ndolelejiUduhe
JF-Expert Member
- May 16, 2024
- 2,837
- 3,027
Umeonaeee !! 😳
Umeonaeee !! 😳Hakuna penye afadhali.
Na hapo bado mikataba ya Kafulila ya PPP haijaanza kwenda mahakama za kimataifa. Hakuna rangi tutaacha kuona
Hizi hela zikilipwa hawa hawa viongozi wanaenda kuchukua mgao wao
Hakuna cha utemi wala nini hizi ni deals tu !Sababu ya utemi wa kijinga..!!
Uhitaji Google kukusaidia unahitaji kujifunza terms za mkataba. Hizo ndio ukivunja unashitakiwa, mahala gani depends mmkataba husika unasemaje.Hivi unadharau MIGA? Ungekuwa na akili ungekwenda ku GOOGLE ukajuwa uhusiano wa MIGA, CISD na World Bank. Ungekuwa na akili ungetafuta sababu kwa nini moja ya ndege zetu kwa nini zinashikiliwa huko Netherlands na tuna kesi ngapi zinaendelea CISD kwa kupuuza ushauri wa Lissu kuhusu MIGA
Hayo si makusanyo ya mwezi mmoja tu TRA. Yanalipika hayo.Na badooo!
- Winshear Gold Corp - USD 30 million sawa na Tshs. 79,500,000,000.00
- Ntaka Hill - USD 90 million sawa na Tshs. 238,500,000,000.00
- Montero - USD 27 million sawa na Tshs. 71,550,000,000.00
- Aqua Power - USD 500 million sawa na Tshs 1,325,000,000,000.00
- JUMLA 1,714,000,000,000.00
Ni kwa sababu wanapeleka watu wasio na uwezo kutetea hizo kesi.Iwe MIGA au isiwe MIGA haibadilishi cho chote, tutaendelea kuchapwa mboko tu na hao wazungu. Kichekesho gani hiki?
Baada ya hii mikataba kulipwa fine zake wote waliosaini walitakiwa wawe jela kwa hasara waliotuingiza.Sababu ya utemi wa kijinga..!!
Ila cha ajabu hizo kesi zimeibuliwa wakati Magu hayupoMikataba alivunja magufuli kesi zikafunguliwa hukumu imetoka magufuli amefariki na kumbuka aliyeshtakiwa ni Tanzania na sio magufuli ila aliyevunja mikataba ni magufuli
Magu alivunja mkataba kihuniIla cha ajabu hizo kesi zimeibuliwa wakati Magu hayupo
Acha uongo mkataba wowote una-mambo ya kuangali ya msingiNi kwa sababu wanapeleka watu wasio na uwezo kutetea hizo kesi.
Sakata DPW wanasheria wengi wa Tanzania walishindwa kuelewa ‘IGA’ ni kitu gani, maswala ya mikataba wanasheria wa Tanzania wanapwaya sana.
Wewe umesoma finance na mba mambo ya contract law umesoma wapiUhitaji Google kukusaidia unahitaji kujifunza terms za mkataba. Hizo ndio ukivunja unashitakiwa, mahala gani depends mmkataba husika unasemaje.
Unapo sign ‘bilateral treaty’ hiyo ni implied term ya mkataba hata kama sio written on the actual contract; breach watu wanaweza tumia kama inaruhusu kufungua madai nje ya nchi.
Eco-village wametumia Sweden-Tanzania bilateral treaty kukamata hiyo ndege.
Shida yenu kuongelea mambo ambayo hamna abc nayo mnatumia common sense; badala ya discipline knowledge. Ndio maana Lissu anawachota, take it from Lissu hajui mambo ya contract law. Sasa we jichuze siku umpeleke mahakamani uone kama atashinda kesi.
Uwezi kujiandikia vitu tu kutoka kichwani kwako based on common sense rationale, ni lazima ujifunze hata foundation knowledge ya discipline husika.
Umekazana na MIGA kisa Lissu kakwambia tu, leta ushahidi huna. Mimi sijiandikii kama wewe, ila nina abc za contract law in general na nimeandika hayo mambo ya uwekezaji.
