Mwabukusi apigwa na kitu kizito!
Mwendo ule ule! kama wa Dyansobera!
Mwenye kujua kimombo asome mwenyewe
Kesi imetupiliwa mbali kwa vile eneo bishaniwe halikuwekwa bayana kuweza kulitambua ukubwa wake
MY POINT IS: Bila kificho, High court ni kituko , takataka tupu! NI SERVANT OF THE EXECUTIVE AND CCM
Rufaa ya Freeman Mbowe kuhusu kukamatwa isivyo halali Mwanza mwaka tarehe 21 Julai 2021 na kutofikishwa mahakamani ndani ya saa 48
Jopo la majaji wa Mahakama ya Rufani Tanzania lililojumuisha majaji 3 wa mahakama ya Rufani ambao ni Maige, J.A., Mwandambo, J.A., Khamis, J.A. katika kusikiliza kesi ya Freeman Mbowe dhidi ya DPP, IGP na Mwanasheria mkuu wa serikali
Mahakama ya Rufani Tanzania katika rufaa ya Freeman Mbowe kuhusu kukamatwa isivyo halali Mwanza mwaka tarehe 21 Julai 2021 na kutofikishwa mahakamani ndani ya saa 48 imetupwa, kwa kuwa mrufani alipata haki kulalamika mbele ya Mahakama Kuu kuhusu ukiukwaji wa haki ya kufikishwa mahakamani ndani ya saa 48. Na kuwa suala hili ni mtambuka linagusa sheria na katiba ya nchi....
Freeman Aikael Mbowe vs The Director of Public Prosecution & Others (Civil Appeal No. 382 of 2021) [2024] TZCA 836 (30 August 2024)
Kiini cha kesi
Mbowe pamoja na wenzake 11 kutoka chama cha Chadema walikamatwa na polisi usiku wa kuamkia Jumatano jijini Mwanza.
21 Julai 2021
Awali Mahakama kuu ya Tanzania imesikiliza kesi ya kikatiba iliowasilishwa na mwenyekiti wa chama kikuu cha upinzani nchini humo Chadema Freeman Mbowe, anadai ukiukwaji wa katiba na sheria wakati wa kukamatwa kwake huko mkoani Mwanza mwezi uliopita...
Na sasa Mahakama ya Juu Kabisa yaani Mahakama ya Rufani Tanzania:
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM
(CORAM: MWANDAMBO. J.A.. MAIGE, 3.A. And KHAMIS, J.A.^
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 382 OF 2021
FREEMAN AIKAEL MBOWE . ....................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION ...................... 1st RESPONDENT
THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ........................... 2nd RESPONDENT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ................................................ 3RD
RESPONDENT
(Appeal from the Ruling and Order of the High Court of Tanzania ,Main Registry at Dares Salaam)
(Mqetta, J.)
dated 23rd day of September, 2021 in
Misc. Civil Application No. 21 of 2021
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
20th & 30th August, 2024
MAIGE. 3.A.:
Article 13 (1) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania,
2017 ("the Constitution"), provides for equality before the law and
prohibits any form of discrimination. Under sub-article (3) thereof, such right and other civic rights set out in part III of the Constitution are justiciable. To ensure that such right is duly protected, sub-article (6)
requires the state authority to put in place procedures which are appropriate or that which observe the following principles
Page 1
might have already affected the appellant, would have not been dealt with by the criminal court. Come what may, in as long as what are alleged to have been committed or omitted are prohibited by statutory laws, they
would, if proved, amount to abuses of powers by the respective
government authorities to the extent that they are utra vires the law. Such an illegal conduct can effectively be addressed by way of ordinary judicial review whose primary purpose is to supervise the legislature and executive
branches where they exceed their statutory powers. This was theposition in the Attorney General v. Dickson Sanga (supra) where it was observed:
"7/7
his oral submissions, the Solicitor General contended that, a remedy of judicial review is available to the accused personf on alleged abuse o f authority by
the DPP. Apart from agreeing with the Solicitor Genera!'it is our firm view that the Constitution which is the
supreme law o f the land frowns on the abuse or misuse
o f procedures in dispensing crim inal justice.
