Mtume Muhammad: Jamii isipotoshwe; Jua huzama katika Chemchemu ya matope Meusi na Mazito

[2013]

THE REGION THAT CONTROLS OUR MOVEMENTS

No indeed! If he does not stop, We will grab him by the forelock, a lying, sinful forelock. (Qur’an, 96:15-16)
The expression "the lying, sinful forelock" in the above verse is most interesting. Research carried out in recent years has revealed that the prefrontal area, which is responsible for the management of particular functions of the brain, falsification in the frontal part of the skull. Scientists only discovered the functions of this area, which the Qur’an pointed out 1,400 years ago,

Miracles of the Qur'an - Modern Science Reveals New Miracles of the Qur'an

---------------------------------------------------------

My answer
Control of Movement

Qur’an 96:15-16 – Harun Yahya’s translaltion “No indeed! If he does not stop, We will grab him by the forelock, a lying sinful forelock”.
At the end of the Muslim's explanation of this chapter (sura), some of the listed scientists’ literature doesn’t even mention the word “forelock.” Evidently, after examining the scientists’ books and material, these scientists don’t support this Sura.

Since nothing was found to substantiate the Muslims’ claim in the Sura that this is intracranial related, then the conclusion by definition is that this “forelock” is external to the brain. Forelock is referred to as a piece of hair, not intracranial (internal to the head). Many of us have heard the term a “lock” of hair, meaning a piece of hair. Oxfords English Dictionary defines forelock as hair growing just above the forehead.

Do scientists say that the control of movement is in our hair or is this Islamic science?
Looking at Arabic sources such as the (Shaker) English Arabic dictionary, which has 8 Arabic dictionaries, it confirms without a doubt that Sura 96:15-16 indeed refers to a lock of hair growing just above the forehead. This shows that the Muslim who is explaining this Sura is in gross error of its meaning and/or is deliberately trying to deceive his fellow Muslims and non-Muslims.

This following Tafsir shows that forelock is the hair:
Tafsir Al-Jalalayn 96:15
No for sure as punishment for him for his belief, We shall seize him by the forelock, We shall grab, drag him to the Fire by his forelock,

And all Muslims interpretations agree about it, but these new claims are something new with new waves of scientific Qur'an propaganda.

Even one of the most prowed name in Islam he agree that this is the Forelock front hair on the head.
Book of Tafsir Al-Qur'an by Imam Fakher Al-Deen Al-Razi he said: “ we will Hold him from his forelock, and drag him in too fire , and word Safi' mean graping and holding with strength, as He say(Allah):

Qur'an 55:41
“(For) the sinners will be known by their marks: a n d they will be seized by their forelocks and their feet”


From Tafsir al-Jalalayn
“The guilty will be recognised by their mark: wich is blackened faces and blue eyes; so they will be seized by the forelocks and the feet.”

Even in Harun Yahya's translation it says:
“We will grab him by the forelock, a lying sinful forelock”

It's clear that the verse is speaking about hair.

Qur’an 96:14

ٰىَرَيَّلٱ ّنَأِب مَلْعَيْمَلَأ

Did he not know that God sees,
Muslims are supposed to understand that Allah knows everything. Apparently Allah doesn't, according to Muhammad.

Qur’an 96:16
A lying, sinful forelock!
Al-Jalalayn said this is just a description for the sinful forelock of Abu Jahel, Muhammad's uncle. In such terms it's meant figuratively, but what he actually meant was this individual, Abu Jahel.

This is not even about every human. It's about one individual, in this case, the uncle of Muhammad.
This Tafsir is talking about Muhammad’s uncle, Abdullah bin Abdul Uzza which means Abu requirement flame and also known as Abu Otbah who died in 624. He is a half-brother of Abdullah bin Abdul-Muttalib, Muhammad’s father.

Abdul Uzza, his known nickname later was called Abu Jahl for refusing to accept Islam. Only two uncles of Muhammad accepted Islam after they lost war with him and even Abu Taleb who was like a father to Muhammad. Muslims claim that he accepted Islam in the last moment of his life when he was almost dying. Muhammad was trying hard to push him to accept Islam. Out of nine uncles, two became Muslims and out of six aunts, only one accepted Islam. These three individuals (the two uncles and one aunt) converted to Islam after losing the war against Muhammad. This is more proof that Muhammad was a false man.
And Muhammad men killed his uncle and torture him as we read:

It has been reported by Anas son of. Malik that the Messenger of Allah (Allah pray on him)said (after the encounter at Badr): Who will ascertain for us what has happened to Abu Jahl? Ibn Mas'ud went (to gather this information). He found that the two sons of 'Afra' had struck him and he lay cold at the point of death. He caught him by his beard and said: Art thou Abu Jahl? He said: is there anybody superior to the person you have killed, or its his people have killed him. Ibn Mas'ud says that, according to Abu Mijlaz, Abu Jahl said: I wish it was some on not a goat shepherd would have killed me. (Sahih Muslim Book 019, Hadith 4434,Book 32, Hadith 144)

And its reported that prophet of Islam was extremely happy for killing him.

As we read in Book of Tafsir Al-Qur'an by Imam Fakher AlDeen Al-Razi p 24 “Son of Massoud when he slit his ear and make thread in it and make dragged to the Messenger of Allah, peace be upon him and Jibril between his hands and he laughs, and says: 'O Muhammad authorized me(to laugh), but we got here his head with the ear, this is what been said in the killing of Abu Jahl”

Imagine how savage this action, specially if you learn that Abu Jahel, not only his father brother(his uncle) but he was the father of two men was married to Muhammad daughters.

We go back to the claim again; THE FACT IN HERE IS THAT THE VERSE ITSELF PRESENTS 2 BIG MISTAKES!

If somebody doesn't believe that Allah is their god, it doesn’t mean they are lying. They are being honest. What does this
have to do with lying? If Muhammad’s uncle didn't believe in Allah, he wasn't lying. It was just his belief, nothing more.

If a Hindu says to a Christian, "My god is not Christ," can anyone accuse him of lying? No, because this is what this Hindu believes in. Lying is saying something knowing it's not true. Why would Muhammad accuse his uncle of lying when his uncle honestly did not believe in Allah as God and Muhammad as a prophet?

If someone says, "I believe a Satan ate my food," (Like a jinn eating a Muslim’s food. The Muslims believe in jinns, who are considered to be creatures made of gas and fire. They even believe Satan have sex with their women) they are in essence not lying because this is something the person truly believes in. As foolish as it seems that someone would actually believe a spirit would eat their food in the first place, and that Satan would have sex with their women, it is still something they faithfully believe in. “ The messenger of Allah said: Do not eat with your left hand, for the Satan eats with his left hand. (Sahih Muslim, Book 023, Hadith 5007)

Also, the mistake in this verse is the word “forelock.” its a very foolish of themselves to make it a scientific miracle. Maybe you don’t know what I mean yet. In all Islamic translations of the Qur’an they are using the same word, forelock, so it must be that they all agree about the meaning of the word. They are out of their minds. Why?
Forelock means the following from all dictionaries:

(n. A lock of hair that grows from or falls on the forehead, especially the part of a horse's mane that falls forward between the ears.)

It's so dumb to say that hair is where our brain is. What science is talking about is the front of the brain, not the hair!!!



Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[2013]

Muslims’ claim
LOCUSTS MOVING IN SWARMS

They will emerge from their graves with downcast eyes, like swarming locusts. (Qur’an, 54:7)
This verse describes all people's situation in the Hereafter as one resembling swarming locusts. There is great wisdom in this simile.

A great deal of information was obtained about locusts in the twentieth century by conducting wide-ranging studies using micro-cameras. Locust swarms contain huge numbers of individual locusts that behave as a single body.

----------------------------------------------------

My answer
I am not sure if the one who made this claim is in good shape or not. No one knows that the locusts come in huge groups except Allah? This is really funny. At the same time, the verse says locusts scattered, not swarming.
The fact is that the Bible says something amazing; that is locusts move by biological control and other means of non-chemical control, which means they have no leader or a king or queen, and this is something that has just been found recently. We read this in the Bible:

Proverbs 30:27

The locusts have no king, yet go they forth all of them by bands;
The verse presents two facts. They move by bands or swarm which is not much of a secret and something anyone can notice. But without a king? Its in one of the bible books written between the tenth and sixth centuries B.C, This discovery took humans about 3,000 years to know?

Still, we do not see Christians making books about this scientific discovery in the Bible. We do not need science to prove God for he does not need their approval.
At the same time, maybe Mr. Harun can make a book about how LOCUSTS fly and are made of gold.

Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 55, Hadith 604 Allah’s Messenger said at the same time as Job was naked from taking a shower, a swarm of gold LOCUSTS fell on him, and he began collecting them in his dress. His Lord called him, 'O Job! Have I not made you rich enough to need what you see? He said, 'Yes, O Lord! However, I cannot discharge with your benefit

To read more visit this site:

www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/080508132545.htm



Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[2013]

Hapo pia hamna maneno ufalme wa Mungu ndiye Yesu mwenyewe, kama ulivyosema

How will Allah recognize the Muslims from non-Muslims?

Qur’an 2:134
therefore, We have nominated you a middle nation, that ye may be witnesses against mankind, and that the messenger may be a witness against you. And We have chosen the direction of the qiblah which you previously celebrated only that We might know him whom follower the messenger, from him who turn on his heels against (Allah) In truth. It was a hard trial with the exclusion of for those whom Allah guided. However, it was not Allah's goal that your faith should be in vain, for Allah is merciful to mankind.


Let us study this verse carefully and you will notice the following:
1. The Kaaba is not a holy place as Muslims claim or even as Allah himself claims in the Qur’an as we read in Yusuf Ali’s translation:

Qur’an 5:97
Allah made the Kaaba, the Sacred House, an asylum of security for men, as also the Sacred Months, the animals for offerings, and the garlands that mark them: That ye may know that Allah hath knowledge of what is in the heavens and on earth and that Allah is well acquainted with all things.

Because Allah made it a place of direction for one reason and that is to know who is a Muslim and who’s not.

2. As long as Allah made it for that reason which is to know who is a Muslim and who’s not, it then means that he is all knowledgeable which the Qur’an keeps talking about. If Allah is all-knowing, he doesn’t need to know who is a Muslim and who’s not a Muslim.

