Mtume Muhammad: Jamii isipotoshwe; Jua huzama katika Chemchemu ya matope Meusi na Mazito

[masoud mshahara]

Unayemwita "Mtumwa" ni Mkuu kuliko Mwanadamu awaye yote aliyekuwapo na atakayekuja.

Na amekuja na MAAGIZO MAZITO kutoka Juu.
Thou shalt not Kill,
Thou shalt not commit adultery.
The Devil is Judged.

The Most importantly is.."Thou shalt not sin no more.."

#Mti Mwema hujulikana kwa Matunda Yake.

Ahahahahaahahaahaha sio mimi nimemuita kajiita mwenyewe ahhahahhahahahh
YOHANA 17:3
" Na uzima wa milele ndio huu wakujue wewe Mungu wa pekee wa kweli , na Yesu ULIEMTUMA";

Ahahahahaahahaahaha hivyo ndivyo ilivyo boss ni mmoja tu , tena wapekee

 

[Gavana]

Wewe sio Muislamu. Unatoka kwenye mipaka yako ya uislamu. Unageukia atheism. Umechanganyikiwa. Hujui ujitetee kitu gani. Hapa, haumsaidii roho Mohammad bali unazidi kuonyesha how pathetic you always are...

THE SINLESSNESS OF JESUS CHRIST, ACCORDING TO THE QUR’AN, HADITH AND BIBLE


Almost every person tries to be as good as they can be. Everyone wants to be thought well of by others and think well of themselves. The Bible sets a very high standard for personal and corporate behaviour: ‘be holy, because I am holy,’ God told the ancient Jews.1 Jesus used the same standard: ‘Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect’ (Matthew 5:48). Has anyone ever been able to live up to this standard?

The Qur’an.


Jesus Christ (Isa al-Masih) is described as being without fault from the moment of his birth. The angel Gabriel declared to Mary: ‘I am a messenger from your Lord to give you a boy most pure [zakiyyan]’ (Q.19:19).

The expression ‘most pure’ means blameless, guiltless and sinless according to the Muslim scholars al-Baidawi, al-Tabari and al-Zamakhshari.

The classical commentator Fakhr al-Din al-Razi (d. 606/1209) stated:
Faultless [zakiyyan] means three things:

- First, that he is without sin;

- secondly that he in integrity, as it is said that he who has no sin is chaste and in the growing plant there is purity;

- thirdly, he was above reproach and pure.

Quran 3:36,

Jesus’ follower Peter described him as ‘the Holy and Righteous One’ (Acts 3:14) who ‘went around doing good’ (Acts 10:38).

The Bible says that Jesus was without sin:
we have a great high priest who has ascended into heaven, Jesus the Son of God … For we do not have a high priest who is unable to empathise with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are – yet he did not sin (Hebrews 4:15).
Jesus ‘is holy, blameless, pure, set apart from sinners, exalted above the heavens’ (Hebrews 7:26).

Let us quote the passage:

John did baptize in the wilderness, and preach the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins. (Mark 1:4)



Then Jesus came from Galilee to the Jordan to be baptized by John. But John tried to deter him, saying, "I need to be baptized by you, and do you come to me?" Jesus replied, "Let it be so now; it is proper for us to do this to fulfill all righteousness." Then John consented. (Matthew 3:13-15)



Jesus acknowledged that he descended from a cursed lineage, and therefore needed to be baptized. That is the only explanation to solve the problem. John believed that Jesus was sinless, but he volunteered to be baptized.

God cursed King Jeconiah and his descendants forever.



"As surely as I live," declares the LORD, "even if you, Jehoiachin son of Jehoiakim king of Judah, were a signet ring on my right hand, I would still pull you off.



This is what the LORD says: "Record this man as if childless, a man who will not prosper in his lifetime, for none of his offspring will prosper, none will sit on the throne of David or rule any more in Judah." (Jeremiah 22:24, 30)


The Gospel of Matthew adopts Jesus into the cursed lineage:


And after the deportation to Babylon: Jechoniah was the father of Shealtiel, and Shealtiel the father of Zerubbabel, and Zerubbabel the father of Abiud, and Abiud the father of Eliakim, and Eliakim the father of Azor, and Azor the father of Zadok, and Zadok the father of Achim, and Achim the father of Eliud, and Eliud the father of Eleazar, and Eleazar the father of Matthan, and Matthan the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ. (Matthew 1:13-16)


According to Psalms 132, the Messiah would sit on David’s throne.


