will be reported along with the exposure during lactation. However, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form will be kept in the investigator’s file. No report of exposure during breastfeeding is created when a Pfizer drug specifically approved for use in breastfeeding women (eg, vitamins) is administered in accordance with its approved use. However, if the infant develops an SAE associated with such a drug, the SAE will be reported along with the exposure during lactation. However, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form will be kept in the investigator’s file. No report of exposure during breastfeeding is created when a Pfizer drug specifically approved for use in breastfeeding women (eg, vitamins) is administered in accordance with its approved use. However, if the infant develops an SAE associated with such a drug, the SAE will be reported along with the exposure during lactation.
Here is the clear part, which everyone can understand:
8.3.5.3. Occupational exposure – Occupational exposure occurs when a person comes into unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such individuals may include caregivers, relatives, or other individuals involved in the care of the study participant. The investigator must report occupational exposures to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s knowledge, regardless of whether an associated SAE occurs. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. Since the information does not relate to a participant participating in the study, the information is not recorded in a CRF;
Occupational exposure occurs when a person has unplanned direct contact with a vaccine subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may be caregivers, family members, and other people close to the subject.
When such exposures occur, the investigator must report this to Pfizer Saftey within 24 hours of being notified, whether or not an associated secondary adverse event occurs. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event reporting form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT RELATE TO ANY PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KINDED SEPARATELY FROM THE STUDY.
___
Pfizer Bombshell: ‘Stay Away from the Vaccinated’
 

Babies now in the sights of pharmaceutical predators

By Dr. Mª José Martínez Albarracín
No, the “pandemic” is not over, at least the implementation of “certain globalist objectives” that were proposed and unfortunately achieved, with the excuse of the coronavirus, is not over. Even if “covid cases” are no longer counted, even if the incidence is at limits that until a few days ago were considered so epidemic and worrying as to decree confinements and quarantines, even if the war in Ukraine has replaced covid in the television infodemic bombardment, the truth is that the RNA gene spawn misnamed covid vaccines have come to stay and to be inoculated universally and at all ages. The latest twist is the pharmaceutical companies’ request to the FDA for emergency authorisation to inoculate babies from six months to five years of age, the only age group that has so far been left out of the nightmare. But are you not already considering that the “pandemic” is not a health emergency? Why are you asking for an emergency authorisation to apply a vaccine that does not vaccinate an age group that does not suffer from severe covid? Answer for yourself, dear reader.
Moderna Pharmaceuticals, one of the companies that has developed and sells COVID-19 vaccines (their product is called “mRNA-1273”, and is mRNA-based) is the one applying to the FDA for emergency licensing of their product for children as young as six months of age. The company claims that it is up to 44% effective (in children under 2 years of age it does not even reach this value). Not only is this a mediocre efficacy, but this number only represents the relative risk reduction, not the absolute risk reduction, which is essential to understand the real benefit of using a drug, in this case a vaccine.
Scientific evidence from numerous published studies shows that the case fatality rate (CFR) of covid syndrome is low for many ages, and that it increases with increasing age, peaking in people over the age of 80 who have comorbidities. Below the age of 50, lethality is comparable to influenza lethality and below the age of 30 it is practically non-existent (affecting only some people who may have a dysregulated immune system) and this has been known since the beginning of the pandemic. Just recently a study by the “COVID-19 Forecasting team” (a multidisciplinary, multi-institutional team using mathematical and epidemiological models to understand the pandemic) was published in the Lancet. The study is entitled:
“Variation in COVID-19 infection-fatality rate by age, time and geography during the pre-vaccine stage: a systematic analysis” Variation in the COVID-19 infection–fatality ratio by age, time, and geography during the pre-vaccine era: a systematic analysis
Despite this, the fear that has been instilled in the mainstream media has turned covid into a dreaded killer for many people, but the reality does not confirm this perception. The scientific evidence continues to show that the syndrome associated with the infection, known as COVID-19, is primarily due to excessive and dysregulated immune responses, rather than the direct action of a pathogen.
The above publication demonstrates that the case fatality rate (CFR) associated with covid has been maintained over time. The authors estimated the age-specific CFR for each age and for all ages using (from the start of the pandemic to before the start of vaccination) antibody prevalence data. As well as COVID-19 mortality data for each age group and for each of the 190 countries and territories included in the study. The reason they only considered the pre-vaccine stage was to compare the impact of these products on the pattern of CFT. Interestingly, they found that in all countries and territories analysed, the average case fatality rate (CFR) decreased from 0.466% to 0.314% (between mid-April 2020 and 1 January 2021). This is exactly what evolutionary theory predicts for an epidemic in a population that has the ability to generate immune responses. This is why I have said on numerous occasions that, had these non-immunising drugs not been introduced, the “pandemic” would have ended on its own. Unfortunately, we have seen that gene inoculations have had a negative impact on CFT, especially among vaccinated people, and thus the epidemic has been artificially sustained.
The study authors found considerable variation in CCT by age, location and time, as can be seen in figures 1 and 2 of the study. Children under 7 years of age had the lowest case fatality: 0.0023% (this means that two children die per 100,000 sick children and those who die are children with previous pathology).
Moderna is going to request Emergency Authorisation from the FDA to vaccinate children from 6 months of age with its product, for which not a single study of genotoxicity (causing DNA damage), genomic integration (changing the DNA of the cells it enters), mutagenesis (causing mutations), carcinogenesis (causing cancer), etc., has been carried out, and for which only Moderna (which is conducting the study) has given its word on safety and has not made these data public.
It is no longer surprising that a company wants to sell and does everything possible, including manipulation and deception, to increase its profits. What we would expect, however, is that drug regulatory agencies would do their job without any conflict of interest, but recent history has shown that this is often not the case. In any case, even if Moderna asks for it, and even if the FDA, EMA or any other agency authorises these products in young children, we need to remember that it is the parents who make the decision to take their six-month-old baby for vaccination. I wish they would make that decision based on science and demand full and complete informed consent of what they are going to inoculate their children with, understanding the covid (TFC) fatality rate, understanding what efficacy means, understanding what they did in the clinical trial to ask for clearance and what they did not investigate, and understanding the terrible adverse effects of the inoculations that are slowly becoming known, before exposing their children, simply because that is what they were told.
red.CienciaySaludNatural.com added a new post
Riesgo relativo vs riesgo absoluto de la inyección, un fraude aún no bien comprendido
10 Razones para no vacunar contra K0 B1T a niños y adolescentes
Variation in the COVID-19 infection–fatality ratio by age, time, and geography during the pre-vaccine era: a systematic analysis