Wewe unabisha tu kutumia akili zako mwenyewe lakini huna elementary knowledge ya maswala ya mikataba.
Ndio shida yenu you think you can argue on common sense only kwenye kila kitu.
Chukua huu ushauri utakusaidia kwenye debates, soma kwanza kuhusu topic husika kabla ya kupotezea watu muda.Acha uongo mkataba wowote una-mambo ya kuangali ya msingi
Haya nayo tena ni-magumu ayo ya iga na mengine ni mbwembwe tu
- Unaangali kodi
- Unaangalia vitu vitakavyosababisha mkataba kuvunjwa
- Unaangalia mda wa mkataba
- Mwekezaji asipotimiza wajibu wake anafanyiwa nini
- Kesi zako na mwekezaji mtatumia mahakama za nchi ipi na sheria zipi
Hivyo ulivyotaja havina-tofauti na nilivyoandika ni kwamba umetumia tu kingerezaChukua huu ushauri utakusaidia kwenye debates, soma kwanza kuhusu topic husika kabla ya kupotezea watu muda.
Unajiandikia tu upuuzi na kuchosha watu, halafu kwenye kichwa chako unadhani umeandika vitu vya maana.
Mkataba una aspects tano:
Offer/acceptance
Consideration
Capacity
Privity
Intention to form legal relation.
Acha kuandika mambo ya kuchosha watu na kutaka wajibu ujinga wako. Kama basics tu hujui utaelewa aina ya terms za mkataba.
Utakuwa una shida kichwani sio bure kwa huo un’gan’ganizi wako.Hivyo ulivyotaja havina-tofauti na nilivyoandika ni kwamba umetumia tu kingereza
Kuandika mkatana ni art hakuna sheria inasema iwe hivi ila kuna mambo ya msingi lazima yawepo
Tatizo lako umekariri mambo ya darasani ambayo ni tofauti na dunia yaani unachukulia mambo ya academic exercise na mikataba ya kibiashara
Mkataba hauna aspect tano zinaweza zikawa hata 10 kulingana na anayetaka kuandika
Acha kukariri na kutishia watu
Tatizo lako umekariri maishaUtakuwa una shida kichwani sio bure kwa huo un’gan’ganizi wako.
Unataka nijadili mambo ya PSA/Concession agreements wakati hata elementary knowledge ya contract law huna.
Nilishakubaliana na wewe Magufuli ndio kaleta yote haya, bado tu ujaridhika.
Unaandika mambo hata nikikuuliza hiyo ni sehemu ya clause gani uwezi jibu kwa sababu hujui your stabilisation clause to dispute resolution let alone terms implied by national laws before a breach is persued
Mimi sijiandikii upuuzi kama wewe nimewasikiliza hao wanasheria kwenye kesi ya Indiana hawana uwezo kabisa hakuna sehemu wamezungumzia issue za performance ya mwekezaji.
Na wewe ndio poyoyo unaendika ujinga mtupu hujui lolote zaidi ya kulałama tu Magufuli ndio kasababisha.
Sio kwamba sitaki tujadiliane kuelimishana ni afya; shida ni kwamba wewe hata abc huna sasa kukueleza hadi upate concept tu ya mkataba dah huo muda sina kwakweli.
