Psychedelic Drugs & Consciousness


No Worries Kaka. Will Respond
 

Hizi zilikuwa zinaelekea Europe. Hii yote ni kwa sababu Tanzania ni mlango isiyokuwa na ulinzi madhubuti.

Serikali iwe makini sana Kilwa, Lindi kote Mtwara na Zanzibar ni milango mikuu ya kusafirisha hizi hard drugs kwenda Ulaya.

DCEA Fanyeni kazi zenu kwa kutumia akili, msigeuke kuwa waandishi wa habari. tuna clinic chache sana za ku accommodate jamii iloyoathirika na hard drugs. Wote wanaohusika wachukuliwe hatua madhubuti .

Otherwise, tutakuwa na generation ya mwendo wa kinyonga.
 
Mkuu nilikuuliza matumizi ya huu mmea lakini hukunipa jibu,unaitwaje na unautumiaje katika Ku kustimulate mind? Your help please. Maana ninao kwa wingi

 
Mk54 njoo huku ujibu hoja Yangu tafadhari

Thank you for your patience.

Mmea huo unaitwa Datura Stramonium. Mbegu zake pamoja na majani ndiyo Principal Active mostly ni Hyoscamine na Hyscine.
-
Ni mind altering substances very powerful and dangerous Kama ukitumia out of knowledge.
-
Ni divine plant inayotumika for Transcendence kama ilivyo DMT au LSD.
-
It gives you the mystical experience and Transcendence Journey beyond the mind limitations.
-
It takes you to the here now , absolutely infinite. Do we even know what infinity is ?
-
This plant revealed that you cannot make nothing out of something. Mmea huu ndio uliwapa scientists maana halisi ya Infinity.

What does it mean INFINITY? The answer came from this plant hence the discover of Fractals ( Mandelbrot set ) check it on youtube, Mandelbrot Set ( Fractal)....
-
just find that one ambayo haina explaination .. just the view.
-
Kwa Mfano,kama ukichukua karatasi ukakata nusu, na nusu ukakata nusu na nusu ukakata nusu and keep on like that.....je will you run out of something to cut ? The answer is no , you will always find something to cut and no end ..... because there is no end in this life. the plant tells you Death is never an end... it is just a passage to the next spiritual realms.

All these secrets were experienced through Datura Stramonium Transcendence Journey, the mystical Consciousness.
-
With this in mind, it revealed that energy cannot be destroyed for as long as we are unable to make nothing out of something.
-
Death is something, we therefore cannot make it nothing;

I’m ......... we cannot destroy it.
Can we ?
-
Hyoscamine ni very powerful alkaloids.... it can take your life kama uki Over dose out of understanding what to understand.
Majani yake huchanganywa na mbegu huandaliwa kama Vine.

I am not recommending anyone to try anything unless you have well informed regarding the matter.

.
 
Please, we have discussed the same issue kwenye comments za awali. Kindly review.
nmeangalia uzi wote sijaona ukielezea jinsi ya kutoa hzo sumu sumu mwilini kama sehem ipo naomba unitag mkuu
 
Mkuu tafadhali elezea jinsi ya kuandaa na kutumia huo mmea!

Cc Knowledge seeker

Sent from my Infinix X572 using JamiiForums mobile app
 

Well said mkuu. Btw, since you mentioned fractals and infinity, here are my two cents regarding the topics, {something, infinity & nothing}. (Kumradhi kwenu wachangiaji wote kwa kutotumia Kiswahili, doing so would've been very painful!);

From a computational(set theory) perspective, if it's "something" i.e a set, then it's also capable of holding nothing/void (aka the empty set) at the same time since you can't define a set without starting with the empty set, hence the cardinality of the empty set is 0.
Well, for something to exist in the set, it has to always be entangled in nothing or the empty set as it's fundamental foundation of existence, but not the other way around since nothing is just and only equal to nothing. In other words, you can have a null/None/nothing or its cardinality(0) without a 1/something BUT you can't have a 1(something) without getting a null/0(nothing) for free behind the scene. So basically when we say "something", is just another way of saying "nothing entangled with something", and when we say "nothing" it's just "nothing" aka the simplest state according to Leibniz. Mind you though, the empty set !=(is not equal to) nothing, but rather a set with nothing within it, which in other words, in set theory "nothing" can never exist without a container(something), which also means a set with nothing(the empty set) is also something fundamentally.

