Mtume Muhammad: Jamii isipotoshwe; Jua huzama katika Chemchemu ya matope Meusi na Mazito

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wagalatia nani kaingiza hizo takataka kwenye biblia ahhahaahahaahaahhaahahahaaqhq eti WAKORINTHO ahahahahahhah
Wee nikujibu Mara ngapi kwamba kambishie allah tena kamrushie mate MIMI hayanihusugl [emoji15] [emoji12]
 
Kamkoromee muhammad aliye kwambia usipoamini umesha potelea mbali MIMI sie niliye kuagiza uamini [emoji53] wee vipi akili yako haina akili nini [emoji12]


The Gospel of Matthew:

"The unknown author, whom we shall continue to call Matthew for the sake of convenience, drew no only up the Gospel according to Mark but upon a large body of material (principally, sayings of Jesus) not found in Mk that corresponds, sometimes exactly, to material found also in the Gospel according to Luke. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1008)"

"As for the place where the gospel was composed, a plausible suggestion is that it was Antioch, the capital of the Roman province of Syria. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1009)"

So we clearly see, both the author or authors and the place of composition of the "Gospel of Matthew" are unknown.
 
Wee nikujibu Mara ngapi kwamba kambishie allah tena kamrushie mate MIMI hayanihusugl [emoji15] [emoji12]



The Gospel of Mark:


Note: This gospel is the oldest and supposedly the most original one in the New Testament!


"Although the book is anonymous, apart from the ancient heading "According to Mark" in manuscripts, it has traditionally been assigned to John Mark, in whose mother's house (at Jerusalem) Christians assembled. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1064)"

"Although there is no direct internal evidence of authorship, it was the unanimous testimony of the early church that this Gospel was written by John Mark. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1488)"

  • We certainly do not know whether Mark was the author or not! The quote clearly states "no direct internal evidence of authorship". Also, the so-called unanimous testimony of the early church:

    - Does not prove that the author was Mark.

    - Nor does it prove that other people did not alter and modify the book, especially when the book was written at least 40-50 years after Christ. We don't even know if Mark even wrote the book.


"Traditionally, the gospel is said to have been written shortly before A.D. 70 in Rome, at a time of impending persecution and when destruction loomed over Jerusalem. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1064)"

"Serious doubts exists as to whether these verses belong to the Gospel of Mark. They are absent from important early manuscripts and display certain peculiarities of vocabulary, style and theological content that are unlike the rest of Mark. His Gospel probably ended at 16:8, or its original ending has been lost. (From the NIV Bible Foot Notes [1], page 1528)"

"This verse, which reads, "But if you do not forgive, neither will your heavenly Father forgive your transgressions," is omitted in the best manuscripts. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1081)"

"This passage, termed the Longer Ending to the Marcan gospel by comparison with a much briefer conclusion found in some less important manuscripts, has traditionally been accepted as a canonical part of the gospel and was defined as such by the Council of Trent. Early citations of it by the Fathers indicate that it was composed by the second century, although vocabulary and style indicate that it was written by someone other than Mark. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1088)"

So, in reality, we don't really know whether Mark was the sole author of this Gospel or not, nor do we know when and where the "gospel" was even written.

And since The New Testament wasn't even documented on paper until 150-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to) after Jesus, then how are we to know for sure that the current "Gospel of Mark" wasn't written by some pro of Mark?


A new captured image of this book's corruption:






(Bible Gateway passage: Mark 16:9-20 - New International Version)


The above text reads: "The most reliable early manuscript and other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9-20."

Now my concern to this corruption and 'answer-the-problem-away' statement is that what are those so-called "reliable early manuscript(s)" and who are the "ancient witnesses"?

According to the early Christians' manuscripts, Jesus never got crucified, and trinity is a lie.

The so-called "gospel of Mark", along with all of the "gospels" of the NT, were written by third-party narration, as clearly demonstrated .

People wrote on the tongue of Jesus' Disciples those books.

They are neither original nor are the Pure Word of GOD Almighty.
 