La inyección contra K0 B1T, modifica permanentemente el ADN de las células afectadas
La FDA y los CDC ocultan los eventos adversos de las inyecciones K0 B1T
10 Razones para no vacunar contra K0 B1T a niños y adolescentes
Se reportaron 65.615 muertes y 4.923.276 efectos adversos entre Europa y los EE.UU. por la inyección K0 B1T al 26-2-22
Moderna to ask FDA to authorize Covid-19 vaccine in children 6 months to 6 years
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04796896
 

UPDATES:

When you’re jabbed, 5G and smartphones will finish the job! (Video)​

 
The World Health Organization (WHO) has contracted German-based Deutsche Telekom subsidiary T-Systems to develop a global vaccine passport system,

The World Health Organization (WHO) has contracted German-based Deutsche Telekom subsidiary T-Systems to develop a global vaccine passport system, with plans to link every person on the planet to a QR code digital ID.

eMBzNWCssGxPROjbYaI9DWSkYO2mHeX9XyujAEMjM5NMPA4fHalJ9AkdijcFaahUk3iyiPEcA-th6nOeq1jTTsJmgLVgO6yP7PIw7bLIepIHIVtZbCiv8rxyeME6Xeny6fQHGuCn

(The Signal) Indeed, despite the minuscule threat posed by new variants and dubious-at-best vaccine efficacy, the WHO is adamant that a global QR code-based vaccine passport system is vital for all future health emergencies, not just COVID.

“COVID-19 affects everyone. Countries will therefore only emerge from the pandemic together. Vaccination certificates that are tamper-proof and digitally verifiable build trust. WHO is therefore supporting member states in building national and regional trust networks and verification technology,” says unit head of the WHO’s Department of Digital Health and Innovation Garrett Mehl.

“The WHO’s gateway service also serves as a bridge between regional systems. It can also be used as part of future vaccination campaigns and home-based records.”

It should be noted that besides the moral implications of implementing health-based restrictions in the wake of future pandemics — whether they be COVID, polio, or anything else — a global vaccine passport also brings up national security concerns, as the WHO and its backers would have access to these “home-based records.”

In terms of feasibility, as previously reported by Reuters, T-Systems has a lot of experience developing discriminatory health apps, having worked to create Germany’s Corona-Warn-App tracing and Europe’s vaccine passport.

“Corona has a grip on the world. Digitization keeps the world running. Digital vaccination certificates like the EU’s are key to this. We are pleased to be able to support the WHO in the fight against the pandemic,” said T-Systems CEO Adel Al-Saleh.

Moreover, as reported by The Counter Signal, the push for a global vaccine passport coincides with the WHO’s drafting of a global pandemic treaty, which would legally bind member states to the WHO’s International Health Regulations and allow the organization to dictate all future pandemic responses, utterly quashing national health sovereignty.

The WHO began drafting its treaty in December 2021 during a special session entitled “The World Together.”

The treaty is to be upheld by the WHO’s constitution, which under Article 19 “[provides] the World Health Assembly with the authority to adopt conventions or agreements on any matter within WHO’s competence.” [Emphasis added]

This authority was initially designed to pertain only to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control but is being expanded to include dictating Member States’ future pandemic responses.

Additionally, as pointed out by MP Leslyn Lewis, the treaty would also allow the WHO to determine what is a pandemic and when one is occurring, even over something non-viral like an obesity crisis. This would effectively give the organization the authority to take control of member states’ healthcare systems whenever they feel necessary.


Of even more concern, if this treaty is enshrined, the WHO would be in full control over what gets called a pandemic,” Lewis wrote in a statement. “They could dictate how our doctors can respond, which drugs can and can’t be used, or which vaccines are approved. We would end up with a one-size-fits-all approach for the entire world… A one-size-fits-all response to a health crisis doesn’t even work across Canada, let alone the entire globe.”

And it isn’t unfathomable that a “convention” the WHO could adopt under such a treaty would be their global vaccine passport, either. In fact, this may be quintessential to ensuring compliance with whatever regulations or restrictions they impose during a pandemic that they declare.
 
UPDATES:

Epidemic:German and Austrian Mayors under 60 are suddenly and unexpectedly dropping-dead.Could the deaths be related to the C-19?All were vaccinated.
 
Back
Top Bottom