The LORD swore an oath to David, a sure oath that he will not revoke: "One of your own descendants I will place on your throne- if your sons keep my covenant and the statutes I teach them, then their sons will sit on your throne for ever and ever." (Psalms 132:11-12)



But since Jesus descended from the cursed Jeconiah, he never sat on David’s throne. If only Jesus had descended from a separate line, he could’ve sat on the throne.


Jesus never reigned over the house of Jacob or sat on David’s throne (Lloyd Graham, Deceptions and Myths of the Bible, p. 298)



On the contrary, the Pontius Pilate is sitting on the throne judging Jesus!

 

[masoud mshahara]

Tunalia kweli sio maskhara [emoji24] [emoji24] HAQI unaiona masudi kwa nini unatakaabari na kumuabudu popobawa aliye jimithirisha kama malaika wa Nuru [emoji24] [emoji24] [emoji24]

Acha ushirikina wa kumfanya binadamu mwenzio kuwa Mungu, kwa kweli ni jambo kusikitisha sana sana sana , mwanafunzi amemzidi mwalimu hii ni hatari sana ahaahhhhhahaha

 

[mgen]

mbuzi kula nyasi na kunya gololi ndio injili nyengine ya paulo au yesu ?? SHIRIKINA WEWEEEE


You have verses that indicate that Paul was preaching his own Gospel...

Romans 2:16

16 This will take place on the day when God will judge men's secrets through Jesus Christ, as my gospel declares.


Romans 16:25

Now to him who is able to establish you by my gospel and the proclamation of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery hidden for long ages past,



You have verses that indicate that Paul was preaching the Gospel of God...


Romans 15:16


16 to be a minister of Christ Jesus to the Gentiles with the priestly duty of proclaiming the gospel of God, so that the Gentiles might become an offering acceptable to God, sanctified by the Holy Spirit.


2 Corinthians 11:7


7 Was it a sin for me to lower myself in order to elevate you by preaching the gospel of God to you free of charge?



You have verses that indicate that Paul was preaching the Gospel of Christ...


1 Corinthians 9:13


But we did not use this right. On the contrary, we put up with anything rather than hinder the gospel of Christ. 13Don't you know that those who work in the temple get their food from the temple, and those who serve at the altar share in what is offered on the altar?


2 Corinthians 2:12


12Now when I went to Troas to preach the gospel of Christ and found that the Lord had opened a door for me,


2 Corinthians 9:13


13Because of the service by which you have proved yourselves, men will praise God for the obedience that accompanies your confession of the gospel of Christ, and for your generosity in sharing with them and with everyone else.


2 Corinthians 10:14


14We are not going too far in our boasting, as would be the case if we had not come to you, for we did get as far as you with the gospel of Christ.


Romans 1:9


9God, whom I serve with my whole heart in preaching the gospel of his Son, is my witness how constantly I remember you



The last verse shows a distinction between God and his Son (referring to Jesus).


So was Paul preaching his own gospel, the gospel of Jesus or the Gospel of God?

Mbuzi Fundi kama wewe unavyo badili ndimi yako badala ya kusema karanga unaitwa karakara [emoji38] [emoji38]

 

[2013]

Let us quote the passage:

John did baptize in the wilderness, and preach the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins. (Mark 1:4)



Then Jesus came from Galilee to the Jordan to be baptized by John. But John tried to deter him, saying, "I need to be baptized by you, and do you come to me?" Jesus replied, "Let it be so now; it is proper for us to do this to fulfill all righteousness." Then John consented. (Matthew 3:13-15)



Jesus acknowledged that he descended from a cursed lineage, and therefore needed to be baptized. That is the only explanation to solve the problem. John believed that Jesus was sinless, but he volunteered to be baptized.

God cursed King Jeconiah and his descendants forever.



"As surely as I live," declares the LORD, "even if you, Jehoiachin son of Jehoiakim king of Judah, were a signet ring on my right hand, I would still pull you off.



This is what the LORD says: "Record this man as if childless, a man who will not prosper in his lifetime, for none of his offspring will prosper, none will sit on the throne of David or rule any more in Judah." (Jeremiah 22:24, 30)


The Gospel of Matthew adopts Jesus into the cursed lineage:


And after the deportation to Babylon: Jechoniah was the father of Shealtiel, and Shealtiel the father of Zerubbabel, and Zerubbabel the father of Abiud, and Abiud the father of Eliakim, and Eliakim the father of Azor, and Azor the father of Zadok, and Zadok the father of Achim, and Achim the father of Eliud, and Eliud the father of Eleazar, and Eleazar the father of Matthan, and Matthan the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ. (Matthew 1:13-16)


According to Psalms 132, the Messiah would sit on David’s throne.