“ And We have chosen the direction of the qiblah which you previously celebrated only that We might know him whom follower the messenger, from him who turn on his heels against (Allah)”

3. As you see he is making it very clear “only that We might know” and notice he is saying we might know? So he might know and might not?

Why did Allah make the boys sleep in the cave for more than 309 years ?
This story is one more proof that Qur’an is a fairy tale story. Here, Allah tells the story of boys who refused to deny Allah and they ran away for their lives by hiding in the cave and Allah made them fall asleep for an unknown number of years!

So the question here is, why did Allah do this miraculous act? The answer is in the following verses:
So now after reading these verses together, Allah told us why he performed this amazing funny miracle.

Qur’an 18:9-14
9Or do you think that the boys of the cave and the Raqim (Name of a Valley) was of Our wonderful wonders.
10 when the youths searched for refuge in the cave, they said,: Our Lord! Grant us from yourself mercy from, and provide us a right guidance in our affair.
11So We blocked them from hearing in the cave for a number of years.
12Then We raised them up that We might know which of the two parties was most successfully able to calculate the time for which they remained.
13 We recount to you their story with the truth; surely, they were youths, which believed in their Lord, and We multiplied them in guidance. 14And We supported their hearts with patience, when they stood up and said,: Our Lord is the Lord of the heavens and of the earth; we will not call any as god besides Him, for then indeed we should have said a false thing.


“12Then We raised them up that We might know which of the two parties was most successfully able to calculate the time for which they remained.” (Qur’an 18:12)

1. Did Allah want to have some fun and see who is better in giving the most accurate number about how many years they slept?

2. Allah wanted to know? Yes as you see he said, “that We might know” so does that mean Allah will not know until he raises them and asks them? What makes sense is that if Allah already knows he will not have fun getting the correct answer. It is like watching a movie wherein he does not know and he cannot wait to see who of the three boys will give the most accurate number of years.

3. Again Allah uses the word “W e might know”. So what’s wrong with this Allah that even after they give the answer he still will not know. Or maybe because he does not know which is the correct answer anyway? Or can someone tell me what the phrase “We might know” stands for?

4. On the top of that, what did we learn from this silly story? Are we a bunch of kids being told bedtime stories by grandma?

5. In the same chapter, we read this:
Qur’an18:18
And you might think they were awake, even though they were asleep, and We made them turn over to the right and the left, their dog stretching forth his two fore-legs on the threshold: if you take a look at them, you would have certainly turned back from them in flight, and would definitely have been occupied with terror of

them.
6. I think the story is more exciting now for kids because Allah added a dog with the three boys! But we thought Allah hated the believers who own dogs?

As we read in this hadith:

Sahih Muslim, Book 010, Hadith 3810
Ibn 'Umar Allah blesses him reported: Allah's Messenger ordered to kill all dogs, and he sent Muslim men to the corners of the city of Medina in search for dogs to be killed.

7. Now Allah gives us a description on how the dog stretched his two legs. Remember, this is the god of Islam speaking every word. It should lead to wisdom. The funny and sad part is that Allah made an entire chapter about nothing while he only made one verse in the entire Qur’an about Christ’s crucifixion!

How many boys were there in the cave? When I say Qur’an is a joke I am not just insulting.



Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[2013]

Mbona gazeti lako halina mahali Yesu alipodai kuwa yeye ndiye Mungu? Walla hamna mahali alisema alijibandika nyama na kuwa binadamu,??

How to answer Muslims' claim about Bible corruption

There is an extremely important questions we must ask a Muslim when he accuses us of the corruption of our Book. First, remember that Muslims consider the Old and New Testament being the book of Allah.

_____________________________

Allah's words vs Allah's words?

• If the Qur'an, Torah, Gospel, and the book of Psalms all is his books, so why Allah do not want to protect his books but he favorers the Qur'an over the books of the bible?

This is an important question we demand answer for it from Muslim's!, however you will never find some one can answer such a a simple question.

Sahih International Translations
Qur'an 3:3
“He has sent down upon you, [O Muhammad], the Book in truth, confirming what was before it. And He revealed the Torah and the Gospel.”

• Do Allah like the Qur'an and hate the rest of his books
The Torah, and The Gospel?
• Is his Qur'an is better than his other books?
• If he will not protect all these books, and he is obviously

not interested in protecting his other books what is the point to send it?

__________________________________


Allah will make Qur'an better than his Qur'an?

The madness of Islam logic is endless in the coming verse we will see one of the most stupid statement can be made by some one claim be God!

Qur'an 2:106
“Whatever verse we abrogate or cause it to be forgotten except that We will make something better than it or similar to it. Do you not know that Allah is over all things competent?”

Please read this verse above carefully this is an extremely important verse, actually this verse alone is enough to make millions leave Islam is they got to understand it.

What we understand from the Qur'an verse above is;
1. Allah has miscellaneous quality if his own Qur'an.
2. There is bad verse's, and better ones.
3. But don't be worry Allah will make you forget the bad one and he will come with better one?
4. Its clear Allah maybe when he is in a bad mode his writing is not good and he produce bad text.
5. So he will go over It again and he will say to himself {oh no this is bad I better make something better, and make them forget how stupid the previous one, before mankind notice how foolish I am!}
6. Allah will make us forget the Qur'an is he going to forget it too?
7. If yes Allah can not be God if no so what is the point of making us forgetting the verses?
8. Can the Qur'an(the word of god) be destroyed?
9. Well according to this verse yes.
10. But this is mean Qur'an is not protected and Allah himself is the first to act destroying his own words.
11. Can Qur'an be forgotten?
12. The answer yes Allah he will make us forget his Qur'an.
13. Allah will make us lose memory when its come to the bad verse only!
14. By they way what is the bad verse's Allah cause us to forget?
15. Maybe the breastfeeding or suckling for an adult man by adult woman in Islam? But its not working we still remember it as well as Muslims.
◦ In this story we will read one of the most ridiculous teaching which one day was a verse in the Quran itself as an order from Allah to do.
“' A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Sahla bint Suhail came to Allah's Apostle (may peace be eupon him) and said:
Messengerof Allah, I see on the face of Abu Hudhaifa (signs of disgust) on entering of Salim (who is an ally) into (our house), whereupon Allah's prophet said: Suckle him. She said: How can I suckle him as he is a grown-up man? Allah's Messenger smiled and said: I know he is a grown-up man?'and the Messenger of Allah's laughed.” (Sahih Muslim, Book 17, Hadith 33)
16. This was one day a verse in the Qur'an but guess what the one made it gone is not Allah then who?

------__________________________-------
Even A Goat CAN EAT the words of Allah!

Is this true?

YES
“('A'isha) said:
There was revealed (verses) in the Holy Qur'an ten clear sucklings, and then another verses of five clear sucklings.”(Book 17, Hadith 31)

1. so the Qur'an use to have Tow verses;
1. one verse about Man should suckle an adult woman breast for Ten times( not in the same time like in one suckle till he is satisfied.

2. Then a new verse came from Allah to make Five times suckling instead of Ten.
3. However I will not about this stupid teaching much I will leave it for my coming book, but why we can't find these verses in the Qur'an we have to day?
4. The answer the Goat eat it!

Sunan Ibn Majah, Hadith 1944:
“Aisha said: 'the verse of stoning and of suckling an adult ten times was revealed, and they were on a paper kept
under my bed. When the Messenger of Allah dies and we were occupied by his death, a Goat entered and ate away the paper.'”

This story alone is showing us how crazy its to believe that Allah is the true God.

Now I am not done yet with this verse;

Qur'an 2:106
“Whatever verse we abrogate or cause it to be forgotten except that We will make something better than it or
similar to it. Do you not know that Allah is over all things competent?”

There is an important points I did not speak about in the this verse yet which is this part;

“Except that We will make something better than it or similar to it.”
Allah will cause us to forget a verse so he will make a verse is Similar to it???
That is really kind of mental disorder from Allah to say but do not Muslims and Qur'an claim that Allah is all wise? Let us think about it;

1. in the beginning we did ask questions about allah will abrogate or cause to forget verses because according to him(Allah) he will make something better.

2. But not in this case because he is saying “or to make verse which is similar of it”
3. if if its similar of the older verse so what is the point of making something similar?
4. Similar mean nothing real change and its not better but a twin of the old verse he would like us to forget?
5. Obviously there is no point here at all its foolish action.
6. So what is the secret behind this?
7. The answer is easy, Muhammad each time he try to recite a verse he told before he make mistakes, and its not the same as the one he claim to be reciting again by adding words or missing words.
8. To the point he had to come with such a verse as an excuse to explain why he forgot it.
9. And that explain why Muhammad told the Muslims if you remember Allah send him seven Qur'an, go back to page 59 to refresh your memory.


_________________________________

Was the Bible of Allah corrupted by his will or against his will?

When asked this question, a Muslim has to respond to one of two answers:
A) By Allah's will. This makes it Allah's fault. This puts Allah in partnership with Satan in doing an evil work. Actually, it makes Allah the devil himself as he arms Satan with strong tools used to deceive people with.

B) Against Allah’s will. This means it’s impossible for Allah to be God as he is too weak to protect a few pages of a book… his own book!

Either way, Allah is not fit for the job of being God.

Advice for Christians about debating Muslims
1. Remember, do not defend the Bible when a Muslim says your Bible is corrupted. The Muslim is talking about Allah's bible, not ours. Why would you defend a book that's not yours anyway?

2. If he says, “Your Bible is corrupted!” Answer this: “You mean the bible of Allah?” Be sure to make him answer with yes because it's an Allah’s book as stated in Qur’an 45:16, Qur’an 40:53, Qur’an 5:46, and Qur’an 57:27. You will then see that the Muslims would be shocked of how ridiculous his claim is. After all, he is trying to prove to you that his god got screwed up and his book was corrupted. For me, this book is not mine and this god is not mine. Why would I defend it? I simply agree with the Muslims that his god’s bible is corrupted by answering this: “You know what? I agree with you! Your Allah got screwed up and his book is corrupted!” Then you will silence the claim and he will try to change the topic.

3. Then ask the Muslim why couldn’t Allah protect his bible? He will not give you an answer but he will surely reply: “The Christians and the Jews corrupted the book.”

4. Ask him, “I would like to know who it is that destroyed your god's word. Can you give me a name for the one who beat the power and strength of your god Allah?”