Hapa ndio umezidi kujichimbia shimo kabisa.
Kuwa muwazi kijana.
Umar ibn Khatab ni zaid ya Allah aka Muhammad.
Kama unabisha bisha tu nawe uonekane umo.
Ilikuaje Allah(Muhammad) asijue kwamba mwanamke anatakiwa kuvaa hijab mpaka Umar aseme ndo aya inashuka?
ilikuaje Asijue kuwa Kaaba ni pazuri kuwa centre ya Ibada mpaka Umar aseme ndio Allah ateremshe Aya?
Ilikuaje ashindwe kuwashughulikia wake wa Mudy mpaka Umar awatishie kwamba mkiendelea kutomtii Mudy Allah ataleta wanawake wengine tena wazuri zaidi yao kwaajili ya Mudy. Ndipo iliposhuka aya ya karipio hilo?
Umar huyo huyo ndiye aliyemshauri Mudy kuwa kuwepo na Adhana( a call of prayer na atatakiwa Bilal Mtumwa(mtu Mweusi) wake Mudy ndio atakuwa anaipiga kisa alikuwa na sauti nzuri.

Kama ndivyo kweli iweje basi alipo ambiwa asome alijibu sijui kusoma. Na wakati huo huo mnajisifia kuwa ni miujiza ya Allah alimshushia kitabu mtu asiyejua kusoma na kuandika? na hii ilipelekea akabwe koo sijui mbavu mara 3(Nyote mnakubali)

Ukisema mtume alisomewa hiyo Quran na Jibril. Ili asisahau. Kulikuwa na haja gani amwambie Soma? wakati alichotakiwa ni kumsomea naye akariri kama wewe ulivyokaririshwa.
Kwenye hili Dogo umefeli. mtume alikuwa anasahau na kufikia wakati mwingine anaulizwa mbona jana ulisema hivi leo vile. ili kujificha na aibu akajifanya kuwa Allah alishusha quran in 7 letters( 7 Aruf) where are they) ili kila mtu aweze kuelewa.
Kibaya zaidi akazidi kujichanganya akaja na aya eti KILA MTUME ALITEREMSHWA/letwa kwa watu wake anaozungumza nao lugha moja ili wapate kuelewa. Iweje kwake ape 7 dialects ilhali ndugu zake wa kureish walizungumza lugha moja ya Kikureish yeye akapewa kiarabu? ndani ya Quran kuna maneno kibao ya Aramec(lugha ya kiyahudi) Kigiriki nk. Na tukiendelea kuyachambua maandiko tunakuta kuna maneno yameandikwa na hmjui maana yake isipokuwa allah. Sasa ya nini aliyashusha ikiwa hamjui anamaanisha nini? Abdul be serious!!

Kauli yako ya mwisho ndio inakuzika kabisaaaa.

QURAN 61:6
"Na Isa bin Mariam aliposema; Enyi wana wa Israeli ! Hakika mimi ni mtume Mwenyezi Mungu kwenu, ninaye thibitisha yaliyokuwa kabla yangu katika Taurati, na Mwenye kubashiri kuja mtume atakaye kuja baada yangu ,jina lake ni Ahmad(au Mohammad)

Ahahahahaahahaahaha hatuitaji biblia sana hata QURAN ilishatabiri ujio wa mtume wetu kipenzi kabisaa


Hivi nikuulize, ukishindwa kamuulize tena shekh wako. Usikimbilie kujibu tulizana tena kwa utuvu!
Maneno haya aliyasema nani, Muhammad au Allah? na yameandikwa kitabu kipi? Bibilia au Quran?
Utabiri huo unaweza kutuonyesha kwenye Bibilia umeandikwa kitabu gani? Mwanzo,Isaya, Kutoka, Mathayo, Luka, Ufunuo?

Abdul are you sure??

Pata kibwagizo hicho kwa jioni ya leo. Kikuvuruge zaidi na Abduls wenzako.