The LORD swore an oath to David, a sure oath that he will not revoke: "One of your own descendants I will place on your throne- if your sons keep my covenant and the statutes I teach them, then their sons will sit on your throne for ever and ever." (Psalms 132:11-12)



But since Jesus descended from the cursed Jeconiah, he never sat on David’s throne. If only Jesus had descended from a separate line, he could’ve sat on the throne.


Jesus never reigned over the house of Jacob or sat on David’s throne (Lloyd Graham, Deceptions and Myths of the Bible, p. 298)



On the contrary, the Pontius Pilate is sitting on the throne judging Jesus!

The hadith.


The hadith strongly hint at Christ’s sinlessness since he was spared the Satanic touch at birth.

‘The Prophet said,
“When any human being is born, Satan touches him at both sides of the body with his two fingers, except Jesus, the son of Mary, whom Satan tried to touch but failed, for he touched the placenta-cover instead.”’

This is based on Q.3:36,.
where Imran’s wife said of Jesus’ mother: ‘I have named her Mary and I commend her and her offspring to Thy protection from the Evil One the Rejected.’ Satan could not touch Jesus as he did every other person.
Another account has this description: ‘No child is born but that, Satan touches it when it is born where upon it starts crying loudly because of being touched by Satan, except Mary and her Son’.


Jesus is also the only prophet without sin. A hadith about the day of judgement finds all of the other prophets admitting to their sins: Adam confessed that he ate the fruit of the forbidden Noah had prayed a prayer against his nation, Abraham told three lies, Moses killed a man, and Muhammad needed all his former and latter sins forgiven. Jesus, however, is unique: it is said that ‘Jesus will not mention any sin’.

Referencesss.

Al-Bukhari 6:71, ibid.


Al-Bukhari 6:236, ibid.

Quran 59:23; 62:1.

.Qutan 16:61; 35:45.

Al-Fadi, The Person of Christ in the Gospel and the Koran, p. 10.


Al-Bukhari 4:506, http://sunnah.com/bukhari/65.

 

[2013]

Ahahahahaahahaahaha sio mimi nimemuita kajiita mwenyewe ahhahahhahahahh
YOHANA 17:3
" Na uzima wa milele ndio huu wakujue wewe Mungu wa pekee wa kweli , na Yesu ULIEMTUMA";

Ahahahahaahahaahaha hivyo ndivyo ilivyo boss ni mmoja tu , tena wapekee

"Awapokeaye ninyi, anipokea mimi; naye anipokeaye mimi, ampokea yeye aliyenituma".(Matthew 10:40).

 

[mgen]

Acha ushirikina wa kumfanya binadamu mwenzio kuwa Mungu, kwa kweli ni jambo kusikitisha sana sana sana , mwanafunzi amemzidi mwalimu hii ni hatari sana ahaahhhhhahaha

Binadamu hawezi kuwa MUNGU jee MUNGU hana Uwezo wa kuwa binadamu [emoji350] [emoji344] Jibu ukufuru ufe kafir [emoji12] [emoji53]

 

[Maarifa]

Naona Giza

 

[Gavana]

The hadith.


The hadith strongly hint at Christ’s sinlessness since he was spared the Satanic touch at birth.

‘The Prophet said,
“When any human being is born, Satan touches him at both sides of the body with his two fingers, except Jesus, the son of Mary, whom Satan tried to touch but failed, for he touched the placenta-cover instead.”’

This is based on Q.3:36,.
where Imran’s wife said of Jesus’ mother: ‘I have named her Mary and I commend her and her offspring to Thy protection from the Evil One the Rejected.’ Satan could not touch Jesus as he did every other person.
Another account has this description: ‘No child is born but that, Satan touches it when it is born where upon it starts crying loudly because of being touched by Satan, except Mary and her Son’.


Jesus is also the only prophet without sin. A hadith about the day of judgement finds all of the other prophets admitting to their sins: Adam confessed that he ate the fruit of the forbidden Noah had prayed a prayer against his nation, Abraham told three lies, Moses killed a man, and Muhammad needed all his former and latter sins forgiven. Jesus, however, is unique: it is said that ‘Jesus will not mention any sin’.

Referencesss.

