Mtume Muhammad: Jamii isipotoshwe; Jua huzama katika Chemchemu ya matope Meusi na Mazito

Status
Not open for further replies.


NIKIMALIZA NA MAMBO YA MSALABA NITAKUJA HUKU ; DAWA IKO JIKONI
 
Hilo Neno HAWEZI NI allah ndio HAWEZI ilaha MUNGU Wangu ANAWEZA na AMEWEZA [emoji123] [emoji106] Yaani mungu wako hana uwezo wa kuwa na mwana mpaka angonoke as kama dume la ng'ombe haliwezi kuwa na mwana hadi angonoke na kumtia mimba mbuguma [emoji53] [emoji12] hivyo sishangai kauli yako ya Neno HAWEZI ndivyo ulivyo lelewa na Malezi yamekufanya kilema [emoji4]
 
Ahahhahahaahaahahahahha mbona umekuwa mkali ndio nyie mnatangaza Mungu kavuliwa nguo kabaki na kibukta , huu ni ujinga wa kiwango kikubwa, Mungu awezi kuwa mtu ata wewe akili yako ndogo inalijua hilo sema ni mahaba yanakutesa
 
twende kisla kisla hivyo hivyo [emoji4] Mungu ni Mtawala Wa viumbe vyote [emoji106] nae Mwanadamu ni Mtawala..kwa akili za kisla kisla unaona Tawala zoote hizo wanatawala kwa HAQI [emoji12]
 
mgen said:
Hata hapa [emoji117] View attachment 875289 hujaelewa [emoji53] acha mahaba na maksudi [emoji15] [emoji12]
Click to expand...


Wakati wowote Yesu anapoonekana amekosea na ameshindwa kudhihirisha nguvu zake kubwa akiwa Mwana wa Mungu,
Wakristo wanajikinga kwa kudai ya kwamba yeye alikosea akiwa mtu siyo akiwa mungu.

Kwahiyo tunayo kila haki ya kuuliza na kujua waziwazi sehemu gani ndani yake ilikuwa mtu na ipi mungu.

Kukaa kwa mtu ndani ya Yesu kunataka ubongo wa 'mtu' mbali na ubongo wa 'mungu' ndani yake.

Ubongo ulipohuika basi 'mtu' ndani ya Yesu alihuika, kwani Uungu wa Yesu hauhitaji ubongo wa kiwiliwili ili kumsaidia.

Ubongo huo wa kiwiliwili uliingiwa tu na mungu alipokuwa ardhini mara ya kwanza, jinsi inavyokuwa katika mambo ya roho kwamba kitu fulani kinakuwa chombo ama njia ya kudhihirisha onyesho la kiroho. Basi kuhuika Yesu kutamaanisha kuhuika mtu ndani ya Yesu, kwani pasipo kuwa hivyo haiwezekani roho yake kurejea ndani ya mwili huo.

Kama jambo hilo halikubaliwi, hapo tutalikabili tatizo jingine la kukubali kwamba Yesu alikuwa na bongo mbili mbalimbali za
kujitegemea pindi alipokuwa duniani humu: Ubongo mmoja wa 'mtu' na mwingine wa 'mungu', zote mbili zikikaa mahali pamoja, lakini hazikulingana bali kila mmoja unajitegemea.

Kama ni hivyo, basi suala la kuhuika lichunguzwe upya ili uhakika wake hasa utambulikane. Basi hamna haja tena ya kufikiria ubongo wa kibinadamu kufanyizwa upya ili kuipatia dhamiri mahali pa kukalia. Bali twahitaji kufikiria kwamba Yesu analitembelea tena fuvu la kichwa cha mtu aliyekuwa mwenyeji wake wa zamani, ambamo ndani ya fuvu hilo mna masazo ya ubongo yaliyooza.

Kadiri tunavyochunguza kwa uangalifu zaidi suala hilo, ndivyo yanavyojitokeza matatizo zaidi katika kila daraja la uchunguzi.

Mtu anahitaji ubongo kuwa chombo cha mfuatano wa fikira.

Kuhusu kazi zinazofanywa na mwili wa kiwiliwili ni kwamba kama tukiamini kuwa dhamiri inakuwapo peke yake na inaishi
kwa kujitegemea, basi hiyo itamaanisha kwamba dhamiri na roho ni kitu kilekile kimoja. Waweza kuita dhamiri ama roho lakini
inaishi peke yake hata kama uhusiano wake na ubongo wa mtu unakatika.

