Mtume Muhammad: Jamii isipotoshwe; Jua huzama katika Chemchemu ya matope Meusi na Mazito

[mugah di matheo]

Viva mudy viva

 

[Kanungila Karim]

Viva mudy viva

Hahahaa

 

[mgen]

Ahahahahaahahaahaha unatia huruma kabisaaaaaaaaa , wanakuwa mwili mmoja kwenye namna gani? lazima uonyeshe lakini linapokuja suala la maamuzi na uangalizi liko wazi Mume ndio MTAWALA ( first in command) yaani hata hili pia tukuelimishe bureeeeee kabisaa wewe ahhhahaaaajajaaj

Kwani sio mwili MMOJA [emoji350] Hii ilimu ghaibu kwako wewe mzee WA kukariri usie na ilimu ya Roho hapo ndipo tunaona mapungufu ya wewe masudi kuikosa Ilimu hiyo [emoji4]

 

[Gavana]

Sasa ukitaka Timotheo asemeje ktk HALI YA UBINADAMU KAMILI WA YESU [emoji350] [emoji344] Timotheo ni Msomi na MchaMungu [emoji123] [emoji106]

Are these Paul's words or GOD Almighty's Divine Revelations????


Christian theologians have created the lie and myth about the Bible being GOD Almighty's Divine Words. Let us see just how true this bogus claim is:

The following verses were sent to me by brother Haytham, may Allah Almighty always be pleased with him.

2 Timothy 4:9-13

9 Do your best to come to me quickly,

10 for Demas, because he loved this world, has deserted me and has gone to Thessalonica. Crescens has gone to Galatia, and Titus to Dalmatia.

11 Only Luke is with me. Get Mark and bring him with you, because he is helpful to me in my ministry.

12 I sent Tychicus to Ephesus.

13 When you come, bring the cloak that I left with Carpus at Troas, and my scrolls, especially the parchments.


Titus 3:12-14

12 As soon as I send Artemas or Tychicus to you, do your best to come to me at Nicopolis, because I have decided to winter there.

13 Do everything you can to help Zenas the lawyer and Apollos on their way and see that they have everything they need.

14 Our people must learn to devote themselves to doing what is good, in order that they may provide for daily necessities and not live unproductive lives.


He decided to winter there???


Are these Paul's own opinions and commands or are they truly GOD Almighty's UNCOMPROMISED Divine Revelations:

1 Timothy 2:11-15

11 A woman should learn in quietness and full submission.

12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.

13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve.

14 And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner.

15 But women[a] will be saved through childbearing–if they continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety.


1 Corinthians 14:34

34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.


I think the nationally-known Church Minister, Mrs. Joyce Meyer, should resign and repent according to uncle Paul.


So, were the above truly Paul's opinions or GOD Almighty's Divine Commands?

If the Bible is truly GOD Almighty's UNCOMPROMISED Revelations, then why do we have Paul's personal nonsense in the book???​

How can any sane person then say that the Bible is ALL GOD Almighty's Divine Revelations and is error-free?​

 

[Gavana]

Hekima ya MUNGU kuuvaa mwili WA kibinadamu ILI kutufundisha yeye Mwenyewe wewe masudi unaona kafanya upumbavu [emoji15] HIVYO wewe masudi and the like ni wapumbavu na sio MUNGU! Prof Paulo alikusudia kihivyo [emoji117] Sasa wasio jua kusoma wanashughulika na uongo, pia uzushi [emoji117] View attachment 912474 [emoji38] [emoji38]

Paul's blasphemous statement:


Let us read what Paul said in the corrupted Bible:


"For the foolishness of God is wiser than man's wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than man's strength. (From the NIV Bible, 1 Corinthians 1:25)"


Here are the countless English translations of this verse. Literally, almost 100% of all of the English translations agree:

1. Corinthians 1:25 (New International Version)
   25 For the foolishness of God is wiser than man's wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than man's strength.
2. 1 Corinthians 1:25 (New American Standard Bible)
   25 Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
3. 1 Corinthians 1:25 (Amplified Bible)
   25[This is] because the foolish thing [that has its source in] God is wiser than men, and the weak thing [that springs] from God is stronger than men.
   
   Because the stupid thing in GOD???
   
4. 1 Corinthians 1:25 (New Living Translation)
   25 This foolish plan of God is wiser than the wisest of human plans, and God’s weakness is stronger than the greatest of human strength.
5. 1 Corinthians 1:25 (King James Version)
   25 Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
6. 1 Corinthians 1:25 (English Standard Version)
   25 For the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
7. 1 Corinthians 1:25 (Contemporary English Version)
   25 Even when God is foolish, he is wiser than everyone else, and even when God is weak, he is stronger than everyone else.
   
   Even when GOD is stupid???
8. 1 Corinthians 1:25 (New King James Version)
   25 Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
9. 1 Corinthians 1:25 (21st Century King James Version)
   25 For the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
10. 1 Corinthians 1:25 (American Standard Version)
    25 Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
11. 1 Corinthians 1:25 (Young's Literal Translation)
    25 because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men;
12. 1 Corinthians 1:25 (Darby Translation)
    25 Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
13. 1 Corinthians 1:25 (Holman Christian Standard Bible)
    25 because God's foolishness is wiser than human wisdom, and God's weakness is stronger than human strength.
14. 1 Corinthians 1:25 (New International Reader's Version)
    25 The foolish things of God are wiser than human wisdom. The weakness of God is stronger than human strength.
    