Al-Bukhari 6:71, ibid.


Al-Bukhari 6:236, ibid.

Quran 59:23; 62:1.

.Qutan 16:61; 35:45.

Al-Fadi, The Person of Christ in the Gospel and the Koran, p. 10.


Al-Bukhari 4:506, http://sunnah.com/bukhari/65.

Matthew and Luke are over-zealous in making DAVID the King, the prime ancestor of Jesus, because of that false notion that Jesus was to sit on the "THRONE OF HIS FATHER DAVID" (Acts 2:30).

The Gospels belie this prophecy, for they tell us that instead of Jesus sitting on his father's (David's) throne, it was Pontious Pilate, a Roman Governor, a pagan who sat on that very throne and condemned its rightful (?) heir (Jesus) to death. "Never mind,'' says the evangelist, "if not in his first coming, then in his second coming he will fulfill this prophecy" (Ahmed Deedat, Is the Bible God’s Word? p. 38)


The Jews believed the Messiah would descend from David, and destroy the Romans. Yet Jesus failed to destroy the Romans, he was baptized to remove his past sins.

He descended from Jeconiah, so he couldn’t even sit on David’s throne. Jesus’ purpose was not crucifixion (Ps. 20:6, Mark 1:34), but only to preach the Gospel and the Torah.


The Jews wanted to kill Jesus to prove he was a false Messiah; they expected the Messiah to be victorious, and liberate Palestine from Roman rule. The Jews rejected Jesus because he was purely a spiritual teacher (John 1:11, 18:36), and not a political leader, as “foretold” in the Old Testament.

The Gospels record that Jesus was crucified for false political charges, yet the Pharisees had charges of blasphemy (claiming to be God’s son, working on the Sabbath). The Romans considered Jesus a threat to the occupation; they assumed he was a political leader disguised as spiritual teacher.



Jesus and his immediate followers were Pharisees. Jesus had no intention of founding a new religion. He regarded himself as the Messiah in the normal Jewish sense of the term, i.e. a human leader who would restore the Jewish monarchy, drive out the Roman invaders, set up an independent Jewish state, and inaugurate an era of peace, justice and prosperity (known as 'the kingdom of God,) for the whole world. (Hyam Maccoby, The Problem of Paul)



Secondly, if Jesus was crucified he couldn’t have been the Messiah. The Psalms describe the Messiah to be victorious (Ps. 18:50, 20:6, 28:8, 84:9). The Prophet David was the Anointed (Christ), a politico-religious leader, yet he was victorious over his enemies (2 Sam. 8:6, Ps. 144:10).

The Prophet David himself slaughtered thousands of his enemies (1 Sam 27:9), so how can Jesus be any different? The Jews expected another Messiah like David to descend from his lineage. The Gospels deny the Jewish Messiah by teaching the crucifixion, the Bible says God would save the Messiah (Psalms. 20:6).


He was not a militarist and did not build up an army to fight the Romans, since he believed that God would perform a great miracle to break the power of Rome. This miracle would take place on the Mount of Olives, as prophesied in the book of Zechariah.

When this miracle did not occur, his mission had failed. He had no intention of being crucified in order to save mankind from eternal damnation by his sacrifice. He never regarded himself as a divine being, and would have regarded such an idea as pagan and idolatrous, an infringement of the first of the Ten Commandments. (ibid)

 

[Gavana]

Binadamu hawezi kuwa MUNGU jee MUNGU hana Uwezo wa kuwa binadamu [emoji350] [emoji344] Jibu ukufuru ufe kafir [emoji12] [emoji53]

Kwani Yesu hana mwanzo kama binadamu mwengine yoyote ???

 

[Gavana]

Maneno hayo ya John 1:1-3 John 1:14 Kayasema nani ???


ANTHROPOMORPHISM

a. God need not take human form to understand human being.

Most of the other religions some time or the other believes in the philosophy of anthropomorphism i.e. God take human form. They have a very good logic for it Almighty God is so pure and Holy the he is unaware of the hardships, shortcomings, difficulties feelings etc. of the human being. He does not know how does a person feel when he is hurt or when he is in trouble etc. Therefore in order to set the rules for the human beings. He came down to the earth in the form of a human being. On the face of it, it seems to be a very good logic.

b. Creator prepares an instruction manual.

