Psychedelic Drugs & Consciousness

Psychedelic Drugs & Consciousness

Bado nakula nondo, nijue vema kabisa na nielewe
Mimea mingi zaidi na zaidi
Akilini mwangu nimeongeza ramani ya kishamba kutakua na michicha ila nia yangu sio michicha ila ayo majani mengine (divine plants)

Mk54 ile texts yangu kule PM haukuijibu brother natambua ubusy ukipata wasaa pitia mtaa ule kidogo

No Worries Kaka. Will Respond
 
IMG_5024.jpg

Hizi zilikuwa zinaelekea Europe. Hii yote ni kwa sababu Tanzania ni mlango isiyokuwa na ulinzi madhubuti.

Serikali iwe makini sana Kilwa, Lindi kote Mtwara na Zanzibar ni milango mikuu ya kusafirisha hizi hard drugs kwenda Ulaya.

DCEA Fanyeni kazi zenu kwa kutumia akili, msigeuke kuwa waandishi wa habari. tuna clinic chache sana za ku accommodate jamii iloyoathirika na hard drugs. Wote wanaohusika wachukuliwe hatua madhubuti .

Otherwise, tutakuwa na generation ya mwendo wa kinyonga.
 
Hii ni kweli , changamoto kubwa mimi naona watu wafundishwe kwanza.
-
Kwa sababu hakuna kitu hakina madhara.
-
Hata maji uki Over dose kwa Mfano ukanywa 6 L per day wakati wewe body mass yako inataka unywe 1.5L per day, utaenda ku create fluid retention in your body , Na utasababisha pressure kupanda, over time utaanza ku damage your vital organs such as kidney, brain vessels leading to stroke etc etc.
-
Vivo Hivyo kwa hizi mind altering drugs. They have serious side effect ukiwa una Over dose na kutumia mara kwa mara . Yaani vina ku dissociate na reality ya dunia, na sometimes unapoteza feelings za maisha kabisa. Yaani unaona kupata au kukosa is just a game. Let it be .
-
Substance kama hiyo LSD, DMT kwanza zinapatikana naturally kwenye mimea lakini pia drug dealers wanazitumia kutengeneza illicit substance in form of powder and tablets wakati huo huo wanachanganya na chemicals nyingine and makes it more addictive and dangerous.
-
DMT, LSD , Pscilocibin Mushroom zote zimekwa na WHO kwenye Schedule I Controlled Drug ikiwa na maana ya kuwa haifai kwa matumizi ya Dawa wala kwa matumizi yoyote na ukishikwa nayo you should go to Jail . Lakini jiulize Mbona mmea wake bado unaendelea kulimwa .

Shida kubwa pia kwa mfano, leo unamuuliza mtu anaetumia bangi, kwanini unavuta bangi ? Hatoweza kukupa Jibu sahihi.
-
Wengi huvuta kwa makundi, kuiga bila ya kujifunza na kufanya research matokeo yake wanaenda kuharibu akili zao na kuwa wahuni.
-
Na bangi wanazotumia sio zile kutoka shamba , ni zile ambazo wameshachanganya na cocaine ili Kesho uje tena .... baadae mtu anakuwa teja.
-
Know why do you have to smoke ; what do you want from smoking: ? Je unahitaji Creativity or writings or transcendence etc etc yaani lazima uwe na sababu ya kuvuta au kutumia psychedelic substances. Kama Huna sababu then stop it .

Methadone is one of psychedelic, mind altering substance, Na ndiyo hutumika kwenye ku withdraw wale watu waliokuwa addicted na cocaine. methadone Center ipo hapo MNH, Amana , Temeke , Mwananyamala kwa Hospital za Dar Tu.
-
Suali la Msingi unawezaje kuitumia methadone ukaacha DMT, LSD au Pscilocybin Mushroom [emoji265]. Hizi ndio the natural substance ambazo zinamfanya mtu aache kabisa kuwa addicted na kuacha kutumia cocaine na Heroin.
-
Ni substance ambazo zikitumiwa at recommended dose under guidance, makes your life more meaningful, spiritual, brave and creative.

It is all about awaken the consciousness, self realization, the one we are.
-
I personally have used all those psychedelic substances. If you are lucky to get the natural plant from your own garden, then you are done.