    The stupid things of GOD???
15. 1 Corinthians 1:25 (Wycliffe New Testament)
    25 For that that is folly thing of God, is wiser than men; and that that is the feeble thing of God [and that that is the
    sick thing, or frail, of God], is stronger than men.
    
    The folly things of GOD???
16. 1 Corinthians 1:25 (New International Version - UK)
    25 For the foolishness of God is wiser than man's wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than man's strength.
17. 1 Corinthians 1:25 (Today's New International Version)
    25 For the foolishness of God is wiser than human wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than human strength.

Let us analyze this foolish and blasphemous verse from Paul:


1- Regardless of how smart and stupid GOD and us humans are, our intelligence will never reach even the stupidity of GOD!


2- GOD is a fool.


3- GOD is weak.


4- Man is more foolish and weaker than GOD.


5- The comparison itself is very insulting and degrading to GOD Almighty. It is also limiting to Him since our finite and limited intelligence and strength were compared to His infinite Attributes.

 

[mgen]

Pope Francis cancels the Bible and proposes to create a new book

utasubiri sana kuona KANISA KATOLIKI USHARIKA WA WATAKATIFU MAONDOLEO YA DHAMBU UFUFUKO WA MIILI NA UZIMA WA MILELE lifiiye [emoji12] itakuwa kama fisi akifuatia mkono udondoke aule [emoji15] [emoji12]

 

[Gavana]

Sasa ukitaka Timotheo asemeje ktk HALI YA UBINADAMU KAMILI WA YESU [emoji350] [emoji344] Timotheo ni Msomi na MchaMungu [emoji123] [emoji106]

Paul did clearly insult GOD Almighty, and I challenge any polytheist trinitarian pagan to disprove it!​

GOD Almighty in the Old Testament punishes to death those who curse His Holy Name:


Let us look at the following verses from the Bible's Old Testament:


Leviticus 24:16

anyone who blasphemes the name of the LORD must be put to death. The entire assembly must stone him. Whether an alien or native-born, when he blasphemes the Name, he must be put to death.

Leviticus 22:32

Do not profane my holy name. I must be acknowledged as holy by the Israelites. I am the LORD, who makes you holy

Yet, Paul said that GOD Almighty is a fool and weak! If cursing GOD Almighty's Holy Name even in the absolute least was not big deal to GOD Almighty in the Bible, then GOD Almighty would not have ordered the killing of those who profane His Holy Name.

Paul clearly violated that Law in the Bible by calling GOD Almighty a fool and weak.

 

[Gavana]

utasubiri sana kuona KANISA KATOLIKI USHARIKA WA WATAKATIFU MAONDOLEO YA DHAMBU UFUFUKO WA MIILI NA UZIMA WA MILELE lifiiye [emoji12] itakuwa kama fisi akifuatia mkono udondoke aule [emoji15] [emoji12]

THE hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church has published a teaching document instructing the faithful that some parts of the Bible are not actually true.

The Catholic bishops of England, Wales and Scotland are warning their five million worshippers, as well as any others drawn to the study of scripture, that they should not expect “total accuracy” from the Bible.

“We should not expect to find in Scripture full scientific accuracy or complete historical precision,” they say in The Gift of Scripture.

The document is timely, coming as it does amid the rise of the religious Right, in particular in the US.

Some Christians want a literal interpretation of the story of creation, as told in Genesis, taught alongside Darwin’s theory of evolution in schools, believing “intelligent design” to be an equally plausible theory of how the world began.

But the first 11 chapters of Genesis, in which two different and at times conflicting stories of creation are told, are among those that this country’s Catholic bishops insist cannot be “historical”. At most, they say, they may contain “historical traces”.

The document shows how far the Catholic Church has come since the 17th century, when Galileo was condemned as a heretic for flouting a near-universal belief in the divine inspiration of the Bible by advocating the Copernican view of the solar system. Only a century ago, Pope Pius X condemned Modernist Catholic scholars who adapted historical-critical methods of analysing ancient literature to the Bible.

In the document, the bishops acknowledge their debt to biblical scholars. They say the Bible must be approached in the knowledge that it is “God’s word expressed in human language” and that proper acknowledgement should be given both to the word of God and its human dimensions.

They say the Church must offer the gospel in ways “appropriate to changing times, intelligible and attractive to our contemporaries”.

The Bible is true in passages relating to human salvation, they say, but continue: “We should not expect total accuracy from the Bible in other, secular matters.”

They go on to condemn fundamentalism for its “intransigent intolerance” and to warn of “significant dangers” involved in a fundamentalist approach.

“Such an approach is dangerous, for example, when people of one nation or group see in the Bible a mandate for their own superiority, and even consider themselves permitted by the Bible to use violence against others.”

Of the notorious anti-Jewish curse in Matthew 27:25, “His blood be on us and on our children”, a passage used to justify centuries of anti-Semitism, the bishops say these and other words must never be used again as a pretext to treat Jewish people with contempt.