Ha ha ha ha

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[2013]

Mbona gazeti lako halina mahali Yesu alipodai kuwa yeye ndiye Mungu? Walla hamna mahali alisema alijibandika nyama na kuwa binadamu,??

EVEN ALLAH MAKES SACRIFICES.!!!!

ٍميِظَع ٍحْبِذِبُهاَنْيَدَفَو

Qur’an 37:102, Yusuf Ali’s translation
102 Then, when (the son) reached (the age of) (serious) work with him, he said: "O my son! I see in vision that I offer thee in sacrifice: Now see what is thy view!" (The son) said: "O my father! Do as thou art commanded: thou will find me, if Allah so wills one practicing Patience and Constancy!" 103So when they had both submitted their wills (to Allah), and he had laid him prostrate on his forehead (for sacrifice), 104 We called out to him "O Abraham! 105 "Thou hast already fulfilled the vision!" - thus indeed do We reward those who do right. 106 For this was obviously a trial 107And We ransomed him with a momentous sacrifice:

This story proves that Allah Himself gives sacrifice and it is just proper that we should ask why! Let us study this chapter and we will notice many extreme mistakes.

1. First of all, Allah did not order Abraham to sacrifice his son at all. It was a dream: "O my son! I see in vision that I offer thee in sacrifice: Now see what is thy view!”

2. It was Abraham’s offer: “I offer thee in sacrifice”. It was not ordered by Allah.
3. Muslims sacrifice humans as an offer from themselves.

4. The verse shows a bad mistake on how Abraham made an offer from himself as the verse says that it was a trial: “For this was obviously a trial”.

5. This means that Allah made Abraham see this vision and it translated by Abraham mistakenly as it’s just a vision as it’s his own offering to Allah when it's Allah order.

6. This shows bad communication between Allah and his prophet. Therefore, Allah cannot be the real God. 7. Because Abraham thinks it's his offer and Allah thinks it's his order.

8. Abraham passes the trial but still Allah is in need of requesting the sacrifice.

9. Allah himself sent his offer.
10. Not only humans give offering to God, but God makes offering to God,
“And We ransomed him with a momentous sacrifice:”

11. God’s sacrifice is not from earth. It's from heaven.
12. Why didn’t Allah send a sacrifice of a ram from earth?
13. Do Allah breed rams in heaven?

14. Why did Allah call the ram م “Azeem” which means Great?

15. Why didn’t Allah ever call other living beings “Azeem”?
When you offer sacrifices to Allah, he helps you

“Why couldn’t their gods help them? Those who gave a sacrifice to other gods instead of Allah. It is because these gods are fake and are their inventions.( Qur'an 46: 28)

Let us read this verse carefully and see what Allah is trying to tell us:

1.The person who makes a sacrifice to a god other than Allah is seeking help from the wrong god.

2.Giving offerings is a way to get help and make Allah happy with you. Therefore, Allah loves sacrifices.
3. Making sacrifices is the same as paying the Islamic god. It’s not about giving a gift to someone you care about or love, but it’s a must to get his attention ().

4 .But this again means that the Muslims’ claim that sacrifices are not meant to cool down their god’s anger is false.Allah

5 .Allah, as Muhammad claimed, did not help those who didn’t offer him sacrifices. This angered Allah and not only did he not help them out but he made them lose war and their very lives for not giving him (Allah) any offerings.

Qur’an 22:37 - Muhammad H. Shakir’s There does not reach Allah their flesh nor their blood, but to Him is acceptable the guarding (against evil) on your part; thus has He made them subservient to you, that you may magnify Allah because He has guided you aright; and give good news to those who do good (to others).

1. This verse contradict Qur'an 5:27 where Allah accepted and the Ram of Abel’s and send fire to take it to heaven. “fire came down from the heaven and consumed his offering”

2. Shedding blood protects you against evil “but to Him is acceptable the guarding (against evil) on your part”
3. You make sacrifices to magnify Allah “thus has He made them subservient to you, that you may magnify Allah because He has guided you aright”

Now there are problems in this verse. Since it says Allah does not accept any kind of sacrifice offered to him, the story in Qur’an 3:183 would be a contradiction as the following verse states that Allah accepted the ram into heaven as he always have for each of his messengers.

Qur’an 3:183
Those who said,: Surely Allah took an oath from us that we should not believe in any messenger until he brings us an sacrifice which the fire consumes. Say: Indeed, there came to you messengers before me with clear evidence and with that which you requested; why then did you kill them if you are truthful?

And it’s a contradiction to the story of Abraham too: Qur’an 5:27
“Tell to them the true story of the two sons of Adam. Behold! they each provided a sacrifice (to Allah) but It was accepted from one, but not from the other. Then he said(Cain): “I will slay thee." (Allah) only doth accept of the sacrifice of those who are righteous.”

its clear that about not making sacrifices to pacify Allah’s anger or to seek his help, are absolutely false.
So I think we showed enough evidence proving that the Muslims claim, what is called Qur'an Scientific discoveries is nothing but fabrication either about not making sacrifices to pacify Allah’s anger or to seek his help, are absolutely false. Or

…............................................................................

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[2013]

Mbona gazeti lako halina mahali Yesu alipodai kuwa yeye ndiye Mungu? Walla hamna mahali alisema alijibandika nyama na kuwa binadamu,??

SAUDA AND MUHAMMAD
When Sauda had aged, was fat, and heavy in movement, Muhammad stopped coming to her in her night for sex! Sauda heard that Muhammad might divorce her for she is useless for bed. She couldn’t find any solution. She knew that at this age, and because she had no kids, no one would marry her. She talked to ‘Aisha and asked her for help, because she knew how powerful ‘Aisha was. Then'Aisha got an idea. We can find the reference concerning what ‘Aisha said in many locations. Here is one of them in Suanan Abu Dawood, Book of Nikah (sexual intercourse—which Muslims translate as marriage), p. 243, Hadith 2135:

Reported from ‘Aisha: “The prophet used to go and visit all of us each in her day and he had sexual intercourse with each woman in her day only!” (Look how fair he was. Remember that the one talking is 'Aisha. There's no way she will complain.)

SUNAN OF ABU DAWOOD


When Sauda aged and she felt or feared that the prophet might divorce her, she said, “Oh apostle of Allah, I give my day to'Aisha.” So the prophet accepted what Sauda said, and in this event Allah sent Qur’an 4:128:

If a wife fears lack of sexual attraction ( ازوشن)or abandonment on her husband’s part, there is no chide or reproach on them if they arrange a reconciliation settlement between themselves; and such settlement is best; even though men’s souls are changed by greed. But if you do good and seek protection by obeying Allah, God is all knowledgeable with all that ye do.

The funny word (Nshoze, ازوشن) is the same word used in Qur’an 4:34 which gives the man a reason for his wife-beating, but if the man did it, she has to let it go and do his wishes to please him!

Fateh Al-Bari Fe Shareh Sahih Al-Bukhari, 1986 printing, Publisher Al-Raian, p. 223:


“Sauda she said: I was afraid that the prophet might divorce her, because she was aged, so she said to him, ‘Do not divorce me and keep me as one of your wives and I give my day to 'Aisha as return!’ So the verse, Qur’an 4:128 revealed,” The hadith was narrated to by Jarer from Hisham, and Abu-Dawood, and it’s explained in Sahih Muslim.

Tafsir Ibn Kathir Beirut, Published in 2002, Vol. 2, p. 428:
Reported from Ibn 'Abass: “Sauda aged and she was afraid that the prophet might divorce her and she lose her position as a wife, and she knew how much the prophet loved ‘Aisha and he favor, she is special to him, so she gave her day to her (‘Aisha) and the prophet accepted”

Fakhr Ad-Din Al Razi, Al Tafsir Al Kaber (the big interpretation) on Qur’an 4:128:
The Prophet wanted to divorce Sauda bint Zam’a, but she offerd him to keep her on the condition that she would give up her day to 'Aisha, and he allowed that and he did not divorce her (Sauda).

The same story can be found in the Book of Mishkat Al Masabih, Vol. 2/966, No. 3237

Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 3, Book 48, Hadith 853:
...Sauda bint Zam'a gave her day and night (her sexual rights as wife) to ‘Aisha, the wife of the Prophet trying to be satisfied and please Allah's Apostle.

The Arabic hadith has a different number; 2454:


Why did Muhammad want to divorce this poor woman and stop sharing the bed with her? We may learn in Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol. 2, Book 26, Hadith 740:

Narrated ‘Aisha: “Sauda asked the Prophet to allow her to leave earlier at the night of Jam', and she Sauda was a fat and very slow woman. The Prophet granted her to leave.”

1. I can show more and more references about this story, but all, or a few, is more than enough to explain that Muhammad was never FAIR with his wives.

2. If the best man of Islam is not fair with his wives, can the other Muslims be?

3. The best man is a selfish man. He used this woman for years and years until she is old and fat, then he dumped her in his trash box!

4. Allah always makes chapters fit exactly with Muhammad's sexual lust and he's ready anytime to make it a holy order!

5. Muslims say that a Muslim man should always be fair with his wives, but then they threaten a woman with divorce for no fault other than her age and beauty. Is this fair?

6. Why didn't Allah say to him, “Shame on you to use this old woman when she was young and now you are humiliating her?”

7. Would any Muslim appreciate someone who would do the same as Muhammad did to their mother, sister or daughter?

8. How evil ‘Aisha was to jump into the coming opportunity to have more control of the house of Muhammad, which means the authority.

9. In the Qur’an, the verse is saying Allah is okay with women making agreements between each other. Was this for all Muslims or just for Muhammad? The fact is, it was only for Muhammad, as always! Was this really an agreement or was the poor old woman being forced into it only for the exchange of food and shelter?

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[2013]

Hapo pia hamna maneno ufalme wa Mungu ndiye Yesu mwenyewe, kama ulivyosema

There is a hint of mystery in some of the New Testament Sonship texts that suggests that even though the Gospel declaration of Jesus as the Son of God is clear, it is by no means universally accepted. A number of the characters in the Gospel accounts questioned Jesus’ identity as Son of God.

For example, immediately after God the Father announced Jesus to be his Son, the devil tempted Jesus with the repeated phrase, “If you are the Son of God…” (Matthew 4:3, 6).