Thus, in case o f any abuse by the DPP the safeguard and remedy is to seek judicial review before the High Court by
invoking the Law Reform (Fatal Accidents and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, [CAP 310 R.E. 2002] as correctly asserted by the Solicitor General."
Kiongozi huyu mkuu wa Chadema Freeman Mbowe alitiwa mbaroni huko jijini Mwanza usiku wa kuamkia tarehe 21 mwezi Julai, 2021. Chama chake cha CHADEMA, kiliwataka wafuasi wa chama hicho kuingia mtaani kumtafuta baada ya juhudi zake za kumtafuta kukwama na hawajui walipo, baada ya Mamlaka kutosema lolote kwa muda kuhusu kukamatwa kwa Freeman Mbowe.
Baadae Polisi walikuja kuthibitisha kumkamatwa na kwamba amesafirshwa kutoka Mwanza kwenda Dar es Salaam na kuunganishwa kwenye kesi ya ugaidi.
Taarifa ya Msemaji wa Polisi, David Misime ilisema kuwa Mbowe hakukamatwa kwa tuhuma za kupanga na kuandaa kongamano la Katiba mpya jijini Mwanza bali alifahamu tuhuma zinazomkabili.
Julai 26, 2021: Alifikishwa mahakamani
Freeman Mbowe alifikishwa katika Mahakama ya Hakimu Mkazi Kisutu kwa mara ya kwanza Julai 26, 2021 na kusomewa mashtaka mawili ikiwemo la ugaidi. Baada ya kusomewa maelezo Freeman Mbowe hakutakiwa kujibu chochote kwa kuwa Mahakama hiyo haina mamlaka, kesi ikahairishwa hadi Agosti 5, 2021 kusubiri nyaraka ili ihamishiwe Mahakama kuu.
Agosti 6, 2021 Alisomewa Mashitaka
Freeman Mbowe ambaye ni kiongozi wa zamani wa Kambi Rasmi ya Upinzani Bungeni (KUB) na wenzake watatu (makomandoo) walisomewa mashtaka sita yakiwemo ya kufadhili vitendo vya ugaidi na kukusanya pesa kwa kufanya vitendo hivyo.
Mashtaka mengine ni kukusanya fedha kwa ajili ya kufanya vitendo vya kigaidi, kukutwa na silaha aina ya bastola na kukutwa na sare za jeshi kinyume cha sheria. Kati ya mashtaka hayo sita, Freeman Mbowe anakabiliwa na mashtaka mawili ambayo ni kula njama na kufadhili vitendo vya kigaidi.
Agosti 9, 2021: Rais Samia azungumzia Kesi ya Mbowe
Rais wa Tanzania Samia Suluhu Hassan licha ya kusema hawezi kuzungumzia zaidi kesi ya Freeman Mbowe kwa kuwa iko Mahakamani, aliiambia BBC kuwa mashtaka dhidi ya kiongozi huyo wa Upinzani hayakuchochewa kwa sababu za kisiasa.
Pamoja na mengine kauli yake hiyo iliibua mjadala mzito kwa wafuatiliaji wa kesi hiyo na siasa za Tanzania kwa ujumla.
Septemba 03, 2021: Kuanza kusikilizwa kwa kesi
Kesi hii ilianza kusikilizwa kwenye Mahakama kuu ya Makosa ya Rushwa na Uhujumu Uchumi ikitokea Mahakama ya Hakimu mkazi Kisutu ambayo haikuwa na mamlaka ya kusikiliza kisheria.
Jaji Elinaza Luvanda alijitoa kusikiliza kesi hiyo kufuatia maombi ya Freeman Mbowe, kwa niaba ya washitakiwa wenzake kudai kuwa hawana Imani na Jaji huyo kama atatenda haki. Nafasi yake akapangiwa Jaji Mustapha Siyani.
