Mkataba kati ya DP world na TPA hauna tatizo lolote ila kuna baadhi ya ibara zinatakiwa zifanyiwe mareboresho mfano ibara ya 23

[UmkhontoweSizwe]

Huu ndio uzalendo, ubarikiwe sana
P

Pascal ebu msome mkuu Bams (post # 19) hapo juu uone nondo zake, then ukiweza jibu basi. Great thinkers kama nyie mnapopambanisha hoja sisi makapuku tunanufaika.

 

[Pascal Mayalla]

,

Pascal ebu msome mkuu Bams (post # 19) hapo juu uone nondo zake, then ukiweza jibu basi. Great thinkers kama nyie mnapopambanisha hoja sisi makapuku tunanufaika.

Mkuu UmkhontoweSizwe , asante, ila jf ni home of great minds, we are all equal, hakuna ma GT na makapuku, wote ni sawa, wote humu ni great thinkers kwa viwango vyetu na pia ni makapuku kwa viwango vyetu. Nitamtembelea Mkuu Bams
P

 

[Stroke]

Haka ka jamaa kajinga sana hapo ulipo huna hata buku mbili mfukoni na unashabikia nchi kuuzwa.

 

[MAKULUGA]

Nimeusoma mkataba wa bandari kuna mapungufu machache tu yanayoweza kurekebishika. Watanzania tuondoe wasiwasi tushauri kwa lugha nzuri. Mfano kama ikiwezekana ibara ya 23 ingefanyiwa maboresho ili isituminye sana. Ibara inasema hivi:

ARTICLE 23
DURATION AND TERMINATION
1. Subject to paragraph 2 of this Article 23, this Agreement shall remain in force until occurrence of one of the following: (i) permanent cessation of all Project Activities; or (ii) the expiration of all of the HGAs and all of the Project Agreements (subject to any additions or extensions thereto) and the definite resolution of disputes, if any, thereunder.

2. In the event that a HGA is terminated prior to expiration of its term, this Agreement shall remain in force for the time, and to the extent, required by any State Party or by the Project Company to assert any rights arising from, protect any interests endangered by or bring any proceeding resulting from termination of the HGA. Termination or expiry of a HGA shall not affect any accrued rights, liabilities or remedies of any party under such HGA or the related Project Agreements or this Agreement.

3. The termination of this Agreement shall be subject to the prior consent of the State Parties, such consent is not to be unreasonably withheld.

4. The State Parties shall not be entitled to denounce, withdraw from, suspend or terminate this Agreement in any circumstances, including in the event of material breach, fundamental change of circumstances, severance of diplomatic or consular relations, or any other causes recognised under international law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any dispute between State Parties in respect of such circumstances shall be dealt with in accordance with the requirements of Article 20 of this Agreement.

Nilichokielewa hapo ni hiki:

The Article 23 of the Agreement lies in the lack of clarity and potential limitations regarding the termination of the agreement.

1. Lack of defined termination criteria; The agreement states that it shall remain in force until the occurrence of specific events, such as the permanent cessation of all project activities or the expiration of all Host Government Agreements (HGAs) and Project Agreements. However, the agreement does not provide clear criteria or guidelines for determining when these events have taken place, which could lead to ambiguity and potential disputes.

2. Reliance on termination of HGAs; According to paragraph 2 of Article 23, if a HGA is terminated before its term expires, the agreement remains in force for a certain period to allow the assertion of rights, protection of interests, or the initiation of legal proceedings resulting from the termination. This provision creates dependency on the termination of HGAs and does not account for other circumstances that may warrant the termination of the agreement.

3. Limited termination consent; The agreement stipulates that the termination of the agreement requires the prior consent of the State Parties, which should not be unreasonably withheld. While this provision seems reasonable, the lack of clarity on what constitutes "unreasonable" withholding of consent could potentially lead to disagreements and delays in the termination process.

4. Restriction on termination rights; Article 23(4) explicitly states that the State Parties are not entitled to denounce, withdraw from, suspend, or terminate the agreement under any circumstances, including material breach, fundamental change of circumstances, or severance of diplomatic or consular relations. This provision severely limits the termination rights of the State Parties and may restrict their ability to address significant issues that arise during the course of the agreement.

If possible, Article 23 should be revised and improved because it may potentially lead to disputes and challenges in the event of termination or expiration of the agreement.

 

[Fumadilu Kalimanzila]

Wewe ni tahaira na subiri mtaolewa na hao Waarabu wa Dubai!