Describing this passage as an example of dramatic exaggeration, the bishops say they have had “tragic consequences” in encouraging hatred and persecution. “The attitudes and language of first-century quarrels between Jews and Jewish Christians should never again be emulated in relations between Jews and Christians.”

As examples of passages not to be taken literally, the bishops cite the early chapters of Genesis, comparing them with early creation legends from other cultures, especially from the ancient East. The bishops say it is clear that the primary purpose of these chapters was to provide religious teaching and that they could not be described as historical writing.

Similarly, they refute the apocalyptic prophecies of Revelation, the last book of the Christian Bible, in which the writer describes the work of the risen Jesus, the death of the Beast and the wedding feast of Christ the Lamb.

The bishops say: “Such symbolic language must be respected for what it is, and is not to be interpreted literally. We should not expect to discover in this book details about the end of the world, about how many will be saved and about when the end will come.”

In their foreword to the teaching document, the two most senior Catholics of the land, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, Archbishop of Westminster, and Cardinal Keith O’Brien, Archbishop of St Andrew’s and Edinburgh, explain its context.

They say people today are searching for what is worthwhile, what has real value, what can be trusted and what is really true.
The new teaching has been issued as part of the 40th anniversary celebrations of Dei Verbum, the Second Vatican Council document explaining the place of Scripture in revelation. In the past 40 years, Catholics have learnt more than ever before to cherish the Bible. “We have rediscovered the Bible as a precious treasure, both ancient and ever new.”

A Christian charity is sending a film about the Christmas story to every primary school in Britain after hearing of a young boy who asked his teacher why Mary and Joseph had named their baby after a swear word. The Breakout Trust raised £200,000 to make the 30-minute animated film, It’s a Boy. Steve Legg, head of the charity, said: “There are over 12 million children in the UK and only 756,000 of them go to church regularly.

That leaves a staggering number who are probably not receiving basic Christian teaching.”

 

[makilo]

Nimesoma sijaona hoja yenye mashiko,kupangua hoja uliyotaka kuipangua.kwahiyo mudi hakusema hayo maneno? Na hayajaandikwa kwenye kitabu tukufu?

 

[mgen]

THE hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church has published a teaching document instructing the faithful that some parts of the Bible are not actually true.

The Catholic bishops of England, Wales and Scotland are warning their five million worshippers, as well as any others drawn to the study of scripture, that they should not expect “total accuracy” from the Bible.

“We should not expect to find in Scripture full scientific accuracy or complete historical precision,” they say in The Gift of Scripture.

The document is timely, coming as it does amid the rise of the religious Right, in particular in the US.

Some Christians want a literal interpretation of the story of creation, as told in Genesis, taught alongside Darwin’s theory of evolution in schools, believing “intelligent design” to be an equally plausible theory of how the world began.

But the first 11 chapters of Genesis, in which two different and at times conflicting stories of creation are told, are among those that this country’s Catholic bishops insist cannot be “historical”. At most, they say, they may contain “historical traces”.

The document shows how far the Catholic Church has come since the 17th century, when Galileo was condemned as a heretic for flouting a near-universal belief in the divine inspiration of the Bible by advocating the Copernican view of the solar system. Only a century ago, Pope Pius X condemned Modernist Catholic scholars who adapted historical-critical methods of analysing ancient literature to the Bible.

In the document, the bishops acknowledge their debt to biblical scholars. They say the Bible must be approached in the knowledge that it is “God’s word expressed in human language” and that proper acknowledgement should be given both to the word of God and its human dimensions.

They say the Church must offer the gospel in ways “appropriate to changing times, intelligible and attractive to our contemporaries”.

The Bible is true in passages relating to human salvation, they say, but continue: “We should not expect total accuracy from the Bible in other, secular matters.”

They go on to condemn fundamentalism for its “intransigent intolerance” and to warn of “significant dangers” involved in a fundamentalist approach.

“Such an approach is dangerous, for example, when people of one nation or group see in the Bible a mandate for their own superiority, and even consider themselves permitted by the Bible to use violence against others.”

Of the notorious anti-Jewish curse in Matthew 27:25, “His blood be on us and on our children”, a passage used to justify centuries of anti-Semitism, the bishops say these and other words must never be used again as a pretext to treat Jewish people with contempt.

Describing this passage as an example of dramatic exaggeration, the bishops say they have had “tragic consequences” in encouraging hatred and persecution. “The attitudes and language of first-century quarrels between Jews and Jewish Christians should never again be emulated in relations between Jews and Christians.”

As examples of passages not to be taken literally, the bishops cite the early chapters of Genesis, comparing them with early creation legends from other cultures, especially from the ancient East. The bishops say it is clear that the primary purpose of these chapters was to provide religious teaching and that they could not be described as historical writing.

Similarly, they refute the apocalyptic prophecies of Revelation, the last book of the Christian Bible, in which the writer describes the work of the risen Jesus, the death of the Beast and the wedding feast of Christ the Lamb.

The bishops say: “Such symbolic language must be respected for what it is, and is not to be interpreted literally. We should not expect to discover in this book details about the end of the world, about how many will be saved and about when the end will come.”

In their foreword to the teaching document, the two most senior Catholics of the land, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, Archbishop of Westminster, and Cardinal Keith O’Brien, Archbishop of St Andrew’s and Edinburgh, explain its context.