Lakini kama dhamiri au roho inahitajika ili kuutawala mwili wa mtu ama inaathirika na yanayotokea katika ufalme wake
wa kiwiliwili, hapo bila shaka unahitajika ufungamano madhubuti baina ya dhamiri na ubongo ama roho na ubongo. La sivyo, hivyo (roho na ubongo) haviwezi kabisa kuathiri, kuhimiza au kutawala mafuatano ya kimwili na ya kiakili ama ya ki-maono katika mtu.

Naona hilo halina haja ya kujadiliwa.

Hilo linatuongoza kwenye tatizo jingine kubwa zaidi: Je, anayefanywa kuwa Mwana wa Mungu anahitaji kuutawala ama
kusimamia mwili kwa njia ya ubongo?

Na je, yeye anautegemea ubongo wa kiwiliwili kwa mfuatano wa fikra zake?

Kama yeye anavuka mipaka yote ya kibinadamu, na kama yeye anao mfumo wa kujitegemea wa mfuatano wa fikira ambao ni wa pekee kwake usiyo na kifani katika ulimwengu mzima aliouumba, hapo kurejea roho ya Mungu katika mwili wa mtu pamoja na dhamiri ya mtu kunaleta natija isiyolingana na akili yaani kupatikana kwa dhati iliyo na mifuatano miwili ya fikra inayopingana, kwani haiwezekani kwa dhamiri na roho ya mtu kulingana kikamilifu na dhamiri na dhati ya Mungu.

Kutakuwa na upinzani wa kudumu baina ya mifuatano hiyo miwili utakaosababisha mapambano ya kusumbua baina ya mawimbi ya ubongo.

Mwenye shida hiyo anafaa kutibiwa na mtaalamu wa utibabu wa maradhi ya roho mwenye uwezo zaidi ya mtu.

Huo pengine ndiyo ugonjwa mpya wa roho uitwao schizophrenia kwa Kiingereza.

INAENDELEA
 
Huyu jamaa ata anachosimamia hakijui sasa hapo unataka kusema kitu gani ambacho ni cha ajabu labda aiseee Ahahahahaha kwani Mohammad akuikomboa Makkah?
 
mgen said:
twende kisla kisla hivyo hivyo [emoji4] Mungu ni Mtawala Wa viumbe vyote [emoji106] nae Mwanadamu ni Mtawala..kwa akili za kisla kisla unaona Tawala zoote hizo wanatawala kwa HAQI [emoji12]
Click to expand...
Ndio umeuliza kitu gani ?ebu tuliza jazba njoo hapa na maswali yakueleweka ahahaaaaahhahhahahhahah utaelewa tu
 
Muhammad spectacularly failed a test of his prophethood:

THE PREEMINENT SUNNI HADITH COLLECTION, Sahih Bukhari, contains a long narrative wherein Muhammad's claim to prophethood is examined by a member of one of the JEWISH TRIBES OF MEDINA. Those who heard him were convinced that he passed this test with flying colors, but closer inspection reveals that this supposedly definitive vindication of Muhammad's prophethood is nothing of the sort.

Here is the tradition (Sahih Bukhari 4:55:546): "When 'Abdullah bin Salam heard the arrival of the Prophet at Medina, he came to him and said, "I am going to ask you about three things which nobody knows except a prophet:

What is the first portent of the Hour?

What will be the first meal taken by the people of Paradise?

Why does a child resemble its father, and why does it resemble its maternal uncle?

" Allah's Apostle said, "GABRIEL.HAS JUST NOW TOLD ME THEIR ANSWERS." 'Abdullah said, "He (i.e. Gabriel), from amongst all the angels, is the enemy of the Jews." Allah's Apostle said, "The first portent of the Hour will be a fire that will bring together the people from the east to the west;

the first meal of the people of Paradise will be Extra-lobe (caudate lobe) of fish-liver. As for the resemblance of the child to its parents:

If a man has sexual intercourse with his wife and gets discharge first, the child will resemble the father, and if the woman gets discharge first, the child will resemble her."


Consider for a moment how absurd and strange this ‘test’ is. Abdullah bin Salam asks Muhammad three questions that only a prophet will know the answer to. The question must immediately be: HOW ON EARTH DID HE KNOW THAT MOHAMMAD IS CORRECT IF ONLY A PROPHET CAN KNOW THE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION?