 

[denooJ]

Mkataba hauna tatizo ila kuna vipengele / ibara zinatakiwa kufanyiwa marekebisho.

Wewe kweli punguani ?

Nimemshangaa sana.

 

[The Boss]

Nimeusoma mkataba wa bandari kuna mapungufu machache tu yanayoweza kurekebishika. Watanzania tuondoe wasiwasi tushauri kwa lugha nzuri. Mfano kama ikiwezekana ibara ya 23 ingefanyiwa maboresho ili isituminye sana. Ibara inasema hivi:

ARTICLE 23
DURATION AND TERMINATION
1. Subject to paragraph 2 of this Article 23, this Agreement shall remain in force until occurrence of one of the following: (i) permanent cessation of all Project Activities; or (ii) the expiration of all of the HGAs and all of the Project Agreements (subject to any additions or extensions thereto) and the definite resolution of disputes, if any, thereunder.

2. In the event that a HGA is terminated prior to expiration of its term, this Agreement shall remain in force for the time, and to the extent, required by any State Party or by the Project Company to assert any rights arising from, protect any interests endangered by or bring any proceeding resulting from termination of the HGA. Termination or expiry of a HGA shall not affect any accrued rights, liabilities or remedies of any party under such HGA or the related Project Agreements or this Agreement.

3. The termination of this Agreement shall be subject to the prior consent of the State Parties, such consent is not to be unreasonably withheld.

4. The State Parties shall not be entitled to denounce, withdraw from, suspend or terminate this Agreement in any circumstances, including in the event of material breach, fundamental change of circumstances, severance of diplomatic or consular relations, or any other causes recognised under international law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any dispute between State Parties in respect of such circumstances shall be dealt with in accordance with the requirements of Article 20 of this Agreement.

Nilichokielewa hapo ni hiki:

The Article 23 of the Agreement lies in the lack of clarity and potential limitations regarding the termination of the agreement.

1. Lack of defined termination criteria; The agreement states that it shall remain in force until the occurrence of specific events, such as the permanent cessation of all project activities or the expiration of all Host Government Agreements (HGAs) and Project Agreements. However, the agreement does not provide clear criteria or guidelines for determining when these events have taken place, which could lead to ambiguity and potential disputes.

2. Reliance on termination of HGAs; According to paragraph 2 of Article 23, if a HGA is terminated before its term expires, the agreement remains in force for a certain period to allow the assertion of rights, protection of interests, or the initiation of legal proceedings resulting from the termination. This provision creates dependency on the termination of HGAs and does not account for other circumstances that may warrant the termination of the agreement.

3. Limited termination consent; The agreement stipulates that the termination of the agreement requires the prior consent of the State Parties, which should not be unreasonably withheld. While this provision seems reasonable, the lack of clarity on what constitutes "unreasonable" withholding of consent could potentially lead to disagreements and delays in the termination process.

4. Restriction on termination rights; Article 23(4) explicitly states that the State Parties are not entitled to denounce, withdraw from, suspend, or terminate the agreement under any circumstances, including material breach, fundamental change of circumstances, or severance of diplomatic or consular relations. This provision severely limits the termination rights of the State Parties and may restrict their ability to address significant issues that arise during the course of the agreement.

If possible, Article 23 should be revised and improved because it may potentially lead to disputes and challenges in the event of termination or expiration of the agreement.

Mkataba upo sawa tatizo ni English naona.
Mkataba uko very clear kuwa IGA itakufa pale HGA itakufa....
IGA itabaki only kama HGA itakufa kinyume na makubaliano....
Mind you hiyo HGA hatujasaini bado ni miaka mingapi

 

[mbenge]

Mkataba hauna tatizo ila kuna vipengele / ibara zinatakiwa kufanyiwa marekebisho.

Wewe kweli punguani ?

Hivyo vipengele vyenye kulalamikiwa na wadau mbalimbali na kutakiwa kufanyiwa marekebisho ndilo hasa tatizo lenyewe ndani ya mkataba. Sifa mbaya na nzuri kuhusu kitu haziwezi kuwekwa pamoja ili kujenga hoja ya jumla ili kuhitimisha kuhusu uzuri wake.

Huwezi kusema mtu fulani ni muadilifu sana bali tu aache tabia yake mbaya iliyokubuhu ya wizi. Hiyo tabia ya wizi ndiyo sifa yenye kuondoa kabisa uadilifu wake.