They say people today are searching for what is worthwhile, what has real value, what can be trusted and what is really true.
The new teaching has been issued as part of the 40th anniversary celebrations of Dei Verbum, the Second Vatican Council document explaining the place of Scripture in revelation. In the past 40 years, Catholics have learnt more than ever before to cherish the Bible. “We have rediscovered the Bible as a precious treasure, both ancient and ever new.”

A Christian charity is sending a film about the Christmas story to every primary school in Britain after hearing of a young boy who asked his teacher why Mary and Joseph had named their baby after a swear word. The Breakout Trust raised £200,000 to make the 30-minute animated film, It’s a Boy. Steve Legg, head of the charity, said: “There are over 12 million children in the UK and only 756,000 of them go to church regularly.

That leaves a staggering number who are probably not receiving basic Christian teaching.”

It's quality not quantity [emoji106]

 

[The Boldly]

Kiukweli sijasoma....

 

[Scars]

Inamaana hapo MO hakuwazuga wafuasi wake?

 

[bobefu zoefu]

Hahahahaha kwani na yeye ana ubiliobea

Inamaana hapo MO hakuwazuga wafuasi wake?

 

[mjingamimi]

Naona wafuasi wa bachela sugu.mkimkosoa muhammad.

 

[mgen]

What exactly does the author mean by the statement "Whoever in these times, in the discussion of the literary phenomena of the Hexateuch appeals to the ignorance or prejudice of the multitude as if they were any peril to faith in these processes of Higher Criticism, risks his reputation for scholarship by so doing" ?

Well, he is referring to the practices of men who have a regrettable formula for selling their books which is based upon backing the reader into a corner and then giving them only one way to save their faith.

For example, they would say words to the effect "Either the Bible is 100% the inspired, unchanged, and undisputed word of God or else it is the greatest hoax ever foisted upon mankind from the beginning of time." Such authors only allow their readers to accept one extreme or the other.

In effect, they are telling their readers "either you accept every word and every syllable as undying inspired truth or else renounce Jesus and become a pagan."


However, the truth lies at neither extreme. Allah Almighty tells us in the Qur'an:


"O people of the book! Do not go to extremes in your religion: nor say of Allah aught but the truth. (The Noble Quran, 4:171)"


The fact that we recognize that mankind has tampered with the Bible does not mean that God, at one point in time, did not send down a revelation upon prophet Moses, or that He did not send down a revelation upon prophet Jesus (peace be upon them both). It only means that "thou shalt love the Lord thy God … with all thy mind, …" Mark 12:30.

The fact that we wish to sift out the words of man from the book of God and only follow the words of God is not by any stretch of the imagination an abandonment of God or Jesus.

Quite the contrary, anyone who is not willing to do their utmost in protecting the words of God from the tampering fingers of mankind has indeed forsaken the very first commandment of God.


"For almost two millennia the Pentateuch was attributed to Moses as author by both Jewish and Christian tradition. Although significant questions about his authorship were raised along the way, it was not until the eighteenth century that the question was seriously broached.

Today, it is commonplace that he did not write the Pentateuch, but as we shall see the formation of these books is still shrouded in mystery."

The different "Canons" of the Bible!​

Different and conflicting variations of "gospels" and "books" that are disagreed upon by the Churches today.​

After this, it was noticed that in the beginning verses of the OT manuscripts, Deuteronomy says: "These are the words that Moses spoke to the children of Israel across the Jordan...."

They noticed that the words "across the Jordan" refers to people who are on the opposite side of the Jordan river to the author. But the alleged author, Moses himself, was never supposed to have been in Israel in his life.


It was also noticed that Moses speaks in detail in Deuteronomy 34:5-10 about how he died and where he was buried.

Moses also calls himself the most humble man on earth in Numbers 12:3 (would the most humble man on earth call himself the most humble man on earth?).

In Deuteronomy 34:10 we read "And there arose not a prophet since in Israel like unto Moses." This also implies that the author was looking back at Moses through history a long time after Moses's death. Now the flood gates were opened and countless other discrepancies began to show up.


In the beginning, it was claimed that Moses wrote the Pentateuch (Five "books of Moses") and anyone contesting this fact would be severely punished or worse.

However, when these matters started to become well known, it became necessary to find explanations.

For example, the first explanation presented for the verses referring to the death of Moses was that Moses had written his books, but that later prophets, as well as "inspired" scribes (who could also be considered prophets), had later on added on a couple of lines here and there. In this manner the text remained 100% the "inspiration" of God.

This explanation, however, did not stand up to scrutiny because the style and literary characteristics of the verses are the same throughout. For instance, the verses which describe the death and burial of Moses exhibit the same literary characteristics as the verses before and after them.


After this, the trend became to explain any and all discrepancies through abstraction and elaborate interpretations, or through the introduction of additional narrative details that did not appear in the biblical text.

Around this time, a startling new discovery was made. It was noticed that the stories in the five books of Moses were made up of doublets. A doublet is a case of one story being told twice. Even in the English translation of the Bible, the doublets are noticeable. These doublets have been masterfully intertwined so that they become one narrative.