Muslims are left with three equally unpalatable options:


Option #1
- Abdullah bin Salam was a prophet himself. This would be seriously at odds with Islamic teaching that states that Muhammad was the final and sole prophet to the Arab peoples. ANOTHER PROPHET OPERATING alongside him within Arab lands would be inconceivable.


Option #2
- Abdullah bin Salam was an opportunist who played a confidence trick on Muhammad. If Bin Salam was not a prophet, as Muslim tradition would surely have to affirm, he could NOT KNOW THE ANSWERS to the questions that he was asking. It is, therefore, quite likely that he saw the writing on the wall in terms of the growing dominance of the Muslims and, therefore, sought a way to switch his allegiance. Muhammad must have realized that not answering the questions would damage his reputation, so he played along and thus boosted both his own and Bin Salam's credibility.


Option #3
- Abdullah bin Salam was an ignorant fool who did not notice the logical inconsistency in his questions. If Bin Salam did not realize that he as a non-prophet could not go around asking questions that only prophets would know the answers to, he probably did not have the kind of intellect that you would trust to solve the deep questions of life!
In addition to the silliness of this test, it should also be noted that Muhammad gets the third answer (supposedly whispered to him by Gabriel) COMPLETELY WRONG! Muhammad says: "If a man has sexual intercourse with his wife and gets discharge first, the child will resemble the father, and if the Muhammad spectacularly failed a test of his prophethood:


The preeminent Sunni hadith collection, Sahih Bukhari, contains a long narrative wherein Muhammad's claim to prophethood is examined by a member of one of the Jewish tribes of Medina. Those who heard him were convinced that he passed this test with flying colors, but closer inspection reveals that this supposedly definitive vindication of Muhammad's prophethood is nothing of the sort. Here is the tradition (Sahih Bukhari 4:55:546): "When 'Abdullah bin Salam heard the arrival of the Prophet at Medina, he came to him and said, "I am going to ask you about three things which nobody knows except a prophet: What is the first portent of the Hour? What will be the first meal taken by the people of Paradise? Why does a child resemble its father, and why does it resemble its maternal uncle?" Allah's Apostle said, "Gabriel has just now told me of their answers." 'Abdullah said, "He (i.e. Gabriel), from amongst all the angels, is the enemy of the Jews." Allah's Apostle said, "The first portent of the Hour will be a fire that will bring together the people from the east to the west; the first meal of the people of Paradise will be Extra-lobe (caudate lobe) of fish-liver. As for the resemblance of the child to its parents: If a man has sexual intercourse with his wife and gets discharge first, the child will resemble the father, and if the woman gets discharge first, the child will resemble her."
Consider for a moment how absurd and strange this ‘test’ is. Abdullah bin Salam asks Muhammad three questions that only a prophet will know the answer to. The question must immediately be: How on earth did he know that Muhammad was correct if only a prophet can know the answer to the questions? Muslims are left with three equally unpalatable options:


Option #1 - Abdullah bin Salam was a prophet himself. This would be seriously at odds with Islamic teaching that states that Muhammad was the final and sole prophet to the Arab peoples. Another prophet operating alongside him within Arab lands would be inconceivable.


Option #2 - Abdullah bin Salam was an opportunist who played a confidence trick on Muhammad. If Bin Salam was not a prophet, as Muslim tradition would surely have to affirm, he could not know the answers to the questions that he was asking. It is, therefore, quite likely that he saw the writing on the wall in terms of the growing dominance of the Muslims and, therefore, sought a way to switch his allegiance. Muhammad must have realized that not answering the questions would damage his reputation, so he played along and thus boosted both his own and Bin Salam's credibility.


Option #3 - Abdullah bin Salam was an ignorant fool who did not notice the logical inconsistency in his questions. If Bin Salam did not realize that he as a non-prophet could not go around asking questions that only prophets would know the answers to, he probably did not have the kind of intellect that you would trust to solve the deep questions of life!
In addition to the silliness of this test, it should also be noted that Muhammad gets the third answer (supposedly whispered to him by Gabriel) completely wrong!

Muhammad says:
"If a man has sexual intercourse with his wife and gets discharge first, the child will resemble the father, and if the woman gets discharge first, the child will resemble her."