Suppose I manufacture a tape recorder. Do I have to become a tape recorder to know what is good or what is bad for the tape recorder? I write an instruction manual. In order to listen to the audiocassette, insert the cassette and press the play button. In order to stop, press the stop button. If you want to fast-forward press the FF. button. Do not drop it from a height it will get damaged. Do not immerse it in water it will get spoilt. I write an instruction manual. The dos and don’ts for the machine.

c. Holy Qur’an is the instruction manual for the human being.

In the similar fashion our lord and creator Allah (SWT) need not come in the form of a human being to know what is good or bad for the human being. He only has to reveal the instruction manual the last and final instruction manual of the human beings is the Holy Qur’an.

The dos and don’ts for the human beings is mentioned in the Holy Qur’an.

d. Allah chooses messengers:

Allah (SWT) need not come down personally for writing the instruction manual. He chooses a man amongst men to deliver the message and communication with him at a higher level through the revelation. Such chosen men are called as messengers and prophets of God.

 

[mgen]

Maneno hayo ya John 1:1-3 John 1:14 Kayasema nani ???


ANTHROPOMORPHISM

a. God need not take human form to understand human being.

Most of the other religions some time or the other believes in the philosophy of anthropomorphism i.e. God take human form. They have a very good logic for it Almighty God is so pure and Holy the he is unaware of the hardships, shortcomings, difficulties feelings etc. of the human being. He does not know how does a person feel when he is hurt or when he is in trouble etc. Therefore in order to set the rules for the human beings. He came down to the earth in the form of a human being. On the face of it, it seems to be a very good logic.

b. Creator prepares an instruction manual.

Suppose I manufacture a tape recorder. Do I have to become a tape recorder to know what is good or what is bad for the tape recorder? I write an instruction manual. In order to listen to the audiocassette, insert the cassette and press the play button. In order to stop, press the stop button. If you want to fast-forward press the FF. button. Do not drop it from a height it will get damaged. Do not immerse it in water it will get spoilt. I write an instruction manual. The dos and don’ts for the machine.

c. Holy Qur’an is the instruction manual for the human being.

In the similar fashion our lord and creator Allah (SWT) need not come in the form of a human being to know what is good or bad for the human being. He only has to reveal the instruction manual the last and final instruction manual of the human beings is the Holy Qur’an.

The dos and don’ts for the human beings is mentioned in the Holy Qur’an.

d. Allah chooses messengers:

Allah (SWT) need not come down personally for writing the instruction manual. He chooses a man amongst men to deliver the message and communication with him at a higher level through the revelation. Such chosen men are called as messengers and prophets of God.

Unataka tujadili Maandiko au mgongo wa ngisi [emoji350] [emoji344]

 

[Gavana]

Unataka tujadili Maandiko au mgongo wa ngisi [emoji350] [emoji344]

NINATAKA UNIAMBIE Maneno hayo ya John 1:1-3 , John 1:14 Kayasema nani ???

 

[2013]

Matthew and Luke are over-zealous in making DAVID the King, the prime ancestor of Jesus, because of that false notion that Jesus was to sit on the "THRONE OF HIS FATHER DAVID" (Acts 2:30).

The Gospels belie this prophecy, for they tell us that instead of Jesus sitting on his father's (David's) throne, it was Pontious Pilate, a Roman Governor, a pagan who sat on that very throne and condemned its rightful (?) heir (Jesus) to death. "Never mind,'' says the evangelist, "if not in his first coming, then in his second coming he will fulfill this prophecy" (Ahmed Deedat, Is the Bible God’s Word? p. 38)


The Jews believed the Messiah would descend from David, and destroy the Romans. Yet Jesus failed to destroy the Romans, he was baptized to remove his past sins.

He descended from Jeconiah, so he couldn’t even sit on David’s throne. Jesus’ purpose was not crucifixion (Ps. 20:6, Mark 1:34), but only to preach the Gospel and the Torah.


The Jews wanted to kill Jesus to prove he was a false Messiah; they expected the Messiah to be victorious, and liberate Palestine from Roman rule. The Jews rejected Jesus because he was purely a spiritual teacher (John 1:11, 18:36), and not a political leader, as “foretold” in the Old Testament.

The Gospels record that Jesus was crucified for false political charges, yet the Pharisees had charges of blasphemy (claiming to be God’s son, working on the Sabbath). The Romans considered Jesus a threat to the occupation; they assumed he was a political leader disguised as spiritual teacher.