For example, there are doublets of the creation of the world, the covenant between God and Abraham, the naming of Isaac, Abraham's claim that his wife Sarah was his sister, the story of Jacob's journey to Mesopotamia, Jacob's revelation at Beth-El,...etc. In many cases these doublets actually contradict one another.

The apologists once again jumped up with an explanation in hand. They claimed that the doublets were complementary and not contradictory. It was claimed that they came to teach us a lesson by their "apparent" contradiction.

However, this claim did not hold water for long. The reason is that not long after, it was discovered that when the doublets were separated into two separate accounts, each account was almost always consistent about the name of the deity that it used.

One would always refer to God as Yahweh/Jehovah. This document was called "J." The other always referred to Him as Elohiym(God). It was called "E." There were various other literary characteristics which were then found to be common to one group or the other. It became obvious that someone had taken two separate accounts of the ministry of Moses , cut them up, and then woven them together quite masterfully so that their actions would not be discovered until countless centuries later.


Once this startling discovery was made, the Old Testament was once again placed under the scrutiny of scholars and it was discovered that the Pentateuch was not made up of two major source documents but FOUR.

It was discovered that some stories were not only doublets, but triplets. Additional literary characteristics were identified for these documents. The third source was called P (for Priestly), and the fourth D (for Deuteronomy).

In the end it was concluded that the first four "books of Moses" were the result of the merging of three separate accounts which were called J, E, and P, and the book of Deuteronomy was found to be a separate account which was called D. The person (or persons) who collected and intertwined these sources was called "The Redactor."


"D (DEUTERONOMIST). The designation of one of the principle literary sources or strata of the PENTATEUCH. The Deuteronomist was the editor or compiler of this source, which is roughly coextensive with the book of Deuteronomy"


The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, Abingdon Press, Vol. 1, p. 756


"E (ELOHIST). One of the principle narrative sources or strata of the PENTATEUCH. The term is derived from a Hebrew word for 'God' ... the use of which is characteristic of this source"


The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, Abingdon Press, Vol. 2, p. 1


"J. One of the principle narrative sources or strata of the PENTATEUCH. The symbol is derived from the personal name of God, Jehovah ... the use of which is characteristic of this source. It is commonly regarded as Judahite in origin, and somewhat earlier than E (tenth-ninth centuries B.C.)"


The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, Abingdon Press, Vol. 2, p. 777


"P. The designation of the so-called Priestly source of the PENTATEUCH. To this source are assigned most of the liturgical, genealogical, legal, and technical materials, connected by a bare minimum of narrative. The Priestly narrative is usually dated after the captivity, in the sixth or fifth century B.C."


The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, Abingdon Press, Vol. 3, p. 617


"The critical analysis of the Hexateuch [the five 'books of Moses' plus the book of Joshua] is the result of more than a century of profound study of the documents by the greatest critics of the age.

There has been a steady advance until the present position of agreement has been reached, in which Jew and Christian, Roman Catholic and Protestant, Rationalistic and Evangelical scholars, Reformed and Lutheran, Presbyterian and Episcopal, Unitarian, Methodist, and Baptist all concur.

The analysis of the Hexateuch into several distinct original documents is a purely literary question in which no article of faith is involved. Whoever in these times, in the discussion of the literary phenomena of the Hexateuch appeals to the ignorance or prejudice of the multitude as if they were any peril to faith in these processes of Higher Criticism, risks his reputation for scholarship by so doing.

There are no Hebrew professors on the continent of Europe, so far as I know, who deny the literary analysis of the Pentateuch into the four great documents"


source : Who wrote the Bible, Washington Gladden, Boston: Houghton, pp. 57-58

Did mankind tamper with the Old Testament?


"And it came to pass, when Moses had made an end of writing the words of this law in a book, until they were finished, That Moses commanded the Levites(Jews), which bare the ark of the covenant of the LORD, saying, Take this book of the law, and put it in the side of the ark of the covenant of the LORD your God, that it may be there for a witness against thee. For I know thy rebellion, and thy stiff neck: behold, while I am yet alive with you this day, ye have been rebellious against the LORD; and how much more after my death? Gather unto me all the elders of your tribes, and your officers, that I may speak these words in their ears, and call heaven and earth to record against them. For I know that after my death ye will become utterly corrupt, and turn aside from the way which I have commanded you; and evil will befall you in the latter days; because ye will do evil in the sight of the LORD, to provoke him to anger through the work of your hands. (Deuteronomy 31:25-29)"

Here the Jews' hands are predicted to cause so much corruption (including corruption in the Bible).

Jeremiah 8:8 below which came approximately 826 later confirmed the Bible corruption.

"How can you say we (the Jews) are wise and the law of the Lord is with us, when in fact the false pen of the scribes has made it into a lie? (Jeremiah 8:8 (Revised Standard Version))"


"And because of their (the Jews) breaking their covenant, We have cursed them and made hard their hearts. They change words from their places and have abandoned a good part of the message that was sent to them. And you will not cease to discover deceit in them, except a few of them. But forgive them and overlook (their misdeed). Verily! Allah loves the kindly. (The Noble Quran, 5:13)"


"O Messenger!(Muhammad) Do not be grieved by those who vie with one another in the race to disbelief, of such as say with their mouths: "We believe" but their hearts believe not, and of the Jews: of them are those who listen eagerly to lies -listener to others who have not come to you. They change the words from their places; they say: If you are given this then take it, but if you are not given this then beware! He whom Allah dooms unto sin, you (by your efforts) will avail him naught against Allah. Those are they for whom the will of Allah is that He cleanse not their hearts; for them there is a disgrace in this world, and in the Hereafter a great torment. (The Noble Quran, 5:41)"


For countless ages, the only book of history available to Christians and Jews was the Old Testament. When someone wanted to know what happened in the past, they would go back and study the Old Testament to find the answer. New theories about history literally lived and died by their conformance to what the Old Testament taught. Then the discrepancies began to be noticed.