Jaji Mustapha Siyani alikuwa jaji wa pili kujitoa kusikiliza kesi hiyo kufuatia kuteuliwa kwake kuwa Jaji kiongozi. Jaji Joachim Tiganga akachukua nafasi yake
Februari 13, 2022: Ushahidi Kufungwa
Ushahidi umefungwa Wiki hii Februari 13, 2021 kwa mashahidi 13 wa upande wa mashtaka kumaliza kutoa ushahidi wao. Kinachosubiriwa sasa ni uamuzi wa Mahakama Kuu hiyo kuamua leo kama Mbowe na wenzie wana kesi ya kujibu ama la.
Jopo la majaji wa Mahakama ya Rufani Tanzania lililojumuisha majaji 3 wa mahakama ya Rufani ambao ni Maige, J.A., Mwandambo, J.A., Khamis, J.A. katika kusikiliza kesi ya Freeman Mbowe dhidi ya DPP, IGP na Mwanasheria mkuu wa serikali
Mahakama ya Rufani Tanzania katika rufaa ya Freeman Mbowe kuhusu kukamatwa isivyo halali Mwanza mwaka 2021 na kutofikishwa mahakamani ndani ya saa 48 imetupwa, kwa kuwa mrufani alipata haki kulalamika mbele ya Mahakama Kuu kuhusu ukiukwaji wa haki ya kufikishwa mahakamani ndani ya saa 48. Na kuwa suala hili ni mtambuka linagusa sheria na katiba ya nchi....
Freeman Aikael Mbowe vs The Director of Public Prosecution & Others (Civil Appeal No. 382 of 2021) [2024] TZCA 836 (30 August 2024)
Kiini cha kesi View attachment 3083020
Mbowe pamoja na wenzake 11 kutoka chama cha Chadema walikamatwa na polisi usiku wa kuamkia Jumatano jijini Mwanza.
21 Julai 2021
Mahakama kuu ya Tanzania imesikiliza kesi ya kikatiba iliowasilishwa na mwenyekiti wa chama kikuu cha upinzani nchini humo Chadema Freeman Mbowe, anadai ukiukwaji wa katiba na sheria wakati wa kukamatwa kwake huko mkoani Mwanza mwezi uliopita.Isikilize ripoti yake Hawa Bihoga.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM
(CORAM: MWANDAMBO. J.A.. MAIGE, 3.A. And KHAMIS, J.A.^
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 382 OF 2021
FREEMAN AIKAEL MBOWE . ....................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION ...................... 1st RESPONDENT
THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ........................... 2nd RESPONDENT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ................................................ 3RD
RESPONDENT
(Appeal from the Ruling and Order of the High Court of Tanzania ,Main Registry at Dares Salaam)
(Mqetta, J.)
dated 23rd day of September, 2021 in
Misc. Civil Application No. 21 of 2021
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
20th & 30th August, 2024
MAIGE. 3.A.:
Article 13 (1) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania,
2017 ("the Constitution"), provides for equality before the law and
prohibits any form of discrimination. Under sub-article (3) thereof, such right and other civic rights set out in part III of the Constitution are justiciable. To ensure that such right is duly protected, sub-article (6)
requires the state authority to put in place procedures which are appropriate or that which observe the following principles
Page 1
might have already affected the appellant, would have not been dealt with by the criminal court. Come what may, in as long as what are alleged to have been committed or omitted are prohibited by statutory laws, they
would, if proved, amount to abuses of powers by the respective
government authorities to the extent that they are utra vires the law. Such an illegal conduct can effectively be addressed by way of ordinary judicial review whose primary purpose is to supervise the legislature and executive
branches where they exceed their statutory powers. This was theposition in the Attorney General v. Dickson Sanga (supra) where it was observed:
"7/7
his oral submissions, the Solicitor General contended that, a remedy of judicial review is available to the accused personf on alleged abuse o f authority by
the DPP. Apart from agreeing with the Solicitor Genera!'it is our firm view that the Constitution which is the
supreme law o f the land frowns on the abuse or misuse
o f procedures in dispensing crim inal justice.
