Kisoda2
JF-Expert Member
- May 30, 2008
- 2,475
- 745
Usiwaonyeshe Nguruwe wengi hivyo Issa anaweza goma kuja maana anakuja kufanya vita nao!!
Mtume Muhammad: Jamii isipotoshwe; Jua huzama katika Chemchemu ya matope Meusi na Mazito
Mtume Muhammad: Jamii isipotoshwe; Jua huzama katika Chemchemu ya matope Meusi na Mazito
- Thread starter SANCTUS ANACLETUS
- Start date
- Status
mgen
JF-Expert Member
- Nov 18, 2010
- 23,169
- 9,054
Tukiwaambia baba qathem ni shetani KAMILI ktk umbile la kibinadamu wanabishia! Toka Yesu awafunge domo mapepo wasimdhihirishe hadi muhammad hakutamka Yesu Ni MWANA WA MUNGU KABAKIA isa isa isa!
mgen
JF-Expert Member
- Nov 18, 2010
- 23,169
- 9,054
[emoji122] [emoji122] [emoji122] [emoji106] [emoji38] [emoji38]
mgen
JF-Expert Member
- Nov 18, 2010
- 23,169
- 9,054
mgen
JF-Expert Member
- Nov 18, 2010
- 23,169
- 9,054
Huoni hapo shetani alikuwa kati ya swafan na aishà [emoji351] [emoji348] [emoji15] [emoji12] hiyo stori sikuitunga Mimi unaye nililia Lilia humu!
Kisoda2
JF-Expert Member
- May 30, 2008
- 2,475
- 745
Kisoda2
JF-Expert Member
- May 30, 2008
- 2,475
- 745
Wameishiwa bando aua wameenda kuchukua copy and paste ili wakija badala ya kujibu hoja wanakurupuka na miarticle ya Stone Kissers to prove wrong our books.
Gavana
JF-Expert Member
- Jul 19, 2008
- 33,637
- 8,947
Gavana
JF-Expert Member
- Jul 19, 2008
- 33,637
- 8,947
Kumbe VISODA HAWAONI MAKALIO YAO
Gavana
JF-Expert Member
- Jul 19, 2008
- 33,637
- 8,947
Saul of Tarsus – a witness for Jesus?
One is informed by Acts that St Paul's early day stance was as "Saul, the Christian persecutor". Yet if Saul really was a vigilante for orthodox Judaism at the time of Stephen's stoning (Acts 7.58-8.3), becoming the chief persecutor of Christians, no less – one wonders just where was Saul, not long before, when a supposed radical rabbi called Jesus was stirring up whole towns and villages?
Paul's role as religious policeman seems not to have awakened until shortly after the godman's death. But in itself this suggests Jesus of Nazareth had no great impact. After all, Saul was a contemporary of Jesus in time and place, raised in Jerusalem ("at the feet of Gamaliel" – Acts 22.3) at precisely the time the godman was overturning moneychangers in the Temple and generally provoking Pharisees and Sadducees.
Would not Saul, a young religious hothead ("exceedingly zealous of the traditions" – Galatians 1.14) have waded into those multitudes to heckle and attack the Nazarene himself? Would he not have been an enthusiastic witness to JC's blasphemy before the Sanhedrin? And where was Saul during "passion week", surely in Jerusalem with the other zealots celebrating the holiest of festivals? And yet he reports not a word of the crucifixion?
Paul, another "witness for Jesus", saw and heard nothing!
Kisoda2
JF-Expert Member
- May 30, 2008
- 2,475
- 745
Siunaona!!
Article haina hata ulinganifu na nilichouliza.
Paul is a BIG Nightmare of you Abduls of today!!
Nikuulize swali Dogo sana ila unijibu kwa kutumia akili.
Huyu PAUL unayemuongelea kila wakati, MACHAPISHO yake MUHAMMAD nani alimtanguli mwenzake?
Kisoda2
JF-Expert Member
- May 30, 2008
- 2,475
- 745
Sisi na ninyi Abduls nani haoni KUNDULE?
Mnakomaa na kukanusha Trinity, ilhali ninyi mna itenda kilasaa. Kutawadha lazima uoshe juso lako x3, sukutua domo lako x3, guu lako x3, etc.
WHY not four? why not one?
Hizi ndio Article/clip elimishi maana unapata andiko la kuthibitisha nini mtu anauliza, siyo unakuja na mawazo mbweha kajishibia KOJO la ngamia kaandika kwa uelewa wake duni nawe unatuletea hapa.