People in the crowd watching Jesus’ crucifixion and seeking to insult him used the same phrase, “If you are the Son of God…” (Matthew 27:40).

The Jewish religious leaders who had said Jesus was blaspheming when he called himself the Son of God (Matthew 26:63-65), then joined the crowd in mocking him on the basis of that very claim (Matthew 27:43).

While these passages are not direct affirmations from Jesus or his apostles about Jesus’ identity as the Son of God, they indicate this identity was a flashpoint of controversy in the Gospel.

Why would Satan, the enemy of humankind, bait Jesus with this particular introduction, “If you are the Son of God…”? (also reported in Luke 4:3, 9).

Why did those who wanted to mock and insult Jesus while he was suffering on the cross taunt him with the same title?

It is important to note that in the Gospel, it is Satan and Jesus’ enemies who questioned—or denied—his Sonship. On the other hand, when Peter confessed that Jesus was the Son of God, Jesus said, “this was not revealed to you by man, but by my Father in heaven” (Matthew 16:17)

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[2013]

Hapo pia hamna maneno ufalme wa Mungu ndiye Yesu mwenyewe, kama ulivyosema

al-mut‘a (Prostitution)
Al-mut‘a is a special type of sexual Relation, where the man and woman mutually agree to a marital arrangement of a specified period of time (one hour, one day, one week, etc.).

It involves payment for the time together. Like Whore, prostitution.

type of marriage was practiced before Islām.


Quite often the children of al-mut‘a are attributed genealogically to their mother because the father was often just a passerby in the mother’s town. Contact between the father and the mother would often cease at the end of the contract, and the children would take the name of the mother and her tribe.

Muḥammad incorporated this practice into Islām, as shown in this verse: “...but such of them as ye have enjoyed, give them their hire as a lawful due...” (Q 4.24).


There is no mention of an abrogation of this verse that refers to al-mut‘a.


However, Sunnī Muslims believe that Muḥammad abrogated al-mut‘a.



The number of wives in al-mut‘a is not limited to four, as in a marriage.

When Ja‘far al-Ṣādiq was asked about the number of wives allowed in al-mut‘a, and if it was limited to four, he answered, “No, not even seventy.” In fact, he said that it was limitless. He advised another, “Marry a thousand of them.” And when al-Hādī was asked if there was a specific limit to the number of wives a man could have in al-mut‘a, he too answered that there was “no limit.”

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[2013]

Mbona gazeti lako halina mahali Yesu alipodai kuwa yeye ndiye Mungu? Walla hamna mahali alisema alijibandika nyama na kuwa binadamu,??

ALLAH A SLAVES OWNER.

Allah’s “Relationship” to his Creation.


Clearly, Allah is non-relational in all aspects, unless one considers the role of master and slave a sufficient relationship. After all, even a slave knows his master, whether he is harsh or kind. But in Islam nobody knows this Allah. Not withstanding this dilemma, some Muslims claim that they have a relationship with him. But, based on other foundational Islamic doctrines, it can be clearly deduced that such claims are illusions or wishful thinking. In the Qur’an, the sole purpose of the creation of man was to be Allah’s slave:

Surah 2:186, “…if my servants or my slaves ask you about me…”

Surah 14:31, “…command my slaves to establish regular prayers...”

Surah 15:42, saying to Satan “Certainly, you shall have no authority over my slaves…”

So, although Allah is not known or knowable in any intimate or personal way, he is accepted always as a “Master”.

This “Master”, having unlimited prerogatives, is to be obeyed, and is to be obeyed unilaterally. And if loved by his slaves, that would be unilateral also.

Therefore, we do not know him, nor can we know him. We cannot even know his character through his attributes and 99 names. He is, by definition, incomparable.

For instance, let us take the attribute “Merciful”. His mercy, his compassion, his forgiveness, etc., are all based on the central assumption that “… there is nothing like him....” Although positive sounding, and perhaps very comforting to the individual Muslim, in the end these are empty or void terms, for he and his attributes cannot be understood or perceived because, again, we hit the same dead-end, “… there is nothing like him....”

Since the mercy of man is not like the mercy of Allah, to compare or contrast the mercy of Allah to that of the mercy of a man would be to humanise or anthropomorphise him.

In turn, such a humanisation of Allah is ultimate “Kufr” (blasphemy) —for again, “… there is nothing like him…” in shape, form or character.
Yet, after labouring over the need not to humanise Allah or to divinise a man, the Qur’an singles out Muhammad, a mere man, to be the embodiment of the mercies of Allah, and has been further equated with the quality of “mercy” equivalent to that of Allah by a Qur’anic injunction, according to Surah, 21:107:
“And we have sent you (O Muhammad) not but as a mercy for all the worlds (Angels, Jinn and humans).”23

As well as, Surah 9:128,
“There has come unto you a messenger (Muhammad) from amongst yourselves. It grieves him that you should receive any injury or difficulty. He is anxious over you, for the believers, he is full of pity, kind, and merciful.”

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[mgen]

Huyo ni yesu hapo anajitangaza kuwa ni Mungu na amejibandika nyama ??

ahaa [emoji15] [emoji38] Ndio sababu baba yake fatuuû aligoma katahiriwa NYAMA ya govi lake daah [emoji15] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] kibuzi wee ni msomi wa kuzimu uliye fuzu [emoji15]

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[Gavana]

ahaa [emoji15] [emoji38] Ndio sababu baba yake fatuuû aligoma katahiriwa NYAMA ya govi lake daah [emoji15] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] [emoji38] kibuzi wee ni msomi wa kuzimu uliye fuzu [emoji15]

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

Ndio Yesu hapo anajitangaza kuwa ni Mungu aliyejitia nyama na kuwa binadamu??

 

[Gavana]

ALLAH A SLAVES OWNER.

Allah’s “Relationship” to his Creation.


Clearly, Allah is non-relational in all aspects, unless one considers the role of master and slave a sufficient relationship. After all, even a slave knows his master, whether he is harsh or kind. But in Islam nobody knows this Allah. Not withstanding this dilemma, some Muslims claim that they have a relationship with him. But, based on other foundational Islamic doctrines, it can be clearly deduced that such claims are illusions or wishful thinking. In the Qur’an, the sole purpose of the creation of man was to be Allah’s slave:

Surah 2:186, “…if my servants or my slaves ask you about me…”

Surah 14:31, “…command my slaves to establish regular prayers...”

Surah 15:42, saying to Satan “Certainly, you shall have no authority over my slaves…”

So, although Allah is not known or knowable in any intimate or personal way, he is accepted always as a “Master”.

This “Master”, having unlimited prerogatives, is to be obeyed, and is to be obeyed unilaterally. And if loved by his slaves, that would be unilateral also.

Therefore, we do not know him, nor can we know him. We cannot even know his character through his attributes and 99 names. He is, by definition, incomparable.

For instance, let us take the attribute “Merciful”. His mercy, his compassion, his forgiveness, etc., are all based on the central assumption that “… there is nothing like him....” Although positive sounding, and perhaps very comforting to the individual Muslim, in the end these are empty or void terms, for he and his attributes cannot be understood or perceived because, again, we hit the same dead-end, “… there is nothing like him....”

Since the mercy of man is not like the mercy of Allah, to compare or contrast the mercy of Allah to that of the mercy of a man would be to humanise or anthropomorphise him.

In turn, such a humanisation of Allah is ultimate “Kufr” (blasphemy) —for again, “… there is nothing like him…” in shape, form or character.
Yet, after labouring over the need not to humanise Allah or to divinise a man, the Qur’an singles out Muhammad, a mere man, to be the embodiment of the mercies of Allah, and has been further equated with the quality of “mercy” equivalent to that of Allah by a Qur’anic injunction, according to Surah, 21:107:
“And we have sent you (O Muhammad) not but as a mercy for all the worlds (Angels, Jinn and humans).”23

As well as, Surah 9:128,
“There has come unto you a messenger (Muhammad) from amongst yourselves. It grieves him that you should receive any injury or difficulty. He is anxious over you, for the believers, he is full of pity, kind, and merciful.”

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

Yesu hapo ndio amedai kuwa yeye ni Mungu aliyejitia nyama na kuwa binadamu??

 

[Gavana]

al-mut‘a (Prostitution)
Al-mut‘a is a special type of sexual Relation, where the man and woman mutually agree to a marital arrangement of a specified period of time (one hour, one day, one week, etc.).

It involves payment for the time together. Like Whore, prostitution.

type of marriage was practiced before Islām.


Quite often the children of al-mut‘a are attributed genealogically to their mother because the father was often just a passerby in the mother’s town. Contact between the father and the mother would often cease at the end of the contract, and the children would take the name of the mother and her tribe.

Muḥammad incorporated this practice into Islām, as shown in this verse: “...but such of them as ye have enjoyed, give them their hire as a lawful due...” (Q 4.24).


There is no mention of an abrogation of this verse that refers to al-mut‘a.


However, Sunnī Muslims believe that Muḥammad abrogated al-mut‘a.



The number of wives in al-mut‘a is not limited to four, as in a marriage.

When Ja‘far al-Ṣādiq was asked about the number of wives allowed in al-mut‘a, and if it was limited to four, he answered, “No, not even seventy.” In fact, he said that it was limitless. He advised another, “Marry a thousand of them.” And when al-Hādī was asked if there was a specific limit to the number of wives a man could have in al-mut‘a, he too answered that there was “no limit.”

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

Al mutaa ndiyo Yesu mwenyewe hapo ??

 

[2013]

Al mutaa ndiyo Yesu mwenyewe hapo ??

Sacrifice in Islam

Why do Muslims practice such act? I will show you a Muslim’s demonstrations and claims.
Islam, My Only Choice
by Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din
Founder of the Woking Muslim Mission, England, and ‘The Islamic Review’
in Chapter 2
The author of the book said:

Muslims do observe sacrifice, but not to appease Divine wrath. One of the objects is to “Feed the poor man who is contented, and the beggar” (22:36). This institution also supplies an occasion for being benevolent to others, and it is a symbol of the religion of God; as the Qur’an says, we have to submit to His will as the animals under the knife have to submit to ours. And then a verse on the subject in the following thundering words denudes sacrifices of the merits that had been attached to them by other religions - such as the propitiation of Divine anger:

“Not their flesh, nor their blood, reaches God, but to Him is acceptable the guarding (against evil) on your part; thus has He made them subservient to you, that you may magnify God because He has guided you aright; and give good news to those who do good (to others).” (22:37)
Islam, My Only Choice

End of quotation

…...............................................

