Njooni tujifunze Kingereza kwa kuandika na kuongea

[Foxhound]

Ok naomba nikuulize kwanini hapo kwenye is lost isiwe had lost? yani kuwe na change of tense?

Mkuu nimeona kosa langu sio is bali ni had

Kwasababu hiyo ni past perfect tense. Sisi wasomi wa zamani tushasahau, waweza nirekebisha mkuu! [emoji120]

Mwaka wa 16 huu tangu niondoke kwenye formal education, nishaanza kusahau!

 

[Mwalimu wa Zamu Tz]

What's up ma man, you wanna tak to me ma nigga.[emoji1][emoji1][emoji1][emoji1][emoji1][emoji1]

[emoji1]Yo sup nigga?! How are thngs goin over there dude?

 

[Superbug]

1. The pen is lost. You gave me that pen.

The pen which you gave me is lost


2. The pen had lost. You gave me that pen.

The pen which you gave me had lost.

Fafanua mkuu kwa faida ya wengi. Je are both correct?

 

[Mwalimu wa Zamu Tz]

Yo nigga, you good?

Yea ma men .. am gud !!hope you're doin well too?

 

[Foxhound]

1. The pen is lost. You gave me that pen.

The pen which you gave me is lost


2. The pen had lost. You gave me that pen.

The pen which you gave me had lost.

Kuna baadhi ya sentensi kama umetumia active and passive voice! Ila sahihi.

 

[Mokaze]

Has improved
Is improving

There is no "has improved" rather there is "is improved", meaning; (kiingereza chako) kimekuwa bora/kizuri.

"Is improving" not the same as "has improved".

Eg, The machine has improved its produces, ie the produces have been improved by the machine.

 

[Foxhound]

Yea ma men .. am gud !!hope you're doin well too?

Yap, but day started with badluck!

 

[Jasmoni Tegga]

Fafanua mkuu kwa faida ya wengi. Je are both correct?

Sentensi ya kwanza ina ^is lost^ na ile ya pili kuna ^had lost.^ Hizi time frames/stamps hazibadiliki kwenye sentensi mpya baada ya hizo components za awali kuunganishwa pamoja.

 

[Habdavi]

This thread is going viral. It already has 9000 views.

 

[Jasmoni Tegga]

There is no "has improved" rather there is "is improved", meaning; (kiingereza chako) kimekuwa bora/kizuri.

"Is improving" not the same as "has improved".

Eg, The machine has improved its produces, ie the produces have been improved by the machine.

Please, tell me if this statement is correct or not:

^The rose flower has grown^

 

[Mangungo II]

Wow,Good morning Mr. Bambaleta,ofcourse am from there but unfortunately I was not lucky enough to have msambwanda. So i ain't cute as you imagine [emoji3][emoji3]

Whaaaaaat!!!! I ngonja nikimbie there[emoji1]

 

[Mokaze]

The pen which you gave me had lost.

what type of English is this?? 🤣🤣

 

[Jasmoni Tegga]

what type of English is this?? [emoji1787][emoji1787]

Kalamu uliyonipatia ilikuwa imepotea.

 

[Mokaze]

Kalamu uliyonipatia ilikuwa imepotea.

The sentence is supposed to be;

"The pen you gave me have had been lost".

That is, by the time he gave you the pen, it was still lost (let's say you were still searching for it )

Go and study the use of "have had".

 

[Mokaze]

Please, tell me if this statement is correct or not:

^The rose flower has grown^

That statement is correct.

And, tell me which statement is correct:

"The pen is lost" and "the pen has lost"

 

[Superbug]

That statement is correct.

And, tell me which statement is correct:

"The pen is lost" and "the pen has lost"

The second one is incorrect because there must been inserted in between has and lost.

 

[Jasmoni Tegga]

The sentence is supposed to be;

"The pen you gave me have had been lost".

That is, by the time he gave you the pen, it was still lost (let's say you were still searching for it )

Go and study the use of "have had".

^That is, by the time he gave you the pen, it was still lost^

It's practically impossible to be given a literal pen which is lost at the moment.

 

[Jasmoni Tegga]

That statement is correct.

And, tell me which statement is correct:

"The pen is lost" and "the pen has lost"

What about:

^The rose flower had grown^

 

[Mokaze]

^That is, by the time he gave you the pen, it was still lost^

It's practically impossible to be given a literal pen which is lost at the moment.

Let me write.in kiswahili the
language I believe you master better than English.

Mfano Ulikuwa unayo kalamu baadaye ikapotea kwa mfano siku 2 hivi, hiyo peni akaikota mtu na akakuletea. Kesho yake huyo mtu akaja kwako na ukaanza kumuhadithia habari ya hiyo kalamu.

Kwamba: Kalamu uliyonipa iliyokuwa imepotea.

Uliyonipa------ You gave me,
Iliyokuwa imepotea (katika muda wa kabla hajakuletea hiyo kalamu) ---- have had been lost.


Wewe unajitahidi katika kiingereza ukilinganisha na Watz tuliowengi isipokuwa nimeona unatakiwa u perfect (you are in a perfection level) kiingereza chako.

Kwanza, Jifunze the 5 (five) conditional sentences, Zero , General, imaginative, impossible (too late) and the mixed conditionals, jifunze stative verbs na tenses.

 

[Okwaaa]

My super answer is that:
The pen which you gave me is lost. Completely correct.
Others says, use had instead of is, this will laid wrong meaning in term of time, perhaps the real meaning will remain as its.
Why is and not had. Look at the the sentence again, then separate it from the subject and predicate. I think now u understand what i mean. The question seeks us to site the correct answer without misleading the information (meaning)

The pen which you gave me is lost. Here informer, tell us that, there was a pen where someone unknown gave him, but unfortunately that pen got lost at that moment (not longer the action occurred)
But when you say
The pen which you gave me had lost. It means the moment he got that pen was simultaneously to the pen lost. In one way you can say he given a pen and he lost the pen given at the same time. Something which is wrong.

So the exactly answer is. THE PEN WHICH YOU GAVE ME IS LOST.

Fafanua mkuu kwa faida ya wengi. Je are both correct?