Once mankind began to study the Old Testament in detail, comparing the various passages which referred to the same topic in order to obtain as much detail as possible, they began to notice conflicting accounts of many matters as well as other problems.

For instance, in the eleventh century, it was noticed that the list of Edomite kings in Genesis 36 names kings who lived long after Moses was dead Then people began to notice such statements as "to this day" something is true, which implies that the author was looking back at these matters through history and has seen that they have endured.

Kwanza fahamu hili


GOD Almighty in Islam and the Bible:


Did you know that Elohim is Allah [1] [2]. The "im" in Hebrew is a majestic plural for GOD Almighty. The root Word is "Eloh". And the more original Jews such as Yemenites and others say Alohim or Alah-im. And when you yourself pronounce it, you do naturally pronounce it with a double "l": Allah. Jews do call Him: Allah-im. Aramaic-speaking people also call GOD Almighty Allah. See the following videos for Biblical references and proofs. Also, pre-Islamic Biblical archeological findings have GOD Almighty as "Allah". So the Original Holy Name for GOD Almighty is not Eloh. It is Allah! Eloh is a Hebrew dialect, which not all Hebrew speakers use anyway. Allah had always been the Original and Universal GOD Almighty even before birth of Judaism, and the existence Hebrew. And Hebrew is a developed language from Phoenician. See the following links:


(Click to play videos)


Phoenician alphabet - Wikipedia
Biblical Hebrew - Wikipedia

Utasubiri sanaaà [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] kabla hata baba kasimu hajamtoa allah mfukoni, WAKRISTO WALIKUWA WANASOMA BIBLIA TAKATIFU MAKANISANI NA NJE YA MAKANISA NA KUHUBIRI UPENDO WA YESU! baba kasimu kafa KAYAACHA MAKANISA YANASOMA BIBLIA TAKATATIFU NDANI NA NJE YA MAKANISA YAKIENDELEA KUHUBIRI UPENDO WA YESU [emoji123] [emoji106] WEWE NAWE UTANUNA UTAWAACHA MAKANISANI WANAHUBIRI KUPITIA BIBLIA TAKATIFU UPENDO WA YESU MFUFUKA...HADI MWISHO WA DAHARI...TUTAENDA KTK MAKAZI ALIYO TUANDALIA YESU [emoji106] NA WALE WOÓTE MAKAFIRI WENYE ALAMA USONI MOTONI [emoji117]

 

[Che mittoga]

Utasubiri sanaaà [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] kabla hata baba kasimu hajamtoa allah mfukoni, WAKRISTO WALIKUWA WANASOMA BIBLIA TAKATIFU MAKANISANI NA NJE YA MAKANISA NA KUHUBIRI UPENDO WA YESU! baba kasimu kafa KAYAACHA MAKANISA YANASOMA BIBLIA TAKATATIFU NDANI NA NJE YA MAKANISA YAKIENDELEA KUHUBIRI UPENDO WA YESU [emoji123] [emoji106] WEWE NAWE UTANUNA UTAWAACHA MAKANISANI WANAHUBIRI KUPITIA BIBLIA TAKATIFU UPENDO WA YESU MFUFUKA...HADI MWISHO WA DAHARI...TUTAENDA KTK MAKAZI ALIYO TUANDALIA YESU [emoji106] NA WALE WOÓTE MAKAFIRI WENYE ALAMA USONI MOTONI [emoji117] View attachment 912520View attachment 912522

Hapo uliponukuu pana siri nzito sana, ingawa Roho Mtakatifu amekwisha watahadharisha wanadamu.
Waislamu wanapaswa kuisoma hiyo sura ya kitabu cha Ufunuo kwa tafakari ya hali ya juu sana.
Na kujiuliza,
Nini hasa Asili na Maana ya Chapa ya kovu katika Paji la Uso na Mkononi, Viganjani mwao, au SIGIDA, iwe inaonekana au imejificha.

 

[2013]

Hoja yako ya msingi hapa ni kitu gani? inaonyesha hata kusoma huwa husomi kwasababu unaandika mambo mengi lakini yanajirudia rudia tu , Mungu alishamsifu Mohamadi kuwa ana tabia bora kabisa

Because..
Allah is a mohammad fiction's character. Katika biography ya Mohammad, Mo anajisifu kwa kufanya uovu Mwingi. Na pia anajivunia kufanikiwa kupitia uovu huo. Fahamu tu, Hii ni mbali kabisa na vile tunavyomlaumu.

Lakini hapohapo unagundua kua, amefanana na Baba wa nyumba, ambaye Hairuhusiwi watoto wake waseme uovu wake bali wausifie.