Is this true? Let us find out:

The author said: “Muslims do observe sacrifice, but not to appease Divine wrath.”

to “Feed the poor man who is contented, and the beggar” (22:36)

…...............

That statement is based on deception. In fact Islam has at least five kind of sacrifice;

1. Allah asking Abraham for human sacrifice(his son). (Qur'an 73:102).
2. Allah himself giving great sacrifice as ransom for Abraham son,(Qur'an 73:107).
3. Muslims seek forgiveness by giving sacrifices for individual or for the sake of other family member or for forgiveness of all Muslims as one nation, as we read in Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaemeen he said: in the book AlSharh AlMumtie’ (5/275) we quot; “There is no limit to how many people may share in the reward. The Prophet offered a sacrifice on behalf of his entire muslim nation” or in Al-Tirmidhi (hadith 1505).

4. Muslim sacrifice himself for the sake of Allah to get into paradise as we read; Volume 5, Book 59, Number 600: “Narrated by Mujahid: I said to Ibn 'Umar, "I want to migrate to Al-Sham." He said, "There is no migration, but Jihad for the sake of Allah. Go and sacrifice yourself for Jihad, and if you find an opportunity for Jihad (stay there) otherwise, come back."

Qur'an 2:244 “And fight in the cause of Allah and know that Allah is Hearing and Knowing.”
Qur'an 4:74 “So let those fight in the cause of Allah who sacrifices the life of this world for the Hereafter, And he who fights in the cause of Allah and might be killed or achieves victory - We eventually grant him a magnificent reward.”

5. Muslim sacrifice you for the sake of making his God happy so he can go to haven by killing whomsoever do no't accept Islam. Qur'an 9:29 “Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day”

Allah severe penalty can be avoided by sacrifice
Qur’an 3:183 “Those who said,: Surely Allah took an oath from us that we should not believe in any messenger until he brings us an sacrifice which the fire consumes. Say: Indeed, there came to you messengers before me with clear evidence and with that which you requested; why then did you kill them if you are truthful”


it translates to sacrifices. Now in Qur’an 3:183, we would notice few important things.
1. Allah first told the Jews not to accept any prophet unless he provides sacrifices and then Allah accepted these sacrifices by sending fire (holy fire!) from Heavens.

2. Allah approved what the Jews said and eventually he sent the fire to consume the sacrifices.
3. The Jews killed the prophets who provided signs! (Notice in here how foolish this argument is. The Jews will not accept a person for prophet-hood unless this person makes sacrifices and Allah sends a fire to consume it yet the Jews killed him?! Why they will do if he did whatsoever they asked for?

4. Why couldn’t the Qur’an provide a name of one of the prophet-hood that was killed after giving an offering to which Allah then sends his holy fire to consume the sacrifices?

5. And the most important question: why didn’t Muhammad make a sacrifice to which Allah would send his fire and consume it since Allah ordered not ever to accept a prophet among the prophet-hood unless he provides with a sign?

6. Therefore, the Jews had every right to reject Muhammad because he fail to provide such a significant sign.

7. Based on that rule, did the Jews behave inappropriately by following Allah’s commands?

8. What's wrong with this god Allah? You become a criminal even when you do his will.
The author of the book said:
“Muslims do observe sacrifice, but not to appease Divine wrath.”

to “Feed the poor man who is contented, and the beggar” (Qur’an 22:36)
1. Was the fire a homeless fire?
2. Hungry fire?
3. Homeless hungry fire coming from heaven?
4. Even in heaven there is homelessness!

For sure now it’s clear that Muslims cannot accept a homeless fire! They will say this is made to be a significant sign in order to prove the prophet-hood of a person. This was done once which means it was only done to perform and examine. It was not an act practiced to seek forgiveness.

Therefore, its time to show more proof that all of these sacrifices in Islam were not made as signs but as a practice.

Qur’an 5:27
Tell to them the true story of the two sons of Adam. Behold! they each provided a sacrifice (to Allah) but It was accepted from one, but not from the other. Then he said(Cain): “I will slay thee." (Allah) only doth accept of the sacrifice of those who are righteous.

Interpretation of AL-Zama'khshary

“Adam has tow sons from his seeds, so Allah inspired Adam to make each one of the boys marry his twin sister. And the twin sister of Able was more beautiful which made Cain jealous. Therefore Adam said: each one of you, make a sacrifice to Allah; the one whose sacrifice is accepted by Allah, will marry her.”

Tafsir (interpretation) of Al-Jalalayn Qur’an 5:27
In addition to recite, O Muhammad, to your community the account of the two male children of Adam, Abel and Cain, how both and each one of them offered a sacrifice to Allah. In the case of Abel was a male sheep (a ram), and in the case of Cain were green crops. One of both offerings was accepted, namely Able’s, when a fire came down from heaven and consumed his offering (the ram). Cain’s offering not being accepted, he became angry and undisclosed his jealousy until Adam left on pilgrimage. Cain said to him (Abel): ‘I will certainly murder you,’ and Abel replied, Why?, to which Cain responded: ‘Because your offering was exclusively accepted’. Abel said: Allah only accepts offerings from god-fearing witnesses.



So what we understand from this story according to Muhammad is:

1.Adam is a prophet inspired by Allah in finding solutions to everyday life problems.

2.Sacrifices were given to fulfill a request, in order to receive an answer and a blessing as an approval from Allah. 3."(Allah) doth accept of the sacrifice of those who are righteous.

4.Allah only accepts sacrifices from righteous men as all Muslims are righteous.
5 .The fact is that you can offer a sacrifice on behalf of someone else, as stated in the hadith of Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 6, Hadith 293:

Allah's Messenger sacrificed some cows on behalf of his wives.

6.Sacrifices started taking place from the time of Adam, as Islam copied from the Bible.
Genesis 4:3 - KJV
And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the LORD.4 And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering: 5 But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell.

7. Therefor it’s not about feeding the poor at all. Allah is not hungry or homeless, is he?, Allah took the sacrifices into himself.

8. Why is it that in Islam, Allah never accepted any sacrifices but rams?
9.Clearly, Allah is not a vegetarian. Why has he always requested blood sacrifices but not green crops as Cain did?

10. Christians believe that the sacrifices performed in the Bible represent the coming of Christ where Jesus Christ shed his blood, Him being the ultimate sacrifice in behalf of all human kind. He is the unblemished and spotless lamb sacrificed for mankind.

11.In Islam, what does the bloodshed of a ram as a sacrifice represent for Allah?

12.Allah made his decision about the marriage of Abel and his twin sister on what basis?

13.Both sons gave offerings to Allah, therefore both were equally good men in seeking Allah’s approval.
14 .However, it's clear that the ram and only the ram was acceptable before Allah. We will prove that with more evidence.


This hadith (Muhammad’s speech) is very clear:
“ Moreover, if anyone of you is sick or has a skin illness of his head, and must shave, He must pay money and either fast or feed the poor, or offer a sacrifice.”
(Qur’an 2:196, Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 59, hadith 504)

1. All the above actions are needed to recover from sickness.

2. A Muslim must pay money, and either fast or feed the poor, or offer a sacrifice.

3. Each offering is not that same as other offering, as you see Muhammad says (or).
4. So there’s a clear distinction between feeding the poor and offering a sacrifice.
5. This means that sickness in Islam is a result of Allah’s anger. You therefore need to remove Allah’s anger on you if you want to be healed from the sickness.

"(Allah) doth accept of the sacrifice of those who are righteous.

Qur’an 66:4-5
4 If yet both of you repent to Allah, your hearts will indeed incline. However, if ye back eachother against Muhammad, truly Allah is his Protector, and Jibrel (Gabriel), and every righteous one among those who believe, and the angels will support him.
5It will possibly be, if he divorces all of you, that Allah will award him better consorts in exchange of you, they who submit their will, who are Muslims, who are devout, who turn to Allah in repentance, who worship (in humility), who travel and fast,- previously married or virgins.

These verses give us a clear understanding that Muhammad’s wives are not righteous. Even the Qur’an considers them as “kufar” and disbelievers as if they were Muhammad's enemies to the point that Muhammad needs Allah, the angels and every righteous Muslim to back him up. Therefore, how and why did Muhammad offer a sacrifice on behalf of his bad wives while at the same time, Allah asks Muslims not to make a sacrifice on anybody’s behalf?

Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 6, Hadith 293 “Allah’s Messenger sacrificed some cows on behalf of his wives.”

Basically it means that my own good action brought the other person a reward! In this case, what happens to this verse: Qur’an 6:164
Say: What! Shall I look for a Lord another one then Allah? And He is the Lord of all things; and no soul does evil but against itself, and no bearer of burden shall bear the burden of another; then to your Lord is your return for judgment, afterwords He will be the judge between you in your arguments.

Qur’an 2:48
Protect yourself from that day (Day of Judgment) when no soul can be useful to another soul and no intercession will be accepted, and no help will come from anyone.

We previously saw Allah giving a sacrifice on behalf of Abraham but in that case, was it for the forgiveness of Abraham’s sin or was it about something else? Does Muhammad himself even know? In the last hadith, Muhammad sacrificed a cow on behalf of his wives as an intercession. Can this be an evident proof for the Christian faith that Jesus Christ sacrificed Himself on behalf of all mankind as a pure loving gesture in order for us to be forgiven? As we saw, Muhammad himself practiced the act of sacrificing on behalf of his wives! The most important difference I see between Christ’s sacrifice and Muhammad’s is that Jesus did so for the entire world whereas Muhammad did so for himself, being a person who only thought about his own house, and not others.

________________________________


Sacrifices of blood is a must in Mecca pilgrimage to complete Allah requirements

Qur'an 2:196
“And complete the pilgrimage(you Muslims) . But if you are detained, then offer what can be obtained with ease of sacrificial animals. And do not shave your heads until the sacrificial animal has reached its place of slaughter.



Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[2013]

Al mutaa ndiyo Yesu mwenyewe hapo ??