LSD tablets, I don’t recommend t’ buying View attachment 1707053
these laboratories made.



View attachment 1707053
DMT powder, it is also laboratory made, I don’t recommend. You have to get the natural plants kama unavoipata Cannabis.

View attachment 1707054

Magic Mushroom, Pscilocybin Mushroom. The tree of Life. The tree of Good and Evil .

View attachment 1707055

LSD plant containing. You need to have this in your secret garden. You may use once per year or 3 years. If you use like that, you will see the benefits of being born on earth.

View attachment 1707056
The DMT plant containing, the tree of life and death, the Vial of pendant eternity.

View attachment 1707057

The Powder , don’t buy this, find the natural plant.

I have a lot of photos and my experience to DMT and LSD , kutokana na uhalisia wa kazi yangu. I am not allowed to share anything from Social platforms . View attachment 1707054
Mkuu nilikuuliza matumizi ya huu mmea lakini hukunipa jibu,unaitwaje na unautumiaje katika Ku kustimulate mind? Your help please. Maana ninao kwa wingi

JamiiForums628094911.jpg
 
Mk54 njoo huku ujibu hoja Yangu tafadhari

Thank you for your patience.

Mmea huo unaitwa Datura Stramonium. Mbegu zake pamoja na majani ndiyo Principal Active mostly ni Hyoscamine na Hyscine.
-
Ni mind altering substances very powerful and dangerous Kama ukitumia out of knowledge.
-
Ni divine plant inayotumika for Transcendence kama ilivyo DMT au LSD.
-
It gives you the mystical experience and Transcendence Journey beyond the mind limitations.
-
It takes you to the here now , absolutely infinite. Do we even know what infinity is ?
-
This plant revealed that you cannot make nothing out of something. Mmea huu ndio uliwapa scientists maana halisi ya Infinity.

What does it mean INFINITY? The answer came from this plant hence the discover of Fractals ( Mandelbrot set ) check it on youtube, Mandelbrot Set ( Fractal)....
-
just find that one ambayo haina explaination .. just the view.
-
Kwa Mfano,kama ukichukua karatasi ukakata nusu, na nusu ukakata nusu na nusu ukakata nusu and keep on like that.....je will you run out of something to cut ? The answer is no , you will always find something to cut and no end ..... because there is no end in this life. the plant tells you Death is never an end... it is just a passage to the next spiritual realms.

All these secrets were experienced through Datura Stramonium Transcendence Journey, the mystical Consciousness.
-
With this in mind, it revealed that energy cannot be destroyed for as long as we are unable to make nothing out of something.
-
Death is something, we therefore cannot make it nothing;

I’m ......... we cannot destroy it.
Can we ?
-
Hyoscamine ni very powerful alkaloids.... it can take your life kama uki Over dose out of understanding what to understand.
Majani yake huchanganywa na mbegu huandaliwa kama Vine.

I am not recommending anyone to try anything unless you have well informed regarding the matter.

.
 
Thank you for your patience.

Mmea huo unaitwa Datura Stramonium. Mbegu zake pamoja na majani ndiyo Principal Active mostly ni Hyoscamine na Hyscine.
-
Ni mind altering substances very powerful and dangerous Kama ukitumia out of knowledge.
-
Ni divine plant inayotumika for Transcendence kama ilivyo DMT au LSD.
-
It gives you the mystical experience and Transcendence Journey beyond the mind limitations.
-
It takes you to the here now , absolutely infinite. Do we even know what infinity is ?
-
This plant revealed that you cannot make nothing out of something. Mmea huu ndio uliwapa scientists maana halisi ya Infinity.

What does it mean INFINITY? The answer came from this plant hence the discover of Fractals ( Mandelbrot set ) check it on youtube, Mandelbrot Set ( Fractal)....
-
just find that one ambayo haina explaination .. just the view.
-
Kwa Mfano,kama ukichukua karatasi ukakata nusu, na nusu ukakata nusu na nusu ukakata nusu and keep on like that.....je will you run out of something to cut ? The answer is no , you will always find something to cut and no end ..... because there is no end in this life. the plant tells you Death is never an end... it is just a passage to the next spiritual realms.