 

[Mchokoo]

Hii ni hatari sana!

 

[Pac the Don]

Mfano kama ikiwezekana ibara ya 23 ingefanyiwa maboresho ili isituminye sana. Ibara inasema hivi:

Hilo ndio tatizo lenyewe, iweje useme hauna tatizo? While tatizo lipo na umeliona!!!

 

[Pascal Mayalla]

Meneja wa Makampuni, huu mkataba una matatizo makubwa. Hauna mazuri yoyote.

Sii kweli, matatizo kweli yapo na mazuri pia yapo!, moja ya mazuri hayo ni DPW watainject kwenye uchumi wetu FDI ya maana kuboresha utendaji wa bandari yetu upande wa makasha, kwa sasa kupakua makasha na kuyapanga kunafanywa manual, DPW wanaleta mitambo ya robotics hivyo kuwa automated kwa computer kazi ni ku kongoli tuu!.

Mkataba huu unatakiwa kuutazama kwa mlengo wa kisheria, kibiashara, kiuchumi na kiusalama.

Nakubaliana na wewe

Bandari ya Dar haijazuka tu, tuliijenga kwa pesa nyingi, kuanzia kuchimba ili kupata kina kirefu, kuna majengo, kuna mashine mbalimbali. Ni karibuni tu, wakati wa hayati Magufuli zimewekezwa karibia trilioni 2.

Ni kweli, ule uwekezaji wa trilioni, 2 ni eneo la rics, DPW anapewa beth nyingine sio hiyo ya tics!.

Yeye DP, eti anakuja na dola milioni 500. Halafu atakuwa na umiliki wa 100% kwenye uendeshaji. Na hivyo atachukua faida yote ya asilimia 100. Sisi hakuna chochote zaidi ya kodi. Wewe unaona hili linaingia akilini? Hii ni mali ya asili, tumeifanyia maendelezo.

Sii kwenye, kwanza mkataba ni HGA, bado!, kwenye kila uwekezaji, serikali inakusanya tuu kodi na mwekezaji anachukua faida yote kwa kipindi fulani tuu cha return of investment, akiisharudisha pesa yake na faida, tunagawana mapato. Mbona ndio hivyo kwa mkataba wa bomba la gesi, ndio hivyo kwa PSA 21 za Gesi Asili!. Angalia tarehe ya bandiko hili Gesi asili: Is it "day light robbery?" Watanzania tunaibiwa mchana kweupe!

Kule kwenye madini, mwekezaji anafanya utafiti kwa gharama zake, anajenga mgodi kwa gharama zake, lakini kwa vile tu madini yapo katika ardhi yetu, tunamtoza:

1) mrabaha na inspection fee 7% on gross

2) free carries shares 16%

3) Corporate tax 30%

Huyu mrabaha 0%
Free carried shares 0%
Corporate tax anasema hawezi kulipa 30%, apunguziwe.
Uwekezaji wetu wa matrilioni ya pesa unatupa 0% kwenye faida.
Kuyakubali haya, ni lazima uwe kichaa.

Uingereza, hawa hawa DP, kwa sababu ya uwekezaji walioukuta, biashara imefanywa kuwa ni partnership. Hivyo Uingereza, zaidi ya kodi, wanapata pia gawio la faida kutokana na uwekezaji alioukuta.

Mimi nasubiria HGA

Jambo jingine ni usalama wa nchi. Mkataba unasema DP wanapewa haki ya kuendesha bandari ya Dar lakini yeye ndiye mwenye haki pekee pia ya kuendesha bandari nyingine zote, na haturuhusiwi kumkubalia mwekezaji mwingine.

Sii kweli, subiria HGA!.

Fikiria mmekuwa na mgogoro na DP. DP akaamua kusimamisha huduma kwenye bandari zenu zote. Hicho kipindi chote cha mgogoro na DP, mtaishije? Maana yake hakutakuwa na mzigo wa kuingia wala kutoka. Hiyo si itakuwa crisi ya nchi. Kwa sababu huna options, itabidi umpigie magoti DP ili kuepusha crisis. Hapo nchi tayari itakuwa mtumwa wa DP, kwa sababu yeye atakuwa ameshika mpini, sisi tumeshika makali.

Just be positive !.