I probably do not need to spell out why this is plainly ridiculous. Suffice it to say that modern science will confirm that order of sexual climax plays no role whatsoever in the genetic makeup of any resultant offspring, contrary to Muhammad's claim. Any female ‘discharge’ during sex will also not fulfill any reproductive role. Muhammad's answer therefore tells us a lot about how desert Arabs saw the process of reproduction while at the same time disproving his prophetic claims.
 
Islamic tradition acknowledges that Muhammad was susceptible to deception:


Some very interesting hadiths speak of the fact that Muhammad was deceived by ‘magic’ several times during his career.

For example:
Narrated Aisha: “A man called Labid bin al-A ‘sam from the tribe of Bani Zariq worked magic on Allah’s Apostle until Allah’s Apostle started imagining that he had done a thing that he had not really done.” (Sahih Bukhari 7:071:658)


Narrated Aisha: “Magic was worked on Allah‘s Apostle so that he used to think that he had sexual relations with his wives while he actually had not.” (Sahih Bukhari 7:71:660)


All of this leaves us with the following question: If Muhammad was so easily bewitched, how can we be sure that parts of the Qur’an were not revealed while he was ‘under the influence’?

 
Ahahhhhaaahhahahahahahahahahahhahah umeamua upambane na gavana ahahahahahahhahhahhhahah kweli maumivu yalikuwa makali
 
Hizi zote tumeshajibu leta mpya ahahahahahah au ndio jazba la gavana unaamua kulipiza ata ikirudiwa mara 100
 
The way in which Muhammad died casts serious doubts on his prophetic claims:


We have already encountered the apostasy of Ibn Abi Sarh, Muhammad's former scribe. At issue was the charge that Muhammad allowed Abi Sarh to make changes to the Qur'an and that he became disillusioned about how easily the supposedly eternal word of Allah could be changed. These events could obviously cause serious damage to Muhammad's reputation. As a means of damage control Allah sends down another one of his many ‘convenient revelations’:

"And if the messenger were to invent any sayings in Our name. We should certainly seize him by his right hand, And We should certainly then cut off the artery of his heart (aorta)" (Qur'an 69:44-46)



So the Qur'an here makes a rather stark claim: If Muhammad dies through the cutting of his aorta, he is guilty of the charge of adding to the Qur'an.


So how did Muhammad die according to the most venerable Islamic traditions?
The answer is absolutely staggering if you are a believing Muslim!

The details of Muhammad's death are very well known. He was given poisoned meat by a Jewish lady as revenge for his actions against her people at the Battle of Khaybar. Interestingly, she placed the poison in the meat as a test of his prophethood, stating

“If he was a prophet he will be informed of what I have done.”

What is even more interesting, in the context of Qur'an 69:44-46, is that there are several strong traditions that state that Muhammad died through the cutting of his aorta:

"The Prophet in his ailment in which he died, used to say, “O Aishah! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison.” (Sahih Bukhari 5:59:713);

and:

"He then said about the pain of which he died: I continued to feel pain from the morsel which I had eaten at Khaibar. This is the time when it has cut off my aorta." (Sunan Abu Dawud 4498)
.

These statements are nothing short of remarkable.
ALLAH SAYS THAT MOHAMMAD WOUPD DIE THROUGH HIS AORTA BEING CUT IF HE CHANGED THE QURAN, and it turns out that this is exactly the way in which he died!

Muslims will vigorously question the reliability of these traditions. It needs to be pointed out, however, that they come from some of the most highly respected sources within the traditions of Islam itself and not from the writings of some virulent critic of Islam.

Discussing how and why they entered into the tradition is probably a matter for debate that will not be solved here. Suffice it to say, that the survival of these traditions poses some incredibly serious questions to the Muslim people of the world.
 
Gavana said:
wapige nyundo tu nakuachia uwanja dr.😀😀
Click to expand...
Naona kuna jamaa kaamua aige utaratibu wako ila yeye anaamisha huko anakuja kupaste huku ndio maana mpaka anarudia ambacho tulishajibu muda mrefu ahahahhaahahaaahhahaa
 
Nantahulila said:
Napenda uyafanyie majibu yangu kazi kwa kuyacrush kusudi nikuelewe vizuri wewe mwalimu wangu
Click to expand...
Ndio maana nataka usome hiyo link andaa swali moja moja nami ntayajibu hapo ndio tutakapo elewana vizuri ndugu yangu, hiyo ndio njia bora ya kujifunza maswali na majibu
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…