Jesus and his immediate followers were Pharisees. Jesus had no intention of founding a new religion. He regarded himself as the Messiah in the normal Jewish sense of the term, i.e. a human leader who would restore the Jewish monarchy, drive out the Roman invaders, set up an independent Jewish state, and inaugurate an era of peace, justice and prosperity (known as 'the kingdom of God,) for the whole world. (Hyam Maccoby, The Problem of Paul)



Secondly, if Jesus was crucified he couldn’t have been the Messiah. The Psalms describe the Messiah to be victorious (Ps. 18:50, 20:6, 28:8, 84:9). The Prophet David was the Anointed (Christ), a politico-religious leader, yet he was victorious over his enemies (2 Sam. 8:6, Ps. 144:10).

The Prophet David himself slaughtered thousands of his enemies (1 Sam 27:9), so how can Jesus be any different? The Jews expected another Messiah like David to descend from his lineage. The Gospels deny the Jewish Messiah by teaching the crucifixion, the Bible says God would save the Messiah (Psalms. 20:6).


He was not a militarist and did not build up an army to fight the Romans, since he believed that God would perform a great miracle to break the power of Rome. This miracle would take place on the Mount of Olives, as prophesied in the book of Zechariah.

When this miracle did not occur, his mission had failed. He had no intention of being crucified in order to save mankind from eternal damnation by his sacrifice. He never regarded himself as a divine being, and would have regarded such an idea as pagan and idolatrous, an infringement of the first of the Ten Commandments. (ibid)

Let us turn to John 3:3 for a moment. Jesus made this solemn statement to Nicodemus.

John 3:3. Jesus answered and said to him, "Truly, truly (amen, amen, the same expression of strong affirmation), I say to you, unless one is born again (now notice those words), he cannot see the kingdom of God


John 8:51. "Truly, truly, I say to you, if anyone keeps My word he will never see death."


Hebrews 2:9. But we do see Him who has been made for a little while lower than the angels, namely, Jesus, because of the suffering of death crowned with glory and honor, that by the grace of God He might taste death for everyone.

By His death on the cross, Christ made it possible for us to live eternally with God.


John 3:36. "He who believes in the Son has eternal life; but he who does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him.

 

[2013]

NINATAKA UNIAMBIE Maneno hayo ya John 1:1-3 , John 1:14 Kayasema nani ???

Allah is a mohammad fiction's character. Moon god can't give instructions.
..Can neither breath nor talk.

 

[mgen]

NINATAKA UNIAMBIE Maneno hayo ya John 1:1-3 , John 1:14 Kayasema nani ???

Kumbe Hujui hata hayo Maandiko yamepatikana vipi [emoji15] [emoji47] Sasa unafanya nini humu [emoji350] [emoji344] rudi kilingeni ukaoshe mbuguma nuksi, kuandika tarasimu na kushona mahirizi...kafir mkubwa wee [emoji12] [emoji33] [emoji33]

 

[2013]

Matthew and Luke are over-zealous in making DAVID the King, the prime ancestor of Jesus, because of that false notion that Jesus was to sit on the "THRONE OF HIS FATHER DAVID" (Acts 2:30).

The Gospels belie this prophecy, for they tell us that instead of Jesus sitting on his father's (David's) throne, it was Pontious Pilate, a Roman Governor, a pagan who sat on that very throne and condemned its rightful (?) heir (Jesus) to death. "Never mind,'' says the evangelist, "if not in his first coming, then in his second coming he will fulfill this prophecy" (Ahmed Deedat, Is the Bible God’s Word? p. 38)


The Jews believed the Messiah would descend from David, and destroy the Romans. Yet Jesus failed to destroy the Romans, he was baptized to remove his past sins.

He descended from Jeconiah, so he couldn’t even sit on David’s throne. Jesus’ purpose was not crucifixion (Ps. 20:6, Mark 1:34), but only to preach the Gospel and the Torah.


The Jews wanted to kill Jesus to prove he was a false Messiah; they expected the Messiah to be victorious, and liberate Palestine from Roman rule. The Jews rejected Jesus because he was purely a spiritual teacher (John 1:11, 18:36), and not a political leader, as “foretold” in the Old Testament.

The Gospels record that Jesus was crucified for false political charges, yet the Pharisees had charges of blasphemy (claiming to be God’s son, working on the Sabbath). The Romans considered Jesus a threat to the occupation; they assumed he was a political leader disguised as spiritual teacher.