 
Wee nikujibu Mara ngapi kwamba kambishie allah tena kamrushie mate MIMI hayanihusugl [emoji15] [emoji12]



MZEE MZIMA WA KANISA KAVAA KILEMBA NA MSALABA WAKE HAJAUSAHAU KAUBANDIKA KWENYE KILEMBA 😛😛😛😛😛😛YUKO ANAONGOZWA NA ROHO MTAKATIFU WAKE 😛😛😛😛😛😛

 



 




 
Teja la mivutu [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]

The Gospel of Luke:

"The identification of Luke as the author is primarily based on the "we" passages in Acts (beginning in Acts 16:10), which indicate that Luke was associated with Paul in his ministry and wrote down the account of his activities. (The Amplified Bible, Page 1153)"

The only proof that they have about Luke being the sole author of this gospel is a weak speculation on "we". This is absurd at best! This speculation shows:

  1. The gospel was likely to have been altered or written by others beside Luke.
  2. It's place of documentation is unknown.
  3. It's date of documentation is also unknown.

It is also worth mentioning that the author of the book of Acts is also unknown as shown above:

"Although the author does not name himself, evidence outside the Scriptures and inferences from the book itself lead to the conclusion that the author was Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1643)"
 
Teja la mivutu [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38]


So their whole speculation is absurd at best!



There is a serious forgery about Jesus' "resurrection on the third day" claiming that it was foretold in the OT when it wasn't! Let us look at Luke 24:44-48 from the NIV Bible:

Luke 24

44 He said to them, "This is what I told you while I was still with you: Everything must be fulfilled that is written about me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets and the Psalms."
45 Then he opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.
46 He told them, "This is what is written: The Christ will suffer and rise from the dead on the third day,
47 and repentance and forgiveness of sins will be preached in his name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
48 You are witnesses of these things.

Luke 24:44-48 says that it is written in the Law of Moses (i.e., the Torah) that Jesus will die and resurrect on the third day. Where in the entire Old Testament (not just in the 5 books of Moses that make up the Law of Moses or the Torah) do you have that?! Show me one Old Testament verse that prophesized about Jesus' third day resurrection?

Please visit: A serious forgery in Luke 24:44-48 about Jesus' "resurrection on the third day" claiming that it was foretold in the OT when it wasn't!

In fact, in my article Answering Isaiah 53, I clearly proved that the Old Testament actually confirms the Noble Quran's claims about Jesus never got crucified! Let alone dying and resurrecting on the third day!

Anyway, Let us see what the NIV Bible's theologians said about this book:

"The author's name does not appear in the book, but much unmistakable evidence points to Luke. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1529)"

Again, we don't know for sure whether it was Luke or not who wrote the "Gospel of Luke" since his name doesn't appear in the Book. The Gospel itself seems to be a compromising one to the Word of GOD. Let us look at the following:

"Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, (Luke 1:3)"

Few problems with this Gospel from the quote above:

1- The author was not inspired, and knew for sure that he was not inspired by GOD Almighty to write the Book since he didn't mention about any divine inspiration, and he said "...since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning..." Where do we see GOD's inspiration in this?

2- The author wrote it for the purpose of "his most excellent Theophilus." Since when we compromise GOD Almighty and document His Holy Words for the purpose of other higher (in rank) human beings?

I say it again, I hope you see the real danger in making these assumptions when you are willing to DIE for the fact that such Gospel is the actual True Word of GOD Almighty!

Also, beside, what evidence are they talking about?!

The New Testament wasn't even documented on paper until 150-300 years (depending on what Christian you talk to) after Jesus.

So unless the Book/Gospel was signed by its author, there is no way we would know for sure that it was indeed his book from the first place, let alone considering as the True Living Word of GOD.
 
A Donkey will remain a Donkey not the otherwise.
The same Idiot Deedat gave you those proof that, Bible is fully of porno verses. I told you before eg. Songs of Solomon. few years later he came back and say he made a big discovery that, Muhammad is mentioned by name in Bible with ref. Same Songs of Solomon( Mahammadeeeeeem). And because you are the C&P idiot Donkeys you believed him and shouting Taqbirrrrrrrrrrrrr!
Shame on you.
Nilijua utakuja huko huko ujikaange mwenyewe. Punguzeni kula tende na kunywa mkojo wa ngamia!
 