Dogo embu tafuta sinema ya kichina YouTube utoe stress uone sterling anavyo watangwa bad guys, kung fu mpaka hewani.Tatizo lako umekariri maisha
Kuandika mkataba ni art ingekua kuandika mikataba nikama unavyotaka kuaminisha watu basi mikataba yote ingekua mizuri huku dunia sababu watu wangefuata formula wewe unayoisemea
Ila bahati mbaya tukija mikataba ya kibiashara ya mabilion inahitaji art kubwa sana kuiandika sababu kila mtu/kampuni inajaribu kuvutia kwake
Mfano Tanzania tuliingia mkataba na makampuni ya madini kule kanda ya ziwa ila ni zaidi ya miaka 20 kanda ya ziwa kuna umaskini wa kutisha inamaa kuna mambo ya msingi kwenye mkataba hatukuyazingatia mfano
Hayo mambo mawili kwenye mkata na wale wakina barrick, north mara na wengineo hayakuwepo ndo maana ile migodi haina mchango wa maana kwenye nchi yaani wanazidiwa mpaka na wachimbaji wadogo kwenye kulipa kodi we unaona ni sawa
- Kodi mpaka sahivi uchanguaji wa ile migodi kwenye kodi ni mdogo sana hili ni tatizo kubwa sana lililopo kwenye ule mkataba na yale makampuni ya madini
- Ile migodi zaidi ya miaka 20 bila hata kujenga smelter hili ni tatizo kubwa la kimkataba ingekua baada ya mda flani labda miaka 5 wajenge smelter ili wasiwe wanapelekea makinikia nje na kujenga smelter ni ela ya kawaida
Wewe balaa ujikite na mambo ya msingi ya mkataba mara umejikita na consideration, capacity na mambo mengine ambayo hayana msaada kwa nchi huku ukiacha maswala ya kodi ambayo ndo ya muhimu kupita maelezo
Wewe ndiye uliye mjinga mara 1,000,000 maana kwanza ni wazi hujui hata maana ya MIGA...Si ndio maana mnashindwa kesi kila siku, umewahi kuona kesi ya dispute imepelekwa huko MIGA toka uzaliwe au hata umewai sikia ‘claimant’ anataja neno MIGA kama source of breach.
Akili za Lissu kuna wasaa zinamtosha yeye na wafuasi huko CDM.
Ungekuwa Unafahamu tofauti ya litigation na ADR usingeandika huo upuuzi maana hujui hata ICSID ni chombo cha aina gani kisheria.Wewe ndiye uliye mjinga mara 1,000,000 maana hujui hata maana ya MIGA...
Masikini wa akili na ufahamu wewe unashindwa kuelewa kuwa ICSID ambako mnapelekwa na kuchinjwa ni mkono wa MIGA...
Kukutoa ujinga tu ni kuwa:
Wakati umefika kwa serikali kuajiri mawakaili toka nje ya nchi. Unakuta jitu linajiita wakili msomi kumbe hata kujieleza au kuitetea nchi hawezi ila akirudi Bongo Kiingereza kiiiingi kama wanafunzi wa UDSM ila hawajuwi lolote. Hii elimu ya kukariri kwa kweli inatulostisha watanzania sana, yaani tunakariri hata namna ya kuishi?TORONTO, Nov. 20, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Montero Mining and Exploration Ltd. (TSX-V: MON) (“Montero” or the “Company”) is pleased to report a US$27,000,000 settlement has been reached with the United Republic of Tanzania (“Tanzania”) in the dispute arising out of the expropriation of Montero’s Wigu Hill rare earth element project (“Wigu Hill”).
The settlement sum of US$27,000,000 (approximately CDN $38,000,000) due to Montero is payable in just over 3 months, with payments scheduled as follows:
- US$12,000,000– payable by 20 November 2024 –PAYMENT RECEIVED
- US$8,000,000– on or before 31 January 2025
- US$7,000,000– on or before 28 February 2025
The settlement sum represents ~39% of the US$70,000,000 initially claimed by Montero. This settlement obviates the need for a costly and time-consuming hearing, the risk of an adverse award, enforcement efforts, and finally concludes a near 7-year dispute.
Dr Tony Harwood, President and CEO of Montero commented: “I am pleased Montero was able to reach an amicable settlement with the government of Tanzania to bring a mutually beneficial end to this dispute. This resolution allows both parties to move forward, and we wish Tanzania every success in attracting new mining investment. I would like to thank our shareholders, board, management, and our legal and technical teams, for their valuable contribution to this outcome.”
ICSID Arbitration
Montero and Tanzania have sent a joint request to the arbitral tribunal to suspend the ICSID arbitration proceedings, as the first payment has been received by Montero. Subsequent payments are to be made by the specified dates provided. Provided the final payment has been received by Montero, the parties will request the arbitral tribunal discontinue the ICSID arbitration altogether.