Jesus and his immediate followers were Pharisees. Jesus had no intention of founding a new religion. He regarded himself as the Messiah in the normal Jewish sense of the term, i.e. a human leader who would restore the Jewish monarchy, drive out the Roman invaders, set up an independent Jewish state, and inaugurate an era of peace, justice and prosperity (known as 'the kingdom of God,) for the whole world. (Hyam Maccoby, The Problem of Paul)



Secondly, if Jesus was crucified he couldn’t have been the Messiah. The Psalms describe the Messiah to be victorious (Ps. 18:50, 20:6, 28:8, 84:9). The Prophet David was the Anointed (Christ), a politico-religious leader, yet he was victorious over his enemies (2 Sam. 8:6, Ps. 144:10).

The Prophet David himself slaughtered thousands of his enemies (1 Sam 27:9), so how can Jesus be any different? The Jews expected another Messiah like David to descend from his lineage. The Gospels deny the Jewish Messiah by teaching the crucifixion, the Bible says God would save the Messiah (Psalms. 20:6).


He was not a militarist and did not build up an army to fight the Romans, since he believed that God would perform a great miracle to break the power of Rome. This miracle would take place on the Mount of Olives, as prophesied in the book of Zechariah.

When this miracle did not occur, his mission had failed. He had no intention of being crucified in order to save mankind from eternal damnation by his sacrifice. He never regarded himself as a divine being, and would have regarded such an idea as pagan and idolatrous, an infringement of the first of the Ten Commandments. (ibid)

Breast Suckling For Adult In Islam.


(Sahih Muslim, Book 17, Hadith 31) (p. 1452 ) “'Amrah reported that she heard Aisha discussing fosterage which (makes marriage) unlawful; and she (Aisha) said: There was revealed in the Holy Qur'an ten clear sucklings, and then five clear (sucklings).”
but the Hadith above dose not show its meant for adult, then let us read this one.
But where is the verse in the Qur'an about Adult BreastSuckling?

Th Goat ate the Qur'an!


‘the verse of stoning and of suckling an adult ten times was revealed, and they were written on a papers and kept under
my pillow. When the Messenger of Allah expired and we were busy with his death, a goat entered and ate it(the pages).’

(Sunan Ibn Majah, Hadith 1944)
'A'isha reported that Sahlaa bint Suhail came to Allah's massanger (Allah pray on him) and said:

Messenger of Allah, I see on the face of Abu Huzaifa some bad thoughts on entering of Salim (who is slave) into (our house), whereupon Allah's Apostle said: Suckle him.

She said: How can I suckle him as he is a grown-up man?

Allah's Messenger smiled and said:
I already know that he is a old man 'Amr has made this addition in his narration that he participated in the Battle of Badr and in the narration of Ibn 'Umar he said:
Allah's Messenger laughed.

(Sahih Al-Bukhari-Book 008, Hadith 3424) 
in Muslim's made translated text, they changed the words to make Muhammad order look more modest, so instead of “I know he is an old man” they change it to “I know he is a young man”


The words is where it says “old man”

Even Aisha Muhammad's favored young wife use to do it in order to have stranger men to inter in her private rooms.
Sahih Muslim Book 9, Hadith 2023 Arabic (Sahih Muslim Vol. 3, Book 9, Hadith 1947) Eng It was narrated from Zaynab bint Abi Salamah:
that the wives of the Prophet all differed with Aisha and refused to allow anyone with ties of breastfeeding like Salim, the freed salve of Abu Hudhaifah, to enter upon them.

They said: “How do we know? That may be a concession granted
only to Salim.”
In Islam forbidding to look at woman face, or shake her hand, but you can hold her breast and suck her nipples? ***

 

[2013]

MUHAMMAD THE UNIVERSAL PROPHET


Muslims’ claims about Muhammad being the only universal prophet, which is FALSE.

As an example, the story of Moses in the Qur’an tells that Moses was also sent by Allah to other nations and not only to the Jews.

Notice here that CHRISTIANS STRONGLY BELIEVE THAY MOSES WAS A PROPHET FOR THE JEWS.

MUSLIM TODAY CLAIM THE SAME AS WE BELIEVE ABOUT MOSES BEING A MESSENGER OF JEWS.


If Moses was sent to the Jews only,
HOW WOULD MUSLIMS ANSWER THIS VERSE IN THEIT QUR'AN:


Qur’an 10:75-76

75. Then afterwards We (Allah) sent, Moses and Aaron to Pharaoh and his chiefs with Our Signs. However, they were arrogant: they were people in crimes,
76. when the Truth did come to them from Us (Allah), they said, “This is indeed obvious sorcery!”