All these secrets were experienced through Datura Stramonium Transcendence Journey, the mystical Consciousness.
-
With this in mind, it revealed that energy cannot be destroyed for as long as we are unable to make nothing out of something.
-
Death is something, we therefore cannot make it nothing;

I’m ......... we cannot destroy it.
Can we ?
-
Hyoscamine ni very powerful alkaloids.... it can take your life kama uki Over dose out of understanding what to understand.
Majani yake huchanganywa na mbegu huandaliwa kama Vine.

I am not recommending anyone to try anything unless you have well informed regarding the matter.

.
Mkuu tafadhali elezea jinsi ya kuandaa na kutumia huo mmea!

Cc Knowledge seeker

Sent from my Infinix X572 using JamiiForums mobile app
 
Thank you for your patience.

Mmea huo unaitwa Datura Stramonium. Mbegu zake pamoja na majani ndiyo Principal Active mostly ni Hyoscamine na Hyscine.
-
Ni mind altering substances very powerful and dangerous Kama ukitumia out of knowledge.
-
Ni divine plant inayotumika for Transcendence kama ilivyo DMT au LSD.
-
It gives you the mystical experience and Transcendence Journey beyond the mind limitations.
-
It takes you to the here now , absolutely infinite. Do we even know what infinity is ?
-
This plant revealed that you cannot make nothing out of something. Mmea huu ndio uliwapa scientists maana halisi ya Infinity.

What does it mean INFINITY? The answer came from this plant hence the discover of Fractals ( Mandelbrot set ) check it on youtube, Mandelbrot Set ( Fractal)....
-
just find that one ambayo haina explaination .. just the view.
-
Kwa Mfano,kama ukichukua karatasi ukakata nusu, na nusu ukakata nusu na nusu ukakata nusu and keep on like that.....je will you run out of something to cut ? The answer is no , you will always find something to cut and no end ..... because there is no end in this life. the plant tells you Death is never an end... it is just a passage to the next spiritual realms.

All these secrets were experienced through Datura Stramonium Transcendence Journey, the mystical Consciousness.
-
With this in mind, it revealed that energy cannot be destroyed for as long as we are unable to make nothing out of something.
-
Death is something, we therefore cannot make it nothing;

I’m ......... we cannot destroy it.
Can we ?
-
Hyoscamine ni very powerful alkaloids.... it can take your life kama uki Over dose out of understanding what to understand.
Majani yake huchanganywa na mbegu huandaliwa kama Vine.

I am not recommending anyone to try anything unless you have well informed regarding the matter.

.

Well said mkuu. Btw, since you mentioned fractals and infinity, here are my two cents regarding the topics, {something, infinity & nothing}. (Kumradhi kwenu wachangiaji wote kwa kutotumia Kiswahili, doing so would've been very painful!);

From a computational(set theory) perspective, if it's "something" i.e a set, then it's also capable of holding nothing/void (aka the empty set) at the same time since you can't define a set without starting with the empty set, hence the cardinality of the empty set is 0.
Well, for something to exist in the set, it has to always be entangled in nothing or the empty set as it's fundamental foundation of existence, but not the other way around since nothing is just and only equal to nothing. In other words, you can have a null/None/nothing or its cardinality(0) without a 1/something BUT you can't have a 1(something) without getting a null/0(nothing) for free behind the scene. So basically when we say "something", is just another way of saying "nothing entangled with something", and when we say "nothing" it's just "nothing" aka the simplest state according to Leibniz. Mind you though, the empty set !=(is not equal to) nothing, but rather a set with nothing within it, which in other words, in set theory "nothing" can never exist without a container(something), which also means a set with nothing(the empty set) is also something fundamentally.

Now, according to Leibniz, metaphysical bias for simplicity, when driven to its logical conclusion, yields the embarrassing prediction that there is "nothing". After all, an empty world would be free of objects trying to elbow each other out. It is the world that requires the least effort to produce (Just do nothing!) and sustain (Continue doing nothing!), hence his famous question, "why is there something rather than nothing?". Using less set notations this time around, while also trying very hard not to get trapped into Leibniz’s limbo, let me try to elaborate further the statement, "you cannot make nothing out of something".
On a side note, there are infinitely many possible sizes for infinite sets, you can basically have an infinite set of infinity sets... hence infinity of infinities is a possible possibility, i.e in the set {0,...,1}, infinity of infinities(...) is what is in between 0 and 1(0.0001, 0.001, ... etc).