Thus, in case o f any abuse by the DPP the safeguard and remedy is to seek judicial review before the High Court by
invoking the Law Reform (Fatal Accidents and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, [CAP 310 R.E. 2002] as correctly asserted by the Solicitor General."
Yaani Mahakama za Tanzania zina story to carry forward... Mahakama za Pakistan inatoa hukumu bora kuliko mahakama za Tanzania. Can you image this? Wenye akili wachache wataekewa.
Jopo la majaji wa Mahakama ya Rufani Tanzania lililojumuisha majaji 3 wa mahakama ya Rufani ambao ni Maige, J.A., Mwandambo, J.A., Khamis, J.A. katika kusikiliza kesi ya Freeman Mbowe dhidi ya DPP, IGP na Mwanasheria mkuu wa serikali
Mahakama ya Rufani Tanzania katika rufaa ya Freeman Mbowe kuhusu kukamatwa isivyo halali Mwanza mwaka 2021 na kutofikishwa mahakamani ndani ya saa 48 imetupwa, kwa kuwa mrufani alipata haki kulalamika mbele ya Mahakama Kuu kuhusu ukiukwaji wa haki ya kufikishwa mahakamani ndani ya saa 48. Na kuwa suala hili ni mtambuka linagusa sheria na katiba ya nchi....
Freeman Aikael Mbowe vs The Director of Public Prosecution & Others (Civil Appeal No. 382 of 2021) [2024] TZCA 836 (30 August 2024)
Kiini cha kesi View attachment 3083020
Mbowe pamoja na wenzake 11 kutoka chama cha Chadema walikamatwa na polisi usiku wa kuamkia Jumatano jijini Mwanza.
21 Julai 2021
Mahakama kuu ya Tanzania imesikiliza kesi ya kikatiba iliowasilishwa na mwenyekiti wa chama kikuu cha upinzani nchini humo Chadema Freeman Mbowe, anadai ukiukwaji wa katiba na sheria wakati wa kukamatwa kwake huko mkoani Mwanza mwezi uliopita.Isikilize ripoti yake Hawa Bihoga.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM
(CORAM: MWANDAMBO. J.A.. MAIGE, 3.A. And KHAMIS, J.A.^
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 382 OF 2021
FREEMAN AIKAEL MBOWE . ....................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION ...................... 1st RESPONDENT
THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ........................... 2nd RESPONDENT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ................................................ 3RD
RESPONDENT
(Appeal from the Ruling and Order of the High Court of Tanzania ,Main Registry at Dares Salaam)
(Mqetta, J.)
dated 23rd day of September, 2021 in
Misc. Civil Application No. 21 of 2021
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
20th & 30th August, 2024
MAIGE. 3.A.:
Article 13 (1) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania,
2017 ("the Constitution"), provides for equality before the law and
prohibits any form of discrimination. Under sub-article (3) thereof, such right and other civic rights set out in part III of the Constitution are justiciable. To ensure that such right is duly protected, sub-article (6)
requires the state authority to put in place procedures which are appropriate or that which observe the following principles
Page 1
might have already affected the appellant, would have not been dealt with by the criminal court. Come what may, in as long as what are alleged to have been committed or omitted are prohibited by statutory laws, they
would, if proved, amount to abuses of powers by the respective
government authorities to the extent that they are utra vires the law. Such an illegal conduct can effectively be addressed by way of ordinary judicial review whose primary purpose is to supervise the legislature and executive
branches where they exceed their statutory powers. This was theposition in the Attorney General v. Dickson Sanga (supra) where it was observed:
"7/7
his oral submissions, the Solicitor General contended that, a remedy of judicial review is available to the accused personf on alleged abuse o f authority by
the DPP. Apart from agreeing with the Solicitor Genera!'it is our firm view that the Constitution which is the
supreme law o f the land frowns on the abuse or misuse
o f procedures in dispensing crim inal justice.