P

 

[All truth23]

Nimeusoma mkataba wa bandari kuna mapungufu machache tu yanayoweza kurekebishika. Watanzania tuondoe wasiwasi tushauri kwa lugha nzuri. Mfano kama ikiwezekana ibara ya 23 ingefanyiwa maboresho ili isituminye sana. Ibara inasema hivi:

ARTICLE 23
DURATION AND TERMINATION
1. Subject to paragraph 2 of this Article 23, this Agreement shall remain in force until occurrence of one of the following: (i) permanent cessation of all Project Activities; or (ii) the expiration of all of the HGAs and all of the Project Agreements (subject to any additions or extensions thereto) and the definite resolution of disputes, if any, thereunder.

2. In the event that a HGA is terminated prior to expiration of its term, this Agreement shall remain in force for the time, and to the extent, required by any State Party or by the Project Company to assert any rights arising from, protect any interests endangered by or bring any proceeding resulting from termination of the HGA. Termination or expiry of a HGA shall not affect any accrued rights, liabilities or remedies of any party under such HGA or the related Project Agreements or this Agreement.

3. The termination of this Agreement shall be subject to the prior consent of the State Parties, such consent is not to be unreasonably withheld.

4. The State Parties shall not be entitled to denounce, withdraw from, suspend or terminate this Agreement in any circumstances, including in the event of material breach, fundamental change of circumstances, severance of diplomatic or consular relations, or any other causes recognised under international law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any dispute between State Parties in respect of such circumstances shall be dealt with in accordance with the requirements of Article 20 of this Agreement.

Nilichokielewa hapo ni hiki:

The Article 23 of the Agreement lies in the lack of clarity and potential limitations regarding the termination of the agreement.

1. Lack of defined termination criteria; The agreement states that it shall remain in force until the occurrence of specific events, such as the permanent cessation of all project activities or the expiration of all Host Government Agreements (HGAs) and Project Agreements. However, the agreement does not provide clear criteria or guidelines for determining when these events have taken place, which could lead to ambiguity and potential disputes.

2. Reliance on termination of HGAs; According to paragraph 2 of Article 23, if a HGA is terminated before its term expires, the agreement remains in force for a certain period to allow the assertion of rights, protection of interests, or the initiation of legal proceedings resulting from the termination. This provision creates dependency on the termination of HGAs and does not account for other circumstances that may warrant the termination of the agreement.

3. Limited termination consent; The agreement stipulates that the termination of the agreement requires the prior consent of the State Parties, which should not be unreasonably withheld. While this provision seems reasonable, the lack of clarity on what constitutes "unreasonable" withholding of consent could potentially lead to disagreements and delays in the termination process.

4. Restriction on termination rights; Article 23(4) explicitly states that the State Parties are not entitled to denounce, withdraw from, suspend, or terminate the agreement under any circumstances, including material breach, fundamental change of circumstances, or severance of diplomatic or consular relations. This provision severely limits the termination rights of the State Parties and may restrict their ability to address significant issues that arise during the course of the agreement.

If possible, Article 23 should be revised and improved because it may potentially lead to disputes and challenges in the event of termination or expiration of the agreement.

Sasa hayo uliyoyataja ndo Shida yenyewe

 

[Mzee Mwanakijiji]

Nimeusoma mkataba wa bandari kuna mapungufu machache tu yanayoweza kurekebishika. Watanzania tuondoe wasiwasi tushauri kwa lugha nzuri. Mfano kama ikiwezekana ibara ya 23 ingefanyiwa maboresho ili isituminye sana. Ibara inasema hivi:

ARTICLE 23
DURATION AND TERMINATION
1. Subject to paragraph 2 of this Article 23, this Agreement shall remain in force until occurrence of one of the following: (i) permanent cessation of all Project Activities; or (ii) the expiration of all of the HGAs and all of the Project Agreements (subject to any additions or extensions thereto) and the definite resolution of disputes, if any, thereunder.

2. In the event that a HGA is terminated prior to expiration of its term, this Agreement shall remain in force for the time, and to the extent, required by any State Party or by the Project Company to assert any rights arising from, protect any interests endangered by or bring any proceeding resulting from termination of the HGA. Termination or expiry of a HGA shall not affect any accrued rights, liabilities or remedies of any party under such HGA or the related Project Agreements or this Agreement.

3. The termination of this Agreement shall be subject to the prior consent of the State Parties, such consent is not to be unreasonably withheld.

4. The State Parties shall not be entitled to denounce, withdraw from, suspend or terminate this Agreement in any circumstances, including in the event of material breach, fundamental change of circumstances, severance of diplomatic or consular relations, or any other causes recognised under international law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any dispute between State Parties in respect of such circumstances shall be dealt with in accordance with the requirements of Article 20 of this Agreement.