So, to make nothing from something, you'll need to deduct "something" into it's most simplest form of which unfortunately, as long as something still exists, the outcome of its deduction can never be pure "nothing' but rather, just another something that is less than or another state/form of the original something due to the laws of nature (i.e the law of conservation of energy). However, the other way around is kinder possible, you can try to make something out of nothing if and only if the very initial state to begin with is pure nothing, of which unfortunately you would still need an external something or not so pure nothingness(quantum vacuum) to accomplish that!
Actually if i'm being honest, i think the latter is just some tricky word play really, which makes me partially conclude that you also can't really make something out of pure nothing without cheating! Even in the context of Cantor's set theory, sets can not be formed from pure nothing(you still need something("{}") to form the empty set).

Now, if nothing can purely exist without something, and can not exist with something but rather within an abstract something, one would probably ask, "A part from just an abstract notation, What is even the point of talking about nothing when all we can ever have is just something?".
Well, according to most Eastern philosophies, nothing or emptiness or sunyata is a state of being or a state of mind, where achieving "nothing" as a state of mind allows one to be totally focused on a thought or activity at a level of intensity that they would not be able to achieve if they were consciously thinking. In these Eastern perspectives, we're all in the human consciousness. The humankind is one layer of the human body consciousness of which it's fully integrated into a cosmic consciousness, the cosmic consciousness operates everything. Whereas there is nothing which is called nothingness except when all the information in our mind is no longer there. Realization of that state is what is so called Nirvana in Buddhism. Being in such a state of mind is being one with the cosmos or being fully aware of one's own awareness. Basically, the concept of "nothingness/emptiness/sunyata" can also be characterized by an ego-less state of being in which one fully realizes one's own small part in the cosmos.
Speaking of consciousness and being, Sartre(a famous existentialist) defines two kinds of "being", which are etre-en-soi (the brute existence of things) and etre-pour-soi (consciousness). Now Sartre claims that the latter kind of being is "nothing" since consciousness cannot be an object of consciousness and can possess no essence. In other words, if you're asked to point where consciousness is, can you do it without referring where consciousness resides? If you can't, doesn't that mean consciousness can simply be reduced to fundamentally nothingness residing on, with or within an object/body, that only takes form when the body express a subjectively experience?

PS: Regarding the famous question of Leibniz, one kind of answer is to say that there had to be something; that it would have been impossible for there to have been nothing. Or as Krauss claims in his book(A Universe from Nothing), our universe arose naturally and inevitably from the operation of gravity on the quantum vacuum, empty space teeming with virtual particles that spontaneously pop into existence before disappearing again. Krauss’ theory implies that there could not have been nothing because there has always been something; first there was gravity and the quantum vacuum, and out of that was born the universe as we know it. Another kind of answer is the one proposed by Russell, which is simply denying that the great question has an answer.
 
is a state of being or a state of mind, where achieving "nothing" as a state of mind allows one to be totally focused on a thought or activity at a level of intensity that they would not be able to achieve..... if they were consciously thinking .....

the cosmic consciousness operates everything.

Being in such a state of mind is being one with the cosmos or being fully aware of one's own awareness

if you're asked to point where consciousness is, can you do it without referring where consciousness resides
Maswali fikirishi sana haya
 
Well said mkuu. Btw, since you mentioned fractals and infinity, here are my two cents regarding the topics, {something, infinity & nothing}. (Kumradhi kwenu wachangiaji wote kwa kutotumia Kiswahili, doing so would've been very painful!);

From a computational(set theory) perspective, if it's "something" i.e a set, then it's also capable of holding nothing/void (aka the empty set) at the same time since you can't define a set without starting with the empty set, hence the cardinality of the empty set is 0.
Well, for something to exist in the set, it has to always be entangled in nothing or the empty set as it's fundamental foundation of existence, but not the other way around since nothing is just and only equal to nothing. In other words, you can have a null/None/nothing or its cardinality(0) without a 1/something BUT you can't have a 1(something) without getting a null/0(nothing) for free behind the scene. So basically when we say "something", is just another way of saying "nothing entangled with something", and when we say "nothing" it's just "nothing" aka the simplest state according to Leibniz. Mind you though, the empty set !=(is not equal to) nothing, but rather a set with nothing within it, which in other words, in set theory "nothing" can never exist without a container(something), which also means a set with nothing(the empty set) is also something fundamentally.