Titles of Egyptian Rulers in the Qur’an

http://www.harunyahya.com/musa12.php

In contrast, the ruler at Moses' time is referred to as the "Pharaoh":

"We gave Moses nine Clear Signs. Ask the tribe of Israel about when he came to them and Pharaoh said, to him, 'Moses, I think you are bewitched.'"
(The Qur’an, 17:101)}

The rulers of the old dynasty did not use the title. The use of the word pharaoh as the title of the ruler did not start until the "New Kingdom" era of Egyptian history. This period started with the 18th dynasty (1539-1292 BC), and by the 20th dynasty (945-730 BC) the word "pharaoh" was adopted as title of respect.

------------------------------------------------

My answer
The point he is saying here is how Allah knew that the one who ruled at the time of Moses had the title of Pharaoh and the one who ruled at the time of Joseph had the title of King!

1. Muhammad copied the story from the Bible. The word king in the time of Joseph is mentioned in the Bible.

Genesis 39:20
And Joseph’s master took him, and put him into the prison, a place where the king's prisoners were bound: and he was there in the prison.

2. The word Pharaoh was used in the time of Joseph and even 300 to 400 years before the time of Joseph. The claim that the word Pharaoh was not used until the 20thdynasty (945-730 BC) is not true. You can search yourself for The pharaohs of Dynasty XVIII who ruled for about 250 years (him and 1550-1298 BC)

3. Muslims themselves believe that Yusuf (Joseph) lived between 1610 BC - 1500 BC. Mr. Harun Yahya said in his writing that “This period started with the 18th dynasty (1539-1292 BC)”, which are false dates. Even that is enough to prove that his claim is false.

4. What's funny is that Muslims think he lived between 1610 to 1500 BC which would mean Joseph lived under the rule of more than one king and was living at the time of the pharaohs as the dates are displayed in Harun Yahya's claim.

5. Pharaoh is a word that originally meant the great house. Let’s just say that the one who lived in it had the name as owner of the house.

6. Also, in the new kingdom of Egypt, by the year 1479-1425 BC, it became a title and/or name for whoever was the king, but in general that means the name became more adopted in this way. The fact is that even the word Pharaoh was used long before that for the kings, but it was not used often. Later it turned into a custom.

7. This can be proven from many books. As an example, the King Amenhotep IV ruled for 17 years and was called Pharaoh as a title. That was in the years of 1352-1336 B.C. 18th dynasty, during his lifetime.

References
Kuhrt 1995: 186

Christopher Bronk Ramsey et al., Radiocarbon-Based Chronology for Dynastic Egypt, Science 18 June 2010: Vol. 328. no. 5985, pp. 1554-1557.

Aidan Dodson, Dyan Hilton: The Complete Royal Families of Ancient Egypt. The American University in Cairo Press, London 2004.

8. All this being said, we have enough proof concerning the false claims made by the Muslims.
9. To make my final point, I will show something that Muhammad said which proves that Islam and the Qur’an consider the Pharaoh as a name of a man and not a title based on the coming hadith.

1Islam and the Qur’an consider the Pharaoh as a name of a man, not a title.

Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 57, Hadith 113; (in Arabic: Hadith 3558).
Narrated Abu Musa AL Ash'ari: Allah’s Prophet said, “Many amongst men reached perfection but amongst women none reached the perfection except Mary, the daughter of 'Mran and Asiah (Asieya), the woman of Pharaoh. And the superiority of 'Aisha to other women is like flavoring the meat over other dishes.



10. Notice here that Muhammad is using the name of Asieya, wife of Pharaoh, not of The Pharaoh! This is clear evidence that according to Muhammad and Allah, Pharaoh is a name of a man, not a title.this is why it shows in the Qur'an 74 time but no name of that king or the word king for the Pharaoh appear.

11. We have very clear proof, if Pharaoh was a title in the Qur’an why he is counted with individual names as we read in; Qur'an29:32 And [We destroyed] Qarun and Pharaoh and Haman. And Moses had already come to them with clear evidences, and they were arrogant in the land, but they were not outrunners [of Our punishment].( Sahih International translation. 1) As we see he is counting names so if Pharaoh is a

title it shouldn't be there, if we replace the word Pharaoh with the meaning of it(King) then the verse will look funny which already is because that will give the true meaning of the verse, “And [We destroyed] Qarun and k i n g and Haman, And Moses”

2) obviously he is counting names of individuals, and the word king dose not fit there unless he thought its a name.

3) Qur'an 38:12 “ The people of Noah denied before them, and [the people of] 'Aad and Pharaoh, the owner of stakes”
Again Noah, 'Aad, Pharaoh, there are individuals especially if we notice that the other two names are not even kings.


12. muhammad said;
“women none reached the perfection except Mary, the daughter of 'Mran and Asiah (Asieya), the woman of Pharaoh.” ,so we notice here:
1) Daughter of 'Mran.
2) Wife of Pharaoh.
3) To say that it can be fine, if this statement made in the time of Pharaoh, but to say the wife of Pharaoh thousands of years after many Pharaoh died already, how we will know which wife of which Pharaohs she was, the word Pharaoh makes reference to various pharaohs (kings of Egypt)?
4) Unless he thought Pharaoh is a name of a person, and there is only on Pharaoh, Qur'an (8:52) “Same as the custom of the people of Pharaoh and of those before them. They disbelieved in the signs of Allah” 5) Qur'an “And a believing man from the family of Pharaoh who concealed his faith said, "Do you kill a man “ so he is from the Family of Pharaoh? Family of a king? Which king!

I think the answer is clear, that the word Pharaoh in the Qur'an used as a name of a person not as a king which is an error not the opposite.

---------------------------------------------

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[2013]

Yesu hapo ndio amedai kuwa yeye ni Mungu aliyejitia nyama na kuwa binadamu??

IF WE DON'T COMMIT SIN, ALLAH WILL KILL US.

Sahih Muslim, Book 037, Hadith 6622 Abu Huraira stated that the Messenger of Allah (may Allah pray on him and salute him) said, “By Him, which in his Hand is my life, if you mankind were not to commit sin, Allah would sweep you out of the world, and He would exchange you with people who would perform sin and seek forgiveness from Allah, and He then would forgive them.”

Allah will kill only those who do not commit sins. This is a clear proof that the Qur’an copied the Biblical story of Noah’s flood and inserted as Qur’an 11:40–44.

The Biblical story speaks about God destroying the “bad ones” and rescuing the good people. However, what we read from the above hadith is Allah doing the opposite. This goes against the logic of punishment and reward, or punishment given exclusively to the bad individuals, as we read the following Qur’anic verse:

Qur’an 11:44
“And it was said: O earth! Swallow up your water and to the sky Be. Clear your clouds, And the water was made to sink and the judgment was completed, and it (Noah’s ship) came to rest upon A-Judi, and it was said: A far elimination for the wrongdoing folk.”

At the same time, it’s a contradiction to the story of Lot who is considered a prophet of Islam. According to Lot’s story, Allah made rocks rain on his people (Lot’s) as a punishment for their sins, as we read in Qur’an 15:59-74.

This story was also taken from the Bible with Muhammad’s own fabricated tale added to it. If we go to the Bible in the Book of Genesis 18:26, we would notice that the God of the Christians and the Jews is willing to refrain from His punishment even if there were only 50 righteous people in the entire city. Whereas the god of Islam, according to the above hadith of Sahih Muslim, Book 037, Hadith 6622, “Allah then would kill all the good ones and replace them with bad ones.” Read with me the following Biblical verse:

Genesis 18:26 - KJV
“And the LORD said, If I find in Sodom fifty righteous within the city, then I will spare all the place for their sakes.”

From reading the above hadith, we can gather the following ideas and understand the mentality and nature of Allah – how he thinks, what he wants and seeks, what cheers him up, and what angers him:

1. Allah needs our sins.

2. Our sins bring Allah joy and he rejoices when we ask for forgiveness.

3. Allah would not hesitate to punish us by death if we had not sinned, or, if we had not given him joy by asking him for forgiveness of our sins.

4. Deception is one of Allah’s tools, which is the same tool that Satan uses. In order for Allah to deceive us, he plays the game of good cop bad cop, wherein he’s the good guy and we’re the bad guys. It constitutes of us chasing him by begging for his forgiveness and him causing us to sin, repeating the whole scenario over and over again. This is how Allah enjoys this world and rewards himself: by causing disorder and deception so that we would try to please him by asking for forgiveness.

5. The God that we have as Christians did not create us to make us ask for forgiveness, but He created us to share His glory with us. This is why we’ve been taught to refer and talk to Him as “our Father.” Our Father is the opposite of the god of Islam. He would not wipe us off if we did not commit sins just so He could replace us with a sinful community. It’s never been about His needs but it’s all about Him loving us and inviting each individual to have a personal relationship with Him.

John 3:16 - KJV
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

In conclusion, Allah is literally a sick god suffering from low self-esteem symptoms. He is moody, unpredictable, and is filled with anger. No one can or could understand him. He does things based on his selfishness and egotistical interests. We are victims of his deception, which for me is a clear observation that he is nothing but Satan hiding behind the name Allah

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[2013]

Yesu hapo ndio amedai kuwa yeye ni Mungu aliyejitia nyama na kuwa binadamu??

FINALLY, THE PLAN OF ALLAH TO DECEIVE THE CHRISTIANS.

Qur'an 4:14 Yusuf Ali translations
“14 From those, too, who call themselves Christians, We did take a covenant, but they forgot a good part of the message that was sent them: so we estranged them, with enmity and hatred between the one and the other, to the day of judgment. And soon will Allah show them what it is they have done”

In order to make me hate my brother in Christ, you would have to deceive me because that is an evil thing to do. But why is it that Allah hates the Christians so much?

John 15:18-27King James Version (KJV)
“18 If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you.
19 If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.”

Revelation 12:9King James Version (KJV)
9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

We end the topic of Allah deceptions with this verse translated by Muslims:
Qur'an 4:14 Muhsin Khan
And We sent not a Messenger except with the language of his people, in order that he might make (the Message) clear for them. Then Allah misleads whom He wills and guides whom He wills. And He is the All-Mighty, the All-Wise.

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[mgen]

1.Kwanza umekubali kuwa mtume au nabii anaweza kuuliwa na watu waovu, tatizo lako ni kuwa Mohamadi alisema kuwa hawawezi kumdhuru , na ni kweli amekula chakula chenye sumu na wala aijamuua , labda utuambie Mohamadi baada ya kunywa sumu alikaa miaka mingapi bila kufa ?