Nilichokielewa hapo ni hiki:

The Article 23 of the Agreement lies in the lack of clarity and potential limitations regarding the termination of the agreement.

1. Lack of defined termination criteria; The agreement states that it shall remain in force until the occurrence of specific events, such as the permanent cessation of all project activities or the expiration of all Host Government Agreements (HGAs) and Project Agreements. However, the agreement does not provide clear criteria or guidelines for determining when these events have taken place, which could lead to ambiguity and potential disputes.

2. Reliance on termination of HGAs; According to paragraph 2 of Article 23, if a HGA is terminated before its term expires, the agreement remains in force for a certain period to allow the assertion of rights, protection of interests, or the initiation of legal proceedings resulting from the termination. This provision creates dependency on the termination of HGAs and does not account for other circumstances that may warrant the termination of the agreement.

3. Limited termination consent; The agreement stipulates that the termination of the agreement requires the prior consent of the State Parties, which should not be unreasonably withheld. While this provision seems reasonable, the lack of clarity on what constitutes "unreasonable" withholding of consent could potentially lead to disagreements and delays in the termination process.

4. Restriction on termination rights; Article 23(4) explicitly states that the State Parties are not entitled to denounce, withdraw from, suspend, or terminate the agreement under any circumstances, including material breach, fundamental change of circumstances, or severance of diplomatic or consular relations. This provision severely limits the termination rights of the State Parties and may restrict their ability to address significant issues that arise during the course of the agreement.

If possible, Article 23 should be revised and improved because it may potentially lead to disputes and challenges in the event of termination or expiration of the agreement.

Huo mkataba si ushaingiwa au?

 

[MAKULUGA]

Tatizo lilianza pale Mungu Jiwe alipokuwa anamtuma msiadizi wake Kwa wajomba zake!

 

[Urban Edmund]

mkataba wa ulaghai

 

[jahnjez]

Sii kweli, matatizo kweli yapo na mazuri pia yapo!, moja ya mazuri hayo ni DPW watainject kwenye uchumi wetu FDI ya maana kuboresha utendaji wa mandari upande wa makasha, kwa sasa kupakua makasha na kuyapanga kunafanywa manual, DPW wanaleta mitambo ya robotics hivyo kazi ni ku kongoli tuu!.

Nakubaliana na wewe

Ni kweli, ule uwekezaji wa trilioni, 2 ni eneo la rics, DPW anapewa beth nyingine sio hiyo ya tics!.

Sii kwenye, kwanza mkataba ni HGA, bado!, kwenye kila uwekezaji, serikali inakusanya tuu kodi na mwekezaji anachukua faida yote kwa kipindi fulani tuu cha return of investment, akiisharudisha pesa yake na faida, tunagawana mapato. Mbona ndio hivyo kwa mkataba wa bomba la gesi, ndio hivyo kwa PSA 21 za Gesi Asili!. Angalia tarehe ya bandiko hili Gesi asili: Is it "day light robbery?" Watanzania tunaibiwa mchana kweupe!

Mimi nasubiria HGA

Sii kweli, subiria HGA!.

Just be positive !.

P

Nimependa ulivomjibu kwa utulivu

 

[Bams]

Sii kweli, matatizo kweli yapo na mazuri pia yapo!, moja ya mazuri hayo ni DPW watainject kwenye uchumi wetu FDI ya maana kuboresha utendaji wa mandari upande wa makasha, kwa sasa kupakua makasha na kuyapanga kunafanywa manual, DPW wanaleta mitambo ya robotics hivyo kazi ni ku kongoli tuu!.

Nakubaliana na wewe

Ni kweli, ule uwekezaji wa trilioni, 2 ni eneo la rics, DPW anapewa beth nyingine sio hiyo ya tics!.

Sii kwenye, kwanza mkataba ni HGA, bado!, kwenye kila uwekezaji, serikali inakusanya tuu kodi na mwekezaji anachukua faida yote kwa kipindi fulani tuu cha return of investment, akiisharudisha pesa yake na faida, tunagawana mapato. Mbona ndio hivyo kwa mkataba wa bomba la gesi, ndio hivyo kwa PSA 21 za Gesi Asili!. Angalia tarehe ya bandiko hili Gesi asili: Is it "day light robbery?" Watanzania tunaibiwa mchana kweupe!