Now, according to Leibniz, metaphysical bias for simplicity, when driven to its logical conclusion, yields the embarrassing prediction that there is "nothing". After all, an empty world would be free of objects trying to elbow each other out. It is the world that requires the least effort to produce (Just do nothing!) and sustain (Continue doing nothing!), hence his famous question, "why is there something rather than nothing?". Using less set notations this time around, while also trying very hard not to get trapped into Leibniz’s limbo, let me try to elaborate further the statement, "you cannot make nothing out of something".
On a side note, there are infinitely many possible sizes for infinite sets, you can basically have an infinite set of infinity sets... hence infinity of infinities is a possible possibility, i.e in the set {0,...,1}, infinity of infinities(...) is what is in between 0 and 1(0.0001, 0.001, ... etc).

So, to make nothing from something, you'll need to deduct "something" into it's most simplest form of which unfortunately, as long as something still exists, the outcome of its deduction can never be pure "nothing' but rather, just another something that is less than or another state/form of the original something due to the laws of nature (i.e the law of conservation of energy). However, the other way around is kinder possible, you can try to make something out of nothing if and only if the very initial state to begin with is pure nothing, of which unfortunately you would still need an external something or not so pure nothingness(quantum vacuum) to accomplish that!
Actually if i'm being honest, i think the latter is just some tricky word play really, which makes me partially conclude that you also can't really make something out of pure nothing without cheating! Even in the context of Cantor's set theory, sets can not be formed from pure nothing(you still need something("{}") to form the empty set).

Now, if nothing can purely exist without something, and can not exist with something but rather within an abstract something, one would probably ask, "A part from just an abstract notation, What is even the point of talking about nothing when all we can ever have is just something?".
Well, according to most Eastern philosophies, nothing or emptiness or sunyata is a state of being or a state of mind, where achieving "nothing" as a state of mind allows one to be totally focused on a thought or activity at a level of intensity that they would not be able to achieve if they were consciously thinking. In these Eastern perspectives, we're all in the human consciousness. The humankind is one layer of the human body consciousness of which it's fully integrated into a cosmic consciousness, the cosmic consciousness operates everything. Whereas there is nothing which is called nothingness except when all the information in our mind is no longer there. Realization of that state is what is so called Nirvana in Buddhism. Being in such a state of mind is being one with the cosmos or being fully aware of one's own awareness. Basically, the concept of "nothingness/emptiness/sunyata" can also be characterized by an ego-less state of being in which one fully realizes one's own small part in the cosmos.
Speaking of consciousness and being, Sartre(a famous existentialist) defines two kinds of "being", which are etre-en-soi (the brute existence of things) and etre-pour-soi (consciousness). Now Sartre claims that the latter kind of being is "nothing" since consciousness cannot be an object of consciousness and can possess no essence. In other words, if you're asked to point where consciousness is, can you do it without referring where consciousness resides? If you can't, doesn't that mean consciousness can simply be reduced to fundamentally nothingness residing on, with or within an object/body, that only takes form when the body express a subjectively experience?

PS: Regarding the famous question of Leibniz, one kind of answer is to say that there had to be something; that it would have been impossible for there to have been nothing. Or as Krauss claims in his book(A Universe from Nothing), our universe arose naturally and inevitably from the operation of gravity on the quantum vacuum, empty space teeming with virtual particles that spontaneously pop into existence before disappearing again. Krauss’ theory implies that there could not have been nothing because there has always been something; first there was gravity and the quantum vacuum, and out of that was born the universe as we know it. Another kind of answer is the one proposed by Russell, which is simply denying that the great question has an answer.
 

the cosmic consciousness operates everything.

Being in such a state of mind is being one with the cosmos or being fully aware of one's own awareness

if you're asked to point where consciousness is, can you do it without referring where consciousness resides
Maswali fikirishi sana haya
 

Very Nice.

In addition to that ,Mandelbrot, as a simple formula that can repeat itself an infinite amount of times without ever resulting in the same thing or outcome.

I like this perspective because Most things will be very close to the same, but never exactly the same. That is how life works. The same simple thing is done over and over again (balancing opposites), and in doing, with the help of the collective unconscious, it creates the most complicated and diverse things in nature, including us.
-
Also, Fractals are the way that we can understand how the physical universe moves in a perfect balance, but it is never the same. It is truly always new.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…