Thus, in case o f any abuse by the DPP the safeguard and remedy is to seek judicial review before the High Court by
invoking the Law Reform (Fatal Accidents and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, [CAP 310 R.E. 2002] as correctly asserted by the Solicitor General."
Yaani Mahakama za Tanzania zina story to carry forward... Mahakama za Pakistan inatoa hukumu bora kuliko mahakama za Tanzania. Can you image this? Wenye akili wachache wataekewa.
Maana yake DPP, IGP POLISI, Mwanasheria Mkuu wa Serikali wamepewa ruksa kutukamata, kutufungulia kesi, kutukandamiza kisheria bila kuwajibika kutufikisha korti na mahakamani ndani ya saa 48 toka kutiwa nguvuni.
Kesi zingine za watu ambao bado wanashikiliwa bila kufikishwa mahakamani ndani ya saa 48, kwa ruling / tafsiri ya Mahakama ya juu kabisa Tanzania yaani Mahakama ya Rufani Tanzania iliyotolewa leo 30 agosti 2024 itachukuliwa kama ndiyo utaratibu sahihi hadi hapo Katika Mpya itapotamka vinginevyo kuondoa utata wa kisheria unaotoa manufaa kwa DPP na IGP POLISI ....
Tanzania hatuna mahakama, bali majengo yaliyopewa majina ya mahakama. Lakini ndani ya majengo hayo wamejaa maharamia wa CCM kwaajili ya kuihadaa Dunia.
Hukumu ya Sugu iliandikwa na mkuu wa mkoa na viongozi wa CCM wa mkoa, kisha kupewa hakimu kwenda kuisoma mahakamani.
Rostam Aziz naye alikwishatamka kuwa Tanzania haina mahakama, kwani majaji huwa wanapigiwa simu toka ikulu kuwaelekeza wanatakiwa kutoa hukumu ya namna gani.
Kusubiria haki toka mahakama za Tanzania, ni sawa na kumsubiria kenge azae mwanadamu.
Katiba hii ya viraka ambayo bunge hili la chama kimoja huwa halitaki kabisa kutia viraka vingine muhimu kwa ajili ya 4R, kuondoa uchaguzi kusimamiwa na TAMISEMI, wakurugenzi DED wasisimamie uchaguzi mkuu, kuzuia kuchukuliwa bila kufikishwa kituo cha polisi, haki ya kufikishwa mahakamani ndani ya saa 48, wananchi kuhamishwa kwa nguvu ya dola n.k
Hakika tumebanwa haki zetu hadi hapo tutapochukua hatua za kisiasa yaani kujitokeza kwa maandamano makubwa bila kikomo kudai viraka hivyo muhimu ikiwa suala la katiba mpya kuandika inaonekana itachukua muda usio na kikomo
Maxence Melo Mubyazi, MODERATORS WA JAMIIFORUMS WAZIDI KUIKINGIA KIFUA CHAMA DOLA KONGWE KWA KUCHANGANYA WATU:
Moderator wachanganya kesi ya ardhi ya Mbozi Mbeya iliyokuwa Mahakama Kuu ya Tanzania kupinga kuhamishwa kwa nguvu.
Na kesi ya mwenyekiti Freeman Mbowe iliyokuwa Mahakama ya Rufani Tanzania kuhusu kupinga kushikiliwa na Polisi kwa zaidi ya saa 48 bila kufikishwa mahakamani
Mwabukusi apigwa na kitu kizito!
Mwendo ule ule! kama wa Dyansobera!
Mwenye kujua kimombo asome mwenyewe
Kesi imetupiliwa mbali kwa vile eneo bishaniwe halikuwekwa bayana kuweza kulitambua ukubwa wake
Una maana mkuu wa mawakili nchini ameshindwa kesi? Ameshindaje uchaguzi halafu anashindwa kesi?
Inabidi ajiuzuru uenyekiti wa mawakili. Kuongozwa na wakili asiyeshinda kesi ni kudharirisha taaluma.
JamiiForums uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