Usipitilize mahaba kwenye deen ya warabu ili uonekane na wee umo [emoji15] [emoji12] baba yake kasimu anafunguka kinacho muua ni sumu Aliyo wekewa na mbuguma wa Kiyahudi [emoji117]

wee unabweka SIVYO [emoji12] HAKIKA kwa mahaba uliyo Nayo kwa deen ya warabu Hata aje Leo mudi aseme sikuja kwa ajili yako utambishia [emoji15]

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[2013]

Yesu hapo ndio amedai kuwa yeye ni Mungu aliyejitia nyama na kuwa binadamu??

ISLAM AND THE RACISM

If Muhammad is the universal prophet for all of mankind, then Muslims should explain why their prophet considers the black Africans as trouble makers that even the sky and earth are disgusted with their (black Africans) behaviors and voices. Let us loot at references from Muhammad’s own words.

1Muhammad’s prophecy towards the black people

The book of Kanz al-'Ummal by Alî Muttaqî al-Hindî, vol. 11, p. 177.
31117 - Narrated by Ibn Abbas from the prophet that Noah said, “don't be happy that you brought the sons of Ham they are cursed by Noah, peace upon him, I swear by him whom my soul in his hand, I see them (the black ones) as nothing but the Devils traveled between the flags of Tribulations, they have unclear voices in their chest, and the voice of a zebra, storms blow because of their act and the earth is troubled because of their acts, they have no respect to my own people and to my religion, the one who reached that time, they should cry on Islam if they can cry.”


Tabari, Vol. 2:21 – The Ham offsprings (Africans) are all those black and curly-haired, while the Japheth offsprings (Turks) are all those who are full-faced with small eyes, and the Shem offsprings (Arabs) are those who have handsome faces with beautiful hair. Noah prayed that the hair of Ham’s descendants would not grow beyond their ears, and that whenever his lineage meet the children of Shem, the succeeding would enslave them.

Sahih Muslim, Book 041, Hadith 6959 Abu Huraira reported Allah’s ambassador (may Allah pray on him and salute him) his statement The Last Hour would not come until the Muslims fight with the Turks- people whose faces would be like hammered shields wearing shoes made of hair.


Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 56, Hadith 787 Arabic book Hadith 3394
Reported Abu Huraira: that Allah’s Messenger said, “Judgment Day will not be demonstrated until you fight a nation wearing shoes made from hair and until you fight the Turks who will have small eyes, red faces and flat noses; and their faces will be like level shields. And you will find that the best people are those who hate the obligation to fight them most of all, until they are chosen to fight. And the people are of different natures: The best of the people who were before the Islamic period were the best ones in Islam also. A time will come when any of you will love to see me instead of your families and wealth to be doubled.”

A'hkam Al-Qur’an, by Imam Al-Qur’tubi, print year 1999, Beirut Lebanon, Vol. 8, Chapter 9:49, pages 87, 88:

“Attack them [the Romans] so you can get the blond girls, so that Al-Jed said, to him [to the prophet] “do not practice sexual temptation on us”.

The prophet said to the people, who is your leader children of Salama? They said, Al-Jed Ibn Qais. But he is cheap and coward. The prophet said, and what is the solution for someone he is it cheap and coward? From today your leader is Bisher Ibn Al-Bar'a Ibn Ma'rror.



Actually, if we study the last hadith, we would find the evil side of Muhammad very obvious. He did not tell his men to fight the Kfar (unbelievers) who don't believe in Allah. He did not even say that the goal of the war is to make them believe in the true God. Instead, he used sexual temptation by saying that those who would attack with him will get the blond girls. And when one of the men (leader of his tribe) told Muhammad not to tempt them, exposing the true face of Muhammad, the latter did not hesitate to get rid of him and force a new leader on this tribe. Suddenly, the one refusing sexual temptations becomes a bad leader, a cheap leader, and a coward.

2. The Devil is black!

The one who will destroy the Kaaba is a black man from Ethiopia, before the Last Hour:
Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 26, Hadiths 661, 665, 666 Reported Ibn Abbas: The Prophet said, “As if I were watching him, a black person with skinny legs tearing out the stones of the Kaaba one after one.”

The same story can be found in Ibn Kathir’s interpretation and Sahih Al-Bukhari by following this link:

www.qtafsir.com/index.php?

option=com_content&task=view&id=301&Itemid=36




option=com_conten-task=view&id=301&Itemid=36


We would learn from the hadiths above the following: 1. It is so clear that Muhammad considers every black person ugly and evil to the point that even Satan himself is black and the one who will destroy the Kaaba is black too.

2. He described the Turkish people in a very degrading way. Not only did he mention their ethnic group but he also described their facial attributes and the clothes they wore. In case you do not know, the Turkish before can be called true. They were pure Asian nation.

3. Then we see Muhammad encouraging Muslims to fight the white blond to get the blond women, which meant that he loved the white race but only wanted from them the blond women. That explains why Muhammad promised his men that the Hoor (beautiful, white females with big black eyes), which Allah promises every Muslim in heaven, are going to be so white to the point they’ll be able to see through their bones.

3. No black individual, male nor female, will enter heaven.

Qur’an 55:72
“Hoor (beautiful, white females with big black eyes) jailed inside their tents.”
Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 54, Hadith 476 Reported Abu Huraira: “The Prophet said, ‘The first group (of Muslims) who will enter Paradise will be glittering like the full moon, and the batch next to them will be shining like the most brilliant star in the sky. Their hearts will be as if the heart of a single man of [as if they are one man], for they will have neither hatred nor jealousy among themselves; everyone will have two wives from the hooris, who will be so beautiful, pure, white and transparent to the point the marrow of the bones of their legs will be seen through their bones and their flesh.’”

1) Now, shouldn't we ask ourselves why Allah never promised black women for the Arab men in heaven? These are the reasons:

2)No black individual, male nor female, will enter heaven.

3) It's very obvious that Allah did not consider black women attractive. As a matter of fact, having black skin is a curse as in the Judgment Day, Allah says in the Qur’an that he will make all the Muslims white and all

infidels black, for it is a punishment in Islam to be black while it’s a reward to be white. As we see in:
Now you might ask yourself how did Muhammad come up with the word “Hooris or Hoor”? As long as Allah is the one who chose this word in the Qur’an, this word should then be unique, as what is found in heaven cannot be found on earth.


Qur’an 3:106 Mohsin Khan’s translation 106 “On the Day (i.e. the Day of Resurrection) when some faces will become white and some faces will become black; as for those whose faces will become black (to them will be said): ‘Did you reject Faith after accepting it? Then taste the torment (in Hell) for rejecting Faith.’”

Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 93, Hadith 589 Sahih Al-Bukhari, Book 60, Hadith 302, 303 Reported by Abu Huraira that the prophet said, “Allah revealed ‘I have prepared for my good servants (in heaven) as no eye has ever seen and no ear has ever heard and no

man can ever imagine’”.
The fact is that it is not. The promise of the Hooris is false as even the name itself have already existed even before the time o f I s l a m . T h i s c a n b e p r o v e d i n t h e b o o k o f Jame' Al Baiyan fe Tafsir Al Qur’an, Year 310, Islamic, Vol. 6, p. 451.

7128 “the Arabs called the women who live in villages and cities hooris for they are white”.
Below is the original text in Arabic for the above translation.


And that is why the promises of Allah fit with the mentality of the Bedouins in their condition, as He promises them to have no heat in the heaven.

Qur’an 77:41, Yusuf Ali’s translation
As to the Righteous, they shall be amidst (cool) shades and springs (of water).

Surely, if Muhammad was speaking to someone living in Alaska, he would not promise him cold. Or if Muhammad was speaking to Europeans, he wouldn’t promise them blond women but tanned ones. Therefore, Arabs always longed to have white women as no blond women existed in Arabia. Muhammad promised the Bedouin men blond women and what they miss in their lives. As showed to you earlier, he was encouraging the men to fight for them to get the blond women and then exaggerated the description of those hooris since he knew how much Arab men dream of having sex with white women. So he promised them women who are so white that they’ll even be able to see through the their bones, which is by the way very disgusting. Imagine yourself looking at an x-ray photo of a woman’s live body, seeing everything in it move like the blood running, the food being processed, and everything else.

Qur’an 3:106 Mohsin Khan’s translation

106 “On the Day (i.e. the Day of Resurrection) when some faces will become white and some faces will become black;”
Now I want to explain a little bit more about this chapter which speaks about faces turning black or white, because Muslims might try to fool you and say that it is just metaphorical. I will prove that it is not. Let’s read:

Tafsir Al-Baher Al-Mu'he't, Vol. 5, p. 148 The interpretation of the chapter of Yunis “Their faces would be black for reality not a metaphorical so it’s going to be the color black”.


And you can read more about this on the below link of Tafsir Ibn Kathir:
“ On the Day the Day of Resurrection) when some faces will become white and some faces will become black; as for those whose faces will become black (to these it will be said): "Did you reject faith after accepting it Then taste the torment in Hell fire? for rejecting Islam.'',And for those whose faces will become white, they will be in Allah's mercy (Going to Paradise), therein they shall dwell forever.)


Tafsir Ibn Kathir -> Surah Al-'Imran -> The Benefits of Brotherly Ties and Unity and the Consequence of Division on the Day of the Gathering

or visit this Islamic site

Later on, we will give further explanations on Qur’an 27:82 which is the story of the beast.



Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

 

[Kisoda2]

Kwa ajili ya mahaba yaliyo kupofua unaona Hata huu [emoji117] View attachment 984479View attachment 984484 sio Ushahidi kwamba wewe hii deen haikuhusu [emoji15]

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app

Hawezi kuja na jibu hapo.
Hii dini yao it is all about SEX, SEX,SEX. Unaruhuiwa kufanya mapenzi na yeyote kuanzaia mkeo mpaka mamako mzazi. Huko peponi ndio hatari kabisa.
Check hii halafu unambie huyu mungu asiyekuwa na kazi ila kumtetea Muhammad na dhambi yake ya UZINZI(Kibaya zaidi hiyo AYA kaikopi kutoka kwa Umar Ibn Khattab) halafu unatwambie Quran haina shaka na imekamilika.
Stone Kissers!! Be serious and wake up.