MZEE MZIMA WA KANISA KAVAA KILEMBA NA MSALABA WAKE HAJAUSAHAU KAUBANDIKA KWENYE KILEMBA 😛😛😛😛😛😛YUKO ANAONGOZWA NA ROHO MTAKATIFU WAKE 😛😛😛😛😛😛

View attachment 900054
Mbona huu mchoro ni wa Mudy(child molester) alipokuwa akimmendea Aisha. Mother of the stupid Abduls.
check below Hadithi and tell the readers here who is this cartoon belong to?
Sunan Ibn Majah » The Chapters on Marriage

It was narrated that 'Aishah said:
"I used to play with dolls when I was with the Messenger of Allah, and he used to bring my friends to me to playwith me."

حَدَّثَنَا حَفْصُ بْنُ عَمْرٍو، حَدَّثَنَا عُمَرُ بْنُ حَبِيبٍ الْقَاضِي، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا هِشَامُ بْنُ عُرْوَةَ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ، قَالَتْ كُنْتُ أَلْعَبُ بِالْبَنَاتِ وَأَنَا عِنْدَ، رَسُولِ اللَّهِ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ فَكَانَ يُسَرِّبُ إِلَىَّ صَوَاحِبَاتِي يُلاَعِبْنَنِي ‏.‏



Sahih al-Bukhari » Good Manners and Form (Al-Adab)

Narrated `Aisha:
I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah's Apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dollsand similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for `Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fath-ul-Bari page 143, Vol.13)

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدٌ، أَخْبَرَنَا أَبُو مُعَاوِيَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا هِشَامٌ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ ـ رضى الله عنها ـ قَالَتْ كُنْتُ أَلْعَبُ بِالْبَنَاتِ عِنْدَ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم وَكَانَ لِي صَوَاحِبُ يَلْعَبْنَ مَعِي، فَكَانَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم إِذَا دَخَلَ يَتَقَمَّعْنَ مِنْهُ، فَيُسَرِّبُهُنَّ إِلَىَّ فَيَلْعَبْنَ مَعِي‏.‏



Al-Adab Al-Mufrad » Children

'A'isha said, "I used to play with dolls in the presence of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, and my friends would play with me. When the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, entered, they would hide from him and he would call them to join me and they would play with me."

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ سَلامٍ، قَالَ‏:‏ حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ خَازِمٍ، قَالَ‏:‏ حَدَّثَنَا هِشَامُ بْنُ عُرْوَةَ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ قَالَتْ‏:‏ كُنْتُ أَلْعَبُ بِالْبَنَاتِ عِنْدَ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم، وَكَانَ لِي صَوَاحِبُ يَلْعَبْنَ مَعِي، فَكَانَ رَسُولُ اللهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم إِذَا دَخَلَ يَنْقَمِعْنَ مِنْهُ، فَيُسَرِّبُهُنَّ إِلَيَّ، فَيَلْعَبْنَ مَعِي‏.‏
 

Mkuu, Jibu sahihi la swali juu ya Jua kuzama matopeni hawana na hawajui.
Kwa faida ya wote wanaotaka kujadili hili swali. Please take time and listen to this debate, hope you will learn a lot from it. Hasa majibu ya Muslim Abduls na style yao ya kurukaruka kama tumbili.
Hiki ndicho kilichotokea kwenye mjadala huu. hawana majibu wanakuja na articles za false Jesus pictures.
Ila wanashindwa kutwambia why Jesus is miraculous BORN a virgin. Why there is an Ant-Christ and not Ant-Muhammad? Why Jesus Christ will return for the second time and not Muhammad?
All these stories are found in Muhammad's Yellow Page, so called quran.

 


WACHA MAMBO YAKO YA VISODA


 


ZAWADI YAKO HII


 


KUMBE HATA KILICHOONGELEWA HUKIJUI , Jaziba imekuzidi , ni wapi uliambiwa biblia yote ni pornografia??