Mo alikua idealistic sana, kwa kila baya analotenda, allah anakuja na verse ili kuhalalisha ikiwemo ile ya kumuoa mtoto wake. Kumkataa Mama yake mzazi, kuwaua wazazi wa Safiyah nk.Na hapa kuna volumes and volumes of proofs.

Mohammedanism is practical, social, UNSPIRITUAL, concerned to win the empire of this world.
Like devotees of all cults, his followers rose to champion his cause with dedication. By defying death and butchering others they made Islam the world's second largest religion, and now the biggest threat to human civilization.

When you read the character of allah, you'll found out, we have been fooled. Allah is not even exists in the world of ours. And This DOES NOT MEAN GOD IS NOT EXISTS.

Mo alikua akipeleka jeshi lake kupigana Vita, ikitokea Jeshi lake limeshindwa. anawaambia watu wake kua kwasababu allah alichukia. Ikitokea wameshinda anawaambia wameshinda kwasababu allah kafurahi kawapatia ushindi.

Kuna vita jeshi lake lilienda likamletea Mali. Mwanzo alikataa akiwaambia wana dhambi wamekwenda kinyume na kalenda. Alipogaiwa nyara zilizopatikana na vita hiyo. Akasema allah karuhusu(sources zipo).

Mo alikua anaanguka kifafa na kuweweseka. Hii inamuweka kwenye question mark kama alikua sawa mentally. Ukizingatia kua aliyemuambia kua yeye amekua Mtume ni mkewe. Sio mohammad mwenyewe.

Mo aliishi kwa kuvamia na kupora mali za kwenye misafara ya Wafanyabiashara mabedui. Alitajirika sana.

Pia inasemekana Mo alikua capable of
Bewitched. Hii inaleta wasiwasi zaidi kwa Mtu anayejiita Mtume wa allah.

 

[Kisoda2]

Ujajibu swali la msingi kabisa unaangaika tu nimekuuliza Mungu alikuwa wapi mpaka Hawa anashawishiwa na shetani kula tunda? unajibu walichagua mwenyewe kifo mpuuzi kabisa hawakuchagua wenyewe walishawishiwi sasa kwanini Mungu akuingilia kati kuzuia shetani asiwashawishi kula tunda? ahahahhaah inawezekana huyo shetani ndio huyo huyo Mungu wako
1 SAMUEL 16:14-15
14" Now YAHWEH'S Spirit departed from Saul, and an EVIL Spirit from YAHWEH troubled him"
15" Saul servants said to him " see now an evil spirit from YAHWEH troubled him";

Ahahahahaahahaahaha unatupigia kelele hapa shetani shetani , wakati Mungu wako mwenyewe ana roho ya kishetani alimtupia Saul wa watu Ahahahahaahahaahaha

Nimekujibu kitambo.
Mungu alikuwepo na aliona. Hiyo ilikuwa kazi ya ADAM. Yeye ndiye alipewa jukumu la kumfundisha, no matter what, don't even touch this tree. Mwisho wa yote naye alikula. Angalia vizuri Mungu alipokuja kwanini alimuuliza Adam na siyo hawa aliyekula mwanzo? na kwanini maongezi yote yalikuwa ni Mungu na Adam?

Kuhusu 1Samwel 16:14 -15.
Soma kisa kuanzia mwanzo utaona nini kinamtokea Saul. Acha kurukia mistari ya kati na kuja na stupid conclusion.

Evil Spirits are those whom Thee Lord Cursed and kicked them from Heaven. And He promised them Hell fire is their destiny.
According to scriptures, Satan/Lucifer is Lord of this World.
Alipoondoka ROHO wa Mungu fasta kaingia Iblis na kuanza kumtesa. Kisha amemuasi Mungu na Iblis ndiyo raha yake ili ajipatie wafuasi.

Anyway, do you believe in Christian Bible or Allah's Bible?

 

[Gavana]

Utasubiri sanaaà [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] kabla hata baba kasimu hajamtoa allah mfukoni, WAKRISTO WALIKUWA WANASOMA BIBLIA TAKATIFU MAKANISANI NA NJE YA MAKANISA NA KUHUBIRI UPENDO WA YESU! baba kasimu kafa KAYAACHA MAKANISA YANASOMA BIBLIA TAKATATIFU NDANI NA NJE YA MAKANISA YAKIENDELEA KUHUBIRI UPENDO WA YESU [emoji123] [emoji106] WEWE NAWE UTANUNA UTAWAACHA MAKANISANI WANAHUBIRI KUPITIA BIBLIA TAKATIFU UPENDO WA YESU MFUFUKA...HADI MWISHO WA DAHARI...TUTAENDA KTK MAKAZI ALIYO TUANDALIA YESU [emoji106] NA WALE WOÓTE MAKAFIRI WENYE ALAMA USONI MOTONI [emoji117] View attachment 912520View attachment 912522

The Broken Promise Of Revelation ​

Revelation 22:18


18I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book.

John is basically giving out a threat in order to reassure the readers that this book (Revelation) will stay intact and uncorrupted...