Mimi nasubiria HGA

Sii kweli, subiria HGA!.

Just be positive !.

P

Kuwa positive haimanishi kutokuwa na upeo wa kuona mambo yanayoweza kutokea.

Ni sawa na mtu anachukua ardhi, anaanza kulima kwa kutegemea mvua, amefanya projections za mapato, unamwuliza, itakuwaje kukiwa na ukame? Halafu akujibu kuwa uwe positive. Yaani usifikirie kabisa kunaweza kuwa na ukame. Huko itakuwa ni kujitia upofu.

DP wana kesi ngapi zinazohusiana na uwekezaji wao nchi mbalimbali? Ujue kunapokuwa na kesi maana yake kuna mgogoro ulioshindwa kutatuliwa kwa njia ya maelewano.

Djibout tu hapo kwa Waafrika wenzetu, nchi inatakiwa kuwalipa DP dola milioni 700 kama fidia wakati uwekezaji wa DP haukufikia hata dola milioni 300.

Hizi kesi kati ya DP na mataifa mengine, ni wakeup call kwetu. Sisi tusijione ni wazuri sana kwa DP. DP inatafuta faida kubwa kupitia uwekezaji na kupitia migogoro.

Mtu mwerevu hujifunza kutokana na makosa ya wenzake. Djibouti walikuwa na mkataba kama huu wa kwetu, wameuvunja, wameishia kutakiwa kuwalipa DP dola milioni 700. Hiyo ni hukumu iliyotolewa na mahakama ya Uingereza.

 

[Sirm]

Kuwa positive haimanishi kutokuwa na upeo wa kuona mambo yanayoweza kutokea.

Ni sawa na mtu anachukua ardhi, anaanza kulima kwa kutegemea mvua, amefanya projections za mapato, unamwuliza, itakuwaje kukiwa na ukame? Halafu akujibu kuwa uwe positive. Yaani usifikirie kabisa kunaweza kuwa na ukame. Huko itakuwa ni kujitia upofu.

DP wana kesi ngapi zinazohusiana na uwekezaji wao nchi mbalimbali? Ujue kunapokuwa na kesi maana yake kuna mgogoro ulioshindwa kutatuliwa kwa njia ya maelewano.

Djibout tu hapo kwa Waafrika wenzetu, nchi inatakiwa kuwalipa DP dola milioni 700 kama fidia wakati uwekezaji wa DP haukufikia hata dola milioni 300.

Hizi kesi kati ya DP na mataifa mengine, ni wakeup call kwetu. Sisi tusijione ni wazuri sana kwa DP. DP inatafuta faida kubwa kupitia uwekezaji na kupitia migogoro.

Mtu mwerevu hujifunza kutokana na makosa ya wenzake. Djibouti walikuwa na mkataba kama huu wa kwetu, wameuvunja, wameishia kutakiwa kuwalipa DP dola milioni 700. Hiyo ni hukumu iliyotolewa na mahakama ya Uingereza.

Na ukipinga Kila kitu unaonekana una asili ya kigoma,
Yaan huoni jema lolote?
Huoni chochote kizuri kinaweza kupatkana?
Ww sio Bure utakua C.E.O wa TICS

 

[Bams]

Na ukipinga Kila kitu unaonekana una asili ya kigoma,
Yaan huoni jema lolote?
Huoni chochote kizuri kinaweza kupatkana?
Ww sio Bure utakua C.E.O wa TICS

Huko ndiko tunaita ni kukosa maarifa. Wewe inaonekana ni mtu mbinafsi sana. Yaani hufanyi lolote jema mpaka uwe mnufaika wa moja kwa moja, ndiyo maana unafikiria kila mtu yupo kama wewe. Kwako huangalii ukweli wa kitu, bali maslahi binafsi.

Ninyi ndio mnaoifanya nchi hii iendelee kuwa duni. Hampo tayari kutetea chochote kilicho sahihi kama hakiwanufaishi moja kwa moja.

Bahati nzuri, sisi wengine, tumeuvuka huo uduni wa utu.

 

[Meneja Wa Makampuni]

Haka ka jamaa kajinga sana hapo ulipo huna hata buku mbili mfukoni na unashabikia nchi kuuzwa.

Kwani Pesa ndio nini boss. Pesa tutakufa tutaziacha bora uzima. Bora uzima. Narudia tena bora uzima. Usiogope kutoa mawazo yako hata kama huna buku mbili mfukoni.