Burudika nayo hii.
mgen
JF-Expert Member
- Nov 18, 2010
- 23,169
- 9,054
Usituletee mambo ya analogia wakati ni kipindi cha digital [emoji12] [emoji15] hayo uliyo andika ni ya kaumu gani [emoji348] [emoji348] [emoji351] ndio sababu baba fatûu kawarushia dongo [emoji117] View attachment 956240
mgen
JF-Expert Member
- Nov 18, 2010
- 23,169
- 9,054
Kama gavana ndio kapata jukwaa humu kupigia debe mgongo wa ngisi kila siku akitoka humu anaenda kilingeni kwake kushona hirizi, kuandi tarasimu kuosha mbuguma nuksi[emoji15] [emoji12] huku akisubiri kukamuliwa ngama [emoji15] [emoji38] [emoji38]
Gavana
JF-Expert Member
- Jul 19, 2008
- 33,637
- 8,947
Na huyo aliyeamrisha ni mungu gani??
Gavana
JF-Expert Member
- Jul 19, 2008
- 33,637
- 8,947
Tutangazie , woga umekushika wa nini?? Usikatishe vijana tamaa
Gavana
JF-Expert Member
- Jul 19, 2008
- 33,637
- 8,947
Kisoda2
JF-Expert Member
- May 30, 2008
- 2,475
- 745
Kisoda2
JF-Expert Member
- May 30, 2008
- 2,475
- 745
Huko kwenye USHOGA usiende usije sababishwa nikapigwa BAN au uzi kufutwa. Wasomaji kwakakosa kujifunza kuhusu STONE KISSERS cult!.
Who was this guy so called Dihyah Al-Kalbi to Muhammad? if i may ask first?
Gavana
JF-Expert Member
- Jul 19, 2008
- 33,637
- 8,947
Ndivyo unavyowaambia Maaskofu , Kamata hiyo??
Pata dose nyingine ulegee zaidi
Two Pauls – One Illusion
The trail-blazing Christian missionary and apostle, St Paul, appears nowhere in the secular histories of his age (not in Tacitus, not in Pliny, not in Josephus, etc.) Though Paul, we are told, mingled in the company of provincial governors and had audiences before kings and emperors, no scribe thought it worthwhile to record these events. The popular image of the saint is selectively crafted from two sources: the Book of Acts and the Epistles which bear his name. Yet the two sources actually present two radically different individuals and two wildly divergent stories. Biblical scholars are only too familiar with the conundrum that chunks of Paul's own story, gleaned from the epistles, are incompatible with the tale recorded in Acts but live with the "divine mystery" of it all. Perish the thought that they might recognize the whole saga is a work of pious fiction.
Acts
The Paul of Acts is a team player. His conversion on the road to Damascus is so important that it is repeated three times (son et lumiere). From a previous state of error (as "Saul", the persecuting Jewish zealot) he is brought into the loving embrace of the fledgling church.
Now part of the brethren ("with them coming in and going out at Jerusalem" - 9.28), he is "managed" by the elders. Disciples "took him" from Damascus (9.25) and Barnabas "brought him" to the apostles (9.27). They "brought him" to Caesarea and then they "sent him" to Tarsus. Barnabas "brought" Paul back to Antioch (11.26) and then with him was "sent" to Jerusalem with famine relief (11.30) – (as it happens, a visit to Jerusalem completely unknown to Paul himself).
Eventually the brethren "send" Paul on his first missionary journey (13.4). As a missionary, Paul is very much on the collective message:
"And as they went through the cities they delivered them the decrees for to keep that were ordained of the apostles and elders which were at Jerusalem. And so were the churches established." – Acts 16.4,5.
From Thessalonica, Paul is "sent away" to Berea by the brethren (17.10). He is also "sent away" by sea and "brought" to Athens (17.14,15). In Cenchrea, Paul even takes a Jewish vow and shaves his head! (18.18).
Though his name is cited in Acts 177 times, "Paul" is never coupled with the familiar honorific "apostle". The closest Acts comes to bestowing the title is 14.14 where his name follows Barnabas and the plural is used. In every other instance, Paul is an entity quite separate from, and implicitly subordinate to, the apostles. The slight is striking, given that Acts was supposedly written by Luke, Paul's companion and admirer.
Epistles
In stark contrast, the Paul of the Epistles is a bombastic maverick, representing no one but himself and under no one's direction. It is Paul who is doing the directing. Full of his own importance, in all his letters Paul hammers home the point that he is an apostle and that his appointment comes directly from the divine. His "proof" of this is his own success as a missionary (e.g. 2 Corinthians 2,3) – an argument of dubious merit still used by churches today. Look at our success! We must be right!
Paul makes no reference to a "Damascene road" conversion nor to an origin in Tarsus (Jerome reported that Paul was from Galilee!). He makes no reference to Cyprus and the battle with a rival magician, nor does he refer to the edict from James on food prohibitions and fornication. Paul, it seems, owes nothing to any man. A bad-tempered bully, he wastes little sympathy on those who do not accept his point of view. Thus when he loses the support of Peter and Barnabas over eating with Gentiles, Paul rebukes Peter publicly and writes that he has reneged out of "fear" and Barnabas has been naively "carried away" (Galatians 2.12,13).
- Status