The integrity of the book is preserved by a solemn warning of the danger of losing a part in the tree of life. (John Darby's Synopsis of the New Testament, Commentary on Revelation Chapter 22, Source)


The supplication of John (which is the third part of the confirmation) joined with a curse of abhorrence, to preserve the truth of this book entire and uncorrupted in two verses. (The 1599 Geneva Study Bible, Commentary on Revelation 22:18, Source)

However, we see that there was a corrupted verse inserted into the book of Revelation before. That verse is Revelation 1:11. The verse is found in the King James Version of the Bible...


Revelation 1:11


[11] Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last: and, What thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven churches which are in Asia; unto Ephesus, and unto Smyrna, and unto Pergamos, and unto Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and unto Philadelphia, and unto Laodicea. (KJV)


However, when one reads the NIV Bible...


Revelation 1:11


which said: "Write on a scroll what you see and send it to the seven churches: to Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia and Laodicea." (NIV)


We can clearly see that the phrase, " Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last" is an interpolated verse.


Taken from Commentary


This wording at the beginning of the KJV's version of Rev. 1:11 is not found in virtually any ancient texts, nor is it mentioned, even as a footnote, in any modern translation or in Bruce Metzger's definitive A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, Second Edition (New York: United Bible Societies, 1994, phone: 800-322-4253).

• (The New King James Version [NKJV] does include this wording; but the NKJV is not a modern translation; it is only a modern-English rewording of the the original KJV, minus the Aprocrypha, since the Aprocrypha was in the original KJV.)
  
  
  
  John in Revelation 22:18 basically promised that no one would be able to add anything to this book by threatening anyone who did do so. However, we do see that a verse was indeed falsely added to this book. So that means that the promise was broken to stop these additions. Now reading this verse does not give me any 100% assurance that this book is truly indeed 100% the word of God.
  

 

[Gavana]

Utasubiri sanaaà [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] kabla hata baba kasimu hajamtoa allah mfukoni, WAKRISTO WALIKUWA WANASOMA BIBLIA TAKATIFU MAKANISANI NA NJE YA MAKANISA NA KUHUBIRI UPENDO WA YESU! baba kasimu kafa KAYAACHA MAKANISA YANASOMA BIBLIA TAKATATIFU NDANI NA NJE YA MAKANISA YAKIENDELEA KUHUBIRI UPENDO WA YESU [emoji123] [emoji106] WEWE NAWE UTANUNA UTAWAACHA MAKANISANI WANAHUBIRI KUPITIA BIBLIA TAKATIFU UPENDO WA YESU MFUFUKA...HADI MWISHO WA DAHARI...TUTAENDA KTK MAKAZI ALIYO TUANDALIA YESU [emoji106] NA WALE WOÓTE MAKAFIRI WENYE ALAMA USONI MOTONI [emoji117] View attachment 912520View attachment 912522

The Book of Revelation:


"The author of the book calls himself John, who because of his Christian faith has been exiled to the rocky island of Patmos, a Roman penal colony. Although he never claims to be John the apostle, he was so identified by several of the early church Fathers, including Justin, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Terullian, Cyprian, and Hippolytus. This identification, however, was denied by other Fathers, including Denis of Alexandria, Eusebius of Caesarea, Cyril of Jerusalem, Gregory Nazianzen, and John Chrysostom. Indeed, vocabulary, grammar, and style make it doubtful that the book could have been put into its present form by the same persons responsible for the fourth gospel. (The New American Bible, ISBN: 978-0-529-06484-4, Page 1373)"


"Four times the author identifies himself as John (1:1,4,9; 22:8).....In the third century, however, an African bishop named Dionysius compared the language, style and thought of the Apocalypse (Revelation) with that of the other writings of John and decided that the book could not been written by the apostle of John. He suggested that the author was a certain John the Presbyter, whose name appears elsewhere in ancient writings. Although many today follow Dionysius in his view of authorship, the external evidence seems overwhelmingly supportive of the traditional view. (From the NIV Bible Commentary [1], page 1922)"


Again, we don't know who wrote the Book of Revelation. It is certainly highly doubtful that it was written by Apostle John. The Theologians and Historians of the NIV Bible seem to agree with the invalidity of this book from the above quote. So are you now going to consider the other John's words as the Words and Inspirations of GOD Almighty?


As we see, the style of writing in the book of Revelation is different from the books that are believed to be from John which are the Gospel of John, 1 John, 2 John and 3 John.

The book of Revelation's style seems to be closer to John the Presbyter's writings. This man is known in ancient writings. There are also many Christian theologians today that hold the same view about the falsety of the book of Revelation.


Isn't this sufficient enough to prove that the book is doubtful?


Notice that in the sections of "Gospel of John" and "Gospels of 1, 2 & 3 John" above, the author did not identify himself and it was ASSUMED without actual proofs that it was Saint John who wrote them. Notice how they said that if he were to identify himself, then it would be hard for them to explain it.


Now, notice the author in the Book of Revelation does identify himself as John, but he has a complete different language and style of writing from the other books, which created much uncertainty about its validity in the Church.


My questions here are: Who wrote the Books?

And is or is not Saint John supposed to identify himself in his books?

And where are his books that have his name on them?


Again, keep in mind that the NT was not even documented on paper until 150 to 300 years after Jesus (depending on what Christian you talk to).

So the dating is way too long for us to be assuming books to belong to certain people. Let alone considering their nonsense (contents) as the True Living Words of GOD Almighty.