Distribution of Funds
Montero and its litigation funding partner, Omni Bridgeway (Canada) will receive a distribution of the first payment. The second instalment will be distributed to Omni Bridgeway (Canada) and to Montero, and will also cover Montero's operational needs and legal expenses, including payments to Boies Schiller Flexner UK LLP and Jeantet AARPI. Montero will entirely retain the final instalment.
Montero is planning a return of capital to shareholders where no amount has yet been determined and is subject to accounting review and board approval. In addition, Montero will retain funds to cover legal, taxation, and administrative expenses, including potential costs for arbitral proceedings, or enforcement actions if the second or third instalments are delayed or unpaid. The net amount of the award after repayment to the funder and legal expenses cannot be estimated with certainty and no assurances can be made. Further announcements will be made in due course.
Acknowledgments
The Board would like to especially thank Dr. Tony Harwood for reaching this settlement. Without his perseverance and significant efforts to not only develop Wigu Hill initially, but to then safeguard and recover Montero’s investment speaks to his dedication and commitment to the Company and shareholders. Special thanks also to directors, the balance of management, our loyal shareholders, legal advisers and accounting team for their steadfast support and dedication throughout nearly seven years of efforts to secure compensation for the Company’s investment in the Wigu Hill Rare Earth Project. Montero’s legal team includes Timothy Foden of Boies Schiller Flexner (UK) LLP and Martin Tavaut of Jeantet AARPI. Quantum and technical expertise provided by Dr. Neal Rigby of SRK Consulting (USA) Inc. with full dispute funding secured from Omni Bridgeway, a leading global dispute funder. This unwavering commitment enabled the Board to achieve a favourable outcome for the benefit of shareholders.
Disclaimer
The conclusion of the ICSID arbitration and payment of the remaining instalments is conditional on Tanzania’s compliance with the settlement agreement. The agreement does not provide for any security for the benefit of Montero in case Tanzania would not pay any instalment, in which case Montero can either resume the ICSID arbitration or seek enforcement of the settlement agreement.
About Montero
Montero has agreed to a US$27,000,000 settlement amount to end its dispute with the United Republic of Tanzania for the expropriation of the Wigu Hill rare earth element project. Montero will continue to seek a joint venture partner to advance its Avispa copper-molybdenum project in Chile. Montero’s board of directors and management have an impressive track record of successfully discovering and advancing precious metal and copper projects. Montero trades on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol MON and has 50,122,975 shares outstanding.
SOURCE: Montero Agrees to US$27 Million Settlement from Tanzania
The issue in question is Tundu Lissu vs MIGA. Ukasema hajui lolote na tunaomsikiliza hatunazo, au siyo?Ungekuwa Unafahamu tofauti ya litigation na ADR usingeandika huo upuuzi maana hujui hata ICSID ni chombo cha aina gani kisheria.
Unaelewa maana ya MIGA & ICSID (their objectives & how they work?). Na unaelewa kuwa Tanzania ni mwanachama hizi multilateral Organizations ambazo ziko chini ya WB...?Pili unadhani watu wanaweza kukufungulia kesi ya madai tu kama hizo terms sio expressed kwenye contract clauses au mwekezaji nchi yake ina BIT na host nation.
Still hueleweki...Ili ushitakiwe nje ya nchi hayo mambo lazima either yapo expressed kwenye stabilisation clause ya mkataba husika au watatumia BIT (hiyo term implied by law) kwenye mkataba.
Ingekuwa ni mwalimu wako na unaandika insha ya namna hii ningekulima 0%. Maana sioni mantiki ya unachoelezea hapa na kutetea...Vinginevyo ukurupuki tu na kuifungulia nchi kesi ya madai popote unapojisikia kama huna BIT wala expressed ADR processes kwenye stabilisation clause hiyo arbitration itakutimua tu.
ABC za topic ipi ambayo mimi sina lakini wewe unazo...?Ni hivi acheni kukadhania arguments wakati abc za topic husika hamna na kuleta hoja za kutoka vichwani mwenu au za kuambiwa na Lissu.