Now, according to Leibniz, metaphysical bias for simplicity, when driven to its logical conclusion, yields the embarrassing prediction that there is "nothing". After all, an empty world would be free of objects trying to elbow each other out. It is the world that requires the least effort to produce (Just do nothing!) and sustain (Continue doing nothing!), hence his famous question, "why is there something rather than nothing?". Using less set notations this time around, while also trying very hard not to get trapped into Leibniz’s limbo, let me try to elaborate further the statement, "you cannot make nothing out of something".
On a side note, there are infinitely many possible sizes for infinite sets, you can basically have an infinite set of infinity sets... hence infinity of infinities is a possible possibility, i.e in the set {0,...,1}, infinity of infinities(...) is what is in between 0 and 1(0.0001, 0.001, ... etc).

So, to make nothing from something, you'll need to deduct "something" into it's most simplest form of which unfortunately, as long as something still exists, the outcome of its deduction can never be pure "nothing' but rather, just another something that is less than or another state/form of the original something due to the laws of nature (i.e the law of conservation of energy). However, the other way around is kinder possible, you can try to make something out of nothing if and only if the very initial state to begin with is pure nothing, of which unfortunately you would still need an external something or not so pure nothingness(quantum vacuum) to accomplish that!
Actually if i'm being honest, i think the latter is just some tricky word play really, which makes me partially conclude that you also can't really make something out of pure nothing without cheating! Even in the context of Cantor's set theory, sets can not be formed from pure nothing(you still need something("{}") to form the empty set).

Now, if nothing can purely exist without something, and can not exist with something but rather within an abstract something, one would probably ask, "A part from just an abstract notation, What is even the point of talking about nothing when all we can ever have is just something?".
Well, according to most Eastern philosophies, nothing or emptiness or sunyata is a state of being or a state of mind, where achieving "nothing" as a state of mind allows one to be totally focused on a thought or activity at a level of intensity that they would not be able to achieve if they were consciously thinking. In these Eastern perspectives, we're all in the human consciousness. The humankind is one layer of the human body consciousness of which it's fully integrated into a cosmic consciousness, the cosmic consciousness operates everything. Whereas there is nothing which is called nothingness except when all the information in our mind is no longer there. Realization of that state is what is so called Nirvana in Buddhism. Being in such a state of mind is being one with the cosmos or being fully aware of one's own awareness. Basically, the concept of "nothingness/emptiness/sunyata" can also be characterized by an ego-less state of being in which one fully realizes one's own small part in the cosmos.
Speaking of consciousness and being, Sartre(a famous existentialist) defines two kinds of "being", which are etre-en-soi (the brute existence of things) and etre-pour-soi (consciousness). Now Sartre claims that the latter kind of being is "nothing" since consciousness cannot be an object of consciousness and can possess no essence. In other words, if you're asked to point where consciousness is, can you do it without referring where consciousness resides? If you can't, doesn't that mean consciousness can simply be reduced to fundamentally nothingness residing on, with or within an object/body, that only takes form when the body express a subjectively experience?

PS: Regarding the famous question of Leibniz, one kind of answer is to say that there had to be something; that it would have been impossible for there to have been nothing. Or as Krauss claims in his book(A Universe from Nothing), our universe arose naturally and inevitably from the operation of gravity on the quantum vacuum, empty space teeming with virtual particles that spontaneously pop into existence before disappearing again. Krauss’ theory implies that there could not have been nothing because there has always been something; first there was gravity and the quantum vacuum, and out of that was born the universe as we know it. Another kind of answer is the one proposed by Russell, which is simply denying that the great question has an answer.

Very Nice.

In addition to that ,Mandelbrot, as a simple formula that can repeat itself an infinite amount of times without ever resulting in the same thing or outcome.

I like this perspective because Most things will be very close to the same, but never exactly the same. That is how life works. The same simple thing is done over and over again (balancing opposites), and in doing, with the help of the collective unconscious, it creates the most complicated and diverse things in nature, including us.
-
Also, Fractals are the way that we can understand how the physical universe moves in a perfect balance, but it is never the same. It is truly always new.
 
Back
Top Bottom