1. Allah sent two messengers to Pharaoh.

2. Allah wanted Pharaoh to believe in him.

3. To make Pharaoh believe, Allah showed him signs which meant miracles.

4. So if Moses is a Prophet sent only to the Jews, why did Allah himself say, “I sent the two prophets to Pharaoh”?

5. In verse 76, it’s clear that Allah wished to send them the truth (Islam) but they rejected it.

6. What’s funny is that the Islamic Moses of the Qur’an later on got angry and asked Allah not to make Pharaoh a Muslim!


Qur’an 10:88

Moses prayed: "Our Lord! Thou hast indeed bestowed on Pharaoh and his chiefs brilliancy and wealth in the present life, so they might deceive men from Thy Path. So, our Lord, destroy the features of their wealth, and send hardness to their hearts, so they will not believe so they will see the painful punishment.

"
From Tafsir Al-Jalalayn, we would read the following:

“And Moses said, “Our Lord, You have indeed given Pharaoh and his council brilliancy and riches in the life of this world. Our Lord, You have given them this, so that they may lead MANKIND ASTRAY, as a result thereof, from Your way, from Your religion Islam.

”
See link for interpretation:
Altafsir.com - The Tafsirs - التفاسير
tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=10&tAyahNo=88&tDisp lay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2
And here we go again.

Allah, who is the god of the Muslim Moses, tells us why he made Pharaoh rich and gave him power: so he might deceive his nation!


Qur’an 7:136

So We did revenge from them: We drowned them in the sea, because they rejected Our Signs and failed to accept and believe our warning.


Qur’an 73:15

We have sent to you, as a messenger an apostle, to be a witness concerning you, the same as We sent an apostle to Pharaoh.


Qur’an 10:83

“However, none believed in Moses except the offspring of his people, because they (Egyptians) fear of Pharaoh and his chiefs, lest they should persecute them.

”
As you see, it’s clear that Allah wanted Pharaoh to become a Muslim so he sent Moses the Messenger of the Jews! And when Pharaoh rejected Islam, Allah drowned him.


So Muslims have a false claim when they say that all other prophets meant to be sent to their own nation when their Qur’an contradicts that as we see in the this verse:


Qur’an 14:4

And We never sent a messenger save with the language of his nation that he might make the message clear for them. Then Allah sends which He will astray, and guides whom He will. He is the all Mighty, the Wise.


1. So Allah sends his messengers only from the same nation to be sure that he speaks the same language,
“We never sent a messenger save with the language of his nation”.

So if Muhammad can't be a messenger for a nation with a language different from his, therefore that means then he cannot be a messenger for the whole world but only for those who speak Arabic.


2. But Moses is not an Egyptian and his language is not the same with Pharaoh’s. Based on this verse, if Moses’ tongue was Egyptian, he must’ve been an Egyptian prophet.

Therefore, he cannot be a prophet to the Jews. This is a contradiction to Allah’s statement.


3. Muhammad can't be a prophet to the world, because he do speak Arabic only and that is one more contradiction refute all Muslims claim about Islam & Muhammad is for all the world not only for the Arab.

 

[2013]

IS HEAT FROM THE SUN OR FROM HELL FIRE?
Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 10, Hadith 512 Reported by Abu Huraira:
The Messenger of Allah said, “In very hot weather delay the middle day prayer until it becomes cooler because the severity of the heat is from the harrowing of Hell-fire. The Hell-fire of Hell complained to its Lord said: ‘O Lord! My parts are eating my construction, destroying one another.’ So Allah allowed it to take two breaths, one in the winter and the other in the summer. The breath in the summer is that period when you feel the extreme severe heat and the breath in the winter is at the time when you feel very severely cold’”.



So here we go again to expose the falsehood:


The story proves that Allah considers hell fire as a living creature that gets hot and even complains about its heat. Our heat on earth is not from the sun but from hell fire. Not only heat from hell but even the cold which is contrary to the function and duty of hell itself.

This makes it clear that the sun’s absence has nothing to do with cold in Allah’s science but it’s the breath of hell in winter. I am sure that Muslims wished the books of hadiths had never existed as each time, Muhammad’s words would prove their false statements and deception. At the same time, they not only prove that Islam is nothing but fairytale stories but point out that Muhammad is not trustworthy because of his falsifications.


 

[SANCTUS ANACLETUS]

Naona Giza

Nimeshindwa kuelewa. Sijayaona hayo majibu anayoyasema mleta Uzi.