Hizi Aya Muhammad alifabricate baada ya kufumaniwa akifanaya mapenzi mtumwa wa kike. ndipo biff likaanza na wakeze. ili kujificha aibu akaja na upupu huu.

(Quran 66:4-5)

Arabic 66:4- إِن تَتُوبَآ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ فَقَدْ صَغَتْ قُلُوبُكُمَا ۖ وَإِن تَظَٰهَرَا عَلَيْهِ فَإِنَّ ٱللَّهَ هُوَ مَوْلَىٰهُ وَجِبْرِيلُ وَصَٰلِحُ ٱلْمُؤْمِنِينَ ۖ وَٱلْمَلَٰٓئِكَةُ بَعْدَ ذَٰلِكَ ظَهِيرٌ

Pickthall - If ye twain turn unto Allah repentant, (ye have cause to do so) for your hearts desired (the ban); and if ye aid one another against him (Muhammad) then lo! Allah, even He, is his Protecting Friend, and Gabriel and the righteous among the believers; and furthermore the angels are his helpers.

Sahih Intl - If you two [wives] repent to Allah, [it is best], for your hearts have deviated. But if you cooperate against him - then indeed Allah is his protector, and Gabriel and the righteous of the believers and the angels, moreover, are [his] assistants.

Yusuf Ali - If ye two turn in repentance to Him, your hearts are indeed so inclined; But if ye back up each other against him, truly Allah is his Protector, and Gabriel, and (every) righteous one among those who believe,- and furthermore, the angels - will back (him) up.

Arabic -66:5 عَسَىٰ رَبُّهُۥٓ إِن طَلَّقَكُنَّ أَن يُبْدِلَهُۥٓ أَزْوَٰجًا خَيْرًا مِّنكُنَّ مُسْلِمَٰتٍ مُّؤْمِنَٰتٍ قَٰنِتَٰتٍ تَٰٓئِبَٰتٍ عَٰبِدَٰتٍ سَٰٓئِحَٰتٍ ثَيِّبَٰتٍ وَأَبْكَارًا

Pickthall - It may happen that his Lord, if he divorce you, will give him in your stead wives better than you, submissive (to Allah), believing, pious, penitent, devout, inclined to fasting, widows and maids.

Sahih Intl - Perhaps his Lord, if he divorced you [all], would substitute for him wives better than you - submitting [to Allah], believing, devoutly obedient, repentant, worshiping, and traveling - [ones] previously married and virgins.

Yusuf Ali - It may be, if he divorced you (all), that Allah will give him in exchange consorts better than you,- who submit (their wills), who believe, who are devout, who turn to Allah in repentance, who worship (in humility), who travel (for Faith) and fast,- previously married or virgins.
=======
Hii ndiyo Hadith inaonyesha mtunzi wa aya 66:6 (UMAR Ibn Khattab)

Sahih al-Bukhari » Prophetic Commentary on the Qur'an (Tafseer of the Prophet (pbuh))

Narrated Anas:
`Umar said, "I agreed with Allah in three things," or said, "My Lord agreed with me in three things. I said, 'O Allah's Apostle! Would that you took the station of Abraham as a place of prayer(Ka'ba hiyo anasema).' I also said, 'O Allah's Apostle! Good and bad persons visit you! Would that you ordered the Mothers of the believers to cover themselves with veils.' So the Divine Verses of Al-Hijab (i.e. veiling of the women) were revealed. I came to know that the Prophet had blamed some of his wives so I entered upon them and said, 'You should either stop (troubling the Prophet ) or else Allah will give His Apostle better wives than you.' When I came to one of his wives, she said to me, 'O `Umar! Does Allah's Apostle haven't what he could advise his wives with, that you try to advise them?' " Thereupon Allah revealed:-- "It may be, if he divorced you (all) his Lord will give him instead of you, wives better than you Muslims (who submit to Allah).." (66.5)

حَدَّثَنَا مُسَدَّدٌ، عَنْ يَحْيَى بْنِ سَعِيدٍ، عَنْ حُمَيْدٍ، عَنْ أَنَسٍ، قَالَ قَالَ عُمَرُ وَافَقْتُ اللَّهَ فِي ثَلاَثٍ ـ أَوْ وَافَقَنِي رَبِّي فِي ثَلاَثٍ ـ قُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ، لَوِ اتَّخَذْتَ مَقَامَ إِبْرَاهِيمَ مُصَلًّى وَقُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ يَدْخُلُ عَلَيْكَ الْبَرُّ وَالْفَاجِرُ، فَلَوْ أَمَرْتَ أُمَّهَاتِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ بِالْحِجَابِ فَأَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ آيَةَ الْحِجَابِ قَالَ وَبَلَغَنِي مُعَاتَبَةُ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم بَعْضَ نِسَائِهِ، فَدَخَلْتُ عَلَيْهِنَّ قُلْتُ إِنِ انْتَهَيْتُنَّ أَوْ لَيُبَدِّلَنَّ اللَّهُ رَسُولَهُ صلى الله عليه وسلم خَيْرًا مِنْكُنَّ‏.‏ حَتَّى أَتَيْتُ إِحْدَى نِسَائِهِ، قَالَتْ يَا عُمَرُ، أَمَا فِي رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم مَا يَعِظُ نِسَاءَهُ حَتَّى تَعِظَهُنَّ أَنْتَ فَأَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ ‏{‏عَسَى رَبُّهُ إِنْ طَلَّقَكُنَّ أَنْ يُبَدِّلَهُ أَزْوَاجًا خَيْرًا مِنْكُنَّ مُسْلِمَاتٍ‏}‏ الآيَةَ‏.‏ وَقَالَ ابْنُ أَبِي مَرْيَمَ أَخْبَرَنَا يَحْيَى بْنُ أَيُّوبَ حَدَّثَنِي حُمَيْدٌ سَمِعْتُ أَنَسًا عَنْ عُمَرَ.

Nimepigia mistari uone hayo madini joto wanayojivunia hawa yametoka wapi(Ila kimburu matari mutoto ya mushahara atakwambia hakuna ubaya Allah kupewa ushauri)

Back to Sex topic. Huyu Allah hana kazi za kufanya zaidi na NGONO tuu?

Check na hii ya kumalizia siku aka jioni njema. Kama kuna mwanamke anafuatilia hapa tena wa kiisilamu anisamehe tu maana hamna namna endelea kupanua tuu.

Mwanamke kwenye Uislam ni chombo/Kiburudisho tu. hana tofauti na incubator ya mayai, leo tray tano kesho sita au unaiacha tu.

(7)Chapter: If anyone says Amin [during the Salat (prayer) at the end of the recitation of Surat Al-Fatiha]
(7)بَابُ إِذَا قَالَ أَحَدُكُمْ آمِينَ. وَالْمَلاَئِكَةُ فِي السَّمَاءِ، فَوَافَقَتْ إِحْدَاهُمَا الأُخْرَى، غُفِرَ لَهُ مَا تَقَدَّمَ مِنْ ذَنْبِهِ

Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "If a husband calls his wife to his bed (i.e. to have sexual relation) and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning."

حَدَّثَنَا مُسَدَّدٌ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو عَوَانَةَ، عَنِ الأَعْمَشِ، عَنْ أَبِي حَازِمٍ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ "‏ إِذَا دَعَا الرَّجُلُ امْرَأَتَهُ إِلَى فِرَاشِهِ فَأَبَتْ، فَبَاتَ غَضْبَانَ عَلَيْهَا، لَعَنَتْهَا الْمَلاَئِكَةُ حَتَّى تُصْبِحَ ‏"‏‏.‏ تَابَعَهُ شُعْبَةُ وَأَبُو حَمْزَةَ وَابْنُ دَاوُدَ وَأَبُو مُعَاوِيَةَ عَنِ الأَعْمَشِ‏.‏
Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 3237In-book reference : Book 59, Hadith 48USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 4, Book 54, Hadith 460


كتاب النكاح
16 The Book of Marriage

(20)Chapter: It is unlawful for the wife to refuse to come to her husband's bed
(20)باب تَحْرِيمِ امْتِنَاعِهَا مِنْ فِرَاشِ زَوْجِهَا ‏

Abu Huraira (Allah be pleased with him) reported Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) as saying:

By Him in Whose Hand is my life, when a man calls his wife to his bed, and she does not respond, the One Who is in the heaven is displeased with her until he (her husband) is pleased with her.

حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ أَبِي عُمَرَ، حَدَّثَنَا مَرْوَانُ، عَنْ يَزِيدَ، - يَعْنِي ابْنَ كَيْسَانَ - عَنْ أَبِي حَازِمٍ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ، قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ "‏ وَالَّذِي نَفْسِي بِيَدِهِ مَا مِنْ رَجُلٍ يَدْعُو امْرَأَتَهُ إِلَى فِرَاشِهَا فَتَأْبَى عَلَيْهِ إِلاَّ كَانَ الَّذِي فِي السَّمَاءِ سَاخِطًا عَلَيْهَا حَتَّى يَرْضَى عَنْهَا ‏"‏ ‏.
Reference : Sahih Muslim 1436 cIn-book reference : Book 16, Hadith 143USC-MSA web (English) reference : Book 8, Hadith 3367
Mpaka Allah naye anakasirika Duuuh!! - (Kwenye mkolezo mweusi)
Na verses/hadith kibao zinaonyesha kuwa Islam is all about SEX nothing more.
Kuanzaia hapa duniani hata huko peponi kwao ni NGONO tu.
Mbaya zaidi upendeleo ni kwa mwanaume tuu.
Hivi kwa akili yako kabisa unakubaliana kuwa utapewa wanawake 72? ikiwa mmoja tu hapa duniani anakukimbiza. Halafu kibaya zaidi inaonyesha wanawake wa kiisilamu wote makazi yao motoni kusubiri GAVANA akifa Allah akawachomoe 70 ampatie na nyongeza ya 2 houris- hawa ukiwaingila fasta Allah anarekibisha chombo kinarudi upyaaa.
Kama hiyo haitoshi anaongezewana vijana wakiume warembo(Naked young boys so white like pearl) wamuhudumie kama vijakazi.

Wake up Abduls and stop drinking Camel Urine!!
Come to Jesus, for your Salvation is has already been PAID in full!!