Umeambiwa Pornography IN the BIBLE ??? Hata akili zimekuruka kwa kushughulikiwa na Maaskofu wanajivalisha VILEMBA

MZEE MZIMA WA KANISA KAVAA KILEMBA NA MSALABA WAKE KAUBANDIKA KWENYE KILEMBA YUKO ANAONGOZWA NA ROHO MTAKATIFU WAKE 😛😛😛😛😛😛


 

Unaweka picha bila kumtambulisha [emoji12] mmezoea ku-edit eeh [emoji53] mpe heshima yake baba yake fatuma [emoji38] [emoji117] kayataka mwenyewe kwa Raha na uchu wake [emoji4] au ulimtuma wewe [emoji15] ingekuwa zama hizi segelea ingemuhusu na mtume mngemkosa [emoji53]
 
Kwanza majibu yamekupata barabara ndio maana unabaki kulalamika umeuliza Omar ni nani? Jibu ni moja tu ni swahaba wa Mtume Mohammad S.A.W , hayo mengine ni malalamiko yako yasiyo na msingi wala dalili yeyote kwasababu unachofanya ni kuunga unga tu , wakati wewe unaunga unga sisi tunakupa majibu Mujaraba kabisa , labda cha kukusaidia ili huo ujinga wako ukutoke sio kwenye QURAN wala SUNA , hata gazeti la shigongo ukileta Nukuu moja tu inayosema Omari ni mtume kesho utanikuta kanisani kwenu ? ahahahhahahahahh halafu kuhusu Kumuona au kutokumuona Mohammad kwenye Vitabu vilivyopita labda nikufahamishe kitu kimoja kama mwandishi anaamua kwa makusudi kuacha mambo aliyoyafanya Yesu na asiyaingize kwenye kitabu itakuwa ajabu gani kufuta na kuondoa kabisa jina la Mohammad
YOHANA 20:30
";Basi kuna ishara nyingine nyingi alizozifanya Yesu mbele ya wanafunzi wake ZISIZOANDIKWA katika kitabu hiki"

hivyo tunafahamu kuna huaribifu mkubwa kwenye maandiko hayo wala ilo halina mjadala ndio maana kuna udanganyifu mkubwa hata kwenye takwimu za kibiblia kwahiyo tatizo sio Mungu ni waandishi wenu
POKEA hiyo UONGO kwenye BIBLIA UMEINGIZWA MWINGI
MFANO hata WATOTO wa ZATU waliorudi utumwani toka babiloni hamuwajui mmebaki kukisia tu
EZRA 2:8
"Wana wa ZATU , mia kenda arobaini na watano"(945)
NEHEMIA 7:13
"Wana wa ZATU, mia nane arobaini na watano"(845)
Ahahhahhhhahahhahahahajajha SARAKASI ni nyingi humo kwenye na ndio maana imetajwa INJILI na sio injili ya MATAYO wala injili ya MARKO
kwahiyo tunafahamu taurati ya kweli na injili ya kweli ambayo haijachezewa bila shaka habari za nabii zipo , ndio maana hata INJILI YA BARNABA amuitaki kwasababu mnajua Mtume katajwa kule na huku mmefuta , mnaishia kutoa sababu za kitoto , eti katunga mwarabu
 
Wee nikujibu Mara ngapi kwamba kambishie allah tena kamrushie mate MIMI hayanihusugl [emoji15] [emoji12]
Allah na wagalatia wapi na wapi? Ahhhahahahaahhaahahahahhhaha hata huyo mwalimu wa wagalatia aliemtukana Mungu mpumbavu wala hamuitaji ahahahaaaaahahahahahahahahah
WAKORINTHO wa kwanza 1:25
"Kwasababu UPUMBAVU wa Mungu, una hekima zaidi ya wanadamu, na UDHAIFU wa Mungu una nguvu zaidi ya wanadamu"

Ahahahahaahahaahaha huyu ndio kaleta hadi WAKORINTHO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…